transforming end of life care in acute hospitals pm workshop 3: vital signs ‘making measurement...

70
Vital signs – making measures matter Transforming End of Life Care in Acute Hospitals Sean Manning 18 th November 2015

Upload: nhs-improving-quality

Post on 13-Feb-2017

474 views

Category:

Healthcare


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Vital signs – making measures matter

Transforming End of Life Care in Acute HospitalsSean Manning

18th November 2015

The black hole?

“We call our measures board the ‘wall of shame’”

“ Most of what we collect seems meaningless to us. We rarely see the 

results of what we submit.”

This paperwork is stopping us doing our job!”

Insights into

• Importance of measurement• Traditions of measurement• Knowing How We are Doing• Pareto principle• Structure ‐ process ‐ outcome measures• Driver diagrams• Model for improvement• Tracking variation• 7 steps to measurement

Hitting the target but missing the point!

Measurement for improvement

UnderstandUnderstand

ImproveImprove

MotivateMotivate

Curiosity

“I can make the last stage of my life as good as possible because everyone works together confidently, honestly and consistently to help me and the people who are important to me, including my carer(s).”

The traditions of measurement

• eg A‐B comparison, average, huge dataset

Research

• eg one‐to‐many benchmarking comparision, average, large dataset

Judgement

• eg continual analysis of single changing process over time

Improvement

Research Judgement Improvement

GoalNew knowledge (not its applicability)

ComparisonReward / punishmentSpur for change

Process understanding

Evaluating a change

Hypothesis Fixed None Multiple and flexible

Measures Many Very few Few

Time period Long, past Long, past Short, current

Sample Large Large Small

Confounders Measure or control Describe and try to measure

Consider but rarely measured

Risks in improvement 

settings

Ignores time based variation

Over‐engineers data collection

Ignores time based variation

Over‐reaction to natural variation

Incorrectly perceived as ‘inferior statistics’ 

Measurement mindsets

Based on L Solberg, G Mosser and S McDonald (1997) The Three Faces of Performance Measurement: Improvement, Accountability and Research, Journal on Quality Improvement, 23 (3): 135 ‐ 147. 

What mind sets are at play here?

Research

ImprovementJudgement

What do we collect now?

What does a great team meeting look like?Is that what we do?

SMART goals

Making better decisions about prioritiesFocusing your effort where it matters

Prioritisation - The Pareto Principle

The Principle

We don’t have time to improve everything

A small number of issues account for the majority of the challenge

20% of causes account for 80% of the problem

We should focus on the ‘critical few’, not the ‘trivial many’

What does it look like?

Interruptions in surgeries

Tally by GPs of the causes of interruptions while with a patient.

Category CountSign script ‐ contraception 72Sign script ‐minor illness nurse 18Clinical query ‐ learner 18Clinical query ‐ NP 24Sign script ‐ urgent 78Chaperone 198Equipment search 60Admin info 312Clinical query ‐ GP 66Panic button 6Cancellation msg 588Other 72TOTALS 1512

0100200300400500600700

Count

What does it look like?

Interruptions in surgeries

Tally by GPs of the causes of interruptions while seeing patients.

Category Count % of TotalCancellation msg 588 38.9Admin info 312 20.6Chaperone 198 13.1Sign script ‐ urgent 78 5.2Other 72 4.8Sign script ‐ contraception 72 4.8Clinical query ‐ GP 66 4.4Equipment search 60 4Clinical query ‐ NP 24 1.6Clinical query ‐ learner 18 1.2Sign script ‐minor illness nurse 18 1.2Panic button 6 0.4TOTALS 1512 100

051015202530354045

% of Total

What does it look like?

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

% of Total

Cumulative %

What does it look like?

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

% of Total

Cumulative %

Three categories of interruption (17%) account for 73% of the problem

What to measure?

Structure Process Outcome

Avedis Donabedian

‘Outcomes remain the ultimate validators of the effectiveness and quality of medical care’ but they ‘must be used with discrimination’

The environment in which care occurs

What care is delivered, and how

The impact on patients and the 

population

What to measure?

Structure Process Outcome

o Outcomes are a worthy goalo All have pros & conso Should measure a selection of all 

threeVeena Ralegh

What to measure?

Structure Process Outcome

“Intermediate outcomes”• a common solution• properties of both process & outcome• but be careful to acknowledge it’s not ‘the ultimate outcome’

OUTP

UTS

HUMAN FACTORS

HUMANFACTORS

INTERNAL PROCESSES & PROCECEDURES

INPU

TSEXTERNALFACTORS

Process Measure(s)

Outcome 

Measure(s)

Balancing Measure(s)

What to measure?

Is it being done?

Is it working?

Unintended consequences?

Is it in place?

Structure Measure(s)

Metrics for different audiences

Board

Service managers

Project managers

Frontline staff

Focus onoutcome

Focus onprocess

Relevant process +outcome measures

Relevant process +outcome measures

Higher level outcomemeasures

Highest level outcomemeasures

Driver Diagrams

Benefits ...build complex strategyimmediatevisual

Different scenarios ...1. Help generate change ideas2. Marshall a mass of change ideas3. Survive failure / the unexpected

avoid “silver bullet” thinkinghighlight overlooked ideas

Aim

Defect FreeSurgery

Avoid Mistakes

AvoidComplications

AvoidDelays

Driver Intervention

Conduct team brief

Conduct team debrief

Conduct time out

Produce accurate lists

Implement SSI bundle

Implement VTE bundle

Have correct kit to hand

Ensure staff adequately trained

O1

O2

O3

O1 Overall glitch countO2 Never eventsO3 Number of surgical site infections

P1 % lists with Team BriefP2 % lists with Team DebriefP3 % compliance with SSI bundle

P2

P1

P3

Driver Diagrams clinical example

AIM –an improved system

Primary driver 1

Primary driver 2How much? By when?

Secondary driver 1

Secondary driver 2

Secondary driver 3

Secondary driver 4

Secondary driver 5

CP1

CP2

CP3

CP4

CP5

CP6

CP7

How much? By when?

How much? By when?

AIM PRIMARYDRIVERS

SECONDARYDRIVERS

CHANGEPROJECTS

Driver DiagramsPlanning & presenting change

CauseEffectDrives

Driver DiagramsWeight loss example

Pedometer

Gym work out 3 days

Squash weekends

No pub weekdays

Take packed lunch

Low fat meals

Buy only 1 sandwich

Water bottle for work bag

Fruit for dessert

Put away the large glasses

Put cycling days in diary

Cycling kit out night before

Get rid of Oyster cardBe more

active during the

day

Do sport

Drink less alcohol

Substitute lower

calorie foods

Eat lessReducecalories in

Increasecalories out

Take stairs

2 stone weight loss

in 6/12

AIM

Improveaccess

Help marshal change ideas

Waiting room info, list clinician interests/languages, web info, Rx access (Feel Better Faster), signpost more (WIC/HV/minor inj/Secs/DNs/A&E), Chronic disease training, care planning, review periods, get it right first time, test results processing, teamworking/multiskilling, results line hours, protocols for test results, widen skill mix, BP machine in watiting room, update rpt Rx, pharmacist planning, streamline processes, streamline recalls, education & reflection, up‐to‐date pt contact details, know what appt is for, pt registration management, Triage, Care planning / pathways, more TelC, emailC, clinical buddies/teams, test results, repeat Rx, forwarding tasks + results, check + update usual GP, results actioned by right person, advance appt booking, reserve list, ask pt who they want, rota in advance, notekeeping w plan + pt info, Consult skills, comp skills, speed reading/typing, forms + equipment, multi‐skilling, longer appts, No emerg appts, Test results, Care planning, High risk processes, Referral chase‐up, results continuity, streamline processes, streamline recalls, clear up alerts,  handling of normal results, self‐checkin, fast‐track queue 

AIM PRIMARYDRIVERS

SECONDARYDRIVERS

CHANGEPROJECTS

Improveaccess

Doctors (capacity)

Demand

Dealing (efficiency)

Appt system

Supply of GP time

Organisation of GP time

Pt help‐seeking

Deflecting demand

Creating our own workload

Planning care

Appt system project

GP rota change project

Community education

Waiting room TV

PILS & CDs & DVDs 

Feel better faster

Student sick notes

Reception signposting

Test results

Consulting skills

Longer appts

Guaranteed interpreters

Help marshal change ideas

Dealing w failed referrals

Chronic disease pathways

Review periods

More TelC’s

Email appts

Continuity

AIM PRIMARYDRIVERS

SECONDARYDRIVERS

CHANGEPROJECTS

Improveaccess

Doctors (capacity)

Demand

Dealing (efficiency)

Appt system

Supply of GP time

Organisation of GP time

Pt help‐seeking

Deflecting demand

Creating our own workload

Planning care

Appt system project

GP rota change project

Community education

Waiting room TV

PILS & CDs & DVDs 

Feel better faster

Student sick notes

Reception signposting

Test results

Consulting skills

Longer appts

Guaranteed interpreters

Survive failure / the unexpected

Dealing w failed referrals

Chronic disease pathways

Review periods

More TelC’s

Email appts

Continuity

Telephone triage

Adapted from the Transform National Steering Group 2011, with input from the NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement

How much?By when?

Different audiences

Board

Service managers

Project managers

Frontline staff

What to measure?

AIM –an improved system

Primary driver 1

Primary driver 2

Secondary driver 1

Secondary driver 2

Secondary driver 3

Secondary driver 4

Secondary driver 5

CP1

CP2

CP3

CP4

CP5

CP6

CP7

What to measure?Add metrics to your driver diagram

Structure Process Outcome Balance

How much?

By when?

What is our baseline?

How do we get it?

1. Identify measures for your aim, a primary driver and a secondary driver using each of these four prompts

2. For each measure record your answer to these two questions

3. For each measure record your answer to these two questions 

How much & how often?

There is no precise science to guide decisions about how many metrics to use, or how often…

How many different thingsare you monitoring consciously?

How frequently?

Straight motorwayReversing round a corner

The usual approach

Meeting rooms

Real world

Approve 

Design Design Design Design

Implement !

Courtesy of Patient Safety First

Opinion

Meeting rooms

Real world

Courtesy of Patient Safety First

Implement  

Approve 

Test & refine

Test & refine

Test & refine

Design

Measurement

Change through small steps

Change ...• with a clear purpose• you can learn from (without fear of failure)• which is less exhausting• with fewer unintended consequences• which builds engagement and optimism

What are we trying to accomplish?

How will we know that change is an improvement?

What change can we make that will result in improvement?

The Model for Improvement

Langley, G., Nolan, K., and Nolan, T., 1994. The Foundation of Improvement, Quality Progress, June 1994

Plan-Do-Study-Act

disciplined framework ensures every part is done every time

Plan-Do-Study-Act

facilitates rapid prototyping and rolling out of new ideas

Plan-Do-Study-Act

“We’re pressed for time, so we’ll be jumping to conclusions”

We’re pressed for time, so we’ll be jumping to conclusions

The Manager’s Dilemma

In order to manage a system, we are required to make predictionsabout its future.

How do you look at your data ?

“If I stick my right foot in a bucket of boiling water and my left foot in

a bucket of ice water, on the average, I’m pretty comfortable.”

The Problem with Averages

The Problem

Aggregated data presented in tabular formats or with summary

statistics, will not help you measure the impact of improvement efforts. Aggregated data can only lead to judgment, not to improvement.

Enumerative Dynamic

Did things improve?

What will happen next?

Should we do something?

Smoking Cessation :Percentage of smokers who have quit smoking after 4 week programme

INTERVENTION

1C-58

50%

55%

60%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

10/3

/200

7

10/1

7/20

07

10/3

1/20

07

11/1

4/20

07

11/2

8/20

07

12/1

2/20

07

12/2

6/20

07

1/9/

2008

1/23

/200

8

2/6/

2008

2/20

/200

8

3/5/

2008

3/19

/200

8

Change made here

Did things improve?

What will happen next?

Should we do something?

Smoking Cessation :Percentage of smokers who have quit smoking after 4 week programme

Protocol introduced

Letter from

Clinical Director

Pharmacy included

% surgical patients receiving Prophylactic Antibiotics

0102030405060708090

100

Apr

-07

May

-07

Jun-

07

Jul-0

7

Aug

-07

Sep

-07

Oct

-07

Nov

-07

Dec

-07

Jan-

08

Feb-

08

Mar

-08

Apr

-08

May

-08

% re

conc

iled

Run Chart

Waiting time results

70

35

01020304050607080

AvgBeforeChange

Avg AfterChange

Wai

t Ti

me

(min

.)

Waiting time results0

102030405060708090

100

date

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May Jun

Jul

Aug Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Change MadeC

ycle T

ime (m

in.)

0102030405060708090

100

date

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May Jun

Jul

Aug Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Change Made

Cyc

le T

ime

(min

.)

Unit 1

Unit 3

0102030405060708090

100

date

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May Jun

Jul

Aug Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Change MadeC

ycle

Tim

e (m

in.)

Unit 270

35

01020304050607080

AvgBeforeChange

Avg AfterChange

Wai

t Ti

me

(min

.)

If We Have 3 Numbers in Sequence:How Do You Report These?

Downward Trend

Upward Trend

Some Recovery

Setback

Collapse

Dramatic Recovery

Each pattern has an equal 1:6 chance

Lets Get Scientific!

Data has no meaning without a

Context

Run ChartsPlot the dots

0102030405060708090

100

date

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May Ju

n

Jul

Aug Se

p

Oct

Nov

Dec

Change Made

Cyc

le T

ime

(min

.)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Consecutive trips

Min.

My Trip To Work

Mean

Common Cause

Special Cause

Statistical Process Control(SPC) Charts:

No of Adm

issions

0

200

150

100

50

250

Performance Report – Number of Admissions

Week1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

No Admissions          Median          Lower Limit (66.5)          Upper Limit (222.4)

65

It is normalto have some variation

But some may be‘special’

Control charts

2 Ways To Improve A Process

If controlled variation (Common Cause)• process is stable

• variation is inherent to process

• therefore, process must be changed i.e. Redesign 

If uncontrolled variation (Special Cause)• process is unstable

• variation is extrinsic to process

• cause should be identified and “treated”

7 steps to measurement

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Za1o77jAnbw&list=PL_V1d0Y94nv4u2yCCDnApxa9ykKmSG1oE

Insights into

• Importance of measurement• Traditions of measurement• Knowing How We are Doing• Pareto principle• Structure ‐ process ‐ outcome measures• Driver diagrams• Model for improvement• Tracking variation• 7 steps to measurement

What do you need from your data?