the first in situ organosulfonate-templated 3-fold interpenetrating framework built from rare...
TRANSCRIPT
Dynamic Article LinksC<CrystEngComm
Cite this: CrystEngComm, 2011, 13, 3895
www.rsc.org/crystengcomm PAPER
Publ
ishe
d on
11
Apr
il 20
11. D
ownl
oade
d by
ME
DIC
AL
RE
SEA
RC
H C
OU
NC
IL L
AB
OR
AT
OR
Y O
F M
OL
EC
UL
AR
BIO
LO
GY
on
24/1
0/20
14 1
9:20
:07.
View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
The first in situ organosulfonate-templated 3-fold interpenetrating frameworkbuilt from rare tetrahedral [Cu4(m4-SO4)] SBUs†
Zhao-Peng Deng, Zhi-Biao Zhu, Xian-Fa Zhang, Li-Hua Huo,* Hui Zhao and Shan Gao*
Received 14th January 2011, Accepted 17th March 2011
DOI: 10.1039/c1ce05059a
An interpenetrating framework, [Cu4(SO4)(4,4-bipy)4]n$2n(C6H5SO4) [4,40-bipyridine ¼ 4,40-bipy], has
been successfully synthesized via hydrothermal reaction, in which the in situ generated p-
hydroxybenzenesulfonate as guests are encapsulated within the channels. The tetrahedral [Cu4(m4-SO4)]
SBUs, reported for the first time in 3D architectures, are linked by parallel double 4,40-bipys to generate
a diamondoid network formed of large adamantanoid cages which causes the 3-fold interpenetration of
the networks by self-clathration. Furthermore, the existence of strong p/p interactions between
adjacent 4,40-bipys stabilizes the interpenetrating framework. The binding energies of the Cu 2p3/2 level
in the XPS spectrum are typical for a Cu(I) oxidation state. For the O1s, the XPS spectrum could be
deconvoluted into three peaks corresponding to the three kinds of O atoms with different chemical
environments. This work provides a method for constructing in situ organosulfonate-templated
interpenetrating metal–organic frameworks.
Introduction
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted considerable
interest because of their potential applications and intriguing
variety of topologies and entanglement motifs.1 Interpenetration,
as the most investigated type of entanglement, has provided
a long-standing fascination.2–4 From a structural point of view,
although mutual interpenetration of the networks usually fills up
potential cavities and reduces porosity, excellent gas adsorption
capacity has been proven possible for interpenetrated coordi-
nation networks.5 Materials with interpenetrating lattices can
have free volumes that exceed 80% of the total volume,6 and
some researchers proved interpenetration could be utilized to
strengthen the interaction between the gaseous molecule and the
framework by an entrapment mechanism.7 Thus, inter-
penetrating networks, with their diverse topologies and struc-
tural features, represent one of the most amazing subjects in
crystal engineering of MOFs.
The interpenetrating diamondoid network is the most
common form of interpenetration,3 in which the encapsulated
guests contain solvent molecules (e.g. H2O, MeOH, toluene,
CH2Cl2), inorganic anions (e.g. Cl�, NO3�, ClO4
�, BF4�, PF6
�,
Key Laboratory of Functional Inorganic Material Chemistry, Ministry ofEducation, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, P. R. China.E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; Fax: (+86) 0451-86608040; Tel: (+86) 0451-86609148
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Additionalfigures, IR spectra, TG curve, as well as PXRD patterns for complex 1.CCDC reference number 802842. For ESI and crystallographic data inCIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c1ce05059a
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
SbF6�, AsF6
�), as well as organic amine cations (e.g. triethyl-
amine, triethylenetetramine, 3-dimethylaminopropylamine).
Recently, Wang and co-workers have presented a polyrotaxane
framework formed by molecular squares threading on a 2-fold
interpenetrated diamondoid skeleton, which encapsulated pol-
yoxometalates (POMs) as guests.8 Zhang et al. reported the
only 2-fold interpenetrated diamondoid net templated by the
organic enantiopure D-Hcam (D-camphoric acid) monoanions.9
By contrast, the interpenetrating diamondoid frameworks
encapsulated in situ generated organic anion as template have
not been reported to date. In this sense, 5-sulfosalicylate, with
three functional groups, provides a huge potential ability for in
situ ligand synthesis.10 It has been demonstrated that the 5-
sulfosalicylate can be decarboxylated in the Cd(II) complex in
the presence of chelating neutral ligand.11 In general, chemical
decarboxylation reactions often require extensive heating in
high boiling solvents and copper salts are often added as
catalysts.12 Based on this conception, we present herein the
hydrothermal synthesis and single-crystal X-ray structure of the
first in situ organosulfonate-templated 3-fold interpenetrating
diamondoid framework with rare tetrahedral [Cu4(m4-SO4)]
SBU, namely, {[Cu4(4,40-bipy)4(SO4)]n$2n(C6H5SO4)} (4,40-bipy
¼ 4,40-bipyridine), (1), in which the organosulfonate is in situ
generated from the decarboxylation of the 5-sulfosalicylic acid.
It should be noted that the tetrahedral [Cu4(m4-SO4)] SBU in 1
with each oxygen bonded to only one metal is detected for the
first time in a 3D architecture (excluding the inorganic
networks formed only by metals and sulfate). Such a conclu-
sion is also demonstrated by a CSD13 research, which reveals
that only three 3D frameworks (two with cadmium14 and one
CrystEngComm, 2011, 13, 3895–3899 | 3895
Publ
ishe
d on
11
Apr
il 20
11. D
ownl
oade
d by
ME
DIC
AL
RE
SEA
RC
H C
OU
NC
IL L
AB
OR
AT
OR
Y O
F M
OL
EC
UL
AR
BIO
LO
GY
on
24/1
0/20
14 1
9:20
:07.
View Article Online
with lanthanum15) and one 1D copper(II) complex16 involving
m4-SO4 have been reported.
Experimental
Materials and methods
All chemicals and solvents were of A. R. grade and used without
further purification in the syntheses. Elemental analyses were
carried out with a Vario MICRO from Elementar Analy-
sensysteme GmbH, and the infrared spectrum (IR) was recorded
from KBr pellets in the range of 4000–400 cm�1 on a Bruker
Equinox 55 FT–IR spectrometer. Powder X-ray diffraction
(PXRD) patterns were measured at 293 K on a Bruker D8
diffractometer (Cu-Ka, l ¼ 1.54059 �A). The TG analyses were
carried out on a Perkin Elmer TG/DTA 6300 thermal analyzer
under flowing N2 atmosphere, with a heating rate of 10 �Cmin�1.
The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were
recorded on a KRATOS AXIS ULTRA DLD equipped with
monochromated Al-Ka radiation. For the calculation of the
binding energies, the C 1s peak of the C–(C,H) component at
284.6 eV was used as an internal standard.
Synthesis of [Cu4(SO4)(4,4-bipy)4]n$2n(C6H5SO4) (1)
Amixture of CuSO4$5H2O (0.50 g, 2 mmol), 5-sulfosalicylic acid
(0.44 g, 2 mmol), 4,40-bipy (0.31 g, 2 mmol), H2O (10 mL), and
methanol (5 mL) was heated in a 25 mL stainless steel reactor
with a Teflon liner at 120 �C for 48 h. Brown crystals of 1 suitable
for X-ray diffraction were isolated in 79% yield (based on Cu
atom). Anal. calcd for C52H42N8O12S3Cu4: C 47.27, H 3.20, N
8.48%. Found: C 47.25, H 3.23, N 8.46%. IR(v/cm�1): 3419m,
1602s, 1558m, 1531m, 1482m, 1417s, 1216s, 1166s, 1124s, 1031m,
817m, 800m, 700m, 617m, 568m.
Table 1 Crystal data and structure refinement parameters of complex 1
1
Empirical formula C52H42N8O12S3Cu4Mr/g mol�1 1321.28Crystal system MonoclinicSpace group C2/ca/�A 10.628(2)b/�A 35.255(7)c/�A 15.059(3)a/� 90.00b/� 110.50(3)g/� 90.00V/�A3 5285(2)Z 4Dc/mg m�3 1.658m/mm�1 1.777q range 3.11–27.40Reflections collected 21 877Unique reflections 6004Observed reflections 4783No. of parameter 371F(000) 2672R1, wR2 [I > 2s(I)] 0.0698, 0.1832R1, wR2 [all data] 0.0854, 0.1977GOF 1.043Largest peak and hole/e A�3 0.840 and �0.559
3896 | CrystEngComm, 2011, 13, 3895–3899
X-Ray crystallographic measurements
Table 1 provides a summary of the crystal data, data collection
and refinement parameters for the complex 1. The diffraction
data from crystal of complex 1 were collected at 295 K on
a RIGAKU RAXIS-RAPID diffractometer with graphite
monochromatized Mo-Ka (l ¼ 0.71073 �A) radiation in u scan
mode. Structure was solved by direct method and difference
Fourier syntheses. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined by full-
matrix least-squares techniques on F2 with anisotropic thermal
parameters. The hydrogen atoms attached to carbons were
placed in calculated positions with C–H ¼ 0.93 �A and U (H) ¼1.2Ueq (C) in the riding model approximation. The p-hydroxy-
benzenesulfonates are disordered over two positions with 50%
occupancy. The vibration of the atoms of the two parts are made
isotropic by an ISOR restraint. All calculations were carried out
with the SHELXL97 program. The CCDC reference number is
802842. Selected bond distances and angles for complex 1 are
presented in Table 2.
Results and discussion
Crystal structure of complex 1
Single-crystal X-ray analysis reveals that the molecular structure
of complex 1 consists of two Cu(I) ions, two 4,40-bipyridine (4,40-bipy) molecules, half of one crystallographically independent
sulfate anion and one uncoordinated p-hydroxybenzenesulfonate
(Fig. 1). The two Cu(I) ions, which are formed through the
reduction of Cu(II) ions under hydrothermal conditions,17 exhibit
distorted trigonal geometry, being made up of two nitrogen
atoms from two different 4,40-bipy molecules and one oxygen
atom from sulfate anion. The Cu–O and Cu–N bond lengths
around Cu1 ion are somewhat longer than those of Cu2 ion.
Both the angles of the two Cu(I) ions, ranging from 98.23(14) to
153.46(16)�, are obviously deviated from the ideal trigonal
geometry (Table 2). The sulfate anions with the m4-h1:h1:h1:h1
coordination mode bridge adjacent four Cu(I) ions to form a rare
tetrahedral [Cu4(m4-SO4)] SBU, which are further linked by
parallel double 4,40-bipys to generate a diamondoid network
formed of large adamantanoid cages (Fig. 2). Strong p/p
interactions can be detected between the two 4,40-bipys with the
centroid to centroid distance of 3.578 �A. The adamantanoid cage
exhibits maximum dimensions (the longest intracage distances)
of 35.3 � 28.2 � 31.9 �A3 (Fig. 3). Such a large cavity causes the
3-fold interpenetration of the networks by self-clathration as
shown in Fig. 4, which are stabilized by p/p interactions with
centroid to centroid distance of 3.674 �A. According to the clas-
sification defined by Blatov et al.,18 the present interpenetrated
network belongs to Class Ia, where only one interpenetration
Table 2 Selected bond distances (�A) and angles (�) for 1a
Cu(1)–(N(2)i 1.931(3) Cu(2)–(N(3) 1.919(3)Cu(1)–(N(1) 1.942(3) Cu(2)–(N(4)ii 1.931(3)Cu(1)–(O(1) 2.353(3) Cu(2)–(O(2) 2.308(3)N(2)i–Cu(1)–(N(1) 151.52(16) N(3)–(Cu(2)–(N(4)ii 153.46(16)N(2)i–Cu(1)–(O(1) 110.07(15) N(3)–(Cu(2)–(O(2) 106.96(15)N(1)–(Cu(1)–(O(1) 98.23(14) N(4)ii–Cu(2)–(O(2) 99.35(15)
a Symmetry code: i, x � 1/2, �y + 1/2, z + 1/2; ii, x + 1, �y + 1, z + 1/2.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Fig. 1 Molecular structure of 1, showing the coordination environments
around the copper(I) centers and the bridging mode of the SO42� anion
(hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity).
Fig. 2 Dia topology (bottom) of 1 with the tetrahedral [Cu4(m4-SO4)]
SBUs and 4,40-bipy spacers (top).
Fig. 3 A single adamantanoid cage with the maximum dimensions
(corresponding to the longest intracage S/S distances) of 35.3 � 28.2 �31.9 �A3.
Fig. 4 A schematic view of the 3-fold interpenetration in 1.
Publ
ishe
d on
11
Apr
il 20
11. D
ownl
oade
d by
ME
DIC
AL
RE
SEA
RC
H C
OU
NC
IL L
AB
OR
AT
OR
Y O
F M
OL
EC
UL
AR
BIO
LO
GY
on
24/1
0/20
14 1
9:20
:07.
View Article Online
vector can be found. An analysis by TOPOS19 reveals that one
dia network is related to the other two by a single translational
vector, [100] of 10.63 �A.
Notably, even with this interpenetration, the framework is still
highly open, containing three-directional channels of approxi-
mately 15.1 � 5.5, 10.6 � 5.6 and 10.6 � 6.4 �A along the [100],
[001] and [101] directions, respectively (ESI, Fig. S1).† Thus, the
overall cationic 3D nets exactly trap the p-hydroxybenzenesul-
fonate as charge-compensating guests in the nanochannels
(Fig. 5). PLATON20 calculation indicated that the resulting
effective free volume, after removal of encapsulated guests, was
35.0% of the crystal volume (1851.9 �A3 out of the 5285.0 �A3 unit
cell volume).
Fig. 5 View of the 3D framework encapsulating in situ organosulfonates
(shown in space-filling modes) as guests in the open channels along the
a-axis.
IR spectroscopy
In the spectrum of complex 1 (ESI, Fig. S2),† no characteristic
vibrations of nas(COO�) and ns(COO�) were found, which
demonstrates that the 5-sulfosalicylate was decarboxylated. The
peaks observed at 1602, 1558, 1531 and 1482 cm�1 can be assigned
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
to the vibrations of C–N and C–C of the benzene and pyridine
rings. The characteristic vibrations of nas(SO3�) are at 1216, 1166,
and 1124 cm�1, whereas the ns(SO3�) absorption is at 1031 cm�1.
The vibration of SO42� dianion may superpose with the nas(SO3
�)
at the very strong peak of 1124 cm�1. In addition, the IR spectrum
CrystEngComm, 2011, 13, 3895–3899 | 3897
Publ
ishe
d on
11
Apr
il 20
11. D
ownl
oade
d by
ME
DIC
AL
RE
SEA
RC
H C
OU
NC
IL L
AB
OR
AT
OR
Y O
F M
OL
EC
UL
AR
BIO
LO
GY
on
24/1
0/20
14 1
9:20
:07.
View Article Online
of complex 1 exhibits strong absorptions centered at 3419 cm�1,
occurring because of the existence of hydroxyl group of the in situ
generated p-hydroxybenzenesulfonate.
XPS spectra
In order to confirm the existence of an hydroxyl group and
copper only in the Cu(I) state, XPS spectra were recorded. As
shown in Fig. 6, no characteristic satellite peaks of Cu(II) are
detected. The binding energies of the Cu 2p3/2 level in the XPS
spectrum are 932.3 eV and 935.4 eV, which is also typical for
a Cu(I) oxidation state.21 The difference between the two Cu(I)
species is however too small to be assigned to different coordi-
nated Cu(I) ions.22 For the O1s core level, the spectrum could be
deconvoluted into three peaks: 530.8, 531.9, and 534.6 eV, which
correspond to the sulfate anion (SO42�), sulfonate group (–SO3
�)
and hydroxyl group (–OH), respectively (Fig. 7).23 These results
are consistent with the single-crystal X-ray and IR analyses.
Thermal analysis
To determine the thermostability of the nanoporous structure,
we investigated the thermal decomposition processes by TGA
experiments. The TG curve (ESI, Fig. S3)† of complex 1 shows
the weight loss of 6.21% (calcd 6.07%) from 150 to 250 �C
Fig. 6 XPS spectrum of 1 in the range corresponding to the Cu 2p level.
Fig. 7 XPS spectrum of 1 in the range corresponding to the O 1s level.
3898 | CrystEngComm, 2011, 13, 3895–3899
corresponds to the release of –SO3 groups. Then the following
continuous weight losses occur. Under the guidance of the TG
curve, we investigated PXRD experiments for the as-synthesized
sample of complex 1 and the samples heated at 100, 150 and
250 �C, respectively (ESI, Fig. S4).† The sample of complex 1
used was pure single-crystals. From the PXRD patterns for the
products at 100, 150 and 250 �C, the main peaks around the 2q of
8–10, 12, 19 and 25� are easily to be observed, which reveals that
the 3-fold interpenetration frameworks of complex 1 is nearly
intact before 250 �C.
Conclusions
In summary, we have successfully synthesized and characterized
the first in situ organosulfonate-templated 3-fold inter-
penetrating diamondoid framework, in which the tetrahedral
[Cu4(m4-SO4)] SBUs are reported for the fist time in 3D archi-
tectures. The present results demonstrate that the building block
[Cu4(m4-SO4)] and the bulkiness of the organic guests can effec-
tively influence the degree of interpenetration. This work
provides a method for constructing in situ organosulfonate-
templated interpenetrating metal–organic frameworks.
Acknowledgements
This work is financially supported by the Key Project of Natural
Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (no. ZD200903),
the Innovation team of Education bureau of Heilongjiang
Province (no. 2010td03) and Program for New Century Excellent
Talents in University (NCET-06-0349). We thank the University
of Heilongjiang (Hdtd2010-04) for supporting this study.
References
1 For example: N. W. Ockwig, O. Delgado-Friederichs, M. O’Keeffeeand O. M. Yaghi, Acc. Chem. Res., 2005, 38, 176–182; S. H. Cho,B. Ma, S. T. Nguyen, J. T. Hupp and T. E. Albrecht-Schmitt,Chem. Commun., 2006, 2563–2565; Y. Liu, G. Li, X. Li and Y. Cui,Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 6301–6304; D. Mircea andJ. R. Long, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 6766–6779; B. Chen,X. Zhao, A. Putkham, K. Hong, E. B. Lobkovsky, E. J. Hurtado,A. J. Fletcher and K. M. Thomas, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,6411–6423; M. D. Allendorf, R. J. T. Houk, L. Andruszkiewicz,A. A. Talin, J. Pikarsky, A. Choudhury, K. A. Gall andP. J. Hesketh, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 14404–14405;K. M. L. Taylor, A. Jin and W. Lin, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008,47, 7722–7725; W. J. Rieter, K. M. Pott, K. M. L. Taylor andW. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 11584–11585;K. M. L. Taylor, W. J. Rieter and W. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,2008, 130, 14358–14359; P. Horcajada, C. Serre, G. Maurin,N. A. Ramsahye, F. Balas, M. Vallet-Reg�ı, M. Sebban, T. Taulelleand G. F�erey, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 6774–6780; B. Chen,L. Wang, Y. Xiao, F. R. Fronczek, M. Xue, Y. Cui and G. Qian,Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 500–503.
2 S.R.BattenandR.Robson,Angew.Chem., Int.Ed., 1998,37, 1460–1494.3 L. R. MacGillivray, S. Subramanian and M. J. Zaworotko, J. Chem.Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, 1325–1326; S. R. Batten,CrystEngComm, 2001, 3, 67–72, and references therein.
4 H.-Y. Wang, S. Gao, L.-H. Huo, S. W. Ng and J.-G. Zhao, Cryst.Growth Des., 2008, 8, 665–670.
5 J. L. C. Rowsell and O. M. Yaghi, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44,4670–4679; B. Chen, S. Ma, F. Zapata, E. B. Lobkovsky and J. Yang,Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45, 5718–5720.
6 T. M. Reineke, M. Eddaoudi, D. M. Moler, M. O’Keeffe andO. M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 4843–4844.
7 J. Li, T. Furuta, H. Goto, T. Ohashi, Y. Fujiwara and S. J. Yip, J.Chem. Phys., 2003, 119, 2376–2385; B. Kesanli, Y. Cui,
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
Publ
ishe
d on
11
Apr
il 20
11. D
ownl
oade
d by
ME
DIC
AL
RE
SEA
RC
H C
OU
NC
IL L
AB
OR
AT
OR
Y O
F M
OL
EC
UL
AR
BIO
LO
GY
on
24/1
0/20
14 1
9:20
:07.
View Article Online
M. R. Smith, E. W. Bittner, B. C. Bockrath and W. Lin, Angew.Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 72–75.
8 X.-L. Wang, C. Qin, E.-B. Wang and Z.-M. Su, Chem. Commun.,2007, 4245–4247.
9 J. Zhang, R. Liu, P. Feng and X. Bu,Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46,8388–8391.
10 S.-R. Fan and L.-G. Zhu, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2009, 362, 2962–2976.
11 J.-F. Song, Y. Chen, Z.-G. Li, R.-S. Zhou, X.-Y. Xu, J.-Q. Xu andT. G. Wang, Polyhedron, 2007, 26, 4397–4410.
12 J. S. Dickstein, C. A. Mulrooney, E. M. O’Brien, B. J. Morgan andM. C. Kozlowski, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 2441–2444.
13 Cambridge Structure Database search, CSD Version 5.27 (November2005) with 16 updates (Jan 2006–Feb 2011).
14 Y. Xu, W. Bi, X. Li, D. Sun, R. Cao and M. Hong, Inorg. Chem.Commun., 2003, 6, 495–497; L. Carlucci, G. Ciani, D. M. Proserpioand S. Rizzato, CrystEngComm, 2003, 5, 190–199.
15 H.-P. Xiao, X.-H. Li, Q. Shi, W.-B. Zhang, J.-G. Wang andA. Morsali, J. Coord. Chem., 2008, 61, 2905–2915.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
16 G. Li, Y. Xing, S. Song, N. Xu, X. Liu and Z. Su, J. Solid State Chem.,2008, 181, 2406–2411.
17 O. M. Yaghi and H. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 10401–10402.
18 V. A. Blatov, L. Carlucci, G. Ciani and D. M. Proserpio,CrystEngComm, 2004, 6, 378–395.
19 V. A. Blatov, IUCr CompComm Newsletter, 2006, 7, 4–38, http://www.topos.ssu.samara.ru/.
20 A. L. Spek, PLATON, AMultipurpose Crystallographic Tool; UtrechtUniversity: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.
21 J. C. Klein, A. Proctor, D. M. Hercules and J. F. Black, Anal.Chem., 1983, 55, 2055–2059; C. Battistoni, G. Mattongno,E. Paparazzo and L. Naldini, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1985, 102,1–3.
22 A. N. Parvulescu, G. Marin, K. Suwinska, V. Ch. Kravtsov,M. Andruh, V. Parvulescud and V. I. Parvulescu, J. Mater. Chem.,2005, 15, 4234–4240.
23 Binding Energy of elements can be freely obtained from the websitehttp://www.lasurface.com/database/.
CrystEngComm, 2011, 13, 3895–3899 | 3899