ce413 highway eng ii[1]
Post on 03-Jun-2018
244 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
1/132
KYAMBOGO UNIVERSITY
CE 413HighwayEngineering IILecture NotesF.E. Okello
8/23/2010
The notes deal with the design of flexible pavements based on the TRL Standard together
with aspects of drainage design based on the Ministry of Works and Transport Guidelines
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
2/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
i
iPreamble
Preamble
Global developments in highway engineering are evolving at an incredible speed. New
materials, planning and design concepts together with radically distinctive construction
practices are emerging as road users demand high quality roads. Following the recent
restructuring of the Ministry of Works and Transport, Uganda is due to modernise its road
transport system with subsequent construction of high speed highway facilities. Highway
Engineering IIis hereby presented as part of the comprehensive courses taught in Kyambogo
University in partial fulfilment of the award of the Bachelor of Engineering in Civil and
Building Engineering of Kyambogo University. This course is delivered in the second
semester of fourth year and carries a credit unit of four (4) with a total of 60 contact hours. It
introduces and examines the major principles and practices encountered during the Flexible
Pavement Design Processof highway systems. The main Objective of the course is to impart
and equip the student with the values, knowledge and skills necessary to design a flexible
pavement. By the end of the course the candidate should be able to: Survey possible routes,
assess traffic flow, measure subgrade strength, select pavement materials and select the
appropriate pavement structures required for flexible pavement construction. The authors hope
is that this revised edition of the notes will be simpler to read, revise, comprehend and apply to
the daily challenges that are faced by the student and the practicing Highway Engineer.
May the Almighty God richly bless you!
F.E. Okello
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
3/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
ii
iiTable of Contents
Table of Contents
Preamble ....................................................................................................................................... i
Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... ii
List of Tables .............................................................................................................................. iv
List of Design Charts .................................................................................................................. vi
Acronyms ................................................................................................................................... vii
Chapter One: ................................................................................................................................ 1
Introduction to Pavement Design................................................................................................. 1
General ......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Types of Pavements .......................................................................................................... 2
1.2 Elements of a Flexible Pavement ...................................................................................... 3
1.3 Overview of the Design Process ....................................................................................... 5
1.4 Design Approaches ........................................................................................................... 7
1.5 Design Standards .............................................................................................................. 7
1.6 Questions........................................................................................................................... 8
1.7 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................... 8
Chapter Two: ............................................................................................................................. 10
Traffic Assessment..................................................................................................................... 10
2.1 General ............................................................................................................................ 10
2.2 Estimation of Traffic Flows (F) ...................................................................................... 10
2.3 Determination of Cumulative Standard Axles (T) .......................................................... 18
2.4 Example 2.1: Traffic Assessment ................................................................................... 19
2.5 Questions......................................................................................................................... 212.6 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 23
Chapter Three: ........................................................................................................................... 24
Subgrade Strength Assessment .................................................................................................. 244.1 General ............................................................................................................................ 24
4.2 Climatic Regime ............................................................................................................. 24
4.3 Testing Subgrade Soils ................................................................................................... 25
4.4
Example 3.1: DCP Test................................................................................................... 374.5 Defining Uniform Sections ............................................................................................. 39
4.6 Design of Earth Works .................................................................................................... 39
4.7 Questions......................................................................................................................... 45
4.8 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 48
Chapter Four: ............................................................................................................................. 49
Selection of Pavement Materials ............................................................................................... 49
5.1 General ............................................................................................................................ 49
5.2 Unbound Pavement Materials ......................................................................................... 49
5.3 Bitumen Bound Pavement Materials .............................................................................. 57
5.4 Bituminous Surfacings .................................................................................................... 63
5.5 Bituminous Roadbases .................................................................................................... 70
5.6
Surface Dressing ............................................................................................................. 73
5.7 Example 4.1: Surface Dressing ....................................................................................... 86
5.8 Questions......................................................................................................................... 89
5.9 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 92
Chapter Five: .............................................................................................................................. 93
The Structure Catalogue ............................................................................................................ 93
5.1 Basis for the Structure Catalogue ................................................................................... 93
5.2 How to use the Structure Catalogue................................................................................ 93
5.3 Key to Structural Catalogue ............................................................................................ 95
5.4 Pavement Design Charts ................................................................................................. 96
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
4/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
iii
iiiTable of Contents
5.5 Questions....................................................................................................................... 104
5.6 Bibliography ................................................................................................................. 104
Chapter Six: ............................................................................................................................. 105
Highway Drainage ................................................................................................................... 105
6.1 General .......................................................................................................................... 105
6.2 Main functions of Drainage .......................................................................................... 105
6.3 Highway Drainage Terminologies ................................................................................ 105
6.4
Surface Drainage ........................................................................................................... 1066.5 Sub-Surface Drainage ................................................................................................... 111
6.6 Cross Drainage .............................................................................................................. 112
6.7 Culverts ......................................................................................................................... 113
6.8 Questions....................................................................................................................... 119
6.9 Bibliograhy ................................................................................................................... 120Chapter Seven: ......................................................................................................................... 122
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 122
7.1 Road Deterioration ........................................................................................................ 1227.2 Economic Considerations ............................................................................................. 122
7.3 Effects of Climate ......................................................................................................... 123
5.7 Variability in Material Properties and Road Performance ............................................ 123
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
5/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
iv
ivList of Tables
List of Tables
Table 2.1: Selection of Design Life ........................................................................................... 17
Table 2.2: Axle Factor Multipliers............................................................................................. 19
Table 2.3: Traffic Classes .......................................................................................................... 19
Table 2.4: Two-Way Traffic Volume at the Project Road (in vehicles/day) ............................. 19
Table 2.5: Axle Weights (in tonnes) .......................................................................................... 19
Table 2.6: Axle Loads (in tons) ................................................................................................. 21
Table 2.7: Friday 24-hr count summary .................................................................................... 22
Table 2.8: Sunday 24-hr count summary ................................................................................... 22
Table 2.9: 16-hr counts on the remaining days .......................................................................... 22
Table 3.1: Water Table Correction Factors for Soil Type PI ..................................................... 26
Table 3.2: Subgrade Strength Classes ........................................................................................ 28
Table 3.3: Number of blows required in the compaction test .................................................... 29
Table 3.4: Typical CBR Values ................................................................................................. 29
Table 3.5: CBR Preparation Sheet ............................................................................................. 31
Table 3.6: CBR Penetration Sheet ............................................................................................. 32
Table 3.7: DCP Field Results..................................................................................................... 37
Table 4.1: Properties of Unbound Materials .............................................................................. 49
Table 4.2: Grading Limits for crushed stone base materials (GB1,A; GB1,B) ......................... 51
Table 4.3: Mechanical strength requirements for the aggregate fraction of crushed stone
roadbases (GB1,A; GB1,B) as defined by the Ten Percent Fines Test ..................................... 51
Table 4.4: Typical Coarse aggregate gradings for Dry-bound (GB2,A) and Water-bound
Macadam (GB2,B) ..................................................................................................................... 53Table 4.5: Recommended Particle size distribution for mechanically stable natural gravels and
weathered rocks for use as roadbases (GB3) ............................................................................. 53
Table 4.6: Recommended Plasticity characteristics for granular Sub-bases (GS) ..................... 56Table 4.7: Typical Particle Size distribution for sub-bases (GS) which meet strength
requirements ............................................................................................................................... 56
Table 4.8: Coarse Aggregate for Bituminous mixes .................................................................. 61
Table 4.9: Fine Aggregate for Bituminous Mixes ..................................................................... 62Table 4.10: Asphaltic Concrete Surfacings ............................................................................... 66
Table 4.11: Suggested Marshall Test Criteria ............................................................................ 66
Table 4.12: Voids in Mineral Aggregate (VMA) ...................................................................... 67
Table 4.13: Bitumen Macadam Surfacings ................................................................................ 68
Table 4.14: Suggested Marshall Criteria for Close Graded Bitumen Macadams or DBMs ...... 68
Table 4.15: Hot Rolled Asphalt (HRA) Surfacings ................................................................... 69
Table 4.16: Bituminous Macadam Roadbase ............................................................................ 71
Table 4.17: Rolled Asphalt Roadbase ........................................................................................ 71
Table 4.18: Job-mix Tolerances ................................................................................................. 73
Table 4.19: Manufacturing and rolling temperature (in degrees centigrade) ............................ 73
Table 4.20: Category of Road Surface Hardness ....................................................................... 78
Table 4.21: Traffic Categories for Surface Dressing ................................................................. 78
Table 4.22: Recommended maximum chipping size (mm) ....................................................... 78
Table 4.23: Condition Constants for determining the rate of application of Binder ................. 83
Table 4.24: Typical Bitumen Spray Rate Adjustment Factors .................................................. 85
Table 5.1: Summary of Material Requirements for the Design Charts ..................................... 94
Table 6.1: Run off coefficient for the rational method ............................................................ 108
Table 6.2: Run off coefficient for the rational method ............................................................ 110
Table 6.3: Maximum Permissible velocity in open channels .................................................. 110
Table 6.4: Mannings n Values ................................................................................................ 111
Table 6.5: Entrance loss Coefficient (Outlet Control, Full or Partially full) ........................... 118
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
6/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
v
vList of Tables
List of FiguresFigure 1.1: Definition of Pavement layers ................................................................................... 3
Figure 1.2: The Pavement Design Process .................................................................................. 6
Figure 2.1: Form for Manual Classified Counts ........................................................................ 12Figure 2.2: Axle Load Survey Form A for recording vehicle survey data ................................ 15
Figure 2.3: Axle Load Survey Form B for recording vehicle wheel loads ................................ 16
Figure 3.1: CBR Test Machine .................................................................................................. 30Figure 3.2: Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in use ........................................................................ 34
Figure 3.3: The TRL Dynamic Cone Penetrometer ................................................................... 35
Figure 3.4: DCP-CBR relationships .......................................................................................... 36
Figure 3.5: The DCP Test Result ............................................................................................... 36
Figure 3.6: Defining Uniform Sections ..................................................................................... 39
Figure 3.7: Dry density moisture content relationships for a gravel-sand-clay ...................... 43
Figure 4.1: Type of Surface Dressing ........................................................................................ 76
Figure 4.2: Surface temperature/choice of binder for surface dressings ................................... 81
Figure 4.3: Determination of average Least Dimension ............................................................ 82
Figure 4.4: Surface Dressing Design Chart ............................................................................... 84
Figure 6.1: Road Drainage features ......................................................................................... 106
Figure 6.2: Nomograph for the Calculation of Headwater Depth with Inlet Control .............. 116
Figure 6.3: Headwater Losses for Concrete Pipe Culverts Flowing Full ................................ 117
Figure 6.4: Headwater Losses for Concrete Pipe Culverts Flowing Full ................................ 118
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
7/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
vi
viList of Design Charts
List of Design Charts
Chart 1: Granular Roadbase / Surface Dressing ........................................................................ 96
Chart 2: Composite Roadbase (Unbound & cemented) / Surface Dressing .............................. 97
Chart 3: Granular Roadbase / Semi-Structural Surface ............................................................. 98
Chart 4: Composite Roadbase / Semi-Structural Surface .......................................................... 99
Chart 5: Granular Roadbase / Structural Surface ..................................................................... 100
Chart 6: Composite Roadbase / Structural Surface .................................................................. 101
Chart 7: Bituminous Roadbase / Semi-Structural Surface ....................................................... 102
Chart 8: Cemented Roadbase / Surface Dressing .................................................................... 103
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
8/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
vii
viiAcronyms
Acronyms
AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic
AASHTO American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials
ADT Number of average daily traffic
ALD Average Least Dimension
CBR California Bearing Ratio
ESA Equivalent Standard Axle
GB3 Granular Base-material type 3
GIS Graphical Information Systems
HW Allowable Headwater depth
KUTIP Kampala Urban Transportation plan
LL Liquid Limit
LS Linear Shrinkage
M.S.A Millions of equivalent standard axle
MC Moisture Content
MDD Maximum Dry Density
OMC Optimum Moisture Content
ORN Overseas Road Note
PI Plasticity Index
PL Plastic Limit
TRRL Transport Road Research Laboratory
TW Tailwater depth
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
9/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
1
1Chapter One:
Chapter One:
Introduction to Pavement Design
General
A road is a path established over land for the passage of vehicles, people, and animals.
Roads provide dependable pathways for moving people and goods from one place to
another. They range in quality from dirt paths to concrete-paved multilane highways.
Roads are used by various forms of transportation, such as trucks, automobiles, buses,
motorcycles, and bicycles. Roads allow trucks to move goods from points of production,
such as fields and factories, directly to markets and shopping centres. Private individuals
rely on roads for safe and efficient automobile, motorcycle, and bicycle travel. Fire
departments, medical services, and other government agencies depend on an organized
system of roads to provide emergency services to the public in times of need [Urbanik,
2007].
There are many different types of roads, from multilane freeways and expressways to two-
way country roads. One important quality of a road is known as control of access. This
term describes how vehicles are allowed to enter and exit a road. By controlling access to
a road, the road can support more traffic at higher speeds. Roads can be classified into
three broad categories: highways, urban or city streets, and rural roads. Each type of road
controls access to different degrees. Each type also differs in location, the amount of
traffic it can safely support, and the speed at which traffic can safely travel.
To support heavy vehicles moving at high speeds, a modern road is made up of severallayers. Each layer helps the layers above it support the weight and pressure of moving
traffic. Roads that carry more traffic at higher speeds, like highways, are built to stronger
standards than roads that carry less traffic, such as rural collector roads. The number of
layers in a road often depends on the intended use of the road, but generally roads have
three distinct layers. From bottom to top, the layers are the subgrade (or roadbed), the
roadbase (or base course), and the Surfacing (or wearing course). These layers form part
of what is known as the pavement structure of a road [Urbanik, 2007].
Road traffic is carried by the pavement, which in engineering terms is a horizontal
structure consisting of superimposed layers of selected and processed material supported
by in-situ natural material.
The task before the pavement designer normally entails the development of the most
economical combination of layers that will guarantee adequate dispersion of the incident
wheel stresses so that each layer in the pavement does not become overstressed during the
design life of the highway. The major variables in design of a highway pavement are: the
type of vehicles in the traffic stream, the volume of traffic predicted to use the highway
over its design life, the strength of the underlying subgrade, the material contained within
each layer of the pavement and the thickness of each layer in the pavement [Rogers,
2003].
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
10/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
2
2Types of Pavements
In order for the pavement to support the design year traffic without exceeding its support
capacity existing records must be examined, possible routes surveyed, traffic flow
assessed, subsurface explorations conducted and appropriate materials selected. Based on
this information, a pavement structure can then be selected from a structure catalogue, the
maximum slopes for embankments and cuttings established, the degree of compaction to
be achieved during construction determined, and drainage needs specified before the
construction process is undertaken.
Before adopting any material for use within the pavement structure, the engineering
properties of the local rock and soil are established, particularly with respect to strength,
stiffness, durability, susceptibility to moisture, and propensity to shrink and swell over
time. The relevant properties are determined by either field tests, empirical estimates
based on soil type, or by laboratory measurements. The material is tested in its weakest
expected condition, usually at its highest moisture content. Probable performance under
traffic is then determined, soils unsuitable for the final pavement are identified for removal
and suitable replacement materials are reserved for use on the pavement [TRL, 1993].
1.1
Types of PavementsPavements are called either flexible or rigid depending on their relative flexural stiffness.
Two main types of pavements are usedbituminous, or flexible, pavement and concrete,
or rigid, pavement. Generally, bituminous pavements are cheaper and easier to construct,
but they require more maintenance. Concrete pavements, however, last for a very long
time with minimal upkeep but are much more expensive and time-consuming to build
[Urbanik, 2007].
a)Flexible PavementsThese pavements are rather flexible in their structural action under loading. They are
surfaced with bituminous or asphalt materials. Flexible pavements consist of several
layers of materials and rely on the combination of layers to transmit load to the subgrade.
As a result of this action, flexible pavements distribute load over a small area of subgrade.
b)Rigid PavementsRigid pavements are made of Portland Cement Concrete (PCC). The concrete slab ranges
in thickness from 6 to 14 inches (or 152.4 - 355.6mm). These types of pavements are
called rigid because they are substantially stiffer than flexible pavements due to the high
stiffness of PCC. As a result of this stiffness, rigid pavements tend to distribute load over a
relatively wide area of subgrade. The concrete slab that comprises a rigid pavement
supplies most of its structural capacity.
In deciding whether to use flexible or rigid pavements, engineers take into account the
following factors:
Traffic disruptions due to maintenance;
Riding characteristics;
Ease and cost of repair;
Effect of climatic conditions.
Lifetime costs.
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
11/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
3
3Elements of a Flexible Pavement
1.2 Elements of a Flexible PavementA flexible pavement is built up of layers namely; surfacing course, roadbase, sub-base,
capping layer and subgrade [Kadiyali, 2006].
Wearing Course
Subgrade
Base Course or Binder Course
Roadbase
Sub-base
Surfacing
Figure 1.1: Definition of Pavement layers
Source: TRL (1993)
a) SubgradeThis is the top surface of a roadbed on which the pavement structure and shoulders
including kerbs are constructed. Generally the top soil portion up to 500mm of the
embankment or cut section is referred to as the subgrade [Bindra, 1999].
It may be undisturbed local material or may be soil excavated elsewhere and placed as
fill. The loads on the pavement are ultimately received by the subgrade layer; it istherefore, essential that the layer should not be over-stressed. The top part of the layer
requires preparation to receive the layers above either by stabilizing it adequately (which
reduces the required pavement thickness) or designing and constructing a sufficiently
thick pavement to suit subgrade strength [TRL, 1993].
The subgrade strength depends on:
The type of material;
Moisture content;
Dry density;
Internal structure of the soil particles;
Type and mode of stress applied.
The major factors that influence pavement thickness are; design wheel load, strength of
subgrade (and other pavement materials), climatic and environmental factors [Singh,
2001].
b) Capping Layer (Selected or Improved Subgrade)A capping layer may consist of better quality subgrade material brought in from
somewhere else or from existing subgrade material improved by mechanical or chemical
stabilisation. It is usually justified where weak soils are encountered [TRL, 1993].
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
12/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
4
4Elements of a Flexible Pavement
c) Sub-baseThis is the secondary load-spreading layer underlying the roadbase. It will normally
consist of a material of lower quality than that used in the roadbase (but of higher quality
than the subgrade) such as unprocessed natural gravel, gravel-sand, or gravel-sand-clay.
It may or may not be present as a separate layer since its presence is justified by the
insufficiency of the subgrade or to enhance reliability of the pavement performance
[TRL, 1993].
The functions of this layer are to:
Distribute stresses to the subgrade - the sub base material must therefore be
stronger than the subgrade material;
Act as a drainage layer in case the subgrade is poor - A good drainage layer
should be able to drain very fast if water is logged, but also must be able to retain
some moisture in times of extreme drought;
Prevent capillary attraction effect;
Serve as a separating layer preventing contamination of the roadbase by the
subgrade material;
Protect the subgrade from damage by construction traffic especially under wet
conditions.
The sub-base is omitted when the subgrade is a hard intact rock or if it is granular and
has a CBR greater than 30% and without a high water table [TRL, 1993].
d) RoadbaseThe roadbase is the main load-spreading layer of the pavement. It is structurally the most
important layer of a flexible pavement. It distributes the applied wheel load to the
subgrade in such a way that the bearing capacity of the subgrade soil is not exceeded.
This layer requires higher quality material often obtained by stabilizing sub-base
materials. It will normally consist of crushed stone or gravel, or of gravely soils,
decomposed rock, sands and sand-clays stabilised with cement, lime or bitumen [TRL,
1993].
e) SurfacingThe surfacing forms the topmost solid layer of the pavement usually designed to be
smooth and to withstand erosion from traffic and weather [Urbanik, 2007].
It usually consists of a bituminous surface dressing or a layer of premixed bituminous
material. It is comparatively thin, but resists abrasion and the impacts caused by wheel
loads and the effects of weather condition [Bindra, 1999].
The functions of this layer are to:
Provide a safe and comfortable riding surface to traffic;
Take up wear and tear stresses caused by traffic; Provide a water tight surface against infiltration of water;
Provide a hard surface which can withstand tyre pressure.
Where premixed materials are laid in two layers, these are known as the wearing course
and the base course (or binder course) as shown in Figure 1.1 [TRL, 1993].
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
13/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
5
5Overview of the Design Process
1.3 Overview of the Design ProcessORN31 (TRL, 1993) sums up the overall process of pavement design as constituting the
following major activities:
1. Surveying possible routes - which are part of the feasibility study process;
2. Assessing traffic;
3. Measuring subgrade strength;
4. Selecting pavement materials;
5.
Selecting the type of pavement structure with subsequent design of the drainagesystem. This is then followed by the actual implementation of the project.
However, the three major steps to be followed in designing a new road pavement are:
Traffic Assessment; which involves estimation of the amount of traffic and the
cumulative number of equivalent standard axles that will use the road over the
selected design life;
Subgrade strength assessment; which entails assessing the strength of the
subgrade soil over which the road is to be built;
Material selection;which involves the selection of the most economical
combination of pavement materials and layer thicknesses that will provide
satisfactory service over the design life of the pavement. It is usually necessary toassume that an appropriate level of maintenance is also carried out throughout the
design life of the road [TRL, 1993].
The following chapters will consider each of these steps in turn and put special emphasis
on five aspects of design that are of major significance in designing roads in most tropical
countries:
The influence of tropical climates on moisture conditions in road subgrades;
The severe conditions imposed on exposed bituminous surfacing materials by
tropical climates and the implications of this for the design of such surfacing;
The interrelationship between design and maintenance. If an appropriate level of
maintenance cannot be assumed, it is not possible to produce designs that will
carry the anticipated traffic loading without high costs to vehicle operators throughincreased road deterioration;
The high axle loads and tyre pressures which are common in most countries;
The influence of tropical climates on the nature of the soils and rocks used in road
building.
The overall process of designing a road is illustrated in Figure 1.2. Some of the
information necessary to carry out the tasks may be available from other sources e.g. from
a feasibility study or from Ministry records, but all existing data will need to be checked
carefully to ensure that it is both up-to-date and accurate. Likely problem areas are
highlighted in the relevant chapters of these notes.
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
14/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
6
6Overview of the Design Process
Figure 1.2: The Pavement Design Process
Source: TRL (1993)
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
15/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
7
7Design Approaches
1.4 Design ApproachesThere are two basic approaches to design namely empirical and semi-empirical methods
[Arora, 2000].
Empirical methods include:
Group index method;
CBR method (or thickness design method)
Semi - empirical methods include:
AASHTO method;
Tri-axial test;
Nottingham method;
California Resistance Value Test;
McLeod method; and
Banister method.
In Uganda, the AASHTO and Thickness design methods are most commonly applied.
These methods will be looked at in more detail during the assessment of subgrade
strength. The Group index method is limited as it considers only the particle distributionof the soil and its atterberg limits.
1.5 Design Standardsa) General
Design of flexible pavements in Uganda has been based on a number of design standards
that include the TRL, Overseas Road Note 31 (1993), Uganda Road Design Manual
(2005), the Kenya Road Design Manual and the American Association of State Highways
and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) interim guides for design of pavement structures
1972-1986. The latest version of the AASHTO design guide was printed in 1993. The
above design guides have been adopted to suit most materials and climatic conditions
found in developing countries. The AASHTO design equation in the design guide 1972-
1986 was also modified through research done by the World Bank to suit conditions in
developing countries.
b) Uganda Road Design ManualThe Uganda Road Design Manual 2005 has incorporated the pavement design guide
prepared for SATCC countries. The SATCC design guide was developed for Southern
Africa Transport and Communication Commission for use in Tanzania, Zambia,
Zimbabwe Mozambique, Malawi, Swaziland, Lesotho, Angola, and Botswana [Thagesen,
1996]. The method follows the AASHTO design concept as set forth in AASHTO interim
guides for design of pavement structures 1972-1986 published by the American
Association of State Highways and Transport Officials. The pavement strength requiredfor a given combination of subgrade bearing capacity, traffic load, service level and
climate is expressed by means of the subgrade structural number. Layer coefficients,
according to the position in the structure, are given to determine the structural number of
the pavement. For each type of pavement, the thickness of the base and sub base layers are
determined so that the required structural number is satisfied [Uganda Road Design
Manual, 1994].
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
16/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
8
8Questions
c) Kenya Road Design ManualThe materials and pavement design in the Kenya Road Design Manual sets forth the
standards for structural design of new bitumen surfaced roads in Kenya. The Kenya Road
Design Manual includes design of gravel wearing course on unpaved roads.
d) TRL Overseas Road Note (ORN) 31The British Transportation and Road Research Laboratory (TRRL) published the first
version of Road Note 31 in 1962 and subsequently revised it in 1976 and 1977. The Road
Note 31 has in 1993 undergone a comprehensive revision by the transport research
laboratory (TRL) and now includes the structural catalogue where a layer thickness can be
selected for a whole range of common pavement combinations. The guidelines are based
on an empirical method taking into account the organisations vast experience in
understanding the behaviour of road building materials and their interactions in composite
pavements.
e) Conclusive RemarkIt is important for engineers, especially those in developing countries like Uganda, to
exercise judgement in the use of a given design standard to ensure that they come up with
an economical solution for a pavement design. Use of local materials has to always be
taken into consideration. Sometimes, more than one design standard is used for the
purposes of comparing one pavement design with another so that the comparison guides
the engineer in selecting the most economical option.
1.6 Questionsa) In less than 300 words, write an executive summary about the pavement design process.
b) Discuss the elements that make up a flexible pavement structure and their significance.
c) Discuss the three major activities that constitute the pavement design process.
d)
Mr. Juan Chvez Fernndez is a Spanish Highway Consultant who wishes to open up anew Highway Engineering firm in Kampala. He is faced with a problem of deciding
which highway design standards he should use in order to come up with the most
economical pavement designs. Using the knowledge you have acquired from your recent
training in highway engineering, advice Mr. Fernndez.
1.7 Bibliography1. Arora, K. R., 2000, Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 5
thEdition.
2. Bindra, S.P, 1999, A Course in Highway Engineering, 4th
Edition, Dhanpat Rai
Publishers, New Delhi.
3.
Gupta, B.L., 1995, Roads, railways Bridges and Tunnels engineering, 4th
edition,Standard publishers Distributors, Nai sarak, Delhi.
4. Kadiyali, L.R., 2006. Principles and Practices of Highway Engineering (including
Expressways and Airport Engineering), 4th
Edition. Khanna Publishers, New Delhi.
5. Ministry of Works, and Transport, 1994. Road Design Manual, Republic of Uganda,
Kampala.
6. OFlaherty C.A., 2002.Highways: The Location, Design, Construction and Maintenance
of Pavements.4th
Edition, Oxford, Butterworth Heinemann.
7. Rogers, M., 2003,Highway Engineering, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
17/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
9
9
8. Ruhweza, D., 2005, Highway Engineering I. Lecture notes, Department of Civil
Engineering, Kyambogo University.
9. Singh, G., 2001,Highway Engineering, 3rd
edition, Standard publishers and Distributors,
Delhi.
10.Transport Research Laboratory, 1993,A Guide to Design of Bitumen Surfaced Roads in
Tropical and Sub Tropical Countries, Overseas Road Note 31, Crowthorne, England.
11.Urbanik, T., 2007, Road", Microsoft Student 2008 [DVD]. Redmond, WA: Microsoft
Corporation.
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
18/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
10
10Chapter Two:
Chapter Two:
Traffic Assessment
2.1 GeneralOn completion of the route location process (not discussed in these notes), the designer is
then expected to estimate the amount of traffic and the cumulative number of equivalent
standard axles that will use the road over the selected design life. In this step, other sub-
activities include: measurement of traffic volume by class; measurement of axle loads;
choosing the design life and the calculation of the total traffic in esa or msa. The final step
at this stage is the assignment of a traffic class to the amount of traffic ascertained with
guidance from the structure catalogue in chapter five.
It should be noted that information on traffic flow of vehicles past a given point in a
specified time period provides a key input to decisions on the planning, design and
operation of transport systems. This data is used in highway planning and helps in thedesign of road pavements, establishment of control measures, carrying out of cost benefit
analyses and studying accident patterns in relation to traffic volume. Accuracy of traffic
flow data is therefore extremely critical as any inaccurate data is useless for any design
purposes [OFlaherty, 2002].
2.2 Estimation of Traffic Flows (F)a) Introduction
Generally, heavier loads require thicker pavements provided other design factors remain
constant. The structural design of a pavement largely depends on the traffic (or design
wheel load) projected to use that pavement. In design of a pavement, knowledge of themaximum wheel load is more important than gross weight of vehicles [Gupta, 1999].
During design, emphasis is placed on commercial and heavy goods vehicles whose axle
weight is greater than 1,500 kg. It is these classes of vehicle that are most damaging to the
pavement making their volumes a critical parameter in design [TRL, 1993]. When
designing a new road, the total flow of commercial vehicles in one direction per day at the
roads opening are normally required in order to determine the cumulative design traffic
over the design life. For purposes of pavement design, vehicles weighing less than 1500
kg may be ignored. If the traffic flow figures available are for two way flow, the
directional split is assumed to be in ratio 1:2 (in favour of the heavily trafficked lane)
unless traffic studies show otherwise [Kadiyali, 2006].
The distribution of commercial vehicle traffic can be expected to vary at particular points
along the road e.g. where lanes leave or join a carriageway, or at traffic signals or at
roundabouts. Nonetheless in the design of new roads the traffic distribution considered is
that away from junctions. All lanes are designed to carry the heaviest traffic load assessed
from the most trafficked lane.
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
19/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
11
11Estimation of Traffic Flows (F)
b) Baseline Traffic Flows (Fo)In order to determine the total traffic over the design life of the road, the first step is to
estimate baseline traffic flows. The estimate should be the (Annual) Average Daily Traffic
(AADT) currently using the route, classified into the vehicle categories of cars, light
goods vehicles, trucks (heavy goods vehicles) and buses. The AADT is defined as the total
annual traffic summed for bothdirections and divided by 365. It is usually obtained by
recording actual traffic flows over a shorter period from which the AADT is then
estimated. For long projects, large differences in traffic along the road may make itnecessary to estimate the flow at several locations. It should be noted that for structural
design purposes the traffic loading in onedirection is required and for this reason care is
always required when interpreting AADT figures. Traffic counts carried out over a short
period as a basis for estimating the traffic flow can produce estimates which are subject to
large errors because traffic flows can have large daily, weekly, monthly and seasonal
variations. The daily variability in traffic flow depends on the volume of traffic. It
increases as traffic levels fall, with high variability on roads carrying less than 1000
vehicles per day.
In order to reduce error, it is recommended that traffic counts to establish ADT at a
specific site conform to the following practice:
i) The counts are for seven consecutive days.ii) The counts on some of the days are for a full 24 hours, with preferably at least one
24-hour count on a weekday and one during a weekend. On the other days 16-hour
counts should be sufficient. These should be grossed up to 24-hour values in the
same proportion as the 16-hour/24 hour split on those days when full 24-hour counts
have been undertaken.
iii)Counts are avoided at times when travel activity is abnormal for short periods due tothe payment of wages and salaries, public holidays, etc. If abnormal traffic flows
persist for extended periods, for example during harvest times, additional counts
need to be made to ensure this traffic is properly included.
iv) If possible, the seven-day counts should be repeated several times throughout theyear [TRL, 1993].
The following steps are generally taken when carrying out a traffic survey;
i) Traffic count data sheets are made indicating the classification of vehicles, i.e. cars,pick-ups, minibuses, buses, trucks and trailers (See figure 2.1 for a sample of a
classified count data sheet);
ii) Traffic count stations along the road are then identified;iii)Enumerators who are trained to carry out the traffic survey are positioned at the
identified station.
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
20/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
12
12Estimation of Traffic Flows (F)
Figure 2.1: Form for Manual Classified CountsSource: TRL (2004)
c) Projected Traffic (Fp)Forecasting traffic growth is a difficult exercise and may involve uncertainty in growth
predictions. Some factors considered include economic growth, vehicle growth, and land
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
21/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
13
13Estimation of Traffic Flows (F)
use development. These factors are considered together with traffic modelling. To reduce
this uncertainty, sensitivity and risk analyses are involved in the process [TRL, 1993].
Even with a developed economy and stable economic conditions, traffic forecasting is an
uncertain process. In a developing economy the problem becomes more difficult because
such economies are often very sensitive to the world prices of just one or two
commodities.
In order to forecast traffic growth it is necessary to separate traffic into the following
three categories:
a) Normal traffic;Traffic which would pass along the existing road or track even if nonew pavement were provided.
b) Diverted traffic;Traffic that changes from another route (or mode of transport) tothe project road because of the improved pavement, but still travels between the
same origin and destination.
c) Generated traffic;Additional traffic which occurs in response to the provision orimprovement of the road.
For existing roads, the greatest traffic contribution is from the normal traffic. We shall
therefore only examine the methods used to forecast normal traffic (The student isencouraged to find out how the other two types of traffic are forecast).
The commonest method of forecasting normal traffic is to extrapolate time series data on
traffic levels and assume that growth will either remain constant in absolute terms i.e. a
fixed number of vehicles per year (a linear extrapolation), or constant in relative terms
i.e. a fixed percentage increase [TRL, 1993].
A constant growth rate formula shown below is normally used to project the traffic to the
design year.
1
.2.1
Where,
Fp = Cumulative number of commercial vehicles after n years
Fo = Present number of vehicles after the traffic survey;
r = Growth rate of commercial vehicles;
n = Number of years of projection.
d) Axle Loading (W)i) Axle Equivalency
The damage that vehicles do to a road depends very strongly on the axle loads of the
vehicles. For pavement design purposes the damaging power of axles is related to a
'standard' axle of 8.16 tonnes using equivalence factors which have been derived from
empirical studies. In order to determine the cumulative axle load damage that a
pavement will sustain during its design life, it is necessary to express the total number of
heavy vehicles that will use the road over this period in terms of the cumulative number
of equivalent standard axles (esa). Axle load surveys must be carried out to determine
the axle load distribution of a sample of the heavy vehicles using the road. Data collected
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
22/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
14
14Estimation of Traffic Flows (F)
from these surveys are used to calculate the mean number of equivalent standard axles
for a typical vehicle in each class. The axle loading for each category of commercial
vehicle is the sum of the front and rear axles. For commercial vehicles with more than
one rear axle, the total equivalent standard axle for the vehicle will be the sum of the
front and each of the rear equivalent standard axles. These values are then used in
conjunction with traffic forecasts to determine the predicted cumulative equivalent
standard axles that the road will carry over its design life. The wear factor can be
calculated from the following equation;
, 8.16 . . . . 2.2
ii) Axle Load SurveysIf no recent axle load data is available, it is recommended that axle load surveys of heavy
vehicles are undertaken whenever a major road project is being designed. Ideally, several
surveys at periods which will reflect seasonal changes in the magnitude of axle loads are
recommended. It is also recommended that axle load surveys are carried out by weighing
a sample of vehicles at the roadside. The sample should be chosen such that a maximum
of about 60 vehicles per hour are weighed. The weighing site should be level and, if
possible, constructed in such a way that vehicles are pulled clear of the road when being
weighed. The portable weighbridge should be mounted in a small pit with its surface
levelwith the surrounding area. This ensures that all of the wheels of the vehicle being
weighed are level and eliminates the errors which can be introduced by even a small
twist or tilt of the vehicle.
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
23/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
15
15Estimation of Traffic Flows (F)
Figure 2.2: Axle Load Survey Form A for recording vehicle survey data
Source: TRL (2004)
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
24/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
16
16Estimation of Traffic Flows (F)
Figure 2.3: Axle Load Survey Form B for recording vehicle wheel loads
Source: TRL (2004)
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
25/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
17
17Estimation of Traffic Flows (F)
e) Growth Factor (G)Growth is assumed to be compound over the design period. The Portland Cement
Association developed a formula that applies traffic at the middle of the design period as
the design traffic as shown below;
1 . .2.3 Where;
G = the growth factor;
r = the growth rate; and
n = the design period
The Asphalt Institute and the AASHTO Design Guide recommend the use of traffic
over the entire design period to determine the total growth factor as follows;
1 1. . 2.4
Where; G, r and n are as previously defined.
f) Design Life (Y)The design period is the time during which the road will accommodate traffic at a
satisfactory level of service without requiring capital intervention (or further funding) in
the form of rehabilitation or strengthening. For most road projects an economic analysis
period of between 10 and 20 years from the date of opening is appropriate, but for major
projects this period should be tested as part of the appraisal process discussed in
Overseas Road Note 5, TRL (1988). Below is a table used to guide the pavement
designer in choosing the appropriate design life as recommended by the Ministry of
Works and Transport, Pavement Design Manual (2005).
Table 2.1: Selection of Design Life
Source: Uganda Road Design Manual (2005)
A pavement design life of 15 years also reduces the problem of forecasting uncertain
traffic trends for long periods into the future. It should be noted that design life does not
mean that at the end of the period the pavement will be completely worn out and in need
of reconstruction; it means that towards the end of the period the pavement will need tobe strengthened so that it can continue to carry traffic satisfactorily for a further period.
Low High
Low 10 - 15 yrs 15 yrs
High 10 - 20 yrs 15 - 20 yrs
Importance/Level of ServiceDesign Data
Relibility
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
26/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
18
18Determination of Cumulative Standard Axles (T)
2.3 Determination of Cumulative Standard Axles (T)A successful outcome of the pavement design process in any given instance is dependent
upon the accuracy with which the total number of standard axle loads, and their
cumulative wear or damage effects, can be predicted for the design lane(s) over the period
of the selected design life. Below is a summary of the steps involved in carrying out a full
traffic assessment:
a)
Estimate the present one-way commercial vehicle flow or the traffic flow, F, at theopening of a new road. For each class of vehicles select the initial design period Y;
b) Determine the appropriate average wear factor, W, to be used with each vehicle class;
c) Determine the growth factor, G, for each category of vehicle;
d) Calculate the cumulative design traffic in each vehicle class using the equation shown
below:
.2.5 Where;
365 10
. 2.6
And;
i = vehicle class
Note:
In case of a two-way single carriage-way pavement, the total design traffic, T, is the
summation of the cumulative design traffic in each category in a given direction.
In case of a dual carriageway road the proportion of vehicles in the most heavily trafficked
lane is normally obtained and applied to the total accumulation to derive the design traffic.
g) Channelization Factor (Ch)In certain cases, the equation for the cumulative design traffic includes a channelization
factor, thus Ti= 365 F.W.G.Y.Ch (10-6
) msa. In the urban area it is relevant to consider
the effects of vehicle channelization which may be caused by various factors. In 1983 the
County Surveyors Society report entitled Vehicle Damage Factors Present, Past and
Future Values indicated that where the normal tendency for transverse wander is
constrained by, for example , traffic islands then the damaging effect can be at least
twice that normally expected. In narrow urban streets where one street parking is
permitted there is a tendency for buses and Heavy Goods Vehicles (HGVs) to use the
same wheel tracks when passing in both directions [Ruhweza, 2005].
The effect of bus stop areas is another location where an increased axle load factor may
be relevant. The same applies to traffic signal junctions and roundabouts. In the case of
long severe gradients where there are significant HGV flows, there is an indication that
the normal damaging effect calculations may not be adequate. The following overall
multipliers are suggested:
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
27/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
19
19Example 2.1: Traffic Assessment
Table 2.2: Axle Factor Multipliers
Effect Multiplier
Traffic island 2.0
Parking 2.0
Traffic Signals 1.5
Roundabouts 1.5
Severe Bends 1.5
Steep Hill 2.0 Source: County Surveyors Society (1983)
N.B: It is usually advised that the total multiplier used should not exceed 3.0. In certain
locations and circumstances, it may be appropriate to consider the multipliers to be
cumulative. Table 2.3 below shows the various traffic classes and their corresponding
equivalent standard axles, in msa.
Table 2.3: Traffic Classes
Traffic Classes Ranges (msa)
T1 < 0.3
T2 0.3 - 0.7
T3 0.7 - 1.5
T4 1.5 - 3.0T5 3.0 - 6.0
T6 6.0 - 10
T7 10 - 17
T8 17 - 30
Source: TRL (1993)
2.4 Example 2.1: Traffic AssessmentThe Kampala Gayaza road is in a state of failure and is due for reconstruction. Tables
2.4 and 2.5 below show the results of a traffic survey at different stations on the above
road. The survey was carried out on 1st January, 2008 and construction is to begin in
December, 2009. The road is expected to be opened to traffic on 1stJanuary, 2010.
Table 2.4: Two-Way Traffic Volume at the Project Road (in vehicles/day)
Table 2.5: Axle Weights (in tonnes)
Description Mini Buses Buses Pick-Ups Cars 2-AxleTrucks 3-AxleTrucksGross Weight (t) 3.00 15.00 3.00 12.00 20.00
Front Axle Load (t) 1.00 3.00 1.00 4.00 4.00
Rear Axle Load 1 (t) 2.00 6.00 2.00 8.00 8.00
Rear Axle Load 2 (t) - 6.00 - - 8.00
Considering the design traffic loading at station D and assuming a 15 year design
period, design the pavement using the TRL approach. (Assume that the traffic grows at
the rates indicated for each vehicle class in Table 2.4 above).
Growth Rate
A B C D r%
Minibuses 4,013 2,271 4,647 4,507 6.0%
Buses 220 82 5 3 4.5%
Pick-Ups 850 348 1,621 1,845 6.0%
2-Axle Trucks 182 255 447 507 5.0%
3-Axle Trucks 23 11 73 44 4.0%
Total 5,288 2,967 6,793 6,906
Vehicle Class Station
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
28/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
20
20Example 2.1: Traffic Assessment
Solution
1.0 Design Information(a)Traffic growth rate, r = 6%
(b)Design life, Y = 15 yrs
(c)Construction Period, n = 2 yrs (2010 2008)
2.0 Determination of cumulative design traffic, T
Where; 365 10 2.1 Unidirectional traffic Flow, F
Assuming a 1:2 directional traffic split, then;
23 of the trafic volume for each vehicle classe.g. for minibuses at station D;
234508 3005 veh/day 3005 10.06 3376 veh/day
2.2 Wear factor, WFrom equation 2.2
,
8.16 .
e.g. for minibuses at station D;
1.008.16. 2.008.16
. 0.0001 0.0018 0.0019
2.3 Growth Factor, GAccording to the Portland Cement Association (equation 2.3); the growth factor
for minibuses at station D is given by;
1 0.06.
1.5481
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
29/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
21
21Questions
2.4 Table of results
From table 2.3 a cumulative design traffic of 3.335 msa corresponds to a traffic
class of T5i.e. 3.0 < T (in msa) < 6.0.
2.5 Questionsa) On 1
st December 2006, Mr. Fernndez was awarded a contract to upgrade Kansanga
Lukuli road, which is in an alarming state of failure, to a bituminous surfaced road. He
now wishes to carry out a baseline traffic survey together with an axle load survey to
ascertain the amount of traffic currently using the road and the amount of axle loading onthe project road respectively. Describe in detail how you would expect him to carry out the
above surveys in preparation for pavement design.
b) Upon completion of the surveys in part (b) above, Mr. Fernndez summarised his findings
in Table 2.6 to Table 2.9 below. The tables show the results of the traffic and axle load
surveys at station A on the project road. The survey was carried out in December, 2007
and construction is to begin in January, 2009. The road is expected to be opened to traffic
on 31stDecember, 2012 with traffic projected to grow at a rate of 4%. Ascertain the design
traffic loading for station A assuming that the design data reliability is low yet the
expected level of service is high. Assign a traffic class to this section and comment on
your results.
Table 2.6: Axle Loads (in tons)
Gross Front Rear Rear
Weight Axle Axle 1 Axle 2
(tons) (tons) (tons) (tons)
Vans, PickUps & 4WDs 3.00 1.00 2.00
Minibuses and Matatus 3.00 1.00 2.00
Coasters 3.00 1.00 2.00
Buses 9.00 3.00 6.00
Dynas and Tractors 12.00 4.00 8.00
2-Axle Trucks 12.00 4.00 8.00
3-Axle Trucks 20.00 4.00 8.00 8.00
Axle Load Weights (in tons)
Vehicle Class
Front Axle Rear 1 Rear 2 Rate, r Fo Fp W G Y Ti
(esa) (esa) (esa) % (Veh/d) (Veh/d) (esa) (yrs) (msa)
Minibuses 0.0001 0.0018 0.0000 6.0% 3,005 3,376 0.0019 1.5481 15 0.053
Buses 0.0111 0.2507 0.2507 4.5% 2 2 0.5124 1.3911 15 0.008
Pick-Ups 0.0001 0.0018 0.0000 6.0% 1,230 1,382 0.0019 1.5481 15 0.022
2-Axle Trucks 0.0404 0.9147 0.0000 5.0% 338 373 0.9552 1.4418 15 2.8133-Axle Trucks 0.0404 0.9147 0.9147 4.0% 29 32 1.8699 1.3420 15 0.440
3.335Cumulative Design Traffic, T (in msa)
Wear Factor, W F
Vehicle Class
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
30/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
22
22Questions
Table 2.7: Friday 24-hr count summaryLight Goods Vehcles Heavy Commercial Goods Vehicles Two Wheeled
Duration Saloon Vans, Pick- Minibuses Coasters Buses Dynas & Truck Truck Motor Bicycles Carts
of count Cars Ups & 4WD & Matatus Tractors 2-Axle 3-Axle Cycles
07:00-08:00 a.m. 136 125 100 3 0 6 1 0 68 19 0
08:00-09:00 111 144 70 0 0 2 4 0 109 14 0
09:00-10:00 50 57 34 0 1 1 3 0 0 12 0
10:00-11:00 69 65 24 1 0 6 0 0 63 10 1
11:00-12:00 p.m. 40 47 30 1 0 4 9 0 60 5 0
12:00-01:00 41 50 32 5 0 0 4 0 67 11 0
01:00-02:00 25 44 23 1 0 3 3 0 53 5 002:00-03:00 58 79 44 2 0 0 4 0 38 3 1
03:00-04:00 98 120 52 3 0 3 0 0 63 5 0
04:00-05:00 50 49 27 5 0 7 2 0 61 5 0
05:00-06:00 34 55 40 3 0 4 1 0 62 8 0
06:00-07:00 41 43 38 1 0 2 0 0 60 9 0
07:00-08:00 52 41 27 0 0 5 2 0 84 8 0
08:00-09:00 46 26 34 0 0 2 0 0 124 3 0
09:00-10:00 38 24 35 0 0 2 1 0 102 6 010:00-11:00 55 32 55 0 0 1 0 0 84 2 0
11:00-12:00 a.m. 27 12 25 0 0 0 1 0 65 2 0
12:00-01:00 19 3 17 0 0 0 1 0 74 1 0
01:00-02:00 9 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0
02:00-03:00 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0
03:00-04:00 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0
04:00-05:00 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 41 0 0
05:00-06:00 11 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 43 2 0
06:00-07:00 18 3 26 0 0 2 0 0 36 8 0
Table 2.8: Sunday 24-hr count summaryLight Goods Vehcles Heavy Commercial Goods Vehicles Two Wheeled
Duration Saloon Vans, Pick- Minibuses Coasters Buses Dynas & Truck Truck Motor Bicycles Carts
of count Cars Ups & 4WD & Matatus Tractors 2-Axle 3-Axle Cycles
07:00-08:00 a.m. 9 19 38 0 0 6 1 0 59 11 1
08:00-09:00 30 25 23 0 0 1 0 0 28 15 0
09:00-10:00 43 58 32 0 0 4 0 0 88 10 0
10:00-11:00 38 50 32 0 0 4 0 0 111 4 0
11:00-12:00 p.m 48 57 21 1 0 2 0 0 72 5 2
12:00-01:00 45 58 23 1 0 4 0 0 58 12 1
01:00-02:00 48 62 32 0 0 4 0 0 66 6 0
02:00-03:00 50 74 33 1 0 1 0 0 56 9 0
03:00-04:00 34 41 27 0 0 4 0 0 44 2 0
04:00-05:00 32 48 28 1 0 7 0 0 56 9 0
05:00-06:00 50 42 34 0 0 0 0 0 50 4 0
06:00-07:00 60 36 37 0 0 0 3 0 43 0 1
07:00-08:00 53 52 49 1 0 3 1 0 84 8 0
08:00-09:00 41 36 51 0 0 5 1 0 77 8 0
09:00-10:00 38 16 45 0 0 3 1 o 44 1 110:00-11:00 33 10 34 0 0 1 0 0 46 0 0
11:00-12:00 a.m. 11 12 30 0 0 0 0 0 56 3 0
12:00-01:00 18 4 21 0 0 0 0 0 49 1 0
01:00-02:00 3 3 9 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0
02:00-03:00 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0
03:00-04:00 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0
04:00-05:00 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0
05:00-06:00 4 3 12 0 0 0 1 0 30 2 0
06:00-07:00 28 18 38 1 0 2 0 0 40 11 0
Table 2.9: 16-hr counts on the remaining daysDay Saloon Vans, Pick- Minibuses Coasters Buses Dynas & Truck Truck Motor Bicycles CartsCars Ups & 4WD & Matatus Tractors 2-Axle 3-Axle Cycles
WED 921 836 553 17 0 89 18 1 1080 142 10
THU 1044 1236 950 60 0 91 51 2 1482 240 8
SAT 646 576 606 39 0 71 8 0 1183 119 2
MON 804 3290 785 16 2 54 41 5 1281 130 9
TUE 974 1075 671 16 2 52 59 4 1259 152 1
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
31/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
23
23Bibliography
2.6 Bibliography1. Kadiyali, L.R., 2006. Principles and Practices of Highway Engineering (including
Expressways and Airport Engineering), 4th
Edition. Khanna Publishers, New Delhi.
2. Ministry of Works, and Transport, 2005.Road Design ManualVol.III, Pavement Design
Manual, Republic of Uganda, Kampala.
3. OFlaherty C.A., 2002. Highways: The Location, Design, Construction and
Maintenance of Pavements.4th
Edition, Oxford, Butterworth Heinemann.4. Ruhweza, D., 2005, Highway Engineering I. Lecture notes, Department of Civil
Engineering, Kyambogo University.
5. Transport Research Laboratory, 1993,A Guide to Design of Bitumen Surfaced Roads in
Tropical and Sub Tropical Countries, Overseas Road Note 31, Crowthorne, England.
6. Transport Research Laboratory, 2004,A Guide to Axle Load Surveys and Traffic Countsfor Determining Traffic Loading on Pavements, Overseas Road Note 40, Crowthorne,
England.
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
32/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
24
24Chapter Three:
Chapter Three:
Subgrade Strength Assessment
4.1 GeneralThis third stage of the pavement design process can be carried out concurrently with the
traffic assessment immediately following the route location process. The sub-activities
involved in assessing the subgrade strength of the soil are: Assignment of climatic a
regime, testing of soils, definition of uniform sections, and designing of earth works [TRL,
1993].
Properties of the subgrade soil are important in designing the depth of the pavement.
Weak subgrade material requires higher thickness to protect it from traffic loads.
Pavement deformation mainly depends on the subgrade properties and drainage. During
design and construction, proper drainage has to be maintained in order to control
pavement deformation.
Climatic factors are important here because rainfall affects the moisture of the subgrade
and pavement layers. The daily and seasonal variations of rainfall are important in the
design and performance of the pavement. Where the water table is close to the formation
level of the roads, adjustments in the design of the pavement layer thicknesses are
necessary. Embankment heights and the depth of water table below the embankment have
an effect on the performance of an embankment and must be examined [Kadiyali, 2000,
Arora, 2000].
The strength of road subgrades is commonly assessed in terms of the California Bearing
Ratio (CBR) and this is dependent on the type of soil, its density, and its moisture content.
For designing the thickness of a road pavement, the strength of the subgrade should betaken as that of the soil at a moisture content equal to the wettest moisture condition likely
to occur in the subgrade after the road is opened to traffic. In the tropics, subgrade
moisture conditions under impermeableroad pavements can be classified into three main
categories. Some of the key tests in the design of the subgrade include the Compaction
test, the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer test and the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test.
4.2 Climatic Regimea) Category (1)
Category (1) subgrades are those in which the water table is sufficiently close to the
ground surface to control the subgrade moisture content. The type of subgrade soilgoverns the depth below the road surface at which a water table becomes the dominant
influence on the subgrade moisture content. For example, in non-plastic soils the water
table will dominate the subgrade moisture content when it rises to within 1 m of the road
surface, in sandy clays (PI40 per cent) the water table will
dominate when it rises to within 7m of the road surface. In addition to areas where the
water table is maintained by rainfall, this category includes coastal strips and flood plains
where the water table is maintained by the sea, by a lake or by a river.
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
33/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
25
25Testing Subgrade Soils
b) Category (2)Category (2) subgrades are those with deep water tables and where rainfall is sufficient to
produce significant changes in moisture conditions under the road. These conditions occur
when rainfall exceeds evapotranspiration for at least two months of the year. The rainfall
in such areas is usually greater than 250 mm per year and is often seasonal.
c) Category (3)Category (3) subgrades are those in areas with no permanent water table near the groundsurface and where the climate is dry throughout most of the year with an annual rainfall of
250 mm or less.
Direct assessment of the likely strength or CBR of the subgrade soil is often difficult to
make but its value can be inferred from an estimate of the density and equilibrium (or
ultimate) moisture content of the subgrade together with knowledge of the relationship
between strength, density and moisture content for the soil in question. This relationship
must be determined in the Laboratory.
The density of the subgrade soil can be controlled within limits by compaction at suitable
moisture content at the time of construction. The moisture content of the subgrade soil is
governed by the local climate and the depth of the water table below the road surface. Inmost circumstances, the first task is therefore to estimate the equilibrium moisture content.
A method of direct assessment of the subgrade strength, where this is possible, will be
discussed later together with less precise methods of estimation which can be used if
facilities for carrying out the full procedure are not available.
d) Equilibrium Moisture ContentAn impervious road surface isolates soil from rainfall, evaporation and plant transpiration.
After the construction of an impervious pavement, the moisture content within the soil
tends to settle to a set of more or less steady values. For each depth there is a particular set
of values referred to as the equilibrium moisture content. It has a value between the wetter
and drier values of moisture content in an unprotected subgrade during the wetter and drier
months respectively. For economic reasons, a roadway should be designed to suit the
subgrade when it has reached equilibrium moisture content conditions. For small works
the equilibrium moisture content can be taken as being equal to the moisture content
occurring in the natural soil at a depth of 1m, provided that this soil is the same as the soil
that will be the formation level [Ruhweza, 2005].
4.3 Testing Subgrade SoilsBefore the subgrade strength can be determined the probable equilibrium moisture content
of the pavement during its design life must be determined.
a) Equilibrium Moisture ContentCategory (1);The easiest method of estimating the design subgrade moisture content is to
measure the moisture content in subgrades below existing pavements in similar situations
at the time of the year when the water table is at its highest level. These pavements should
be greater than 3m wide and more than two years old and samples should preferably be
taken from under the carriageway about 0.5m from the edge. Allowance can be made for
different soil types by virtue of the fact that the ratio of subgrade moisture content to
plastic limit is the same for different subgrade soils when the water table and climatic
conditions are similar. If there is no suitable road in the vicinity, the moisture content in
the subgrade under an impermeable pavement can be estimated from knowledge of the
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
34/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
26
26Testing Subgrade Soils
depth of the water table and the relationship between suction and moisture content for the
subgrade soil [TRL, 1993]. The test apparatus required for determining this relationship is
straightforward and the method is described below:
The subgrade moisture content under an impermeable road pavement can increase after
construction where a water table exists close to the ground surface. This ultimate moisture
content can be predicted from the measured relationship between soil suction and moisture
content for the particular soil and knowledge of the depth of water table. Measuring thecomplete relationship between suction and moisture content is time consuming and a
simpler, single measurement procedure can be used. A small sample of soil, compacted to
field density and moisture content, is placed within suitable laboratory equipment that can
apply a pressure equivalent to the 'effective depth' of the water table (e.g. a pressure plate
extractor). The 'effective depth' of the water table for design purposes comprises the actual
depth from the subgrade to the water table plus an apparent depression of the water table
due to the pressure of the overlying pavement. This apparent depression varies with soil
type and approximate correction factors used in calculating effective depth of water table
are given in table 3.1 below:
Table 3.1: Water Table Correction Factors for Soil Type PI
PI Correction Factor, SF0 0.00
10 0.30
15 0.55
20 0.80
25 1.10
30 1.40
35 1.60
>35 2.00 Source: TRL, 1993
To calculate the effective depth Dwhich is used to determine the applied suction in the
pressure plate extractor, the following equation is used:
. 2.7Where;
WT = Depth of water table below subgrade (at its highest expected seasonal
level),
SF = Correction factor from table 3.1,
t = Pavement thickness, with consistent units for WT, t, D
When equilibrium is attained in the pressure plate extractor, the sample is removed and its
moisture content measured. This moisture content is the value at which the CBR for
design should be estimated following standard soil tests to be discussed later in this
chapter.
Category (2);When the water table is not near the ground surface, the subgrade moisture
condition under an impermeable pavement will depend on the balance between the water
entering the subgrade through the shoulders and at the edges of the pavement during wet
weather and the moisture leaving the ground by evapotranspiration during dry periods.
Where the average annual rainfall is greater than 250 mm a year, the moisture condition
for design purposes can be taken as the optimum moisture content given by the British
Standard (Light) Compaction Test, 2.5 kg rammer method. When deciding on the depth of
-
8/12/2019 CE413 Highway Eng II[1]
35/132
Kyambogo University | P. O. Box 1, Kampala-UgandaCE413 Highway Engineering II, FEO- 2010. E-mail: francisokello@live.com. Mobile No.: (256) 712 806514, (256) 701 806514
27
27Testing Subgrade Soils
the water table in Category (1) or Category (2) subgrades, the possibility of the existence
of local perched water tables should be borne in mind and the effects of seasonal flooding
(where this occurs) should not be overlooked.
Category (3); In regions where the climate is dry throughout most of the year (annual
rainfall 250 mm or less), the moisture content of the subgrade under an impermeable
pavement will be low. For design purposes a value of 80 per cent of the optimum moisture
content obtained in the British Standard (Light) Compaction Test, 2.5 kg rammer method,should be used.
The methods of estimating the subgrade moisture content for design outlined above are
based on the assumption that the road pavement is virtually impermeable. Dense bitumen-
bound materials, stabilised soils with only very fine cracks, and crushed stone or gravel
with more than 15 per cent of material finer than the 75 micron sieve are themselves
impermeable (permeability less than 10-7 metres per second) and therefore subgrades
under road pavements incorporating these materials are unlikely to be influenced by water
infiltrating directly from above. However, if water, shed from the road surface or from
elsewhere, is able to penetrate to the subgrade for any reason, the subgrade may become
much wetter. In such cases the strength of subgrades with moisture conditions in Category
(1) and Category (2) should be assessed on the basis of saturated CBR samples asdescribed in the following section. Subgrades with moisture conditions in Category (3) are
unlikely to wet up significantly and the subgrade moisture content for design in such
situations can be taken as the optimum moisture content given by the British Standard
(Light) Compaction Test, 2.5 kg rammer method.
b) Determination of Subgrade StrengthHaving estimated the subgrade moisture content for design, it is then possible to determine
the appropriate design CBR value at the specified density. As a first step, it is necessary to
determine the compaction properties of the subgrade soil by carrying out standard
laboratory compaction tests. Samples of the subgrade soil at the design subgrade moisture
content can then be compacted in CBR moulds to the specified density and tested to
determine the CBR values. With cohesionless sands, the rammer method tends to
overestimate the optimum moisture content and underestimate the dry density achieved by
normal field equipment. The vibrating hammer method is more appropriate for these
materials. If samples of cohesive soils are compacted at moisture contents equal to or
greater than the optimum moisture content, they should be left sealed for 24 hours before
being tested so that excess pore water pressures induced during compaction are dissipated.
If saturated subgrade conditions are anticipated, the compacted samples for the CBR test
should be saturated by immersion in water for four days before being tested. In all other
cases when CBR is determined by direct measurement, the CBR samples should not be
immersed since this results in over design. In areas where existing roads have been built
on the same subgrade, direct measurements of the subgrade strengths can be made using adynamic cone penetrometer.
Except for direct measurements of CBR under existing pavements, in situ CBR
measurements of subgrade soils are not recommended because of
top related