the collaborative on academic careers in higher education 2010 survey of pre-tenure faculty
Post on 18-Dec-2015
213 views
TRANSCRIPT
COACHE:Demographics of Pre-tenure Faculty
76% UA response rate
All UA RespondentsFull-time UA T/TT Faculty
Male 72%
Female 28% Female
45%Male 55%
“Peer 5 Institutions”Selected by UA
AuburnAlabamaClemsonKansasTennessee
104 “Comparable Institutions”Selected by COACHESector:
– 84 US Public, – 19 US Private, – 1 International
Carnegie:– 38 Very High Research Activity– 25 High Research Activity– 5 Doctoral– 35 Master’s & Baccalaureate
COACHE:Comparison Institutions
COACHE: Major Themes1) Tenure
• Anticipation of Tenure & Tenure Practices• Expectations for Scholarship, Advisor, Colleagueship, etc
2) Nature of Work• Satisfaction – Overall, Teaching & Research
3) Policies & Practices• Institutional & Departmental Support of Work/Life Balance
4) Climate, Culture & Collegiality• Mentoring• Peer Review
5) Compensation & Global Satisfaction• Salary & Benefits• Overall Satisfaction – Department & Institution
•Comparisons – – Overall – UA faculty vs Peer 5– Gender – UA female faculty vs UA male faculty– Diversity – UA diverse faculty vs UA non-diverse
faculty– Academic Discipline – UA disciplines grouped by
subject – Analysis highlights areas of significant difference
COACHE: Analysis
Theme 1- Anticipation of tenure & tenure practices – – UA faculty are less clear about the tenure process,
criteria, standards, and body of evidence needed to achieve tenure
– UA faculty view formal reviews and written summaries to be less effective
– UA Junior faculty are less clear on whether or not they will receive tenure & report less consistency in messages from senior faculty regarding tenure requirements
Overall Results
Theme 2- Reasonableness and clarity of expectations for scholarship, colleagueship, teaching, advising, etc. in regard to earning tenure
– UA faculty are less clear on the expectations of teaching and scholarship
– UA faculty ranked the reasonableness of teaching expectations lower
Overall Results
Theme 2- Overall Satisfaction– UA faculty place greater importance on availability of
professional assistance for improving teaching and are more satisfied with the effectiveness of the assistance compared to Peer 5 faculty
– UA faculty are more satisfied than some Peer 5 faculty with quality of facilities
Theme 2- Research Satisfaction– UA faculty place less importance on professional
assistance in obtaining externally funded grants and view the assistance to be less effective
– UA faculty report less satisfaction with research services
Overall Results
Theme 3- Support of Work/Life Balance– UA faculty report less satisfaction with balance between
professional and personal timeTheme 4- Mentoring– UA faculty report less satisfaction with their level of
professional interaction with other pre-tenure colleagues Theme 5- Salary & Benefits– UA faculty place greater importance on paid/unpaid
leave but rated effectiveness no different than Peer 5 faculty
– UA faculty reported less satisfaction with compensation than faculty at only one peer institution
Overall Results
Theme 1- Anticipation of tenure & tenure practices – – Female faculty view formal reviews and written summaries
to be less effective than male faculty
Theme 2- Overall Satisfaction– Female faculty place greater importance on availability of
professional assistance for improving teaching and are less satisfied with their access to GA’s and TA’s than male faculty
Gender Results
Gender Results
Theme 2- Teaching Satisfaction– Female faculty are more satisfied with:
• The quality of undergraduate students• Their control over course content
Theme 2- Research Satisfaction– Female faculty are less satisfied with amount of time to do
research/creative work
Gender Results
Theme 3- Institutional & Departmental Support of Work/Life Balance– Female faculty place greater importance on:• Having modified duties for family/parental reasons• Availability of PT tenure-track positions
– Female faculty are in less agreement that the institution does what it can to make having and raising children compatible with a tenure-track career
Gender Results
Theme 4- Mentoring– Female faculty report formal mentoring programs to be less
effective
Theme 5- Salary & Benefits– Female faculty place greater importance on the availability of
paid or unpaid personal leave during the pre-tenure period
Theme 5- Overall Satisfaction: Department & Institution– Female faculty plan to stay at the UA longer than male faculty
Diversity Results
Theme 2- Satisfaction with Teaching– Racially or ethnically diverse faculty are less satisfied than
non-diverse faculty with:• The number of courses they teach• Their discretion over course content
Theme 3- Institutional & Departmental Support of Work/Life Balance– Diverse faculty reported modified duties to accommodate
parental and family needs as more effective but there was no difference in level of importance
Diversity Results
Theme 4- Mentoring– Diverse faculty are less satisfied with the intellectual vitality of
pre-tenured faculty in their department than non-diverse faculty
Theme 5- Salary & Benefits– Diverse faculty place greater importance on availability of
financial assistance for housing with respect to their success as a tenure track faculty member
Theme 5- Overall Satisfaction: Department & Institution– Racially non-diverse faculty plan to stay at the UA longer than
diverse faculty
Theme 1- Reasonableness and clarity of expectations for scholarship, colleagueship, teaching, etc. in regard to earning tenure
– Humanities faculty rated the clarity of expectations as a teacher higher than Engineering/Math/Stat/Computer Science faculty
– Business faculty rated the clarity of expectations as a departmental colleague higher than Engineering/Math/ Stat/Computer Science faculty
– Humanities, Business, and Education faculty rated the reasonableness of expectations as a scholar higher than Engineering/Math/Stat/Computer Science faculty
Academic Discipline Results
Academic Discipline Results
Theme 2- Overall Satisfaction– Health and Human Ecology faculty place greater
importance on professional assistance to improve teaching than Business faculty
– Education faculty are more satisfied with computing services than faculty from Engineering/Math/Stat/Computer Science
Academic Discipline Results
Theme 5- Salary & Benefits– Engineering/Math/Stat/Computer Science and Humanities
faculty rated the importance of childcare higher than faculty in Education
Theme 5- Overall Satisfaction: Department & Institution– Business faculty rated opportunities to participate in
institutional level governance higher than faculty from Engineering/Math/Stat/Computer Science
No information on:Academic Area CIP Department or School
Agriculture / Natural Resources / Env Sci
1 Animal Sciences1 Agricultural Economics &
Agribusiness1 Crop, Soil & Environmental Sciences1 Food Science1 Horticulture1 Poultry Sciences
13 Agricultural & Extension Education26 Entomology26 Plant Pathology
Physical Sciences40 Chemistry & Biochemistry40 Geology40 Physics
Visual & Performing Arts
50
Art50 Drama50 Music
Academic Area CIP Department or School
Humanities16 World Languages, Literatures & Cultures38 Philosophy54 History
Social Sciences
42 Psychology44 Social Work45 Anthropology45 Economics45 Geography45 Political Science45 Sociology & Criminal Justice
Biological Sciences 26 Biological Sciences
Engineering / Computer Sci /
Math / Statistics
4 Architecture4 Landscape Architecture
14 Biological & Agricultural Engineering
14 Computer Science/Computer Engineering
14 Civil Engineering14 Electrical Engineering14 Industrial Engineering14 Mechanical Engineering14 Chemical Engineering27 Mathematical Sciences
Health & Human Ecology 19 Human Environmental Sciences
Business
52 Accounting52 Finance52 Information Systems52 Management52 Marketing & Transportation
Education13 Curriculum & Instruction13 Education Reform13 Health/Kinesiology/Recreation/Dance
Medical Schools & Health
Professions
51 Rehabilitation, Human Resources & Communication Disorders
51 Nursing
Other Professions (e.g., Law, Journalism)
9 Communication9 Journalism
22 Law23 English