biodiesel supercritico

Upload: davinci

Post on 14-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Biodiesel Supercritico

    1/6

    Kinetics of transesterication in rapeseed oil to biodiesel fuel as treated insupercritical methanol

    D. Kusdiana, S. Saka*

    Department of Socio-Environmental Energy Science, Graduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University, Yoshida Honmachi, Sakyo-ku,

    Kyoto 606-8501, Japan

    Received 28 December 1999; accepted 3 August 2000

    Abstract

    A kinetic study in free catalyst transesterication of rapeseed oil was made in subcritical and supercritical methanol under differentreaction conditions of temperatures and reaction times. Runs were made in a bath-type reaction vessel ranging from 2008C in subcritical

    temperature to 5008C at supercritical state with different molar ratios of methanol to rapeseed oil to determine rate constants by employing a

    simple method. As a result, the conversion rate of rapeseed oil to its methyl esters was found to increase dramatically in the supercritical state,

    and reaction temperature of 3508C was considered as the best condition, with the molar ratio of methanol in rapeseed oil being 42. q 2001

    Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Kinetics of transesterication; Supercritical methanol; Methyl esters; Biodiesel fuel

    1. Introduction

    Transesterication of vegetable oils with simple alcoholhas long been a preferred method for producing biodiesel

    fuel [13]. Generally speaking, there are two methods of

    transesterication reaction. One is the method using a cata-

    lyst and the other is without the help of a catalyst. The

    former method has a long story of development and now

    biodiesel fuel produced by this method is in the market in

    some countries such as North America, Japan and some

    west European countries.

    However, there are at least two problems associated with

    this process; the process is relatively time consuming and

    purication of the product for catalyst and saponied

    products are necessary. The rst problem due to the two

    phase nature of vegetable oil/methanol mixture requiresvigorous stirring to proceed in the transesterication reac-

    tion. To solve this problem, Boocock et al. reported that the

    use of a simple ether such as tetrahydrofuran can make this

    two phase nature into one phase of its mixture and that

    methyl esters can be produced in less than 15 min depending

    on the catalyst concentration [4]. Yet, the catalyst problem

    cannot be solved for purication. Therefore, this conven-

    tional process still requires a high production cost and

    energy. The overall process, thus, includes transesterica-

    tion reaction, recovery of unreacted methanol, purication

    of methyl esters from catalyst and separation of glycerin as aco-product from saponied products.

    The latter method involves uncatalyzed transesterica-

    tion of vegetable oil in supercritical methanol as recently

    reported by Saka and Kusdiana [5]. The supercritical state of

    methanol is believed to solve the two phase nature of oil/

    methanol mixture to form a single phase due to a decrease in

    dielectric constant of methanol in supercritical state [6]. As

    a result, the reaction was found to be complete in a very

    short time within 24 min, as described in their previous

    work [5]. In addition, because of non-catalytic process, the

    purication of products after transesterication reaction is

    much simpler and environmentally friendly, compared with

    the conventional commercial method in which all thecatalyst and saponied products have to be removed for

    biodiesel fuel.

    Some researchers have reported kinetics for both acid-

    and alkali-catalyzed transesterication reactions. Dufek

    and coworkers studied the acid-catalyzed esterication

    and transesterication of 9(10)-carboxystearic acid and its

    mono- and di-methyl esters [7]. Freedman et al. reported

    transesterication reaction of soybean oil and other vegeta-

    ble oils with alcohols [8], and examined in their study were

    the effects of the type of alcohol, molar ratio, type and

    amount of catalyst and reaction temperature on rate

    Fuel 80 (2001) 693698

    0016-2361/01/$ - see front matter q 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

    PII: S0016-2361(00) 00140-X

    www.elsevier.com/locate/fuel

    * Corresponding author. Tel./fax:181-75-753-4738.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Saka).

  • 7/30/2019 Biodiesel Supercritico

    2/6

  • 7/30/2019 Biodiesel Supercritico

    3/6

    ratio of methanol to Cynara oil rises and that the optimal

    ratios for its transesterication result between 4.05 and 5.67.

    For its molar ratio less than 4.05, the reaction is reported to

    be incomplete, whereas at higher than 5.67, it becomes

    difcult to separate glycerin from methanol as a by-product.

    Another worker [12] further noted that a 98% conversion ofvegetable oils could be made to the methyl esters at the

    molar ratio of 6, but that even higher molar ratio up to 45

    was necessary when the oil contained a large amount of free

    fatty acids. However, as the molar ratio decreased to the

    theoretical value of 3, its conversion was decreased down

    to 82%.

    In this work, therefore, the effect of the molar ratio of

    methanol to rapeseed oil was studied in the range between

    3.5 and 42 on the yield of methyl esters formed for super-

    critical methanol treatments, assuming that the average

    molecular weight of rapeseed oil is 806 as triglycerides.

    Fig. 2 shows the obtained HPLC chromatograms of rape-seed oil as treated in various molar ratios for 4 min under

    supercritical conditions. In the previous study [5], it was

    demonstrated that the intensive peak in the chromatogram

    observed in the short retention times (3 10 min) are methyl

    esteried compounds, while in the longer retention times,

    intermediates such as monoglycerides and diglycerides

    appeared (1020 min). Therefore, from Fig. 2, it is apparent

    that the conversion state of rapeseed oil is different as

    various molar ratios of methanol were applied to the trans-

    esterication reaction of the rapeseed oil. With a higher

    molar ratio of methanol applied, the methyl esteried

    compounds are increased with a decrease in the intermedi-

    ate compounds.

    Fig. 3 shows the content of methyl esters produced as

    different supercritical treatments were carried out at

    3508C. For a molar ratio of 42 in methanol, almost complete

    conversion was achieved in a yield of 95% of methyl esters,

    whereas for the lower molar ratio of 6 or less, incomplete

    conversion was apparent with the lower yield of methyl

    esters. These lines of evidence, therefore, indicate that the

    higher molar ratios of methanol result in the better transes-terication reaction, due perhaps to the increased contact

    area between methanol and triglycerides.

    3.2. Effect of temperature on methyl esters formation

    To determine the effect of temperature on methyl esters

    formation, transesterication reactions of rapeseed oil were

    carried out with a xed molar ratio of 42 in methanol, the

    best condition found in Fig. 3, at various temperatures

    ranging from 200 to 5008C. Fig. 4 shows the obtained

    HPLC chromatograms of rapeseed oil as treated in various

    conditions of temperatures and reaction times, while thecontent of methyl esters obtained is shown in Fig. 5, in

    which the obtained experimental data are shown by the

    symbols, whereas the simulated curves are shown by the

    lines as discussed later.

    At temperatures of 200 and 2308C, the relatively low

    conversion to methyl esters is evident in Figs. 4 and 5 due

    to the subcritical state of methanol. In these conditions,

    methyl esters formed are at most about 68 and 70% at 200

    and 2308C, respectively, at 3600 s (1 h) treatment. These

    results are in good accordance with those already reported

    [10].

    At a temperature of 2708C, the conversion rate is still low

    which might be related with the stability of supercriticalcondition. As can be seen in Fig. 1, maximum pressure

    reached in this treatment is 14 MPa, still in the transition

    between subcritical and supercritical state of methanol.

    However, at 3008C, a considerable change in the conversion

    rate can be seen with about 80% of methyl esters produced

    in 240 s. As observed in the previous study [5], at 3508C,

    240 s treatment resulted in a high conversion of rapeseed oil

    to methyl esters with its yield of 95%.

    An important result here is that the composition of methyl

    esters yielded is very similar with that prepared by the

    conventional commercial process with alkaline catalyst.

    D. Kusdiana, S. Saka / Fuel 80 (2001) 693 698 695

    Fig. 3. Effect of the molar ratios of methanol to rapeseed oil in trans-

    esterication reaction on producing methyl esters, as treated at 350 8C.

    Fig. 4. HPLC chromatograms of rapeseed oil as treated at various condi-

    tions of temperatures and reaction times with molar ratio of 42 in methanol.

  • 7/30/2019 Biodiesel Supercritico

    4/6

    At even higher temperature of 4008C, the transesterication

    reaction is essentially completed for 120 s to convert almost

    all rapeseed oil to their methyl esters. However, in such ahigh reaction temperature, new peaks in the shorter reten-

    tion time (3 4 min) are dominating in the HPLC chromato-

    grams as shown in Fig. 4 and the previous study [5]. This

    indicates that decomposition reaction takes place at

    temperature above 4008C due to the thermal degradation.

    As a result, the transesterication reactions of rapeseed

    oil to methyl esters proceed appropriately at temperature of

    3508C under supercritical condition of methanol without

    any catalyst used.

    3.3. Kinetics of rapeseed oil to methyl esters

    To correlate experimental data and to quantify thetemperature and reaction time effects observed above, the

    experimental results were analyzed further in terms of the

    kinetics of rapeseed oil to methyl esters. As mentioned

    earlier, the model is based on overall reaction. Since the

    molar ratio of methanol to rapeseed oil was xed to be 42,

    the concentration of methanol was not taken into account, as

    reported by other researchers [10,12].

    Diasakov [10] proposed the thermal transesterication

    reaction to be divided into 3 steps. Triglycerides react

    with methanol to produce diglycerides, and then diglyc-

    erides react to produce monoglycerides. Finally monoglyc-

    erides react with methanol to give glycerin as a by-product.

    At each reaction step, one molecule of methylated

    compounds is produced for each molecule of methanol

    consumed. As a result, six different rate constants of the

    reaction are reported for the whole reaction.

    Due to reality that nal products for the whole reaction in

    the transesterication reaction for biodiesel fuel production

    are methyl esters with glycerin, we dened a simpler math-

    ematical model for this reaction by ignoring the intermedi-

    ate reactions of diglycerides and monoglycerides, so the 3

    steps can be simplied to be one step as follows:

    This reaction is assumed to proceed in the rst order

    reaction as a function of the concentration of triglycerides

    (TG) and reaction temperature. The rate constant of the

    reaction can be determined based on the increased amount

    of the product that occurs in some reaction time interval

    [13,14], or alternatively, based on the decreased amount

    of one reactant. In this work, the decreased amount of one

    reactant, that is TG, was chosen. Therefore, the rate constant

    of the reaction can be given by Eq. (1)

    Rate 2dTG

    dt

    1

    where [TG] refers to the content of vegetable oil used in this

    study. In this supercritical methanol method, three species

    were dened as methyl esters (ME), glycerin (GL) and

    unmethyl esteried compounds (uME) which include trigly-

    cerides, diglycerides, monoglycerides and unreacted free

    fatty acids. Therefore, Eq. (1) can be modied to be

    Rate 2duME

    dt2

    or

    2duME

    dt kuME 3

    where [uME] refers to the content of the species, excluding

    methyl esters and glycerin, that result or remain after the

    supercritical treatment was carried out. Assuming that the

    initial concentration of uME, at time t 0; is uME, 0 and

    that it falls down to uME, t at some later time t, the

    integration gives

    2

    uME;tuME;0

    duME

    uMEkt

    0dt 4

    D. Kusdiana, S. Saka / Fuel 80 (2001) 693 698696

    Fig. 5. Effect the reaction temperature on the methyl esters formation. The

    experimental data are presented by the symbols, whereas the solid lines are

    simulated curves based on Eqs. (3) and (6).

    Fig. 6. Semilog plot of unmethyl esters content in rapeseed oil during

    transesterication reaction. Legends see Fig. 5.

  • 7/30/2019 Biodiesel Supercritico

    5/6

    and

    2lnuME;t

    uME; 0 kt 5

    or

    K lnuME;t 2 lnuME; 0

    t6

    Fig. 6 shows the correlation between the content of

    unmethyl esterifed compounds and reaction times. As

    mentioned previously, unmethyl esteried compounds are

    dened as other compounds obtained from the upper portion

    excluding ve types of methyl esters, such as methyl palmi-

    tate, methyl oleate, methyl stearate, methyl linoleate and

    methyl linolenate. The straight line was determined to t

    the data in order to adopt the rst order rate equation.

    Based on the results in Fig. 6, the rate constant was

    obtained for each reaction temperature as shown in Table1 and the corresponding Arrhenius plot for this method is

    presented in Fig. 7. It is evident that at subcritical tempera-

    ture below 2398C, the reaction rates are so low but much

    higher at supercritical state, with the rate constant increased

    by a factor of about 85 at the temperature of 3508C.

    Liquid methanol is a polar solvent and has hydrogen

    bondings between OH oxygen and OH hydrogen to form

    methanol clusters. Because the degree of hydrogen bonding

    decreases with increasing temperature, the polarity of

    methanol would decrease in supercritical state. This

    means that supercritical methanol has a hydrophobic nature

    with the lower dielectric constant. As a result, non-polar

    triglycerides can be well solvated with supercritical metha-

    nol to form a single phase of vegetable oil/methanol

    mixture. This phenomenon with the high temperature con-

    ditions seems to be likely to promote transesterication

    reaction of rapeseed oil.

    The simulation was made on a relationship between the

    formation of methyl esters and reaction times, based on Eqs.

    (3) and (6) to examine the tness of the experimental results,

    as shown in Fig. 5. In this gure, the simulated curves are

    shown by lines and the experimental data are represented by

    symbols. In the subcritical temperature, simulated curves

    are somewhat different from those of experimental data.

    This would be because at the longer treatment, the conver-

    sion rate is low due to the equilibrium reaction approached.However, at the supercritical state, the simulated curves t

    well with the experimental results in all cases. Therefore, a

    simple method proposed to determine the rate constants in

    transesterication must be valid.

    4. Concluding remarks

    A highly efcient transesterication process has been

    described and the proposed kinetics in transesterication

    of rapeseed oil has been proven to t very well with those

    of experimental data. A reaction temperature of 3508C withthe molar ratio of methanol being 42 were considered as the

    best condition for a free-catalyst process of biodiesel fuel

    production. The supercritical methanol method, therefore,

    offers a potentially low cost method with simpler technol-

    ogy for producing an alternative fuel for compression igni-

    tion engines. The considerable yield of methyl esters by the

    environmentally friendly method renders this technique

    ideally suited for industrialization.

    References

    [1] Serdari A, Lois E, Stournas S. Ind Engng Chem Res 1999;38:

    3543.

    [2] Aksoy HA, Karaosmanoglu BF, Yatmaz HC, Civelekoglu H. Fuel

    1990;69:600.

    [3] Schwab AW, Bagby MO, Freedman B. Fuel 1987;66:1372.

    [4] Boocock DGB, Konar SK, Mao V, Lee C, Buligan S. JAOCS

    1998;75:1167.

    [5] Saka S, Dadan K. Biodiesel fuel from rapeseed oil as prepared in

    supercritical methanol. Fuel 2001;80:225.

    [6] Deslandes N, Bellenger V, Jafol F, Verdu J. Appl Polym Sci

    1998;69:2663.

    [7] Dufek EJ, Buttereld RO, Frankel EN. JAOCS 1972;49:302.

    [8] Freedman B, Buttereld RO, Pryde EH. JAOCS 1986;63:1375.

    [9] Noureddin H, Zhu D. JAOCS 1997;74:1457.

    D. Kusdiana, S. Saka / Fuel 80 (2001) 693 698 697

    Table 1

    The rate constant of transesterication reaction

    Reaction condition k (s21)

    Temperature (8C) Pressure (MPa)

    200 7 0.0002

    230 9 0.0003270 12 0.0007

    300 14 0.0071

    350 19 0.0178

    385 65 0.0249

    431 90 0.0503

    487 105 0.0803

    Fig. 7. First order reaction rate constant in Arrhenius plot of rapeseed oil in

    methanol during transesterication reaction.

  • 7/30/2019 Biodiesel Supercritico

    6/6

    [10] Diasakov M, Loulodi A, Papayannakos N. Fuel 1998;77:1297.

    [11] Encinar JM, Gonzalez JF, Sabio E, Ramino MG. Ind Engng Chem

    Res 1999;38:2927.

    [12] Freedman B, Pryde CH, Mounts TL. JAOCS 1984;61:1638.

    [13] Barrow GM. Physical chemistry. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kokusha Ltd,

    1973 (p. 419).

    [14] Steinfeld JI, FranciscoJS, Hase WL. Chemical kinetics and dynamics.

    New York: Prentice Hall, 1989 (p. 6).

    D. Kusdiana, S. Saka / Fuel 80 (2001) 693 698698