DISTRICT: ____________

DISTRIK: _____________

NAME OF SCHOOL

NAAM VAN SKOOL

EDUCATOR(S)

OPVOEDER(S)

ECONOMICS CAPS/EKONOMIE KABV

POA MODERATION DOCUMENT Gr 10 / Gr 11 / Gr 12 2015+

PVA MODERERINGSDOKUMENT Gr 10 / Gr 11 / Gr 12 2015+

CONTENTS/INHOUD

Who must complete?

Wie moet voltooi

When must it be completed?

Wanneer moet dit voltooi word

A: INTERNAL MODERATION

INTERNE MODERERING

Subject Specialist (Peer teacher/Subject head/HOD) per Task/Test/Exam

Vak spesialis (Mede-vakonderwyser/VakhoofDH) per taak/toets/eks.

Throughout year

Deur die jaar

B: CLUSTER OR DESK OR FACE MODERATION

OF CASS ITEMS / KLUSTER OF KANTOOR OF

KONTAKMODERERING VAN DASS ITEMS

Cluster moderator / Curr adviser

Kluster moderators / Kurr adviseur

Throughout year

Deur die jaar

C: FINAL MODERATION SUMMARY

FINALE MODERERINGS OPSOMMING

Curriculum Adviser / Curr planner

Kurrikulum Adviseur / Kurr beplanner

Final Moderation and Verification

Finale Moderering en Verifikasie

A: INTERNAL MODERATION / INTERNE MODERERING

Internal moderation needs to take place for every POA activity. It needs to take place before the Task/Test if given to the learners, and after it has been marked.

Interne moderering moet by elke PVA aktiwiteit gedoen word. Dit moet plaasvind voor die taak/Toets aan die leerders gegee word en ook nadat dit gemerk is.

Please hand the attached checklist to the internal moderator (Peer teacher/Subject Head/HOD/teacher from a neighbouring school/etc) along with the task/test/exam to be moderated, and again with the scripts after they have been marked.

Oorhandig asseblief die aangehegde kontrolelys per taak/toets/eksamen aand die interne moderator (Mede-onderwyser/vakhoof/DH/onderwyser van naburige skool, ens) tesame met die taak/toets/eksamenvraestel en nasien-instrument wat gemodereer moet word, asook weer tesame met die skrifte nadat dit nagesien is.

Use the colour pen indicated below/Gebruik die kleur pen hieronder aangedui:

Level 1/Vlak 1:School, Internal Mod/Skool Interne mod:

GREEN/GROEN

Level 2/Vlak 2: District/: Cluster: Peer teacher/Curr adviser

Desk/Face Moderation: Curr adviser

Distrik: Kluster: Mede Onderwyser/Kurr adviseur

Kantoor/Kontakmoderering – Kurr adviseur BROWN/PINK // BRUIN/ PIENK

Level 3/Vlak 3: Deputy Chief Education Specialist

ORANGE

(or at CA at Provincial Moderation level)

Adjunk Hoofonderwyskundige

(of KA tydens provinsiale moderering)

Level 4/Vlak 4: UMALUSI

PURPLE/PERS

ASSIGNMENT 1

EXEMPLAR TASK?

WERKOPDRAG 1

VOORBEELD TAAK?

WERKOPDRAG 1

ASSIGNMENT 1

HOOFONDER-WERP & Sub-Onderwerp€:

MAIN TOPIC & Sub-topic(s)

MARK ALLOCATION

PUNTETOEKENNING

DATE HANDED OUT:

DATE TOBE HANDED IN:

DATE

DATUM

LEARNER 1 EVIDENCE/LEERDER 1 BEWYSE

LEARNER 2 EVIDENCE/LEERDER 2 BEWYSE

Name of learner

Naam van leerder

From level 2 Mod:

From level 2 Mod:

Mark Allocated

Punt toegeken

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Gemiddelde punte

Average mark

Gemiddelde %

Average %

(√ or X)

Int

Dis

Prov

Comment/Opm

Is die opdrag van ‘n opskrif voorsien/(naam van skool, vak, graad, datum, taak)?

Is the assignment provided with a heading/(name of school, subject, grade, date, task)?

Is die opdrag gebaseer op inhoud van graad 10/11/12 volgens jaarlikse onderrigplan?

Is the assignment based on the content of grade 10/11/12 in accordance with annual teaching plan?

Is die Hoofonderwerp(s) en Sub-onderwerpe op die opdrag aangebring?

Are the Main topics/Sub-topics indicated on the assignment?

Het die leerders duidelike en gedetailleerde instruksies ontvang?

Did the learners receive clear and detailed instructions?

Sluit die vrae ‘n verskeidenheid van vrae in: Gevallestudies, scenarios, Data-respons, en ander brongebaseerde vrae,bv Tabelle, grafieke

Do the questions include a variety, e.g. Case Studies, Scenarios and, Data response, other source based questions, e.g. Tables, Graphs

Sluit vrae verskillende vlakke volgens Bloom se taksonomie in? bv. Bespreek, Motiveer, Vergelyk, Onderskei, Verduidelik, ens

Do questions include different levels of questioning according to Bloom? E.g.Discuss, Motivate, Compare, Differentiate, Explain etc

Voldoen die opdrag se vrae aan die volgende kognitiewe vlakke: Laer orde: 30% Middelorde 40%, Hoër orde 30%

Do the questions comply with the following levels of complexity: Lower order: 30%, Middle order 40%, Higher order: 30%

Is leerders datums gegee vir monitering, inlewering en assessering van taak? /

Did the learners receive time frames for monitoring, due date and assessment of task?

Is die Assesseringsinstrument (memorandum) volledig?

Is the Assessment tool (memorandum) complete?

Is die Taak intern gemodereer?

Was the Assignment moderated internally?

BEWYS VAN LEERDERS SE PRESTASIE

EVIDENCE OF LEARNERS PERFORMANCE

Is 10% van die opdragte gemodereer? / Have 10% of the assignments been moderated?

Het die opvoeder volgens die memorandum of assesseringsinstrument nagesien?

Did the educator mark according to the memorandum or assessment tool?

Is die finale uitslag ʼn ware weergawe van die standaard van die leerder se werkverrigting? *

Does the final mark given to the learner reflect the standard of the learner’s actual work?

Is die punte korrek opgetel?

Were marks added correctly?

Is die punte (%) / kodes korrek opgeteken op die punteblad?

Was the marks (%) codes recorded correctly on mark sheet?

ALGEMENE KOMMENTAAR/GENERAL COMMENTS

Internal/Interne Moderator: ______________ Signature/Handtekening: _______________ Date/Datum: ________

NAME OF CLUSTERMODERATOR:

SCHOOL:

NAAM VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: …………………………………..SKOOL: ______________________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER MODERATOR:

HANDTEKENING VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

CURRICULUM ADVISER / KURRIKULUM ADVISEUR: ……………………………………… Date/Datum: _____________

DEPUTY CHIEF EDUCATION SPECIALIST (Or Provincial Moderator) …………… Date/Datum: _____________

ADJUNK HOOFONDERWYSKUNDIGE (Of Provinsiale modereerder)

NAME OF SCHOOL

NAAM VAN SKOOL……………………………………………………………………………

CONTROL TEST 1

EXEMPLAR TASK?

KONTROLE TOETS 1

VOORBEELD TAAK?

CONTROL TEST 1

KONTROLE TOETS 1

Main topic(s) and Topics covered

Hoofonderwerp en Onderwerpe gedek

MARK ALLOCATION

PUNTETOEKENNING

TIME ALLOCATION

TYD TOEKENNING

DATE

DATUM

LEARNER 1 EVIDENCE /LEERDER 1 BEWYSE

LEARNER 2 EVIDENCE / LEERDER 2 BEWYSE

Name of learner

Naam van leerder

From level 2 Moderation:

From level 2 Moderation:

Mark Allocated

Punt toegeken

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Gemiddelde punte

Average mark

Gemiddelde %

Average %

(√ or X)

Int

Dis

Prov

Comments/Opmerking

Is die toets van ‘n opskrif voorsien/(naam van skool, vak, graad, datum, taak)?

Is the test provided with a heading/(name of school, subject, grade, date, task)?

Is die tydstoekenning van die toets korrek? (100 punte vir 1 uur) Afd A 20/B 40/C 40

Is the time allocated to the test correct? (100 marks for 1 hour) Section A 20/B 40/C40

Is die Hoofonderwerp/Sub Onderwerpe op die toets aangebring? Makro-ekonomie

Are the Main Topics and Sub-Topics indicated on the test? Macro Economics

Maak die vraestel voorsiening vir verskillende vlakke van vraagstelling? Bv.

Does the paper make provision for different levels of questioning? i.e.

Afdeling A: Veelvuldige keuse (5x2) Afpaar (6x1) Gee omskrywing van ekon terme/Gee een woord (4x1) [20]

Section A: Mult choice (5x2) Matching (6x1) Describe meaning of econ terms/Give one term: (4x1) (Lower order) [20]

Afdeling B: Gee twee vrae/leerders doen een:

Noem (2x1) Verduidelik (2x1)Datarespons 1 (10) Datarespons 2 (10) Bespreek ens Middelorde (2x4) Bespreel ens Middelorde (2x4) [40]

Section B:Provide two questions – learners choose one:

Name (2x1) Explain (2x1)Data response Q1 (10) Data response Q2 (10) Explain etc Middle order (2x4) Discuss etc Middle order (2x4) [40]

Afdeling C: Gee twee vrae – leerder doen een.

Kan opsteltipe of Nie-opsteltipe wees bv. Verslag/Minuut / Memorandum / Formele brief

Bestaande uit: Inleiding 2 Hoofvraag 26 Addisionele vraag (Hoër Orde denke) 10 Gevolgtrekking 2

[40]

Section C: Provide two questions – learner chooses one.

Can be Essay responses and Non-essay responses e.g. Report/ Minutes/ Memorandum/ Formal letter

Consisting of: Introduction 2 Main question 26 Addtional question (HOT) 10 Concl 2[40]

Is die Assesseringsinstrument (memorandum) volledig en korrek?

Is the Assessment tool (memorandum) complete and correct?

Is die Kontrole Toets intern gemodereer?

Was the Controlled test moderated internally?

BEWYS VAN LEERDERS SE PRESTASIE

EVIDENCE OF LEARNERS PERFORMANCE

Is 10% van die skrifte gemodereer? / Have 10% of the scripts been moderated?

Het die opvoeder volgens die memorandum of assesseringsinstrument nagesien?

Did the educator mark according to the memorandum or assessment tool?

Is die punte korrek opgetel?

Were marks added correctly?

Is die punte (%) / kodes korrek opgeteken op die punteblad?

Was the marks (%) codes recorded correctly on mark sheet?

ALGEMENE KOMMENTAAR/GENERAL COMMENTS

Internal/Interne Moderator: ______________ Signature/Handtekening: _______________ Date/Datum: ________

NAME OF CLUSTERMODERATOR:

SCHOOL:

NAAM VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: _____________________SKOOL: ______________________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER MODERATOR:

HANDTEKENING VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: ……………………………. Date/Datum: ______________

CURRICULUM ADVISER / KURRIKULUM ADVISEUR: ……………………………………… Date/Datum: ______________

DEPUTY CHIEF EDUCATION SPECIALIST (Provincial Moderation) ……………………………. Date/Datum: _______________

ADJUNK HOOFONDERWYSKUNDIGE (Provinsiale Moderering)

RESEARCH PROJECT

EXEMPLAR TASK?

NAVORSINGPROJEK

VOORBEELD TAAK?

RESEARCH PROJECT

NAVORSINGSPROJEK

TOPIC

ONDERWERP

Grade 11: Nedbank/Treasury/WCED Bursary competition recommended (English only)

MARK ALLOCATION

PUNTETOEKENNING

DATE TASK HANDED OUT:

DATUM OPDRAG AAN LRDRS GEGEE:

DATE

DATUM

LEARNER 1 EVIDENCE 1/LEERDER 1 BEWYSE1

LEARNER 2 EVIDENCE/LEERDER 2 BEWYSE

Name of learner

Naam van leerder

From level 2 Moderation:

From level 2 Moderation:

Mark Allocated

Punt toegeken

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Gemiddelde punte

Average mark

Gemiddelde %

Average %

(√ or X)

Int

Dis

Prov

Comment/Opm

Is die projek gebaseer op inhoud van graad 10/11/12 voorgeskryf deur KABV Jrlkse Onderrigplan?

Is the project based on the content of grade 10/11/12 prescribed by CAPS Annual Teaching Plan?

Is die projek van ‘n opskrif voorsien/(naam van skool, vak, graad, datum, taak)?

Is the project provided with a heading/(name of school, subject, grade, date, task)?

Is die Hoofonderwerp en Sub-onderwerpe op die projek aangebring?

Are the Main Topic and Sub topics indicated on the project?

Het leerders die assesseringskriteria saam met die taak ontvang?

Did learners receive the assessment criteria with the task?

Het die leerders duidelike en gedetailleerde instruksies ontvang?

Did the learners receive clear and detailed instructions?

a) Lengte, voorblad, inhoudsopgawe / Number of pages, cover page, index

b) Aantal, sort en funksionele gebruik van bronne / Number, type and functional use of sources

c) Bibliografie / Bibliography

Is leerders datums gegee vir monitering, inlewering en assessering van taak? /

Did the learners receive time frames for monitoring, due date and assessment of task?

Is die Assesseringsinstrument (rubriek/memorandum) volledig?

Is the Assessment tool (rubric/memorandum) complete?

Is die Projek intern gemodereer?

Was the Project moderated internally?

BEWYS VAN LEERDERS SE PRESTASIE

EVIDENCE OF LEARNERS PERFORMANCE

Is 10% van die projekte gemodereer? / Have 10% of the projects been moderated?

Het die opvoeder volgens die memorandum of assesseringsinstrument geassesseer?

Did the educator assess according to the memorandum or assessment tool?

Is die finale uitslag ʼn ware weergawe van die standard van die leerder se werkverrigting? *

Does the final mark given to the learner reflect the standard of the learner’s actual work?

Is die punte korrek opgetel?

Were marks added correctly?

Is die punte (%) / kodes korrek opgeteken op die punteblad?

Was the marks (%) codes recorded correctly on mark sheet?

ALGEMENE KOMMENTAAR/GENERAL COMMENTS

Internal/interne Moderator: ______________ Signature/Handtekening: _______________ Date/Datum: ________

NAME OF CLUSTERMODERATOR:

SCHOOL:

NAAM VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: _____________________SKOOL: .______________________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER MODERATOR:

HANDTEKENING VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

CURRICULUM ADVISER / KURRIKULUM ADVISEUR: ……………………………………… Date/Datum______________

DEPUTY CHIEF EDUCATION SPECIALIST (Provincial Moderation) ……………………………. Date/Datum: ______________

ADJUNK HOOFONDERWYSKUNDIGE (Provinsiale Moderering)

JUNE EXAM: Grade 10/11/12

EXEMPLAR PAPER 1

JUNIE EKSAMEN: Graad 10/11/12

VOORBEELD VRAESTEL 1

JUNE EXAM

JUNIE EKSAMEN

Vraestel 1: Hoofonderwerpe

Paper 1: Main topics

Macro-Economics/Makro Ekonomie

Economic Pursuits/Ekonomiese Strewes

MARK ALLOCATION

PUNTETOEKENNING

Paper 1/Vraestel 1

TIME ALLOCATION

TYD TOEKENNING

P1/V1

P2/V2

DATE P1

DATUM Vr 2

LEARNER 1 EVIDENCE /LEERDER 1 BEWYSE

LEARNER 2 EVIDENCE / LEERDER 2 BEWYSE

Name of learner

Naam van leerder

From level 2 Moderation:

From level 2 Moderation:

Mark Allocated

Punt toegeken

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Gemiddelde punte

Average mark

Gemiddelde %

Average %

(√ or X)

Int

Dis

Prov

Comment/Opm

Is Vraestel 1 van ‘n opskrif voorsien/(naam van skool, vak, graad, datum)?

Is Question Paper 1 provided with a heading/(name of school, subject, grade, date)?

Bestaan die vraestel uit punte soos voorgeskryf? Gr 10 2 x 100 Gr11/12: 2 x 150

Is the mark allocation of the question paper as prescribed? Gr 10 2 x 100 Gr 11/12: 2 x 150

Is die tydstoekenning van die vraestelle korrek? (Gr 10 2 x 1½uur Gr 11/12: 2 x 2 uur)

Is the time allocated to the test correct? (Grade 10 2 x 1½hr Grade 11/12: 2 x 2 hr)

Is die Hoofonderwerpe op die vraestel aangebring? Vraestel 1: Makro-ekon 2: Mikro-ekonomie

Are the Main topics indicated on the test Question Paper? Paper 1: Macro econ 2: Micro Econ

Bestaan elde vraestel uit drie afdelings?

Does each paper consist of three sections?

Afdeling A / Section A (Is daar ‘n verskeidenheid vrae in afdeling A / Does section A include a variety of questions?)

Veelkeuse-items/Multiple Choice Questions Gr 11/12 (8x2) Gr 10: Jun (5x2)

Afparingsitems/Matching Items Gr 11/12 (8x1) Gr 10 Jun (6x1)

Explain Econ concept/Give one term Gr 11/12 (6x1) [30] Gr 10 Jun (4x1) [20]

Afdeling / Section B

Gr 11/12 DRIE keusevrae van 40 punte elk (leerders doen TWEE) / THREE choice questions of 40 marks each (learners do TWO)

Gr 10: TWEE keusevrae van 40 punte elk, leerders doen EEN / TWO choice questions of 40 marks each, learners do ONE

Afdeling B: Gee twee vrae/leerders doen een:

Noem (2x1) Verduidelik (2x1)Datarespons Vr1 (10) Datarespons Vr2 (10) Bespreek ens [Middelorde] (2x4) Bespreel ens [Middelorde] (2x4) [40]

Section B:Provide two questions – learners choose one:

Name (2x1) Explain (2x1)Data response Q1 (10) Data response Q2 (10) Explain etc (Middle order) (2x4) Discuss etc (Middle order) (2x4) [40] Gr 10 Jun [40] Gr 11/12 [80]

Afdeling / Section C

Grade 11/12: TWEE vrae, leerders doen EEN / TWO Essay questions, learners do ONE [80]

Graad 10: TWEE vrae, leerder doen EEN Grade 10: TWO questions, learners do ONE [40]

Sluit vrae hoër kognitiew vlakke volgens Bloom se taksonomie in? / Do questions include higher order levels of questioning according to Bloom?

Afdeling C:

Kan opsteltipe of Nie-opsteltipe wees bv. Verslag/Minuut / Memorandum / Formele brief

Bestaande uit: Inleiding 2 / Hoofvraag 26 / Addisionele vraag (Hoër Orde denke) 10 / Gevolgtrekking 2 [40]

Section C:

Can be Essay responses and Non-essay responses e.g. Report/ Minutes/ Memorandum/ Formal letter

Consisting of: Introduction 2 / Main question 26 / Additional question (HOT) 10 / Concl 2 [40]

Is die Assesseringsinstrument (memorandum) volledig?

Is the Assessment tool (memorandum) complete?

Is die Vraestel intern gemodereer?

Was the Question Paper moderated internally?

BEWYS VAN LEERDERS SE PRESTASIE

EVIDENCE OF LEARNERS PERFORMANCE

Is 10% van die skrifte gemodereer? / Have 10% of the scripts been moderated?

Het die opvoeder volgens die memorandum of assesseringsinstrument nagesien?

Did the educator mark according to the memorandum or assessment tool?

Is die punte korrek opgetel?

Were marks added correctly?

Is die punte (%) / kodes korrek opgeteken op die punteblad?

Was the marks (%) codes recorded correctly on mark sheet?

ALGEMENE KOMMENTAAR/GENERAL COMMENTS

Internal/interne Moderator: ______________ Signature/Handtekening: _______________ Date/Datum: ________

NAME OF CLUSTERMODERATOR:

SCHOOL:

NAAM VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: _____________________SKOOL: _____________________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER MODERATOR:

HANDTEKENING VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

CURRICULUM ADVISER / KURRIKULUM ADVISEUR: ……………………………………… Date/Datum______________

DEPUTY CHIEF EDUCATION SPECIALIST (Provincial Moderation) ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

ADJUNK HOOFONDERWYSKUNDIGE (Provinsiale Moderering)

JUNE EXAM: Grade 10/11/12

EXEMPLAR PAPER 2

JUNIE EKSAMEN

VOORBEELD VRAESTEL 2

JUNE EXAM

JUNIE EKSAMEN

Vraestel 2: Hoofonderwerpe

Paper 2: Main topics

Micro-Economics/Mikro Ekonomie

Current Economic Issues / Huidige Ekonomiese Aangeleenthede

MARK ALLOCATION

PUNTETOEKENNING

Paper 2/Vraestel 2

TIME ALLOCATION

TYD TOEKENNING

P1/V1

P2/V2

DATE P1

DATUM Vr 2

LEARNER 1 EVIDENCE /LEERDER 1 BEWYSE

LEARNER 2 EVIDENCE / LEERDER 2 BEWYSE

Name of learner

Naam van leerder

From level 2 Moderation:

From level 2 Moderation:

Mark Allocated

Punt toegeken

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Gemiddelde punte

Average mark

Gemiddelde %

Average %

(√ or X)

Int

Dis

Prov

Comment/Opm

Is Vraestel 2 van ‘n opskrif voorsien/(naam van skool, vak, graad, datum)?

Is Question Paper 2 provided with a heading/(name of school, subject, grade, date)?

Bestaan die vraestel uit punte soos voorgeskryf? Gr 10 2 x 100 Gr11/12: 2 x 150

Is the mark allocation of the question paper as prescribed? Gr 10 2 x 100 Gr 11/12: 2 x 150

Is die tydstoekenning van die vraestelle korrek? (Gr 10 2 x 1½uur Gr 11/12: 2 x 2 uur)

Is the time allocated to the test correct? (Grade 10 2 x 1½hr Grade 11/12: 2 x 2 hr)

Is die Hoofonderwerpe op die vraestel aangebring? Vraestel 1: Makro-ekon 2: Mikro-ekonomie

Are the Main topics indicated on the test Question Paper? Paper 1: Macro econ 2: Micro Econ

Bestaan elde vraestel uit drie afdelings?

Does each paper consist of three sections?

Afdeling A / Section A (Is daar ‘n verskeidenheid vrae in afdeling A / Does section A include a variety of questions?)

Veelkeuse-items/Multiple Choice Questions Gr 11/12 (8x2) Gr 10: Jun (5x2)

Afparingsitems/Matching Items Gr 11/12 (8x1) Gr 10 Jun (6x1)

Explain Econ concept/Give one term Gr 11/12 (6x1) [30] Gr 10 Jun (4x1) [20]

Afdeling / Section B

Gr 11/12 DRIE keusevrae van 40 punte elk (leerders doen 2) / THREE choice questions of 40 marks each (learners do TWO)

Gr 10: TWEE keusevrae van 40 punte elk, leerders doen EEN / TWO choice questions of 40 marks each, learners do ONE

Afdeling B: Gee twee vrae/leerders doen een:

Noem (2x1) Verduidelik (2x1)Datarespons Vr1 (10) Datarespons Vr2 (10) Bespreek ens [Middelorde] (2x4) Bespreel ens [Middelorde] (2x4) [40]

Section B:Provide two questions – learners choose one:

Name (2x1) Explain (2x1)Data response Q1 (10) Data response Q2 (10) Explain etc (Middle order) (2x4) Discuss etc (Middle order) (2x4) [40] Gr 10 Jun [40] Gr 11/12 [80]

Afdeling / Section C

Grade 11/12: TWEE vrae, leerders doen EEN / TWO Essay questions, learners do ONE [40]

Graad 10: TWEE vrae, leerder doen EEN Grade 10: TWO questions, learners do ONE [40]

Sluit vrae hoër kognitiew vlakke volgens Bloom se taksonomie in? / Do questions include higher order levels of questioning according to Bloom?

Afdeling C:

Kan opsteltipe of Nie-opsteltipe wees bv. Verslag/Minuut / Memorandum / Formele brief

Bestaande uit: Inleiding 2 / Hoofvraag 26 / Addisionele vraag (Hoër Orde denke) 10 / Gevolgtrekking 2 [40]

Section C:

Can be Essay responses and Non-essay responses e.g. Report/ Minutes/ Memorandum/ Formal letter

Consisting of: Introduction 2 / Main question 26 / Addtional question (HOT) 10 / Concl 2 [40]

Is die Assesseringsinstrument (memorandum) volledig?

Is the Assessment tool (memorandum) complete?

Is die Vraestel intern gemodereer?

Was the Question Paper moderated internally?

BEWYS VAN LEERDERS SE PRESTASIE

EVIDENCE OF LEARNERS PERFORMANCE

Is 10% van die skrifte gemodereer? / Have 10% of the scripts been moderated?

Het die opvoeder volgens die memorandum of assesseringsinstrument nagesien?

Did the educator mark according to the memorandum or assessment tool?

Is die punte korrek opgetel?

Were marks added correctly?

Is die punte (%) / kodes korrek opgeteken op die punteblad?

Was the marks (%) codes recorded correctly on mark sheet?

ALGEMENE KOMMENTAAR/GENERAL COMMENTS

Internal/interne Moderator: ______________ Signature/Handtekening: _______________ Date/Datum: ________

NAME OF CLUSTERMODERATOR:

SCHOOL:

NAAM VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: _____________________SKOOL: _____________________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER MODERATOR:

HANDTEKENING VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

CURRICULUM ADVISER / KURRIKULUM ADVISEUR: ……………………………………… Date/Datum______________

DEPUTY CHIEF EDUCATION SPECIALIST (Provincial Moderation) ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

ADJUNK HOOFONDERWYSKUNDIGE (Provinsiale Moderering)

CASE STUDY

EXEMPLAR TASK?

CASE STUDY

VOORBEELD TAAK?

CASE STUDY – Media research

GEVALLESTUDIE - MEDIA NAVORSING

Hoofonderwerpe

Main Topics

(Kan lys van sub-onderwerpe aanheg waaruit leerders kon kies) _Kw 1-3

(Can attach list of sub-topics provided to learners to choose from) Term 1-3

MARK ALLOCATION

PUNTETOEKENNING

TIME ALLOCATION

TYD TOEKENNING

DATE

DATUM

LEARNER 1 EVIDENCE 1/LEERDER 1 BEWYSE1

LEARNER 2 EVIDENCE/LEERDER 2 BEWYSE

Name of learner

Naam van leerder

From level 2 Moderation:

From level 2 Moderation:

Mark Allocated

Punt toegeken

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Gemiddelde punte

Average mark

Gemiddelde %

Average %

Does the inal mark given to the learner reflect the standard

f the learner’s actual work?

Is die punte korrek opgetel?

Were marks added correctly?

Is die punte (%) / kodes korrek opgeteken op die punteblad?

Was the marks (%) codes recorded correctly on mark sheet?

ALGEMENE KOMMENTAAR/GENERAL COMMENTS

Internal/Interne Moderator: ______________ Signature/Handtekening: _______________ Date/Datum: ________

NAME OF CLUSTERMODERATOR:

SCHOOL:

NAAM VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: _______________________SKOOL: _____________________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER MODERATOR:

HANDTEKENING VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

CURRICULUM ADVISER / KURRIKULUM ADVISEUR: ……………………………………… Date/Datum______________

DEPUTY CHIEF EDUCATION SPECIALIST (Provincial Moderation) ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

ADJUNK HOOFONDERWYSKUNDIGE (Provinsiale Moderering)

NAME OF SCHOOL

NAAM VAN SKOOL……………………………………………………………………………

CONTROL TEST 2

EXEMPLAR TASK?

KONTROLE TOETS 2

VOORBEELD TAAK?

CONTROL TEST 2

KONTROLE TOETS 2

Main topic(s) and Topics covered

Hoofonderwerp en Onderwerpe gedek

MARK ALLOCATION

PUNTETOEKENNING

TIME ALLOCATION

TYD TOEKENNING

DATE

DATUM

LEARNER 1 EVIDENCE /LEERDER 1 BEWYSE

LEARNER 2 EVIDENCE / LEERDER 2 BEWYSE

Name of learner

Naam van leerder

From level 2 Moderation:

From level 2 Moderation:

Mark Allocated

Punt toegeken

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Gemiddelde punte

Average mark

Gemiddelde %

Average %

(√ or X)

Int

Dis

Prov

Comments/Opmerking

Is die toets van ‘n opskrif voorsien/(naam van skool, vak, graad, datum, taak)?

Is the test provided with a heading/(name of school, subject, grade, date, task)?

Is die tydstoekenning van die toets korrek? (100 punte vir 1 uur) Afd A 20/B 40/C 40

Is the time allocated to the test correct? (100 marks for 1 hour) Section A 20/B 40/C40

Is die Hoofonderwerp/Sub Onderwerpe op die toets aangebring? Makro-ekonomie

Are the Main Topics and Sub-Topics indicated on the test? Macro Economics

Maak die vraestel voorsiening vir verskillende vlakke van vraagstelling? Bv.

Does the paper make provision for different levels of questioning? i.e.

Afdeling A: Veelvuldige keuse (5x2) Afpaar (6x1) Gee omskrywing van ekon terme / Gee een woord (4x1) [20]

Section A: Mult choice (5x2) Matching (6x1) Describe meaning of econ terms/Give one term: (4x1) (Lower order) [20]

Afdeling B: Gee twee vrae/leerders doen een:

Noem (2x1) Verduidelik (2x1)Datarespons 1 (10) Datarespons 2 (10) Bespreek ens Middelorde (2x4) Bespreel ens Middelorde (2x4) [40]

Section B:Provide two questions – learners choose one:

Name (2x1) Explain (2x1)Data response Q1 (10) Data response Q2 (10) Explain etc Middle order (2x4) Discuss etc Middle order (2x4) [40]

Afdeling C: Gee twee vrae – leerder doen een.

Kan opsteltipe of Nie-opsteltipe wees bv. Verslag/Minuut / Memorandum / Formele brief

Bestaande uit: Inleiding 2 Hoofvraag 26 Addisionele vraag (Hoër Orde denke) 10 Gevolgtrekking 2

[40]

Section C: Provide two questions – learner chooses one.

Can be Essay responses and Non-essay responses e.g. Report/ Minutes/ Memorandum/ Formal letter

Consisting of: Introduction 2 Main question 26 Addtional question (HOT) 10 Concl 2[40]

Is die Assesseringsinstrument (memorandum) volledig en korrek?

Is the Assessment tool (memorandum) complete and correct?

Is die Kontrole Toets intern gemodereer?

Was the Controlled test moderated internally?

BEWYS VAN LEERDERS SE PRESTASIE

EVIDENCE OF LEARNERS PERFORMANCE

Is 10% van die skrifte gemodereer? / Have 10% of the scripts been moderated?

Het die opvoeder volgens die memorandum of assesseringsinstrument nagesien?

Did the educator mark according to the memorandum or assessment tool?

Is die punte korrek opgetel?

Were marks added correctly?

Is die punte (%) / kodes korrek opgeteken op die punteblad?

Was the marks (%) codes recorded correctly on mark sheet?

ALGEMENE KOMMENTAAR/GENERAL COMMENTS

Internal/Interne Moderator: ______________ Signature/Handtekening: _______________ Date/Datum: ________

NAME OF CLUSTERMODERATOR:

SCHOOL:

NAAM VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: _____________________SKOOL: ______________________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER MODERATOR:

HANDTEKENING VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: ……………………………. Date/Datum: ______________

CURRICULUM ADVISER / KURRIKULUM ADVISEUR: ……………………………………… Date/Datum: ______________

DEPUTY CHIEF EDUCATION SPECIALIST (Provincial Moderation) ……………………………. Date/Datum: _______________

ADJUNK HOOFONDERWYSKUNDIGE (Provinsiale Moderering)

SLEGS GRAAD 12/ GRADE 12 ONLY:

PRELIMINARY EXAM

EXEMPLAR PAPER?

VOORBEREIDENDE EKSAMEN

VOORBEELD VRAESTEL?

TRIAL EXAM

PROEF EKSAMEN

Vraestel 1: Hoofonderwerpe

Paper 1: Main topics

Macro-Economics/Makro Ekonomie

Economic Pursuits/Ekonomiese Strewes

MARK ALLOCATION

PUNTETOEKENNING

Paper 1/Vraestel 1

TIME ALLOCATION

TYD TOEKENNING

P1/V1

DATE P1

DATUM Vr 2

LEARNER 1 EVIDENCE /LEERDER 1 BEWYSE

LEARNER 2 EVIDENCE / LEERDER 2 BEWYSE

Name of learner

Naam van leerder

From level 2 Moderation:

From level 2 Moderation:

Mark Allocated

Punt toegeken

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Gemiddelde punte

Average mark

Gemiddelde %

Average %

(√ or X)

Int

Dis

Prov

Comment/Opm

Is Vraestel 1 en 2 van ‘n opskrif voorsien/(naam van skool, vak, graad, datum)?

Is Question Paper 1 and 2 provided with a heading/(name of school, subject, grade, date)?

Bestaan die vraestel uit punte soos voorgeskryf? Gr 12: 2 x 150

Is the mark allocation of the question paper as prescribed? Gr 12: 2 x 150

Is die tydstoekenning van die vraestelle korrek? (Gr 12: 2 x 2 uur)

Is the time allocated to the test correct? (Grade 12: 2 x 2 hr)

Is die Hoofonderwerpe op die vraestel aangebring? Vraestel 1: Makro-ekon 2: Mikro-ekonomie

Are the Main topics indicated on the test Question Paper? Paper 1: Macro econ 2: Micro Econ

Bestaan elde vraestel uit drie afdelings?

Does each paper consist of three sections?

Afdeling A / Section A (Is daar ‘n verskeidenheid vrae in afdeling A / Does section A include a variety of questions?)

Veelkeuse-items/Multiple Choice Questions Gr 12 (8x2)

Afparingsitems/Matching Items Gr 12 (8x1)

Explain Econ concept/Give one term Gr 12 (6x1) [30]

Afdeling / Section B

Gr 12: DRIE keusevrae van 40 punte elk (leerders doen TWEE) / THREE choice questions of 40 marks each (learners do TWO)

Afdeling B:

Noem (2x1) Verduidelik (2x1) Datarespons Vr1 (10) Datarespons Vr2 (10) Bespreek ens [Middelorde] (2x4) Bespreel ens [Middelorde] (2x4) [40]

Section B:

Name (2x1) Explain (2x1)Data response Q1 (10) Data response Q2 (10) Explain etc (Middle order) (2x4) Discuss etc (Middle order) (2x4) [40] Gr 12 [80]

Afdeling / Section C

Grade 12: TWEE vrae, leerders doen EEN / TWO Essay questions, learners do ONE [40]

Sluit vrae hoër kognitiew vlakke volgens Bloom se taksonomie in? / Do questions include higher order levels of questioning according to Bloom?

Afdeling C:

Kan opsteltipe of Nie-opsteltipe wees bv. Verslag/Minuut / Memorandum / Formele brief

Bestaande uit: Inleiding 2 / Hoofvraag 26 / Addisionele vraag (Hoër Orde denke) 10 / Gevolgtrekking 2 [40]

Section C:

Can be Essay responses and Non-essay responses e.g. Report/ Minutes/ Memorandum/ Formal letter

Consisting of: Introduction 2 / Main question 26 / Addtional question (HOT) 10 / Concl 2 [40]

Is die Assesseringsinstrument (memorandum) volledig?

Is the Assessment tool (memorandum) complete?

Is die Vraestel intern gemodereer?

Was the Question Paper moderated internally?

BEWYS VAN LEERDERS SE PRESTASIE

EVIDENCE OF LEARNERS PERFORMANCE

Is 10% van die skrifte gemodereer? / Have 10% of the scripts been moderated?

Het die opvoeder volgens die memorandum of assesseringsinstrument nagesien?

Did the educator mark according to the memorandum or assessment tool?

Is die punte korrek opgetel?

Were marks added correctly?

Is die punte (%) / kodes korrek opgeteken op die punteblad?

Was the marks (%) codes recorded correctly on mark sheet?

ALGEMENE KOMMENTAAR/GENERAL COMMENTS

Internal/interne Moderator: ______________ Signature/Handtekening: _______________ Date/Datum: ________

NAME OF CLUSTERMODERATOR:

SCHOOL:

NAAM VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: _____________________SKOOL: _____________________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER MODERATOR:

HANDTEKENING VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

CURRICULUM ADVISER / KURRIKULUM ADVISEUR: ……………………………………… Date/Datum______________

DEPUTY CHIEF EDUCATION SPECIALIST (Provincial Moderation) ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

ADJUNK HOOFONDERWYSKUNDIGE (Provinsiale Moderering)

SLEGS GRAAD 12/ GRADE 12 ONLY:

PRELIMINARY EXAM

EXEMPLAR PAPER?

VOORBEREIDENDE EKSAMEN

VOORBEELD VRAESTEL?

TRIAL EXAM

PROEF EKSAMEN

Vraestel 2: Hoofonderwerpe

Paper 2: Main topics

Mikro-Ekonomie & Huidige Ekonomiese aangeleenthede

Micro Economics & Current Economic Issues

MARK ALLOCATION

PUNTETOEKENNING

Paper 2/Vraestel 2

TIME ALLOCATION

TYD TOEKENNING

P2/V2

DATE P1

DATUM Vr 2

LEARNER 1 EVIDENCE /LEERDER 1 BEWYSE

LEARNER 2 EVIDENCE / LEERDER 2 BEWYSE

Name of learner

Naam van leerder

From level 2 Moderation:

From level 2 Moderation:

Mark Allocated

Punt toegeken

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Gemiddelde punte

Average mark

Gemiddelde %

Average %

(√ or X)

Int

Dis

Prov

Comment/Opm

Is Vraestel 1 en 2 van ‘n opskrif voorsien/(naam van skool, vak, graad, datum)?

Is Question Paper 1 and 2 provided with a heading/(name of school, subject, grade, date)?

Bestaan die vraestel uit punte soos voorgeskryf? Gr 12: 2 x 150

Is the mark allocation of the question paper as prescribed? Gr 12: 2 x 150

Is die tydstoekenning van die vraestelle korrek? (Gr 12: 2 x 2 uur)

Is the time allocated to the test correct? (Grade 12: 2 x 2 hr)

Is die Hoofonderwerpe op die vraestel aangebring? Vraestel 2: Mikro-ekonomie

Are the Main topics indicated on the test Question Paper? Paper 2: Micro Econ

Bestaan elde vraestel uit drie afdelings?

Does each paper consist of three sections?

Afdeling A / Section A (Is daar ‘n verskeidenheid vrae in afdeling A / Does section A include a variety of questions?)

Veelkeuse-items/Multiple Choice Questions Gr 12 (8x2)

Afparingsitems/Matching Items Gr 12 (8x1)

Explain Econ concept/Give one term Gr 12 // Verduidelik term / Gee een term (6x1) [30]

Afdeling / Section B

Gr 12: DRIE keusevrae van 40 punte elk (leerders doen TWEE) / THREE choice questions of 40 marks each (learners do TWO)

Afdeling B:

Noem (2x1) Verduidelik (2x1) Datarespons Vr1 (10) Datarespons Vr2 (10) Bespreek ens [Middelorde] (2x4) Bespreel ens [Middelorde] (2x4) [40]

Section B:

Name (2x1) Explain (2x1)Data response Q1 (10) Data response Q2 (10) Explain etc (Middle order) (2x4) Discuss etc (Middle order) (2x4) [40] Gr 12 [80]

Afdeling / Section C

Grade 12: TWEE vrae, leerders doen EEN / TWO Essay questions, learners do ONE [40]

Sluit vrae hoër kognitiew vlakke volgens Bloom se taksonomie in? / Do questions include higher order levels of questioning according to Bloom?

Afdeling C:

Kan opsteltipe of Nie-opsteltipe wees bv. Verslag/Minuut / Memorandum / Formele brief

Bestaande uit: Inleiding 2 / Hoofvraag 26 / Addisionele vraag (Hoër Orde denke) 10 / Gevolgtrekking 2 [40]

Section C:

Can be Essay responses and Non-essay responses e.g. Report/ Minutes/ Memorandum/ Formal letter

Consisting of: Introduction 2 / Main question 26 / Addtional question (HOT) 10 / Concl 2 [40]

Is die Assesseringsinstrument (memorandum) volledig?

Is the Assessment tool (memorandum) complete?

Is die Vraestel intern gemodereer?

Was the Question Paper moderated internally?

BEWYS VAN LEERDERS SE PRESTASIE

EVIDENCE OF LEARNERS PERFORMANCE

Is 10% van die skrifte gemodereer? / Have 10% of the scripts been moderated?

Het die opvoeder volgens die memorandum of assesseringsinstrument nagesien?

Did the educator mark according to the memorandum or assessment tool?

Is die punte korrek opgetel?

Were marks added correctly?

Is die punte (%) / kodes korrek opgeteken op die punteblad?

Was the marks (%) codes recorded correctly on mark sheet?

ALGEMENE KOMMENTAAR/GENERAL COMMENTS

Internal/interne Moderator: ______________ Signature/Handtekening: _______________ Date/Datum: ________

NAME OF CLUSTERMODERATOR:

SCHOOL:

NAAM VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: _____________________SKOOL: _____________________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER MODERATOR:

HANDTEKENING VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

CURRICULUM ADVISER / KURRIKULUM ADVISEUR: ……………………………………… Date/Datum______________

DEPUTY CHIEF EDUCATION SPECIALIST (Provincial Moderation) ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

ADJUNK HOOFONDERWYSKUNDIGE (Provinsiale Moderering)

GRADE 10/11 ONLY / GRAAD 10/11 ALLEENLIK

YEAR END EXAM/JAAREIND

VOORBEELD VRAESTEL

EXEMPLAR PAPER

YEAR END EXAM

JAAREIND EKSAMEN

Vraestel 1: Hoofonderwerpe

Paper 1: Main topics

Macro-Economics/Makro Ekonomie

Economic Pursuits/Ekonomiese Strewes

MARK ALLOCATION

PUNTETOEKENNING

Paper 1/Vraestel 1

TIME ALLOCATION

TYD TOEKENNING

P1/V1

DATE P1

DATUM Vr 2

LEARNER 1 EVIDENCE /LEERDER 1 BEWYSE

LEARNER 2 EVIDENCE / LEERDER 2 BEWYSE

Name of learner

Naam van leerder

From level 2 Moderation:

From level 2 Moderation:

Mark Allocated

Punt toegeken

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Gemiddelde punte

Average mark

Gemiddelde %

Average %

(√ or X)

Int

Dis

Prov

Comment/Opm

Is Vraestel 1 en 2 van ‘n opskrif voorsien/(naam van skool, vak, graad, datum)?

Is Question Paper 1 and 2 provided with a heading/(name of school, subject, grade, date)?

Bestaan die vraestel uit punte soos voorgeskryf? Gr 10 /Gr11: 2 x 150

Is the mark allocation of the question paper as prescribed? Gr 10 /Gr 11: 2 x 150

Is die tydstoekenning van die vraestelle korrek? (Gr 10 /Gr 11: 2 x 2 uur)

Is the time allocated to the test correct? (Grade 10 / Grade 11: 2 x 2 hr)

Is die Hoofonderwerpe op die vraestel aangebring? Vraestel 1: Makro-ekon

Are the Main topics indicated on the test Question Paper? Paper 1: Macro econ

Bestaan elde vraestel uit drie afdelings?

Does each paper consist of three sections?

Afdeling A / Section A (Is daar ‘n verskeidenheid vrae in afdeling A / Does section A include a variety of questions?)

Veelkeuse-items/Multiple Choice Questions Gr 10/11 (8x2)

Afparingsitems/Matching Items Gr 10/11 (8x1)

Explain Econ concept/Give one term Gr 10/11 (6x1) [30]

Afdeling / Section B

Gr 10/11 DRIE keusevrae van 40 punte elk (leerders doen TWEE) / THREE choice questions of 40 marks each (learners do TWO)

Afdeling B: Gee twee vrae/leerders doen een:

Noem (2x1) Verduidelik (2x1)Datarespons Vr1 (10) Datarespons Vr2 (10) Bespreek ens [Middelorde] (2x4) Bespreel ens [Middelorde] (2x4) [40]

Section B:Provide two questions – learners choose one:

Name (2x1) Explain (2x1)Data response Q1 (10) Data response Q2 (10) Explain etc (Middle order) (2x4) Discuss etc (Middle order) (2x4) [40] Gr 10/11 [80]

Afdeling / Section C

Grade 10/11: TWEE vrae, leerders doen EEN / TWO Essay questions, learners do ONE [40]

Sluit vrae hoër kognitiew vlakke volgens Bloom se taksonomie in? / Do questions include higher order levels of questioning according to Bloom?

Afdeling C:

Kan opsteltipe of Nie-opsteltipe wees bv. Verslag/Minuut / Memorandum / Formele brief

Bestaande uit: Inleiding 2 / Hoofvraag 26 / Addisionele vraag (Hoër Orde denke) 10 / Gevolgtrekking 2 [40]

Section C:

Can be Essay responses and Non-essay responses e.g. Report/ Minutes/ Memorandum/ Formal letter

Consisting of: Introduction 2 / Main question 26 / Addtional question (HOT) 10 / Concl 2 [40]

Is die Assesseringsinstrument (memorandum) volledig?

Is the Assessment tool (memorandum) complete?

Is die Vraestel intern gemodereer?

Was the Question Paper moderated internally?

BEWYS VAN LEERDERS SE PRESTASIE

EVIDENCE OF LEARNERS PERFORMANCE

Is 10% van die skrifte gemodereer? / Have 10% of the scripts been moderated?

Het die opvoeder volgens die memorandum of assesseringsinstrument nagesien?

Did the educator mark according to the memorandum or assessment tool?

Is die punte korrek opgetel?

Were marks added correctly?

Is die punte (%) / kodes korrek opgeteken op die punteblad?

Was the marks (%) codes recorded correctly on mark sheet?

ALGEMENE KOMMENTAAR/GENERAL COMMENTS

Internal/interne Moderator: ______________ Signature/Handtekening: _______________ Date/Datum: ________

NAME OF CLUSTERMODERATOR:

SCHOOL:

NAAM VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: _____________________SKOOL: _____________________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER MODERATOR:

HANDTEKENING VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

CURRICULUM ADVISER / KURRIKULUM ADVISEUR: ……………………………………… Date/Datum______________

DEPUTY CHIEF EDUCATION SPECIALIST (Provincial Moderation) ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

ADJUNK HOOFONDERWYSKUNDIGE (Provinsiale Moderering)

GRADE 10/11 ONLY / GRAAD 10/11 ALLEENLIK

YEAR END EXAM/JAAREIND

EXEMPLAR PAPER

VOORBEELD VRAESTEL

YEAR END EXAM

JAAREIND EKSAMEN

Vraestel 2: Hoofonderwerpe

Paper 2: Main topics

Mikro-Ekonomie / Kontemporêre Ekonomiese Vraagstukke

Micro Economics / Current Economic Issues

MARK ALLOCATION

PUNTETOEKENNING

Paper 2/Vraestel 2

TIME ALLOCATION

TYD TOEKENNING

P2/V2

DATE P1

DATUM Vr 2

LEARNER 1 EVIDENCE /LEERDER 1 BEWYSE

LEARNER 2 EVIDENCE / LEERDER 2 BEWYSE

Name of learner

Naam van leerder

From level 2 Moderation:

From level 2 Moderation:

Mark Allocated

Punt toegeken

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Educator

Opvoeder

Moderator

Moderator

Gemiddelde punte

Average mark

Gemiddelde %

Average %

(√ or X)

Int

Dis

Prov

Comment/Opm

Is Vraestel 1 en 2 van ‘n opskrif voorsien/(naam van skool, vak, graad, datum)?

Is Question Paper 1 and 2 provided with a heading/(name of school, subject, grade, date)?

Bestaan die vraestel uit punte soos voorgeskryf? Gr 10 /Gr11: 2 x 150

Is the mark allocation of the question paper as prescribed? Gr 10 /Gr 11: 2 x 150

Is die tydstoekenning van die vraestelle korrek? (Gr 10 /Gr 11: 2 x 2 uur)

Is the time allocated to the test correct? (Grade 10 / Grade 11: 2 x 2 hr)

Is die Hoofonderwerpe op die vraestel aangebring? Vraestel 1: Mikro-ekon

Are the Main topics indicated on the test Question Paper? Paper 1: Micro econ

Bestaan elde vraestel uit drie afdelings?

Does each paper consist of three sections?

Afdeling A / Section A (Is daar ‘n verskeidenheid vrae in afdeling A / Does section A include a variety of questions?)

Veelkeuse-items/Multiple Choice Questions Gr 10/11 (8x2)

Afparingsitems/Matching Items Gr 10/11 (8x1)

Explain Econ concept/Give one term Gr 10/11 (6x1) [30]

Afdeling / Section B

Gr 10/11 DRIE keusevrae van 40 punte elk (leerders doen TWEE) / THREE choice questions of 40 marks each (learners do TWO)

Afdeling B: Gee twee vrae/leerders doen een:

Noem (2x1) Verduidelik (2x1)Datarespons Vr1 (10) Datarespons Vr2 (10) Bespreek ens [Middelorde] (2x4) Bespreel ens [Middelorde] (2x4) [40]

Section B:Provide two questions – learners choose one:

Name (2x1) Explain (2x1)Data response Q1 (10) Data response Q2 (10) Explain etc (Middle order) (2x4) Discuss etc (Middle order) (2x4) [40] Gr 10/11 [80]

Afdeling / Section C

Grade 10/11: TWEE vrae, leerders doen EEN / TWO Essay questions, learners do ONE [40]

Sluit vrae hoër kognitiew vlakke volgens Bloom se taksonomie in? / Do questions include higher order levels of questioning according to Bloom?

Afdeling C:

Kan opsteltipe of Nie-opsteltipe wees bv. Verslag/Minuut / Memorandum / Formele brief

Bestaande uit: Inleiding 2 / Hoofvraag 26 / Addisionele vraag (Hoër Orde denke) 10 / Gevolgtrekking 2 [40]

Section C:

Can be Essay responses and Non-essay responses e.g. Report/ Minutes/ Memorandum/ Formal letter

Consisting of: Introduction 2 / Main question 26 / Addtional question (HOT) 10 / Concl 2 [40]

Is die Assesseringsinstrument (memorandum) volledig?

Is the Assessment tool (memorandum) complete?

Is die Vraestel intern gemodereer?

Was the Question Paper moderated internally?

BEWYS VAN LEERDERS SE PRESTASIE

EVIDENCE OF LEARNERS PERFORMANCE

Is 10% van die skrifte gemodereer? / Have 10% of the scripts been moderated?

Het die opvoeder volgens die memorandum of assesseringsinstrument nagesien?

Did the educator mark according to the memorandum or assessment tool?

Is die punte korrek opgetel?

Were marks added correctly?

Is die punte (%) / kodes korrek opgeteken op die punteblad?

Was the marks (%) codes recorded correctly on mark sheet?

ALGEMENE KOMMENTAAR/GENERAL COMMENTS

Internal/interne Moderator: ______________ Signature/Handtekening: _______________ Date/Datum: ________

NAME OF CLUSTERMODERATOR:

SCHOOL:

NAAM VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: _____________________SKOOL: _____________________________

SIGNATURE OF CLUSTER MODERATOR:

HANDTEKENING VAN KLUSTERMODERATOR: ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

CURRICULUM ADVISER / KURRIKULUM ADVISEUR: ……………………………………… Date/Datum______________

DEPUTY CHIEF EDUCATION SPECIALIST (Provincial Moderation) ……………………………. Date/Datum: _____________

ADJUNK HOOFONDERWYSKUNDIGE (Provinsiale Moderering)

YES NO

JA NEE

YES NO

JA NEE

YES NO

JA NEE

YES NO

JA NEE

YES NO

JA NEE

YES NO

JA NEE

YES NO

JA NEE

YES NO

JA NEE

YES NO

JA NEE

YES NO

JA NEE

YES NO

JA NEE

2

PAGE

6