testing language ability
TRANSCRIPT
TESTING LANGUAGE
ABILITY
Subject: Language Testing
Instructor: Nguyễn Thanh Tùng, Ph.D.
Class: TESOL 2014B
1. Phạm Phúc Khánh Minh 4. Võ Thị Thanh Thư
2. Nguyễn Trần Hoài Phương 5. Đỗ Thị Bạch Vân
3. Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Thành 6. Ngô Thảo Vy
1. A framework of language ability2. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) and its two related projects
CONTENTS
A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE ABILITY
Communicative language ability (CLA):
knowledge/ competence
the capacity for implementing
that competence in appropriate,
contextualized communicative
language use
A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE ABILITY
Three components of the framework of CLA:
1. Language competence
2. Strategic competence
3. Psychophysio- logical mechanisms
A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE
ABILITY1. LANGUAGE COMPETENCE
A set of specific knowledge components that are utilized in communication via language
Two components of language competence:
A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE ABILITY2. STRATEGIC COMPETENCE
The mental capacity for implementing the components of language competence in contextualized communicative language use
The means for relating language competencies to features of the context of situation in which language use takes place and to the language user’s knowledge structures
Three components in strategic competence:
A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE ABILITY
2. STRATEGIC COMPETENCE
• To identify necessary information for realizing a particular communicative goal in a given context
• To determine what language competencies are at our disposal for most effectively bringing that information to bear in achieving the communicative goal
• To ascertain the abilities and shared knowledge of the interlocutor
Assessment
• To retrieve relevant items (grammatical, textual, illocutionary, sociolinguistic) from language competence
• To formulate a plan whose realization is expected to achieve the communicative goal
Planning
• To implement the plan in the modality and channel appropriate to the communicative goal and the context
Execution
The neurological and psycho- logical processes involved in the actual execution of language as a physical phenomenon (sound, light)
Eg. ‘The girl is taller than the boy.’
Visual skill: to gain access to the non-linguistic information in the picture
Auditory skill: to gain access to the information in the administrator’s instructions
Articulatory skill: to pronounce the words correctly and to provide appropriate stress and intonation.
A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE ABILITY3. PSYCHOPHYSIO- LOGICAL MECHANISMS
Describe 6 levels of language ability (A1 – C2) Be used by organizations all over the world Provide a method of learning, teaching, and
assessing
An
internationally
recognized
framework
2. CEFR AND ITS TWO RELATED PROJECTS
2.1. DIALANG PROJECT
2.1.1 The DIALANG assessment system
2.1.2 Purpose of DIALANG
2.1.3 Assessment procedure
2.1.4 Purpose of self-assessment in DIALANG
2.1.1. THE DIALANG ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
DIALANGAn assessment
systemGet diagnostic
information about their proficiency
Language learners
CEF
Self-assessmentLanguage tests
Feedback
2.1.2. PURPOSE OF DIALANG
DIALANG
ADULTS
want to know their level of language proficiency
want to get feedback on the strengths and weaknesses
• provides advice how to improve the language skills
• raises learners’ awareness of learning and proficiency
• does not issue certificates
2.1.3. ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
1. Choice of administration language
2. Registration
3. Choice of test language
4. Vocabulary Size Placement Test
5. Choice of skill (R, L, W, Vocabulary, Structures)
6. Self-assessment (R, L, W)
7. System pre-estimates learner’s ability
8. Test of appropriate difficulty is administrated.
9. Feedback
2.1.4. PURPOSE OF SELF-ASSESSMENT IN DIALANG
#1 Encourage autonomous learning enhance learners’
awareness of their learning process
#2The Vocabulary Size Placement
TestSelf-
assessment results
pre-estimate learners’ ability
direct them to an appropriate test
2.2. ALTE ‘CAN DO’ PROJECT
2.2.1 The ALTE framework
2.2.2 The ALTE ‘Can Dos’ are user-orientated scales
2.2.3 Organization of the ‘Can Do’ statements
2.2.4 Levels of proficiency in the ALTE Framework
2.2.1. THE ALTE FRAMEWORK
A central part of ALTE’s long-term research
Aim at establishing a framework of key levels of language
performance
2.2.2. THE ALTE ‘CAN DOS’ ARE USER-ORIENTATED SCALES
Provide
A useful tool for teaching and testing students a checklist
A basis for developing diagnostic test tasks, activity-based curricula, teaching materials
A means of designing exams about language training and recruitment
2.2.3. ORGANIZATION OF THE ‘CAN DO’ STATEMENTS
400 statements
Social and Tourist
Shopping
Eating out
L/S
R
W
Work
Study
2.2.4. LEVELS OF PROFICIENCY IN THE ALTE FRAMEWORK
Waystage User
Threshold User
Independent User
Competent User
Good User
REFERENCES
Bachman, L. F. (1997). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bộ Giáo dục và đào tạo – Đề án Ngoại ngữ Quốc gia 2020. (2012). Khóa đào tạo, bồi dưỡng chuyên gia khảo thí biên soạn câu hỏi thi Tiếng Anh. Quyển 1. Lăng Cô, Huế.