principle of assessment nkp3

Post on 01-Jun-2015

344 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

part 3

TRANSCRIPT

Principle of Assessment:PBA&WBA

อารยะ ไข่�มุกด์ 7 กมุภาพั�นธ์ 2556

รพั.นครพั�งค

The Learning DomainBenjamin Bloom (1956), identified three domains of educational activities:

•Cognitive: mental skills (Knowledge)

•Affective: growth in feelings or emotional areas (Attitude)

•Psychomotor: manual or physical skills (Skills)

K A S

“ ต้�องการทราบอะไร ให้�วั�ด์สิ่��งน��น”

Conventional

OSCE, observe

Observe

เรามุ�กประเมุ�น สิ่��งท"�ประเมุ�นง�าย

Types of assessment

•Formative- provides feedback about progress and offers guidance for

improvement

Summative- measures achievement and determines levels of competence

for progression

Miller’s Pyramid

Authentic Assessment

Workplace Based Assessment

AUTHENTICITY OF CLINICAL ASSESSMENT – MILLER’S PYRAMID

Miller (1990)

Knows

Shows how

Knows how

Does

Pro

fess

ion

al au

then

tici

tyPro

fess

ion

al au

then

tici

ty Behaviour

Cognition

Actual performance assessment (WPBA)

MILLER’S PYRAMID – 1990

Knows

Shows how

Knows how

Does

Procedural competence assessment (OSCE), simulation

(Clinical) context-based tests, MCQ, essays

Factual tests, MCQ, essays

WBA

WHAT&HOW DO WE ASSESS?

Clinical knowledge and skills

Practical skills

Interpersonal skills and judgement

Professional behaviours

Case-based discussion

(CBD)

Direct observation of

procedures (DOPs)

Direct observations of non-clinical

skills (DONCS)

360º appraisal

(360)

Workplace assessment – judgement based on….

• Single encounter• Actually observed performance • Case specific • Routine performance• Observation over a period on different

occasions on different problems • Reduces problems with case specificity

Workplace assessment – nature of judgement

• Did it happen? มุ"ห้ร#อไมุ�มุ"• Checklist approach • Objective• Structured• Consistent• But not very discriminatory

Workplace assessment – nature of judgement

• Was the trainee any good? ด์"ห้ร#อไมุ�ด์"• Global rating• More valid

Workplace assessment – MiniCEX

• Faculty member observes a trainee interacting with a patient in a clinical setting

• 15 minutes (+5 minutes for feedback) • Interviewing skills, physical exam,

professionalism, communication skills• Formative feedback

Workplace assessment – CbD

• Case based discussion • Trainee selects case studies, assessor

chooses one of these • Assessor should ask why this selection• Assesses quality of … diagnosis, assessment,

management, record-keeping• 15 minutes (5 minutes for feedback)

Workplace assessment – DOPS

• Direct observation of procedural skills• Real patients• 15 minutes (+ 5 minutes feedback) • Trainees select from an approved list of

procedures• Indications, communication, technique,

analgesia, asepsis

Workplace assessment – DOPS

• 6 times in the year • Valid • Global rating scales

Workplace assessment – portfolios

• Different types of information• Summary of educational experiences• Reviewed by an assessor • Reflection• Action plan• Purpose must be clear (e.g. for summative

use)• Need be specific about what portfolio should

contain

Workplace assessment – checklists vs global ratings?

• Scores are broadly correlated

• Checklists – objective, reliable, lower level of expertise

• Global ratings – subjective, more valid

• Only experts can use global ratings• Anyone can be trained to use a checklist

Validity and Reliability•Validity: “Has the test effectively measured what it

was intended to measure?”

•Reliability: “reproducibility of assessment data or scores, over time or occasions”

From novice to expert

Take Home Messages- วั�ด์สิ่��งท"�ต้�องการวั�ด์- อย�าลื#มุใช้�การวั�ด์ห้ลืายๆ อย�าง- Formative as well as Summative assessment

Thank You

top related