the electron self-energy in the green’s-function approach

32
The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach: Beyond the GW Approximation Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 1 Yasutami Takada Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8581, Japan Benascue Center for Science, Spain 09:50-10:40, 12 September 2008 Kashiwa Campus, Univ. of Tokyo ISSP

Upload: others

Post on 24-May-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach: Beyond the GW Approximation

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 1

Yasutami Takada Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo

5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8581, Japan Benascue Center for Science, Spain

09:50-10:40, 12 September 2008 Kashiwa Campus, Univ. of Tokyo

ISSP

Page 2: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 2

1. Introduction ○ Hedin’s theory: Self-consistent set of equations for G, Σ, W, Π, and Γ ○ GW scheme for Σ

2. Vertex Function ○ Introducing “the ratio function” ○ Averaging the irreducible electron-hole effective interaction ○ Exact functional form for Γ and an approximation scheme for Γ

3. Beyond GW Scheme ○ GWΓ scheme for Σ

4. Illustration in the Low-Density Electron Liquid ○ Comparison with experiment: ARPES and the problem of occupied

bandwidth of the Na 3s band

5. Summary and Outlook for Future cf. YT, PRL87, 226402 (2001); YT & H. Yasuhara, PRL89, 216402 (2002).

Page 3: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 3

L. Hedin: Phys. Rev. 139, A796 (1965)

Φ[G]: Luttinger-Ward energy functional, defined in terms of V

Page 4: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 4

In actual calculations, it is very often the case that Γ is taken as unity, neglecting the vertex correction altogether (do not solve the BS equation).  GW approximation ( Kerstin Hummer’s talk)

Even the self-consistent iterative procedure is abandoned.

 G0W0 (one-shot GW) calculation

V(q)=4πe2/q2

Page 5: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 5

Scalar and vector vertex functions: Γ and Γ

γ : bare vector (or velocity) vertex : combined notation

This determines not only the scalar part Γ but also the vector part Γ, by just changing the bare vertices.

Page 6: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 6

Those vertex functions satisfy the Ward identity, representing the conservation of local electron number (or the gauge invariance):

In the GW approximation, this basic law is not respected, simply because only the corrections in Σ are included.

This relation is important, because the irreducible EH effective interaction is not included explicitly.

Page 7: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

1. Introducing “the ratio function”:

2. Introducing “the average of the irreducible electron-hole effective interaction”:

3. Exact relation between and

4. Exact functional form for in terms

of

5. Approximation to this functional form Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 7

Steps to derive a useful functional form for Γ

Page 8: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 8

10 Definition: Ratio between the scalar vertex and the longitudinal part of the vector vertex

20 Represent the vertex functions in terms of R(p+q,p):

30 Basic strategy: Make an approximation for both Γ and Γ through R(p+q,p), which automatically guarantees the Ward identity.

  combination with the Ward identity

Page 9: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 9

10 Definition:

20 Rewrite the Bethe-Salpeter equation using as

30 Accurate functional form for Γ(p+q,p):

-Π(q)

give R(p+q,p) and then calculate Γ through the previous equation for Γ:

Page 10: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 10

10 Assume

20 Dielectric Function

: RPA

: Local Field Correction

: GWΓ

V(q)=4πe2/q2

put this form into the definition of Π(q), leading to

Page 11: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

This function has been intuitively introduced and discussed by: G. Niklasson, PRB10, 3052 (1974); G. Vignale, PRB38, 6445 (1988); C. F. Richardson and N. W. Ashcroft, PRB50, 8170

(1994). Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 11

Rewrite ΠWI(q):

ΠWI(q) is reduced to “the modified Lindhard function”:

Page 12: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 12

Choose with using the modified local field correction G+(q,iωq) in the Richardson-Ashcroft form [PRB50, 8170 (1994)].

This G+(q,iωq) is not the usual one, but is defined for the true particle or in terms of ΠWI(q). Accuracy in using this G+(q,iωq) was well assessed by M. Lein, E. K. U. Gross, and J. P. Perdew, PRB61, 13431 (2000).

Page 13: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 13

◎ Original GWΓ scheme [YT, PRL87, 226402 (2001)]: (1) Time consuming in calculating Π (2) Difficulty associated with the divergence of Π at rs=5.25 where κ diverges in the electron gas.

Page 14: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

・ Density Response Function Qc(q,ω)

・ Monte Carlo data at ω=0: S. Moroni, D. M.

Ceperley, and G. Senatore, PRL75, 689 (1995).

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 14

Page 15: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 15

YT, PRL89, 226402 (2001); Int. J. Mod. Phys. B15, 2595

(2001).

Note: This Σ(p,ω) is shifted by µxc. ・Nonmonotonic behavior of the life time of the quasiparticle

(related to the onset of the Landau damping of plasmons) ・Plasmon satellites (Plasmaron)

Page 16: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 16

Exact results at half filling

Effect of broadening: ω ω+iγ

 Basically the same shape.

Page 17: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 17

Inelastic electron mean free path: l Important in all kinds of surface electron spectroscopy

lp-1 = -2ImΣ(p,Ep)/vp; E=Ep

Page 18: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 18

cf. EPX (Effective-Potential Expansion)

data: YT & H. Yasuhara, PRB44, 7879 (1991); P. Gori-Giorgi & P. Ziesche, PRB66,

235116 (2002)

Page 19: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 19

 Effective mass m* of the quasiparticle is about the same as that of a free electron m, but a little smaller than

m (m*/m < 1)

Page 20: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 20

The shape of Σ is similar, But its magnitude is much enhanced

Page 21: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 21

m*/m > 1 for p<pF correlation effect dominates; m*/m < 1 for p>pF exchange effect dominates.

Page 22: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 22

ReΣ(p,Ep) and ImΣ(p,Ep) •  ReΣ increases monotonically. very slight widening of the bandwidth • ReΣ is fairly flat for p<1.5pF reason for success of LDA • ReΣ is in proportion to 1/p for p>2pF and it can never be neglected at p=4.5pF where Ep=66eV. (interacting electron-gas model)

No abrupt changes in Σ(p,ω).

Page 23: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Although it cannot be seen In the RPA, the structure a can be clearly seen, which represents the electron-hole multiple scattering (or excitonic) effect.

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 23

YT and H. Yasuhara,PRL89, 216402 (2002).

Page 24: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 24

YT, J. Superconductivity 18, 785 (2005).

Page 25: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 25

Consequence: Nanoscale density fluctuations & MIT in the fluid alkali metals near the liquid-gas critical point cf. K. Matsuda et al., PRL 98, 096401 (2007); H. Maebashi & YT, cond-mat/0807.1454

Page 26: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 26

Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy

Observation of photo electron ejected by soft x-ray(20-40eV) Direct observation of quasiparticle

Conventional assumption: The final state is well described by “the free-electron model”

Page 27: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

In-Whan Lyo & E. W. Plummer, PRL60, 1558 (1988)

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 27

Na (110) with photon energy ω = 16-66 eV

Bandwidth narrowing by 18%

rs = 4 EF = 3.13eV

This is quantitatively reproduced by the GW approximation: regarded as Hallmark of GW

Page 28: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

H. Yasuhara, S. Yoshinaga, & M. Higuchi, PRL83, 3250 (1999)

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 28

Based on this model, the bandwidth is not narrowed.

Compared my fully self-consistent result of Σ(p,ω) with properly including the vertex corrections

Yasuhara’s calculation of the self-energy is not a self-consistent one, violating some sum-rules; an important question raised by Ku, Eguiluz, & Plummer, PRL85, 2410 (2000).

Yasuhara claims that the final states of energies less than about 100 eV should be considered as “an interacting electron-gas model”.

Page 29: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 29

Analysis of ARPES in terms of the interacting electron-gas model for the final state The experimental data analyzed on the free-electron model should be compared with Ep

vir, defined by

•  Final state should be analyzed with using the interacting electron-gas model. • Actual bandwidth of Na is not narrowed but slightly widened. clear indication of the flaw of GW.

Page 30: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

◎ Need to calculate: (1) ΠWI(q) Π0(q) in GW cf. F. Aryasetiawan and O. Gunnarsson, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 237 (1998). (2) I(q) fxc(q,ω) in TDDFT cf. L. Reining et al. PRL94, 186402(2005) ; PRB72, 125203 (2005).

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 30

Page 31: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

◎ In insulators:

cf. YT, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 54, 1779 (1993) ; PRB52, 12708, 12720 (1995).

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 31

Inclusion of ΓWI will give correct excitation energies, while GW does not. (Note that spectrum strengths are not always correct in this GISC approximation.)

Page 32: The Electron Self-Energy in the Green’s-Function Approach

Self-Energy beyond the GW Approximation (Takada) 32

10 Suggested a useful functional form for the vertex function Γ. 20 Given an important message that ARPES should be not analyzed in terms of a free-electron model but an interacting electron-gas model. 30 Shown that the occupied bandwidth of sodium is not narrowed but slightly widened, which cannot be reproduced in the GW approximation. 40 Some new physics is discussed in the low-density electron liquid, including the anomalous dielectric response and the metal-insulator transition.