劉常勇 ph.d. auburn university cm.nsysu.tw/~cyliu

305

Click here to load reader

Upload: ailani

Post on 08-Jan-2016

108 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

DESCRIPTION

劉常勇 Ph.D. Auburn University http://cm.nsysu.edu.tw/~cyliu. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1984-198919901991-19941993-199619962002~2004~2005~2006.8~2007.7

    Ph.D. Auburn University http://cm.nsysu.edu.tw/~cyliu

  • PC ABC

  • 30% 30% () 40%

  • 2002

    Jeffry A. Timmons and Stephen Sppinelli, McGraw Hill, 2004Dollinger, M.J. () 2006Jeffry A. Timmons and Stephen Spinelli, New Venture Creation, 7th edition, McGraw Hill, 2006

  • 1970s --- 30 years1990s --- 15 -- 20 years2000s --- 10 -- 15 years 510 years ????

  • 70%40

  • It was the new and growing smaller firms that created 81.5% of the net new jobs in the economy from 1969-1976.Since 1980, America has created over 34 million new jobs but the Fortune 500 lost over 5 million jobs.

  • The poor are moving on up and getting richer faster

    Percent in Each Quintile in 1991

    Income Quintile in 1975

    1st

    2nd

    3rd

    4th

    5th

    5th (hightest)

    0.9

    2.8

    10.2

    23.6

    62.5

    4th

    1.9

    9.3

    18.8

    32.6

    37.4

    3rd (middle)

    3.3

    19.3

    28.3

    30.1

    19.0

    2nd

    4.2

    23.5

    20.3

    25.2

    26.8

    1st (lowest)

    5.1

    14.6

    21.0

    30.3

    29.0

  • The Poor Are Getting Richer Faster* Figures are in 1993 dollars

    Income Quintile in 1975Average Income in 1975 *Average Income in 1991 *Absolute Gain5th (highest)$45,704$49,678$3,9744th22,42331,2928,8693nd (highest)13,03022,3049,2742nd6,29128,37322,0821st (lowest)1,15326,47525,322

  • Six Largest Economies 20052050123456unit1000 billions USDUS

    Japan

    German

    China

    Britain

    France

    China44.45US35.17India27.8Japan6.67Brazil6.07Russia5.87

  • This pictures shows american cities at night.

  • GRADUTE GLUT(30% unemployment in 2004)02 03 04 054

    3

    2

    1

    0MILLIONSSTUDENTS GRADUATING FROM CHINESE UNIVERSITIESData: Education Ministry (china).

  • 200641014

  • NATIONAL ENTREPRENERUSHIP RESEARCH CENTER

  • ---- 1605024412%30%

  • Time for New Technologies to Reach 25% of the U.S. Population

    Household electricity (1873)46 yearsTelephone (1875)35 yearsAutomobile (1885)55 yearsAirplane travel (1903)54 yearsRadio (1906)22 yearsTelevision (1925)26 yearsVideocassette recorder (1952)34 yearsPersonal computer (1975)15 yearsCellular phone198513 yearsInternet19957 years

  • What is New Venture Creation ?

  • ActionManagement TeamworkRadical innovationNew venture creationEntrepreneurship

  • = +New Venture Creation = Innovation + Entrepreneurship

  • = Innovation = Invention + Commercialization

  • () / /

  • Thomas Alva Edison (Innovator)1000

  • What is Entrepreneurship?

  • Entrepreneurship is the creation and/or recognition of opportunities, followed by the will and initiative to seize these opportunities. It requires a willingness to take risks -- both personal and financial -- but in a very calculated fashion in order to constantly shift the odds to your favor, balancing the risk with the potential rewards. Typically, entrepreneurs devise business operations to marshal their limited resources to generate profit for employees, shareholders, and himself .

  • ()

  • Theory does matter

  • Information model of scienceS1T1S2T2Circumstance-based Theory in Social Science

  • (Intellectual Capability)

  • Cisco 1984 1984 1987 1988 1990 IPO1990 1995 1995 2000 2001 --

  • Bill YeagerMulti-ProtocolCisco

  • (scientists)(engineers), entrepreneurial businessperson

  • Xerography Chester F. CarlsonEngineer and Inventor 1935 19381939-1944Russell Dayton CEO of Battelee Memorial InstituteIncubator and product development) 1944--1947Joseph Wilson CEO of Haloid Company Commercialization, funding, and entrepreneurial businessperson) 1947 ---The Xerox Model 914 Copier (in 1958)

  • ActionManagement TeamworkEntrepreneur

  • Cisco

  • Angel Fund Winning Angels by Stevenson & Amis, 2001

  • niche marketmass marketoperation efficiency

  • ActionManagement TeamworkSustaining innovationEntrepreneur

  • AC 1 2BD

  • 20011Lucent, Gateway CiscoDellCiscoCisco202000

  • ActionManagement TeamworkSustaining or disruptive innovationBusiness Model InnovationEntrepreneur

  • Centocor Centocor197919971999Johnson & Johnson4520 CentocorJ.P. Schoemaker18

  • Entrepreneurship = ParadoxesAn opportunity with no or very low potential can be an enormously big opportunity.To make money you have to first lose money.To create and build wealth one must relinquish wealthTo succeed, one first has to experience failureEntrepreneurship requires considerable thought, preparation, and planning, yet is basically an unplannable event.For creativity and innovativeness to prosper, rigor and discipline must accompany the process.

  • Think Big or Think Small ???

  • Think Big or Think SmallPro Think Big

  • Survival Rates by Firm Size

  • Think Big or Think SmallPro Think SmallThink Big Think Big

  • Age of starting new venturesNFIB,1997,USAAge of entrepreneurUnder 25 11.0%25-29 16.7%30-39 33.2%40-49 25.1%50-59 9.8%Over 60 4%

    (The secret of US economic success has been and continues to be its innovative and entrepreneurial culture.)

  • Howard SchultzCEO of Starbucks Coffee

  • Question 1?

  • 937 56

    Chart4

    00.026

    0.230.63

    0.340.064

    0.410.235

    0.020.039

    Sheet1

    0.410.59

    0.230.44

    3.

    0.000.230.340.410.02

    0.030.630.060.240.04

    7.0.160.15

    8.0.460.14

    Sheet1

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

    7.

    8.

  • 2007

    2006

    2005

    2004

    2003

    2002

    2001

    20004.753.663.553.683.333.853.933.45()()4.544.503.823.374.084.452.993.44

  • 70%86%MBAMicrosoft, Netscape, Dell, Apple, Nike, DEC, Gateway 2000, Federal Express, Lotus, .., all start new ventures in their 20s.

  • (.)

  • 2008/3 51

  • 2008/3 51

  • 2008/3 51

  • 2008/3 32

  • 2008/3 32

  • 2008/3 32

  • 2008/3 32

  • 2

    Entrepreneurial FinanceEntrepreneurial Management, Entrepreneurial Marketing50001. 2. Professional Services, Running and Growing the Small Company1. 2. 3. Entrepreneurship, Creativity, and Organization, 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Venture Capital and Private Equity1519805019992000Starting New Ventures,

  • .

  • Question 2?

  • Question 3?

  • less averse to risk

  • risk aversionSome economists have suggested that less risk averse individuals become entrepreneurs (Kihlstrom and Laffont, 1979)less risk averse individuals

  • risk neutral

  • The cholesterol drug project

  • Valuation method

    NVP(million)

    1993

    1994

    1995

    Method A: DCF using most likely scenario

    -$11.4

    Method B: DCF with only market uncertainties included

    -$9.0

    Method C: DCF when both market and technological uncertainties included

    -5.4

    -6

    Method D: Options

    +$2.2

    _1132749613.unknown

    _1132749699.unknown

    _1141116584.unknown

    _1141116882.unknown

    _1132749812.unknown

    _1132749659.unknown

    _1132749577.unknown

    _1132749599.unknown

    _1132749531.unknown

  • (Timmons)

  • Some Basic ConceptsIn the past, entrepreneurs started business. Today they create opportunities and invent new business models. That is a big difference!There is shortage of quality entrepreneurs and opportunities, not money.In the world today, there is plenty of technology, plenty of money. Whats in short supply is great teams. Your biggest challenge will be building a great team. Rounding out the model of the three driving forces (opportunity, resources, team) is the concept of fit and balance.

  • NANOWIN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

  • 200568

  • 20075

  • 200340002004DEJ1200300020057

  • IndividualsResources & Capabilities.

    EnvironmentOrganization

    New Venture Creation

  • --- PROFIT PhysicalReputationOrganizationFinancialIntellectual & humanTechnology

  • 2485C

  • 85C85C15002555013118701351803506505%30%1.332006200

  • 85C24

  • by

  • (Entrepreneurs)Propensity(Motivation)(Entrepreneurship)(Capabilities)(Opportunities)(Resources)(Teamwork)(Business Model)(Networks)(Environment )(Execution)

  • $100 USD

  • MIT

  • 1963-2005AMJ

    Ireland, Reutzel and Webb2005Academy of Management Journal (AMJ)Entrepreneurship Research in AMJ: What has been published, and what might the future hold?AMJ

    cyliu

    Chart2

    3

    2

    1.5

    3

    4

    12

    25

    Sheet1

    1963-693

    1970-752

    1976-811.5

    1982-873

    1988-934

    1994-9912

    2000-pressent25

    Sheet1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • (1) (Busenitz et al., 2003; Shane & Venkataraman, 2000)

    (Venkataraman , 1997; Shane & Venkataraman, 2000) Busenitz et al., (2003)Ucbasaran, Westhead & Wright (2001)

  • (2)Busenitz et al., (2003)

    Gartner (1985) (process)

  • 20

  • Q&ADiscussion

  • It requires a willingness to take risks -- both personal and financial -- but in a very calculated fashion in order to constantly shift the odds to your favor, balancing the risk with the potential rewards. Typically, entrepreneurs devise ingenious strategies to marshal their limited resources.

  • Timmons

    _1054938772.vsd

  • ()

  • ()

  • 20304050

  • FedEx (Fred Smith)Nike (Bowerman and Knight)DELL (Micheal Dell)

  • 1940J.C. Penny751945 --- Ben Franklin1962Wal-Mart810123Wal-MartWe sell for less.

  • Overall Startup Failure Rates* Startups are defined as firms that are one year old or less.

    Startups* Tracked IndustryStartups 1998 Q1Survivors 2002 Q2Survival (percent)Failure (percent)Total for industries565,812303,51753.6%46.4%Agriculture15,5649,23959.440.6Finance14,8998,00353.746.3Manufacturing32,23618,92158.741.3Real estate16,22910,26163.236.8Retail142,50472,51250.949.1Wholesale37,30719,17151.448.6Technology28,57513,15946.153.9Computer Hardware48522145.654.4Computer Software/Services18,7338,38744.855.2

  • 2831978~20052904774251373910.919.4108.313

  • 19771983199019984420012006

  • 1995199812300200032200200020012

  • MBA

  • 1995519986199811

  • 199561997112.11998623%1.5199941999520004

  • Why?

  • ..

  • =

  • 69%40%

  • 19701991200035%200119.95%5%

  • Creativity and InnovationGeneral business skills, business know-how, and networkLowHighHighLowInventorEntrepreneurManager, Administratorclerk

  • Q&ADiscussion

  • 0 10 20 30 40

  • Guess which schedule belongs to Jack ?9:00 Internal Meeting 10:00 Internal Meeting 11:00 Internal Meeting 12:00 Lunch2:00 Internal Meeting 4:00 Internal Meeting

    9:00 Customer Meeting 10:00 Customer Meeting 11:00 Customer Meeting 12:00 Lunch with Customer2:00 Customer Meeting 4:00 Customer Meeting

  • WTOIC3C

  • Schumpeter personal traits[1] [1] Schumpeter, J.A. 1934, The Theory of Economic Development, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

  • Kirzner1979

  • Entrepreneurial Mindset and Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification

  • Ideas groupPotential OpportunityIdentify OpportunityMotivationOpportunity RecognitionOpportunity IdentificationSocial NetworkPrior KnowledgePersonal Trait

  • Action = desire (motivation oriented)+ believe (knowledge oriented)

  • RiskOpportunityOpportunity imbedded in risk and uncertainty

  • ?? NB????Web2.0

  • , , , , (Value Network), , , , , ,

  • Quick ScreenThe ability to quickly and efficiently reject ideas is a very important entrepreneurial skill.1. Market and Margin Related Issues2. Competitive Advantages3. Value Creation and Realization Issues4. Overall Potential

  • overall potential

  • Timmons Four Anchors Assessment CriteriaAdd significant value to customerMeeting a significant want or need for which someone is willing to pay a premium.Having robust market, margin, and moneymaking characteristics.Good fit with founder and management team and with risk/reward balance.

  • //

  • /

  • SW.

  • WHY?

  • Discounted Cash Flow Incremental Innovation(Option)

  • 1* *

  • 2007 13.3 0.22

  • OEM/ODM

  • $20,000$6,000$1,500IEK/MIC

  • On Sales: 3500 USDSales Price: 10000 USD

  • Low-end Disruptive Customer NeedDisruptive innovationSustaining innovationLow-end disruptionOver Supply

  • , , 199720061400

    1200

    1000

    800

    600

    400

    200

    0

  • 2006 --- Person of the Year

  • 2007

  • Q&ADiscussion

  • 10483.3%

  • (teamwork)(founder)

  • 12870

  • (1)(2)(3)(4)groupthinkgroupshift

  • groupthinkgroupshift

  • core ideologyenvisioned future (core value)(core purpose)

  • vs.

  • 85%(15%)15%

  • Q&ADiscussion

  • ABC

    CMOSIC---144176pixelICIC2.2

  • (1)20%(2)5%(3)15%(4)50%(5)10%30%20%ABCF30%ABCABCABC

  • 1.CMOSASIC CMOS2.Realtime CODEC3.Intelligent Image Sensor

  • ABC6.630% 2 A 2.210% 1B 2.210% 1 4.420% 2 2.210% 1 20%

  • (1) ;(2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

  • ABC () ABC CMOSCCD3CCMOS CMOSVVL30CMOS 20% ABCABCF

  • ABC ()ABC CCD(Pixel)CCDCCDCCDIntelMMXCCDCMOSABCCMOSCCDCMOS(0.15-.028m)2000CMOSCCDCMOS144176(pixel)30CMOSABC30%

  • business modelABCABCABC

  • CMOSCCDSGeoffrey Moore2.2

  • Sheet: Chart1

    Sheet: Sheet1

    Sheet: Sheet2

    Sheet: Sheet3

    Sheet: Sheet4

    Sheet: Sheet5

    Sheet: Sheet6

    Sheet: Sheet7

    Sheet: Sheet8

    Sheet: Sheet9

    Sheet: Sheet10

    Sheet: Sheet11

    Sheet: Sheet12

    Sheet: Sheet13

    Sheet: Sheet14

    Sheet: Sheet15

    Sheet: Sheet16

    1995

    1995

    1995

    1995

    NKK 2000

    NKK 2000

    NKK 2000

    NKK 2000

    2000

    2000

    2000

    2000

    2000

    2000

    2000

    2000

    2000

    2000

    2000

    2000

    24000.0

    4000.0

    8000.0

    4000.0

    15000.0

    6900.0

    6000.0

    2100.0

    6959.999999999999

    6959.999999999999

    5040.0

    5040.0

    12400.0

    2800.0000000000005

    3000.0

    1800.0

    13000.0

    2000.0

    2000.0

    3000.0

    1995

    24000.0

    4000.0

    8000.0

    4000.0

    40000.0

    NKK 2000

    15000.0

    6900.0

    6000.0

    2100.0

    30000.0

    2000

    6959.999999999999

    6959.999999999999

    5040.0

    5040.0

    24000.0

    2000

    12400.0

    2800.0000000000005

    3000.0

    1800.0

    20000.0

    2000

    13000.0

    2000.0

    2000.0

    3000.0

    20000.0

  • Hitting the Wall of Diminishing Profit ActionWorkHardContinuous ImprovementHitting the Wall of Diminishing Profit

  • Driving Investment

    (Enabling Investment ) (Emergent Investment) (Passive Investment )

  • 0 -- 5% > 15 %

    0 -- 5%

    > 15 %

    6.9% 12.3%

    25.8%

    9.5%

  • 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

  • 37%28%
  • 13%28%75%41%4%

  • AT&T1984AT&TAT&T74NCRAT&T199650AT&T19941996400

  • 1234

  • 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

  • /

  • 1.CMOSASIC CMOS2.Realtime CODEC3.Intelligent Image Sensor

  • Deliberated planning vs. Discovery-driven planning(Deliberated planning )(Discovery-driven planning)

  • Some dangerous implicit Assumptions in new venture creation1. Customers will buy our product because we think it is a good product.2. Customers will buy our product because it is technically superior.3. Customers run no risk in buying from us instead of continuing to buy from their past suppliers.4. The product will sell itself.5. Distributors are desperate to stock and service the product.6. We can develop the product on time and on budget.7. We will have not trouble attracting the right staff.8. Customers will agree with our perception that the product is great.9. Competitors will respond rationally.10. We can insulate our product from competition.11. We will be able to hold down prices while gaining share rapidly.12. The rest of our company will gladly support our strategy and provide help as needed.

  • (1) ;(2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

  • t 2 ()XYZt 3 ()t 1 (1)T121121

  • The cholesterol drug project

    191950~19601970~198019801990