biodiesel supercritico
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Biodiesel Supercritico
1/6
Kinetics of transesterication in rapeseed oil to biodiesel fuel as treated insupercritical methanol
D. Kusdiana, S. Saka*
Department of Socio-Environmental Energy Science, Graduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University, Yoshida Honmachi, Sakyo-ku,
Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
Received 28 December 1999; accepted 3 August 2000
Abstract
A kinetic study in free catalyst transesterication of rapeseed oil was made in subcritical and supercritical methanol under differentreaction conditions of temperatures and reaction times. Runs were made in a bath-type reaction vessel ranging from 2008C in subcritical
temperature to 5008C at supercritical state with different molar ratios of methanol to rapeseed oil to determine rate constants by employing a
simple method. As a result, the conversion rate of rapeseed oil to its methyl esters was found to increase dramatically in the supercritical state,
and reaction temperature of 3508C was considered as the best condition, with the molar ratio of methanol in rapeseed oil being 42. q 2001
Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Kinetics of transesterication; Supercritical methanol; Methyl esters; Biodiesel fuel
1. Introduction
Transesterication of vegetable oils with simple alcoholhas long been a preferred method for producing biodiesel
fuel [13]. Generally speaking, there are two methods of
transesterication reaction. One is the method using a cata-
lyst and the other is without the help of a catalyst. The
former method has a long story of development and now
biodiesel fuel produced by this method is in the market in
some countries such as North America, Japan and some
west European countries.
However, there are at least two problems associated with
this process; the process is relatively time consuming and
purication of the product for catalyst and saponied
products are necessary. The rst problem due to the two
phase nature of vegetable oil/methanol mixture requiresvigorous stirring to proceed in the transesterication reac-
tion. To solve this problem, Boocock et al. reported that the
use of a simple ether such as tetrahydrofuran can make this
two phase nature into one phase of its mixture and that
methyl esters can be produced in less than 15 min depending
on the catalyst concentration [4]. Yet, the catalyst problem
cannot be solved for purication. Therefore, this conven-
tional process still requires a high production cost and
energy. The overall process, thus, includes transesterica-
tion reaction, recovery of unreacted methanol, purication
of methyl esters from catalyst and separation of glycerin as aco-product from saponied products.
The latter method involves uncatalyzed transesterica-
tion of vegetable oil in supercritical methanol as recently
reported by Saka and Kusdiana [5]. The supercritical state of
methanol is believed to solve the two phase nature of oil/
methanol mixture to form a single phase due to a decrease in
dielectric constant of methanol in supercritical state [6]. As
a result, the reaction was found to be complete in a very
short time within 24 min, as described in their previous
work [5]. In addition, because of non-catalytic process, the
purication of products after transesterication reaction is
much simpler and environmentally friendly, compared with
the conventional commercial method in which all thecatalyst and saponied products have to be removed for
biodiesel fuel.
Some researchers have reported kinetics for both acid-
and alkali-catalyzed transesterication reactions. Dufek
and coworkers studied the acid-catalyzed esterication
and transesterication of 9(10)-carboxystearic acid and its
mono- and di-methyl esters [7]. Freedman et al. reported
transesterication reaction of soybean oil and other vegeta-
ble oils with alcohols [8], and examined in their study were
the effects of the type of alcohol, molar ratio, type and
amount of catalyst and reaction temperature on rate
Fuel 80 (2001) 693698
0016-2361/01/$ - see front matter q 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
PII: S0016-2361(00) 00140-X
www.elsevier.com/locate/fuel
* Corresponding author. Tel./fax:181-75-753-4738.
E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Saka).
-
7/30/2019 Biodiesel Supercritico
2/6
-
7/30/2019 Biodiesel Supercritico
3/6
ratio of methanol to Cynara oil rises and that the optimal
ratios for its transesterication result between 4.05 and 5.67.
For its molar ratio less than 4.05, the reaction is reported to
be incomplete, whereas at higher than 5.67, it becomes
difcult to separate glycerin from methanol as a by-product.
Another worker [12] further noted that a 98% conversion ofvegetable oils could be made to the methyl esters at the
molar ratio of 6, but that even higher molar ratio up to 45
was necessary when the oil contained a large amount of free
fatty acids. However, as the molar ratio decreased to the
theoretical value of 3, its conversion was decreased down
to 82%.
In this work, therefore, the effect of the molar ratio of
methanol to rapeseed oil was studied in the range between
3.5 and 42 on the yield of methyl esters formed for super-
critical methanol treatments, assuming that the average
molecular weight of rapeseed oil is 806 as triglycerides.
Fig. 2 shows the obtained HPLC chromatograms of rape-seed oil as treated in various molar ratios for 4 min under
supercritical conditions. In the previous study [5], it was
demonstrated that the intensive peak in the chromatogram
observed in the short retention times (3 10 min) are methyl
esteried compounds, while in the longer retention times,
intermediates such as monoglycerides and diglycerides
appeared (1020 min). Therefore, from Fig. 2, it is apparent
that the conversion state of rapeseed oil is different as
various molar ratios of methanol were applied to the trans-
esterication reaction of the rapeseed oil. With a higher
molar ratio of methanol applied, the methyl esteried
compounds are increased with a decrease in the intermedi-
ate compounds.
Fig. 3 shows the content of methyl esters produced as
different supercritical treatments were carried out at
3508C. For a molar ratio of 42 in methanol, almost complete
conversion was achieved in a yield of 95% of methyl esters,
whereas for the lower molar ratio of 6 or less, incomplete
conversion was apparent with the lower yield of methyl
esters. These lines of evidence, therefore, indicate that the
higher molar ratios of methanol result in the better transes-terication reaction, due perhaps to the increased contact
area between methanol and triglycerides.
3.2. Effect of temperature on methyl esters formation
To determine the effect of temperature on methyl esters
formation, transesterication reactions of rapeseed oil were
carried out with a xed molar ratio of 42 in methanol, the
best condition found in Fig. 3, at various temperatures
ranging from 200 to 5008C. Fig. 4 shows the obtained
HPLC chromatograms of rapeseed oil as treated in various
conditions of temperatures and reaction times, while thecontent of methyl esters obtained is shown in Fig. 5, in
which the obtained experimental data are shown by the
symbols, whereas the simulated curves are shown by the
lines as discussed later.
At temperatures of 200 and 2308C, the relatively low
conversion to methyl esters is evident in Figs. 4 and 5 due
to the subcritical state of methanol. In these conditions,
methyl esters formed are at most about 68 and 70% at 200
and 2308C, respectively, at 3600 s (1 h) treatment. These
results are in good accordance with those already reported
[10].
At a temperature of 2708C, the conversion rate is still low
which might be related with the stability of supercriticalcondition. As can be seen in Fig. 1, maximum pressure
reached in this treatment is 14 MPa, still in the transition
between subcritical and supercritical state of methanol.
However, at 3008C, a considerable change in the conversion
rate can be seen with about 80% of methyl esters produced
in 240 s. As observed in the previous study [5], at 3508C,
240 s treatment resulted in a high conversion of rapeseed oil
to methyl esters with its yield of 95%.
An important result here is that the composition of methyl
esters yielded is very similar with that prepared by the
conventional commercial process with alkaline catalyst.
D. Kusdiana, S. Saka / Fuel 80 (2001) 693 698 695
Fig. 3. Effect of the molar ratios of methanol to rapeseed oil in trans-
esterication reaction on producing methyl esters, as treated at 350 8C.
Fig. 4. HPLC chromatograms of rapeseed oil as treated at various condi-
tions of temperatures and reaction times with molar ratio of 42 in methanol.
-
7/30/2019 Biodiesel Supercritico
4/6
At even higher temperature of 4008C, the transesterication
reaction is essentially completed for 120 s to convert almost
all rapeseed oil to their methyl esters. However, in such ahigh reaction temperature, new peaks in the shorter reten-
tion time (3 4 min) are dominating in the HPLC chromato-
grams as shown in Fig. 4 and the previous study [5]. This
indicates that decomposition reaction takes place at
temperature above 4008C due to the thermal degradation.
As a result, the transesterication reactions of rapeseed
oil to methyl esters proceed appropriately at temperature of
3508C under supercritical condition of methanol without
any catalyst used.
3.3. Kinetics of rapeseed oil to methyl esters
To correlate experimental data and to quantify thetemperature and reaction time effects observed above, the
experimental results were analyzed further in terms of the
kinetics of rapeseed oil to methyl esters. As mentioned
earlier, the model is based on overall reaction. Since the
molar ratio of methanol to rapeseed oil was xed to be 42,
the concentration of methanol was not taken into account, as
reported by other researchers [10,12].
Diasakov [10] proposed the thermal transesterication
reaction to be divided into 3 steps. Triglycerides react
with methanol to produce diglycerides, and then diglyc-
erides react to produce monoglycerides. Finally monoglyc-
erides react with methanol to give glycerin as a by-product.
At each reaction step, one molecule of methylated
compounds is produced for each molecule of methanol
consumed. As a result, six different rate constants of the
reaction are reported for the whole reaction.
Due to reality that nal products for the whole reaction in
the transesterication reaction for biodiesel fuel production
are methyl esters with glycerin, we dened a simpler math-
ematical model for this reaction by ignoring the intermedi-
ate reactions of diglycerides and monoglycerides, so the 3
steps can be simplied to be one step as follows:
This reaction is assumed to proceed in the rst order
reaction as a function of the concentration of triglycerides
(TG) and reaction temperature. The rate constant of the
reaction can be determined based on the increased amount
of the product that occurs in some reaction time interval
[13,14], or alternatively, based on the decreased amount
of one reactant. In this work, the decreased amount of one
reactant, that is TG, was chosen. Therefore, the rate constant
of the reaction can be given by Eq. (1)
Rate 2dTG
dt
1
where [TG] refers to the content of vegetable oil used in this
study. In this supercritical methanol method, three species
were dened as methyl esters (ME), glycerin (GL) and
unmethyl esteried compounds (uME) which include trigly-
cerides, diglycerides, monoglycerides and unreacted free
fatty acids. Therefore, Eq. (1) can be modied to be
Rate 2duME
dt2
or
2duME
dt kuME 3
where [uME] refers to the content of the species, excluding
methyl esters and glycerin, that result or remain after the
supercritical treatment was carried out. Assuming that the
initial concentration of uME, at time t 0; is uME, 0 and
that it falls down to uME, t at some later time t, the
integration gives
2
uME;tuME;0
duME
uMEkt
0dt 4
D. Kusdiana, S. Saka / Fuel 80 (2001) 693 698696
Fig. 5. Effect the reaction temperature on the methyl esters formation. The
experimental data are presented by the symbols, whereas the solid lines are
simulated curves based on Eqs. (3) and (6).
Fig. 6. Semilog plot of unmethyl esters content in rapeseed oil during
transesterication reaction. Legends see Fig. 5.
-
7/30/2019 Biodiesel Supercritico
5/6
and
2lnuME;t
uME; 0 kt 5
or
K lnuME;t 2 lnuME; 0
t6
Fig. 6 shows the correlation between the content of
unmethyl esterifed compounds and reaction times. As
mentioned previously, unmethyl esteried compounds are
dened as other compounds obtained from the upper portion
excluding ve types of methyl esters, such as methyl palmi-
tate, methyl oleate, methyl stearate, methyl linoleate and
methyl linolenate. The straight line was determined to t
the data in order to adopt the rst order rate equation.
Based on the results in Fig. 6, the rate constant was
obtained for each reaction temperature as shown in Table1 and the corresponding Arrhenius plot for this method is
presented in Fig. 7. It is evident that at subcritical tempera-
ture below 2398C, the reaction rates are so low but much
higher at supercritical state, with the rate constant increased
by a factor of about 85 at the temperature of 3508C.
Liquid methanol is a polar solvent and has hydrogen
bondings between OH oxygen and OH hydrogen to form
methanol clusters. Because the degree of hydrogen bonding
decreases with increasing temperature, the polarity of
methanol would decrease in supercritical state. This
means that supercritical methanol has a hydrophobic nature
with the lower dielectric constant. As a result, non-polar
triglycerides can be well solvated with supercritical metha-
nol to form a single phase of vegetable oil/methanol
mixture. This phenomenon with the high temperature con-
ditions seems to be likely to promote transesterication
reaction of rapeseed oil.
The simulation was made on a relationship between the
formation of methyl esters and reaction times, based on Eqs.
(3) and (6) to examine the tness of the experimental results,
as shown in Fig. 5. In this gure, the simulated curves are
shown by lines and the experimental data are represented by
symbols. In the subcritical temperature, simulated curves
are somewhat different from those of experimental data.
This would be because at the longer treatment, the conver-
sion rate is low due to the equilibrium reaction approached.However, at the supercritical state, the simulated curves t
well with the experimental results in all cases. Therefore, a
simple method proposed to determine the rate constants in
transesterication must be valid.
4. Concluding remarks
A highly efcient transesterication process has been
described and the proposed kinetics in transesterication
of rapeseed oil has been proven to t very well with those
of experimental data. A reaction temperature of 3508C withthe molar ratio of methanol being 42 were considered as the
best condition for a free-catalyst process of biodiesel fuel
production. The supercritical methanol method, therefore,
offers a potentially low cost method with simpler technol-
ogy for producing an alternative fuel for compression igni-
tion engines. The considerable yield of methyl esters by the
environmentally friendly method renders this technique
ideally suited for industrialization.
References
[1] Serdari A, Lois E, Stournas S. Ind Engng Chem Res 1999;38:
3543.
[2] Aksoy HA, Karaosmanoglu BF, Yatmaz HC, Civelekoglu H. Fuel
1990;69:600.
[3] Schwab AW, Bagby MO, Freedman B. Fuel 1987;66:1372.
[4] Boocock DGB, Konar SK, Mao V, Lee C, Buligan S. JAOCS
1998;75:1167.
[5] Saka S, Dadan K. Biodiesel fuel from rapeseed oil as prepared in
supercritical methanol. Fuel 2001;80:225.
[6] Deslandes N, Bellenger V, Jafol F, Verdu J. Appl Polym Sci
1998;69:2663.
[7] Dufek EJ, Buttereld RO, Frankel EN. JAOCS 1972;49:302.
[8] Freedman B, Buttereld RO, Pryde EH. JAOCS 1986;63:1375.
[9] Noureddin H, Zhu D. JAOCS 1997;74:1457.
D. Kusdiana, S. Saka / Fuel 80 (2001) 693 698 697
Table 1
The rate constant of transesterication reaction
Reaction condition k (s21)
Temperature (8C) Pressure (MPa)
200 7 0.0002
230 9 0.0003270 12 0.0007
300 14 0.0071
350 19 0.0178
385 65 0.0249
431 90 0.0503
487 105 0.0803
Fig. 7. First order reaction rate constant in Arrhenius plot of rapeseed oil in
methanol during transesterication reaction.
-
7/30/2019 Biodiesel Supercritico
6/6
[10] Diasakov M, Loulodi A, Papayannakos N. Fuel 1998;77:1297.
[11] Encinar JM, Gonzalez JF, Sabio E, Ramino MG. Ind Engng Chem
Res 1999;38:2927.
[12] Freedman B, Pryde CH, Mounts TL. JAOCS 1984;61:1638.
[13] Barrow GM. Physical chemistry. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kokusha Ltd,
1973 (p. 419).
[14] Steinfeld JI, FranciscoJS, Hase WL. Chemical kinetics and dynamics.
New York: Prentice Hall, 1989 (p. 6).
D. Kusdiana, S. Saka / Fuel 80 (2001) 693 698698