인간 개념의 혼란과 포스트휴머니즘...

http://dx.doi.org/10.15750/chss.58.201511.005

, , , , , , ,

, , . , . . ,

, . , , . (posthomo sapiens) (, humanism) . , ,

. (, artficial) . (, natural) . .

128 .

.

1.

(, , homo, human, Mensch) ( )1) (animal rationale) .

(, , bestia) (, animal, Lebewesen) , (, , vita, Leben) (, , , anima) .

(, mens, spiritus, Geist)(, animus, mind) , .

() [] [] , . () , , (), () () .2) () , (), (), () (), () .3) () ()

1) Aritoteles, Politica, 1253a 9/10 . 2) , : .3) , : .

129 () ,4) () 5) .

() [] . () , ,6) , () () () () , () () .

, (ruah) . , ( 33, 6), []( 19, 17), []( 10, 14) ( 3, 8) [ ]( 10, 19) . . , (ruah jahve) . .

4) , : ; , , : .

5) , : .6) () .

(): .()(, , ).

(): , .( )(, 15).

() : [] [] , . , , , , , .( )(, 4).

130 , .(, 104, 30)

( 6, 17), , .( 6, 7 ) . . . , , [ , ] .(, 33, 6) .

(nefes) .( 23, 12) (nefes) (ruah) , . , .

() () . , , , . [ ] , . . . . , , . (Aristoteles, BC 384322) .

(Platon, BC427347) , , ,

131 , () . () /()7) .

. , , , ( 27, 50), (2, 8) . , .

() . () .8)

. , , . , (). , (spiritus) , .9) . .10) . () . () , () . .

7) Platon, Phaidros, 245c.8) .(Diogenes Laertios, Vitae philosophorum, VII, 157)9) Cicero, De natura deorum, II, 19.

10) Diogenes Laertios, VII, 156.

132 () () . , . . , .11) , . .

. .

.12) , . , .

1 (syncretism) . . () . . .

()(gnosticism) . , . ,

11) Diogenes Laertios, VII, 158 .12) mens sana in corpore sano.(Juvenal, Satires, X. 356)

133. .

. , .13) . , . () . , , , .

(spiritus) 12 , , .

(Augustinus, 354430) (spiritus) , . , .14)

, . ,15) (Descartes, 15961650) (mens)[](corpus) , (mens) , (Newton, 16421726) 1 [

13) Plotinos, Enneades, II, 2, 2 .14) Augustinus, De natura et origine animae, IV, 2223; De trinitate, XV, 5, 7 .15) (animal, quod totum ex mente constaret)

, (ea mens nihil haberet in se, quod esset secundum naturam).(Cicero, De finibus bonorum et malorum, IV, 28) .

134] , . [] . [] (passiv) (rezeptiv) (aktiv) (spontan) , (anima) (animus) . . (Principium des Lebens)16) , (anima) (Animalitt) , . , . , . . [] [] .

, . , . (anima vegetativa) .17) (anima sensitiva) 18) , , 19) , 20) , , . /

16) , [KrV], A345=B403.17) Platon, Timaios, 77a .18) , 3: .19) Kant, [KpV], A16=V9.20) Kant, KpV, A16=V9.

135 animal Lebewesen .

2.

() (ratio) , , ( ) ( ) . , () , , (anima rationalis) () . [] , (animal brutum) (animal rationale) .

, , , . . , , .

. , . , , .21)

21) Kant, [Anth], AB3=VII127.

136

, . , , , , , , (Entfremdung) . , . .

, . () () , . 22) , 23) . , , (Wille) . , (Willkr) .

, . , . , . ,

22) Kant, [MS, RL], AB1=VI121.23) Kant, MS, RL, AB5=VI213.

137 .

3.

1) . ,

. , ?

A 2 , A . . , , .

, 2 , , A

. , A . ? 2 , A . ? , . , . .

. .

138 .24) , .

2) ,

, , , , .

,

.

. , , . .

3) ,

, . .

, . , , , ,

24) Ernst Peter Fischer, Die Bildung des Menschen, Berlin 2004: , , , 2005, 10 .

139 .25) , , 26) . . . () , . . , , . , , (). .

,

27). .

, , , . , , , . , , , .

, , . , , ,

25) Kant, KpV, A142 =V80.26) Kant, KpV, A143=V80.27) Kant, [GMS], B79=IV436.

140 . () . , ( : animal rationabile) ( : animal rationale) .28) . , (entelekeia).

.

, . .

. , , .

. -

. .

. ,

. 1 1 , 1 . .

28) Kant, Anth, A315=B313=VII321.

141 . .

. . , . . (Leib), (Krper) . , ? , .

, . . , .

? , , , , ,

.

, .

, , , . ,

142 , , , , , , . ,

. , .

:

(1) . (2) . . (3)

. (4) . .

.29)

(1) , (1) (2) , (3) . (4) .

(2) , (3) . ,

29) Michael S. Gazzaniga, Whos in Charge Free Will and the Science of the Brain(2011): , , , ?, , 2012, 197/8.

143 . . .

,

.

. (, prietal lobe) (, occipital lobe) (, prosopagnosia) .

. .30)

. (anterior cingulate sulcus) . . .31)

. , , , , .

30) Edward O. Wilson, Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge(1998): / , : , 2005, , 202.

31) Wilson, , 202/3.

144 . .

( ) , . .

, , . . . .

.32)

. . . . . [] . [] , .33)

. . () . . . . , . [] .34)

32) Fischer, , , 219.33) Fischer, , 219.34) Fischer, , 245 .

145

(nature) (nurture) , . (Leibniz, 16461716) 1 : 3 ,35) (rationalitas) , (animalitas) , . ,

, . .

, , . , . , (), .

. ()

(human, human being) ( )

, (, humanism) (posthomo sapiens) . , ,

35) Leibniz, Monadologie, 28 .

146 ,

.

. , , , ( ) . () , 1,000 36) .

, .

(ipsa scientia potestas est)37) ,

. .38) , , , . , , , , . , [ ] 39) = . ()

36) D. P. Omathuna, Nanoethics(2009): , , , 2015, 224.

37) F. Bacon(1579), Meditationes Sacr, 11. Artikel De Hresibus: The Essaies of Sr Francis Bacon. His Religious Meditations. Places of Perswasion and Disswasion. London 1613, p. 180.

38) HorkheimerAdorno(1947), Dialektik der Aufklrung, Fankfurt/M. 212013, S. 10.39) HorkheimerAdorno(1947), S. 11 .

147. .

,

. . (posthumanism) .

, ,

. (, artficial) . (, natural) . . . . , . (Kant, 17241804) .

.40) . .

, .

.

1) ?2) ?

40) Kant, Kritik der Urteilskraft: , , B179=V306.

1483) , ?

.

4) ? ?

?5) () ?

?6) ?

?

.

7) ? 50 80

? 8)

? ( .)

.

9) ? , ?

(

149 , ,

, .)

, ?

. , . . , .

: 2015. 10. 05: 2015. 11. 05: 2015. 11. 09

150

,

Platon, Phaidros. , Timaios.Aritoteles, Politica.Cicero, De natura deorum. , De finibus bonorum et malorum.Juvenal, Satires.Diogenes Laertios, Vitae philosophorum.Plotinos, Enneades,Augustinus, De natura et origine animae. , De trinitate.F. Bacon, Meditationes Sacr, 11. Artikel De Hresibus: The

Essaies of Sr Francis Bacon. His Religious Meditations. Places of Perswasion and Disswasion. London 1613.

Leibniz, Monadologie.

/ , [KrV], , 2006.

151 , [KpV], , 2009. , [KU], , 2009. , [GMS], , 2014. , [MS], , 2012. , [Anth], , 2014.

HorkheimerAdorno(1947), Dialektik der Aufklrung, Fankfurt/M. 212013.E. P. Fischer, Die Bildung des Menschen(2004): , ,

, 2005.M. S. Gazzaniga, Whos in Charge Free Will and the Science of the

Brain(2011): , , , ?, , 2012.

D. P. Omathuna, Nanoethics(2009): , , , 2015.

E. O. Wilson, Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge(1998): / , : , , 2005.

152ABSTRACT

Confused Concepts of Human Beings & Problems of post-Humanism

Paek, Chong-Hyon

The traditional concept of the human being is such that he is (1) an animal in that he has capacities of nourishment and reproduction as well as those of perception, volition, and self-movement; and also (2) a rational animal, in that he has faculties of thinking, feeling aesthetic pleasures, and setting up laws of good and evil; and finally (3) a person conceived as a dignified and even sacred being, in that he has the will to exclude what is evil and realize what is good. The strongest ground on which the dignity of human being lies is that he has the capacity of being responsible for his acts, and this capacity of responsibility in turn is based on the autonomy of human reason. Here the spirit is supposed as the headquarter of this autonomy.

It is generally agreed that civil society and scientific technology are the two essential elements which make up modern Western civilization. The foundations of these elements, that is, democracy and natural science respectively, however, though they are the supreme achievements of the modern world, have actually claimed the sacrifice of the spirit. For the human being in the modern political society behaves as if he were a bodily being and the contemporary science and the scientism doubt the existence of free will and autonomy of

153human beings, which are the matrix of personhood. In this situation, the post homo sapiens that result from contemporary scientific technology is shaking humanism to its very foundation.

Given that the human being is a natural object, and that the product of a natural object is also a natural object, it should be acknowledged that artificial intelligence and similar artificial products that emerge from human intellect and work are in fact natural objects of a certain sort. At this point, there is no object to which the word artificial rightly applies: everything in nature is natural. Thus, the essential distinction between the natural and the artificial human disappears. Answering those questions about the essence of humans and human life, provoked by the post human society that has progressed with the scientific technology of modern civilization, is the very problem the philosophy is facing today.

Keywords: human being, humanism, post homo sapiens, post human