7/24/2019 1. Beumer v Amores

1/5

G.R. No. 195670 December 3, 2012

WILLEM BEUMER, Petitioner,

vs.

AVELINA AMORE, Respondent.

D E C I S I O N

!ERLA"BERNABE, J.:

Before the Court is a Petition for Review on Certiorari1under Rule 4 of the Rules of Co!lli assailin" the

O#to$er %, &''( De#ision&and )anuar* &4, &'11 Resolution+of the #ourt of ppeals -C in C/0.R. C No.

'1(4', whi#h affir2ed the 3e$ruar* &%, &'' De#ision4of the Re"ional 5rial Court -R5C of Ne"ros Oriental,

Bran#h +4 in Civil Case No. I &%%4. 5he fore"oin" rulin"s dissolved the #on6u"al partnership of "ains of

7ille2 Beu2er -petitioner and velina 2ores -respondent and distri$uted the properties for2in" part of the

said propert* re"i2e.

5he 3a#tual nte#edents

Petitioner, a Dut#h National, and respondent, a 3ilipina, 2arried in 8ar#h &(, 1(%'. fter several *ears, the

R5C of Ne"ros Oriental, Bran#h +&, de#lared the nullit* of their 2arria"e in the De#isiondated Nove2$er 1',

&''' on the $asis of the for2er9s ps*#holo"i#al in#apa#it* as #onte2plated in rti#le +: of the 3a2il* Code.

Conse;uentl*, petitioner filed a Petition for Dissolution of Con6u"al Partnership:dated De#e2$er 14, &'''

pra*in" for the distri$ution of the followin" des#ri$ed properties #lai2ed to have $een a#;uired durin" the

su$sisten#e of their 2arria"e, to wit &14 of the Du2a"uete Cadastre, #overed

$* 5C5 No. &1+', #ontainin" an area of 4 s;.2.

B* wa* of inheritan#e