1

Application of collaborate and game-base theory of cosmetic chemistry in the Facebook platform

Dr. Zangyuan Own

Providence University, Taiwan

zyown@pu.edu.tw

2

Introduction

Normal E-Learning

By its own No interaction No discussion Lost interest

3

Facebook

「 New Feeds 」→ Immediate notice (Mason,2006)

Discussion wall → share text 、 picture 、 link 、 video 、 questionnaire

4

Facebook in chemistry education Increasing learning effect Inference of difference of student’s

character Learner’s opinion with Facebook study

Research purpose

5

1. Is there are any learning effect difference in 「 Facebook cooperation gaming system 」 and 「 Normal e-learning system 」 learners ?

2. Is learner character difference effect learning out come between 「 Facebook cooperation gaming system 」 and 「 Normal e-learning system 」 ？

3. What is the opinion of 「 Facebook cooperation gaming system 」 learners ?

Research Problem

6

Mason(2006)

Use by educators of Social Networking Sites (SNS), in their pedagogic practice and related issues of trust and privacy.

Mazer(2007) ； Kabilan(2010)

Increasing motivation, changing learning attitude

S.G.Mazman(2010)

Connectedness between students-faculty or students-students has potential to educational usage from Facebook.com to initiate decision making skills.

Facebook-earlier research

7

Johnson & Johnson 1994

Cooperation among students-who celebrate each other’s successes, encourage each other to do homework, and learn to work together.

Cooperation theory

Gaming Theory

Keegan(1995) Game increase self confidence

Jones(1997) Game increasing learning effect

9

Cosmetic Chemistry◦ Books & Web material

Research content

10

Text & Image & Animation

Normal e-learning system

11

12

13

1. Forming a learning group2. Step by step learning3. Sharing information 4. Game induce interest

Facebook cooperation gaming system

14

15

16

17

1. Skin care product ?(selection)2. Surfactants ?(shooting)3. DIY Lab(combination)

Game Design

18

Game#1 Skin care products

19

Game#1 Skin care products

20

Game#2 Surfactants

21

Game#3 DIY lab

22

Research ProcedureLogin

1.Pre-test (ACS Test Bank for General Chemistry)

2.GEMT test

Facebook Group E-Learning Group

1. Post-Test2. Questionnaire

Data Analysis

Learning Effect

Learning Character

Satisfaction Questionnaire

23

Result & Discussion

24

p ＞ .05

T-test of Pre-test scores

Group students average sd df t p

Experimental 105 61.14 19.38210 -.852 .144

Control 107 58.97 17.69

25

*p ＜ .05

T-test of Pro-test scores

Group students Average sd df t p

Experimental 105 86.57 13.00210 -1.156 .005*

Control 107 84.11 17.59

26

Karlin (2007)

More than 60% Facebook group students will discuss class material over internet.

Klein (2008)

Interacting with in social network will increasing their understanding in Science materials.

Better learning outcome

27

*p ＜ .05

Cognitive Pattern & Learning effect

Cognitive Pattern Group Average sd df t P

F.I.Exp.(n=52) 86.73 11.84

105 -1.021 .132Con.(n=55) 84.00 15.47

F.D.Exp.(n=53) 86.42 14.15

103 -.653 .014*Con.(n=52) 84.23 19.74

28

F.D. students ：◦ Like to share knowledge◦ Happy to help others◦ Prefer to study in social environment

(Witkin ， 1977 ； Oughton ， 1999 ； Riding ， 1999)

F.D. students perform better

29

*p ＜ .05

Gender difference & Learning effect

Gender Group Average sd df t P

MaleExp.(n=33) 84.55 14.60

63 -1.415 .270Con.(n=32) 78.75 18.27

Female

Exp.(n=72) 87.50 12.19

145 -.451 .008*Con.(n=75) 86.40 16.90

30

Female students like cooperation study.(Hayes ， 1994)

Female students spend 30% more time in the social network.(Aileen ， 2011)

Female students perform better

31

Satisfaction questionnaire◦ Likert Scale

◦ Response Rate (94/105)=90%

◦ Reliability .906

Facebook Questionnaire

32

Most of the students gave positive comment on the Facebook cooperation and gaming system.

Satisfaction Analysis

Valuation Questions Agree

Content Design 1~4 3.60

Learning Attitude 5~8 3.53

Overall 9~11 3.57

33

Learning Attitude

In the learning attitude, most of the students agree that it gave more motivation and have the tendency want to learn more.

Kabilan (2010)Using the social network on college English course, will bring up their confidence and learning motivation.

Learning Attitude Feedback Agree

5. Is Facebook study system funnier, and motivate me want to study more ?

3.51

7. Do I feel that in the Facebook study system, I can share knowledge with others and gain more knowledge ?

3.79

8. Do I feel less pressure in the Facebook learning environment? 3.44

34

1. Facebook cooperation and gaming system will increase the motivation and learning effect of students.

2. Field dependent and female students are best suited for Facebook cooperation and gaming system.

3. 85% students favor the Facebook platform study.

Conclusions

35

Thank you all

36

FB Conversation

37

FB Interaction

38

Facebook 合作式遊戲學習使用者問卷結果 同意度

1. 我覺得這次的 Facebook 學習，活動內容活潑生動 ? 3.87

2. 我覺得這次的 Facebook 學習，整體操作上很容易 ? 3.70

3. 我覺得這次的 Facebook 學習，內容的觀看對我來說是有負擔的 ?

3.31

4. 我覺得這次的 Facebook 學習，課程編排讓我更了解我的學習重點 ?

3.53

5. 這樣的 Facebook 學習，讓我覺得學習是件有趣的事，更讓我想去 學習 ?

3.51

6. 我於 Facebook 學習活動進行中，會利用我登入 Facebook時利用時 間來閱讀學習課程內容 ?

3.28

7. 我覺得在 Facebook 學習活動過程中，透過大家分享，我可以學到更多的知識 ?

3.79

8. 我覺得以 Facebook 學習來進行學習，比較不會有壓力 ? 3.44

9. 如果可以，下次我願意再使用 Facebook 來進行學習 ? 3.57

10. 我希望以後在學校各科課程中，能夠讓我們使用 Facebook 學習 的方式來學習課程 ?

3.62

11. 整體而言，我覺得 Facebook 學習活動對我的學習很有幫助 ? 3.52

39

Facebook & Blog

Facebook Blog

Renew Massage Active Passive

Exposure High Low

Interaction Strong Weak

Immediate Yes N

40

41

Facebook Connection

Share Bottom→Strong connection

42

Facebook

創辦人： Mark Zuckerberg2010 年 03 月 Facebook 在美國到訪人數超越 Google2010 年 07 月 Facebook 註冊會員突破 5 億成為世界最大的社群網站

43

Facebook

免費 資訊分享迅速

New Feed

44

Global Audience: 460922100 50%+ login everyday 每個禮拜就會增加五百萬篇以上的分享文章 Facebook 已成為另一個新的傳播管道

是一種社交工具，幫助用戶更快速地分享訊息及更有效地與家人、朋友和同事做溝通交流。

Facebook.com

45

Facebook 開發程式專頁

46

Facebook 開發程式設定頁面