2012116 sunil pandey iron ore

Upload: sunil-pandey

Post on 04-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 2012116 Sunil Pandey Iron Ore

    1/3

    Iron Ore company of Ontario

    IRON ORE COMPANY OF

    ONTARIO

    SUBMITTED BY,

    SUNIL PANDEYSECTION B

    2012116

    Sunil PandeySection B2012116 Page 1

  • 7/30/2019 2012116 Sunil Pandey Iron Ore

    2/3

    Iron Ore company of Ontario

    Case Synopsis:

    George Sharp, the mine superintendent (IOCO) and Tim Smith, the general

    superintendent of operations (IOCO) in 1990 were concerned about the question

    of handling loaded ore trucks during operations delay of the ore crushers at the

    mine. The IOCO operated a large open-pit iron-ore mine in Northern Ontario.Besides the mine itself, the company operated an ore-handling facility on Lake

    Superior, loading ocean-going ships, and lake freighters.

    The mine was located in a crescent shaped ore deposit. Production was

    scheduled on a year-round, 24-hour-per-day basis to produce over 46million

    tonnes of crude ore per year, yielding about 21million tonnes of high-grade

    concentrate. To accommodate this production, a concentrator was built with an

    input capacity of about 1760 cubic metres of crude ore per hour, and was

    operated at capacity at all times.

    After a blast, large electric shovels moved into a position to load diesel-powered

    trucks. These hauling units carried the waste material to a waste dump outside

    the mine, while ore was hauled to the crushers. Everyday 128,000tonnes of ore

    and 80,000tonnes of waste rock were hauled to the crushers and waste dumps

    respectively. The ore, containing 30 per cent iron, entered the crushers, where

    large rocks were reduced in size by jaw and gyratory crushers. After being

    crushed, the material passed by conveyor to the concentrator where it was

    further ground and separated into waste tailings and 66 per cent iron

    concentrate.

    Initial operations:

    When the mine began operations in 1985, Sharp's predecessor noted that trucks

    often arrived from the mine with a full load of ore only to find both crushers

    closed. Trucks then turned around and returned to the mine and dumped the ore

    beside the shovel which had originally loaded it. The entire shovel truck crew

    then moved from their ore zone to a waste zone until the crusher was re-opened.

    About 15minutes of production was lost each time a shovel changed location to

    move from an ore zone to a waste zone. Recognizing the inefficiency of this type

    of operation, the superintendent started a stockpile about 120metres from thecrushers. Loaded ore trucks dumped at the stockpile, instead of returning loaded

    to the mine when both crushers were down. It was thought to be cheaper to

    station a shovel, which would otherwise be spare at the stockpile, and move the

    ore from the stockpile to the crushers later, than to send loaded ore trucks back

    to the mine. The time taken for a loaded truck to come from a shovel in the

    mine, turn, and dump on the stockpile was effectively the same as the time

    needed to carry ore to one of the crushers, turn, and dump. Therefore, the cost

    of ore reaching the stock file was the same as the cost of ore entering the

    crushers. Time was spent reducing the stockpile during periods of blasting when

    Sunil PandeySection B2012116 Page 2

  • 7/30/2019 2012116 Sunil Pandey Iron Ore

    3/3

    Iron Ore company of Ontario

    all production trucks were moved out of the mine, and during shovel breakdown

    which freed trucks.

    Problems and Solutions:

    Sharp felt that once shovel-truck team began to produce, it was important that

    the team remain on the go. Workers in the mine might feel frustrated and lose

    enthusiasm for their work, if their cycle was periodically disrupted and also

    reduce the efficiency and productivity in the mine.

    Accountants had suggested, however, that the fuel consumption of waiting

    trucks or bulldozers would only be about 10per cent of the normal amount. Also,

    their maintenance and supplies expenses were about 20 percent of the normal

    amount. A temporary idle shovel consumed electricity at its normal rate, and

    incurred maintenance and supplies expenses at about 20 percent of normalrates. On the other hand, Sharp wanted to use the stockpile as little as possible

    because of the additional cost of re-handling ore. It had also been suggested that

    the stockpile be used for storing various grades of ore. The varying grades of ore

    could then be used for blending to maintain constant grade control of the

    finished concentrate. Such a practice was considered impractical because of the

    lag between the input of crude oil and the production of finished concentrate.

    However, the stockpile was useful for ensuring a continuous flow of ore to the

    crushers during the 30minutes each day that the mine was cleared for blasting,

    as well as during poor road conditions and shovel breakdown.

    Sharp had to evaluate the courses of action open to him. He and Smith had

    agreed that there was an optimum point at which total waiting and stockpile re-

    handling costs would be minimised and further agreed that the current rule

    failed to minimise these costs. He knew he would be called on to recommend a

    new plan to Smith.

    Sunil PandeySection B2012116 Page 3