bファクトリー実験の最新結果 -...
TRANSCRIPT
K+π +
π −e−
π −π +
Missing
飯嶋 徹
名古屋大学
2006年8月3日“素粒子物理学の進展2006”
Bファクトリー実験の最新結果&
今後の展望
2
The KEKB Collider
e+ source
Ares RF cavity
Belle detectorSCC RF(HER)
ARES(LER)
e- (8.0GeV) × e+ (3.5GeV)⇒Υ(4S) →BB⇒Lorentz boost: βγ = 0.425
Finite crossing angle- 11mrad ×2
Operation since 1999.
Peak luminosity1.65 x 1034 cm-2s-1 !
3
Belle測定器
4
Belle Collaboration
13 countries, 57 institutes, ~400 collaborators
IHEP, ViennaITEPKanagawa U.KEKKorea U.Krakow Inst. of Nucl. Phys.Kyoto U. Kyungpook Nat’l U. EPF Lausanne Jozef Stefan Inst. / U. of Ljubljana / U. of MariborU. of Melbourne
Aomori U.BINPChiba U.Chonnam Nat’l U.U. of CincinnatiEwha Womans U.Frankfurt U.Gyeongsang Nat’l U.U. of HawaiiHiroshima Tech.IHEP, BeijingIHEP, Moscow
Nagoya U.Nara Women’s U.National Central U.Nat’l Kaoshiung Normal U.National Taiwan U.National United U.Nihon Dental CollegeNiigata U.Osaka U.Osaka City U.Panjab U.Peking U.U. of PittsburghPrinceton U.RikenSaga U.USTC
Seoul National U.Shinshu U.Sungkyunkwan U.U. of SydneyTata InstituteToho U.Tohoku U.Tohuku Gakuin U.U. of TokyoTokyo Inst. of Tech.Tokyo Metropolitan U.Tokyo U. of Agri. and Tech.Toyama Nat’l CollegeU. of TsukubaUtkal U.VPIYonsei U.
5
Integrated Luminosity
PEP-IIfor BaBar
As of July 24, 2006
KEKBfor Belle
KEKB + PEP-II
KEKB/Belle: 630.0 fb-1
PEP-II/BaBar: 378.8 fb-1
Total = 1000fb-1
109 BB pairs !
6
Our Motivation
sin2φ1 history(1998-2005)
Q. What is the main source ofCP violation ?
A. Kobayashi-Maskawa phaseIS the dominant source !
Paradigm shift !
Q. Are there deviations from theCKM picture ? (e.g. newCP-violating phases)
7
Talk OutlineOver-constrain the unitarity triangle.– Precise measurement of φ1, φ2, φ3, Vcb, Vub, Vtd.
Compare sin2φ1 between tree and penguin diagrams.
Search for new physics effects in – Rare B decays
– LFV τ decays Belle @ ICHEP06#abstracts#talks
+ Future
8
Over-constraining the UT
9
Kobayashi-Maskawa (1973)cos sin'sin cos'
C C
C C
d ds s
θ θθ θ
⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟−⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠
GIM
Flavor eigenstate
Mass eigenstate
CKM
'''
ud us ub
cd cs cb
td ts tb
V V Vd ds V V V sb bV V V
⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟= ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠
KM W-
d(s,b)uV*ud(s,b)
u c td s b
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
3X3 unitarity triangle has 3 rotational angles and one comlex phase. CPV
CP in KL π+π-
10
The Unitarity Triangleud us ub
cd cs cb
td ts tb
V V VV V VV V V
⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟ =⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
( )
2 3
2 2 4
3 2
1 ( )2
1 2(1 ) 1
A i
A
A i A
λ λ λ ρ η
λλ λ λ
λ ρ η λ
⎛ ⎞− −⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟− − + Ο⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟− − −⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ WolfensteinKM
* * * 0ud ub cd cb td tbV V V V V V+ + =
2φ
3φ 1φρ
η
*
*tb
cb
td
cd
VV VV
*
*ubud
cd cb
VV V
V
1
/ SB J K
unitarity
ψ→
,B ππ ρπ→
B DK→
B-B mixinguB X ν→
2
( ) 1 ( )2
λρ η ρ η⎛ ⎞
= −⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
11
The Golden Decay 0 / SB J Kψ→
bcs
W + /J Ψ
d d SK0B
c
0 / SB J Kψ→• Tree
0Bb
d
0B
t
t
W + W −
b c
sW +
/J Ψ
d dSK
c
0 0 / SB B J Kψ→ →• Box + Tree
12
CP Violation in B Decays
• (The initial) B0 and B0 exhibits different quantum interference.
0B / SJ Kψie φ
0B
0B
Different !
0Bie φ−
0B
0B
/ SJ Kψ
B at t=0CP mirrorB at t=0
13
Method to study CPV
e-(8.0GeV) e+(3.5GeV)
B0
B0B0
Produce B and B by e-e+ collision
-
K-
B flavor tagging
J/ψ
KS
-
+ Detect B J/ψ Ks
t=0 Measure time-dependence
Asymmetric collision w/ high luminosityDetector w/ good vertex & particle id. capability
14
ttCPCPV in BV in B00 decaysdecays
Mixing-induced CPV Direct CPV
e.g. for J/ψ KsS = −ξCPsin2φ1 = +sin2φ1A = 0to a good approximation(ξCP : CP eigenvalue)
e.g. for J/ψ KsS = −ξCPsin2φ1 = +sin2φ1A = 0to a good approximation(ξCP : CP eigenvalue)
(A = −C a la BaBar)
15
BB00 J/J/ψψ KK00 : combined result: combined result
sin2φ1= 0.642 ±0.031 (stat) ±0.017 (syst)A = 0.018 ±0.021 (stat) ±0.014 (syst)
previous measurementsin2φ1= 0.652 ± 0.044
(386 M BB pairs)
B0 tag_B
0 tag
532 M BB pairs_ _
Belle preliminary BELLE-CONF-0647BELLE-CONF-0647
O. TajimaO. Tajima
16
2006: BaBar + Belle2006: BaBar + Belle
Consistency with Vub, φ3/γ R. Kowalewski (next speaker)
Belle 2006: B0→π+π- decay (CP asymmetry)
0
100
200
300
q = +1q = −1
(a)
No
. o
f π
+π
- ev
en
ts
-1
0
1
-5 0 5∆t (ps)
π+π
- asym
metr
y
(b)
04.010.061.005.008.055.0
±±−=±±+=
ππ
ππ
SA
first error: stat., second: syst.
17background subtracted
π+π-yields
π+π-asymmetry
Large Direct CP violation (5.5σ)
Large mixing-induced CP violation (5.6σ)
confidence level contour
H. IshinoH. Ishino
BELLE-CONF-0649BELLE-CONF-0649_
532M BB1464±65 signal events
18
-0.4-0.2
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.4
0 100 200 300 400 500
BelleBaBar
Aππ
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
0 100 200 300 400 500BB
– (×106)
Sππ
History of B0→π+π- decay
(C = −A)
2.3σ diff. btw. Belle and BaBar
ICHEP2006: BaBar(ICHEP2006: BaBar(ππππ//ρπρπ//ρρρρ) + Belle() + Belle(ππππ//ρρρρ))
α/φ2 = [93 ]°+11− 9 consistent with a global fit w/o α/φ2
αGlobal Fit = [ 98 ] º+5-19
19
20
Status of CKM fit 2006
No inconsistency found so far...
21
Is this enough ?
No,A little tension between |Vub| and φ1.Need improvement of φ3– We should first determine the apex by tree-level
processes; |Vub| + φ3
– Then compare it to others;• Bd mixing and CPV• Bs mixing and CPV• εK and B(K πνν)
|Vub|e-iφ3 |Vtd|eiφ1
|Vcb|
22
Determination of |Vub|
Inclusive B Xu l ν Exclusive B π l ν
Like to see consistency with better precision.
23
CP Violation in b s Penguin
24
CPV in b s Penguin Processes• Heavy particles may be mediated in the quantum loop.
• In SM, CPV(B0 φKs) = CPV(B0 J/ψKs)
• If a new particle carries a quantum new phaseCPV(B0 φKs) ≠CPV(B0 J/ψKs)
b s
s
sg
φNP ?
d d SK
φ0B
bc
sW
/J Ψ
d d SK0B
c
CP dN1 PA (t) sin2( + ) sin(∆ t)mφφ= ×
25
Belle 2006: Belle 2006: BB00 φφKK0 0 signalsignal
B0 mass
B0 momentum
_532M BB
(bkg subtracted)
φ K+K−, KS π+π−
φ K+K−, KS π0π0
φ KSKL, KS π+π−
114 ± 17 φKL signal114 ± 17 φKL signal
307 ± 21 φKS signal307 ± 21 φKS signal
Three modes
New !
BELLE-CONF-0647BELLE-CONF-0647
Belle 2006: tBelle 2006: tCPCPV in V in BB00 φφKK00
“sin2φ1” = +0.50 ± 0.21(stat) ± 0.05(syst)A = +0.07 ± 0.15(stat) ± 0.06(syst)
“sin2φ1” = +0.50 ± 0.21(stat) ± 0.05(syst)A = +0.07 ± 0.15(stat) ± 0.06(syst)
_532M BB
∆t distribution and asymmetry
φKS and φKL combinedbackground subtractedgood tags∆t –∆t for φKL 26
Consistent with the SM (~1σ lower)Consistent with Belle 2005
(Belle2005: “sin2φ1” = +0.44±0.27±0.05)
The most precise measurement now
Consistent with the SM (~1σ lower)Consistent with Belle 2005
(Belle2005: “sin2φ1” = +0.44±0.27±0.05)
The most precise measurement now
unbinned fitSM
BELLE-CONF-0647BELLE-CONF-0647
27
Belle 2006: Belle 2006: BB00 ηη''KK0 0 signalsignal_
532M BB
1421 ± 46 η'KS signal1421 ± 46 η'KS signal
451 ± 41 η'KL signal451 ± 41 η'KL signal
B0 momentumB0 mass (bkg subtracted)
Belle 2006: tBelle 2006: tCPCPV in V in BB00 ηη''KK00
“sin2φ1” = +0.64 ± 0.10(stat) ± 0.04(syst)A = +0.01 ± 0.07(stat) ± 0.05(syst)
“sin2φ1” = +0.64 ± 0.10(stat) ± 0.04(syst)A = +0.01 ± 0.07(stat) ± 0.05(syst)
_532M BB
∆t distribution and asymmetry
First observation of tCPV (5.6σ) in a single b s mode Consistent with the SMConsistent with Belle 2005
(Belle 2005: “sin2φ1” = +0.62±0.12±0.04)
First observation of tCPV (5.6σ) in a single b s mode Consistent with the SMConsistent with Belle 2005
(Belle 2005: “sin2φ1” = +0.62±0.12±0.04)
η''KS and η''KL combinedbackground subtractedgood tags∆t –∆t for η''KL BELLE-CONF-0647BELLE-CONF-0647
28
29
Belle 2006: tBelle 2006: tCPCPV in V in BB00 KKSSKKSSKKSS
“sin2φ1” = +0.30 ± 0.32(stat) ± 0.09(syst)A = +0.31 ± 0.20(stat) ± 0.09(syst)
“sin2φ1” = +0.30 ± 0.32(stat) ± 0.09(syst)A = +0.31 ± 0.20(stat) ± 0.09(syst)
185 ± 17 KSKSKS signal185 ± 17 KSKSKS signal
B0 mass
_532M BB
∆t distribution and asymmetry
background subtracted
good tags
BELLE-CONF-0647BELLE-CONF-0647
30
Status at Summer 2005
31
2006: 2006: φφ11 with with bb ss PenguinsPenguinsSmaller than b ccs in all of 9 modesSmaller than b ccs in all of 9 modes
Theory tends to predictpositive shifts(originating from phasein Vts)
Naïve average of all b s modessin2βeff = 0.52 ± 0.052.6 σ deviation betweenpenguin and tree(b s) (b c)
Naïve average of all b s modessin2βeff = 0.52 ± 0.052.6 σ deviation betweenpenguin and tree(b s) (b c)
More statistics crucial for mode-by-mode studies
32
Search for Decays with Missing Energy (Neutrinos)
33
Belle Physics Milestone
Observation of B K l+ l-
Large CP Violation in B
Observation of Large CPV and evidence of direct CPV in B π+π-
Beginning of B->φK0 saga
Direct CPV in B0 K+π−
FB asymmetry in B K* l+l-
Evidence of B τν
Observation of b dγ
# of publications= 172 as of today.
34
B τ ν Motivation
Proceed via W annihilation in the SM.
SM Branching fraction is given by
b
u W+τ +
ν
fB determination
tan cotb um mβ β+
b
u H+/W+
tanmτ β
τ +
Sensitive to the charged Higgs
35
Full Reconstruction MethodFully reconstruct one of the B’s to tag– B production– B flavor/charge– B momentum
Υ(4S)
e−(8GeV) e+(3.5GeV)
B
Bπ
full (0.1~0.3%)reconstructionB Dπ etc.
Decays of interestsB Xu l ν,B K ν νB Dτν, τν
Single B meson beam in offline !
Powerful tools for B decays w/ neutrinos
36
Signal Selection (2)Extra neutral energy in calorimeter EECL– Most powerful variable for separating signal and background– Total calorimeter energy from the neutral clusters which are not
associated with the tag B
Minimum energy thresholdBarrel : 50 MeVFor(Back)ward endcap : 100(150) MeV
Zero or small value of EECL arising only from beam background
Higher EECL due to additional neutral clusters
MC includes overlay of random trigger data to reproduce beam backgrounds.
37
Open the box !The final results are deduced by unbinned likelihood fit to the obtained EECL distributions.
Signal shape : Gauss + exponentialBackground shape : second-order polynomial
+ Gauss (peaking component)
Signal +
background
Background
B τν
Signal
Observe 17.2 events. Significance decreased to 3.5 σ
after including systematics
+5.3- 4.7
Σ : Statistical Significance
38
B τν Candidate Event
20 cm
BELLE
K+π +
π −e−
π −π +
Missing
BB++ DD0 0 ππ++
KK++ ππ-- ππ++ ππ--
BB-- τ τ -- νν
ee--νννν
39
Correction to the FPCP06 result
Error in the efficiency calculation.– Due to a coding error, the efficiency quoted in the 1st Belle
preliminary result was incorrect.
Treatment of the peaking background component.– Peaking component is subtracted for the central value.– Re-evaluate its systematic uncertainty.
The data plots and event sample are unchanged. However, fB and the branching fraction must be changed.
418.034.016.028.0 1006.1)(BF −++
−−++ ×=→ τντBPrevious
value
New value 439.056.046.049.0 10)79.1()(BF −++
−−++ ×=→ τντB (Preliminary)
40
fB Extraction
Product of B meson decay constant fB and CKM matrix element |Vub|
Using |Vub| = (4.39 ± 0.33)×10-3 from HFAG
1.6 1.1 41.4 1.3(10.1 ) 10B ubf V GeV+ + −
− −× = ×
36 3031 34229Bf M eV+ +
− −=14% = 12%(exp.) + 8%(Vub)15%
fB = 216 ± 22 MeV[HPQCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 212001 (2005) ]
41
Constraints on Charged Higgs
2σrH
A
A
B
tan / HmβB
42
Future ProspectBr(B τ ν) measurement:Further accumulation of luminosity help to reduce both statistical and systematic errors.– Some of the major systematic
errors come from limited statistics of the control sample.
|Vub| measurement:< 5% in future is an realistic goal.
fB from theory~10% now 5% ?
∆|Vub|/|Vub| = 5.8%∆fB/fB = 5%
L=5ab-1
Constraint also comes from b s γ.
43
Search for H- by B Dτν
cb
τ +H+/W+
ντ
( )tan cotb c um mβ β+
tanmτ β
( )( )
B D vBB D v
τ
µ
τµ
Γ →=
Γ →
Band width from form-factor uncertainty
Expected ∆Br ~8% @ L=5ab-1
∆(Fo
rm-fa
ctor)
~5%
∆(Form-fa
ctor) ~
15%
βtan 20 40 60
)2 M
ass
(GeV
/c±
H
100
200
300
400
500
Tevatron Run I Excluded (95% C.L.)
LEP Excluded (95% C.L.)
)-1
(140 fbντ →
Belle B
ντ→Hb, H→ t-1CMS 100fb
-1
5ab
ντ D
→B
-1 5
0ab
ντ D
→B
ντ
→tH
, H→
gb
-1
CM
S 10
0fb
βtan 20 40 60
)2 M
ass
(GeV
/c±
H
100
200
300
400
500
Constraint from B Xs γ
44
B K(*) ν ν (b s w/ two ν’s)Sensitive new physics.Theoretically very clean.Experimentally very challenging.Signature: B K(*) + nothing.Nothing may be light dark matter(see papers by Pespelov et al.).
DAMA NaI 3σ Region
CDMS 04
CDMS 05 Direct dark matter search cannot see M<10GeV region.
45
Search for K* ν ν (Belle 2006)
532M BB
Blind analysis
BELLE-CONF-0627
Sideband = 19
MC expectation = 18.7±3.3
(1.7σ stat. significance)
Yield = 4.7 +3.1-2.6
Extra Calorimeter Energy (GeV)
0 *0 4( ) 3.4 10B B K νν −→ < × (at 90% C.L)
46
Lepton Flavor ViolationQuarks have flavor mixing.
Neutrino mixing has been found.What about charged leptons ?
e µ τ
eν µν τν
? ?
(Original figure by Dr. Kuno / Osaka Univ.)
B factory is also a tau factory
47
τ lγ/3l,lητ lγ
SUSY + SeasawLarge LFV Br(τ µγ)=O(10-7~9)
( )2
32
426
2( a10 1) t nL
L
SUSY
B TeVm
mr
mτ µγ β−
⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎛ ⎞
⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
⎟→ ×⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
∼
τ 3l,lη• Neutral Higgs mediated decay.• Important when MSUSY >> EW scale.
( ) 4627 32
2
tan 10060
( 3 )
4 10A
L
L
B
Gm
r
m
meVβ
τ µ
−
→ =
⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟× ×⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
( ) : ( 3 ) : ( )5 :1: 0.5
Br Br Brτ µη τ µ τ µγ→ → →=
τ ( )eµ
γ
τ0χ
( )eµ2
23(13)l(m )
τ µ
( )sµ
( )sµ
h
48
Search for τ µγ (Belle 2006)535fb-1
Tighter requirements to reduce BG.– Background x 0.28– Efficiency: 11% 6.7%– Signal region:
5σ box 2σ ellipseResults from a ML fit.– Ns = -3.9– Nb = 13.9
no signal events are found.
distribution in 2σ bandproj
ectio
n
signaldata
blinded region
preliminary
Br(τ µγ) < 4.5 x 10-8
cf.) Previous Belle;Br < 3.1 x 10-7 @ 86fb-1
49
New τ µη result from Belle401fb-1
Counting methodin 90% ellipse on Mmh-DE planeη γγ mode– eff: 6.4%– Nobserved=0 0.4 expected bkg.
η π+π-π0 mode– eff: 6.8%– Nobserved=0 0.24 expected bkg.
Upper limit w/ 2 modes
Br(τ µη)<6.5x10-890% ellipse:a region which contains 90%ofsignal MC events
preliminary
signaldata
cf.) Previous Belle;Br < 1.5 x 10-7 @ 154fb-1
50
Impact of τ µγ
MSSM + seesaw42
6
TeV160tan100.3)(
−− ⎟
⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛×⎟
⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛××=→ SUSYMBr βµγτ
tanβ
0
10080604020
0 1 2 3 4
Belle result
BaBar result
MSUSY (TeV/c2)
51
Impact of τ µη
427
( )
tan8.4 1060 100GeV
A
Br
M
τ µη
β −−
→
⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= × × ×⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
Higgs mediated model predictsD0
CDF
Belle(90%CL)
BaBar(90%CL)
CDF• φ ττ search/310pb-1
D0• φ ττ search/325pb-1
• φ bb search/260pb-1
Belle(95%CL)
Our result has good sensitivity in comparison with Tevatron results.
52
Summary of LFV SearchCompiled by Hayasaka (Nagoya)
mode x10-7 mode x10-7
τ µγ Belle 0.45 τ lll 1.1−3.5
τ eγ BaBar 1.1 τ− µ+e−e− BaBar 1.1
τ µη Belle 0.65 τ− µ−e−e+ Belle 1.9
τ eη Belle 0.92 τ lhh BaBar 0.7−4.8
τ µη' Belle 1.3 τ− µ+π−π− BaBar 0.7
τ eη' Belle 1.6 τ lV0 Belle 2.0−7.7
τ µπ0 Belle 1.2 τ µρ0 Belle 2.0
τ eπ0 Belle 0.80 τ− Λπ− BaBar 0.59
τ µKs Belle 0.52 τ− Λπ− BaBar 0.58
τ eKs Belle 0.60 τ− ΛΚ− BaBar 0.72
τ− ΛΚ− BaBar 1.5The search region eneters into O(10-8).The search region eneters into O(10-8).
53
SummaryThe B factories both at KEK and SLAC have been so successful. The total luminosity exceeds 1ab-1 now. We are enjoying analyses.
CKM: no inconsistency found so far.
b s penguin: 2.6 σ deviation. Lower than b ccs for all 9 modes.
Missing energy decay: Belle has found the 1st evidence of B τ ν. It provides information about the charged Higgs.
LFV τ decays: search region eneters into O(10-8).
54
Cont’d
We still need a lot more luminosity.
For coming years (2007~8):– Installation of Crab cavity.– Improvement in analyses.– Cooperation with theorists.
Beyond this, we need a Super-B.The target luminosity of Super-KEKB = 8x 1035
cm-2s-1.
+ Υ(5S) run
55
56
Crab Cavity
57
58
59
Is the CKM Triangle Closed?50 ab-1
Yes! No!
b
d
d
b
t
t
W W0B 0B ?Something new in
60
Sensitivity to new CP phases
|ASU
SY/A
SM|2
θnew physics
Discovery region with 50 ab-1Estimated error in the measurement of time dependent CP violation
61
LFV Search at Super-B
τ ( )eµ
γ
τ0χ
( )eµ2
23(13)l(m )
τ µ
( )sµ
( )sµ
h
τ 3l, lη
τ lγ
τ3l
τl K
s
τB
γ/π
Search region enters into O(10-8 10-9)
10-9
10-8
10-7
10-6
10-5
µ− γe− γ
µ− π0
e− π0
µ− ηe− η
µ− η′e− η′
e− e+ e−
e− µ+ µ−
e+ µ− µ−
µ− e+ e−
µ+ e− e−
µ− µ+ µ−
e− π+ π−
e+ π− π−
µ− π+ π−
µ+ π− π−
e− π+ K−
e− π− K+
e+ π− K−
e− K+ K
−
e+ K− K
−
µ− π+ K−
µ− π− K+
µ+ π− K−
µ− K+ K
−
µ+ K− K
−
e− ρ0
e− KS
e− K*
e− K–*
e− φµ− ρ0
µ− KS
µ− K*
µ− K–*
µ− φ p–γ
p–π0
Λπ−
Λπ−
PDG2005 Belle BaBar
SuperKEKB10ab-1
τlγ
τlπ
/η(‘)
62
Interplay between B and τ
J.Hisano @ Tau04Workshop, Nara,Nov, 2004.J.Hisano, Y.ShimizuPLB565(2003)183.
63
CP Asymmetries in B φ Ks and b sγ
Direct asymmetry in b −> s γ
CP asymmetry in B −>φ Ks
CP asymmetry in B −> K*γ
64
B/τ Physics in the LHC Era• LHC likely/hopefully finds New Physics (NP) at
~TeV.
• If so, NP effects are likely to be seen at loops in B and τ decays.
• Such data will be useful to– Study NP flavor structure (mixing & CPV).– Identify NP scenario.
• If not, B and τ decays will be one of the best ways to find NP.
65