NECIPUJTENAS.CZ

Prestižní globální konference představila světové veřejnosti v Šanghaji v lednu 2015 mj. vážná rizikačipování lidí! – Známá čínská publicistka/spisovatelka jménem Soleilmavis Liu z městské prefektury „Jen-tchaj“(„Yantai“) přednesla 6. ledna 2015 v Šanghaji na konferenci „E-Leader“ příspěvek nazvaný „Technologieovládání mysli pomocí elektromagnetické frekvence“ („Mind Control Technology with ElectromagneticFrequency”), jehož tématikou byla mj. rizika čipování/monitorování/ovládání občanů našeho globálně sepropojujícího světa. Liu sdělila své poznatky veřejnosti v prostorách Fudanské University (jedna z nejstarších avýběrových místních vysokých škol) v rámci prestižní mezinárodní konference „E-Leader“ (5. až 7. ledna 2015),která je organizována již od roku 2006 v mnoha zemích světa pod záštitou a odborným dohledem „Čínsko-americké vědecké asociace“ („Chinese American Scholars Association“, „CASA“). – Nezisková organizace„CASA“ vznikla roku 1989 v USA. Své sídlo má ve městě Fort Lee (stát New Jersey). Jejími odborných členy jevíce než 200 významných osobnosti z více než čtyřiceti zemí světa včetně osmnácti vysokoškolských pedagogů avýzkumných pracovníků z České republiky (např. Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci; Masarykova universita vBrně; Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze aj.) – Každý text přednesený na výše uvedené konferenci procházíodborným posouzením. V případě uznání jeho přínosu je posléze publikován na oficiálním webu „CASA“ azařazen do fondů největší známé světové knihovny „Library of Congress“, tedy do národní knihovny USA, kteráslouží jako vědeckovýzkumné středisko Kongresu spojených států se sídlem ve Washingtonu, D. C. – Není jistěbez zajímavosti, že další „E-Leader“ má proběhnout 1. až 3. června 2015 v Praze. – Šanghajská prezentaceSoleilmavis Liu především varovala lidstvo na základě již zdokumentovaných kauz před státnímzneužíváním moderních technologií (aktuální v souvislosti se všeobecným strachem z terorismu,posilováním pravomocí tajných služeb, policie, armády a budováním tzv. „chytrých měst“, „Internetuvěcí“, „Internetu všeho“), různých typů vysílaných dálkových frekvenčních vlnění a mikro/nano čipůimplantovaných lidem nejen za účelem sledování občanů, nýbrž navíc k doslovné fyzické i mentálnímanipulaci/ovládání obyvatelstva. (Liu sama sebe pokládá za oběť takových praktik; o svých zkušenostechvydala knihu.) – Celý příspěvek je k dispozici níže v angličtině.

Zdroj: http://www.g-casa.com/conferences/shanghai/paper_pdf/Liu-mindcontrol.pdf; http://www.g-casa.com/conferences/shanghai/pdf%20ppt/Liu-Mind%20Control.pdf; http://cn.linkedin.com/in/soleilmavis; http://peacepink.ning.com/profile/1033oxmqvvrga; https://www.facebook.com/soleilmavis; https://twitter.com/soleilmavis; http://www.g-casa.com/E-Leader-shanghai_program.htm; http://www.g-casa.com/PaperDatabase.htm

Zdroj obrázku: „The CASA“, „Chinese American Scholars Association“, http://www.g-casa.com/conferences/shanghai/pdf%20ppt/Liu-Mind%20Control.pdf

E-Leader Shanghai 2015

Mind Control with Electromagnetic Frequency

Ms. Soleilmavis Liu Sponsor Activist of Peacepink Yantai, Shandong Province, China

Recent years, the words “mind control abuse and torture” and “target individual” appears frequently online.

Thousands of people in groups or individually cries attention to the abuses and tortures with electromagnetic mind control technologies through internet and all other channels. The scale of the ongoing crimes is large, and hidden. People are asking for the worldwide attention and an international investigation of enormous human rights violations that are silently taking place worldwide at this moment.

Abstract

One of the twenty-first century’s greatest violations of human rights is the proliferationof mind control technologies and their accompanying abuse and torture. Thousands of innocent victims across the globe have become activists for their freedom.

Electromagnetic mind control technologies are weapons which use electromagnetic waves

to hijacka person’s brain and nervous system and subvert an individual’s sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making. This article is a brief introduction to mind control technologies, the grave situation of hidden mind control abuses and tortures, and victims, includingSoleilmavis Liu, whose work is to expose mind control technologies and their torturous abuses, and to urge governments worldwide to investigate and halt these egregious violations of human rights.

Keywords: Mind control technology; voice-to-skull; victim, Human Rights; Torture; Abuse

Introduction

Thousands of people in groups or individually cries attention to the abuses and tortures with electromagnetic mind control technologies through internet and all other channels. The scale of the ongoing crimes is large, and hidden. People are asking for the worldwide attention and an international investigation of enormous human rights violations that are silently taking place worldwide at this moment.

This article will briefly introduce mind control technologies, current data of mind control

victims, Soleilmavis’ case summary, and their work to expose mind control abuse and torture. Soleilmavis’ case summary and her work will hopefully bring more public awareness to the secret crimes of mind control abuses and tortures.

Brief introduction of Mind Control technologies

Mind control technologies are weapons which use electronic microchip implants, nanotechnologies, microwaves and/or electromagnetic waves to subvert an individual’s sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making by attacking the brain and nervous system. The development of these methods and technologies has a long history.

E-Leader Shanghai 2015

1.Nazi Wonder Drug Nazi researchers used concentration camp inmates to test a cocaine-based “wonder drug”

they hoped would enhance the performance of German troops. Hamburg-based criminologistWolf Kemper believed that D-IX pills were Hitler’s last secret development. The so-called Experiment D-IX started in November of the year 1944 in Sachsenhausen concentration camp. The results of all those tests inspired their initiators to supply D-IX drug to the entire Nazi Army. However, they failed to launch the mass production of the substance. The allies’ victories at both fronts in winter and spring, in 1945, resulted in the collapse of the Nazi regime. The absurd dream of the wonder drug was crushed. [1]

According to the “Want to Know” information site, “After the end of World War II,

German scientists were being held in a variety of detainment camps by the allies. In 1946, President Truman authorized Project Paperclip to exploit German scientists for American research, and to deny these intellectual resources to the Soviet Union.” Some reports bluntly pointed out that they were “ardent Nazis.” They were considered so vital to the “Cold War” effort that they would be brought into the US and Canada. Some of these experts had participated in murderous medical experiments on human subjects at concentration camps. A 1999 report to the Senate and the House said “between 1945 and 1955; 765 scientists, engineers, and technicians were brought to the US under Paperclip and similar programs.” (Bluebird Report)

2. Mk-ultra, America’s Central Intelligence Agency mind control project. The Central Intelligence Agency’s Fact Book states the NSC (National Security Council)

and the CIA were established under the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947. In December 1947, the NSC held its first meeting. James Forrestal, the Secretary of Defense, pushed for the CIA to begin a “secret war” against the Soviets. Forrestal’s initiative led to the execution of psychological warfare operations (psy-ops) in Europe. CIA personnel were not opposed to working with Nazi doctors who had proven to be proficient in breaking the mind and rebuilding it. In some cases, military bases were used to hide these covert activities. It was decided that the communist threat was an issue that took priority over constitutional rights.

One of the areas to be investigated by the CIA was Mind Control. The CIA’s human

behavior control program was chiefly motivated by perceived Soviet, Chinese, and North Korean use of mind control techniques. Under the protection of “national security,” many other branches of the government also took part in the study of this area. The CIA originated its first program in 1950 under the name BLUEBIRD, which in 1951, after Canada and Britain had been included, was changed to ARTICHOKE. MKULTRA officially began in 1953. Technically it was closed in 1964, but some of its programs remained active under MKSEARCH well into the seventies. In 1973, tipped off about forthcoming investigations, CIA Director Richard Helms ordered the destruction of any MKULTRA records. (MC 10, 17)

There is an overwhelming body of evidence that confirms the existence of Mk-ultra. More

than 250 people who claim they were the “brainwashing” victims of America’s Central Intelligence Agency were set to win a multimillion dollar legal battle for compensation. Nine already had each received $67,000 (£33,500) compensation from the spy agency, which had

E-Leader Shanghai 2015

admitted setting-up an operation codenamed MK-Ultra during the Cold War. [Mike Parker, CIA’s Bourne Identity Plot (Mkultra), Express.co.uk, July 8, 2007] [2]

3. Implantable Electronic Chip Mind Control

Many researchers, using nanotechnologies had developed implantable electronic chips that established new nerve connections in parts of the brain that controlled movement or even altered emotion and thought. Researchers at the University of Washington (UW) had been working on an implantable electronic chip that might help establish new nerve connections in the part of the brain that controlled movement. Their study, to be published in the November 2, 2006, edition of Nature, showed such a device could induce brain changes in monkeys lasting more than a week (Leila Gray, Tiny Electronic Chip, Interacting with the Brain, Modifies Pathways for Controlling Movement, University of Washington News, October 24, 2006). [3]

On March 18, 2008, the Central Intelligence Agency responded in writing to a Larson

Media Freedom of Information Act request. The document disclosed that the CIA’s use of biomedical intellectual property developed at the Alfred Mann Foundation, Second Sight LLC, Advanced Bionics, and under Naval Space Warfare (SPAWAR) contract #N6600106C8005, was “currently and properly classified pursuant to an executive order in the interest of national security,” and applied to the CIA Director’s “statutory obligation to protect from disclosure, intelligence sources and methods.” The technology, developed under the DARPA programs of Tony Tether, Col. Geoffrey Ling and N.I.H programs of William Heetderks, had been protected as a Defense “Special Access Program1” (SAP), which was the official terminology for a “black project.” The research had resulted in implantable devices that were millimeter and sub-millimeter in size, could be surreptitiously implanted (and had been fabricated in a manner that the devices could not be detected or localized by clinical medical or radiology techniques), and provided a shocking amount of surveillance capability regarding a subject’s activities, which might include visual and auditory biofeedback data.

Additionally, the devices were capable of delivering testosterone or any other biological

agent. 4. Voice to Skull Technologies Artificial microwave voice-to-skull transmission was successfully demonstrated by

researcher Dr. Joseph Sharp in 1973, announced at a seminar at the University of Utah in 1974, and in the journal “American Psychologist” in the March 1975 issue, the article was titled “Microwaves and Behavior” by Dr. Don Justesen (1975). [4]

In 2002, the US Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a device: “a

nonlethal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device, which broadcast sound into the skull of persons or animals by way of pulse-modulated microwave radiation; and (2) a silent sound device, which can transmit ultrasound (above human hearing) into the skull of mammals.” NOTE: The sound modulation might be voice or audio subliminal messages. One application of voice-to-skull uses was an electronic scarecrow to frighten birds in the vicinity of airports. [5]

5. Mind Reading Technologies

E-Leader Shanghai 2015

A team of world-leading neuroscientists has developed a powerful technique that allowed them to look deep inside a person’s brain, and to read their intentions before they act.

The research broke controversial new ground in scientists’ ability to probe people’s minds

and eavesdrop on their thoughts, ethically to be condemned in its technology and applications. “Using the scanner, we could look around the brain for this information and read out

something that from the outside, there is no way you possibly could tell is in there. It is like shining a torch around, looking for writing on a wall,” said JohnDylan Haynes at the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in Germany in 2007, who led the study with colleagues at University College London and Oxford University.

In 2011, neuroscientists at the University of California Berkeley put electrodes inside the

skulls of brain surgery patients to monitor information from their temporal lobe, which was involved in the processing of speech and images. As the patient listened to someone speaking, a computer program analysed how the brain processed and reproduced the words they had heard.

The scientists believed the technique could also be used to read and report what they were

thinking of saying next. In the journal Plos Biology, they wrote that it took attempts at mind reading to “a whole

new level.” Harvard’s Buckner won the Alzheimer’s award for reading our minds in 2011. Researchers

had shown a capability to read a subject’s mind by remotely measuring their brain activity. This technique could even extract information from individuals, who were unaware of themselves. [6]

Those mind reading technologies use EEC with decoding of neurological signals remotely

with or without an implant through satellite or through TV Mobile transmission towers. The following data was from NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab, “The sensitivity of our deep-space tracking antennas located around the world is truly amazing. The antennas must capture Voyager information from a signal so weak that the power striking the antenna is only 10 exponent -16 watts (1 part in 10 quadrillion). A modern-day electronic digital watch operates at a power level 20 billion times greater than this feeble level.”

Scientists believed the weak radio emission of a cubic centimeter of brain matter was within

the detectable limits of the satellite. It was technically possible for a satellite to detect your thoughts, emotions and perceptions, and pass that information to a computer for interpretation. [7]

6.Patents of Mind Control Technologies Many patents had indicated the existence of mind control technologies, such as: USP # 6,729,337 (May 4, 2004), Sony owned a patent “Sony Brain Waves Manipulation By

Ultrasound” for an “ultrasound array” that supposedly stimulated your brain waves to simulate sensory experiences causing its users to experience smells, tastes and even touch without external stimuli.

E-Leader Shanghai 2015

USP # 6,488,617 (December 3, 2002), Nervous System Manipulation by EM Fields from Monitors.

7. More Evidence to Prove the Existence of Mind Control Technologies. There is sufficient evidence to prove the existence of mind control technologies. I will only

give a few as example. Microwave Irradiation of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow,review of its history and studies to

determine whether or not related health defects were experienced by employees assigned in the period, 1953-1977,prepared at the request of Howard W. Cannon, chairman, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States Senate, published in 1979 by U.S. Government Printing Office in Washington, disclose that since 1952, the Soviet government began directing microwave beams at the U.S. embassy in Moscow.

A study funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, has perfected the art of

using electrical signals to manipulate the color of a squid’s iridescent skin over the entire color spectrum. The Marine Biological Laboratory in Massachusetts carried out the research. [8] If they could manipulate animals, they could manipulate humans too.

A former KGB officer has divulged secrets of special mind control techniques that security

services in developed nations used during and after the Cold War, a Russian government daily said in December 2006.

General Boris Ratnikov, who served in the KGB department for Moscow and the Moscow

Region, told RossiiskayaGazeta that people in power had resorted to various methods of manipulating individuals’ thoughts since ancient times and that it was hardly surprising that secret services adopted the practice when it acquired a scientific foundation in the twentieth century.

In the mid-eighties, about fifty research institutes in the Soviet Union studied remote mind

control techniques backed by substantial government funding, but all such research efforts were halted with the demise of the Soviet empire in the early nineties.

Ratnikov, who subsequently served as deputy head and then senior consultant at the Federal

Guard Service from 1991 to 1997, said his department was in charge of safeguarding top officials in post-Soviet Russia against any external influence on their sub-conscious.

The general stated emphatically that he and his colleagues had never manipulated the minds

of the then president, Boris Yeltsin, or of economic reformer YegorGaidar, but claimed to have used mind-reading to save Russia’s first president and the country from a war with China.

Yeltsin had planned to visit Japan in 1992, but Ratnikov’s department detected attempts to

“program” the president’s mind, to make him give the Kuril Islands back to Japan. The move would have led to demands from China that it regains its disputed territories from Russia as well, a conflict that could have sparked a war between the neighbors. Yeltsin, therefore, had to cancel the trip.

E-Leader Shanghai 2015

Another of the general’s revelations is that senior officials in Western Europe and the

United States unwittingly provided information to his department, which was able to read their minds thanks to Soviet-era scientific achievements.

In the early nineties, Ratnikov and his colleagues “scanned” the mind of new U.S.

Ambassador Robert Strauss to see that the embassy building contained equipment to exert psychotronic influence on Moscow residents, but it had been deactivated, the general told the paper. [9]

Research into electromagnetic spectrums weapons had been secretly carried out in the US

and Russia since the fifties. Plans to introduce the super-weapons were announced quietly in March 2012 by Russian Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov, fulfilling a little-noticed election campaign pledge by president-elect Putin. Mr. Serdyukov said, “The development of weaponry based on new physics principles - Direct Energy weapons, Geophysical weapons, Wave-energy weapons, Genetic weapons, Psychotronic weapons, and so on - is part of the state arms procurement programme for 2011-2020.”[10]

There was no doubt that, notwithstanding that governments still covered-up the

development and research of mind control technologies, the government owned advanced technologies, which could read mankind thoughts remotely and subvert an individual’s sense of control over their own thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making by attacking the brain and nervous system with electromagnetic frequencies.

As early as 1998, scientists had warned that the control and manipulation of a human brain

was a terrifying possibility. Lieutenant Colonel Timothy L. Thomas, US Army (ret), published an article in the military journal Parameters which likened the mind to a new battlefield. He quoted a Russian army major in relation to weapons that affected the mind, “It is completely clear that the state, which is first to create such weapons, will achieve incomparable superiority.” Thomas expressed concern about “information dominance,” though he stopped short of the moral implications. (Timothy L. Thomas, The Mind Has No Firewall, Parameters, Spring 1998, pp. 84-92) [11]

Mr. Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton raised high concerns of human rights

violations implemented with electromagnetic spectrums weapons in the article “US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights.” (Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton, US

Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights, December 2006) [12] Carole Smith, a British psychoanalyst, in recent years has been openly critical of

government use of intrusive technology on non-consenting citizens, in the article “Diagnosis Psychosis in Light of Mind Invasive Technology - On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology.”

The European Parliament A4-0005/1999 Paragraph 27 called for a worldwide ban on

weapons that might enable “any form” of the “manipulation of human beings.” [13]

E-Leader Shanghai 2015

USA Representative Dennis Kucinich introduced bill H.R. 2977 (2001), which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

H.R. 2977 (2001) preserved the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all

humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and required the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.

In this bill, the terms “weapon” and “weapons system” included a device capable of the

following: “directing a source of energy, including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultralow frequency (ULF) energy radiation, against that object,” “through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations.”

The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) formally listed a special

category of psychotronic (psycho = “mind” &tronic= “electronic”) mind control and other electromagnetic resonance weapons in their 2002 Media Guide to Disarmament. [14] Reported Stories about People Who Claimed That They Were Mind Control Victims

There are many reported stories about people who have claimed that they were tortured and harassed by remote voice-to-skull and electromagnetic mind control technologies. Most of the public including media labeled them as conspiracy theorists, or mentally ill persons. Their stories were regarded as conspiracy work.

In the days and weeks before authorities say he shot three people at the Florida State

University library and was then gunned down by Tallahassee police, Myron May posted a video about mind control to Facebook, and earlier an image of a Google business card with the words “Targeted individual.” He also posted a video of former professional wrestler and Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura interviewing a man who claims to have created technology that allows the federal government to control people’s minds.

Jimmy Shao of Sacramento, California, was arrested for calling 911 more than one hundred

times in one month in May 2013. Shao said he would not stop until Congress investigates the shadow government who use satellites to control his mind and body.

Jared Loughner, 23, who accused of shooting a US congresswoman in Arizona and killing

six otherson January 8, 2011, claimed that he was being mind-controlled. Fayette woman Angela Modispaw claimed she heard voices telling her to kill her mother in 2009.

Another suspected victim, Honduras’ fallen leader told The Miami Herald, he was being

subjected to mind-altering gas and radiation - and that “Israeli mercenaries” are planning to assassinate him.

E-Leader Shanghai 2015

Ronald Morgan, 18, a teenage high school dropout who told investigators he was acting on

God’s orders confessed to beating his father to death with a baseball bat on May 27, 2001. Morgan said God had told him in a dream to kill his parents.Michael Robert Lawrence, accused of murdering a vacuum cleaner salesman in Waialua, said he was on a “mission” to kill people and chop up their bodies after voices commanded him to do so, a psychiatrist testified on April 3, 2001. T.J.

Richard Scott Baumhammers, 34, was arrested Friday, April 28, 2000, following a shooting

rampage that left five dead and one seriously injured in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania area. Baumhammers told a psychiatrist that he could hear people talking about him, and it interfered with his work.

Solomon, 15, allegedly opened fire on other students at Heritage High School on August 10,

1999. He heard voices telling him to do strange things, but they were robotic voices, not human voices.

Tami Stainfield is a woman with evidence that proves she and others are victims of

predictive analytics robotics and human logistics. She claimed that“we are tortured, hostages, and slaves to a network of technology void from identification and protection.”She had filed as a “no party” candidate in 2012 for the Presidency of the United States.

On February 28, 2011, many mind control victimsprovided statements to Presidential

Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues on a meeting in Washington, DC. These were only a very few reported stories of all the victims all over the world. More

victims’ stories had been ignored by the media and the public. Current Data about Mind Control Victims

Since 2006, many people who claimed to be mind control victims started connecting through internet, and worked together to write countless letters to government departments, social communities, human rights organizations, the media and the general public. Some victims organized some demonstrations in their countries and filed their lawsuits. Some victims organized meetings to meet together to discuss how to fight well. Some victims placed advertisements in major newspapers. Victims also launched worldwide conference calls.

Mind Control abuse and torture is becoming a larger issue worldwide. USA, Europe, and

China are the worst-hit areas. At least more than 2,000 victims in each of these areas have complained about being attacked by voice-to-skull and electromagnetic mind control technologies. There are also many victims in other countries, such as Russia, more than 200, India, more than 100, Japan, more than 100.

According to an anonymous survey (result on December 19, 2009)for 296 mind control

victimsall over the world, including 130 females and 166 males, 71.29% of all victims had completed a college degree, with 13.86% of all victims attaining a Master or a Doctor degree. [15]

E-Leader Shanghai 2015

Their Ages were:10-20: 13 (4.39%); 21-30: 64 (21.62%); 31-40: 87 (29.39%); 41-50: 70 (23.65%); 51-60:

42 (14.19%); 61-70: 15 (5.07%); above 70: 5 (1.69%). Year Torture Began: 1970-1980: 29 (9.80%); 1981-1990: 40 (13.51%); 1991-1995: 34 (11.49%); 1996:

18 (6.08%); 1997: 5 (1.69%); 1998: 11 (3.72%); 1999: 6 (2.03%); 2000: 16 (5.41%); 2001: 17 (5.74%); 2002: 15 (5.07%); 2003: 12 (4.05%); 2004: 21 (7.09%); 2005: 15 (5.07%); 2006: 17 (5.74%); 2007: 11 (3.72%); 2008: 23 (7.77%).

Ages when they were aware of being a target: 10-20: 69 (23.31%); 21-30: 92 (31.08%); 31-40: 49

(16.55%); 41-50: 59 (19.93%); 51-60: 21 (7.09%); 61-70: 5 (1.69%); above 70: 1 (0.34%). The possible reasons victims believed they became a target were:

(1) Government Secret Human Experiments or Scientists Performing Secret Human Experiments supported by Government (58.11%);

(2) Scientists Performing Secret Human Experiment (36.82%); (3) Government Secret War (33.45%); (4) Secret Political persecution (32.77%); (5) Terrorist violence (22.97%); (6) Misuse of weapons by government corruption (45.27%). The symptoms victims experienced as a possible result of this technology:

(1) Hot and Cold Flashes 148 50.00% (2) Nausea 151 51.01% (3) Severe sweating 119 40.20% (4) Induced Sleep 193 65.20% (5) Sleep deprivation 233 78.72% (6) Extreme Fatigue 203 68.58% (7) Blurred Vision 170 57.43% (8) Sensations of pain in internal organs 183 61.82% (9) Sensations of pain in backbone, arms, legs, and muscles 174 58.78% (10) Numbness and tingling, Paresthesias, Loss of sensation 144 48.65% (11) Muscle Cramps /Spasms/tension 167 56.42% (12) Sudden Headaches 189 63.85% (13) Irregular Heartbeat 180 60.81% (14) False Heart Attacks 115 38.85% (15) Tooth Pain 149 50.34% (16) Diarrhea. 131 44.26% (17) Acute inflammation/autoimmunity reactions 75 25.34% (18) Autoimmune disorders like Fibromyalgia 50 16.89% (19) Urinary tract infections 53 17.91% (20) Skin problems and skin irritations 149 50.34% (21) Change in growing of hair and nails 95 32.09% (22) Female problems which eventually lead to hysterectomy 24 8.11% (23) Cancer 13 4.39% (24) Fevers 68 22.97% (25) Flulike Symptoms /Sneezing 126 42.57% (26) Dizziness or Loss of Balance 164 55.41% (27) Sudden loss of consciousness 91 30.74% (28) Benign or Malignant Tumors 24 8.11% (29) Sensation of Electric Current Running through the Body 161 54.39% (30) Induced Thoughts/ telepathic communication, messages 191 64.53% (31) Hearing “voices” (reception of auditory acoustic weapon transmissions or similar) 201 67.91% (32) Seeing "Holograms" 124 41.89%

E-Leader Shanghai 2015

(33) Dream Manipulation 211 71.28% (34) Artificial Emotions (induced fear, anger, shame, joy, hate, sadness) 201 67.91% (35) Sudden “unexpected" Sexual Arousal 159 53.72% (36) Genital manipulation 163 55.07% (37) Induced Smells 154 52.03% (38) Sudden extreme moodswings (depression - euphoria) 142 47.97% (39) Induced pleasure-aversion reactions towards people or objects 133 44.93% (40) Making you say things (forced speech) 135 45.61% (41) General behaviour control in some situations 147 49.66% (42) Manipulation of Memory (forgetting/remembering/screen memories) 199 67.23% (43) Remote steering of eye movements 114 38.51% (44) Remote steering of body movements/motor control 126 42.57% (45) Virtual reality experiences while awake 104 35.14% 50.34% of all victims have been forced to accept psychiatric treatment, the length of being

forced to accept psychiatric treatment were: (1) 1-3 months 66 22.30% (2) 4-6 months 12 4.05% (3) 7-12 months 4 1.35% (4) 1 year 10 3.38% (5) 2-3 years 17 5.74% (6) 4-5 years 11 3.72% (7) 6-8 years 9 3.04% (8) 9-10 years 1 0.34% (9) above 10 years 20 6.76% All victims claimed that the psychiatric treatment did not have any therapeutic effect.

Soleilmavis’ Case Summary of Mind Control Abuse and Torture

Soleilmavis is a Chinese citizen, born and raised in China, who was first attacked in December, 2001 when she was studying for a Master’s Degree in Australia. At the time she was unfamiliar with remote electromagnetic weapons which can control thinking, behavior, emotions or decision making by attacking the brain and nervous system. Eventually, she would come to learn of these technologies that are being secretly used or covered by governments worldwide to control and harass the populace.

Noticeable effects started with some noises (whispering voices) which she heard from the

floor below her or from the neighbors’ houses. The other people who lived in the same house could not hear them. Soon she started to experience a wide variety of symptoms.

Majority of the symptoms were: pain all over the body, stomach pain, toothaches,

headaches, involuntary hand tremors, inability to stand firmly on her legs, alternation of cold and hot sensations, excessive perspiration,high fevers, constipation, faece and piss incontinence,sexual harassment, sleep deprivation, dream manipulation, artificial emotions (induced fear, anger, shame, joy, hate, sadness), andmanipulation of memory (forgetting/remembering/screen memories). Torturers also can make her say things (forced speech).All those symptoms would disappear without any medical treatment, or sometimes, a pain would persist, even if she had strong medication.

E-Leader Shanghai 2015

She was like a little trapped marionette being controlled by invisible strings. Some unknown people held the strings and controlled her actions: speaking, walking, eating, sleeping, and even her thoughts and emotions.

On April 5, 2002, she left Australia, and went to Hong Kong, Thailand, Shanghai and New

Zealand, but could not escape the harassment and torture. When she was in Hong Kong, her brain was controlled by voice-to-skull and remote electromagnetic mind control technologies, and she was taken into the US Embassy in HongKong. It was strange that there were so many Security Guards outside the US Embassy, but nobody stopped her or asked her anything.

During the past years, Soleilmavis worked hard to expose mind control technologies and

their torturous abuses, and urge governments worldwide to investigate and halt these egregious violations of human rights. She wrote her book “Twelve Years in the Grave - Mind Control with Electromagnetic Spectrums, the Invisible Modern Concentration Camp” to let the public know details of her story.She and other victims in her network have started a concerted campaign against secret mind control weapons abuse and torture. They are demanding an international investigation into these crimes which constitute immense violations of the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

With the fact that her brain was remotely controlled by voice-to-skull and electromagnetic

mind control technologies, and she was taken into the US Embassy in Hong Kong, she urges the US government to investigate her case, requires the cooperation and collaboration from Australia and China governments, and ask the support from the United Nations and other governments in investigating her case. She wishes the public help her to urge governments to take immediate actions.

Conclusion

It can be seen that mind control weapons are well developed and they are being used secretly to torture and harass innocent citizens. Many victims are currently working in conjunction with Soleilmavis to start a worldwide campaign against secret mind control weapons abuse and torture.

In this research, the following conclusions were reached: 1) Many countries have developed various types of mind control methods: drugs,

microchips, nanotechnologies and electromagnetic waves. Could these governments also introduce legislation to regulate the use of such weapons?

2) Effective laws and other measures from our governments need to be enacted to prevent the misuse of such weapons.

3) In the event of misuse of such weapons, government intervention is required to protect the victims’ and prosecute torturers to the fullest extent of the law.

It is hoped that this paper will bring about public awareness and solutions to mind control

weapons abuse and torture.

References [1] Nazi Wonder Drug, http://www.amphetamines.com/nazidrug.html, 9/11/2002, accessed August 19, 2013 [2] Mike Parker , CIA'S BOURNE IDENTITY PLOT (Mkultra), Express.co.uk, July 8, 2007,

E-Leader Shanghai 2015

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/12781/CIA accessed August 19, 2013 [3] Leila Gray,Tiny electronic chip, interacting with the brain, modifies pathways for controlling movement, University of Washington News, October 24, 2006 http://www.washington.edu/news/archive/27624 accessed August 19, 2013 [4] Dr. Don Justesen,Microwaves and Behavior, American Psychologist, March 1975, http://www.randomcollection.info/ampsychv2s.pdf accessed August 19, 2013 [5] Voice-to-skulldeviceshttp://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/dod/vts.html accessed August 19, 2013 [6] Harvard’s Buckner wins Alzheimer’s award for reading our minds, February 24, 2011, http://blogs.wickedlocal.com/goodage/2011/02/24/harvards-buckner-wins-alzheimers-award-for-reading-our-minds/#axzz1U2ENzowU accessed August 19, 2013 [7] Can A Satellite Read Your Thoughts http://peacepink.ning.com/forum/topics/satellite-surveillance accessed August 19, 2013 [8] T. J. Wardill, P. T. Gonzalez-Bellido, R. J. Crook, R. T. Hanlon. Neural control of tuneable skin iridescence in squid. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012; DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1374 [9] Ex-agent reveals KGB Mind Control techniques – paper 22/12/2006 http://www.en.rian.ru/russia/20061222/57596889.html accessed August 19, 2013 [10] ChristopherLeake and Will Stewart,Putin targets foes with 'zombie' gun which attack victims' central nervous system Could be used against Russia's enemies and perhaps its own dissidents, March 31, 2012 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2123415/Putin-targets-foes-zombie-gun-attack-victims-central-nervous-system.html accessed August 19, 2013 [11] Timothy L. Thomas, The Mind Has No Firewall, Parameters, Spring 1998, pp. 84-92. [12] Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton, US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights, December 2006, http://www.earthpulse.com/epulseuploads/articles/MindControlHumanRights.pdf?/ accessed August 19, 2013 [13] Environment, security and foreign affairs, A4-0005/1999, The European Parliament http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN#Contentd14937e476 accessed August 19, 2013 [14] 2002 Media Guide to Disarmament in Geneva, A Joint Initiative of: Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies, IUHEI http://www.unidir.ch/pdf/activites/pdf2-act201.pdf accessed August 19, 2013 [15] An anonymous Survey for Mind Control Victims (result on 19 Dec 2009) http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Peacepink/message/2569

Mind Control with Electromagnetic Frequency

Soleilmavis Liu

• Brief introduction of mind control technologies

• Reported stories about people who claimed that they were mind control victimsthat they were mind control victims

• Current data about mind control victims• Soleilmavis’ Case summary of Mind Control

abuse and torture

Brief introduction of mind control technologies• Nazi Wonder Drug• Mk-ultra, America’s Central Intelligence

Agency mind control project.Agency mind control project.• Implantable electronic chip mind control• Voice to Skull Technologies• Mind reading technologies • Patents of Mind Control Technologies• More evidence to prove the existence of mind

control technologies.

Nazi Wonder Drug• “Wonder drug” D-IX - cocaine-based drug, experiment in Sachsenhausen

concentration camp in 1944.

• Project Paperclip Program, authorized by President Truman in 1946, to

exploit German scientists for American research.exploit German scientists for American research.

• 1999 report to the Senate and the House, “between 1945 and 1955, 765 German scientists, engineers, and technicians were brought to the US under Paperclip and similar programs (Bluebird Report).”

Mk-ultra, America’s Central Intelligence Agency mind control project.

• BLUEBIRD in 1950 • BLUEBIRD in 1950 • ARTICHOKE in 1951 with Canada and Britain included• MKULTRA in 1953, technically was closed in 1964.• MKSEARCH remained active well into the seventies. • MK-Ultra “brainwashing” victims won compensation from CIA, nine

already had each received $67,000 (£33,500) compensation from the spy agency.

Implantable electronic chip mind control

• Implantable electronic chip, researched at the University of Washington (UW), helped establish new nerve connections in the part of the brain that controlled movement. movement.

• Implantable devices, CIA’s use of biomedical intellectual property, that were millimeter and sub-millimeter in size, developed at the Alfred Mann Foundation, Second Sight LLC, Advanced Bionics, and under Naval Space Warfare (SPAWAR) contract #N6600106C8005, under the DARPA programs of Tony Tether, Col. Geoffrey Ling and N.I.H programs of William Heetderks, could be surreptitiously implanted (and had been fabricated in a manner that the devices could not be detected or localized by clinical medical or radiology techniques), and provided a shocking amount of surveillance capability regarding a subject’s activities, which might include visual and auditory biofeedback data.

Voice to Skull Technologies• Artificial microwave voice-to-skull transmission was successfully

demonstrated by researcher Dr. Joseph Sharp in 1973, announced at a seminar at the University of Utah in 1974, and in the journal “American Psychologist” in the March 1975 issue, the article was titled “Microwaves and Behavior” by Dr. Don Justesen (1975). Justesen (1975).

• In 2002, the US Air Force Research Laboratory patented precisely such a device: “a nonlethal weapon which includes (1) a neuro-electromagnetic device, which broadcast sound into the skull of persons or animals by way of pulse-modulated microwave radiation; and (2) a silent sound device, which can transmit ultrasound (above human hearing) into the skull of mammals.” NOTE: The sound modulation might be voice or audio subliminal messages. One application of voice-to-skull uses was an electronic scarecrow to frighten birds in the vicinity of airports.

Mind reading technologies• John Dylan Haynes of the Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences in

Germany in 2007, could look deep inside a person’s brain, and to read their intentions before they act.

• In 2011, neuroscientists at the University of California Berkeley put electrodes inside the skulls of brain surgery patients to monitor information from their temporal lobe, which was involved in the brain surgery patients to monitor information from their temporal lobe, which was involved in the processing of speech and images. As the patient listened to someone speaking, a computer program analyzed how the brain processed and reproduced the words they had heard.

• Harvard’s Buckner won the Alzheimer’s award for reading our minds in 2011 by remotely measuring brain activity.

• NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab, “The sensitivity of our deep-space tracking antennas located around the world is truly amazing. The antennas must capture Voyager information from a signal so weak that the power striking the antenna is only 10 exponent -16 watts.

• Scientists believed the weak radio emission of a cubic centimeter of brain matter was within the detectable limits of the satellite. It was technically possible for a satellite to detect your thoughts, emotions and perceptions, and pass that information to a computer for interpretation.

Patents of Mind Control Technologies

• USP # 6,729,337 (May 4, 2004), “Sony Brain Waves Manipulation By Ultrasound,” an “ultrasound array” that supposedly Manipulation By Ultrasound,” an “ultrasound array” that supposedly stimulated your brain waves to simulate sensory experiences causing its users to experience smells, tastes and even touch without external stimuli.

• USP # 6,488,617 (December 3, 2002), Nervous System Manipulation by EM Fields from Monitors.

More evidence to prove the existence of mind control technologies

• Microwave Irradiation of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow disclosed that since 1952, the Soviet government began directing microwave beams at the U.S. embassy in Moscow.

• The Marine Biological Laboratory in Massachusetts carried out the research that using electrical signals to manipulate the color of a squid’s iridescent skin over the entire color spectrum.

• General Boris Ratnikov , former KGB officer, told Rossiiskaya Gazeta that in the mid-eighties, about fifty research institutes in the Soviet Union studied remote mind control techniques backed by substantial government funding, but all such research efforts were halted with the demise of the Soviet empire in the early nineties.

• Japan attempted to “program” President Yeltsin’s mind, to make him give the Kuril Islands back to Japan in 1992, • Japan attempted to “program” President Yeltsin’s mind, to make him give the Kuril Islands back to Japan in 1992, Ratnikov said.

• USA embassy building in Moscow contained equipment to exert psychotronic influence on local residents in early nineties.

• Mr. Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton raised high concerns of human rights violations implemented with electromagnetic spectrums weapons in the article “US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human Rights.”

• Carole Smith , a British psychoanalyst, in recent years has been openly critical of government use of intrusive technology on non-consenting citizens, in the article “Diagnosis Psychosis in Light of Mind Invasive Technology - On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology.”

• The European Parliament A4-0005/1999 Paragraph 27 called for a worldwide ban on weapons that might enable “any form” of the “manipulation of human beings.”

• USA Representative Dennis Kucinich and bill H.R. 29 77 (2001) called to ban mind control weapons.• The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Resear ch (UNIDIR) formally listed a special category of

psychotronic mind control and other electromagnetic resonance weapons in their 2002 Media Guide to Disarmament.

Reported stories about people who claimed that they were mind control victims

• Myron May of Tallahassee• Jimmy Shao of Sacramento, California• Jared Loughner• Angela Modispaw• Honduras’ fallen leader• Honduras’ fallen leader• Ronald Morgan• Michael Robert Lawrence• Richard Scott Baumhammers• Solomon• Tami Stainfield• In 2011, many mind control victims provided statements to Presidential Commission for the

Study of Bioethical Issues in Washington, DC. But they did not receive any positive reply from the government.

An anonymous survey for 296 mind control victims all over the world

4.39

21.6214.19

5.07 1.69

Victims Ages

10-20

21-3021.62

29.39

23.65

14.19

31-40

41-50

51-60

61-70

above 70

Year Torture Began

9.8

13.515.07

5.74

3.727.77

Year Tortue Began

1970-1980

1981-1990

1991-1995

1996

11.49

6.08

1.693.722.035.41

5.74

5.07

4.05

7.09

5.07 1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Ages when they were aware of being a target

23.31

19.93

7.09

1.69 0.34

10-20

21-30

31-40

31.0816.55

31-40

41-50

51-60

61-70

above 70

The Length Of Being Forced To Accept Psychiatric Treatment Were

3.72

50.34% of all victims have been forced to accept

psychiatric treatment. All victims claimed that the

psychiatric treatment did not have any therapeutic

effect.

1-3months

22.3

4.05

1.35

3.39

5.74

1-3months

4-6months

7-12months

1yrs

2-3yrs

4-5yrs

The possible reasons victims believed they became a target were:

• (1) Government Secret Human Experiments or Scientists Performing Secret • (1) Government Secret Human Experiments or Scientists Performing Secret Human Experiments supported by Government (58.11%);

• (2) Scientists Performing Secret Human Experiment (36.82%);• (3) Government Secret War (33.45%);• (4) Secret Political persecution (32.77%);• (5) Terrorist violence (22.97%);• (6) Misuse of weapons by government corruption (45.27%).

The symptoms victims experienced as a possible resu lt of electromagnetic mind control technology

• (1) Hot and Cold Flashes 50.00% (2) Nausea 51.01% (3) Severe sweating 40.20%

• (4) Induced Sleep 65.20% (5) Sleep deprivation 78.72% (6) Extreme Fatigue 68.58%

• (7) Blurred Vision 57.43% (8) Sensations of pain in internal organs 61.82%

• (9) Sensations of pain in backbone, arms, legs, and muscles 58.78%

• (10) Numbness and tingling, Paresthesias, Loss of sensation 48.65%

• (11) Muscle Cramps /Spasms/tension 56.42% (12) Sudden Headaches 63.85%

• (13) Irregular Heartbeat 60.81% (14) False Heart Attacks 38.85% (15) Tooth Pain 50.34%

• (16) Diarrhea. 44.26% (17) Acute inflammation/autoimmunity reactions 25.34%

• (18) Autoimmune disorders like Fibromyalgia 16.89% (19) Urinary tract infections 17.91%

• (20) Skin problems and skin irritations 50.34% (21) Change in growing of hair and nails 32.09%

• (22) Female problems which eventually lead to hysterectomy 8.11%

• (23) Cancer 4.39% (24) Fevers 22.97% (25) Flulike Symptoms /Sneezing 42.57% • (23) Cancer 4.39% (24) Fevers 22.97% (25) Flulike Symptoms /Sneezing 42.57%

• (26) Dizziness or Loss of Balance 55.41% (27) Sudden loss of consciousness 30.74%

• (28) Benign or Malignant Tumors 8.11% (29) Sensation of Electric Current Running through the Body 54.39%

• (30) Induced Thoughts/ telepathic communication, messages 64.53%

• (31) Hearing “voices” (reception of auditory acoustic weapon transmissions or similar) 67.91%

• (32) Seeing "Holograms" 41.89% (33) Dream Manipulation 71.28%

• (34) Artificial Emotions (induced fear, anger, shame, joy, hate, sadness) 67.91%

• (35) Sudden “unexpected" Sexual Arousal 53.72% (36) Genital manipulation 55.07%

• (37) Induced Smells 52.03% (38) Sudden extreme moodswings (depression - euphoria) 47.97%

• (39) Induced pleasure-aversion reactions towards people or objects 44.93%

• (40) Making you say things (forced speech) 45.61% (41) General behaviour control in some situations 49.66%

• (42) Manipulation of Memory (forgetting/remembering/screen memories) 67.23%

• (43) Remote steering of eye movements 38.51% (44) Remote steering of body movements/motor control 42.57%

• (45) Virtual reality experiences while awake 35.14%

Soleilmavis’ Case Summary Of Mind Control Abuse And Torture

• Toture Began: in December, 2001, when she was studying for a Master’s Degree in Australia.

• Duration of the suffering : from December 2001 to today.

• Fact and Evidence : Her brain was controlled by voice-to-skull and remote electromagnetic mind control • Fact and Evidence : technologies, and she was taken into the US Embassy in Hong Kong in April 2002.

• Her work of fighting against the crime: Sponsor and Activist at Worldwide campaign against secret mind control weapons abuse and torture since 2006. http://peacepink.ning.com

• Her Book : "Twelve Years in the Grave - Mind Control with Electromagnetic Spectrums, the Invisible Modern

Concentration Camp"• She urges the US government to investigate her case with the fact of being taken into the US

Embassy in Hong Kong, requires the cooperation and collaboration from Australia and China governments, and asks the support from the United Nations and other governments in investigating her case.

• She wishes the public help her to rise public awareness and urge governments to take immediate actions to investigate her case.

Conclusions• In this research, the following conclusions were re ached:• 1) Many countries have developed various types of mind control methods: drugs, microchips,

nanotechnologies and electromagnetic waves. Could these governments also introduce legislation to regulate the use of such weapons?

• 2) Effective laws and other measures from our governments need to be enacted to prevent the • 2) Effective laws and other measures from our governments need to be enacted to prevent the misuse of such weapons.

• 3) In the event of misuse of such weapons, government intervention is required to protect the victims’ and prosecute torturers to the fullest extent of the law.

• It is hoped that this paper will bring about public awareness and solutions to mind control weapons abuse and torture.