wp7: system integration and task 7.1 – definition of evaluation methodology
TRANSCRIPT
WP7: Piloting the SLOPE demonstrator
Kick-off Meeting 8-9/jan/2014
Work package description
Kühmaier Ma, Stampfer Ka, Stefke Bb
a Institute of Forest Engineeringb Department of Chemistry
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
Objectives
Demonstration of supply chains, implemented models and IT-systems
Field demonstrations
Trade fairs
Stakeholder involvement
Training on the job
2
Tasks
T.7.1 Definition of evaluation methodology BOKU
T.7.2 Preparation of demonstrators ITENE
T.7.3 Trials and validation cycle BOKU
T.7.4 Training on the job CNR
3
Timeline
4
2014 2015 2016
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D
T.7.1 D
T.7.2 D
T.7.3 M D M M
T.7.4
Duration: 24 months, workload: 83.5 months
Task leader: BOKU, participants: all
+5D
WP7: Piloting the SLOPE demonstrator
Kick-off Meeting 8-9/jan/2014
Task 7.1 – Definition of evaluation
methodology
Kühmaier M, Stampfer KInstitute of Forest Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
Activities and partners
Development of principles and guidelines for the evaluation of two mountainous forest supply chains (Whole tree, Cut-to-length) BOKU, CNR
Harvesting, chipping, transport, storage, quality management BOKU, CNR, KESLA, GRE, ITENE
Process flow diagrams BOKU
Work studies and performance rating BOKU, CNR, MHG
Multicriteria evaluation BOKU
6
Timeline and participants
Duration: 3 months, workload: 10.5 months
Task leader: BOKU (4.5)
Participants: CNR (1), KESLA (1.5), MHG (2), GREIFENBERG (0.5), ITENE (1)
7
2014 2015 2016
J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D
Start: January 2015 End: March 2015
D7.01 Protocol for the definition of evaluation methodology BOKU
Dependencies between activities
8
T.7.1
WP2 Forest information collection
T.7.2 Preparation of demonstrators
WP3 Harvesting
systems
WP4 Quality control
T.7.3 Trials andvalidation cycle
Risks
Focusing on a limited number of supply chain processes (bottlenecks)
Choosing a comprehensible, scientific but not to complicated evaluation methodology
Combining different evaluation approaches
Degree of automation
Manual vs automatic recording
9
Guidelines for work studies
10
Magagnotti & Spinelli (2012)
Process flow diagram
11
K. Stampfer (2013)
PlantForest Road SideForest Terminal(at least built for 10 years
dedicated only for storing material)
Material Flow
Name of Chain: Mountain forests and coppice
TransportWood chips
Pro
ce
ssin
g o
f M
ate
ria
l
Fuel Wood
Felling
Yarding Processing
Round Wood
Fuel Wood
Comminution
Sorting
Residues
Stem
Stump
STAND
Definition of work cycles
12
T. Palander (2013)
Process data models
13
Kariniemi and Vartiamäki (2010)
Multicriteria evaluation
14
Ecology
Impacts on Soil
Bearing pressure in kPa
Global Warming Potential
Fuel consumption in kg CO2
equivalent
Stand damage
Damage on remaining stand in %
Economy
Value added
Value added in €
Relocation time
Aggregation of harvesting areas in %
Social
Employment
Demand in Work Force in h
Working safety
Injury quota in n/1 Mio. m3
M. Kühmaier (2010)
Chain saw – hand
Chain saw – forwarder
Chain saw – cable forwarder
Chain saw – cable yarder
Harvester – forwarder
Tracked harvester – cable yarder
Tracked harvester – cable forwarder
Chain saw – skidder
Chain saw - helicopter - processor
Chain saw - cable yarder - processor
M. Kühmaier (2010)
Multicriteria evaluation