trends in emergency admissions in england 2004-2009

17
© Nuffield Trust July 2010 Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Upload: nuffield-trust

Post on 20-Jun-2015

426 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

© Nuffield Trust July 2010

Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Page 2: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Why emergency admissions?

Emergency hospital admission is: • Undesirable • Expensive • Recorded in routine data

and • Thought to be increasing in number

© Nuffield Trust

Page 3: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Are emergency admissions rising?

Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency?

Possible reasons •Aging population •Public expectations •More treatable illness •Defensive medicine •Central targets/ Payment by Results •Changes in other linked services •Over reliance on A&E for urgent care Number of emergency admissions in England 1996-2009,

with period investigated marked in red

Page 4: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency

Is it just emergency admissions?

Page 5: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Our analysis

The aims of the research were to: • Unpick the rise in admissions • Highlight characteristics of excess admissions • Explore variation at hospital and area level This work used the Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) dataset to examine monthly emergency admissions over a five year period from April 2004 to March 2009.

© Nuffield Trust

Page 6: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Is the increase due to more readmissions?

Page 7: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

2

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2004

04

2004

06

2004

08

2004

10

2004

12

2005

02

2005

04

2005

06

2005

08

2005

10

2005

12

2006

02

2006

04

2006

06

2006

08

2006

10

2006

12

2007

02

2007

04

2007

06

2007

08

2007

10

2007

12

2008

02

2008

04

2008

06

2008

08

2008

10

2008

12

2009

02

Em

erge

ncy

bed

days

(milli

ons)

Not clipped

Clipped 3 months

Estimated cost of the rise in emergency admissions is equivalent to at least an additional £330 million in 2008/09 (compared to 2004/05 activity costed at 2008/09 payment levels). However, the actual value is likely to be higher due to inflation in the tariff over time and payment for non-tariff work.

How does the rise consume resources?

Page 8: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Is the pattern of stay length changing?

Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency?

Number of emergency admissions categorised by emergency bed days (EBDs) used in spell, excluding spells in mental health and undefined Healthcare Resource Groups (HRGs) 2001-2009

Page 9: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency

Is the increase related to age?

Page 10: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Has the case mix of emergency admissions changed?

Page 11: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Emergency admissions that end in death, showing observed deaths, expected deaths (standardised for age, sex, and HRG at 2004/05 rates) and percentage of total emergency admissions

Has the case fatality rate changed?

-1%

1%

3%

5%

7%

9%

11%

13%

15%

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

2004

04

2004

06

2004

08

2004

10

2004

12

2005

02

2005

04

2005

06

2005

08

2005

10

2005

12

2006

02

2006

04

2006

06

2006

08

2006

10

2006

12

2007

02

2007

04

2007

06

2007

08

2007

10

2007

12

2008

02

2008

04

2008

06

2008

08

2008

10

2008

12

2009

02

Dea

ths

Observed Expected Percentage of emergency admissions that end with death

Page 12: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Is the rise linked to the A&E target in England?

Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency?

Trade-off analysis between four-hour target breaches and short stay emergency admissions in England (all A&E types)

Page 13: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Is the rise linked to the A&E target in particular trusts?

Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency

Trade-off analysis between four-hour target breaches and short stay emergency admissions in another trust (all A&E types)

Page 14: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Do all PCTs show the same pattern?

Reproduced from Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004-2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency?

(a) Age and sex standardised emergency admission ratio in 2004/05 (green, lowest, to red, highest)

(b) Absolute increase by 2008/09 (blue, dark = highest, light = lowest)

Page 15: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

The evidence in summary...

Possible reason Comments Aging population Accounts for some of the increase, but not all Public expectations Increased demand for health services More treatable illness

No significant change in case mix, although vague symptoms increase disproportionately

Defensive medicine

The increase is due to short stay admissions; but could be many other explanations for these...

Central targets/Payment by Results

No evidence of 4-hour target driving systematic increase, and slightly pre-dates PbR

Change in other linked services

Could regional variation in the increase be a symptom of this?

Over reliance on A&E for urgent care

A&E attendance is increasing, as are admissions through A&E

Page 16: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

Efficiency breeds inefficiency paradox?

Provider efficiency System inefficiency

Better and more efficient care

Reduction in length of stay

More beds available

Admission threshold reduced

Lower acuity cases using costly inpatient care

Less severe cases admitted

Page 17: Trends in Emergency Admissions in England 2004-2009

www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk

Sign-up for our newsletter www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/newsletter

Follow us on Twitter (http://twitter.com/NuffieldTrust)

July 2010 © Nuffield Trust