10/18/2014 · 10/18/2014 6 live load analysis step‐1‐determine forces/lane for hl93‐design...
TRANSCRIPT
10/18/2014
1
ตัวอย่าง การจําลอง โครงสร้างสะพานส่วนบนโดยนายเกรียงไกร คําพา
ตุลาคม 2557
DESIGNING OF REINFORCE CONCRETE DECK SLAB BRIDGE WITH AASHTO (LRFD) DESIGN SPECIFICATION
Abutment A Bent 1 Bent 2 Abutment BAbutment A Bent 1 Bent 2 Abutment B
Pier Cab
Wingwall
PileApproach Slab
Deck Slab
10/18/2014
2
SuperstructureDesign Example
Reinforce Concrete Deck Slab Bridge
Bridge Geometry
10m. 10m.10m.
30m.
b bAbutment A Bent 1 Bent 2 Abutment B
5m.
E.J. E.J. E.J. E.J.
10/18/2014
3
Bridge Deck Geometric Data
Side Railing CL of Bridge
Roadway width = 9 m.
Overall width = 10 m.
T
‐Overall bridge width = 10 m.‐Roadway width = 9 m.
‐Asphalt wearing surface = 60 mm. thickness.‐Bridge skew angle = 0 Degree‐Concrete Parapet Railing = 2 side (Section Area = 0.6m2 /side)
Section View
T
Wearing Surface
p g ( / )‐No. of Lane = 2 Lane
Elevation View
Bridge Span Length= 10 m.
Load Criteria
Dynamic Load Allowance (IM) Dynamic Impact Factor
‐Dynamic load factor for Truck & Tandem load (Service & Ultimate) = IM = 1.33‐Dynamic load factor at fatigue limit state = IM =1.15‐ (AASHTO, Table 3.6.2.1‐1)
Braking Force (BR) and Wind Load (W)
In this case, For superstructure design, braking forces and wind on live load are not applicable
Dead Load Components (DC) Structural and nonstructural attachment
‐Concrete BarrierC t D k‐Concrete Deck
‐Overlay and Wearing surface
Dead Load of Wearing Surface and Utilities (DW)
10/18/2014
4
Load CriteriaLive Load (LL)Design Vehicular Live Load HL93‐Design Vehicles Load (AASHTO, 3.6)
‐HS20‐44 Truck + Lane Load
4.3‐9.0
‐Tandem + Lane Load
Axle Configuration and Design Lane Width.
3000 mm
3600 mm
Design Thai Truck Load Thai Truck Factor x HL93 (AASHTO LRFD)
‐For Truck Weight limit is 51 Ton ‐Thai Truck Factor for simple span 5 to 20 m.Increasing Factored = 1.0 For Bending MomentIncreasing Factored = 1.05 For Shear Force & Reaction
3600 mm
Lane Load TransverseDistribution
Load CriteriaLive Load (LLFATIGUE)Design Vehicular Live Load for Fatigue Check (AASHTO, 3.6.1.4)
9.0
Configuration for Fatigue Load
IMPACT LOAD FOR FATIGUE CHECK = 1.15 (AASHTO 3.6.2)
Load Distribution Factored for Fatigue
Load Distribution for Fatigue, where the bridge is analyzed by approximate load distribution, as specified in Article 4.6.2, the distribution factor for one traffic lane shall be used.
10/18/2014
5
Unit Weight of Material
Concrete = 22.76 kN/m3 (2320 kg/m3)Reinforced Concrete = 24.03 kN/m3 (2450 kg/m3)Asphalt Wearing Surfaces = 22.07 kN/m3 (2250 kg/m3)Reinforcing Steel = 77.01 kN/m3 (7850 kg/m3)
Deck Thickness, T
For Simple Span T =1.2(S+3,000)/30
Determine Deck Thickness
=1.2(10,000+3000)/30=520mm > 175 mm O.K
Assume deck thickness = T = 600 mm. ‐‐Table 2.5.2.6.3‐1
Live Load Analysis byEquivalent Strip Width Method
(Approximate Methods)
10/18/2014
6
Live Load Analysis STEP‐1‐Determine Forces/Lane for HL93‐Design Vehicles Load
Maximum Moment Due to HS20‐44 Truck Loading
Direction
Span Length = 10 m.
M+max = 446.75 kN.m/Lane
NOTE: CALCULATE CHECK FOR DESIGN TRUCK LOAD
SIMPLE SPAN (L>10m.) PATTERN LOAD DUE TO MAXIMUM MOMENT
Lof BridgeC
2.85m 0.70m0.75m
145kN 35kN
RESULTANT OF FORCE =325kN
L/2‐0.70L/2+0.70
145kN
THE POSITION OF MAXIMUM MOMENT
4.30m
M+max = R1x{L/2+0.7} ‐ {145x4.3}= 187.05x5.7‐623.5= 442.685 kN.m/Lane
R1 = {162.5L+245.5}/L
= 187.05 kN
O.K.
R2 = {162.5L‐245.5}/L
= 137.95 kN
L = 10m
Difference =1%
10/18/2014
7
Live Load AnalysisSTEP‐1‐Determine Forces/Lane for HL93‐Design Vehicles Load
Maximum Shear Due to HS20‐44 Truck Loading
Direction
Span Length = 10 m.
Vmax = 232.55 kN/Lane
Live Load AnalysisSTEP‐1‐Determine Forces/Lane for HL93‐Design Vehicles Load
Maximum Moment Due to Tandem Loading
Direction
Span Length = 10 mSpan Length = 10 m.
M+max = 485.98 kN.m/Lane
10/18/2014
8
NOTE: CALCULATE CHECK FOR DESIGN TENDEM LOAD
SIMPLE SPAN (L>1.2m.) PATTERN LOAD DUE TO MAXIMUM MOMENT
Lof BridgeC
0.6m 0.3m0.3mTHE POSITION OF MAXIMUM
MOMENT
110kN 110kN
RESULTANT OF FORCE =220kN
L/2‐0.3L/2+0.3
M+max = R2x{L/2‐0.3} = 103.4x{5.0‐0.3}= 485.98 kN.m/Lane
R1 = {110.L+66}/L
= 116.6 kN
O.K.
R2 = {110.L‐66}/L
= 103.4 kN
L = 10m
Live Load AnalysisSTEP‐1‐Determine Forces/Lane for HL93‐Design Vehicles Load
Maximum Shear Due to Tandem Loading
Direction
Span Length = 10 m.
Vmax = 206.8 kN/Lane
10/18/2014
9
Live Load AnalysisSTEP‐1‐Determine Forces/Lane for HL93‐Design Vehicles Load
Maximum Moment Due to Uniform Lane Load
Span Length = 10 m.
Uniform Lane Load 9.3kN/m
M+max = 116.25 kN.m/Lane
Live Load AnalysisSTEP‐1‐Determine Forces/Lane for HL93‐Design Vehicles Load
Maximum Shear Due to Uniform Lane Load
Span Length = 10 m.
Uniform Lane Load 9.3kN/m
Vmax = 46.5 kN/Lane
10/18/2014
10
Live Load AnalysisSTEP‐1‐Determine Forces/Lane for HL93‐Design Vehicles Load
[Dynamic Factor x HS20‐44] + Lane Load
Maximum Moment for LLCASE‐1‐Truck+Lane
Direction
Span Length = 10 m
Uniform Lane Load 9.3kN/m
[1.33]
Span Length = 10 m.
M+max = 705.6 kN.m/Lane
Live Load AnalysisSTEP‐1‐Determine Forces/Lane for HL93‐Design Vehicles Load
[Dynamic Factor x HS20‐44] + Lane Load
Maximum Shear for LLCASE‐1‐Truck+Lane
Direction
Span Length = 10 m.
Uniform Live Load 9.3kN/m
[1.33]
Vmax = 355.8 kN/Lane
10/18/2014
11
Live Load AnalysisSTEP‐1‐Determine Forces/Lane for HL93‐Design Vehicles Load
[Dynamic Factor x Tandem] + Lane Load
Maximum Moment for LLCASE‐2‐Tandem+Lane
Direction
S h 0
[1.33]
Span Length = 10 m.
M+max = 762.185 kN.m/Lane
Live Load AnalysisSTEP‐1‐Determine Forces/Lane for HL93‐Design Vehicles Load
[Dynamic Factor x Tandem] + Lane Load
Maximum Shear for LLCASE‐2‐Tandem+Lane
Direction
Span Length = 10 m.
[1.33]
Vmax = 321.54 kN/Lane
10/18/2014
12
Live Load AnalysisSTEP‐1‐Determine Forces/Lane for HL93‐Design Vehicles LoadResult Summary
Envelop Maximum Bending Moment of LLCASE‐1‐Truck+Lane& LLCASE‐2‐Tandem+Lane
Mmax At X = 5.3 m
1.2 m
110 kN 110 kN
M+max = 762.185 kN.m/Lane
Tandam+Lane Govern to Design Moment
Live Load AnalysisSTEP‐1‐Determine Forces/Lane for HL93‐Design Vehicles LoadResult Summary
Envelop Maximum Shear Force of LLCASE‐1‐Truck+Lane& LLCASE‐2‐Tandem+Lane
Truck+Lane Govern to Design Shear
4.3 m
145 kN 145 kN 35 kN
4.3 m
Vmax = 355.8 kN/Lane
10/18/2014
13
FORCES VS SPAN LENGTH HL‐93 LIVE LOAD
TANDEM + LANE LOAD WILL BE GOVERN TO DESIGN SHEAR FORCE WHEN SPAN LENGTH
> 7.6 m.
NOTE:
FORCES VS SPAN LENGTH HL‐93 LIVE LOAD
TRUCK + LANE LOAD WILL BE GOVERN TO DESIGN MOMENT
WHEN SPAN LENGTH> 12.2 m.
NOTE:
10/18/2014
14
FORCES VS SPAN LENGTH HL‐93 LIVE LOAD
Reference : LRFD Bridge Design Manual: Minnesota Department of Transportation
Live Load Analysis (Approximate Methods)STEP‐2‐Determine the Equivalent Strip Width
Equivalent Strip Width for Interior SlabFor One Lane
Es = 0.25+0.42(L1xW1)1/2 < W/NL
L = Min(18 Or 10 m ) = 10m
For Multilane
Em = 2.10+0.12(L1xW1)1/2 < W/NL
L1 = Min(18 Or 10 m.) = 10m.W1 = Min(18 Or 10m.) = 10m.
L1 = Min(18 Or 10 m.) = 10m.W1 = Min(9 Or 10m.) = 9m.
Es = 0.25+0.42(10x9)1/2 = 4.23 m. < W/NL =10/2 = 5m. ‐‐Eq‐4.6.2.3‐1
1
Em = 2.10+0.12(10x9)1/2 = 3.3 m. < W/NL =10/2 = 5m. ‐‐Eq‐4.6.2.3‐2
Em
10/18/2014
15
Live Load Analysis (Approximate Methods)STEP‐2‐Determine the Equivalent Strip Width
Equivalent Strip Width for Edge Slab
Es = 4.23 m, Wedge = 0.5 m.
Ee = Wedge+0.30+Es/4
Ee = 1.8 m.
NL = 10/3.6 = 2.77 = 2 Design Lane
e edge s
= 0.5+0.3+[4.23/4]= 1.86 m.but not exceed ether 0.5xEs= 2.12m. or 1.8m.
So, Use the design equivalent strip widthEe = 1.8 m. and Em = 3.3 m. ‐‐4.6.2.1.4be m
r =1.05‐0.25(tan θ˚) = 1.05‐0.25(tan 0˚) = 1.05 ≤ 1.0 =1.0 ‐‐Eq‐4.6.2.3‐1
Ee
Live Load Analysis (Approximate Methods)STEP‐3‐Calculate Forces on Bridge Deck per Strip Width.
Live Load for Interior slab design LL = Transient Loads, HL93
Consider moment at 5.3 m from supportMoment with impact factorMHL93+IM = 762.18 kN.m/laneMLL_INTERIOR = 762.18xr/[Em] = 762.18x1.0/[3.3] =230.97 kN.m/mConsider shear force at supportVHL93+IM = 355.8 kN/laneThai Truck Increase Factored for Shear = 1.05VLL_INTERIOR = 1.05x355.80xr/[Em] = 1.05x355.80x1.0/[3.3]
= 113.21 kN/m
10/18/2014
16
Live Load Analysis (Approximate Methods)STEP‐3‐Calculate Forces on Bridge Deck per Strip Width.
Live Load for edge slab design
Edge beam is assumed to support one line of truck axle
Ee
Live Load Analysis (Approximate Methods)STEP‐3‐Calculate Forces on Bridge Deck per Strip Width.
Live Load for edge slab design LL = Transient Loads, HL93
Edge beam is assumed to support one line of truck axle. Lane load is considered by tributary portion by= [Ee‐Wedge]/3 = [1.8‐0.5]/3 = 0.43 RatioMoment with impact factorMONE LINE TRUCK AXLE+IM = 485.98x1.33/2 = 323.18 kN.m/laneMLANE LOAD = 116.25 kN.m/laneMLL_EDGE SLAB = 323.18+0.43x116.25 = 373.37 kN.m
= 373.37xr/[Ee] = 373.37x1.0/[1.8] =207.43 kN.m/m
Consider shear force at supportThai Truck Increase Factored for Shear 1 05Thai Truck Increase Factored for Shear = 1.05VONE LINE TRUCK AXLE+IM = 232.55x1.33/2= 154.65 kN/laneVLANE LOAD = 46.50 kN/laneVLL_EDGE SLAB = 154.65+0.43x46.5 = 174.80 kN/lane
= 1.05x174.80xr/[Em] = 1.05x174.80x1.0/[1.8] =101.97 kN/m
10/18/2014
17
Live Load Analysis (Approximate Methods)STEP‐3‐Calculate Forces on Bridge Deck per Strip Width.
Live Load for Fatigue Check
LLFATIGUE = Transient Loads, Fatigue
Consider moment at 5.3 m from supportMoment with impact factor (IM factor =1.15, Distribution Factor =1.2)MFATIGUE_EDGE = 1.2x[1.15x377.89/2] x r/[Es]
= 1.2x217.3x1.0/[1.80] = 144.9 kN.m/mMFATIGUE_INTERIOR = 1.2x[1.15x377.89] x r/[Em]
= 1.2x435.6x1.0/[3.3] = 158.1 kN.m/m
9.0
Live Load Analysis (Approximate Methods)STEP‐3‐Calculate Forces on Bridge Deck per Strip Width.
DC = Dead load structural components and nonstructural attachments
DCDECK = 0.6x24.03 =14.42 kN/m2
Consider at X = 5.3 m. from support and r = 1.0MDECK = 14.42x5.3x(10.0‐5.3) x1.0 /2 x1.0 =179.61 kN.m/mConsider at support and r = 1.0VDECK = 14.42x10.0 x1.0 /2 x1.0 =72.1 kN/m
DCBARRIER = 0.5x24.03/10 =1.2 kN/m2
Consider at X = 5.3 m. from support and r = 1.0MBARRIER = 1.2x5.3x(10.0‐5.3) x1.0 /2 x1.0 =14.97 kN.m/mConsider at support and r = 1.0V = 1 2x10 0 x1 0 /2 x1 0 =6 01 kN/m
NOTE: Assume traffic barriers load are distribute equally over the full bridge cross‐section.
VBARRIER = 1.2x10.0 x1.0 /2 x1.0 =6.01 kN/m
Consider at X = 5.3 m. from support and r = 1.0MDC= 179.61 + 14.97 =194.58 kN.m/mConsider at support and r = 1.0VDC = 72.1 + 6.01 =78.11 kN/m
10/18/2014
18
Live Load Analysis (Approximate Methods)STEP‐3‐Calculate Forces on Bridge Deck per Strip Width.
DW = Dead load of wearing surfaces and utilities
DWWEARING SURFACE = 0.06x22.07x9.0/10 =1.19 kN/m2
Consider at X = 5.3 m. from support and r = 1.0MWEARING SURFACE = 1.19x5.3x(10.0‐5.3) x1.0 /2 x1.0 =14.85 kN.m/mConsider at support and r = 1.0VWEARING SURFACE = 1.19x10.0x1.0/2 x1.0 = 5.96 kN/m
FORCES DC DW LL+IM LLFATIGUE
Moment (kN.m/m)
Summary Design Forces
MINTERIOR STRIP 194.58 14.85 230.97 158.1
MEDGE STRIP 194.58 14.85 207.43 144.9
SHEAR (kN/m)
VINTERIOR STRIP 78.11 5.96 113.21 ‐
VEDGE STRIP 78.11 5.96 101.97 ‐
Load Combination
Service I = 1.0DC+1.0DW+1.0[LL+IM]Strength I = 1.25DC+1.5DW+1.75[LL+IM]Fatigue I = 1.5[LLFATIGUE]
Interior StripMomentMoment
Service I = 1.0x194.58+1.0x14.85+1.0x230.97 = 440.39 kN.m/m
Strength I = 1.25x194.58+1.5x14.85+1.75x230.97= 669.68 kN.m/m
Fatigue I = 1.5x158.1= 237.1 kN.m/m
Shear
Service I = 1.0x78.11+1.0x5.96+1.0x113.21 = 197.28 kN.m/m
Strength I = 1.25x78.11+1.5x5.96+1.75x113.21= 304.7 kN.m/m
10/18/2014
19
Load Combination
Service I = 1.0DC+1.0DW+1.0[LL+IM]Strength I = 1.25DC+1.5DW+1.75[LL+IM]Fatigue I = 1.5[LLFATIGUE]
Edge StripMomentMoment
Service I = 1.0x194.58+1.0x14.85+1.0x207.43 = 416.85 kN.m/m
Strength I = 1.25x194.58+1.5x14.85+1.75x207.43= 628.5 kN.m/m
Fatigue I = 1.5x144.9= 217.4 kN.m/m
Shear
Service I = 1.0x78.11+1.0x5.96+1.0x101.97= 186.04 kN.m/m
Strength I = 1.25x78.11+1.5x5.96+1.75x101.97= 285.1 kN.m/m
Bridge Deck Reinforcement Design
10/18/2014
20
Reinforce Concrete Design
Concrete‐Compressive strength at 28 days (Cylinder) fc
’ = 25 Mpa.‐Modulus of elasticity, Ec = Wc
1.5 .0.0428.fc1/2
= 2,3201.5 x0.0428x251/2
E 23 914 M
Material Properties
‐‐5.4.2.4
Ec = 23,914 Mpa.‐Thermal expansion coefficient t = 0.0000108 m/m/ ˚C‐Relative humidity of the ambient temperature = 80 % ==> Use for Design Expansion Joint (Creep & Shrinkage)‐Minimum Concrete Covering = 50 mm.SteelGrade SD40Yield strength fy = 390 Mpa.Tensile Strength = 560 Mpa
‐‐5.4.2.2
‐‐TIS & ASTM
‐‐Table 5.12.3.1
Tensile Strength = 560 Mpa.Modulus of elasticity, Es = 200,000 Mpa.Temp.(˚C)High = 50 ˚C , Low = 15 ˚C , Mean = 30 ˚C
Reinforce Concrete Design
Resistance Factor
Figure C5.5.4.2.1‐1 Variation of with net tensile strain
‐‐5.5.4.2.1‐2
c = distance from the extreme compression fiber to neutral axis (mm)
dt = distance from the extreme compression fiber to centroid of the extreme tension steel element (mm)
10/18/2014
21
Reinforce Concrete Design
Resistance Factor
For Non‐ Prestress Concrete ReinforcementUsed Resistance Factored = 0.9 for Tension Controlled
Nominal Flexural Resistance (Need to design with tension controlled)
C = 0.85.fc’.a.bfc’
ᵋc = 0.003 compression
c
de
b
N.A. N.A.
a
a = 1.c 0.85.fc’
1 = 0.85 > 0.85‐(fc'‐28)/140 > 0.65 ‐‐5.7.2.2
de – a/2
fs = fy
Section Strain
ᵋs = 0.005 TensionAs
Section Dimension
Force Equilibrium
T = As .fy
Actual Stress
Reinforce Concrete Design
Nominal Flexural Resistance
Force Equilibrium: Compression = TensionC = T
0.85.fc’.a.b = As.fya = As.fy / 0.85.fc’.b A f / 0 85 f ’ b1.c = As.fy / 0.85.fc’.bc = As.fy / 0.85.fc’.b .1
From strain compatibility condition for tension controlledc/0.003 = de /[0.003+0.005]
For Non‐ Prestress Concrete ReinforcementUsed Resistance Factored = 0.9
c/de = 0.375
‐‐Eq 5.7.3.1.2‐4
Used Resistance Factored 0.9
If the ratio of c/de ≤ 0.375 ==> Tension Controlled
Flexural capacity .Mn = .As.fy.[de‐a/2] ‐‐5.7.3.2
10/18/2014
22
Reinforce Concrete Design
Positive Moment DesignStrength Limit State: Strength I
Mu‐max = Max(669.7, 628.5) = 669.7 kN.m/mTry to provide steel bar = [email protected] { d2/4} 1 000/100 4 909 2 Eq 5 7 3 1 2 4
Flexural Reinforcement
As‐provide = {.d2/4}x1,000/100 = 4,909 mm2
1 = 0.85, b = 1,000 mm.c = As.fy / 0.85.fc’.b .1
= 4,909x390 / {0.85x25x1,000x0.85}= 106 mm.
a = 1.c = 0.85x106 = 90.1 mm.de = 600‐(50)covering ‐(25/2) = 537.5 mm.Check c/de =106/537.5 = 0.197 ≤ 0.375 ==> Tension Controlled = 0 9
‐‐5.7.2.2
‐‐Eq 5.7.3.1.2‐4
‐‐5.5.4.2.1‐2 0.9.Mn = 0.9x4,909x390[537.5‐(90.1/2)] /1,000,000
= 848.5 kN.m/m > 669.7 kN.m/m O.K.Capacity Ratio = 669.7/848.5= 0.79Use the bottom bar parallel to traffic are DB25@100
NOTE: DB25@125==>(.Mn = 622.3 kN.m)
5.5.4.2.1 2
Reinforce Concrete Design
Mr is the lesser of 1.2Mcr and 1.33Mu
Modulus of rupture for cracking moment calculation
Minimum Reinforcement (Cracking Moment)
Positive Moment DesignStrength Limit State: Strength I
fr = 0.97.fc’1/2 = 0.97x251/2
= 4.85 Mpa.Sc = b.h
2/6 = 1.0x0.62/6 = 0.06 m3/m.
1.2Mcr = 1.2.Sc.fr = 1.2x0.06x4.85x1000 = 349.2 kN.m
1.33Mu = 1.33x628.5 = 835.9 kN.mMr = 349.2 kN.m
‐‐ 5.4.2.6
Use the bottom bar parallel to traffic are [email protected] = 848.5 kN.m/m > 349.2 kN.m/m O.K.
10/18/2014
23
Reinforce Concrete Design
LRFD states that for cast‐in‐place slab superstructures designed for moment in conformance with LRFD 4.6.2.3,
Shear Capacity Check
Positive Moment DesignStrength Limit State: Strength I
‐‐ 5.14.4.1
may be considered satisfactory for shear.Vu = Max(304.7, 285.1) = 304.7 kN.v = 0.9.Vc = .0.083∙β∙f c’1/2∙b∙dβ = 2.0b = 1,000 mm., d = 537.5 mm., f c‘= 25 Mpa..Vc = 0.90x0.083x2.0x251/2x1000x537.5/1,000
= 401.5 kN. > 304.7 kN. O.K.
‐‐ Eq. 5.8.3.3‐3
‐‐5.8.3.4.1
‐‐5.5.4.2
Reinforce Concrete Design
Positive Moment DesignService Limit State: Service ICrack Control by Distribution Reinforcement
‐‐ Eq.5.7.3.4‐1Spacing of reinforcement in the layer closest to tension face S ≤ {123,000.e/[s.fss]}‐2.dcs = 1+dc/{0.7.[h‐dc]}h = overall thicknesse = exposure factor
= 1.00 for Class 1 exposure condition (crack width 0.430mm)(Upper bound in regards to crack width for appearance and corrosion.)
= 0.75 for Class 2 exposure condition (crack width 0.325mm)(Include decks and substructures exposed to water.)d = thickness of concrete cover measured from extremedc = thickness of concrete cover measured from extreme tension fiber to center of the flexural reinforcement located closest thereto (mm)fss = tensile stress in steel reinforcement at the service limit stateIn the application of these provisions to meet the needs of the Authority having jurisdiction. The crack width is directly proportional to the e exposure factor by Authority.e = 0.5/0.21x (crack width‐0.22) +0.5
10/18/2014
24
Reinforce Concrete Design
Positive Moment DesignService Limit State: Service ICrack Control by Distribution Reinforcement
M+ = Max(440.39, 416.85 ) = 440.4 kN.m/mCheck concrete cracked at bottom fiber (Concrete tension)C ec co c ete c ac ed at botto be (Co c ete te s o )Modulus of rupture = fr = 0.63.fc’
1/2 = 3.15 Mpa. h = 0.6 m., Ig = b.h
3/12 = 0.018 m4/1m. Widthfc‐tension = M.(h/2)/Ig = 7.34 Mpa. > 0.8fr = 2.5 Mpa.
Section is cracked
Elastic Cracked Section Property at Service State (Cracked, Linear Stage, approximately fc<0.45fc’)
/ b d /[ ]
‐‐ 5.7.3.4 &5.4.2.6
= As/ b.d = 4,909/[1,000x537.5] = 0.0087Modular Ratio, n = Es/Ec = 200,000/23,914 = 8.36k = [2n.+(n.)2]1/2‐n. = 0.3218J = 1‐k/3 =0.893fc,comp =2.M /(k∙j∙b∙d2) = 10.61 Mpa. < 0.45fc’=11.25 Mpa.
‐‐ 5.7.1.4
Reinforce Concrete Design
Positive Moment DesignService Limit State: Service ICrack Control by Distribution Reinforcement
Elastic Cracked Section Property at Service State (Cracked, Linear Stage , approximately fc<0.45fc’)f M/ A j d 440 4/ [49 09 0 89 0 54] 187 M
C = 0.5.k.d.fc
fck.d /3
h
ᵋc
k.d
d
b
N A N A
fss = M/ As.j.d = 440.4/ [49.09x0.89x0.54] = 187 Mpa.dc = 50covering+[25/2] = 62.5 mm., h = 600 mm.In this design example used e = 0.50 (crack width 0.22mm)
fss
Section Dimension
Force Equilibrium
Section Strain
ᵋs
N.A.
As
N.A.
T = As .fss
M j.d
Actual Stress
10/18/2014
25
Reinforce Concrete Design
Positive Moment DesignService Limit State: Service ICrack Control by Distribution Reinforcement
s = 1+dc/{0.7.[h‐dc]} = 1+62.5/{0.7x[600‐62.5]}/{ [ ]}= 1.17
Minimum Spacing of reinforcement in the layer closest to tension face to control concrete cracked (0.22mm.).
S = {123,000.e/[s.fss]}‐2.dc = [123,000x0.5/(1.17x187)]‐2x62.5
S = 157 mm.Use the bottom bar parallel to traffic are DB25@100Sprovide = 100 mm. ≤ 157mm. O.K.
Reinforce Concrete Design
Distribution Reinforcement
Reinforcement shall be placed in the secondary direction in the bottom of slabs as a percentage of the primary reinforcement for positive moment
‐‐9.7.3.2 & 5.14.4
Bottom reinforcement parallel to trafficBottom reinforcement parallel to traffic = DB25@100 = 4,909 mm2 , L = 10,000 mm.%.As = 1,750/ L
1/2 ≤ 50%= 1,750/ 10,0001/2
= 17.5%As, For bottom bar perpendicular to traffic
= 17.5% x 4,909 = 860 mm2
Use the bottom bar perpendicular to traffic are DB12@125(As = 905 mm2)
‐‐ Eq 5.14.4.1‐1
10/18/2014
26
Reinforce Concrete Design
Shrinkage & Temperature Reinforcement
Reinforcement for shrinkage and temperature stresses shall be provided near to daily temperature changes and in structural mass concrete in each direction and each face.
‐‐5.10.8
A ≥ 0 75∙b∙h / { 2∙[b+h]∙fy } ‐‐ Eq 5 10 8‐1As ≥ 0.75 b h / { 2 [b+h] fy }As = 0.75x1.0x0.6/{2x[1.0+0.6]x390}= 3.6x10‐4 m2 /m.= 360.6 mm2 /m.
233 ≤ As ≤ 1,270 mm2 /m. O.K.
Use the Top bar perpendicular & parallel to traffic are DB12@250 (As = 452 mm2)
Eq. 5.10.8 1
‐‐ Eq. 5.10.8‐2
Reinforce Concrete Design
Fatigue Limit State Check
Maximum Moment due to Permanent Load (MPE) = DC+DW =194.58+14.85 = 209.42 kN.m/mMaximum Moment due to Fatigue I (Mtruck)=Max(237.1, 217.4) = 237.1 kN.m/m
Elastic Cracked Section Property at Fatigue Limit State (Cracked, Linear Stage, approximately fc<0.45fc’)For permanent load ,at the service and fatigue limit states ,use an effective modular ratio of 2n.n = 2.Es/Ec =2x8.36 =16.7 = As/ b.d = 4,909/[1,000x537.5] = 0.0087
‐‐5.7.1
Load Combination= 209.42+237.1 = 446.5 kN.m/m
s
k = [2n.+(n.)2]1/2‐n. = 0.421J = 1‐k/3 =0.860, Ig =0.018 m4/m.Check property of sectionlimit for crack section fc ≥ 0.25.f c’1/2 = 1.25 Mpa.fc‐tension = M.(h/2)/Ig = 446.5x(0.3)/0.018x1000
= 7.42Mpa. > 1.25 Mpa.Section is cracked
‐‐5.5.3.1
10/18/2014
27
Reinforce Concrete Design
Fatigue Limit State Check
Elastic Cracked Section Property at Fatigue Limit State (Cracked, Linear Stage, approximately fc<0.45fc’)fc,comp =2.M /(k∙j∙b∙d2)
= 2x446.5/[0.421x0.86x1.0x0.53752]x1000= 8.54 Mpa. < 0.45fc’=11.25 Mpa.
Fatigue Limit Stress in Steel Bar Checkedγ(Δf) ≤ (ΔF)TH Δf = force effect, live load stress range due to the passage of the fatigue load as specified in Article 3.6.1.4 (Mpa.)γ = load factor specified in Table 3.4.1‐1 for the (ΔF)TH = 166 ‐ 0.33 fMIN = constant‐amplitude fatigue thresholdfMIN = minimum live‐load stress resulting from the Fatigue I load
bi i bi d i h h f i h
‐‐Eq.5.5.3.2‐2
‐‐Eq.5.5.3.2‐1
combination, combined with the more severe stress from either the permanent loads or the permanent loads, shrinkage, and creep‐induced external loads;
Reinforce Concrete Design
Fatigue Limit State Check
Fatigue Limit Stress in Steel Bar Checkedγ(Δf) = Mtruck /As.j.d = 237.1x1,000/ [4,909x0.86x0.54]
= 104 Mpa.fMIN = MPE /As.j.d = 209.42x1,000/ [4,909x0.86x0.54] MIN PE s
= 92.39 Mpa.(ΔF)TH = 166 ‐ 0.33 fMIN
= 166 ‐ 0.33x92.39= 135.54 Mpa.
γ(Δf) = 104 Mpa. ≤ (ΔF)TH = 135.54 Mpa. O.K.
10/18/2014
28
Expansion Joint DesignTemperature Movement
High = 50 ˚C , Low = 15 ˚C , Mean = 30 ˚CTemp. Rise = TT‐Rise = 50‐30 = 20 ˚CTemp. Fall = TT‐Fall =15‐30 = ‐15 ˚CThermal expansion of concrete = t = 1.08x10
‐5 m/m/˚CSlab span length =10 mSlab span length =10 m.Displacement XT‐Rise = t.TT‐Rise.L = 1.08x10‐5 x 20x10,000 = 2.16 mm.XT‐Fall = t.TT‐Fall.L = 1.08x10‐5 x ‐15x10,000 = ‐1.62 mm.
Creep and Shrinkage Movement
Creep of the concrete for expansion joint design is ignored.
Shrinkage Strain = ᵋSH = Kvs.Khs.Kf.Ktd.0.48x10‐3
In the absence of more accurate data the shrinkage
‐‐Eq. 5.4.2.3.3‐1
5 4 2 3 1In the absence of more accurate data, the shrinkage coefficients may be assumed to be 0.0002 after 28 days and0.0005 after one year of drying. So, Consider the effect of shrinkage after one year of drying
ᵋSH = 0.0005 (Approximately)
Xsrinkage = ᵋSH.L = 0.0005x10,000 = ‐5 mm.
‐‐ 5.4.2.3.1
Expansion Joint DesignFor conventional concrete structures,the movement is based on the greater of two cases:Movement from Shrinkage and Temperature
X = XT‐Fall+Xsrinkage = ‐1.62 – 5 = ‐6.62 mm.
Movement from factored effects of Temperature
Factored effects of temperature =1.15X = 1.15xXT‐Rise = 1.15x2.16 = 2.48 mm.
‐‐ FDOT criteria (SDG 6.4.2 )
10/18/2014
29
Camber DiagramEffective Moment of Inertia of Slab
Time to remove of formwork = 14 days.fc‘ at 14 days = 20 Mpa. Ec at 14 days = = 2,320
1.5 x0.0428x201/2 = 21,389 Mpa. fr at 14 days = 0.623.fc’
1/2 = 2.79 Mpa. A 4 909 mm2 A / b d 0 0087
‐‐5.7.3.6.2
‐‐5.4.2.4
As = 4,909 mm2, = As/ b.d = 0.0087n = Es/Ec = 8.36k = 0.3218J =0.893Icr =b.(k.d)
3/3+n.As.(d‐k.d)2 = 0.007178 m4/m
Ig = 0.018000 m4/m
Mcr = fr .Ig/yt = 2.79x0.018/ (0.60/2) = 167.17 kN.m/mDCDECK+BARRIER = 14.42+1.2 =15.62 kN/m
2 /mMa = 15.62x10
2/8 = 195.28 kN.m/mMa 15.62x10 /8 195.28 kN.m/m
Ie =(167.17/195.28)3x0.018+[1‐(167.17/195.28)3]x0.007178
= 0.0142 m4/m ≤ Ig = 0.018000 m4/m
‐‐Eq. 5.7.3.6.2‐1
Camber Diagram
W0 = 15.62 kN/m2/m
Ec = 21,389 Mpa, Ie = 0.0142 m4/m
= W0 .X.(L3‐2.L.X2+X3)/(24Ec.Ie)
Pre‐Camber of formwork to compensate immediately sag of the deck profile at time
10/18/2014
30
Live Load Deflection Check
The deflection should be taken as the larger of:‐That resulting from the design truck alone, or‐That resulting from 25 percent of design truck + lane load
Limit of deflection for simple span = L/80010 000/800 12 5 mm
‐‐2.5.2.6.2
‐‐3.6.1.3.2
= 10,000/800 = 12.5 mm.Design equivalent strip widthEm = 3.3 m.Ie = 0.0142 m4/m x 3.3 m. = 0.04686 m4
Ec = 23,914 Mpa.
Maximum Deflection due to Lane Load at Mid Span = 1.0896 mm.Maximum Deflection due toMaximum Deflection due to Truck Load at Mid Span = 4.1419 mmMaximum Deflection due to Tandem Load at Mid Span = 4.0406 mm
Maximum Deflection = Max{4.1419, 1.0896+[4.1419x25/100]} = 4.1419 mm. < 12.5 mm. O.K.
Summary of Steel Reinforcement
Steel Reinforcement No. of Steel Bar Bars Sign
Bottom bar parallel to traffic
DB25@100 AS4
Bottom bar perpendicular DB12@125 AS2p pto traffic
@
Top bar parallel to traffic
DB12@250 AS3
Top bar perpendicular to traffic
DB12@250 AS1
10/18/2014
31
Steel Reinforcement DetailsExample Slab Bridge Details from DOT Standard Drawing
Steel Reinforcement DetailsExample Slab Bridge Details from DOT Standard Drawing
10/18/2014
32
Steel Reinforcement DetailsExample Slab Bridge Details from DOT Standard Drawing
Steel Reinforcement DetailsExample Slab Bridge Details from DOT Standard Drawing
10/19/2014
1
ตัวอย่าง การจําลอง โครงสร้างสะพานส่วนล่างโดยนายเกรียงไกร คําพา
ตุลาคม 2557
SubstructureDesign Example AASHTO (LRFD)
Design Specification
10/19/2014
2
Bridge Geometry
10m. 10m.10m.
30m.
b bAbutment A Bent 1 Bent 2 Abutment B
5m.
E.J. E.J. E.J. E.J.
Out Line Design Member
SubstructureAbutment A ===> Wingwall, Pier Cab, PileAbutment B ===> Wingwall, Pier Cab, PileBent 1 ===> Pier Cab, PileBent 2 ===> Pier Cab, PileMiscellaneous StructureMiscellaneous Structure Approach SlabConcrete Railing
Abutment A Bent 1 Bent 2 Abutment B
Pier Cab Deck Slab
Wingwall
PileApproach Slab
10/19/2014
3
Approach Slab Design
Bridge Approach Slab Analysis & Design Criteria 1. The bridge approach slab is designed as a slab in accordance with Section 4.6 of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (Strength I loading, IM = 1.33). 2. The end support is assumed to be a uniform soil reaction with a bearing pp glength that is approximately 1/3 the length of the approach slab. 3.The Effective Span Length (Seff) is assumed to be: Seff = L‐ (L/3)/2 ‐ a/2 ; L= Approach Slab Length, a = Support Seat Width
4. Longitudinal steel reinforcing bars do not require modification for skewed applications. 5. The maximum skew accommodated by the standard design is 30 degrees.
/a/2L
L/3
SeffL/6a/2
Seff
Simple Support
Wing Wall Design
Wingwalls may either be designed as monolithic with the abutments, or be separated from the abutment wall with an expansion joint and designed to be free standing.
The wingwall lengths shall be computed using the required roadway slopes. Wingwalls shall be of sufficient length to retain the roadway p g g yembankment and to furnish protection against erosion.
Ref. 11.6.1.4
Lateral Earth Pressure &
Wingwall Length
Lateral Pressure due to Top Surcharge Load
Edge of Abutment
Mu
10/19/2014
4
SubstructurePier Cab Design
Load Transfer to Pier CabLive Load Analysis Case 1
E.J.
9.3kN/m
Pattern Live Load due to Maximum Moment on Pier Cab and Maximum Axial Force on Pile
10/19/2014
5
Load Transfer to Pier CabLive Load Analysis Case 1
9.3kN/m
9.70m.0.30m.
9.70m.
R1 R2 R3 R4
[R2+R3][R2+R3]max
Maximum Reaction Force = [Truck+Impact] + Lane LoadInterior Strip [Em = 3.3 m.]Interior Strip [R2+R3]max = {[1.33x242]+[9.3x10]}/3.3 = 125.76 kN/mEdge Strip [Ee = 1.8 m.] Edge Strip [R2+R3]max = {[1.33x242/2]+[0.43x9.3x10]}/1.8 = 111.62 kN/m
Load Transfer to Pier CabLive Load Analysis Case 2
E.J.
9.3kN/m
Pattern Live Load due to Maximum Torsion on Pier Cab and Maximum Bending Moment on Pile
10/19/2014
6
Pier CabLoad Transfer to Pier CabSummary Load from Super Structure Transfer to Pier Cab
FORCES DC DW LL1(Truck+Lane)
Case‐1
LL2(Truck+Lane)
Case‐2
LL1+IM Case‐1
LL2+IM Case‐2
Reaction Force (kN/m)
INTERIOR STRIP 156.3 11.92 101.52 84.56 125.76 107.82
EDGE STRIP 156.3 11.92 89.44 75.71 111.62 97.02
Dynamic load allowance need not be applied to foundation components that are
Estimate No. of Pile
Dynamic load allowance need not be applied to foundation components that are entirely below ground level. Maximum Load = {[156.3+5.96]x1.1+101.52}x10.2 = 2,923 kN/BentUsed Pile Diameter 0.4x0.4 m Safe Load 700 kN/PileNo. of Pile = 2,923/700 = 4.2 So, Used 5‐Pile 0.4x0.4 Safe Load 700kN/Pile
Pile Bent Dimension & Geometry
0.6m.
0.7m.
10m.
Cap Beam Section
2.25m.0.6m. 0.6m.
10.2m.2.25m.2.25m.2.25m.
10/19/2014
7
Pier Cap Design Force
DCSelf Weight = 10.1 kN/m
SFD
0.6m. 2.25 m. 2.25 m. 2.25 m. 0.6m.2.25 m.
BMD
Pier Cap Design Force
DCsuper= 156.3 kN/m
SFD
0.6m. 2.25 m. 2.25 m. 2.25 m. 0.6m.2.25 m.
BMD
10/19/2014
8
Pier Cap Design Force
DW= 11.92 kN/m
SFD
0.6m. 2.25 m. 2.25 m. 2.25 m. 0.6m.2.25 m.
BMD
Pier Cap Design ForceLive Load Case 1 LL1+IM = 125.76 kN/m Positive Max
SFD
0.6m. 2.25 m. 2.25 m. 2.25 m. 0.6m.2.25 m.
BMD
10/19/2014
9
Pier Cap Design ForceLive Load Case 2 LL1+IM = 125.76 kN/m Negative Max
SFD
0.6m. 2.25 m. 2.25 m. 2.25 m. 0.6m.2.25 m.
BMD
Pier Cap Design ForceSummary Design Force
FORCES SW DW DC LL1+IM LL2+IM
Moment (kN.m)
M 3 2 48 8 3 7 64 1M+ 3.2 48.8 3.7 64.1 ‐
M‐ ‐4.8 ‐74.8 ‐5.7 ‐ ‐72.6
Shear (kN)
V 12.7 196.5 15 156.1 173.8
Moment M+ (Service I) = 1.00x[3.2+48.8]+1.0x[3.7]+1.00x[64.1] = 119.8 kN.m
Design Force Moment & Shear
Moment M+ (Strength I) = 1.25x[3.2+48.8]+1.5x[3.7]+1.75x[64.1] = 182.8 kN.m
Moment M‐ (Service I) = 1.00x[4.8+74.8]+1.0x[5.7]+1.00x[72.6] = ‐157.9 kN.mMoment M‐ (Strength I) = 1.25x[4.8+74.8]+1.5x[5.7]+1.75x[72.6] = ‐235.1 kN.m
Shear (Strength I) = 1.25x[12.7+196.5]+1.5x[15]+1.75x[173.8] = 588.15 kN
10/19/2014
10
Reinforce Concrete Design
Positive Moment DesignStrength Limit State: Strength I
Mu+max = +182.8 kN.mTry to provide steel bar = 4‐DB20.A { d2/4} 4 1 257 2 Eq 5 7 3 1 2 4
Flexural Reinforcement
As‐provide = {.d2/4}x4= 1,257 mm2
1 = 0.85, b = 600 mm.c = As.fy / 0.85.fc’.b .1
= 1,257x390 / {0.85x25x600x0.85}= 45.23 mm.
a = 1.c = 0.85x45.23 = 38.45 mm.de = 700‐(50)covering ‐12‐(25/2) = 625.5 mm.Check c/de =45.23/625.5 = 0.07 ≤ 0.375 ==> Tension Controlled = 0 9
‐‐5.7.2.2
‐‐Eq 5.7.3.1.2‐4
‐‐5.5.4.2.1‐2 0.9.Mn = 0.9x1,257x390[625.5‐(38.45/2)] /1,000,000
= 267.5 kN.m > 182.8 kN.m O.K.Capacity Ratio = 182.8/267.5= 0.68
Use the bottom bar are 4‐DB20
5.5.4.2.1 2
Reinforce Concrete Design
Mr is the lesser of 1.2Mcr and 1.33Mu
Modulus of rupture for cracking moment calculation
Minimum Reinforcement (Cracking Moment)
Positive Moment DesignStrength Limit State: Strength I
fr = 0.97.fc’1/2 = 0.97x251/2
= 4.85 Mpa.Sc = b.h
2/6 = 0.6x0.72/6 = 0.049 m3/m.
1.2Mcr = 1.2.Sc.fr = 1.2x0.049x4.85x1000 = 285.2 kN.m
1.33Mu = 1.33x182.8 = 243.2 kN.mMr = 243.2 kN.mUse the bottom bar are 4 DB20
‐‐ 5.4.2.6
Use the bottom bar are 4‐DB20.Mn = 272.8 kN.m > 243.2 kN.m O.K.
10/19/2014
11
Reinforce Concrete Design
Positive Moment DesignService Limit State: Service ICrack Control by Distribution Reinforcement
M+ = 119.8 kN.mCheck concrete cracked at bottom fiber (Concrete tension)C ec co c ete c ac ed at botto be (Co c ete te s o )Modulus of rupture = fr = 0.63.fc’
1/2 = 3.15 Mpa. b=0.6 m., h = 0.7 m., Ig = b.h
3/12 = 0.01715 m4
fc‐tension = M.(h/2)/Ig = 2.5 Mpa. >= 0.8fr = 2.5 Mpa.Section is cracked
Elastic Cracked Section Property at Service State (Cracked, Linear Stage, approximately fc<0.45fc’)
/ b d /[ ]
‐‐ 5.7.3.4 &5.4.2.6
= As/ b.d = 1,257/[600x625.5] = 0.0033Modular Ratio, n = Es/Ec = 200,000/23,914 = 8.36k = [2n.+(n.)2]1/2‐n. = 0.2089J = 1‐k/3 =0.93fc,comp =2.M /(k∙j∙b∙d2) = 5.25 Mpa. < 0.45fc’=11.25 Mpa.
‐‐ 5.7.1.4
Reinforce Concrete Design
Positive Moment DesignService Limit State: Service ICrack Control by Distribution Reinforcement
Elastic Cracked Section Property at Service State (Cracked, Linear Stage , approximately fc<0.45fc’)A t l St i th t lActual Stress in the steelfss = M/ As.j.d = 119.8/ [12.57x0.93x0.6255] = 164 Mpa.dc = 50covering+12+[20/2] = 72 mm., h = 700 mm.In this design example used e = 0.50 (crack width 0.22mm)
s = 1+dc/{0.7.[h‐dc]} = 1+72/{0.7x[700‐72]}= 1.16
Minimum Spacing of reinforcement in the layer closest to i f l k d (0 22 )tension face to control concrete cracked (0.22mm.).
S = {123,000.e/[s.fss]}‐2.dc = [123,000x0.5/(1.16x164)]‐2x72
S = 179.3 mm.Use the bottom bar 4‐DB20 , Sprovide = 600/4 = 150 mm. ≤ 179.5 mm. O.K.
10/19/2014
12
Reinforce Concrete Design
Negative Moment DesignStrength Limit State: Strength I
Mu‐max = ‐235.1 kN.mTry to provide steel bar = 5‐DB20.A { d2/4} 5 1 571 2 Eq 5 7 3 1 2 4
Flexural Reinforcement
As‐provide = {.d2/4}x5= 1,571 mm2
1 = 0.85, b = 600 mm.c = As.fy / 0.85.fc’.b .1
= 1,571x390 / {0.85x25x600x0.85}= 56.55 mm.
a = 1.c = 0.85x67.86 = 48.1 mm.de = 700‐(50)covering ‐12‐(25/2) = 625.5 mm.Check c/de =56.55/625.5 = 0.09 ≤ 0.375 ==> Tension Controlled = 0 9
‐‐5.7.2.2
‐‐Eq 5.7.3.1.2‐4
‐‐5.5.4.2.1‐2 0.9.Mn = 0.9x1,571x390[625.5‐(48.1/2)] /1,000,000
= 331.7 kN.m > 235.1 kN.m O.K.Capacity Ratio = 235.1/331.7= 0.71
Use the Top bar are 5‐DB20
5.5.4.2.1 2
Reinforce Concrete Design
Mr is the lesser of 1.2Mcr and 1.33Mu
Modulus of rupture for cracking moment calculation
Minimum Reinforcement (Cracking Moment)
Negative Moment DesignStrength Limit State: Strength I
fr = 0.97.fc’1/2 = 0.97x251/2
= 4.85 Mpa.Sc = b.h
2/6 = 0.6x0.72/6 = 0.049 m3/m.
1.2Mcr = 1.2.Sc.fr = 1.2x0.049x4.85x1000 = 285.2 kN.m
1.33Mu = 1.33x235.1 = 312.7 kN.mMr = 285.2 kN.mUse the bottom bar are 5 DB20
‐‐ 5.4.2.6
Use the bottom bar are 5‐DB20.Mn = 331.7 kN.m > 285.2 kN.m O.K.
10/19/2014
13
Reinforce Concrete Design
Negative Moment DesignService Limit State: Service ICrack Control by Distribution Reinforcement
M‐ = ‐157.9 kN.mCheck concrete cracked at bottom fiber (Concrete tension)C ec co c ete c ac ed at botto be (Co c ete te s o )Modulus of rupture = fr = 0.63.fc’
1/2 = 3.15 Mpa. b=0.6 m., h = 0.7 m., Ig = b.h
3/12 = 0.01715 m4
fc‐tension = M.(h/2)/Ig = 3.22 Mpa. >= 0.8fr = 2.5 Mpa.Section is cracked
Elastic Cracked Section Property at Service State (Cracked, Linear Stage, approximately fc<0.45fc’)
/ b d /[ ]
‐‐ 5.7.3.4 &5.4.2.6
= As/ b.d = 1,571/[600x625.5] = 0.0042Modular Ratio, n = Es/Ec = 200,000/23,914 = 8.36k = [2n.+(n.)2]1/2‐n. = 0.23J = 1‐k/3 =0.92fc,comp =2.M /(k∙j∙b∙d2) = 6.4 Mpa. < 0.45fc’=11.25 Mpa.
‐‐ 5.7.1.4
Reinforce Concrete Design
Negative Moment DesignService Limit State: Service ICrack Control by Distribution Reinforcement
Elastic Cracked Section Property at Service State (Cracked, Linear Stage , approximately fc<0.45fc’)A t l St i th t lActual Stress in the steelfss = M/ As.j.d = 157.9/ [15.71x0.92x0.6255] = 175 Mpa.dc = 50covering+12+[20/2] = 72 mm., h = 700 mm.In this design example used e = 0.50 (crack width 0.22mm)
s = 1+dc/{0.7.[h‐dc]} = 1+72/{0.7x[700‐72]}= 1.16
Minimum Spacing of reinforcement in the layer closest to i f l k d (0 22 )tension face to control concrete cracked (0.22mm.).
S = {123,000.e/[s.fss]}‐2.dc = [123,000x0.5/(1.16x175)]‐2x72
S = 159 mm.Use the bottom bar 5‐DB20 , Sprovide = 600/5 = 120 mm. ≤ 159 mm. O.K.
10/19/2014
14
Reinforce Concrete Design
Shrinkage & Temperature Reinforcement
Reinforcement for shrinkage and temperature stresses shall be provided near to daily temperature changes and in structural mass concrete in each direction and each face.
‐‐5.10.8
Use DB16 A = 201 mm2Use DB16, As 201 mmAg = 600x700 = 420,000 mm2
As‐required = 0.0015.Ag = 630 mm2 < 1,257 mm2 O.K.233 ≤ As ≤ 1,270 mm2 /m. O.K.At near face of side pier capSrequired = Min[700/(630/201),300] = 223 mm
Use 2‐DB16
‐‐ 5.10.8‐2
Reinforce Concrete Design
Vu = 588.15 kN.dv = Max.[de‐a/2, 0.9de ,0.72h] = Max.[606.3, 563, 504]
Shear Capacity CheckStrength Limit State: Strength INominal shear resistance
‐‐ 5.8.2.9
= 606.3 mm.bv = 600 mm.v = 0.9.Vc = .0.083∙β∙f c’1/2∙bv∙dvβ = 2.0, θ = 45˚f c‘= 25 Mpa..Vc = 0.90x0.083x2.0x251/2x600x606.3/1,000
= 271.7 kN. < 588.15 kN.Transverse reinforcement is required
‐‐ Eq. 5.8.3.3‐3
‐‐5.8.3.4.1
‐‐5.5.4.2
Transverse reinforcement is required.
10/19/2014
15
Reinforce Concrete Design
Nominal shear strength provided by shear reinforcementVn = Vc + Vs + Vp
Shear Capacity CheckStrength Limit State: Strength ITransverse reinforcement
‐‐ Eq. 5.8.3.3‐1
Vn = Min.[Vu/v ,0.25fc’.bv.dv] = Min.[653.5, 2274] = 653.5 kN.
Vp = 0 kN. (for non‐prestress concrete)Vs = 653.5‐ 301.9 = 352 kN.β = 2.0 ,θ = 45˚Size of stirrup bar = DB12 (2‐leg, Av = 2x113.1 =226.2 mm2)Angle of inclination of transverse reinforcement = =90˚Spacing of shear reinforcementS = A f d Cotθ/V = 226 2x390x606 3xCot 45˚/352x1 000
‐‐5.8.3.4.1
‐‐ Eq. 5.8.3.3‐2
Sreq = Av.fy.dv.Cotθ/Vs = 226.2x390x606.3xCot 45 /352x1,000Sreq = 152 mm.Used DB12@150
Pile Cab Design
Summary of Reinforcement
5‐DB20 Main Flexural Bar
0.6m.
(Negative)
4‐DB20 Main Flexural Bar(Positive)
2‐DB16 Each Face(Shrinkage &
Temperature Steel)
0.7m.
(Positive)
DB12@150(Shear Reinforcement)
10/19/2014
16
SubstructurePile Bent Design
Load on PileBraking Force
BR1‐1=25%x[242]=60.5 kN./Lane, BR1‐2=5%x[242+9.3x10]=16.75 kN./Lane= 60.5 kN/Lane x 2 Lane. = 121 kN. [Maximum]Apply braking force 121 kN at 1.8 m. above road surface level
PLL+PDC+PDW PLL+PDC+PDW
1.80m.
BR = 121/2 = 60.5 kN
1.3 m.
4.3 m.
Mt = 60.5x3.1= 187.6 kN.m
BR = 121/2 = 60.5 kN
9 4
3.1 m.
2.0 m.
Ground level
Pile fixed point level (Assume)
Mb = 60.5x9.4= 568.7 kN.m
Braking load apply
Pile bent structural model & support configuration
Bending Moment Diagram
9.4 m.
6.3 m.
10/19/2014
17
Load Transfer to PilePile Loads ‐ Service
FORCES DC DW LL1 (Truck+Lane)Case‐1
BR WA
Axial Force (kN/Pile) 435 27 228.5 ‐ ‐
M t (L it di l)Moment (Longitudinal)
MxTop Pile (kN.m/Pile) ‐ ‐ ‐ 37.5 ‐
MxBottom Pile (kN.m/Pile) ‐ ‐ ‐ 113.7 ‐
Pile Capacity Resistance Checked
Note: In this design example not consider water load on longitudinal direction (WA)
Maximum Load = [435+27+228.5]= 690.5 kN/Pile < 700 kN ==> O.K.
Load CombinationTable 3.4.1‐1 Load Combinations and Load Factors
In this design example consider only load combination group Strength I
10/19/2014
18
Pile Loads – Strength‐I
Maximum Axial LoadPu (Strength I) = 1.25x[352+83]+1.5x[27]+1.75x[228.5] = 984.2 kNMaximum MomentMut (Strength I) = 1.75x[37.5] = 65.7 kN.mMub (Strength I) = 1.75x[113.7] = 199 kN.mMaximum ShearMaximum ShearVu (Strength I) = 1.75x[60.5/5] = 21.2 kN
Vu = 21.2 kN/Pile
Mt = 65.7 kN.m/Pile
Pu = 984.2 kN/Pile
Vu = 21.2 kN/Pile
Mb = 199 kN.m/Pile
Pu = 984.2 kN/Pile
6.3 m.
Slenderness and Second ‐Order EffectMoment magnification (Approximate method)
1.Check Column SlendernessEffective length factor, Kx = 1.0 (Assume piles are braced with top slab)Lx = 6.30 m, Ag = 0.4x0.4 = 0.16m
2, Ix = 0.4x0.43/12 = 0.0021333 m4
rx =(Ix/Ag)1/2 = 0.115 m, Kx.Lx/rx =1.0x6.3/0.115= 54.8
For members braced against side sway the effects of slenderness may be neglected where KL/r is less than 34‐12(M1/M2) = 34‐12(65.7/199) = 3030 < Kx.Lx/ rx =54.8 < 100 Second‐order effect should be considered ‐‐ 5.7.4.3
10/19/2014
19
Slenderness and Second ‐Order EffectMoment magnification (Approximate method)
2. Determine EI for use in determining Pe are the greater ofEI = {[Ec.Ig/5]+[Es.Is]}/[1+d]EI = [Ec.Ig/2.5]/[1+d]More conservative solution being
‐‐ Eq 5.7.4.3‐1
‐‐ Eq 5.7.4.3‐2
EI = [Ec.Ig/2.5]/[1+d]Ec = 23,914 Mpa., Ig = 0.4x0.4
3/12 = 0.0021333 m4
d = ratio of maximum factored permanent load moments to maximum factored total load momentMDL= 0Mtotal‐Strength I = M2s = 1.75x[113.7] = 199 kN.md = MDL/Mtotal = 0/199 = 0EI = [23,914x106x 0.0021333/2.5]/1.0 = 20,406 kN.m2
3 Determine Euler buckling load P3. Determine Euler buckling load PexPex = 2.EI/(KL)2 = 2.20,406/[1.0x6.32] = 5,078 kN4.Determine the factor momentCm = 1.0 for braced against side swayPu = 1.25x435+1.5x27+1.75x228.5 = 984.2 kNk. = 0.75 ,for concretes = 1/{1‐[Pu/k.Pe]} =1/{1‐[984.2/0.75x5,078]} = 1.35
‐‐ Eq 4.5.3.2.2b‐5
‐‐ Eq 4.5.3.2.2b‐4
Slenderness and Second ‐Order EffectMoment magnification (Approximate method)
5. 4.Determine the magnified factor momentMc= s.M2s= 1.35x199 = 268.7 kN.m ‐‐ Eq 4.5.3.2.2b‐1
Summary Design Force
Pu = 984.2 kNVu = 21.2 kNMu = 268.7 kN.m
10/19/2014
20
Pile Bent Axial Compression & Flexural Combnation Design Checked
Section Dimension400x400 mm.Concretefc’ = 25 Mpa.Reinforcement Steelfy = 400 Mpa.CoveringS = 50 mmNo of BarUsed 12‐DB28 (12‐#9)Rebar Ratio = 4.8%
Shear Capacity CheckStrength Limit State: Strength INominal shear resistance
Vu = 42.35 kN.a = As.fy / 0.85.fc’.b = 4x616x400/0.85x25x400 = 116 mm.dv = Max.[de‐a/2, 0.9de ,0.72h] = Max.[266, 291.6, 288]
‐‐ 5.8.2.9
= 291.6 mm.bv = 400 mm.v = 0.9.Vc = .0.083∙β∙f c’1/2∙bv∙dvβ = 2.0, θ = 45˚f c‘= 25 Mpa..Vc = 0.90x0.083x2.0x251/2x400x291.6/1,000
= 87.2 kN. > 42.35 kN. O.K.Transverse shear reinforcement is not required
‐‐ Eq. 5.8.3.3‐3
‐‐5.8.3.4.1
‐‐5.5.4.2
Transverse shear reinforcement is not required.Used Minimum transverse shear reinforcementDB12@300 at Typical sectionThe spacing of ties along the longitudinal axis ofthe compression member shall not exceed the leastdimension of the compression member or 300 mm.
‐‐5.10.6.3
10/19/2014
21
The transverse reinforcement for confinement at the plastic hinges shall be determined as followsThe total cross‐sectional area (Ash) of stirrup reinforcement shall be eitherA 0 30 S h [f ’/f ] {[A /A ] 1}
Ductility of ColumnTransverse Shear Reinforcement for confinement
E 5 10 11 4 ld 2Ash = 0.30.S.hc.[fc’/fyh].{[Ag/Ae]‐1}or,Ash = 0.12.S.hc.[fc’/fy ].{0.5+[1.25Pu/Ag.fc’]}where,S = vertical spacing (not exceed 100 mm.)Ae = area of column core measured to the outside of the transverse reinforcement (mm2)fc’ = compressive strength of concrete (Pa)f = yield strength of stirrup or spiral reinforcement (Pa)
Eq‐‐5.10.11.4.ld‐2
Eq‐‐5.10.11.4.ld‐3
fy = yield strength of stirrup or spiral reinforcement (Pa)Ag = gross area of column (mm2)Ash = total cross‐sectional area of stirrup reinforcement (mm2)hc =core dimension of tied column in the direction under consideration (mm.)Pu = factored axial load (MN)
Use 12 mm bar diameter (DB12, Ash = 113.14 mm2)Ag = 400x400 = 160,000 mm2
hc = 400‐2x(50)covering = 300 mmAe = 300x300 = 122,500 mm2
f ’ 25 MP
Ductility of ColumnTransverse Shear Reinforcement for confinement
fc’ = 25 MPa.fy = 400 MPa.Ash = 0.30.S.hc.[fc’/fyh].{[Ag/Ae]‐1}Srequired = Ash /{0.30.hc.[fc’/fyh].{[Ag/Ae]‐1}}
= 2x113.14/{0.3x300x[25/400]x{[160,000/122,500]‐1}= 131 mm.
DB12@125 at plastic hinge region of column
Eq‐‐5.10.11.4.ld‐2
10/19/2014
22
• Provided at the top and bottom of the column over a length not less than the greatest of the maximum cross‐sectional column dimensions, one‐sixth of the clear height of the column, or 450mmP id d h f il i il b h
Ductility of ColumnTransverse Shear Reinforcement for confinement
5.10.11.4.1
• Provided at the top of piles in pile bents over the same length as specified for columns• Provided within piles in pile bents over a length extending from 3.0 times the maximum cross sectional dimension below the calculated point of moment fixity to a distance not less than the maximum cross‐sectional dimension or450 mm above the mud line