thymosin β4 and tissue transglutaminase. molecular characterization of cyclic thymosin β4
TRANSCRIPT
Thymosin b4 and Tissue Transglutaminase. MolecularCharacterization of Cyclic Thymosin b4
Christine App • Jana Knop • Thomas Huff •
Heinrich Sticht • Ewald Hannappel
Published online: 23 August 2013
� Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013
Abstract Thymosin b4 is the prototype of b-thymosins
and is present in almost every mammalian cell. It is
regarded to be the main intracellular G-actin sequestering
peptide. Thymosin b4 serves as a specific glutaminyl sub-
strate for guinea pig transglutaminase. In the absence of an
appropriate additional aminyl donor an e-amino group of
thymosin b4 serves also as an aminyl substrate and an
intramolecular bond is formed concomitantly NH3 (17 Da)
is lost. The molecular mass of the product is 4,949.6 Da.
This is 16.3 Da less than the molecular mass of thymosin
b4 (4,965.9 Da). Digestion with endopeptidases and Edman
degradation of the fragments identified the exact position
of the ring forming isopeptide bond. In spite of 3 glutam-
inyl and 9 lysyl residues of thymosin b4 only one isopep-
tide bond between Lys16 and Gln36 was formed (cyclic
thymosin b4). These two amino acid residues are conserved
in all b-thymosins. Cyclic thymosin b4 still forms a com-
plex with G-actin albeit the stability of the complex is
about one fiftieth of the stability of the thymosin b4 9 G-
actin complex.
Keywords Cyclic thymosin b4 � Isopeptide bond �Thymosin b4 � Transglutaminase
Abbreviations
WH2 WASP-homology 2
EDC 1-ethyl-3-(3-
dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide
RP-HPLC Reversed phase-high pressure liquid
chromatographie
MALDI-TOF–MS Matrix-assisted laser ionization-time
of flight-mass spectrometry
1 Introduction
The family of the b-thymosins is highly conserved and
b-thymosins are present in many tissues of vertebrates [25].
Originally b-thymosins were defined by their isoelectric
points between 5 and 7 [28]. b-thymosins are a ubiquitous
family of more than 15 related molecules with highly con-
served amino acid sequences [22]. Thymosin b4 is the most
abundant member of the family. It can be detected in cells of
many vertebrates except of erythrocytes [10, 15, 16]. It was
shown that thymosin b4 is involved in many intra- and
extracellular processes. Extracellular thymosin b4 promotes
angiogenesis [9, 31, 43] and acts anti-apoptotic [49] and anti-
microbiotic [19]. Thymosin b4 stimulates directional migra-
tion of cells in vitro and in vivo [2, 30, 31, 43, 51]. Application
of thymosin b4 shortly after a myocardial infarction in animals
improves cardiac function and reduces the infarct size [2, 18,
42, 45]. Several studies on the injured eye or with cell lines
generated from eye tissue have shown that thymosin b4 pro-
motes wound healing and eases inflammatory response [46–
48, 50]. In 1991 it was determined that the G-actin seques-
tering protein Fx and thymosin b4 are identical [39]. Thy-
mosin b4 is the main intracellular G-actin sequestering peptide
[39, 40]. To prevent polymerization of G-actin to F-actin
thymosin b4 forms a 1:1 complex with G-actin [39]. Kd-values
for the ATP-G-actin: thymosin b4-complex have been deter-
mined by equilibrium centrifugation assays or ultrafiltration
between 0.5 and 2.5 lM [21, 25, 38, 41, 56].
C. App (&) � J. Knop � T. Huff � H. Sticht � E. Hannappel
Institute of Biochemistry, Emil-Fischer-Zentrum, Friedrich-
Alexander-University, Fahrstr.17, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Protein J (2013) 32:484–492
DOI 10.1007/s10930-013-9507-0
Transglutaminases catalyze a calcium-dependent acyl
transfer reaction between the c-carboxamide group of a
peptide-bound glutamine residue and the primary amino
group of either a peptide bound lysine or polyamine [13].
The resulting bond is covalent, stable and resistant to
proteolysis. Transglutaminases have a broad specificity for
primary amine substrates, whereas the number of proteins
which serve as glutaminyl substrates is highly restricted. It
has been shown that thymosin b4 can serve as a specific
glutaminyl substrate of guinea pig transglutaminase in vitro
[20]. Factor XIIIa -a plasma transglutaminase- incorporates
thymosin b4 in fibrin and fibrinogen attached to a plastic
surface [24, 32], important factors in blood coagulation.
Transglutaminase can be used to attach cadaverine, for
instance Oregon green cadaverine [20] to thymosin b4. It
was shown that this derivatization does not influence the
biological activity of thymosin b4 [20].
In the last years the central actin-binding motif of thy-
mosin b4 was found to be repeated in other proteins such as
actobindin [4, 17, 55], ciboulot [3] and tetraThymosinb[54]. This binding motif was detected in a growing number
of proteins generally involved in actin-based motility act-
ing as a G-actin-binding element. Because of its occurrence
in WASP-proteins this motif was called the WH2 (WASP-
homology 2) domain [37]. Proteins with several WH2
domains are acting differently compared to thymosin b4
which has only one WH2 domain. TetraThymosinb for
instance is able to sequester multiple actin monomers
instead of the 1:1 complex formed by thymosin b4 [54].
Interestingly, the function of proteins with several WH2
domains like ciboulot [3] and tetraThymosinb [54] has
switched from a G-actin sequestering as of thymosin b4 to
F-actin promoting assembly similar to profilin.
In this work we analyzed if it is possible to generate
dimers or multimers of thymosin b4 by transglutaminase-
reaction to imitate a polypeptide with several WH2
domains. However, we found that thymosin b4 is rather
forming a cyclic form instead of polymers. This peptide is
still able to sequester G-actin with low affinity.
2 Experimental Procedures
2.1 Proteins and Reagents
Reagents were obtained from the following sources: thymosin
b4 was isolated from bovine spleen as described [25]; Li-
Chroprep RP-18 (40–63 lm), acetonitrile and trifluoroacetic
acid (TFA, Uvasol) from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany);
Guinea pig liver transglutaminase and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimeth-
ylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) from Sigma; AsnC
endopeptidase was purchased by TaKaRa Biochemicals;
AspN endopeptidase from Roche; Fluorescamine from
Serva.
2.2 Thymosin b4 and Transglutaminase
500 lg thymosin b4 were dissolved in 20 ll bidistilled
water. 210 ll reaction buffer (0.2 M Tris; 10 mM CaCl2;
1 M EDTA; 1 mM DTT; pH 6) were added to this solution.
To start the reaction 0.1 U guinea pig liver transgluta-
minase was added. The transglutaminase was dried in
vacuo for storage. The final concentration of thymosin b4
in the reaction was 0.4 mM. Aliquots were taken to mon-
itor the time course of the reaction. The reaction was
stopped by the addition of 5 ll 10 % trifluoroacetic acid to
denaturate the enzyme.
2.3 RP-HPLC
The separation system used is based on a conventional
HPLC gradient system (D-6000; Merck/Hitatchi). The
solvents contained 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid in water or in
40 % acetonitrile. The separation of the peptides or their
generated fragments was performed by a reverse-phase
column (Beckman ODS Ultrasphere column (5 lm,
4.6 mm 9 250 mm)). The detection of these peptides was
done by fluram post-column derivatization [23]. FluramTM
(fluorescamine) reacts at alkaline pH with primary amines
and forms highly fluorescent derivatives. It’s necessary for
this post column derivatization process to raise the pH
within the system. For that reason borate buffer has to be
added to the eluate after separation. This addition raises the
pH value for optimal reaction conditions of the peptide or
its fragments with the added flurescamine. The addition of
borate and flurescamine to the separated peptides or frag-
ments is controlled by a derivatization pump (655A-13;
Merck/Hitatchi). This pump has three channels to deliver
borate (0.3 M, pH 9.3; on two channels) and flurescamine
(0.02 % in acetone; on the remaining channel) to the probe.
After this addition the mix passes through an reaction coil
to give about 12 s reaction time. Afterwards the formed
fluorescent derivatives were detected by a fluorometer
(fluorescent detector L2485; Merck/Hitatchi). The fluo-
rometer signal was recorded on a computer using D-7000
HSM software (Merck). The flow rate was 0.75 ml/min.
The gradient was linear from 0 to 40 % acetonitrile in
30 min.
For preparative HPLC peptides were detected at 205 nm
(UV-detector L4000; Merck/Hitatchi). Detection via post-
column derivatization is not suitable because the reaction is
irreversible. Fractions were collected every minute using a
fraction collector. The gradient was linear from 0 to 100 %
acetonitrile in 120 min.
Thymosin b4 and Tissue Transglutaminase 485
123
2.4 MALDI-TOF
Prior to analysis by MALDI-TOF–MS the samples were
concentrated in vacuo. The MALDI-TOF MS was carried
out as described [20]. The instrument used was a BiflexTM
III MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics).
The technical equipment of the apparatus are a nitrogen
laser (k = 337 nm) and a reflectron. The analysis of laser-
desorbed positive ions takes place after acceleration by
19 kV in the reflection mode. A standard peptide mixture
was used for external calibration. On an average 30 indi-
vidual spectra formed a mass spectrum.
To obtain a final sample concentration of about 20 ng/ll
dried peptide samples were dissolved in suitable amounts
of 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid containing 33 % acetonitrile.
1 ll of each sample was mixed with 2 ll of a saturated
solution of a-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (Sigma) in
0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid in 33 % acetonitrile. Then again
1 ll of this mixture was spotted onto a stainless steel
target.
2.5 Digestion with Various Enzymes
Thymosin b4 (50 lg) or cyclic thymosin b4 (42 lg) in
50 ll 0.2 M pyridine buffer was digested with 0.1 lg
AspN endoproteinase at room temperature. Monitoring of
the reaction was done by reversed phase HPLC analyses.
To stop the reaction 5 ll 10 % trifluoracetic acid were
added and products were separated by preparative HPLC.
50 lg thymosin b4 or 42 lg cyclic thymosin b4 were
incubated with 20 lU AsnC-endoproteinase in 100 ll
reaction buffer (50 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.0, 0.2 mM
DTT, 0.2 mM EDTA) for 16 h at room temperature. The
reaction was stopped by adding 5 ll 10 % TFA and
products were separated by preparative HPLC.
2.6 Edman Degradation
Lyophilised probes were diluted in 60 ll (40 % mercap-
toethanol and 1 % formic acid in water). 15 ll of each
probe from digest fractionations were applied to the
pulsed-liquid sequencer Procise model 494 (applied
biosystems).
2.7 Amino Acid Analysis
The method was caried out as described [14]. Peptides
(200–500 pmol) were hydrolyzed in 6 M HCl at 155 �C for
45–60 min. After hydrolysis the samples were lyophilized
and diluted in 10 ll 1 M sodium borate buffer, pH 9.3.
Afterwards the amino acids were determined by HPLC with
a LiChrospher RP-18e column. In this case a precolumn
derivatization with o-phthalaldehyde/3-mercaptopropionic
acid was applied according to Graser [12]. The precolumn
derivatization was started by addition of 5 ll of o-phthal-
dialdehyde/3-mercaptopropionic acid (10 mg o-phthalal-
dehyde in 1 ml methanol and 10 ll 3-mercaptopropionic
acid). After a derivatization time of 2.5 min, the reaction
was terminated by addition of 100 ll of solvent A. To
ensure the same sample amount in every analysis the
sample was injected via a 20 ll loop into the HPLC system.
The flow rate was 1.5 ml/min. The gradient was linear from
solvent A (12.5 mM Na2HPO4, 12.5 mM NaH2PO4, 2 %
tetrahydrofuran, 3 % acetonitrile) to 100 % solvent B
(30 % acetonitrile in 8.75 mM Na2HPO4, 8.75 mM
NaH2PO4) in 12 min.
2.8 Determination of the Kd-Value
Actin was prepared from bovine heart by the method of
Pardee and Spudich [36]. G-actin was stored in G-buffer at
0 �C. The concentration of actin was determined by amino
acid analysis after acid hydrolysis (6 M HCl, 155 �C, 1 h)
and precolumn derivatization with o-phthaldialdehyde/
3-mercaptopropionic acid [14]. Equilibrium centrifugation
assays and calculation of Kd-values were determined as
described [25]. Thymosin b4 or cyclic thymosin b4 were
diluted to a concentration of about 66 lM and supplemented
with a defined amount of the internal standard Phe-Ala.
175 ll of this solution were mixed with 75 ll of a dextran
solution (50 mg/ml) and either 500 ll G-buffer or G-actin-
buffer solution. The reference proteins lactalbumin, tryp-
sinogen, ovalbumine and bovine serum albumine were
dissolved at 10 mg / ml in 109 G-buffer without mercap-
toethanol. 20 ll of this solution were mixed with 160 ll
H2O and 20 ll Dextran solution for centrifugation. One-
third of the 12 centrifuge tubes were loaded with 150 ll of
the peptide/buffer solutions. The next 4 tubes were filled
with 150 ll of the peptide/actin solutions. The remaining 4
tubes were used for the molecular mass standard proteins
(150 ll solution each). All tubes were incubated for 15 min
at room temperature. For equilibrium centrifugation a
Beckman 70.1Ti rotor with home-made adaptors for 175 ll
polyallomer tubes (size 5 mm 9 20 mm, Beckman) in a
Beckman L70 ultracentrifuge was used. A run was per-
formed at 35000g and 4 �C. After 16 h the top 50 ll of the
tubes were removed and peptide, fragments or protein
content was determined. For determination the removed
50 ll were mixed with 5 ll 4 M perchloric acid and incu-
bated for 30 min at 4 �C: After centrifugation (20,000g for
5 min) the supernatant solution was carefully removed and
the precipitate was used for protein determination. The pH
of the supernatant solution was adjusted to 3–5 with 10 M
KOH. The precipitated KClO4 was removed after a 15 min
incubation on ice. An aliquot of this solution was analyzed
using RP-HPLC.
486 C. App et al.
123
2.9 Protein Determination
To determine the protein concentrations a modified 2,20-bicinchoninic acid assay was used [44]. The precipitated
protein was dissolved at a concentration in the range of
20-60 ng/ll in a dilution buffer (2 % Na2CO3�H2O,
0.16 % disodium tartrate, 0.4 % NaOH, 0.25 % NaHCO3
adjusted to pH 11.25 with NaOH). Samples with the
reference proteins were only diluted and not precipitated.
50 ll of the solubilized protein were added to 400 ll of
bicinchoninic acid reagent. The samples were incubated
for 30 min at 60 �C. Afterwards the probes were mea-
sured at 562 nm. All samples were done at least in
duplicate.
2.10 Cross-Linking with EDC
To perform cross-linking with EDC, a solution of 36 g/l in
H2O was prepared. 5 ll of this solution were added to
50 ll G-buffer (2 mM HEPES; 0.2 mM ATP; 0.2 mM
CaCl2; pH 8.0) containing 15 lM actin and 15 lM thy-
mosin b4 or cyclic thymosin b4. After 90 min incubation
another 5 ll of the EDC solution were added.
2.11 Falling Ball Viscosimetry
This method was used to determine the sequestering
activities of the peptides [6]. G-actin (1.4 lM) was prein-
cubated for 15 min with an equimolar amount of thymosin
b4 or cyclic thymosin b4 or a tenfold molar excess of cyclic
thymosin b4 in G-buffer at room temperature. To start the
polymerization MgCl2 (final concentration 4 mM) was
added to the solution. 50 ll of the solution were transferred
into a glass capillary (Ø 0.92 mm) and incubated for 4 h at
room temperature. As a measure for the viscosity served
the time a steel ball (Ø 0.794 mm) needed to cross 45 mm
of the filled capillary at an angle of 60�.
2.12 Modelling of Cyclic Thymosin b4
The conformation of the C-terminal half of thymosin b4
was retrieved from a complex crystal structure of G-actin
with a hybrid protein comprising gelsolin domain 1 and
residues 22–40 of thymosin b4 (PDB cide 1T44;[26]). After
truncation of the gelsolin moiety, the N-terminal residues
2–21 of thymosin b4 were added, and a helical conforma-
tion was modeled for residues 4–16 according to the NMR
spectroscopic data from Zabock et al. [58]. After genera-
tion of an isopeptide bond between the Lys16 and Gln36
sidechains, the structure was energy minimized showing
that this bond can be formed without any steric problems.
Modeling and energy minimization were performed using
Sybyl (Tripos Inc.).
3 Results
3.1 Generation of Cyclic Thymosin b4
It is known that thymosin b4 can serve as an aminyl sub-
strate [41] as well as a glutaminyl substrate [20] in reac-
tions catalyzed by transglutaminase. In the reaction
described here thymosin b4 lacks another substrate to react
with. 500 lg thymosin b4 were lyophilized and diluted in
reaction buffer. The reaction was started by the addition of
0.1 U transglutaminase and monitored by reverse phase
HPLC (Fig. 1). RP-HPLC data shows a decrease of thy-
mosin b4 and the simultaneous formation of a product at a
higher retention time. By adding 10 % trifluoric acid the
reaction was stopped. The formed product was isolated by
RP-HPLC using the preparative conditions described
above. The molecular mass of the isolated product was
determined by MALDI-TOF-MS (4,949.6 Da). It was
16.3 Da less than the molecular mass of thymosin b4
(4,965.9 Da) (Fig. 2). This corresponds to the loss of
ammonia and points to the formation of a cyclic form of
thymosin b4. No poly-thymosin b4 were detected in mass
spectrometry. Surprisingly, it was not possible to generate
a poly-thymosin b4 using tissue transglutaminase.
3.2 Molecular Characterization of Cyclic Thymosin b4
To elucidate if the newly formed product is a cyclic form
of thymosin b4 digestions of the isolated product with
various enzymes were performed. The endopeptidase AsnC
cleaves proteins C-terminal of asparagine. Thymosin b4
contains only one asparagine residue, thus thymosin b4
contains only one cleavage site, directly after Asn26. Two
fragments were generated by a cleavage of thymosin b4
with AsnC (3,109.7 and 1,871.7 Da; Fig. 3a). Whereas
Fig. 1 RP-HPLC analysis of the reaction of thymosin b4 catalyzed by
transglutaminase. 1 ll was taken from the reaction mix after
incubation for 0 and 3 h
Thymosin b4 and Tissue Transglutaminase 487
123
cleavage of the reaction product only generated one frag-
ment (4,964.6 Da) indicating that the two fragments were
still connected.
The other endopeptidase used was AspN. This enzyme
specifically cleaves N-terminally of aspartatic acid and
occasionally of glutamic acid. This digestion of thymosin
b4 is expected to generate three major fragments. The first
fragment runs from the N-terminus to Pro4. The second
fragment starts at Asp5 and ends at Phe12. These two
fragments are lost in the analysis because of their small
sizes. The third fragment starts at Asp13 and contains the
rest of the peptide. Within this fragment there is a Glu at
position 23 which can serve as an additional unusual
cleavage site. Cleavage of thymosin b4 with AspN pro-
duced one main product shown in Fig. 3 (3,531.4 Da). This
fragment runs from position 13 to 43. But in the case of the
cleavage of the reaction product two fragments with
identical amino acid composition were detected (data not
shown). The molecular mass of the two fragments (3,514.2
and 3,532.1 Da) generated from the reaction product dif-
fered by 18.1 Da indicating the cleavage of the peptide
bond between Gln23 and Glu24. After isolation of these
fragments of the reaction product Edman sequencing was
performed. It revealed undetectable amino acid residues at
the positions 16 and 36 (Fig. 3b). This indicates the for-
mation of an isopeptide bond between Lys16 and Gln36 of
thymosin b4. This confirms the observation that the intra-
molecular ring forming reaction is energetic more favor-
able than the intermolecular reaction leading to multimers
of thymosin b4.
It is known that thymosin b4 can serve as a substrate for
reactions catalyzed by factor XIIIa [24, 29], which plays an
important role in blood coagulation. We tried unsuccess-
fully to verify the existence of the cyclic peptide in vivo.
3.3 Interaction of Cyclic Thymosin b4 with G-Actin
After the identification of the isopeptide bond forming
residues it was tested if the cyclic peptide is still able to
sequester G-actin. The cyclic form of thymosin b4 was
Fig. 2 Mass spectrum of thymosin b4 and cyclic thymosin b4
determined by MALDI-TOF analysis. For the interaction experiments
the cyclic thymosin b4 was separated from thymosin b4 by RP-HPLC
and the purity of the eluate was verified by mass spectrometry
Fig. 3 a AsnC does specifically hydrolyze peptide bonds on the
carboxyl side of asparagine residues. Cleavage of thymosin b4 leads
to two fragments while in the cyclic form the two fragments are still
connected by an isopeptide bond. b AspN does perferentially
hydrolyze peptide bonds on the aminyl side of aspartate and
glutamate (rare). The amino acid sequence was determined by Edman
degradation and is depicted above the corresponding fragment.
Amino acid residues connected to another amino acid residue via an
isopeptide bond are missing in Edman sequencing and are shown as –
488 C. App et al.
123
isolated by RP-HPLC and the purity of the peptide was
determined by MALDI-TOF analysis before the following
experiments. First we studied the polymerization-inhibiting
capacity of the cyclic form of thymosin b4 (Table 1). For
polymerized actin the time of fall was 89.8 ± 8 s
(mean ± standard deviation, n = 5). The value decreased
to 10 ± 0.8 s (n = 6) in the presence of an equimolar
amount of thymosin b4. This equaled the value of the
buffer solution and corresponds to complete inhibition of
polymerization. For equal amounts of cyclic thymosin b4
and G-actin the values observed were 56.2 ± 5 s (n = 6).
The measurement at a two fold molar excess of cyclic
thymosin b4 over G-actin showed no significant difference
(56.6 ± 6.4 s, n = 3). Cyclic thymosin b4 can inhibit the
polymerization of actin but only at a tenfold molar excess
over G-actin (7.2 ± 0.8 s, n = 3).
For further analysis of this interaction we cross-linked
the samples with the zero-length cross-linker EDC. After
cross-linking we determined the cross-linking with a SDS-
PAGE-analysis using Pharmacia PhastGel Gradient 10–15.
The gel was stained Coomassie blue (Fig. 4). The staining
indicated that cyclic thymosin b4 can be cross-linked to
actin but with a very low efficiency. In western blot anal-
ysis we could show that the cyclic form of thymosin b4 is
still recognized by an antibody against thymosin b4 (data
not shown).
Determination of the Kd-value by equilibrium centri-
fugation showed a lower affinity to G-actin in the case of
the cyclic peptide (50.7 lM) in comparison to thymosin
b4 (0.7 lM). The obtained results are depicted in
Table 2.
4 Discussion
In this study we demonstrated that thymosin b4 when
incubated with transglutaminase forms an intramolecular
isopeptide bond. Using MALDI-TOF, amino acid analysis,
proteolytic fragmentation and Edman digestion we identi-
fied that Lys16 and Gln36 of thymosin b4 are involved in
the formation of the isopeptide bond. This cyclic variant of
thymosin b4 is still able to form a complex with G-actin.
This complex formation was shown in three independent
experiments. The cyclic form inhibits the salt-induced
polymerization of G-actin though it needed a tenfold molar
excess over G-actin to do so. The stability of the complex
of cyclic thymosin b4 formed with G-actin is only a fiftieth
of the stability of the complex formed with linear thymosin
b4. It was possible to cross-link cyclic thymosin b4 to
G-actin at a tenfold molar excess. The cross-linking reac-
tion with EDC has very stringent requirements [1] so it is a
reasonable method to proof the interaction between two
proteins.
It has been shown that extracellular thymosin b4 is
involved in angiogenesis [9, 31, 43], apoptosis [49], wound
healing [46–48, 50] and blood coagulation [16, 40, 59]. In
these processes, transglutaminases play important roles.
We demonstrated here that it is possible for transgluta-
minase to form a cyclic form of thymosin b4 in the absence
of other reaction partners. Unfortunately, we failed to
detect cyclic thymosin b4 in vivo. Therefore, we analyzed
saliva, wound fluid and a protein extract derived out of rat
liver using RP-HPLC and mass spectrometry experiments
with a high resolution. Thus the missing cyclic thymosin b4
in vivo might just be due to our experimental set up or to
other competing reactants for the transglutaminase reaction
in investigated cells. However, it is very challenging to
distinguish between thymosin b4 and its cyclic form using
Table 1 Falling-ball viscosimetry of G-actin with or without thymosin b4 or cyclic thymosin b4 (±SD, n = number of experiments)
G-buffer G-actin G-actin ?
thymosin b4
G-actin ? cyclic
thymosin b4
G-actin ? cyclic
thymosin b4
G-actin ? cyclic
thymosin b4
Molar ratio (G-actin: thymosins) 1:1 1:1 1:2 1:20
Time of fall [sec] 8 89.8 ± 8 n = 5 10 ± 0.8 n = 6 56.2 ± 5 n = 6 56.6 ± 6.4 n = 3 7.2 ± 0.8 n = 3
Fig. 4 Cross-linking of thymosin b4 and cyclic thymosin b4 to
G-actin by 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide. a puri-
fied G-actin without EDC, b equimolar concentrations of G-actin and
thymosin b4, c equimolar concentrations of G-actin and cyclic
thymosin b4, d tenfold molar excess of cyclic thymosin b4 over
G-actin. The protein mixture in the lanes b, c and d was cross-linked
by addition of EDC. Detection of the cross-link was performed by
coomassie staining
Table 2 Determination of the dissociation constant of the complex of
G-actin and thymosin b4 or cyclic thymosin b4 by equilibrium cen-
trifugation [25]
Complex of G-actin with Kd (lM)
Thymosin b4 0.7
Cyclic thymosin b4 50.7
Thymosin b4 and Tissue Transglutaminase 489
123
standard procedures because of the identical amino acid
sequence. Antibodies for instance recognize both variants
of the peptide. However, it has been shown recently that a
cyclic form of statherin, a 43 amino acids containing
peptide, can be found in saliva [5]. It was shown that about
1 % of this peptide can be found cyclized by transgluta-
minase 2. So maybe the total amount of cyclic thymosin b4
is just to low to be detected besides its native linear form.
Tissue transglutaminases are multifunctional enzymes
with various roles in cellular processes [53]. It has been
shown that transglutaminase 2 plays a key role in the
apoptotic death of cancer cells [57]. High activity of a
transglutaminase could possibly lead to a cyclation of
thymosin b4. This could be a mechanism to inhibit its
described anti-apoptotic effect [49]. Many neurodegener-
ative diseases in humans such as Alzheimer’s disease are
caused by the formation of protein aggregates. The avail-
able data show that transglutaminases are involved in
theses pathogenetic mechanisms [34]. It could be possible
to detect cyclic thymosin b4 as a side product of these
processes. The shown neuroprotective effect of thymosin
b4 [35] could be weakened by its cyclation.
In 1990 Safer et al. [40] proposed that the sequence17LKKTETQEK25 of thymosin b4 may be responsible for
actin sequestering, because of the high homology with the
known actin-binding sequence of actobindin [55]. In a
previous study we have demonstrated that truncation of up
to 13 N-terminal amino acid residues does not abolish
chemical cross-linking to G-actin. In contrast truncation of
the first 23 amino acid residues destroys EDC cross-linking
[25]. This supports the proposal by Safer and colleages.
Unexpectedly derivatization of Gln23 does not abolish
G-actin binding [20, 59]. This indicates that this amino acid
residue is not essential for actin sequestering. Indeed this
residue is not conserved in actobindin [55]. A model based
on the structural data of thymosin b4 [26, 58] showed that it
is sterically possible to form an isopeptide bond between
Lys16 and Gln36 of thymosin b4 (Fig. 5). In aqueous
solution thymosin b4 is rather unstructured [7]. NMR
studies have shown that thymosin b4 folds completely upon
binding to G-actin and displays a central extended region
flanked by an N- and C-terminal helix [8]. This versatility
of thymosin b4 to adopt different conformations might
allow promiscuous protein interactions and explain its
multiple functions [33]. The cyclic form of thymosin b4 has
lost this characteristic structural flexibility. By the forma-
tion of an intramolecular isopeptide bond the flexibility of
thymosin b4 is partially lost, in spite of this loss in flexi-
bility cylclic thymosin b4 is still able to interact with
G-actin. This loss might explain the destabilization of the
complex of cyclic thymosin b4 and G-actin. Thymosin b4
interacts with G-actin at three different points along the
subdomains 1–3 of actin [27] in an extended conformation
[41]. In cyclic thymosin b4 Lys16 is cross-linked to Gln36
(Fig. 5). This alters the conformation of the peptide and
results in a loss of flexibilty. For this reason it is not clear
how the cyclic form of thymosin b4 interacts with G-actin.
There are further investigations needed to have enough
data to propose a model of the interaction of G-actin and
the cyclized form of thymosin b4.
The glutaminyl substrate specificity has been studied by
the group of Gorman and Folk [11]. They have shown that
a Gln which is followed by an Lys at the position ?2 is
more likely to serve as glutaminyl substrate. Gln23 and
Gln36 of thymosin b4 are followed by such a Lys at
position ?2. Gln36 might be the only detected reacted
residue because of its spatial distance to Lys16. Trans-
glutaminases are not so selective in aminyl substrates [28,
59] but it might be that these two residues are in a
appropriate distance to bind in the reactive center of the
enzyme. The group of Touati et al. [52] has studied the
ability of a bacterial transglutaminase to form cyclic pep-
tides in vitro. It was shown with different artificial peptides
that the ring forming is depending on the amino acid
sequence and the length of the peptide. In all reactions the
cyclation was never complete (just 50 % of the peptide was
cyclized). This supports our observation that not all thy-
mosin b4 is cyclized in vitro when there are no other
reactants present. This poor efficency might also be a
reason for undectable cyclic thymosin b4 in vivo.
A reaction of thymosin b4 catalyzed by tissue trans-
glutaminase does not lead to an artifical WH2 domain
protein. Instead it leads to the formation of an
Fig. 5 Model of thymosin b4 and cyclic thymosin b4. Thymosin b4 in
green, cyclic thymosin b4 in purple; isopeptide bond forming residues
are labeled
490 C. App et al.
123
intramolecular bond involving Lys16 and Gln36. This
peptide is still able to sequester G-actin albeit the stability
of the complex is about one fiftieth of the stability of the
thymosin b4 9 G-actin complex.
Acknowledgments We would like to express our appreciation to
Doris Jaegers for excellent technical assistance and support. EH and
TH thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for support.
Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. App C, Knop J, Mannherz HG, Hannappel E (2012) Ann N Y
Acad Sci 1270:98–104. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06658.x
2. Bock-Marquette I, Saxena A, White MD, Dimaio JM, Srivastava
D (2004) Nature 432(7016):466–472. doi:10.1038/nature03000
3. Boquet I, Boujemaa R, Carlier MF, Preat T (2000) Cell
102(6):797–808
4. Bubb MR, Lewis MS, Korn ED (1991) J Biol Chem
266(6):3820–3826
5. Cabras T, Inzitari R, Fanali C, Scarano E, Patamia M, Sanna MT,
Pisano E, Giardina B, Castagnola M, Messana I (2006) J Sep Sci
29(17):2600–2608
6. Cooper JA, Pollard TD (1982). Methods Enzymol 85 Pt
B:182–210
7. Czisch M, Schleicher M, Horger S, Voelter W, Holak TA (1993)
Eur J Biochem 218(2):335–344
8. Domanski M, Hertzog M, Coutant J, Gutsche-Perelroizen I,
Bontems F, Carlier MF, Guittet E, van Heijenoort C (2004) J Biol
Chem 279(22):23637–23645. doi:10.1074/jbc.M311413200
9. Folk JE, Chung SI (1985) Methods Enzymol 113:358–375
10. Goodall GJ, Morgan JI, Horecker BL (1983) Arch Biochem
Biophys 221(2):598–601
11. Gorman JJ, Folk JE (1981) J Biol Chem 256(6):2712–2715
12. Graser TA, Godel HG, Albers S, Foldi P, Furst P (1985) Anal
Biochem 151(1):142–152
13. Greenberg CS, Birckbichler PJ, Rice RH (1991) FASEB J
5(15):3071–3077
14. Hannappel E, Kalbacher H, Voelter W (1988) Arch Biochem
Biophys 260(2):546–551
15. Hannappel E, Leibold W (1985) Arch Biochem Biophys
240(1):236–241
16. Hannappel E, van Kampen M (1987) J Chromatogr 397:279–285
17. Hertzog M, Yarmola EG, Didry D, Bubb MR, Carlier MF (2002) J
Biol Chem 277(17):14786–14792. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112064200
18. Hinkel R, El-Aouni C, Olson T, Horstkotte J, Mayer S, Muller S,
Willhauck M, Spitzweg C, Gildehaus FJ, Munzing W, Hannappel
E, Bock-Marquette I, DiMaio JM, Hatzopoulos AK, Boekstegers
P, Kupatt C (2008) Circulation 117(17):2232–2240. doi:10.1161/
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.758904
19. Huang LC, Jean D, Proske RJ, Reins RY, McDermott AM (2007)
Curr Eye Res 32(7–8):595–609. doi:10.1080/02713680701446653
20. Huff T, Ballweber E, Humeny A, Bonk T, Becker C, Muller CS,
Mannherz HG, Hannappel E (1999) FEBS Lett 464(1–2):14–20
21. Huff T, Hannappel E (1997) Anal Chim Acta 352:249–255
22. Huff T, Muller CS, Otto AM, Netzker R, Hannappel E (2001) Int
J Biochem Cell Biol 33(3):205–220
23. Huff T, Muller CSG, Hannappel E (1997) Anal Chim Acta
352:239–248
24. Huff T, Otto AM, Muller CS, Meier M, Hannappel E (2002)
FASEB J 16(7):691–696
25. Huff T, Zerzawy D, Hannappel E (1995) Eur J Biochem
230(2):650–657
26. Irobi E, Aguda AH, Larsson M, Guerin C, Yin HL, Burtnick LD,
Blanchoin L, Robinson RC (2004) EMBO J 23(18):3599–3608.
doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600372
27. Knop J, App C, Horn AHC, Iavarone F, Castagnola M, Hann-
appel E (2013) Biochemistry (Mosc). doi:10.1021/bi400664k
28. Low TL, Hu SK, Goldstein AL (1981) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
78(2):1162–1166
29. Makogonenko E, Goldstein AL, Bishop PD, Medved L (2004)
Biochemistry (Mosc) 43(33):10748–10756. doi:10.1021/
bi049253l
30. Malinda KM, Goldstein AL, Kleinman HK (1997) FASEB J
11(6):474–481
31. Malinda KM, Sidhu GS, Mani H, Banaudha K, Maheshwari RK,
Goldstein AL, Kleinman HK (1999) J Invest Dermatol
113(3):364–368. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00708.x
32. Mannherz HG, Dansranjavin T, Gremm D, Mazur A, Sokoll A,
Hannappel E, Jockusch BM (2008). Paper presented at the DGZ,
Marburg
33. Mannherz HG, Hannappel E (2009) Cell Motil Cytoskel. doi:10.
1002/cm.20371
34. Martin A, Giuliano A, Collaro D, De Vivo G, Sedia C, Serretiello
E, Gentile V (2013) Amino Acids 44(1):111–118. doi:10.1007/
s00726-011-1081-1
35. Morris DC, Chopp M, Zhang L, Lu M, Zhang ZG (2010) Neuro-
science 169(2):674–682. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.05.017
36. Pardee JD, Spudich JA (1982) Methods Enzymol 85 Pt
B:164–181
37. Paunola E, Mattila PK, Lappalainen P (2002) FEBS Lett
513(1):92–97
38. Safer D, Chowrashi PK (1997) Cell Motil Cytoskel
38(2):163–171
39. Safer D, Elzinga M, Nachmias VT (1991) J Biol Chem
266(7):4029–4032
40. Safer D, Golla R, Nachmias VT (1990) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
87:2536–2540
41. Safer D, Sosnick TR, Elzinga M (1997) Biochemistry (Mosc)
36(19):5806–5816. doi:10.1021/bi970185v
42. Smart N, Bollini S, Dube KN, Vieira JM, Zhou B, Davidson S,
Yellon D, Riegler J, Price AN, Lythgoe MF, Pu WT, Riley PR
(2011) Nature 474(7353):640–644. doi:10.1038/nature10188
43. Smart N, Risebro CA, Melville AA, Moses K, Schwartz RJ,
Chien KR, Riley PR (2007) Nature 445(7124):177–182. doi:10.
1038/nature05383
44. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH,
Provenzano MD, Fujimoto EK, Goeke NM, Olson BJ, Klenk DC
(1985) Anal Biochem 150(1):76–85
45. Sopko N, Qin Y, Finan A, Dadabayev A, Chigurupati S, Qin J,
Penn MS, Gupta S (2011) PLoS ONE 6(5):e20184. doi:10.1371/
journal.pone.0020184
46. Sosne G, Albeiruti AR, Hollis B, Siddiqi A, Ellenberg D, Ku-
rpakus-Wheater M (2006). Exp Eye Res
47. Sosne G, Chan CC, Thai K, Kennedy M, Szliter EA, Hazlett LD,
Kleinman HK (2001) Exp Eye Res 72(5):605–608
48. Sosne G, Christopherson PL, Barrett RP, Fridman R (2005)
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46(7):2388–2395
49. Sosne G, Siddiqi A, Kurpakus-Wheater M (2004) Invest Oph-
thalmol Vis Sci 45(4):1095–1100
50. Sosne G, Szliter EA, Barrett R, Kernacki KA, Kleinman H,
Hazlett LD (2002) Exp Eye Res 74(2):293–299
51. Sosne G, Xu L, Prach L, Mrock LK, Kleinman HK, Letterio JJ,
Hazlett LD, Kurpakus-Wheater M (2004) Exp Cell Res
293(1):175–183
52. Touati J, Angelini A, Hinner MJ, Heinis C (2011) ChemBioChem
12(1):38–42. doi:10.1002/cbic.201000451
Thymosin b4 and Tissue Transglutaminase 491
123
53. Tucholski J, Johnson GV (2002) J Neurochem 81(4):780–791
54. Van Troys M, Ono K, Dewitte D, Jonckheere V, De Ruyck N,
Vandekerckhove J, Ono S, Ampe C (2004) Mol Biol Cell
15(10):4735–4748. doi:10.1091/mbc.E04-03-0225
55. Vancompernolle K, Vandekerckhove J, Bubb MR, Korn ED
(1991) J Biol Chem 266(23):15427–15431
56. Weber A, Nachmias VT, Pennise CR, Pring M, Safer D (1992)
Biochemistry (Mosc) 31(27):6179–6185
57. Yoo JO, Lim YC, Kim YM, Ha KS (2012) J Biol Chem
287(18):14377–14388. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.326074
58. Zarbock J, Oschkinat H, Hannappel E, Kalbacher H, Voelter W,
Holak TA (1990) Biochemistry (Mosc) 29(34):7814–7821
59. Zoubek RE, Hannappel E (2007) Ann N Y Acad Sci
1112:442–450. doi:10.1196/annals.1415.031
492 C. App et al.
123