amef 1
DESCRIPTION
AmefTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: amef 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082405/55cf8fce550346703ba00e46/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
AMEF Enunciado del Problema:Nombre del Proceso
estacion 1 monoblock
# de Paso Función o Paso del Proceso Modo de Falla
1 monoblock ruptura o fractura2 cigüeñal mala torqueado en bancada 3 aarbol de levas modulos desgastados4 pistones fallo de añillos5 vielas torcedura6 cilindros desgaste exesivo de la superficie interna del cilindro
![Page 2: amef 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082405/55cf8fce550346703ba00e46/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Enunciado del Problema: clasificacion de piezas
monoblock
monoblock cigüeñalvielaspiston
arbol de levas
Efecto de la Fallaprevencion de las fallas DPU
Interno Externo fisura no exeder de la temperatura 9 9
metales desgastados contar con la herramiente y el conocieto para hacer el torqueado9 9los valacines no entran bien verificar la lubricacion 9 9
desgaste buena colocacion de añillos 9 9ralladura en almohadillas y partes evitar golpes en las vielas 9 10
picadura por contacto de agua o corrocionverificar y pulir superficies internas 10 9
SEV
![Page 3: amef 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082405/55cf8fce550346703ba00e46/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
clasificacion de piezas Equipo de Trabajo
busos oscar marcos mendez metales alan olivera perezjuntas marcel cruz cruz
ivan llanos ramirezjesus alberto villegas
RPN Causa de la Falla Responsable Fecha de Inicio
10 9 810 mala colocacion y calentamiento juan manuel 9 de febrero10 9 810 uso exesivo juan manuel 9 de febrero10 9 810 mala lubricacion juan manuel 9 de febrero10 9 810 rectificado esta mal juan manuel 9 de febrero10 9 810 sobre calientamiento por esfuerzo exesivo juan manuel 9 de febrero10 9 900 cilindros desgastados juan manuel 9 de febrero
OCU DET
![Page 4: amef 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082405/55cf8fce550346703ba00e46/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Equipo de TrabajoRevision: 0000juan manuel hernandez mendez
Fecha : 10 - febrero - 2015
Fecha de Inicio fecha de entrega
9 de febrero9 de febrero9 de febrero9 de febrero9 de febrero9 de febrero
![Page 5: amef 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082405/55cf8fce550346703ba00e46/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
SeverityRating
None No effect 1
Low
2
3
Moderate
4
5
6
High
7
8
Extreme
9
10
Back
Delay on deliveries to meet Strategic Goal and/or Objective.Minor Rework may be required on the Fly.
Delay on deliveries to meet Strategic Goal and/or Objective.Minor Rework on the Fly.
Disruption to meet Strategic Goal and/or Objective.Minor Rework on the Fly.
Disruption to meet Strategic Goal and/or Objective. Minor Rework may be Required.
Disruption to meet Strategic Goal and/or Objective. Minor Rework Required!!.
Noticeable loss of Takt Time
Disruption to meet Strategic Goal and/or Objective. Major Rework Required!!.
Noticeable loss of Takt Time
Major Disruption to meet Strategic Goal and/or Objective. Process Stop!!Possible jig lock and Major loss of Takt Time
May cause no compliance of Strategic Goals and Objectives.Hazardous with warning
No Compliance of Strategic Goals and Objectives.Hazardous without warning
![Page 6: amef 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082405/55cf8fce550346703ba00e46/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Likelihood of Occurrance Failure Rate Rating (Cpk)0 1
None 1 in 1.5 M 6.66667E-07 1 > 1.67
Low
1 in 150K 6.66667E-06 2 > 1.50
Processes is in statistical control. 1 in 15 K 6.66667E-05 3 > 1.33
Moderate
1 in 2000 0.0005 4 > 1.17
1 in 400 0.0025 5 > 1.00
1 in 80 0.0125 6 > 0.83
High
1 in 20 0.05 7 > 0.67
1 in 8 0.125 8 > 0.51
Extreme Failure almost inevitable
1 in 3 0.333333333 9 > 0.33
1 in 2 0.5 10 < 0.33
Back
Failure is unlikeky. No known failures associated with almost identical processes.
Process is in statistical control. Only isolated failures associated with almost identical processes
Process is in statistical control but with isolated failures. Previous processes have experienced occassional failures or out-of-control conditions.
Process is not statistical control. Similar processes have experienced problems.
![Page 7: amef 1](https://reader036.vdocuments.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082405/55cf8fce550346703ba00e46/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Likelihood that control will detect failure Rating
Extreme
1
2
High
3
4
Moderate
5
6
7
Low
8
9
Very Low 10
Back
The process automatically detects failure. Controls will almost certainly
detect the existance of a failure.
Controls have a good chance of detecting the existance of a failure
Controls may detect the existance of a failure
Control have a remote chance of detecting the failure
No known control(s) available to detect failure mode