the origins of music (oom) comparative evaluation of competing theories the origins of music (oom)...

34
The Origins of Music The Origins of Music (OoM) (OoM) Comparative evaluation of Comparative evaluation of competing theories competing theories Richard Parncutt Richard Parncutt University of Graz, University of Graz, Austria Austria International Conference on International Conference on Music Perception and Music Perception and SysMus Graz

Post on 19-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

  

The Origins of Music (OoM) The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of Comparative evaluation of

competing theoriescompeting theories

Richard ParncuttRichard ParncuttUniversity of Graz, AustriaUniversity of Graz, Austria

International Conference on Music International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC), Perception and Cognition (ICMPC),

Seattle USA, 23-27 August 2010Seattle USA, 23-27 August 2010SysMus Graz

Page 2: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Contents of talk Contents of talk

What is a “good” theory?What is a “good” theory? What is “music”? What is “music”? Pitfalls to avoidPitfalls to avoid Selected OoM- theoriesSelected OoM- theories Systematic evaluationsSystematic evaluations MothereseMotherese

Page 3: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

A “good” theory is...A “good” theory is...

simple simple parsimonious, falsifiable parsimonious, falsifiable

general general accounts for range of phenomena accounts for range of phenomena

concrete concrete clearly defined terms, processes clearly defined terms, processes

logical logical clear argument clear argument

empirical empirical observation-based, ecological observation-based, ecological

seminal seminal inspires new approaches inspires new approaches

Ockham Kuhn Popper GibsonOckham Kuhn Popper Gibson

Page 4: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

A good theory A good theory of a complex phenomenon...of a complex phenomenon...

focuses on striking, universal aspects (“focuses on striking, universal aspects (“the wood”the wood”)) neglects specific detail (“neglects specific detail (“the trees”the trees”) (δ ) (δ 0) 0)

focus on music’s focus on music’s mainmain……1.1. functionsfunctions

2.2. emotionsemotions

3.3. structuresstructuresBisham (2009): Bisham (2009): music’s “design features”music’s “design features”

(Is music a unitary phenomenon or a Western construct?)(Is music a unitary phenomenon or a Western construct?)

Page 5: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

1. Social functions of music1. Social functions of music

Music is an...Music is an...““interpersonal framework for synchronous and interpersonal framework for synchronous and group affective interaction” group affective interaction” (Bisham, 2009)(Bisham, 2009)

Participants...Participants...““share convergent intersubjective endstates”share convergent intersubjective endstates”

Music...Music...promotes conformity, integration, altruismpromotes conformity, integration, altruismenables coordinated action and change enables coordinated action and change

Page 6: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

2. Music and emotion 2. Music and emotion Juslin & Sloboda...Juslin & Sloboda...

pleasurepleasure underlies musical motivation underlies musical motivation (Schubert, 2009; Vusst & Kringelbach, 2009)(Schubert, 2009; Vusst & Kringelbach, 2009)

spiritualityspirituality (Gabrielsson & Lindström Wik, 2003)(Gabrielsson & Lindström Wik, 2003) ““dissociation from earthly reality”dissociation from earthly reality” (Schubert, 2009)(Schubert, 2009)

Music can evoke...Music can evoke... all emotions all emotions strong emotions strong emotions changed stateschanged states

“What is great about great music? It moves us emotionally! ...awe-filled... sublime... biologically rooted social-emotional feelings” (Panksepp, 2009)

Page 7: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

3. Music-structural universals3. Music-structural universals MelodyMelody: : like speech in...like speech in...

pitch range, interval sizes, tone and phrase durationspitch range, interval sizes, tone and phrase durations

RhythmRhythm: : tempo range like footsteps & heartbeats;tempo range like footsteps & heartbeats;

movement character (multimodality);movement character (multimodality);

beat induction, entrainment beat induction, entrainment (Honing, Patel, Merker)(Honing, Patel, Merker)

FormForm: : repetition, call-response, motivic developmentrepetition, call-response, motivic development

Page 8: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

A definition of musicA definition of music

an acoustic signalan acoustic signal evokes recognizable patternsevokes recognizable patterns implies physical movementimplies physical movement meaningfulmeaningful intentionalintentional accepted by a cultural group accepted by a cultural group not lexical (not “language”)not lexical (not “language”)

A good theory should explain all this!A good theory should explain all this!

Page 9: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Constructing OoM theories:Constructing OoM theories:Pitfalls to avoid Pitfalls to avoid

Arbitrary focusArbitrary focus WesternWestern evolutionaryevolutionary

Researcher’s backgroundResearcher’s background experienceexperience expertiseexpertise

Page 10: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Pitfall 1: Western classical focusPitfall 1: Western classical focus

Should we explain... Should we explain... major-minor tonality?major-minor tonality?““Great Composers”? Great Composers”?

Or rather...Or rather...hunter-gatherer rituals?hunter-gatherer rituals?shamanic ceremonies?shamanic ceremonies?garage bands?garage bands?iPod experiences?iPod experiences?

Page 11: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Pitfall 2: Evolutionary focusPitfall 2: Evolutionary focus Not necessarily evolutionary!Not necessarily evolutionary!

““there has been curious lack of attention to the there has been curious lack of attention to the possibility that musical origins can be explained possibility that musical origins can be explained without the need to invoke music-specific genes” without the need to invoke music-specific genes” (Livingstone & Thompson, 2009, p. 84)(Livingstone & Thompson, 2009, p. 84)

Function ≠ adaptationFunction ≠ adaptationgroup group functionfunction group group survivalsurvival??

““Just so stories” in evol.psychol.Just so stories” in evol.psychol.with little behavioral, genetic, neuro support with little behavioral, genetic, neuro support (Huron, Panksepp)(Huron, Panksepp)

Page 12: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Pitfall 3: Experience biasPitfall 3: Experience bias

Climate changeClimate change If I don’t experience it, it’s a lieIf I don’t experience it, it’s a lie

Personal experience of music Personal experience of music If I perform for sex, everyone doesIf I perform for sex, everyone does If I am gifted, giftedness existsIf I am gifted, giftedness exists

Page 13: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Pitfall 4: Expertise biasPitfall 4: Expertise bias

Emphasize aspects of problem that Emphasize aspects of problem that correspond to one’s own expertisecorrespond to one’s own expertise

e.g. I do psychoacoustics e.g. I do psychoacoustics auditory scene analysis auditory scene analysis

is centralis centralASA is pleasurableASA is pleasurableASA is origin of musicASA is origin of music

Page 14: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Musical origins or prerequisites?Musical origins or prerequisites?

PrerequisitesPrerequisites include: include: physiologyphysiology

vocal tract, fast neural processing...vocal tract, fast neural processing...(e.g. Fitsch, Nishimura, Lieberman)(e.g. Fitsch, Nishimura, Lieberman)

psychologypsychology reflective language, theory of mind...reflective language, theory of mind...

(e.g. Livingstone & Thompson, 2009)(e.g. Livingstone & Thompson, 2009)

latent abilitieslatent abilities ability to synchronize to a beatability to synchronize to a beat

(e.g. parrot “Snowball” – Patel)(e.g. parrot “Snowball” – Patel)

AnAn originorigin is is a a behavior similar to musicbehavior similar to music mechanisms, motivations, structuresmechanisms, motivations, structures

Page 15: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Six theories of originsSix theories of originsbehaviors that are similar to musicbehaviors that are similar to music

1.1. Animal behaviorsAnimal behaviors

2.2. Pleasure seekingPleasure seeking

3.3. Mate attractionMate attraction

4.4. Training Training

5.5. SocializingSocializing

6.6. MothereseMotherese

Page 16: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Grades for OoM theoriesGrades for OoM theories

Grade A B C D E

Evaluation brill good ok scrape sorry

Contribution to OoM

large medium small tiny zero

Systematic evaluation of performance on various tasks final grade

Weighting of tasks and final evaluation are subjective

Page 17: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

1. Non-human animal behaviors1. Non-human animal behaviors

Examples:Examples: singing (birds, whales, gibbons) singing (birds, whales, gibbons) territorial marking (wolves...)territorial marking (wolves...) synchronous chorusing (chimpanzees)synchronous chorusing (chimpanzees)

For: For: may explain unconscious “drives”may explain unconscious “drives”

Against: Against: isolated, impoverished skillsisolated, impoverished skills

Can account for music’s...Can account for music’s... functions: yes (but not intentionality)functions: yes (but not intentionality) emotions: yes (but not spirituality)emotions: yes (but not spirituality) structures: yes (but not their complexity) structures: yes (but not their complexity)

Grade: CGrade: C

Page 18: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

2. Non-adaptive pleasure seeking2. Non-adaptive pleasure seeking(Pinker, 1997; cf. Huron, 2001-2010)(Pinker, 1997; cf. Huron, 2001-2010)

Uses multiple existing neural systems: Uses multiple existing neural systems: motor, ASA, language, social, aggression...motor, ASA, language, social, aggression...

CounterevidenceCounterevidence based on accident – could go in the wrong directionbased on accident – could go in the wrong direction musicians do not get addicted and suffer withdrawalmusicians do not get addicted and suffer withdrawal

Accounts for music’s...Accounts for music’s... functions: nofunctions: no emotions: yesemotions: yes structures: nostructures: no

Grade: DGrade: D

Page 19: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

3. Mate attraction3. Mate attractionDarwin (1871), Miller (2000)Darwin (1871), Miller (2000)

Evidence: Evidence: more male than female musiciansmore male than female musicians more creative when sexually activemore creative when sexually active

Counterevidence: Counterevidence: no gender difference in music abilitiesno gender difference in music abilities humans are smarter than peacockshumans are smarter than peacocks

Accounts for music’s...Accounts for music’s... functions: yesfunctions: yes emotions: yesemotions: yes structures: no structures: no (peacock colors are arbitrary)(peacock colors are arbitrary) Grade: CGrade: C

Page 20: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

4. Training 4. Training (Roederer, 1984)(Roederer, 1984)

Children play with music Children play with music (in times of bounty and safety) (in times of bounty and safety)

to train survival skills to train survival skills (in times of shortage and danger)(in times of shortage and danger)performance, dance performance, dance physical skills, coordination physical skills, coordinationlistening listening cognitive skills, language cognitive skills, language

Doubts: Doubts: Does this kind of training really promote survival? Does this kind of training really promote survival? Is there a “Mozart effect”?Is there a “Mozart effect”?

Accounts for music’s...Accounts for music’s...functions: no (individual)functions: no (individual)emotions: only pleasureemotions: only pleasure

(not all, strong, spiritual)(not all, strong, spiritual) structures: maybe structures: maybe

Grade: CGrade: C

Page 21: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

5. Socializing5. SocializingRoederer (1984), McNeill (1995), Brown (2000)Roederer (1984), McNeill (1995), Brown (2000)Freeman (2000), Cross (2009), Huron (2001)....Freeman (2000), Cross (2009), Huron (2001)....

Evidence:Evidence:• Human rituals (church, soccer...) achieve “convergent Human rituals (church, soccer...) achieve “convergent

emotional states”, “socio-affective confluence” emotional states”, “socio-affective confluence” (Bisham)(Bisham)

• Primate grooming time Primate grooming time increases with increases with group size group size (Dunbar)(Dunbar)

Accounts for music’s...Accounts for music’s... functions: yesfunctions: yes emotionsemotions

yes: pleasureyes: pleasure

no: spirituality, strong emotionno: spirituality, strong emotion structures: maybestructures: maybe

Grade: BGrade: B

Page 22: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

6. Motherese6. MothereseDissanayake (2000), Falk (2004)Dissanayake (2000), Falk (2004)

Larger brain + bipedalism Larger brain + bipedalism earlier birth earlier birth infant fragility = “atriciality” infant fragility = “atriciality” (strong evolutionary argument)(strong evolutionary argument) more parental care more parental care survival survival new, complex infant-mother interactionnew, complex infant-mother interaction (difficult since partners are very different)(difficult since partners are very different)

Accounts for music’s...Accounts for music’s... functions: yesfunctions: yes emotions: yesemotions: yes structures: yesstructures: yes

Grade: AGrade: A

May also account for...May also account for...•reflective languagereflective language•theory of mindtheory of mind•all artsall arts

Page 23: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

From motherese to musicFrom motherese to music

* Long-term multimodal recognition memory for repeated, emotional patterns of sound and movement

** In play and ritual, behaviors similar to motherese • evoke “motherese feelings” • are reinforced by operant conditioning

Page 24: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

From motherese to musicFrom motherese to music

““It is not surprising that societies all over the world have It is not surprising that societies all over the world have developed these nodes of culture that we call ceremonies developed these nodes of culture that we call ceremonies and rituals, which do for their members what mothers and rituals, which do for their members what mothers naturally do for their babies: naturally do for their babies: engage their interest, involve engage their interest, involve them in a shared rhythmic pulse, and thereby instill feelings them in a shared rhythmic pulse, and thereby instill feelings of closeness and communion. of closeness and communion. The inborn propensities for The inborn propensities for imitation, reciprocity, and emotional communion in infancy imitation, reciprocity, and emotional communion in infancy have become further elaborated and used in ritualized and have become further elaborated and used in ritualized and ceremonial forms that themselves build and reinforce ceremonial forms that themselves build and reinforce feelings of unity among adults, feelings of unity among adults, all of which ultimately serve all of which ultimately serve to hold the group together.” to hold the group together.”

((Dissanayake, 2000, p. 64, cited by Davies)Dissanayake, 2000, p. 64, cited by Davies)

Page 25: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Infant musicalityInfant musicalitye.g. many studies by Trehub and collaboratorse.g. many studies by Trehub and collaborators

Sensitivity to...Sensitivity to... melodic contour; relative pitch/durationmelodic contour; relative pitch/duration specific musical intervals (e.g. fifths)specific musical intervals (e.g. fifths) changes in unequal scales/rhythmschanges in unequal scales/rhythms+ pulse + pulse (Winkler et al., 2009; Phillips-Silver & Trainor, 2005)(Winkler et al., 2009; Phillips-Silver & Trainor, 2005)

These are “predispositions”These are “predispositions”““evident in infancy, before they have evident in infancy, before they have obvious utilityobvious utility””(Trehub, 2001)(Trehub, 2001)

Page 26: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Utility of infant musicalityUtility of infant musicality(Parncutt, 2009, 2010)(Parncutt, 2009, 2010)

Adaptations: prenatal audition, motherese1 million years = 50,000 generations

Byproduct: music100,000 years = 5,000 generations

Page 27: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Origins of infant musicalityOrigins of infant musicalitytwo possibilitiestwo possibilities

Genetic Genetic (Trehub)(Trehub)

selection for music (mate attraction, selection for music (mate attraction, training, training, social glue, motherese…)social glue, motherese…)

Learned Learned (Parncutt)(Parncutt)

prenatal exposure to changing maternal prenatal exposure to changing maternal sound, movement and hormone levelssound, movement and hormone levels

Page 28: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Why is motherese not Why is motherese not accepted as an OoM?accepted as an OoM?

Motherese is not musicMotherese is not music no practice-based expertiseno practice-based expertise no audience (private, active)no audience (private, active)

Link to music is not...Link to music is not... evolutionary (out of fashion!)evolutionary (out of fashion!) documented (no data!)documented (no data!)

(but competing theories have similar problems!)(but competing theories have similar problems!)

Portrays women as musically activePortrays women as musically active Contradicts a pervasive cultural stereotypeContradicts a pervasive cultural stereotype

Page 29: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Is OoM research sexist?Is OoM research sexist?an academic question – not moral, ethnical or politicalan academic question – not moral, ethnical or political

Evidence:Evidence:

1. Popularity of mate attraction hypothesis 1. Popularity of mate attraction hypothesis (Darwin)(Darwin)

...although male & female music abilities do not differ!...although male & female music abilities do not differ!

2. Neglect of motherese hypothesis 2. Neglect of motherese hypothesis (Dissanayake) (Dissanayake)

...although no other theory satisfies all major criteria!...although no other theory satisfies all major criteria!

Page 30: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

In efficient hunter-gatherer societies, In efficient hunter-gatherer societies, men and women have different roles men and women have different roles in reproduction and survivalin reproduction and survival

sexism is “natural”sexism is “natural”we are all sexistwe are all sexist

Sexism and evolutionary theorySexism and evolutionary theory

Page 31: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Sexism and social psychologySexism and social psychologyBearman et al. (2009)Bearman et al. (2009)

Study of conversations: 45 pairs of female friendsStudy of conversations: 45 pairs of female friends

Analysis by categories of internalized sexism:Analysis by categories of internalized sexism:assertions of incompetence (powerlessness)assertions of incompetence (powerlessness)competition between womencompetition between womenconstruction of women as objectsconstruction of women as objectsinvalidation or derogation of womeninvalidation or derogation of women

Result: Result: On average, one such statement per minuteOn average, one such statement per minute

both men and women both men and women are sexistare sexist

Page 32: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

““Great music” was composed by white malesGreat music” was composed by white males

Philosophical explanation (Kant): Philosophical explanation (Kant):

The female mind comprehends...The female mind comprehends... beautybeauty: : small, curved, soft, gentle, delicatesmall, curved, soft, gentle, delicate but not sublimitybut not sublimity: : rough, jagged, fearsomerough, jagged, fearsome

Culturally transmitted stereotypes:Culturally transmitted stereotypes: (some) men are musically active and deep(some) men are musically active and deep women are musically passive and superficialwomen are musically passive and superficial

Sexism and music historySexism and music history

Page 33: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Covert or subtle sexismCovert or subtle sexism

““hidden or clandestine...unnoticed because it is hidden or clandestine...unnoticed because it is built into cultural and societal norms” built into cultural and societal norms”

(Swim & Cohen, 2006) (Swim & Cohen, 2006)

MicroaggressionMicroaggression““unconscious and unintentional expression of bias unconscious and unintentional expression of bias and prejudice toward socially devalued groups” and prejudice toward socially devalued groups”

(Sue, 2010)(Sue, 2010)

Page 34: The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories The Origins of Music (OoM) Comparative evaluation of competing theories Richard

Conclusion: take this theory seriously! Conclusion: take this theory seriously!

Motherese as the origin of musicMotherese as the origin of musicDissanayake (2000), Falk (2004)Dissanayake (2000), Falk (2004)

Larger brain + bipedalism Larger brain + bipedalism earlier birth earlier birth infant fragility “atriciality”infant fragility “atriciality” more parental care more parental care survival survival new, complex infant-mother interactionnew, complex infant-mother interaction

Accounts for music’s...Accounts for music’s... functions: yesfunctions: yes emotions: yesemotions: yes structures: yesstructures: yes

Maybe also for...Maybe also for...reflective languagereflective languagetheory of mindtheory of mindall artsall arts