a low power tunable gm–c filter based on double cmos inverters in 0.35 μm
TRANSCRIPT
A low power tunable Gm–C filter based on double CMOSinverters in 0.35 lm
Abbas Pirmohammadi • Mohammad Hossein Zarifi
Received: 11 May 2011 / Revised: 5 July 2011 / Accepted: 9 July 2011 / Published online: 21 July 2011
� Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
Abstract In this article, an inverter based transconductor
using double CMOS pair is proposed for implementation of
a second order lowpass Gm–C Filter. The proposed oper-
ational transconductance amplifier (OTA) and biquad filter
are designed using standard 0.35 lm CMOS technology.
Simulation results demonstrate the central frequency tun-
ability from 10 kHz to 2.8 MHz which is suitable for the
wireless specifications of Bluetooth (650 kHz), CDMA
2000 (700 kHz) and Wideband CDMA (2.2 MHz) appli-
cations. The power consumption of the filter is 445 nW and
178 lW at 10 kHz and 2.8 MHz from 3.3 V supply volt-
age, respectively. The active area occupied by the designed
filter on the silicon is 215 9 720 lm2. The proposed
approach guarantees the upper bound on THD to be
-40 dB for 300 mVpp signal swing. Employing the double
CMOS pair in the inverters causes PSRR to reach 68.6 dB
which is higher than similar works.
Keywords Inverter � Double inverter CMOS pair �Gm–C filter and OTA
1 Introduction
Continuous-time filters are quite suited for applications with
moderate speed and low power requirements. Traditionally,
continuous time complementary metal oxide semiconductor
(CMOS) filters with Gm–C architecture have been designed
with MOS transistors operating in strong inversion region
when the interest bandwidth is of the order of several tens of
MHz. A number of architectures have been proposed in the
literature for implementing the transconductor.
A Gm–C bandpass filter of the OTA based on CMOS
inverters with a tuning range of 2.25–3.3 MHz is achieved
in [1], which does not have any internal node and results in
large bandwidth. However, for realizing tunable filters, this
scheme requires the power supply voltage to be varied.
This is not suitable for low voltage applications and results
in poor power supply rejection ratio (PSRR) [1]. To solve
this problem, an OTA Based on FGMOS inverters imple-
mentation is proposed in [2]. The proposed OTA in [1]
requires two voltage sources, one for the filter core and the
other for tuning circuitry.
A 260 MHz continuous-time 5th-order Gm–C biquad low-
pass filter with an automatic tuning circuit has been reported
in [3] Variable MOS capacitances and Digital Controlled
Capacitance Array are two tuning techniques that have been
employed. Otin et al. [4] introduced a programmable 4th
order Gm–C filter with automatically tunable structure.
Quality factor has been improved while other parameters kept
constant. Lo et al. [5] presented a continuous-time analog
filter and achieved a linear structure using flipped-voltage
follower. The active resistor used in the strong inversion
region to achieve the transconductance tuning. Ezzati et al.
implements an adaptive tuning system in Gm–C continuous
time (CT) filter. Reported tuning system is able to tune both
central frequency and quality factor simultaneously [6].
A. Pirmohammadi
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
Ahar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahar, Iran
M. H. Zarifi (&)
Nano and Bio Electronics Lab. (NBEL),
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,
Tabriz, Iran
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Analog Integr Circ Sig Process (2012) 71:473–479
DOI 10.1007/s10470-011-9710-x
In this work, we used double CMOS pair transistors,
operated in sub threshold region, the second isolated volt-
age source for tuning circuit will no longer required.
However, In addition to this, the operation in sub threshold
region can also result in lower power dissipation. Further-
more, the ratio of gain to DC power consumption of the
transconductor operated in subthreshold region is higher
than that operated in strong inversion region, since in sub-
threshold region; drain current has an exponential depen-
dency to the gate-source voltage. By increasing the width of
the transistors operating in subthreshold, the high gain can
still be maintained, while DC power consumption is sub-
stantially reduced. The Gm–C filter has been designed and
simulated in a standard 2P3M 0.35-lm CMOS technology.
2 Proposed structure
2.1 OTA structure
Figure 1 shows the proposed topology derivates from [1].
The operational OTA shown in Fig. 1, is denoted as Gm
block. These Gm blocks are constructed using double
CMOS pair [7] shown in Fig. 2 and the latter is referred to
as gm cell. The class AB OTA in Fig. 1 needs no extra
circuitry to control the DC output value; due to the node A
provides a DC common mode voltage about VDD/2 at node
OUT? and OUT-. The voltage VA and equivalent resis-
tance RA at node A, equal to VA = (VIN??VIN-)/2 and
RA = 1/2gm respectively. The output current at node
OUT?, is the sum of the output currents provided by
inverters Inv3 and Inv8, hence,
IOUTþ ¼ �gm VIN�ð Þ þ gm VINþ þ VIN�ð Þ2
¼ gm VINþ � VIN�ð Þ2
ð1Þ
Designed OTA is able to operate in both voltage and
current mode. Also, by providing the better frequency
performance, lower common mode transconductance gain
and better linearity can be used as alternative design of
Nauta OTA [8–9]. To avoid employing separate supply
voltage, double CMOS inverters are replaced in the CMOS
inverter. This inverter has two inputs one is using for signal
processing (Vin) and the other input uses for tuning of the
inverter (Vg1, Vg4) (Fig. 2).
The double CMOS pair is constructed using the CMOS
pair consisting of two transistors as shown in Fig. 3.
Assume that both transistors operate in weak inversion
region(subthreshold), the current ID for single PMOS/
NMOS transistor can be driven as (2), [10],
ID¼2nkU2T exp
VGB�VT0
nUT
� �exp
�VSB
UT
� ��exp
�VDB
UT
� �� �
ð2Þ
where ‘n’ is sub threshold slope factor, l’ is mobility,
‘Cox’ is the oxide capacitance of the transistor, b = lCox
is process gain factor and transconductance parameter
k = b(W/L). The thermal voltage ‘UT’ is 25.9 mV at room
temperature, VGB, VSB, VDB are gate, source, drain
voltages according to the bulk voltage respectively, VT0
Fig. 1 Double CMOS pair
based Gm block
Fig. 2 Double CMOS pair
474 Analog Integr Circ Sig Process (2012) 71:473–479
123
is the threshold voltage when VSB is Zero. When
VDB [ 5 UT and VSB = 0, an approximate expression of
ID for single transistor is given by (3).
ID ¼ 2nkU2T exp
VGS � VT0
nUT
� �ð3Þ
The current I1 and I2 of the double CMOS pair shown in
Fig. 2 are given by (4) and (5) respectively
I1 ¼ 2keff nU2T exp
VGSeq1 � Vteq1
nUT
� �ð4Þ
I2 ¼ 2keff U2T exp
VGSeq2 � Vteq2
nUT
� �ð5Þ
where, 1ffiffiffiffiffiffiKeff
p ¼ 1ffiffiffiffiKn
p þ 1ffiffiffiffiKp
p ; VGSeq1 ¼ VG1 � Vi; VGSeq2 ¼
Vi þ VG4 and Vteq1 ¼ Vtn1 þ Vtp2
�� ��; Vteq2 ¼ Vtn3 þ Vtp4
�� ��.The double CMOS pair [7], acts as a transconductance cell.
VGSeq1 is the equivalent gate to source voltage between
transistors M1, M2 and VGSeq2 is the equivalent gate to
source voltage between transistors M3, M4 (Fig. 2). all of
the MOS devices are operating in the weak inversion
saturation region and neglecting the channel length
modulation, the output current can be expressed as,
ID1 ¼ I1 � I2 ¼ �2keff nU2T
�exp
VGSeq1 � Vteq1
nUT
� �
� expVGSeq2 � Vteq2
nUT
� ��ð6Þ
Assuming that the n-well process is used, the P-MOS
transistors can have their bulks connected to their own
source terminals and this eliminates the body effect. The
bulks of M1 and M3 should be connected to the most
negative supply (Gnd), resulting in a rise in threshold
voltage. This bulk effect causes the relationship between V
and I to be non-linear. However, when the CMOS pair is
used in Barthelemy’s structure [1], the terms involving the
even powers of input signal get cancelled due to
differential circuit. The terms involving odd powers of
input signal will remain. ID1 and ID2 are the currents
coming out of Inv7 and Inv8 (Fig. 1) respectively.
The differential current coming out of the Gm cell
Io = ID1 - ID2 is given by
IO ¼ �4keff nU2T
�exp
VGSeq1 � Vteq1
nUT
� �
� expVGSeq2 � Vteq2
nUT
� ��ð7Þ
and Gm1 can be derived by taking partial derivative of (7)
vs. VGSeq and is given by
Gm1 ¼ID1
nUTð8Þ
Thus the Gm can be varied by varying the bias voltage VG1,
VG4 and the aspect ratio of the MOS transistors. In order to
ensure that all transistors in gm cell remain in the weak
inversion saturation region, the input voltage Vi and bias
voltage VG must satisfy the inequalities given as
VG1 � Vteq1�Vi�VG4 þ Vteq2 ð9Þ
VG1 should be lesser than or equal to Vdd and VG4 should
be greater than or equal to Gnd.
3 Filter design
The cascade connection of the first—and second—order
filters is a common approach for implementation of high
order filters. For this reason, the performance of the pro-
posed OTA has been evaluated by means of the second-
order filter. The scheme of this filter is shown in Fig. 4. The
transfer function of the lowpass and bandpass filter can be
drive from (10) and (11), respectively:
Hlp sð Þ ¼ Volp sð ÞVi sð Þ
� �¼
gm1gm2
C1C2
s2 þ gm3
C1sþ gm2gm4
C1C2
ð10Þ
Hbp sð Þ ¼ Vobp sð ÞVi sð Þ
� �¼
gm1
C1s
s2 þ gm3
C1sþ gm2gm4
C1C2
ð11Þ
where gmi (i = 1 to 4) and Ci (i = 1 to 2) represent the
transconductance of the ith transconductor and integrating
Fig. 4 Schematic of Gm–C biquad
Fig. 3 CMOS pair
Analog Integr Circ Sig Process (2012) 71:473–479 475
123
capacitor of the ith capacitor in Fig. 4, respectively.
Therefore, the expressions of the gain, f0 and Q are:
Hlp 0ð Þ ¼ gm1
gm4
ð12Þ
Hbp x0ð Þ ¼ gm1
gm3
ð13Þ
f0 ¼1
2p
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffigm2gm4
C1C2
rð14Þ
Q ¼ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffigm2gm4
g2m3
C1
C2
sð15Þ
The biquad filter can be designed by using of
Eqs. 12–15 and by varying the Vg1 and Vg4, we can change
the cut off frequency of discussed filter. In tunable con-
tinuous time filters, the center frequency and the quality
factor of the filter can be tuned by varying Gm, which in
turn is controlled by changing either the bias current or the
device dimensions. From (14), the center frequency of the
filter can be varied either by the constant-C or constant-Gm
method. In constant-C technique, the load capacitance is
maintained constant and the value of Gm is changed to alter
the centre frequency of the filter. In constant-Gm technique,
Gm is kept constant and the value of load capacitance is
changed to alter the centre frequency of the filter. In this
article, constant-C approach is used for tunable filter
realizations.
4 Results and discussion
The proposed OTA is implemented in standard 2P3M
0.35 lm CMOS technology with 3.3 V supply voltage.
Simulation results demonstrate total power consumption of
445 nW at 10 kHz and 178 lW at 2.8 MHz. Post-layout
simulation is presented in this section. Figure 5 shows AC
analysis for the proposed OTA. The differential gain of the
OTA is 29.3 dB, its phase margin is 82.8 degree and the
unity gain frequency is 28.97 MHz.
The DC V–I characteristics of the OTA (Iod vs. Vid) for
different bias voltages (Vg1, Vg4) of the double CMOS
pair are presented in Fig. 6. This figure indicates that the
output current is linearly proportional to differential
voltage, up to ±200 mV. The simulated transconductance
for this OTA varies from 49.6 nS to 12.5 lS. The line-
arity of the proposed OTA was evaluated with the total
harmonic distortion (THD), applying 300 mVP-P signal as
an input signal which demonstrates -40 dB as related
THD.
Figure 7, shows the power supply rejection ration
(PSRR) for the OTA for z B 0.5 pF (z is the output
capacitance). PSRR characteristics are obtained with
100 mV ripple on Vdd. Simulation clearly shows that this
OTA exhibits a good PSRR with total rejection of
68.6 dB.
Furthermore, in order to evaluate the selected trans-
conductance function, a biquad filter in the same technol-
ogy at 3.3 V supply voltage (Fig. 4) with a tuning range of
Fig. 7 Power supply rejection (PSRR) vs. frequency for z B 0.5 pF
Fig. 5 AC analysis of the designed OTA
Fig. 6 DC V–I characteristics of the proposed OTA
476 Analog Integr Circ Sig Process (2012) 71:473–479
123
10 kHz–2.8 MHz was designed and simulated, that has
suitable for low power application. Values of capacitors C1
and C2 were set to 2 and 1 pF. From Fig. 8, it can be
observed that the cut off frequency can be tuned from
10 kHz to 2.8 MHz.
The filter performance for typical, slow–slow, fast–fast,
slow–fast, and fast–slow of NMOS and PMOS transistors
parameters for the 0.35 lm-CMOS process has been
demonstrated in Fig. 9.
Temperature variation has strong effect on the transfer-
function of the designed filter and tuning is inevitable for
temperature-variation compensation (Fig. 10).
Cadence has been used to draw the Layout of the
designed filter which is presented in Fig. 11. This filter
consumes 215 9 720 lm2 of silicon active area.
The transistor dimensions (width and length) of Fig. 2
are presented in Table 1.
The performance of the proposed OTA and comparison
with previous work is summarized in Table 2.
The designed filter is compared to the other filters and
results are presented in Table 3.
5 Conclusion
This article presents a new OTA, based on double CMOS
pair which is implemented in standard 0.35 lm CMOS
process. This OTA has a unity gain frequency of
28.97 MHz, open loop DC gain of 29.3 dB and phase
margin of 82.8 degree. Using inverters with double
CMOS pair in subthreshold region, causes the power
consumption of the OTA to be very low, that is about
44.53 lW. THD of the proposed OTA is equal to
-40 dB with 300 mVP-P signal swing. The PSRR of
designed OTA is reached to 68.6 dB which is higher than
similar works. The designed low pass filter have fre-
quency tuning from 10 kHz to 2.8 MHz which Suitable
for the wireless specifications of Bluetooth (650 kHz),
CDMA2000 (700 kHz) and Wideband CDMA (2.2 MHz)
applications. The designed filter has maximum power
consumption of 178 lW.
Table 1 Dimensions of transistors for Double CMOS pair
Transistor Length of
Transistor (lm)
Width of
Transistor (lm)
M1 0.7 14
M2 0.7 45
M3 0.7 1.75
M4 0.7 2
Fig. 8 Gm–C filter f0 tunability for the low-pass responses
Fig. 10 Filter transfer function for different temperatures
Fig. 9 Process corners effect on filter transfer function
Fig. 11 Layout view of the Biquad filter
Analog Integr Circ Sig Process (2012) 71:473–479 477
123
References
1. Barthelemy, H., Meill, S., Gaubert, J., Dehaese, N., & Bourdel, S.
(2008). OTA based on CMOS inverter and application in the
design of tunable bandpass filter. Analog Integrated Circuits andSignal Processing, 57, 169–178.
2. Sobhi, J., Koozhkanani, Z. D., & Rahin, A. B. (2010). A low
voltage and low power programmable continuous-time filter
based on FGMOS inverters. In International Conference onCircuit and Signal Processing (ICCSP 2010), Shanghai, China,
25–26 Dec 2010.
3. Fan, J., Li, W., Li, N., & Ren, J. (2008). A 260 MHz 5-order
Gm–C biquad low-pass filter with wide frequency tuning range. In
IEEE Conference 2008, Beijin, pp. 1617–1620.
4. Otin, A., Celma, S., & Aldea, C. (2007). A 40–200 MHz pro-
grammable 4th-order Gm–C filter with auto-tuning system. In
IEEE Conference 2007, Muenchen, Germany, pp. 214–217.
5. Lo, T.-Y., Kao, C.-S., & Hung, C.-C. (2009). A Gm–C continu-
ous-time analog filter for IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n wireless LANs.
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 58, 197–
204.
6. Ezzati, N., & Abdollahzadeh, S. (2010). High speed and silicon-
saving adaptive tuning system for high frequency Gm-C filters.
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 65, 97–103.
7. Park, C. S., & Schaumann, R. (1986). A high-frequency CMOS
linear transconductance element. IEEE Transactions on Circuitsand Systems, 33, 1132–1137. doi:10.1109/TCS.1986.1085859.
8. Nauta, B. (1992). A CMOS transconductance-C filter technique
for very high frequencies. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits,27(2), 142–153.
9. Nauta, B., & Seevinck, E. (1989). Linear CMOS transconduc-
tance element for VHF filters. Electronics Letter, 25, 448–450.
10. Tsividis, Y. (1995). Mixed analog digital VLSI devices andtechnology (p. 66). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Table 2 Simulated
performance of the proposed
OTA and comparison
Parameters [1] [2] This work
CMOS inverter FGMOS inverter Double CMOS pair
Technology 0.35-lm MOS 0.35-lm CMOS 0.35-lm CMOS
Supply voltage (V) 2.5 1.0 3.3
Open loop DC gain (dB) 31.3 27 29.3
GBW 3.56 GHz 207 MHz 28.97 MHz
Phase margin (�) 77 91 82.8
CMRR@10 kHz – 27.34 dB 35.19 dB
PSRR 37.45 dB – 68.6 dB
Output voltage swing 2.27 (50–950) mV 0.88 V
THD @500mVP-P
-46 dB
@300mVP-P
-50 dB
@300mVP-P
-40 dB
Power consumption (lW) 800 25 44.53
Table 3 Simulated
performance of the Gm–C
biquad and comparison
Parameters [1] [2] This work
CMOS inverter FGMOS inverter Double CMOS pair
Technology 0.35-lm CMOS 0.35-lm CMOS 0.35-lm CMOS
Supply voltage (V) 2.5 1.0 3.3
Power consumption 3.99 mW 80 lW 178 lW
Frequency tuning 10 MHz 100 kHz–1 MHz 10 kHz–2.8 MHz
Tuning range – 10 [200
Auto tuning No No No
Active area – – 0.16 mm2
THD – @Vpp \ 0.4 V
\-38 dB
@Vpp \ 300 mV
-40 dB
Input referred noise – – 113 nV/sqrt(Hz)
Filter order Biquad Biquad Biquad
478 Analog Integr Circ Sig Process (2012) 71:473–479
123
Abbas Pirmohammadi was
born in Tabriz, Iran, in 1981. He
received the BS degree in
Electrical and Electronics engi-
neering from Tabriz Azad Uni-
versity, Tabriz, Iran, in 2005.
He is working as Instrument and
Control expert in the Iranian
offshore oil company from 2005
to now. He is currently working
toward the MS degree at the
Ahar Azad University. His cur-
rent research interests include
Low power and high-frequency
filters.
Mohammad Hossein Zarifiwas born in 1982. He received
the BS, MS and PhD degree in
electrical engineering from
University of Tabriz, Tabriz,
Iran, in 2004, 2006, 2009
respectively. He is now an
assistant professor of Electrical
Engineering at Islamic Azad
University Science and
Research branch and head of
Electronics and Communication
Department. His research inter-
ests include design of high-
speed and low-power analog
circuits, analog-to-digital converters, and low-power analog VLSI and
A/D systems for biomedical applications. Dr. Zarifi is a member of
the IEEE Solid-State Circuits Society, the IEEE Engineering in
Medicine and Biology Society, and the IEEE Circuits and Systems
Society. Dr. Zarifi holds more than 30 international journal and
conference publications.
Analog Integr Circ Sig Process (2012) 71:473–479 479
123