carmaker - ipg automotive · conclusion. team 02 introduction why carmaker ? ... transmission...
TRANSCRIPT
Contents
01
Introduction
• Lead the team forward
• Personalization
Why CarMaker ?
• Car Modeling• Limited Slip Differential
• Tire
• Suspension
• Aerodynamics
• Correlation• Track Modelling
• Electronics
• Driver Correlation
• Vehicle Correlation
Modelling
• Pure Performance Criteria
• Driving Criteria
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
Team
02
Introduction
Why CarMaker ?
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
• Founded in December 2011 by Sébastien Loeb & Dominique HEINTZ• Composed of fifteen professionals• Involved in various competitions:
• Vehicle Dynamics expertise
24 Hours Of Le Mans
European Le Mans Series
GT Championship
Porsche SuperCup
Lead the team forward
03
Steady state simulation
• Simplified Models
• Implementationduration reduced
Dynamicsimulation
• Speed-dependent model
• Every physicalphenomenon modeled
• Adaptive driver model
• Understand interaction between all the element of a car • Reduce the spectrum of settings during real tests
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
Personalization
04
• Motorsport and automotive category require specific needs :• Aerodynamics in Motorsport• Comfort in Industry
• Adapt IPG CarMaker to these needs:
Open IntegrationPlatform
Adaptation
Innovation
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
Car Modelling Correlation
Limited Slip Differential Tire Suspension Aerodynamics
05
Engine &
Transmission
Aerodynamic
Suspension kinematic & compliance
Chassis
Tires
Limited slip differential3rd Spring
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
Limited Slip Differential Tire Suspension Aerodynamics
Car Modelling Correlation
06
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
ConclusionIPG
Viscoélastique Free Driveline
SLR Characteristic
Curves
Limited SlipDifferential
with
Preload
Car Modelling Correlation
07
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
Limited Slip Differential Tire Suspension Aerodynamics
Flat trackmeasurement
Skid Trailer
Tire modelling
Car Modelling Correlation
08
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
Wheel Input
LoadInclination
Velocity
Forces at
Contact patch
Tire Rolling Radius
To Wheel Center By CarMaker
Limited Slip Differential Tire Suspension Aerodynamics
• CPI Model
Car Modelling Correlation
09
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
Contact PatchCalculation
Tire LoadedRadius
Tire Rolling Radius
Forces / Torque
at Contact patch
To Wheel Center By
SLR
• STI Model
Limited Slip Differential Tire Suspension Aerodynamics
Car Modelling Correlation
10
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
3rd Spring
Average SpringDeflection
Static Gap
Ride Height Control
Limited Slip Differential Tire Suspension Aerodynamics
Car Modelling Correlation
11
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
To Wheel Center By
SLR
AerodynamicDownforce
AerodynamicDrag
AerodynamicBalance
• Correction of tire crushing• Use of IPG Body Sensor to modelize ride heigth behaviour• Application of aerodynamic drag & downforce (CLA and CDA)
Limited Slip Differential Tire Suspension Aerodynamics
Car Modelling Correlation
12
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
To Wheel Center By
SLR
• Track Modelling
• Development of tools for modeling track• GPS measurements coupled with an inertial measurement unit• Use of the Kalman filter to reduce the measurement noise
Track Modelling Electronics Driver Correlation Vehicle Correlation
13
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
To Wheel Center By
SLR
• Beams development • Autonomous assembly implantable on any vehicle • Additional Systems using this architecture in the vehicle
• Implementation of specific sensors• Standard sensors: stress, temperature• Specific sensors: slip angle, tire pressure sensors
Car Modelling Correlation
Track Modelling Electronics river Correlation Vehicle Correlation
14
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
To Wheel Center By
SLR
Car Modelling Correlation
Track Modelling Electronics Driver Correlation hicle Correlation
15
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
To Wheel Center By
SLR
Car Modelling Correlation
Track Modelling Electronics Driver Correlation Vehicle Correlation
16
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
To Wheel Center By
SLR
Car Modelling Correlation
Track Modelling Electronics Driver Correlation Vehicle Correlation
VIDEO
Pure Performance Criteria Driving Criteria
17
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
To Wheel Center By
SLR
Pure Performance Criteria Driving Criteria
18
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
To Wheel Center By
SLR
19
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
To Wheel Center By
SLR
Electric energy management
Vehicle dynamics simulation
Complete car optimisation
Formula E
20
Introduction
Why CarMaker
Modelling
Utilization
Innovation
Conclusion
To Wheel Center By
SLR
Complete vehicle
dynamicsexpertise
Steady state simulation
Dynamic simulation
Powerful tool Adaptation Innovation