이야기 능력과 이야기 능력 발달에 관한 국내외 연구...

28
이야기 능력과 이야기 능력 발달에 관한 국내외 연구 동향 211 이야기 능력과 이야기 능력 발달에 관한 국내외 연구 동향 * - - 화법교육의 관점에서 - 10)11) ** < 次 例 > . 서론 . 연구 논리 . 기술적 접근 . 규범적 접근 . 치료적 접근 . 결론 . 서론 모더니즘, 합리주의, 이성(理性), 논리, 구조 등의 용어가 힘주어 강조되던 20세기 초중반은 로고스(logos)의 시대였다. 교육과정을 구안할 때에도 학문의 구조에 부합하는 지식(혹은 명제)의 구조를 견고히 구축한 후, 이를 나선형 교육과정으로 구현함으로써 촘촘한 이성적 사고의 씨앗을 학습자에게 심어주고자 하였다. 글을 쓸 때에 도 삼단논법에 따른 합리적인 글쓰기가 강조되었고, 화법을 가르치 * 이 논문은 2014학년도 공주교육대학교 교내연구비 지원에 의한 것임. ** 공주교육대학교 초등국어교육과 교수 http://dx.doi.org/10.17313/jkorle.2015..36.211

Upload: doanduong

Post on 30-Mar-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 211

    *-

    - -

    10)11)

    **

    < >

    . . . . . .

    .

    , , (), ,

    20 (logos) .

    ( )

    ,

    .

    ,

    * 2014 . **

    http://dx.doi.org/10.17313/jkorle.2015..36.211

  • 212 36

    . 1990 2000 ()

    .

    ,

    .

    (), ()

    , ( ), ()

    21 , , ,

    , (mythos)

    .

    J. Bruner. 1960 (The Process of Education) Bruner (1983, 1990, 1996, 2002)

    . Bruner

    . ,

    .

    Bruner ,

    , ( ), ,

    , ,

    .1)

    1) ()

    .

  • 213

    .

    ()

    .

    ,

    . Bruner

    (1983) .

    .

    ,

    .

    , ,

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    1.

    , .

  • 214 36

    (

    ) .

    . (1992: 162)

    ,2)

    .

    ( ) ,

    ( )

    , (event) ,

    , ,

    .

    (),

    (), ()

    .3)

    , , , ,

    (family resemblance) .

    ,

    . (2012: 1)

    .

    2) (2003: 212) . (narrator),

    (narratee) .

    ,

    . 3) (2012) .

    ( ) ,

    .

  • 215

    ,

    . .

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    , (, ,

    ) . ,

    .

    , ,

    .

    , ,

    , ,

    .4)

    ,

    .

    .

    4) ,

    ,

    . .

  • 216 36

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    2.

    ,

    .

    , ,

    . ,

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    1) ,

    2) , 3)

    . ,

    . ,

  • 217

    ,

    .

    , , ,

    .

    ,

    .

    .5)

    .

    1. :

    (descriptive approach) 20 Propp(1928),

    Barlett(1932)6) , ()

    . Propp(1928)

    115 , , , ,

    , , , ,

    .

    5)

    () . . 6) (2013: 5) Barlett(1932)

    .

  • 218 36

    . Propp(1928) ,

    .7)

    Propp(1928) F. Saussure (1916) , Levi- Strauss R.

    Jakobson V. Mathesius

    (1926). Propp ()

    , .

    (,

    ) .

    2. :

    Propp(1928) 1958, 1968

    .

    , Propp(1928) 1970, 80

    . Mandler & Jonhson(1977), Rumelhart(1977),

    Stein & Glenn(1979), Stein & Trabasso(1981)

    ,

    .

    ( )

    . , ,

    7)

    . (2005), (2007), (2007) .

  • 219

    , , ,

    ,

    .

    .

    ( )

    . 1990 2000

    .

    ,

    ,

    . (2002),

    (2003), (2013)

    . ,

    ,

    .

    1970, 80

    .8)

    3 :

    8) . , , ,

    . .

  • 220 36

    . 2013

    , (2007), (2010),

    (2012) .

    ( ,

    , , )

    .

    ,

    ,

    .

    , ,

    .

    ,

    .

    , , ( )

    .

    ,

    . 500

    700 ,

    .

    ,

    .

  • 221

    .

    1. :

    (prescriptive approach) 1990

    () ,

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    .

    .

    (2004: 143) .

    ,

    , , ()

    .

  • 222 36

    ,

    .

    .

    .

    2. :

    (,

    ) . ,

    ., .

    (, ) .

    ,

    (, )

    .

    .

    ,

    ( ) ,

    .

    .

    (1992), (2001), (2003), (2006)

    (46)

    .

    . ,

  • 223

    .

    Frog, where are you? .

    , Stein & Glenn(1979) The Tiger's

    Whisker, Norbury & Bishop(2012) Beach story

    . ,

    . Applebee(1978), Stein &

    Glenn(1979), Morrow(1990) .9)

    (MLC

    -w) (MLC-m) .10)

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    . (2004), (2006)

    (13) ,

    .

    (2006) 20 13 60 20

    .

    (, ) (

    , ) ,

    9)

    (2005) . 10)

    ( ) C-unit

    .

    . (2006) .

  • 224 36

    .

    3. :

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    ,

    . (2012: 194)

    ( )

    ( ),

    ( ), (

    )

    , .

    , (, )

    . ,

    .

  • 225

    ,

    .

    .

    (2004, 2005) ,

    .

    . (2007)

    ,

    . (2013)

    1) , 2) , 3)

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    . (2013: 198)

    .

  • 226 36

    .

    .

    , (2009, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014)

    . , (), ,

    ,

    .

    .

    1. :

    (therapeutic approach)11) 1990

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    ,

    .

    .

    , ()

    11) .

    . .

  • 227

    .

    ,

    .

    C. Rogers .12) Rogers 20

    , ,

    .

    Rogers (non-directive) , ,

    , Rogers

    .

    Rogers

    . Rogers

    .

    2. :

    ( )

    20 C.G. Jung

    .13) (

    ) ,

    .

    12) Rogers Rogers(1980), Thorne(2003) . 13) (1998), (2005) .

  • 228 36

    .

    ,

    . ()

    , ( )

    .

    .

    White & Epston(1990), Winslade & Monk

    (1999) , .

    .

    (2004), (2007) ,

    . 21

    ,

    . (2011: 129) ,

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

  • 229

    .14)

    .

    ,

    ,

    .

    3. :

    . 2007

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    , ()

    14) Salmon(2008), (2012) .

  • 230 36

    .

    , ,

    .

    10 10

    . 10

    , . , ,

    ,

    .

    , , ()

    .

    .

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    . ,

    .

    ,

    ,

  • 231

    .

    .

    , ,

    . ,

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    .

    ,

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    , ()

    .

  • 232 36

    ,

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    ,

    .

    . ()

    ,

    .

    .*15)

    (2003), :

    , .

    (2004), , . (2012), ,

    44, , pp.5-35.

    * 2015. 11. 20. , 2015. 11. 26. 2015. 12. 4.

    , 2015. 12. 13. .

  • 233

    (2006), (story generation)

    , 15-3, , pp.115-126.

    (2006), ,

    .

    (2003), :

    , 80, , pp.211-237.(2004), :

    , 45, , pp.1-32.(2005), ,

    47, , pp.1-40.(2007), , . (2001), :

    , 21-2, , pp.111-131.

    (2007), , 122, , pp.353-383.

    (2013), , .

    (2012), : , .

    (2007), , . (2005), : , .(2005), , . (2002), , .

    (2013), 12 :

    , 23, , pp.121-138.

    (2006), , 15-1, , pp.71-85.

  • 234 36

    (2006), ,

    .

    (2010), , 133, , pp.145-181.

    (2004), , ,

    13, , pp.129-169.(2009), 1 ,

    41, , pp.133-180.(2011), 2 ,

    45, , pp.119-151.(2012), 3 ,

    48, , pp.183-209.(2013), 4 ,

    31, , pp.107-140. (2014), 5 ,

    33, , pp.167-204. (2004),

    , .

    (1998), , . (1992), ,

    12, , pp.31-51.(2003), , 5,

    , pp.337-369.

    (1998), , 122, , pp.399-419.

    (2007), , 24, , pp.217-263.

    (2007),

    , 16-4, , pp.223-233.

  • 235

    (2007), , .

    (2012), ,

    .

    (2011), , : , .

    (2003), , 12, , pp.207-248.

    (2007), , . Applebee, A.N.(1978), The Child's Concept of Story, Chicago, IL : University of

    Chicago Press.

    Becker, T. & U.M. Quasthoff(2004), Different dimensions in the field of narrative

    interaction. In Quasthoff, U.M. & Tabea Becker(eds.), Narrative Interact

    ion, Philadelphia; John Benjamins Publishing Co., pp.1-14.

    Becker, T.(2004), The role of narrative interaction in narrative development. In

    Quasthoff, U.M. & Tabea Becker(eds.), Narrative Interaction, Philadelphi

    a; John Benjamins Publishing Co., pp.113-134.

    Bruner, Jerome(1983), Child's Talk: Learning to Use Language, New York; W.W.

    norton & Company, Inc..

    Bruner, Jerome(1990), Acts of Meaning, Cambridge; Harvard University Press.

    Bruner, Jerome(1996), The Culture of Education, Cambridge; Harvard University

    Press, (2005), , . Bruner, Jerome(2002), Making Stories : Law, Literature, Life, Cambridge; Harvar

    d University Press.

    Labov, W. & J. Waletzky(1967), Narrative Analysis : Oral Versions of Personal

    Experience. in J. Helm(ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, Seat

    tle: University of Washington, pp.12-44.

    Lucius-Hoene, Gabriele & Arnulf Deppermann(2004), Rekonstruktion Narrativer I

    dentitt : Ein Arbeitsbuch Zur Analyse Narrativer Interviews, VS Verla

    g Fr Sozialwissenschaften GWV Fachverlage GmbH, (2006),

  • 236 36

    :

    , . Mandler, J.M. & Johnson, N.S.(1977), Rememberance of Things Phrased : Story

    Structure and Recall, Cognitive Psychology 9, pp.111-151.

    Morrow, L.M.(1990), Assessing children's understanding of story through their c

    onstruction of narrative. In L.M. Morrow & J.K. Smith(eds.), Assessmen

    t for Instruction in Early Literacy, Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Propp, V.(1928), ., : Academia, (201

    3), , . Rogers, C.R.(1980), A Way of Being, Houghton Mifflin Co., (2007),

    - , . Rumelhart, D.E.(1977), Understanding and Summarizing Brief Stories. In Laberg

    e, P. & J. Samuels, Basic Processes in Reading : Perception and Comp

    rehension, Hillsdale, N.J : Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Salmon C.(2008), Storytelling : La machine a fabriquer des histoires et a formate

    r les esprits. La Decouverte, (2010), : , .

    Stein, N.L. & C.G. Glenn(1979), An Analysis of Story Comprehension in Element

    ary School Children. In Feedle, Royo.(ed.), New Directions in Discourse

    Processing, norwood, N.J : Ablex Publishing Co., pp.53-120.

    Stein, N.L. & T. Trabasso(1981), Children's Knowledge of Event, A Causal Anal

    ysis of Story Structure, The Psychology of Learning and Motivation Vo

    l.15, pp.237-279.

    Thorne, B.(2003), Carl Rogers, London: Sage, (2007), , .

    White, M. & D. Epston(1990), Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends, N.Y.: W.W.

    norton & Co..

    Winslade, J. & G. Monk(1999), Narrative Counseling in Schools, Corwin Press In

    c., (2005), , .

  • 237

    - -

    ,

    . 1)

    , 2) , 3) .

    , , .

    , ,

    .

    , ,

    .

    , ,

    .

    .

    [] , , , ,

    ,

  • 238 36

    Abstract

    Research Trends on the Story Telling Ability

    and Story Telling Ability Development

    Yoo, Dong-Yup

    This study aims to examine the research trends of the story telling ability

    and its development, and to draw implications for oral communication

    education. To this end, it reviews the research trends of related studies, both

    home and abroad, by classifying it into three approaches: (1) descriptive

    approach, (2) prescriptive approach, and (3) therapeutic approach.

    (1) This study discusses the research trends of the descriptive approach

    with three axial propositions: story has structure, story grammar is

    described, story can be used as an educational tool.

    (2) The prescriptive approach uses the following three axial propositions:

    story is an ability, the indicators of the development of story-telling ability

    are quested, story telling ability development is described.

    (3) The research trends of the therapeutic approach employ the following

    three axial propositions: story is a metaphor, story is de-constructed and

    rewritten, story can be used as a means of personality education.

    [key words] story telling ability, the development of story telling ability,

    descriptive approach, prescriptive approach, therapeutic

    approach, oral communication education