the economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Thecontents
[2020-03-11]
EuropeLeadersScienceandtechnologyChinaGraphicdetailUnitedStates
![Page 4: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
|Mainmenu|Next|
Europe
AconstitutionalploymaykeepVladimirPutininpoweruntil2036[Mar10th2020]
|Mainmenu|Next|
文章来源于官网电子版由微博@goldinbook整理制作
欢迎加入「厨阅计划」:https://eslpai.com/article/4
QQ:2894535935微信:petunia0326
![Page 5: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
|Mainmenu|Sectionmenu|Next|
Putin’sspecialoperation
AconstitutionalploymaykeepVladimirPutininpoweruntil2036
VLADIMIRPUTINlikestosurprise.Evenmore,helikestoconfuse.AsaformerKGBofficer,heiscomfortableoperatinginfogandobfuscation,particularlywhentwistingthelaw—orevenhatchingapoliticalplot.ThisisessentiallywhatMrPutinhasbeendoingforthetwomonthssinceheannouncedconstitutionalchangesdesignedtokeephimselfinpowerafter2024.Thecurrentconstitutionsayshemustleaveofficethen.AsheindicatedonMarch10th,hehasnointentionofdoingso.
Russianscouldbeforgivenforfeelingconfused.OnMarch6thMrPutintoldthemthathewouldnotrepeattheexperienceoftheSovietleaderswhodiedinoffice.“Ilikemyjob,buttoretainthepowerIhave,[Iwouldhave]toagreetosomeschemethatwouldbeunacceptableforthecountryor...destroyit.”Butfourdayslaterhedidtheopposite,tellingtheDuma(parliament)thatheiswillingtoresettheclockonpresidentialterm-limitsandmaystandagainin2024.Twomoresix-yeartermscouldthuskeepMrPutin—ifhestandsandwins
![Page 6: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
re-election—inthepresidencyuntil2036,whenhewillbe83.
MrPutinhasponderedandprobablyrejectedvariousmethodsofretainingpower:mergingRussiawithBelarusandsopresidingoveranewcountry;presidingoveranempoweredsupremestatecouncil;orbecomingprimeministerinanewparliamentarysystem.Whenconfrontedwithasimilardifficultyin2008,hesimplyswappedjobswithDmitryMedvedev,thenprimeminister.Thistime,heappearstohavechosenthecrudestbutperhapsmostcertainmethod—changingtheconstitutionandremainingpresident.
Hisstatementshavebeenasmurkyastheamendmentstotheconstitution,whichareconfusingandcontradictsomeotherarticles.Hesaidatfirstthattheywouldstrengthenthepowersoftheparliamentandtheregions.Infact,theamendmentsgrantthepresidentnear-absolutepower,furtherreducetheauthorityofelectedmayorsandscraptheprimacyofinternationalnormsoverRussianlaws.Thepower-grabisshroudedinthelanguageofGod,ancestraltraditions,heterosexualfamiliesandsacredvictoryinthesecondworldwar(the75thanniversaryofwhichRussiawillmarkonMay9th).
Yet,forsuchamomentousevent,MrPutin’sgambitperformedbeforetheDuma,lackedpanacheanddrama.Theshowwascontrivedandstale.Inastylisticthrow-backtodeadly-dullCommunistPartycongresses,ValentinaTereshkova,anMPandformerSovietcosmonaut,saidtherewasnopointintryingtoerectcomplicatedpoliticalconstructions.ItwouldbemuchbettertoaskVladimirVladimirovichtostayaspresidentforthegoodofthecountry.
Oncue,theDumaapplauded,andoverwhelminglyvotedfortheamendments.MrPutinisexpectedtosignthemonMarch18th,thesixthanniversaryoftheillegalannexationofCrimea.Takingthefloor,MrPutinlaidoutanextensive,self-servingdefinitionofhisrole.“Thepresidentistheguarantoroftheconstitution,”hesaid,“or,simplyput,theguarantorofthecountry’ssecurity,domesticstabilityand...evolutionarydevelopment.”Evolutionary,because“wehavehadenoughrevolutions.”Heinvokedforeignanddomesticenemies:“Theyarewaitingforustomakeamistakeortoslipup,losingourbearingsor,worsestill,getboggeddownininternaldissent,whichissometimesfanned,fuelledandevenfinancedfromabroad.”
Althoughitwouldbequitewrongsimplytoremovetermlimits,hesaidcasuistically,“liftingrestrictionsagainst...anycitizen,includingthecurrent
![Page 7: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
president,fromtakingpartinanelectioninthefuture”wasquiteadifferentmatter.Naturally,thechangestotheconstitutionwouldhavetobeapprovedbytheConstitutionalCourt,whichhecontrols,aswellasbytheRussianpeople.
Theirassentisscheduledforanotheranniversary:Lenin’sbirthday,onApril22nd.Therewillbean“all-peoplevote”,whichappearstobeneitherareferendumnoranelection,butratheravaguedisplayofsupportwithnobasisinRussianlaw,probablyinvolvingsometelevisedspectacle.Itspurpose,though,istogiveMrPutin’sployanairofspuriouslegality.Andjustincaseanyonewhodisapprovesofhisschemeshouldthinkofprotesting,Moscow’scityauthoritiespromptlybannedanygatheringofmorethan5,000people,citingthecoronavirusoutbreak,atleastuntilApril10th.
MrPutinofferedsomeconsolationtothemanyRussianswhoaresickandtiredofhim,promising:“Ihavenodoubtthatthedaywillcomewhenthesupreme,presidentialpowerinRussiawillnotbesopersonalised.”Hesaidnothingaboutwhenthatdaymaycome.Itmaynotbewithinhislifetime.
|Mainmenu|Sectionmenu|Next|
文章来源于官网电子版由微博@goldinbook整理制作
欢迎加入「厨阅计划」:https://eslpai.com/article/4
QQ:2894535935微信:petunia0326
![Page 8: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
|Previous|Mainmenu|Next|
Leaders
WhyMyanmar’sarmyiswrongtorejectlimitsonitspower[Mar10th2020]
|Previous|Mainmenu|Next|
文章来源于官网电子版由微博@goldinbook整理制作
欢迎加入「厨阅计划」:https://eslpai.com/article/4
QQ:2894535935微信:petunia0326
![Page 9: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
|Previous|Mainmenu|Sectionmenu|Next|
Generalmyopia
WhyMyanmar’sarmyiswrongtorejectlimitsonitspower
WITHGREATpowercomesnoresponsibilitywhatsoever—atleast,forMyanmar’sarmy.Althoughthecountryisintheoryrunbyaciviliangovernment,thearmy,orTatmadaw,retainscontrolofitsownaffairs.Itstopgeneralappointshisownboss,theministerofdefence.Forgoodmeasure,healsogetstopicktheministersoftheinteriorandofbordersecurity,givinghimcontroloverthepolice,intelligenceservicesandborderguards.Thisdoubtlessirkselectedpoliticians,butthereislittletheycandoaboutit,becausethearmyalsochoosesaquarterofthemembersofthenationalandstateparliaments.Thatisenoughtovetoanyamendmentstotheconstitution,includinganychangestotheseoutlandishrules.OnMarch10th,infact,theTatmadaw’sappointeestorpedoedconstitutionalamendmentsproposedbythegovernmentofAungSanSuuKyi,whichwouldhavegraduallyreduceditsrepresentationinparliament,amongotherthings.
Thatisnosurprise,butitisamistake.TheTatmadawmethodicallyerectedthis
![Page 10: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
structurefor13yearsbeforeithandedpowertoMissSuuKyi’sNationalLeagueforDemocracy(NLD)in2016.Itishardtoknowexactlywhatthearmy’sintentionwas,sinceitissuchanopaqueandpricklyinstitution.ButthegeneralsseemtohavewantedtomakeMyanmarmoremodernandrespectable.ThatwouldalsoservetoimproverelationswiththeWest,andsoreducetheirdependenceonChina,botheconomicallyanddiplomatically.Theyappeartohavebeendelightedtopalmoffthedifficultjobofrunningthecountry,butwantedtomakesurethattheirexaltedstatus—andpastconduct—wouldnotbequestioned.Theyintendtoretreatevenfurtherfromthebusinessofgovernment,thehighcommandcontinuestoinsist,onceBurmesedemocracyis“mature”.
Thehitchis,thearmy’sstiflinginfluenceispreventingBurmesedemocracyfrommaturing.Instead,theNLDandtheTatmadawarelockedinadestructivecontest,inwhicheachviestoproveitselfmorepatrioticandclosertotheBamarBuddhistmajoritythantheother.SowhenthearmyembarksonapogromagainsttheRohingyas,ahatedMuslimminority,thegovernmentfeelsobligedtopaperoveritscrimesagainsthumanity.AndwhenMissSuuKyideclaresthatnationalreconciliationishergovernment’smaingoal,thearmystirsupconflictswithotherminoritiestoundermineher.InsteadofMissSuuKyihelpingMyanmarandthearmytolookbetter,asthegeneralshadplanned,thearmyismakingMissSuuKyiandMyanmarlookbad.Westerninvestors,inturn,havetakenflight,increasingMyanmar’sdependenceonChina—again,theoppositeofwhattheTatmadawappearstohaveintended.
Itmightstillbepossible,however,toturnthisviciouscycleintoavirtuousone.MissSuuKyi,afterall,hasprovedthatsheisnotanimplacableenemyoftheTatmadaw—evengoingasfarastravellingtoTheHaguetodefenditsindefensibleconductbeforetheInternationalCourtofJustice.Foritspart,theTatmadawpresumablydidnotspendmorethanadecadeengineeringaformofcivilianruleitfindsacceptableonlytosabotageitsowncreation.Bothsidesseemtohaveacceptedthattheyhavetolivewiththeother.Nowtheyneedtofindawaytogetalongbetter.
Amendingtheconstitutiontoprovidemoreofasemblanceofciviliansupremacyoverthearmedforceswouldbeagoodstart.Thearmycouldcedecontrolofthevarioussecurityministries,forexample,orgiveupitsvotingmajorityonthespecialgovernmentcommitteeempoweredtodeclareastateofemergency.Atonelevel,itwouldbemerelyatokengesture:MissSuuKyisurelyknowsthatthearmywouldnothesitatetostageanothercoupifitfelttrulythreatened.But
![Page 11: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
overtime,thenewrulesmightevolvefrompolitefictionsintoinstitutionalnorms.Moreover,iftheciviliangovernmenthadanycontroloversecurity,thatmightforceit,andtheTatmadaw,tothinkalittlemoredeeplyabouthowtomollifyMyanmar’smanyethnicandreligiousminorities(oratleastavoidanyrepeatsofwhathappenedtotheRohingyas),andthusmakethecountrybothmorepeacefulandmoreunified.Attheveryleast,somesensethatthearmywillnotrunamokmighthelptolurebackWesterninvestors,andthusspeedthecountry’sdevelopmentandrehabilitation.ThealternativeisareversiontothefeudbetweenthearmyanddemocracyactiviststhathasconsumedMyanmarinoneformoranothersincetheTatmadawfirststoppedtheNLDfromtakingpowerbackin1990.Neithersidewantsthat.NordoordinaryBurmese.
|Previous|Mainmenu|Sectionmenu|Next|
文章来源于官网电子版由微博@goldinbook整理制作
欢迎加入「厨阅计划」:https://eslpai.com/article/4
QQ:2894535935微信:petunia0326
![Page 12: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
|Previous|Mainmenu|Next|
Scienceandtechnology
Laserweaponsarealmostreadyforthebattlefield[Mar5th2020]
|Previous|Mainmenu|Next|
文章来源于官网电子版由微博@goldinbook整理制作
欢迎加入「厨阅计划」:https://eslpai.com/article/4
QQ:2894535935微信:petunia0326
![Page 13: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
|Previous|Mainmenu|Sectionmenu|Next|
Militarytechnology
Laserweaponsarealmostreadyforthebattlefield
WHENMARTIANSdescendonEnglandinH.G.Wells’snovel“TheWaroftheWorlds”,publishedin1898,theyincineratetroublesomehumansandlaywastetosuburbantownswithheat-raysthatturnallbeforethemintoa“asmokydanceofluridflames”.Suchraygunshavebeenarecurrentfeatureofscience-fictioneversince.
Despitetheeffortsofmilitarytypes,though,realityhaslaggedfarbehindsci-fi.In1934,tonoavail,Britain’sAirMinistryoffered£1,000toanyonewhocoulduseraysofsomesorttokillasheepatadistanceof180metres.AdecadelateraJapanesedevicethatgeneratedmicrowavesmanagedtosnuffoutarabbitthatwas30metresaway.Butittooktenminutestodoso.Eventheinventionoflasers,in1960,failedtousherintheageofthedirected-energyweapon,asraygunsareknowninthejargon.RonaldReagan’sefforttoweaponiselasersinthe“StarWars”programmeofthe1980swasspectacularlyunsuccessful.
Thistime,however,it’sdifferent,accordingtoKellyHammett,whojoined
![Page 14: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
America’sAirForceResearchLaboratory27yearsago,andnowrunsitsDirectedEnergyDirectorate.“Formyentirecareer,”hesays,“wehavebeenworkingondirectedenergy.We’refinallyatthepointatwhichwe’regoingtoseesystemsthatwillmakeamoresubstantivedifferenceonthebattlefield.”
Zap!
Iftrue,thatwillchangethecostofwar.Atthemoment,shootinganobjectoutoftheskygenerallymeansfiringsomethingexpensiveatit.Iftheobjectisanenemyplaneorsophisticatedballisticmissile,thatisprobablyworthwhile.ButIsrael,forexample,routinelyexpends$50,000interceptorsonhome-maderocketsthatcostabout$1,000.Disparitieslikethismakeiteasyandaffordabletoattempttooverwhelmdefenceswithmissilesalvosordroneswarms.Lasers,bycontrast,arecheaptofireandneverrunoutofammunition.
Laserscomeinmanyvarieties,buttwo,inparticular,havebeenthesubjectofweaponisation.Thesearesolid-statelasersandchemicallasers.Asolid-statelaserworksbystimulatingtheemergenceofalaserbeamfromacrystalorapieceofglassbypumpingenergyintothatsolid.(Thefirstlaserusedarubyasthecrystalandaflashlampasthepump.)Thepowertodothisisprovidedbyanelectriccurrent.Achemicallaser,meanwhile,drawsitsenergyfromreactionsbetweentwoormoresubstancesandusesthatenergytopumpyetanothersubstancetoemitthebeam.
InthefirstdecadeofthecurrentcenturyAmericacameclosetodevelopingachemical-laserweapon.ThiswasahangoverfromStarWars,amegawattdeviceintendedtodestroyintercontinentalballisticmissilesjustaftertheytookoff.Testsconductedin2009weresuccessful.Butthesystemweighed17tonnes,andwassolargethatitrequiredaBoeing747tocarryit.Also,thepumpingreactioninvolvedchlorine,hydrogenperoxideandpotassiumhydroxide,allofwhicharecorrosive—aswasthesubstancebeingpumped,iodine.Thisisnotanidealmixturetohaveonboardaplane.Havingburnedthrough$5bnover16years,theprogrammewasthereforecancelledin2011.
Today’slaserweaponshave,bycontrast,gonedownthesolid-stateroute.AsThomasKarr,whoheadsthePentagon’sworkondirectedenergy,explains,theyusealasertopumpalaser.Themainlaser’score—theequivalentoftheruby—isdopedwithanelementsuchasniobium,togiveitsuitableproperties.Insteadofaflashlamp,thislaserisstimulatedbyalaser-emittingdiode.
![Page 15: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Bypickingtherightcombinationofingredientsforthemainlaser,itsoutputcanbetunedtoanoptimumwavelength—aboutonemicron—thatresultsinanarrow,far-reachingbeamresistanttoabsorptionbywatervapourintheatmosphere.Today’ssolid-statelasersarealsomuchmoreefficientthantheirpredecessors.Athirdoftheelectricitydrivingthemisconvertedintolaserlight,comparedwithjustafewpercentinearliergenerations.Dispensingwithgases,moreover,meanslessplumbingandamorecompactdesign.
Thebreakthroughforsolid-statelaserscamein2014,withthetestingbyAmerica’snavyofonethathadapowerof30kilowatts(kW)—theoutputofanaveragehomeboiler.WhenfittedtoasmallvesselcalledUSSPonceitprovedabletofrythecomponentsandmotorsofnearbydronesandboats.Ponce’scaptainwasthengivenpermissiontouseitforreal,ifheneededto.
Inlightofthissuccessa60kWsystem,similarlyintendedforuse,willbefittedonUSSPreble,adestroyer,laterthisyear.Andanevenmorepotent150kWweaponisundergoingtestsonlargerships.Noraresuchdevicesexclusivelynaval.InFebruarytheAmericanarmysaiditplannedtofielditsfirst“combatrelevant”laser,a50kWweaponthatwouldsitatopStrykerarmouredvehiclesanddefendthemagainstaerialthreats,by2022.
Mirrors,butnosmoke
Militarylasershavealsobenefitedfromprogressinmaterialsscience.Theheat-raysemployedbyWells’sMartiansreliedon“apolishedparabolicmirrorofunknowncomposition”.Theirreal-worldsuccessorssimilarlyusemirrorstocombineandbouncelightwithintheweapon,beforesendingitoutthroughawindowonitswaytoitstarget.Sincelasersconcentratehugeamountsofpowerintosmallareas,thesemirrorshavetobecoatedwithreflectivematerialsthatabsorbaslittleenergyaspossible.Similarly,thecoatingsofthewindowsrequirehigh-transmissionmaterialsthatpermitasmuchenergyaspossibletopass.Bothtypesofcoatinghavecomealonggreatlyinthepast20years,becauseoftheiruseinopticalgyroscopes,whicharefittedwidelyinaeroplanesandships,saysMrKarr.
Anotheradvancehasbeenadaptiveoptics—asetoftechniquesthatusespecialsensorsanddeformablemirrorstocompensate,inreal-time,fordistortionscausedbyEarth’satmosphere(thinkofthetwinklingofstars).Thistechnology,whichenablesmilitarylaserstobeaimedaccurately,waspioneeredinsecret
![Page 16: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
laboratoriesinthe1980sandthendeclassifiedinthe1990s,totheconsiderabledelightofastronomers,whouseittoadjusttheirtelescopes.LastyeartheAmericanairforce’sStarfireOpticalRangeinNewMexicoapproachedindustrytodevelopanewandpowerfulsodiumlaser(onethatenergisesthesodiumatomsinalayeroftheatmospherecalledthemesosphere,tocreateartificial“guidestars”).Thiswouldrefineadaptiveopticsforbothastronomicalandmilitarypurposes.
Thenextchallengeistosouplasersupstillfurther,sotheycantakeaimatlargemissiles,aswellasthesmallonesthatthePrebleandStrykerweaponswillbeaimedat.Thegoal,accordingtoMrKarr,istoachieve300kWby2022and500kWby2024.Thesewillbedemonstrationdevices,ratherthanbattlefield-ready.But,acenturyandaquarterafterWells’svision,itlooksasthoughtheraygunisatlastareality.■
ThisarticleappearedintheScienceandtechnologysectionoftheprinteditionundertheheadline"Theriseoftheraygun"
|Previous|Mainmenu|Sectionmenu|Next|
文章来源于官网电子版由微博@goldinbook整理制作
欢迎加入「厨阅计划」:https://eslpai.com/article/4
QQ:2894535935微信:petunia0326
![Page 17: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
|Previous|Mainmenu|Next|
China
China’spropagandistsaretrappedbytheirownrhetoric[Mar5th2020]
|Previous|Mainmenu|Next|
文章来源于官网电子版由微博@goldinbook整理制作
欢迎加入「厨阅计划」:https://eslpai.com/article/4
QQ:2894535935微信:petunia0326
![Page 18: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
|Previous|Mainmenu|Sectionmenu|Next|
Chaguan
China’spropagandistsaretrappedbytheirownrhetoric
THEREVIEWSarenotyetin,butitissafetosaythat“ABattleAgainstEpidemic:ChinaCombatingcovid-19in2020”hasthemakingsofabestseller.AprojectoverseenbytheCentralPropagandaDepartmentoftheCommunistPartyofChina,theforthcominghardbackisbilledasatributetoPresidentXiJinping’s“outstandingleadership”inthefightagainstthenovelcoronavirus.WithMrXialreadydubbed“CommanderofthePeople’sWar”againstcovid-19byofficialmedia,itwouldbeaboldpartycommitteeorgovernmentofficethatdoesnotorderacopy.Yetthoseeagertoreserveoneinadvancewillneedpatience,becausethevolumehassuddenlyvanishedfromtheonlinecataloguesofthePeople’sPublishingHouse.Whenthebookreturnsinsomeguise,asitdoubtlesswill,thecontentsmayhavechangedquiteabit.Forpropagandachiefsneedtorethinktheirrhetoricaboutcovid-19,sincetheycannothopetoliveuptoit.
SinceJanuaryhundredsofmillionsofChinesehavespentweeksinlocked-downvillagesandtowns,forbiddentomeetfriendsandfamily.Somehavehadto
![Page 19: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
home-schoolchildren.Othersarelivingonsavingsuntiltheirworkplacesre-open.Scanningsocialmediafornews,manynormallyapoliticalcitizenshavebeenangeredbyreportsofofficialcover-upsandincompetence,orbyviralsmartphonevideosofsecurityforcesthuggishlyenforcingquarantines.Thesamecitizenshavethenbeenshockedtoseecontroversialreportsdeletedbeforetheireyesbycensors.
Anxioustorallyafrightenedpublic,Chineseleadersdeclaredall-outwaronthedevilvirussomeweeksago.Itwillend,theypromise,with“acompletewin”.Stateandpartynewsoutletshavecastdoctorsandnursesas“white-cladandfearlesswarriors”.Medicskilledbythevirushavebeenhailedasbattlefieldmartyrs.
ThoughChinahasnothingresemblingafreepress,somemoreindependentvoicescanbeheard,whetherbloggersorafewbig-city,commerciallydrivennewsoutletsthatpushthelimitsofwhatmaybereported.TheepidemichasseennotablybraveworkbyCaixin,abusinesspublicationwhosecommercialbackersincludeTencent,atechnologygiant,andwhichissaidtohavehigh-rankingfans,amongthem(itisrumoured)WangQishan,China’svice-presidentandaformeranti-corruptionchief.ThepublicationhassentseveralteamstoWuhan,thecityatthecentreoftheoutbreak.TheyreportedthatofficialshushedupnewsoftestsconductedinDecemberthatfirstdiscoveredthenewvirusandthensuppressedevidencethatitcouldjumpfromhumantohuman.EditorialsinCaixinhavearguedthattransparencyisthekeytowinningpublictrust,becausesuppressingthetruthfuelspanic.
Caixin’sreportshavebeenrepeatedlydeletedbycensors.Forallthat,andabitunexpectedly,itscallstolevelwiththepublicalsoearnpraisefromsomeinthepartypress.Thatmaybebecausegreaterhonestyistheonlywayoutofthetrapcreatedbyearly,hubristicpromisesoftotalvictory.BackonFebruary20th,whenalmostallconfirmedcasesofcovid-19wereinsidethecountry’sborders,theChinaDailyboasted,“WereitnotfortheuniqueinstitutionaladvantagesoftheChinesesystem,theworldmightbebattlingadevastatingpandemic.”Nowthevirushasbeendetectedinmorethan70countries,and—inthepastfewdays—travellershavebeenfoundreturningtoChinawithinfectionspickedupabroad.Thisvirusisgoingtobearoundforalongtime,perhapsforever.SomeonewillhavetobreakthattotheChinesepublic.
HuXijiniseditor-in-chiefoftheGlobalTimes,abombastictabloidunderthe
![Page 20: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
People’sDaily,theparty’sofficialmouthpiece.MrHunotesthathisownpaper’sreportsexposedinstancesofbunglingbyWuhanofficials.ButheconcedesthatCaixin’s“performanceontheinvestigativefrontreallystoodout”.Caixin’sworkgivesstatemediacausefor“self-reflection”,headds:thegovernmentpress“shouldhaveplayedasupervisingrole”whencity,provincialandnationalhealthofficialsmademistakesatthestartoftheoutbreak.
AskedhowhethinksCaixingotawaywithitslimit-testingreportingduringthiscrisis,MrHudescribesamysteriousprocessbywhichChinesemediaoutletssensethepoliticalcurrentsofthedayandtrytoaligntheirworkwith“whatsocietyneeds”atthatmoment,asheputsit.Enterthecurrentattherighttimeandsuccesscanfollow,heexplains.“Ifsometimesyoumiss,theresultsmightbeverydifferent.”
AprovocateurwhorelishesexplainingtoWesternreportershowwrongtheyare,MrHuissereneaboutthechallengeofadmittingthatvirusoutbreaksmaycontinuelongafterChinaeasesstrictquarantinerules.“Ifweneedtochangestrategy,wecanchangeanytime,”theeditorsays,venturingthattheChinesearepractical,wanttogobacktoworkandliveinacountrywithbetterviruscontrolsthan“high-risk”France,Germany,ItalyorSouthKorea.“Theywanttoberidofthevirus.Butifitcan’tbedefeated,weneedtoacceptthattoo.”
Whenindoubt,lashout
Truetonationalisticform,inrecentdaystheGlobalTimeshasaccusedWesternnationsoffailingtolearnfromChina’sresolutepolicies,astheworldpreparesfora“protractedwar”againstthevirus.Tut-tuttingaboutthecostofhealthcareinAmerica,thetabloidasked,“Ifasuperpowerfailstocontrolcovid-19simplybecausemanypeoplecannotaffordtreatment,thencanthatcountryreallybegreatagain?”
China’stopleadersaremoresubtleabouttheirblame-sharing,butstillatpainstonotethatvirus-controlisnowacollective,globalchallenge.MeetingscientistsonMarch2ndMrXitalkedof“humanity’sbattleagainstdiseases”andofthetasksfacingallmankind.SuchlanguageisnotasstirringasbooksaboutChinasingle-handedlysavingtheworld.ButrightnowthetaskissellingsomethingshortoftotalvictorytoafrightenedChinesepublic,manyofwhomdistrustofficialassurancesaboutpublichealth.Blamingtheworldisagoodstart.■
![Page 21: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
ThisarticleappearedintheChinasectionoftheprinteditionundertheheadline"Totalincredulity"
|Previous|Mainmenu|Sectionmenu|Next|
文章来源于官网电子版由微博@goldinbook整理制作
欢迎加入「厨阅计划」:https://eslpai.com/article/4
QQ:2894535935微信:petunia0326
![Page 22: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
|Previous|Mainmenu|Next|
Graphicdetail
Politicalprotestshavebecomemorewidespreadandmorefrequent[Mar10th2020]
|Previous|Mainmenu|Next|
文章来源于官网电子版由微博@goldinbook整理制作
欢迎加入「厨阅计划」:https://eslpai.com/article/4
QQ:2894535935微信:petunia0326
![Page 23: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
|Previous|Mainmenu|Sectionmenu|Next|
Dailychart
Politicalprotestshavebecomemorewidespreadandmorefrequent
FORMANYWesterners,thementionofmass-protestmovementsconjuresimagesoflong-hairedyouthdemonstratingagainsttheVietnamwarin1968,orthetopplingoftheBerlinWallin1989.Buttheworldhasexperiencedmorepoliticaluprisingsinthepastfewyearsthaneverbefore.In2019alonetherewereprotestsoneverycontinentandacross114countries—fromHongKongtoHaiti,BoliviatoBritain.
Suchunrestispartofagrowingtrend,accordingtoanewreportbyresearchersattheCenterofStrategicandInternationalStudies(CSIS),aWashington-basedthink-tank.UsingdatafromtheGlobalDatabaseofEvents,Language,andTone—arepositoryofnewsarticles—SamuelBrannen,ChristianHaigandKatherineSchmidtfoundthatthenumberofmassprotestsgloballyhasincreasedby11.5%peryear,onaverage,since2009.(Massprotestsaredefinedasciviliananti-governmentprotests,regardlessofsize,andexcludingriotsandprotestsagainstnon-stateentities).Evenafteradjustingforpopulationgrowth,theauthors
![Page 24: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
reckonthatthenumberofdemonstratorswhohavetakentothestreetsinrecentyearsexceedsthatofeithertheanti-VietnamWarmovementortheCivilRightsmovement.
Recentprotests,despitetheirlargenumbers,seemmoredisparatethanthoseofthepast.Manysharesimilarthemes—includingsloweconomicgrowth,climatechangeandgovernmentcorruption—butaresparkedbylocalevents.InHongKongproteststriggeredbyabillallowingcriminalsuspectstobeextraditedtomainlandChinaspiralledintoabroaderstruggleagainsttheChinesegovernment’sinfluence.InChiledemonstrationsfuelledbyamodestriseinsubwayfaresbroadenedintoangeraboutinequalityandthecostofliving.Resultshavebeenmixed.Somehavebroughtaboutchangesingovernment;othershavebeenmetwithbrutalrepression.
Smartphonesandsocialmediahaverevolutionisedthewayinwhichdemonstrationsareorganised,advertisedandsustained.(Manygovernments,includingthoseofIndia,Pakistan,SyriaandTurkey,haverespondedtounrestbyshuttingdowntheinternet.)Suchtoolsalsoaidthespreadofinformation,bothrealandfake,deepeningexistingpoliticaldivides.Noneoftheseconditionsarelikelytochangesoon.Massprotestshaveexistedforcenturies.Buttheirincreasedfrequencymaybeheretostay.
|Previous|Mainmenu|Sectionmenu|Next|
文章来源于官网电子版由微博@goldinbook整理制作
欢迎加入「厨阅计划」:https://eslpai.com/article/4
QQ:2894535935微信:petunia0326
![Page 25: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
|Previous|Mainmenu|
UnitedStates
InMichigan,JoeBidendealsalethalblowtoBernieSanders[Mar11th2020]
|Previous|Mainmenu|
文章来源于官网电子版由微博@goldinbook整理制作
欢迎加入「厨阅计划」:https://eslpai.com/article/4
QQ:2894535935微信:petunia0326
![Page 26: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
|Previous|Mainmenu|Sectionmenu|
Nowheretogo
InMichigan,JoeBidendealsalethalblowtoBernieSanders
IN1987,WHILEhewasmayorofBurlington,Vermont,BernieSandersreleasedanalbumoffolksongsandpoemstitled“WeShallOvercome”.TherecordincludedanthemsevocativeofadeepAmericanasuchas“ThisLandIsYourLand”,butalsoCivilRightsballadslike“OhFreedom”.ThealbumbecamepopularamongMrSanders’ssupportersduringthe2016primaryDemocraticpresidentialprimary,embodyinghislong-standingdevotiontoprogressiveideasaboutraceandcivilrights,alongwithhisvintageleftybeliefsaboutthestate’sresponsibilitytoprovideequality.(Hissingingabilitiesprobablyplayedlessofafactorinthealbum’ssuccess.)
Despitehisfolksyappeal,MrSanderswasunabletowintheDemocraticParty’spresidentialnominationthatyear.Votersseemtohavedecidedonasimilarfateforhimthistimearound.AfterbrieflyleadingtheprimaryraceinFebruary,theVermontsenatorsufferedaseveresetbackonSuperTuesdayonMarch3rd,asvotersdeliveredaseriesofdecisivevictoriesforhismaincompetitor,JoeBiden,
![Page 27: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
across14states.MrSandersthuslimpedintothisweek’sroundtrailingtheformervice-presidentbyroughly80delegates,accordingtoTheEconomist’sprojections.OnMarch10thMrBidendealtthefinalblow.MrSanderslostinMichigan,wherehewonin2016,bymorethan15percentagepoints.HealsolostinMissouriandMississippi(whichhelostin2016)andinIdaho(whichhewon).
TheresultsinMichiganareparticularlyroughforMrSanders.In2016hissurprisevictoryinthestateoverHillaryClintonwasanimportantwinforacampaignthathadstruggledtobuildawinningcoalition.Hehadlostthemajorityoftheprimariesandcaucusesheldthepreviousweek,andtrailedbehindMrsClintonby156delegates(farworsethanhispositionthisweek).Yetdespitetheodds—pollshadhimdownby20percentagepoints—hewonthestate,breathingnewlifeintohiscampaign.VictoryinMichigancamethankstohissupportfromworking-classwhites,whofavouredhimbylargemarginsoverMrsClinton,andbyyoungpeople.MrSanders’sprotectionisttradepoliciesmayhavebeenparticularlypopularindecliningpost-industrialcitiessuchasGrandRapidsandKalamazoo.
MuchofthatSanders2016coalitiondidnotstickwithhimthisyear.Inpost-industrialKentCounty(whichsurroundsGrandRapids),hisvotesharefellby18pointscomparedwiththelastelection.InKalamazooCounty,itfellby17points.MrSanders’slossesinbothplaceswerelargerthanhis13-pointdropstate-widerelativetohis2016result.
Itwasthewhite,working-classvotersintheseareaswhodealttheultimateblowtoMrSanders’scandidacy.Cracksinhisbasehadalreadybeguntoshow—suburbanitesandyoungvotershadfailedtoturnoutforhiminSuperTuesdaystatesintherevolutionarynumbersthathehaslongpromised.ButuntilnowitwasnotclearwhetherdowntroddenRustbeltwhiteswouldgivehimenoughsupporttokeephishopesalive.Evidently,theydidnot.AcrossMichigan,hisvoteshareslippedbylargeramountsincountieswithhigherconcentrationsofwhiteadultswhohavenocollegedegrees.Itplunged,too,inthesparselypopulatedareasofthestate(seechart).Althoughthesevoterswerewillingtocasttheirballotsforaself-describedsocialistin2016,thatwasprobablybecausetheydislikedMrsClintonmore.Giventhechoicebetweenalesscontroversialmoderateandfar-leftideologue,theypickedthemoderate.
Theprimaryisallbutovernow.MrBidenemergesfromthelatestcontestswith
![Page 28: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
a145-delegateleadoverMrSanders,accordingtoTheEconomist’sprojectionsofhowremainingdelegateswillbeallocatedfromstatesthathavenotyetreportedfully.Barringanunforeseendisaster,MrBidenwillprobablygoontowinalargemajorityofdelegatesinnextweek’scontests.PollsputhimaheadinArizona,Florida,IllinoisandOhio—worth577delegatesintotal.
MrSanders’scampaignwillnothavebeenfornought.Hehaspushedthepartytotheleftonmanyoftheissueshecaresaboutmost,forinstanceguaranteeinghealthcareforall.ButhisdemiseshowsDemocratsjustdidnotbelievehecouldbeatPresidentDonaldTrump.
Digdeeper:
SignupandlistentoChecksandBalance,ournewnewsletterandpodcastonAmericanpoliticsExploreourguidetotheUS2020elections
|Previous|Mainmenu|Sectionmenu|
文章来源于官网电子版由微博@goldinbook整理制作
欢迎加入「厨阅计划」:https://eslpai.com/article/4
QQ:2894535935微信:petunia0326
![Page 29: The Economist 2020-03-11...president, from taking part in an election in the future” was quite a different matter. Naturally, the changes to the constitution would have to be approved](https://reader033.vdocuments.pub/reader033/viewer/2022041916/5e6a036a9376943084363ebc/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
About
Thisebookismadebyeslpai.com,forprivateuseonly.Ifyouhaveanyquestions,pleasesendaprivatemessagetoWeibo@goldinbook.
本杂志来源于官网电子版由微博@goldinbook整理制作
欢迎加入「厨阅计划」:https://eslpai.com/article/4
QQ:2894535935微信:petunia0326