analysis on energy consumption of road transportation in china jian chai, quanying lu, xiaoyang zhou
Post on 01-Jan-2016
216 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Analysis on Energy Consumption of Road Transportation in China
Jian Chai, Quanying Lu, Xiaoyang Zhou
OUTLINE
INTRODUCTIONI.
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
SAMPLING APPROACH
MODELING APPROACH AND DATA ANALYSIS
CONCLUSIONS
III.
IV.
V
Two main difficulties in Transportation Research
• China's transport sector statistics is not careful, the departments of carbon dioxide output many estimated using mode, there is no accurate statistical results.
• Strategy of modeling
VAR BVAR
The VAR model compared to traditional forecasting methods, it is a effective and predictive model for time-series variables interconnected system, so it is used to analyze the influence of different types of random error term on the dynamics of the system variables frequently.
However, when the number of the elected samples is insufficient, the VAR model will cause multicollinearity and degrees of freedom fallen. As a result, it has parameter estimation errors. At this time, the BVAR model can remedy the defect of VAR model. According to the characteristics of Bayesian theory itself, it has obvious advantages in the case of small samples.
Using different prior information on the VAR model of posterior distribution effect is relatively rare. Posterior mean can be considered some suitable loss function. The loss function is minimized using commonly used in the BVAR model of the article a few.
Shawn Ni, Dongchu Sun (2003) discussed different loss functions common information without prior different and several under, VAR model estimation results, and the use of U.S. macroeconomic data to illustrate. The results show that, in the constant prior distribution, LINEX estimation of loss function slightly than the estimation results obtained under the square loss function, the difference of the point, but the general case of LINEX loss better.
IPCC Mobile sources (Department of transportation)
carbon dioxide emissions accounting methods
• The top-down method• The down to top method
n
i ii
C EF k
The calculation formula is as follows:
iEF
ik
i
refers to Emission factors of different fuels
refers to consumption of different fuel types
refers to types of fuel
CO2 Emission Factor
The type of transportation
The type of fuel
Default IPCC Lower limit
IPCCUpper limit
Road Transportation
gasoline 69300 67500 73000
diesel 74100 72600 74800
The evaluation of CO2 Emission ( billion tons)Year CO2 emission Year CO2 emission
1987 0.38 2000 1.58
1988 0.40 2001 1.63
1989 0.42 2002 1.73
1990 0.43 2003 1.98
1991 0.46 2004 2.40
1992 0.52 2005 2.73
1993 0.56 2006 3.011994 0.61 2007 3.23
1995 0.72 2008 3.53
1996 0.73 2009 3.55
1997 0.82 2010 3.86
1998 1.01 2011 4.24
1999 1.14
Total turnoverThe population P
The energy of road consumption Y
GDP
VAR
A. Approach of Selecting factorsA. Approach of Selecting factors
CO2 emission
IV.MODELING APPROACH AND DATA ANALYSISIV.MODELING APPROACH AND DATA ANALYSIS
Firstly, the general VAR model:
A. VAR Modeling ApproachA. VAR Modeling Approach
1 1 , 1, 2, ,t t p t p ty c A y A y t n
represents the k order random vector1t t Kty y y ( )
1A pA m m to represents the coefficient matrix of
c is a m dimensional vector
Assume that t is white noise sequence'( ) 0, ( )t t tE E
is a m m positive definite matrix '( ) 0, ( )t tE t s
TABLE I. THE VARIABLES OF UNIT ROOT TEST RESULTSVARIABLE ADF statistics 5% critical
valueconclusion
LNY 0.278328 -2.981038 Not smooth
LNGDP -1.761321 -3.004861 Not smooth
LNP -2.381297 -3.004861 Not smooth
LNZZ 1.139937 -2.981038 Not smooth
LNCO2 -0.021663 -2.981038 Not smooth
D(LNY) -6.174142 -2.986225 smooth
D(LNGDP) -1.780041 -3.012362 Not smooth
D(LNP,1) -1.370676 -2.986225 Not smooth
D(LNZZ) -4.306471 -2.986225 smooth
D(LNCO2) -4.779938 -2.986225 smooth
D(LNY,2) -9.113328 -2.991878 smooth
D(LNGDP,2) -3.321661 -3.012363 smooth
D(LNP,2) -4.823579 -2.991878 smooth
D(LNZZ,2) -4.239503 -3.004861 smooth
D(LNCO2,2) -5.684127 -2.998064 smooth
LNP
LNY
LNGDP
A. VAR Modeling ApproachA. VAR Modeling Approach
LNGDP
VAR
0.3452 ( 1) 0.3456 ( 2) 0.3607 ( 1) 0.1321 ( 2)
14.1156 ( 1) 16.6608 ( 2) 0.01705 ( 1) 0.1320 ( 2)
0.2291 2( 1) 0.0500 2( 2) 25.3171
LNY LNY LNY LNGDP LNGDP
LNP LNP LNZZ LNZZ
LNCO LNCO
LNZZ
LNY
LNCO2
0.3678 ( 1) 0.2872 ( 2) 1.1343 ( 1) 0.3166 ( 2)
10.6114 ( 1) 9.4750 ( 2) 0.08631 ( 1) 0.0647 ( 2)
0.12061 2( 1) 0.1427 2( 2) 8.8114
LNGDP LNY LNY LNGDP LNGDP
LNP LNP LNZZ LNZZ
LNCO LNCO
0.0003 ( 1) 0.0027 ( 2) 0.0046 ( 1) 0.0017 ( 2)
0.9924 ( 1) 0.0710 ( 2) 0.0002 ( 1) 0.0004 ( 2)
0.0014 2( 1) 0.0017 2( 2) 0.9215
LNP LNY LNY LNGDP LNGDP
LNP LNP LNZZ LNZZ
LNCO LNCO
0.8332 ( 1) 0.4324 ( 2) 0.4191 ( 1) 0.2110 ( 2)
26.6465 ( 1) 39.9649 ( 2) 0.5448 ( 1) 0.0259 ( 2)
0.4064 2( 1) 0.1972 2( 2) 140.6988
LNZZ LNY LNY LNGDP LNGDP
LNP LNP LNZZ LNZZ
LNCO LNCO
2 0.2816 ( 1) 0.3521 ( 2) 0.3226 ( 1) 0.3565 ( 2)
21.6218 ( 1) 21.3615 ( 2) 0.0779 ( 1) 0.0566 ( 2)
0.9138 2( 1) 0.0717 2( 2) 2.5581
LNCO LNY LNY LNGDP LNGDP
LNP LNP LNZZ LNZZ
LNCO LNCO
TABLE II. THE ESTIMATION RESULTS OF VAR MODEL
LNY LNGDP LNP LNZZ LNCO2R-squared 0.99566 0.999392 0.999674 0.971688 0.971688
Adj. R-squared 0.99256 0.998958 0.946014 0.951465 0.951465Sum sq. resids 0.053833 0.017455 0.998695 0.472284 0.472284S.E. equation 0.06201 0.03531 1.20E-07 0.18367 0.18367
F-statistic 321.1876 2300.998 1021.330 48.04904 48.04904Log likelihood 41.28591 55.36402 68.83425 14.13968 14.13968
Akaike AIC -2.42287 -3.54912 -13.74094 -0.25117 -0.25117Schwarz SC -1.88657 -3.01282 -13.58755 0.285131 0.285131
Mean dependent 10.82368 11.32511 17.42617 11.27772 11.27772S.D. dependent 0.718915 1.093659 0.006776 0.833702 0.833702
Determinant resid covariance (dof adj.)
1.42E-17
Determinant resid covariance 7.83E-19 Log likelihood 343.7734 Akaike information criterion -23.1019 Schwarz criterion -20.4204
Fig.2 Impulse response
-.02
-.01
.00
.01
.02
.03
.04
.05
.06
.07
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
LNYLNGDPLNPLNZZLNCO2
Response of LNY to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations
Fig.3 Variance decomposition
-.02
-.01
.00
.01
.02
.03
.04
.05
.06
.07
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
LNYLNGDPLNPLNZZLNCO2
Response of LNY to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations
B. BVAR Modeling Approach
Although the VAR model does not consider the economic theory model has improved, but because of the VAR model does not consider the economic theory, it cannot give any structural interpretation, which makes people to question this way. Secondly, the main shortcomings of VAR model are quite a few parameters need to estimate, the data sample sequence length requirement is too large. When the sample size is small, the parameter estimator error is bigger. But the Bias theory has the absolute advantage in the case of small samples, provides a new method for estimating the parameters of VAR model solves the problem of excessive. So this paper uses VAR and BVAR model respectively on the Shaanxi province coal consumption market analysis, and then comparing the predicted results of two models.
B. BVAR Modeling ApproachGeneral VAR equation in matrix form is also
available:' , 1, 2,t t ty Z B u t n
If the vectorty '
tZ B tu 1,2,t n ( )
were arranged according to transpose rows, each forming a matrix of the equation can be written as follows: , (0, )nm nY ZB U U N I
1 2, , , ,TT T T
n n mY y y y
1 2 ( 1)
, , ,TT T T
n n mpZ z z z
1 2, , ,TT T T
n n mU u u u
1 ( 1)
, , ,TT T T
p mp mB c A A
1 ( 1) 11, , ,
T
t t t p mpz y y
1) Normal-Wishart prior Prior distribution coefficient vector is the normal distribution. The prior distribution of the covariance is Wishart distribution. That is the conjugate prior distribution. Prior distribution coefficient vector is
( ) ( , )g b N b 1( ) ( , )g W v
, ,b v are fixed.
By proving, the posterior distribution of the coefficient vector and the covariance matrix is also Normal-Wishart:
( 1)/21 1 1 11( ) exp{ } ( , )
2
n v m
mg y trD W D n v
2) flat-flat priorSuppose that B and are independent of each other, ( , ) ( ) ( )P B P B P
Based on the theory of Jeffreys, ( )P B c is a constant, ( 1)/2
( )m
P
So at a given ,Multiple with mean B 1ˆ ( )B Z Z Z Y of the normal distribution,
is the inverse Wishart distribution. By using the integral exchange posterior distribution:
( 1)/2 1
0
/2
1 ˆ ˆ( , ) exp [ ( ) ( )]2
ˆ ˆ( ) ( )
n m
n
P B Z Y tr S B B Z Z B B d
S B B Z Z B B
prediction prior distribution results are shown in Table IV.
3) Loss function
ˆˆ ˆ, e 1a
L b a
0, 0a b
0a
It is a convex function.
The damage estimates from too much less than estimated to estimate the loss is bigger.
0a The damage estimates is opposite to above.
The MCMC algorithm
1
1 1
ˆ ˆˆ , exp 1Lp p
ij ij ij ij ij iji j
L E a a Y
1ˆ ,L The loss of
, 1
1ˆ ˆ, ,N
nY nL L
N
We let the parameter corresponding to the intercept term 1 j be 0.001.
implying a near symmetric loss, and that corresponding to non-intercept term be -4. The value -4 was used by Zellner (1986) for estimating the normal means.
Prior Flat-Flat(Normal-inwishart) ( Normal-
wishart)
Posterior 5.85( 25.62) 14.23( 25.62)
The average loss of posterior
0.014 0.002
TABLE IV. THE PREDICTION RESULTS OF ROAD ENERGY CONSUMPTION
Model BVARPrior=0
BVARPrior=2
2011 169735.4 166971.92012 188295.3 177724.92013 209069.5 186436.72014 232343.2 194741.02015 258442.4 202398.72016 287737.0 210284.42017 320650.2 218353.22018 357665.0 226127.42019 399333.4 232962.82020 446286.8 238471.5
V.CONCLUSIONSWhen we assumed a positive impact of GDP, road energy consumption reaches a nadir in the third period, then declines gradually and then begins to converge in the 20th period, indicating that the GDP impact on gas consumption is significant from the third year onwards and lasts for a long period. When positive impact of population growth rate is assumed, road energy consumption can be seen to be declining gradually before the 2th period and then begins to increase steadily until convergence in the 9th period. However, a decline in population growth has a negative impact on road energy consumption. When a positive impact of total turnover is assumed, road energy consumption reaches a peak in the 4th period after a period of fluctuation, and then can be seen to be declining in the 8th period, with convergence beginning in the 15th period. When a positive impact of CO2 emission is assumed, road energy consumption increasing gradually before the 6th period, and then can be seen to be declining in the 7th period, with convergence beginning in the 15th period. The result shows that if we give CO2 emission a positive impact, the impact of road energy consumption is also positive in the short term.
• The result shows that the loss is minimal under the Plat-plat prior.
• At the end of the twelfth five-year plan ( 2011-2015), China will nearly approach 202398.7 one thousand tons of oil equivalent, in 2020, China nearly 238471.5 one thousand tons of oil equivalent.
top related