structural performance of frp in...
TRANSCRIPT
Structural Performance of FRP in FireStructural Performance of FRP in Fire
Mark F. GreenQueen’s University at KingstonLeverhulme Visiting Professor
8 April 2014Steel in Fire Forum
1
Outline
• FRP and High Temperature• FRP Material Tests • Recent Full-Scale Tests on Beams • Modelling – Different Fire Scenarios• Design Approaches
2
Deterioration of structures
New construction
Cost Environment
FRP
Strengthening Rehabilitation
Existing Technology
New technologies
FRP
Use in buildingsFire concern
Introduction
• Fire design criteria must be satisfied in buildings
• Little research has been performed to date
3
4
Glass fibreroving
Carbon fibre roving
Unidirectional glass FRP bar
Carbon FRP prestressing
tendon
Aramid FRP grid
Examples of FRP
High strength fibres in a polymer matrix
Material Tests
• Tensile strength• FRP to FRP bond• FRP to concrete bond• Steady-state temperature tests• Transient temperature tests• Tests up to 200 degrees C
5
Some tensile test results (Tyfo GFRP)
7T e m p e ra tu re (C )
( )
0 5 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 2 0 0 2 5 0
Nor
mal
ized
Ten
sile
Stre
ngth
0 .0
0 .5
1 .0
1 .5
T g = 7 5 CP R = 0 .4 6k m = 0 .0 8 8 2
T cen tra l = 4 7 CR = 0 .9 5R 2 = 0 .9 0
Steady State Proposed Model
0.02.04.06.08.0
10.012.014.016.0
0 50 100 150 200
Stre
ngth
(kN
)
Temperature (°C)
Proposed Model
~ 35°C
95% confidence interval
w is 0.018
8
• Span 3.8 m• FRP materials
– Sika CarboDur S812– SikaWrap Hex103– Tyfo CFRP, GFRP– MBrace
• Insulation– Sikacrete®-213 – Tyfo VG system– Other cementitious system
Fire Tests, T-beams
10
1220mm
150mm250mm CFR
P Insulation
Figure 3‐33 Flames are visible at cracks in the U‐wrap location, Beam‐B after 1 hour and 53 minutes of fire exposure. 13
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 60 120 180 240 300
Furnace temp.
Insulation Surface
FRP/Concrete
FRP Surface
Time (min)
Tem
pera
ture
(˚C)
Beam-B SikaWrap® Hex 103C 40 mm of Sikacrete®-213F
16
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Tyfo 25 mm VG Tyfo 40 mm VG MBrace 30 mmCem
MBrace 30 mmCem
Carbodur 40mm Cem
SikaWrap 40mm Cem
Tyfo 15 mm VG Tyfo 20 mm VG
Stre
ngth
(kN
.m)
Summary of T-Beam Tests (CSA S806)
17
Strengthened Design Resista
Test Load
Maximum Test Load
Maximum Test Loa
Test Load
Heat Transfer FV Model
• Nonlinear Finite Volume code• Explicit formulation• 2D• In MATLAB environment• Accounts for variation in
– Thermal properties– Moisture content
20
T-beam Temp. Predictionsunexposed surface centreline cover of 155 mm
longitudinal steel FRP-concrete interface
21
Structural Model
• Beam theory– Bernoulli hypothesis (plane sections remain plane)– Iterative solution– Includes Transient Creep
22
Deflection Prediction including Axial Force
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
‐60 0 60 120 180 240 300
Defle
ction (m
m)
Time(min)
Model Axial=100‐0Model Axial=100‐100Model Axial=100‐200Model Axial=100‐300Beam_A_Test
24
Different Fire Scenarios
(Lie 1992)
250 10.
. 3 1 . 1 4 1 C600 .
√ / Fire I 0.01 30 0.0Fire II 0.05 30 0.0Fire III 0.10 30 0.0Fire IV 0.10 100 1.0
25
Different Fires (Strength Calculations)
• T‐beam‐A&B • 40 mm Sikacrete ‐213F insulationLongitudinal steel temperature
26
Different Fire Structural Response
• T-Beam-C• 13 mm of WR-AFP insulation• Load 24.1 kN/m
0
200
400
600
800
0 60 120 180 240 300
Tempe
rature (°C)
Time(min)
Steel Temp. Fire ISteel Temp. Fire IISteel Temp. Fire IIISteel Temp. Fire IVSteel Temp. E119
0
50
100
150
200
0 60 120 180 240 300
Deflection (m
m)
Time(min)
Deflection Fire IDeflection Fire IIDeflection Fire IIIDeflection Fire IVDeflection E119
27
Philosophy for Fire‐Safety
Temp.(ºC)Load
Time
Initial Service Life Retrofitted Life
Strength
Service Load
Fire Event (hrs)0 1 2 3 4
1000
100
Retrofit
Fire Event Onset
Construction
Conceptual design approach
Fire resistance
Flame spreadprotectionAm
ount
of S
treng
then
ing
Protect FRP Itself
Steel Structures?
• Structural steel can also be strengthened with FRP
• Fire performance has not been investigated• Strategies for fire protection could be similar to
that of concrete– Role of intumescent paints?– Spray-applied insulation
32Photos courtesy of Prof. Amir Fam
Conclusions
• All members achieved 4 hour fire ratings– FRP reached its glass transition temperature fairly quickly– Structural contribution of FRP unknown– Insulation provided protection to concrete and steel
• Predictions of numerical models were consistent with experimental observations
• Conceptual design model shows promise
Acknowledgements
• Students and Post-docs: Duncan Cree, Luke Bisby, Brea Williams, Masoud Adelzadeh, Ershad Chowdhury, Rob Eedson, Kevin Hollingshead, Greg Shier
• NRC collaborators: Noureddine Benichou, Hossein Mostafaei, Venkatesh Kodur
• Technical staff at NRC and Queen’s• ISIS Canada, NSERC, NRC-IRAP• Industry sponsors: Fyfe/Fibrwrap, Sika, BASF• Leverhulme Trust
34