4-1 technology development of anti-seismic structures for ... · 4-1 technology development of...
TRANSCRIPT
4-1 Technology Development of Anti-seismic Structures for
Sewer Networks Yukihiro ISHIKAWA Bureau of Sewerage, Tokyo Metropolitan Government
ABSTRUCT
Japan has experienced several major earthquakes in the past two decades: the Southern Hyogo
Earthquake (1995), the Niigata-Chuetsu Earthquake (2004) and the Great East Japan
Earthquake (2011). These earthquakes damaged many kinds of infrastructure, including sewage
facilities, and resulted in a major long-term impact on civic life and urban activities.
Almost 90 years has passed since the Great Kanto Earthquake of 1923, and there is a 70
percent chance that a shallow-focus earthquake could hit directly under Tokyo within the next
30 years.
The Tokyo Bureau of Sewerage is working to develop seismic technologies to maintain
sewerage infrastructure as well as ensure safe evacuation and toilet usability in the event of a
major earthquake.
Here, we would like to introduce our seismic retrofitting measures for the joints connecting
sewage pipes to manholes (which have shown significant damage during earthquakes) and a
trenchless seismic retrofitting technology to prevent the manhole uplifting that results from
liquefaction. We would also like to briefly introduce a new technology currently under
development that prevents sediment influx into manholes during earthquakes.
KEYWORDS: Trenchless seismic retrofitting, liquefaction countermeasures, manhole
uplift suppression, new technology
INTRODUCTION
Sewage works suffered significant damage in the Hyogo (1995), Niigata Chuetsu (2004) and
Great East Japan (2011) earthquakes. Ruptured sewer lines (Photo 1) and uplifted manholes from
liquefaction (Photo 2) made toilet facilities at evacuation sites unusable and blocked road traffic,
thereby seriously hindering post-disaster civic life and emergency restoration efforts. Final
treatment of sewage was stopped, with workers implementing stopgap measures such as the
construction of temporary settling tanks on facility grounds and in neighboring canals and, for a
limited period, carrying out only primary treatment of sewage waste.
The metropolitan Tokyo area is estimated to have a 70 percent chance of experiencing a
magnitude-7 class earthquake within the next 30 years. If a magnitude 7.3 earthquake occurred in
the northern part of Tokyo Bay, an average of 27.1 percent of sewer pipes are expected to suffer
damage. If the earthquake halted sewage functions and a major rainfall occurred, the system
would not be able to carry off rainwater, potentially wreaking enormous damage.
Earthquake measures are therefore an urgent issue and require further strengthening of efforts
to mitigate damage and accelerate recovery and restoration.
Heavy traffic in urban areas such as Tokyo makes the regulation of road lanes during
excavation difficult. Moreover, open-cut excavation for the implementation of seismic
technologies in sewer lines presents difficulties since water, gas and electric lines are also buried
under roadways.
Given these conditions, the Tokyo Bureau of Sewerage is working to develop trenchless
seismic retrofitting technologies for its sewer lines.
Plan to Seismically Strengthen the Tokyo Sewer System
As part of the Tokyo 2020 Plan announced in 2011, the metropolitan government is actively
promoting earthquake measures in its aim to create a disaster-resistant city and enhance the
metropolis’ credibility.
When selecting sewer lines on which to carry out seismic retrofitting work, the Bureau of
Sewerage gives priority to “points” of attention such as sewer lines and manholes that carry
wastewater from disaster center hospitals, schools that serve as evacuation centers, and parks that
serve as evacuation facilities.
Specifically, the Bureau has been surveying the joints connecting manholes and sewer pipes of
700 millimeters or less at 2,500 evacuation facilities to determine whether retrofitting is possible.
At the end of March 2012, 78 percent had been surveyed, with a planned completion by the end
of March 2014.
Photo 1: Ruptured connection between
manhole and sewer pipes
Photo 2: Uplifted manhole (2004
Niigata Chuetsu Earthquake)
Moreover, the Bureau is also promoting another seismic measure “point”: suppressing manhole
uplifting to ensure that emergency vehicles can pass over roads during a disaster. These
measures are also being applied to manholes on sidewalks to ensure passage to evacuation
centers and the like.
Specifically, these measures are being applied in areas at high risk for liquefaction to roads
designated as essential emergency transport routes and evacuation routes in order to mount
recovery activities during in an earthquake disaster. Over a three-year period beginning in 2008,
the Bureau implemented measures to prevent uplifting of manholes along 500 km of roads
designated at emergency transport routes. From April 2011, we have been working to implement
these same measures for manholes along the 1,500 km of roads that access these emergency
routes.
Given the danger of an earthquake directly hitting the metropolis, the Bureau will need to
extend its seismic measures in stages, expanding out from such “points” to “lines” and
“surfaces.”
Seismic strengthening of “lines,” or the actual sewer pipes, is currently being carried out as part
of reconstruction work and is by necessity a long-term effort. As such, there is need to proceed
with such “line” work—seismic retrofitting and reconstruction—in parallel.
Fig. 1. Overall image of seismic retrofitting and reconstruction in stayed-in districts
ます・取付管の耐震化老朽管きょの更生・敷設替え
地区内残留地区
マンホールの浮上抑制マンホールと管きょの
接続部の可とう化
緊急車両の通行機能を確保
* Stayed-in Districts Areas in which there is no danger of fire spreading in a disaster and for which large-scale evacuations are not required.
Designated “Stayed-in” Districts Rehabilitate or re-lay superannuated pipes
Seismically strengthen catch basins and collecting sewers
Add flexibility to manhole-sewer pipe joints
Evacuation centers, etc.
Emergency transport roads
Suppress manhole uplift
Ensure that emergency vehicles can pass
Water reclamation center
In addition to work on lines from evacuation centers, etc. it also necessary to expand work to
maintain other essential “points” such as national and city organizations responsible for disaster
prevention; police, fire and other public facilities; facilities essential to post-disaster recovery of
electricity, gas and other lifelines; major railway stations, who must deal with stranded
commuters; and convenience stores and similar places that provide services during a disaster.
“Areas” refer to seismic retrofitting of sewer systems in the designated “stayed-in” districts (Fig.
1) (areas where it is safe to remain in a disaster) of Tokyo’s disaster prevention plan, largely
those in central Tokyo and around major stations. Since basically the entire sewer system needs
to be seismically retrofitted, by increasing the priority of reconstruction work, the Bureau must
promote speedy and efficient seismic retrofitting and superannuated pipe measures.
Developing Technology for Making the Tokyo Sewer System Earthquake-Resistant
Seismic retrofitting of sewer pipes consists of three basic types of work: strengthening the pipes
themselves, strengthening the joints connecting manholes and pipes, and measures to prevent the
uplift of manholes. Tokyo Bureau of Sewerage has been carrying out joint research with a
number of private-sector enterprises to develop seismic technologies with respect to latter two
types of work, and we would like to introduce them here.
1. Development of a Technology to Strengthen the Joints Connecting Manholes and Sewer
Pipes
In the 1995 Southern Hyogo Earthquake, sewer pipes suffered damage from ruptures, ejections,
joint slippage and cracks. In particular, the damage was often seen at the joint between the
manhole and the sewer pipe and in the first pipe leading from the manhole.
The joints connecting manholes to sewer pipes were rigid and not able to absorb the difference
in the movement between the two parts in response to ground motion.
After surveying the damage in the Hyogo earthquake, the Japan Sewage Works Association
published its guidelines and commentary for seismically retrofitting sewage facilities based on
two levels (Level 1, Level 2) of ground motion and indicated new thinking about
seismic-resistant design.
Using these guidelines, the Tokyo Bureau of Sewerage began collaborative research with
private enterprises from 1998 to develop a seismic technology for the joints connecting manholes
and sewer pipes.
(1) Request to Develop a Seismic Retrofitting Method for Existing Manholes
1) Background to the Request
Given the damage to sewage facilities in the 1995 Southern Hyogo Earthquake, the Tokyo
Bureau of Sewerage made a request to private-sector enterprises in 1998 to develop seismic
technolo
The fo
After ve
method
hospital
2) Ov
In this
flexibili
By imp
resistanc
3) Me
This m
special d
manhole
conditio
the joint
In addi
statistica
Fig. 2. C
ogy for join
ollowing yea
erifying the
in existing
ls.
verview of M
method, the
ity for seism
proving flex
ce even whe
ethod Char
method uses
device, cutt
e. This work
ons around t
t elastic stru
ition, this m
ally every 5
Conceptual
nts connectin
ar, three com
technology
pipelines th
Method
e joint conn
mic resistanc
xibility of th
en the pipe
racteristics
a special cu
ing through
k may call f
the pipe. Th
ucture. (Fig.
method is de
500 to 1,000
l schematic
ng manholes
mpanies dev
under actua
hat handle w
necting exist
ce without e
he joint, this
is refracted
and Scope
utting device
h the manho
for water sto
he cut chann
. 2, 3)
signed to de
0 years.
c for seismic
s and sewer
veloped a se
al condition
wastewater f
ting manhol
excavation o
s technology
or ejected d
e of Applica
e along the
le to the gro
oppage for s
nel is filled w
eal with Lev
c retrofittin
r pipes.
ismic metho
ns, from 200
from evacua
les and sewe
of the site.
y prevents p
due to groun
ation
outside diam
ound and sep
soil stabiliza
with an elast
vel 2 ground
ng of existin
od for use in
00 the Burea
ation centers
er pipes is im
pipe damage
nd motion.
meter of sew
parating the
ation, depen
tic polyuret
d motion, w
ng manhole
n existing m
au began usi
s and disaste
mproved by
e and ensure
wer pipe usi
e pipe from
nding on the
thane sealan
which occurs
es
manholes.
ing the
er
y adding
es seismic
ing a
the
e
nt to give
s
Fig. 3. Conceptual schematic for seismic retrofitting of existing manholes
The scope of application is as follows:
1) Pipe types: clay, reinforced concrete, rigid PVC pipe, fiber-reinforced plastic mortar pipe
2) Existing pipe size: inside diameter of 250‒700mm
3) Manhole diameter: inside diameter of at least 900mm
4) Thickness of manhole wall: 300mm or less
5) Manhole cover: 600mm or more
6) Manhole depth: 5m or less
(2) Use of a Method to Seismically Retrofit Joints in Rehabilitated Pipes at Manholes
1) Decision on the Method to Be Used
There is a large concentration of superannuated pipes in central Tokyo that have well exceeded
their statutory 50 years of useful life and, due to advancements in urbanization and more
sophisticated lifestyles, many of these pipes have insufficient flow capacity for handling
wastewater volumes and increased rainwater runoff. To address this problem, measures to deal
with superannuation are required.
In the 2004 Niigata Chuetsu Earthquake, sewers were unusable due to large-scale damage to
sewage lines and there was a shortage of toilet facilities at evacuation centers, reiterating the
importance of sewers as a lifeline.
With the aim of seismically retrofitting the joints between manholes and rehabilitated sewer
lines, in 2009 we assessed a method developed in the private sector and decided to implement it
in our facilities.
2) Overview of Method
This method applies to the joints between manholes and sewer lines for rehabilitation, adding
seismic resistance for pipe ejection, projection and refraction by giving a more flexible structure
[Top View] [Side View]
Elastic sealant
Backup material
Stainless steel collar
Shock-absorbing rubber block
Seal of 30 mm or more Backup material
Elastic sealant
Cut width of 15 mm or more
Cut width of 10 mm or more
Existing conduit
Stainless steel collar
Shock-absorbing rubber block
using a
earthqua
non-sup
After d
then reh
manhole
3)C
This is
into exis
waterpro
resin. (F
The sc
1) Pi
2) Pi
3) Pi
4) M
5) Th
6) Co
7) M
trenchless m
ake resistan
perannuated
deploying th
habilitating t
e.
Characterist
s a trenchles
sting pipe (w
oof and seis
Figure 4)
cope of appl
ipe type: rei
ipe shape: c
ipe diameter
Manhole shap
hickness of
over diamet
Manhole dept
method prio
nce against g
pipes.
his technolo
the pipes all
tics and Sco
ss method th
wall only) w
smic-resista
ication is as
inforced con
ircular
r: Inside dia
pe: Inside di
manhole w
ter:Inside
th: 5 meters
r to the reha
ground moti
ogy in the jo
lows seismi
ope of App
hat uses spec
without cutti
ant rubber rin
s follows:。
ncrete, clay
ameter 250‒
iameter of 9
all: 200‒300
diameter of
s or less
abilitation w
ion in the sa
ints of upstr
ic strengthen
licability
cial cutting
ing through
ng that is se
‒400mm
900m or mo
0mm
f 600mm or
work. Moreo
ame way as
ream and do
ning of both
equipment
to the grou
ealed in plac
ore
more
over, this me
seismic retr
ownstream p
h the pipe an
from inside
und. The cut
ce with an e
ethod aims
rofitting of
pipes in man
nd the joint
e the manhol
t area is fitte
lastic wet ep
to ensure
nholes
at the
le to cut
ed with a
poxy
(3)Deve
1) Ba
We hav
showed
Howeve
location
large-di
private-
large-di
2) Me
Our se
earthqua
the joint
(Fig. 5)
This m
the man
cut in a
Moreov
shut off
3) Pu
To esta
followin
elopment of
ackground
ve carried o
a comparat
er, in order t
ns and the pi
ameter pipe
sector comp
ameter pipe
ethod Over
eismic retrof
ake—the jo
t, then fillin
method use
nhole, thereb
circumferen
ver, since the
f water to ke
urpose of R
ablish this m
ng five resea
f a Seismic
out trenchles
tively highe
to strengthe
ipes leading
es of 800mm
panies in 20
es.
rview
fitting metho
int connecti
ng the space
s a dedicate
by avoiding
ntial directio
ere is no nee
eep the grou
Research an
method, we
arch goals:
Retrofittin
ss seismic re
r level of da
en the pipes
g to water re
m or more. T
010, as there
od for large
ing the pipe
with a seism
ed cutting de
the need to
on. There is
ed to cut thr
und stabilize
d Scope of
are moving
ng Method f
etrofitting o
amage in the
connected t
eclamation c
The Bureau
e were no ex
e-diameter p
with a man
mic-resistan
evice in the
o drill throug
s no need to
rough to the
ed.
Application
forward wi
for Large-d
on smaller p
e 1995 Sout
to evacuatio
centers, it is
of Sewerag
xisting trenc
pipe address
nhole—by in
nt material t
manhole to
gh ground, a
break the in
e surroundin
n
ith technolo
diameter Pi
ipes of 700m
thern Hyogo
on centers an
necessary t
ge began join
chless metho
es the weak
nducing a h
to strengthen
cut into the
and removes
nvert with th
ng ground, th
gy developm
ipes
mm or less,
o Earthquak
nd other life
to seismical
nt research w
ods to retrof
kest point in
airline crack
n against sh
e pipe wall o
s a three-dim
his method.
here is no n
ment with th
which
ke.
eline
lly retrofit
with four
fit
n an
k along
haking.
or part of
mensional
need for to
he
1) D
2) D
3) Se
4) V
5) En
m
The sc
1) Pi
2) Pi
3) D
4) M
5) W
6) M
2. Deve
(1) The
For san
prone to
pore wa
effective
specific
gravity
Existin
compac
impleme
private-
with tren
Photo
etermine an
evelop and
elect durabl
alidate seism
nsure constr
manholes wit
cope of appl
ipe type: rei
ipe shape: c
Diameter: int
Manhole shap
Wall thickne
Manhole dep
lopment of
Principle b
ndy soil or i
o subsidence
ater, leading
e stress and
gravity tha
due to their
ng counterm
ting or grou
ent in metro
sector comp
nchless met
o 3: Cutting
n appropriate
carry out a
e antiseismi
mic perform
ruction cons
th 600mm c
ication is as
inforced con
circular
ternal diame
pe: internal
ss: 250-300
pth: within 1
f an Uplift S
behind Man
insufficientl
e in an earth
g to an increa
d muddify. T
an muddy wa
hollow inte
measures inc
und improve
opolitan sett
panies since
thods.
g
e antiseismi
performanc
ic materials
mance for Le
straints are m
overs
s follows:
ncrete
eter 800mm
diameter 12
0mm
10m
Suppression
nhole Uplif
ly compacte
hquake. If gr
ase in pore
This is the pr
ater will flo
erior) will ri
clude backfi
ement. Thes
tings. The B
e 2005 to de
Photo 4seismic-
ic structure
ce evaluation
evel 2 seism
met, such as
m‒2000mm
200‒2200m
n Method f
fts and Exis
ed (loose) so
roundwater
water pressu
rocess of liq
oat, manhole
ise up.
lling with im
se are open-
Bureau has b
evelop techn
4: Installatio-resistant m
n of the cutt
mic motion
s being able
mm
for Existing
sting Measu
oils, the soil
is present, t
ure in which
quefaction.
es (which ha
mproved soi
cut methods
been carryin
nologies that
on of materials
ting device
e to bring the
g Manholes
ures
l particle ske
the soil cann
h soil partic
Since anyth
ave a light a
il followed
s and theref
ng out joint r
t can be safe
Photo 5: Cseismic ret
e cutting de
s
eleton is fra
not sufficien
cles lose the
hing with a h
apparent spe
by sufficien
fore difficult
research wit
fely impleme
Completiontrofitting
evice into
agile and
ntly drain
ir
higher
ecific
nt
t to
th three
ented
n of
(2) Target Values
The uplifted manholes resulting from large-scale earthquakes in Japan in recent years have
interfered with road traffic such as the passing of emergency vehicles. The Japan Sewage Works
Association’s 2006 Earthquake Measures Manual provides guideline criteria for emergency
measures with respect to passage interference (Table 1).
On the other hand, it is said that the maximum allowable height difference for the passage of
traffic is 15 cm. At present, it is not possible to calculate the amount of subsidence that would
occur from liquefaction, but if subsidence is estimated at 5 cm, then manhole uplift would need
to be kept to below 10 cm to stay with the 15 cm limit. We therefore aimed to achieve manhole
uplift of less than 10 cm.
In addition, we also set a development goal of working from inside the manhole to remove the
need for excavation, to be able to restore traffic as early as possible, and to create a structure that
would not interfere with operations and maintenance once implemented.
Table 1: Classification of degree of damage (excerpt)
Facility Survey topic Level of damage
Roads
Height
difference
between road
and manhole
Light Medium Heavy
Feel bumps when
passing over in a
vehicle (Difference
of 3cm or less)
Interferes with
operation of vehicle
(3cm-10cm)
Vehicles unable
to pass (more
than 10cm)
(3) Overview of Method
In this method, a dissipation valve is installed from the inside wall of the manhole. When pore
water pressure increases in the area around the manhole, dissipation valves release the pressure
by ejecting a pressure-sensitive plate, allowing the pore water to be released into the manhole
and preventing manhole uplift. (Fig. 6, 7)
This technology is not affected by the size, depth or shape of existing manholes and allows for
the selection of the best position and optimal number of valves. An installed valve consists of the
valve socket, a mesh screen to prevent sediment inflow and a pressure-sensitive plate. When the
pressure-sensitive plate is exposed to pore pressure water above a certain level, the plate is
ejected, which allows water to flow into the manhole to dissipate pressure. Installation work uses
a trenchless method and a specialized drilling device that stops just before penetrating through
the manhole wall. The dissipation valve is press-fitted into the manhole and the space between
the dissipation valve and the drilled space is filled.
A New E
The M
At the s
sewer l
surround
delay ri
sedimen
In the
allowed
2012 wi
due to s
Earthquak
March 11, 20
same time, m
lines, it inh
ding area. S
isk in earth
nt from flow
areas of To
d sediment in
ith the aim
hifting from
ke Resistanc
11 Great Ea
manhole blo
hibits flow
Sediment rem
hquake recov
wing into sew
okyo where
nflow. We b
of developi
m earthquak
ce Technolo
ast Japan Ea
ocks shifted
and can r
moval is als
very. There
wage lines.
e liquefactio
began joint r
ing a techno
e ground m
ogy
arthquake ca
d and allowe
result in su
so a time-co
efore, there
on occurred
research wi
ology to pre
otion.
aused liquef
ed sediment
unken roads
onsuming an
is pressing
on March
ith four priv
event sedim
faction in ce
t inflow. W
s, which se
nd costly eff
g need to ta
11, manhol
vate-sector c
ment inflow f
ertain parts o
When sedime
eriously aff
ffort and rep
ake steps to
le joints shi
companies f
from manho
of Tokyo.
ent enters
ffects the
presents a
o prevent
ifted and
from July
ole joints
(1) Met
Sedime
inflow i
The se
methods
(2) Purp
To es
followi
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
thod Overv
ent inflow
into the sew
ediment infl
s by followi
pose of Res
stablish this
ing five rese
Confirm th
Confirm th
Confirm th
Confirm th
Confirm in
view
sheets are i
wer system an
low sheet is
ing ground m
search
method, we
earch goals:
he strength a
he water-tig
he strength a
he sheet’s ab
nstallability
installed on
nd suppress
s flexible an
motion and
e are moving
:
and durabili
ghtness of th
and durabili
bility to kee
and post-in
n the joints
s effects on t
nd works in
preventing
g forward w
ity of the se
he sediment
ity of the sh
ep up with d
nstallation qu
of existing
the surround
the same w
the inflow o
with technol
diment inflo
inflow shee
heet adhesiv
displacemen
uality
manholes t
ding soil fro
way as other
of sediment
ogy develop
ow sheet
et
e
nt from grou
to occlude s
om sedimen
r seismic re
t into a manh
pment with
und motion
sediment
nt inflow.
trofitting
hole.
the
CONCLUSIONS
The Great East Japan Earthquake of March 11, 2011 produced shaking in Tokyo of Upper 5
(Japanese Seismic Intensity Scale) and liquefaction. Post-quake surveys focused on districts
where liquefaction occurred were able to confirm that the sewer systems that had undergone
seismic retrofitting had no major damage and were able to maintain flow.
To contribute widely to work for making earthquake-resistant sewerage works, we will
continue to expand the scope of implementation for seismic technologies and aim to establish
simple construction methods adapted to site conditions, as well as promote the development of
new technologies in needed areas.
REFERENCE
1. 2010 Management Plan, Metropolitan Tokyo Bureau of Sewerage (published February2010)
2. 2010 Technology Development and Promotion Plan, Metropolitan Tokyo Bureau of Sewerage
(published January 2011)
3. 46th Sewage Research Conference (2009), “Development of a Seismic Resistance Method for
the Joints of a Rehabilitated Manhole (Taishin Ippatsu-kun),” Tomohiro Hanahara, Yuji
Imasaki, pp. 158-160 (Japanese)
4. 48th Sewage Research Conference (2011), “Seismic Resistance Work for Sewer Lines
(Trenchless Method to Control Uplift of Manholes),” Hidetaka Takazawa, pp. 109-111
(Japanese)
5. 48th Sewage Research Conference (2011), “Method to Strengthen Seismic Resistance in
Existing Large-diameter Pipes,” Yukihiro Ishikawa, Kenzo Sato, Shohei Iwasaki, Tsutomu
Tanaka, Kohei Nakatani, pp. 112-114 (Japanese)