imaging in the euv region -...

Post on 21-Sep-2020

2 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Imaging in the EUV region

Eberhard Spiller

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 2

Introduction to Imaging•

Applications–Astronomy–Microscopy–EUV Lithography–Direct Reconstruction

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 3

Imaging with light

Waves move by λ

in 10-15

to 10-19

sec

Wave trains are 10-14

to 10-18

sec long

Each wavelet contains less than 1 photon•

Eye responds in about 0.1 sec

Everything is washed out !•

How can we see?

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 4

Solutions

1) Use short observation time <10-15 sec need intensity, computer power, sample is destroyed

2) Generate standing waves that last need mirrors, lenses, coherence

3) Use simple objects (crystals): enhanced diffraction peaks low information content

simple reconstruction, resolve atoms

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 5

object Optic

Moving Diffraction pattern

Fast detector → Computer → Image

Standing waves→ Image

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 6

Material properties in the EUV

All materials absorb for λ<110 nm•

n = 1 -

δ, no lenses

No single surface mirrors, Rmax

< 1%

Multilayer designs that minimize absorption can enhance normal incidence reflectance to 70% in the 11 to 14 nm wavelength range

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 7

History of X-Ray Optics bias: high resolution imagesRöntgen, 1895 Shadow graphs, No lenses or mirrorsLaue, 1912 X-ray-diffraction Bragg, 1914 Atomic resolution for crystalsEwald, 1916 Dynamical TheoryCompton, 1923 Grazing incidence mirror, capillaries (1931)Kiessig, 1931 Thin film interference with x-raysDuMond&Youtz, 1935 X-ray peaks from multilayers, diffusion const.Bormann, 1941 Standing wave in crystal reduces absorptionKirkpatrik-Baez, 1948 Imaging with 2 cylinder-mirrors, zone platesWolter, 1952 Imaging with 2 conic sections

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 8

Recent HistoryMöllenstedt,1966 Zoneplates by electron-beamSchmahl, 1969 Zoneplates by holographySpiller, 1972 Multilayers for XUV near normal incidence

telescopes, microscopes, cameras, polarizersSpears, 1972 X-ray lithography (shadowgraphs)Walker, Golub, 1988 XUV telescopes for sun's corona SOHO, TRACEHawryluk, Kinoshita 1988 EUV projection lithographySnigirev 1996 Multi-lensesTinsley, 1998 Figure, finish of mirrors in 1 Å rangeEUVL LLC, 2001 EUVL cameras within diffraction limitFEL for x rays, 2009 Reconstruction in 3-D from diffraction patternsFuture Challenge: Phase contrast for medical x-rays

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 9

Multilayer Mirror Design

1971:Absorber in Node does not absorb100% mirror is possible despite absorption

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 10

O pti c

a b

c

d

f

e

dete

ctor

source

g

Euv/X-ray Imaging Systems

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 11

Normal Incidence Telescopes

1980: Contact Harvard Observatory (L. Golub)

1981: Arcsec resolution with 3”

mirror at 67Å

1986: First launch of Sounding Rockets

1991: Launch of YOHKOH observatory

1995: Launch of SOHO observatory

1998: Launch of TRACE

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 12

Multilayer telescope at IBM

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 13

Properties of IBM system

E-beam evaporation low energy minimizes diffusion

Ion polishing after deposition smoothes boundaries

In situ x-ray reflectivity for immediate quality control

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 14

White Sands Missile Range

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 15

White Sands Recovery

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 16

Trace, 10/10/98, λ=17.1nm

First good photo, 1989

Eclipse on July 11, 1991 gave estimate of scattering from multilayer mirror.

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 17

TRACE, 10/10/98, λ=17.1nm

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 18

Two mirror Schwarzschild for Microscopy and Lithography

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 19

(R. Hudyma)

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 20

Direct Reconstruction

Simple?

Needed:Coherent source (FEL)Many patterns for 3-DObject is destroyed at each exposureInject identical particles, different orientationComputer power and algorithms

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 21

First ExperimentsGraded Multilayer separatesdirect and scattered beamLight from exploding specimen does not reflect.Diffraction patterns of explodingspecimen are obtained and simplespecimen are reconstructed

Diffraction Patterns of Nano Particles injected into the beamhave been recorded and reconstructed

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 22

Challenge: Use phase contrast in medical x-rays

Promise: δ

is 104

times bigger than βEnhanced contrast, less radiation damage

Problem: Small deflection angle, except for very small featuresExperiments with synchrotron radiation and microscopic objects.Interferometry or large distance to detector

Multiple gratings suppress absorption contrast (Pfeiffer 2008)Probable path: Absorption contrast for large features, phase

contrast for small features?

E. Spiller, June 11, 2008 23

Figure 1. A portion of the solar corona seen in the Fe IX/X lines at λ=173Å on 7/29/98 from theTRACE spacecraft. Courtesy N AS A/TRACE.

top related