wp7: system integration and task 7.1 – definition of evaluation methodology

WP7: Piloting the SLOPE demonstrator

Kick-off Meeting 8-9/jan/2014

Work package description

Kühmaier Ma, Stampfer Ka, Stefke Bb

a Institute of Forest Engineeringb Department of Chemistry

University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna

Objectives

Demonstration of supply chains, implemented models and IT-systems

Field demonstrations

Trade fairs

Stakeholder involvement

Training on the job

2

Tasks

T.7.1 Definition of evaluation methodology BOKU

T.7.2 Preparation of demonstrators ITENE

T.7.3 Trials and validation cycle BOKU

T.7.4 Training on the job CNR

3

Timeline

4

2014 2015 2016

J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D

T.7.1 D

T.7.2 D

T.7.3 M D M M

T.7.4

Duration: 24 months, workload: 83.5 months

Task leader: BOKU, participants: all

+5D

WP7: Piloting the SLOPE demonstrator

Kick-off Meeting 8-9/jan/2014

Task 7.1 – Definition of evaluation

methodology

Kühmaier M, Stampfer KInstitute of Forest Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna

Activities and partners

Development of principles and guidelines for the evaluation of two mountainous forest supply chains (Whole tree, Cut-to-length) BOKU, CNR

Harvesting, chipping, transport, storage, quality management BOKU, CNR, KESLA, GRE, ITENE

Process flow diagrams BOKU

Work studies and performance rating BOKU, CNR, MHG

Multicriteria evaluation BOKU

6

Timeline and participants

Duration: 3 months, workload: 10.5 months

Task leader: BOKU (4.5)

Participants: CNR (1), KESLA (1.5), MHG (2), GREIFENBERG (0.5), ITENE (1)

7

2014 2015 2016

J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D

Start: January 2015 End: March 2015

D7.01 Protocol for the definition of evaluation methodology BOKU

Dependencies between activities

8

T.7.1

WP2 Forest information collection

T.7.2 Preparation of demonstrators

WP3 Harvesting

systems

WP4 Quality control

T.7.3 Trials andvalidation cycle

Risks

Focusing on a limited number of supply chain processes (bottlenecks)

Choosing a comprehensible, scientific but not to complicated evaluation methodology

Combining different evaluation approaches

Degree of automation

Manual vs automatic recording

9

Guidelines for work studies

10

Magagnotti & Spinelli (2012)

Process flow diagram

11

K. Stampfer (2013)

PlantForest Road SideForest Terminal(at least built for 10 years

dedicated only for storing material)

Material Flow

Name of Chain: Mountain forests and coppice

TransportWood chips

Pro

ce

ssin

g o

f M

ate

ria

l

Fuel Wood

Felling

Yarding Processing

Round Wood

Fuel Wood

Comminution

Sorting

Residues

Stem

Stump

STAND

Definition of work cycles

12

T. Palander (2013)

Process data models

13

Kariniemi and Vartiamäki (2010)

Multicriteria evaluation

14

Ecology

Impacts on Soil

Bearing pressure in kPa

Global Warming Potential

Fuel consumption in kg CO2

equivalent

Stand damage

Damage on remaining stand in %

Economy

Value added

Value added in €

Relocation time

Aggregation of harvesting areas in %

Social

Employment

Demand in Work Force in h

Working safety

Injury quota in n/1 Mio. m3

M. Kühmaier (2010)

Chain saw – hand

Chain saw – forwarder

Chain saw – cable forwarder

Chain saw – cable yarder

Harvester – forwarder

Tracked harvester – cable yarder

Tracked harvester – cable forwarder

Chain saw – skidder

Chain saw - helicopter - processor

Chain saw - cable yarder - processor

M. Kühmaier (2010)

Multicriteria evaluation