s~z-e,.i : 0

16
"-)6 aJU2.S So ® lise- lk sket- "$ us!: 0/ -"

Upload: others

Post on 04-Dec-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: S~Z-e,.I : 0

"-)6 ~-~or s~-~ aJU2.S

So

® lise- lk sket- ~~ "$

S~Z-e,.I : us!: /'~ ~ ~ 0/ -" ~o/~

Page 2: S~Z-e,.I : 0

APPENDIX

c Solar System Data n

Ir

Ie :s. ty

Massa

Planet (MEl)

PlanetarEquatorial Radiusb

(REI)

y Physical DAverage Density

(kg m­3)

ata Sidereal Rotation

Period (d) Oblateness

(R, - Rp)j Re Bond

Albedo

Mercury 005528 0.3825 5427 58 .6462 0.00000 0.119

ue Venus 0.81500 0.9488 5243 243.Ql8 0.00000 0.750

: 1 Earth 1.00000 1.0000 5515 0.997271 0.0033396 0.306

ne Mars 0.10745 0.5326 3933 1.02596 0.006476 0.250 Ceres (dwarf planet) 0.00016 0.076 2100 0.378 0.0380 0.1 Jupiter 317.83 11.209 1326 0.4135 0.064874 0.343

:he Saturn 95.159 94492 687 0.4438 0.097962 0.342 Uranus 14.536 4.0073 1270 0.7183 0.022927 0300 Neptune 17.147 3.8826 1638 0.6713 0.017081 0.290

the Pluto (dwarf planet) 0.0021 0.178 21tO 6.3872 0.0000 0.4 - 0.6 )Os Erisc (dwarf planet) 0.002? 0.188 2100? 0.6?

urn

first

Planetary Orbital and Satellite Data Sidereal Orbital Equatorial Number

Semi major Orbital Orbital Inclination Inclination Natural Planet Axis (AU) Eccentricity Period (yr) to Ecliptic (0) to Orbit (0) Satellites

Mercury 0.3871 0.2056 0.2408 7.00 0.01 0 Venus 0.7233 0.0067 0.6152 3.39 177.36 0 Earth 1.0000 0.0167 1.0000 0.000 23.45

Mars 1.5236 0.0935 1.8808 1.850 25.19 2 Ceres (dwarf planet) 2.767 0.097 4.603 9.73 0 Jupiter 5.2044 0.0489 11.8618 1.304 3.13 63 Saturn 9.5826 0.0565 29.4567 2.485 26.73 47 Uranus 19.2012 0.0457 84.0107 0.772 97.77 27 Neptune 30.0476 0.0113 164.79 1.769 28.32 13 Pluto (dwarfplanet) 39.4817 0.2488 247.68 1716 122.53 3 Erisc (dwarfplanet) 67.89 0.4378 559 43.99

aM", = 5.9736 X !O24 kg

bR",=6.378136 x 106 m

'Eris was formerly known as 2003 UB313

A-1

Page 3: S~Z-e,.I : 0

IJ}QN,) (~fud~ )

mv~ 0 .06

V~.$ o · &~

I

~ON ­

heather
Typewritten Text
The precession of Mercury's orbit was one of the first successes of Einstein's theory of general relativity.
heather
Typewritten Text
heather
Typewritten Text
heather
Typewritten Text
Page 4: S~Z-e,.I : 0

h"p://hyperphysics.phy-­‐astr.gsu.edu/hbase/rela5v/grel.html#c3  

Page 5: S~Z-e,.I : 0

m~ ~~O'~~

~ &. v,.,.~ ' ~Zi . 8J­

~ GAl ~~ ~ ~ ..cL J

~~ as ~ oJ tU s~~ c4"c :

• '~'f ~o : ecCR.~ ~

~ ~d"st:-/~ 111~ ~ NV"' ~

. • ~060 CkI"'Q~ : ~~ ~ rllfl4.. v·w.>~ ~~ S~ $ AUUI" a,...~ .

(o4te. 19 7 1) '" /80 ~ QU'OSS

. ",.£eio ';',£.-L $ ~~~

heather
Typewritten Text
Page 6: S~Z-e,.I : 0

and thus show the o the tthe he ten is rotated Ice does two ward' of satellite or half d nd

ts ete

.3 Asteroids Asteroids are by far the most abundant named objects in the Solar System. Over one hundred thousand asteroids have been detected, with over thirty thousand having well determined orbits, most of these occupying the asteroid belt between about 2 and 4 AU from the S un (between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter, Figure 7.7). The total mass of all the bodies in the current asteroid belt is only about one-thousandth of an Earth mass, although originally, a few Earth masses of material would have been available in the solar nebula in the region. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, astronomers thought that the asteroid belt represented fragments of a single planet which had somehow disintegrated catastrophically. However the asteroids are now thought to represent fragments of many small planetary bodies that never managed to accrete into one single body. This is due to the strong gravitational influence of the newly formed Jupiter (a) 2AU 'stirring up' the asteroid population, causing collisions which would repeatedly break up the bodies and so impede the formation of one single large object.

Figure 7.7 (a) A representation of the asteroid belt. It seen that the asteroid belt is actually a diffuse

or swarm oforbiting bodies. (b) A cross­through the belt, shown on the same scale.

ind ividual asterold shown moves in an orbit to the ecliptic plane, so that sometimes it is 2AU

it, and sometimes below. You can imagine that s between asteroids will be quite common.

(b)

251

Page 7: S~Z-e,.I : 0

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SOLAR SYSTEM

Figure 7.9 The orbits of known Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHAs). The orbit of Earth is also shown.

The very fact that we see NEAs today means that the NEA population is being continually replenished, and this happens because of the orbital evolution of objects in the inner asteroid belt. The long-term gravitational effects of Jupiter (and even Mars) give rise to a slow'conveyor belt', which delivers bodies to the inner Solar System (although you should also appreciate that it can be a two-way process ­bodies that are already in the inner Solar System can evolve outwards again). Some of the objects that make it into the inner Solar System might eventually hit one of the terrestrial planets.

7.3.1 Asteroid sizes The largest main belt asteroid, discovered in 1801, is (l) Ceres (pronounced 'series ') which has a diameter of 913 km. The next biggest is (2) Pallas, with a diameter of 523 km. (Note that the asteroids are numbered, and so the full name is, for example, (l) Ceres, although often, you will see only the name being used.) As we go smaller and smaller, the asteroids become more numerous. So while there is only 1 asteroid larger than, say, 600 km (i.e. Ceres), there are 7 larger than 300 km, 81 larger than 150 km, and so on. Note that for each reduction in size the number rises steeply. This behaviour is described by a size distribution. This concept will sound familiar to you after considering impact crater size-frequency distributions in Chapter 4 (Box 4.1). It is exactly the same concept, except we are now thinking in terms of asteroid diameter rather than crater diameter.

254

Page 8: S~Z-e,.I : 0

~~~T'~~~) ~~~k~

a.s~ ~~ ~ ~ ect..RX ~ tL;; o~;.e. ~) ~ /80 0

Page 9: S~Z-e,.I : 0

ill ~s ~ tD ~ r CL

"ofy~ Ha.O~ fo,.. ~ ) k..t­

~~ ~ ~~et JbCL~~.

~~~~~ I/o-~~ ~ a 0",- zti. ~

& q. ~ +4d-. U ~~

~~ rf/:.e~ w4k ~d- ~ cross z:4. 8vt!t:.1) a"v:;{ cc:;e,,£ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ sud.- ~~c.Z; . •

~ ~«D&I.> a.-~~ CArM4-..f­

c>\.. do ,"""SJ ~~ 4V(L o~ 0/ ~ f ~. °fj~~ ·

Page 10: S~Z-e,.I : 0

. 16 ;,0 ~.s"~~ ?'Q

c:W.We. z-k. ~t.t or tV\..

~~~C~~ , ­

o~~~~)

~~~ z:(a. ~ r ct. ,

~~~~~~~

~~~~tCo~1O 06ZiWv ~) So ~ ~&. ~

.3~ lao ~r/",3~ ~ .

14 a'f.y ~ ~ r abS~ .

@ #0tAJ tb~ ~ a.o~~ . •

Q.cZ.~ cJeJca-lt ( CS~& ) ~

~~ ~ A. A&t.c.) o..s ~DL. ?

------'-'-~-- - ­

Page 11: S~Z-e,.I : 0

7 MINOR BODIES OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM

Figure 7.10 shows the cumulative size distribution of known asteroids in the asteroid belt. We see that there are many more small asteroids than large ones. The data ' flattens out' at small sizes (10 km or smaller) but this partly due to observational selection; we simply have not yet discovered all the small asteroids. The gradient of the dashed line in Figure 7.10 is significant when considering where most of the material in the asteroid belt is concentrated. In other words, we could ask, is most of the material (i.e. the mass) to be found in the few largest asteroids, or is most of it distributed amongst the numerous small bodies? It turns out that, if all the data followed the same slope as the dashed line shown in Figure 7.10, the total mass of objects contained in each logarithmic diameter step would be approximately the same. For example, the total mass of all asteroids with diameters between 1 and 10 km would be the same as those with diameters between 10 and 100 km. If however the slope of the data was shallower than the dashed line (i.e. more towards the horizontal), this would indicate that the largest bodies accounted for most of the mass contained in the asteroid belt. Conversely, if the data were steeper than the dashed line, most of the mass would be contained in the smaller bodies. The data in Figure 7.10 lies close to the dashed line in the middle region of the plot, but if we were to take all the data together, a best fit straight line would be somewhat shallower than the dashed line. Thus most of the mass in the asteroid belt is concentrated in the few largest asteroids.

As many of the impact craters seen on planetary bodies are caused by the impact of asteroids, it follows that the impact crater size distribution must broadly reflect the asteroid size distribution in some way. So if we expect a large asteroid to make a large crater, and a small asteroid to make a smaller crater, then because there are far more small asteroids, we would expect to see far more small impact craters on planetary surfaces. Indeed, this is what you found in Chapter 4, with the crater size- frequency distribution.

• • •

diameterlkm

• Figure 7.10 The cumulative size distribution ofthe known bodies in the asteroid belt, plotted logarithmically. The graph tells us the number of asteroids that have diameters greater than a given value.

255

Page 12: S~Z-e,.I : 0
Page 13: S~Z-e,.I : 0

Or6U /'V->(M.D~S. WJ:( ~~ -

~ ~ ~~~ otmt;ddiiL ~

/J7CU1) ~ ~k : ~ tW- k~J'Y's ~

z4. ~oL~ . ~~ ~ a..6- ~CDS

~ o~daL~~ eVe. a.6-.s~ ~-S

~ V~) .su.cL cu:J 3: I.J ..2 : / . S~

V~<-t;:,.. .0 ~S "'" ~ s~"p~ ~ ;z,..d. 0" 3-et o~~) iLo ~ ~~~.aA

~ 4-s~ ON5ds --:,./S ~.

~ ~ ~/Ia.~ e:/- tUULS~

.sz;zAdj a4~ .u!IL ~ -SJ ~

~ ~ b<~. M- ~~ tU~

~ d ~ ff~~~~ ~1L& LS­

~~~~~~~~

3-~ ~?h,& ~ J ~.

Page 14: S~Z-e,.I : 0

831

60

22.3 Asteroids

.c:50 t::

U.l'" :s'" ~

I40-cJ'" "8 r;; '-oj

30 0 ~.., ~

E ::J 20Z

10 .2 c 2

..;;'" " 0

1.0 5.0 6.0 Semi major axis (AU)

FIGURE 22.13 The distribution of 1796 asteroids in the asteroid belt. Asteroid group names and orbital resonances with Jupiter are also shown. Kirkwood gaps are evident at numerous resonance locations, and enhancements in the number of asteroids are apparent at other resonance locations. (Data from Williams, Asteroids II, Binzel, Gehrels, and Matthews (eds.), University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1989.)

22.3 Asteroids 833

FIGURE 22.15 Trojan asteroids are located in Jupiter's orbit, either leading or trailing the planet by 60°. The occupied positions are two of the five Lagrangian points in the Sun-Jupiter system.

Page 15: S~Z-e,.I : 0

- -- -~. '~r~~' .~. J -~-- J

-1.0 ~--'----r----'r--..,------r------,.--""'------,

L3- l.5

1 L2

i + -2.0 $ 2. e

-2.5

-3 ~2 2-I o x/a

FIGURE 18.2 The effective gravitational potential <P for two stars of mass M, = 0.85 Mo , M2 0.17 Mo on the x-axis. The stars are separated by a distance a = 5 x 108 m = 0.718 Ro , with center of mass located at the origin. The x-axis is in units of a, and <P is expressed in units G(M, + M2 )/ a = 2.71 x 10" J kg-I. (In fact, the figure is the same for any MdM, = 0.2.) dashed line is the value of <P at the inner Lagrangian point. If the total energy per unit mass of particle exceeds this value of <P, it can flow through the inner Lagrangian point between the two

Page 16: S~Z-e,.I : 0

18.1 Gravity in a Close Binary Star System 657

2r'----~----_,------r-----,_-----r----_r----~----_,

-'" >, 0

- 1

-2'~____~____~~____~____~_____L____~____~____~

2-2 -1 o x/a

FIGURE 18.3 Equipotentials for M, = 0.85 Mo, M2 = 0.17 Mo , and a = 5 x 108 m = 0.718 Ro . The axes are in units of a, with the system's center of mass (the " x ") at the origin . Starting atthe top of the figure and moving down toward the center of mass, the values of ¢ in units of G(M, + M 2 )/a = 2.71 x lO" J kg- ' for the equipotential curves are ¢ = -1.875, - 1.768, -1.583, -1.583, - 1.768 (the "dumbbell" ), -1.875 (the Roche lobe), and -3 (the spheres). L4 and Ls are local maxima, with ¢=-J.431.