chapter 15. bulk sales law

5
SALES REVIEWER (20132014) ATTY.RAY PAOLO SANTIAGO NOTES BY RACHELLE ANNE GUTIERREZ (UPDATED:MAY 21, 2014) CHAPTER 15: BULK SALES LAW (ACT NO. 3952) I. Scope (Chin v. Uy, 40 O.G. 4 Supp. 52) Chin v. Uy Doctrine: A sale made of all the effects in the vendor's store without the buyer being furnished a sworn list of creditors as required by Sec 3, is null and void irrespective of the good or bad faith of the buyer, and judgment creditors may treat such sale as never having been made and proceed to have execution levied on the properties thus sold. I. Transactions covered by the law Intended as a species of bankruptcy law to protect supply creditors/businessmen against preferential/fraudulent transfers done by merchants Intended to prevent a situation where merchants would sell their businesses then vanish, leaving their creditors without recourse against the “buyers in good faith and for value.” Law covers all transactions, good faith or not, that are within the description of a “bulk sale” Primary Objective is to compel seller in bulk to: o Execute and deliver a verified list of creditors to the buyer o Give notice of the intended sale to the creditors o Use the proceeds to pay outstanding liabilities This is considered as being a valid exercise of the State’s police power. Liwanag v. Menghraj, 72 Phil. 410 The Bulk Sales Law must be construed strictly. Thus, the disposal by the owner of a foundry shop of all his iron bars and others does not fall under the law, because the contents of a foundry shop are not wares and merchandise. The Law only covers sales in bulk of fixtures and equipment used in the mercantile business, which involves the buying and selling of merchandise. xPeople v. Wong, [CA] 50 O.G. 4867 (1954). The Law applies to merchants who are in the business of selling goods and wares and similar merchandise, and cannot cover the sale of assets by a manufacturer since the nature of his business does not partake of merchandise. DBP v. The Honorable Judge of the RTC of Manila, 86 O.G. No. 6 1137 (05 February 1990). Development Bank of the Philippines v. RTC of Manila Facts: In 1978, Pioneer Glass Manufacturing Corp.purchased from Yu (under Ancar Equipment Parts and Tonicar) equipment parts worth P7,000. However, Pioneer failed or refused to pay upon demand. Without informing Yu, Pioneer Glass transferred all its assets to DBP in a "deed of cession of property in payment of obligation" or dacion en pago. In turn, DBP sold these assets to Union Glass that same year. In 1983, Yu instituted an action against Pioneer Glass, DBP, and Union Glass, asserting that the transfer of the assets to DBP was void by reason of fraud. Issue: Whether or not the Bulk Sales Law covers the conveyance in question (its violation would make DBP, Union Glass, and Pioneer Glass

Upload: rache-gutierrez

Post on 22-Apr-2017

248 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chapter 15. Bulk Sales Law

SALES  REVIEWER  (2013-­‐2014)                            ATTY.  RAY  PAOLO  SANTIAGO    

 NOTES  BY  RACHELLE  ANNE  GUTIERREZ  (UPDATED:  MAY  21,  2014)  

CHAPTER  15:  BULK  SALES  LAW  (ACT  NO.  3952)  

 I.  Scope    (Chin  v.  Uy,  40  O.G.  4  Supp.  52)    

Chin  v.  Uy    Doctrine:  A  sale  made  of  all  the  effects  in  the  vendor's  store  without  the  buyer  being   furnished  a   sworn   list  of   creditors  as   required  by  Sec  3,   is  null   and   void   irrespective   of   the   good   or   bad   faith   of   the   buyer,   and  judgment  creditors  may  treat  such  sale  as  never  having  been  made  and  proceed  to  have  execution  levied  on  the  properties  thus  sold.  I.  Transactions  covered  by  the  law    

• Intended   as   a   species   of   bankruptcy   law   to   protect   supply  creditors/businessmen  against  preferential/fraudulent  transfers  done  by  merchants  

• Intended   to   prevent   a   situation   where   merchants   would   sell  their   businesses   then   vanish,   leaving   their   creditors   without  recourse  against  the  “buyers  in  good  faith  and  for  value.”  

• Law   covers   all   transactions,   good   faith   or   not,   that   are   within  the  description  of  a  “bulk  sale”  

• Primary  Objective  is  to  compel  seller  in  bulk  to:  o Execute   and   deliver   a   verified   list   of   creditors   to   the  

buyer    o Give  notice  of  the  intended  sale  to  the  creditors  o Use  the  proceeds  to  pay  outstanding  liabilities  

• This  is  considered  as  being  a  valid  exercise  of  the  State’s  police  power.  Liwanag  v.  Menghraj,  72  Phil.  410  

• The  Bulk  Sales  Law  must  be  construed  strictly.  Thus,  the  disposal  by   the  owner  of  a   foundry   shop  of  all  his   iron  bars  and  others  does  not  fall  under  the   law,  because  the  contents  of  a  foundry  shop  are  not  wares  and  merchandise.    The  Law  only  covers  sales  in   bulk   of   fixtures   and   equipment   used   in   the   mercantile  business,  which  involves  the  buying  and  selling  of  merchandise.  xPeople  v.  Wong,  [CA]  50  O.G.  4867  (1954).  

• The  Law  applies  to  merchants  who  are  in  the  business  of  selling  goods  and  wares  and  similar  merchandise,  and  cannot  cover  the  sale  of  assets  by  a  manufacturer  since  the  nature  of  his  business  does  not  partake  of  merchandise.  DBP  v.  The  Honorable  Judge  of  the  RTC  of  Manila,  86  O.G.  No.  6  1137  (05  February  1990).  

 Development  Bank  of  the  Philippines  v.  RTC  of  Manila  

 Facts: In   1978,   Pioneer   Glass   Manufacturing   Corp.purchased   from   Yu  (under   Ancar   Equipment   Parts   and   Tonicar)   equipment   parts   worth  P7,000.   However,   Pioneer   failed   or   refused   to   pay   upon   demand.  Without  informing  Yu,  Pioneer  Glass  transferred  all  its  assets  to  DBP  in  a  "deed   of   cession   of   property   in   payment   of   obligation"   or   dacion   en  pago.  In  turn,  DBP  sold  these  assets  to  Union  Glass  that  same  year.  In  1983,  Yu   instituted  an  action  against  Pioneer  Glass,  DBP,  and  Union  Glass,   asserting   that   the   transfer   of   the   assets   to   DBP   was   void   by  reason  of  fraud.    Issue:  Whether   or   not   the   Bulk   Sales   Law   covers   the   conveyance   in  question  (its  violation  would  make  DBP,  Union  Glass,  and  Pioneer  Glass  

Page 2: Chapter 15. Bulk Sales Law

SALES  REVIEWER  (2013-­‐2014)                            ATTY.  RAY  PAOLO  SANTIAGO    

 NOTES  BY  RACHELLE  ANNE  GUTIERREZ  (UPDATED:  MAY  21,  2014)  

liable  to  Yu)    Held:   NO.   Under   the   Bulk   Sales   Law,   the   terms   "goods"   and  "merchandise,"   having   acquired   a   fixed   meaning,   refer   to   things   and  articles,   which   are   kept   for   sale   by   a   merchant.   Likewise,   the   term  "fixtures"   has   been   interpreted   to   mean   the   chattels,   which   the  merchants  usually  possess  and  annex  to  the  premises  occupied  by  them  in   order   to   store,   handle   and   display   their   goods   and   wares.   The  technicality  of  these  terms  conveys  the   intention  of  the   law  to  apply   it  to  merchants  who   are   in   the   business   of   selling   goods   and  wares   and  similar  merchandise.    In   this   case,   Pioneer   Glass  manufactured   glass   only   on   specific   orders  and  it  did  not  sell  directly  to  consumers  but  manufactured  its  products  only  for  particular  clients.  Thus,  Pioneer  Glass  was  NOT  a  merchandiser.  Moreover,   the   dacion   en   pago   between   Pioneer   and   DBP   transferred  and   conveyed   the   bulk   of   its   corporate   assets   to   extinguish   its  outstanding   debts   to   DBP.   Thus,   the   subject   matter   of   the   deed   of  cession  was  the  assets,  not  stock-­‐in-­‐trade.  Such  conveyance  was  clearly  outside  the  ambit  of  the  Bulk  Sales  Law.  SC  ordered  Pioneer  Glass,  not  DBP  and  Union  Glass,   to  pay  Yu  the  price  of   the  equipment  purchased  plus  interest.    Doctrine:    II.  Coverage  of  “Bulk  Sale”  –  Sale,  transfer,  mortgage  or  assignment  of:    ACT  NO.  3952  Section  2.  Sale  and  transfer  in  bulk.    

Any  sale,  transfer,  mortgage  or  assignment  of  a  stock  of  goods,  wares,  merchandise,   provisions,   or  materials   otherwise   than   in   the  ordinary  course   of   trade   and   the   regular   prosecution   of   the   business   of   the  vendor,  mortgagor,  transferor,  or  assignor,  or  sale,  transfer,  mortgage  or   assignment   of   all,   or   substantially   all,   of   the   business   or   trade  theretofore   conducted   by   the   vendor,   mortgagor,   transferor,   or  assignor,   or   of   all,   or   substantially   all,   of   the   fixtures   and  equipment  used   in  and  about   the  business  of   the  vendor,  mortgagor,   transferor,  or   assignor,   shall   be   deemed   to   be   a   sale   and   transfer   in   bulk,   in  contemplation   of   this   Act:   Provided,   however,   That   if   such   vendor,  mortgagor,   transferor   or   assignor,   produces   and   delivers   a   written  waiver   of   the   provisions   of   this   Act   from   his   creditors   as   shown   by  verified   statements,   then,   and   in   that   case,   the   provisions   of   this  section  shall  not  apply.    

• Three  Types  of  Transaction  1. Extraordinary   Sale   Of   Goods   (Yellow)   !   Goods,   wares,  

merchandise,  provisions  or  material  other   than   in   the  ordinary  course  of  business.  

2. Extraordinary  Sale  Of  Fixtures  And  Equipment  (Pink)  !  All,  or  substantially   all   of   all   or   substantially   all   of   the   fixtures   and  equipment  used  in  and  about  the  business.  

3. Sale  Of  Business  Enterprise  (Green)  !  All,  or  substantially  all  of  the   business   or   trade   theretofore   conducted   by   the   vendor,  mortgagor,  transferor,  or  assignor.  

• Motive/intention/consequence  of  sale  is  not  an  element  o As   long  as   the   transaction   is  within   the  description,  no  

matter  what  it’s  being  done  for,  it  is  covered  by  the  Bulk  Sales  Law.  

Page 3: Chapter 15. Bulk Sales Law

SALES  REVIEWER  (2013-­‐2014)                            ATTY.  RAY  PAOLO  SANTIAGO    

 NOTES  BY  RACHELLE  ANNE  GUTIERREZ  (UPDATED:  MAY  21,  2014)  

• Qualification  of  “in  the  normal  course  of  business”  applies  only  to  the  first  type    

o Second   two   types   are   by   nature   not   in   the   normal  course  of  business.  

• Bulk  sales  are  of  a  nature  that  they  do  not  fall  within  the  normal  course,  which  thus  should  warn  parties  to  such  transactions  

 A.  “Bulk  Sales”  Not  Covered  By  Law  

• Some   exceptions:   even   if   transaction   comes   within   Section   2,  Bulk  Sales  Law  does  not  apply  to  these  cases:  

1. Seller   produces   and   delivers   a   written   waiver   of   the  provisions   of   the   Law   from   his   creditors   as   shown   by  verified  statements;  and  

2. Transactions   effected   by   executors,   administrators,  receivers,   assignees   in   insolvency,   or   public   officers,  acting  under  legal  process.  

 B.  “Business”  Covered  by  the  Law  

• People  v.  Wong,  50  O.G.  4876  o Bulk   sales   law   should   be   construed   strictly   against   the  

State  and  in  favor  of  the  accused.  o In   this   case,   accused   was   held   liable   for   selling   his  

foundry  shop,  along  with  all  other  assets.  The  Supreme  Court  held  that  the  Bulk  Sales  Law  contemplates  sale  of  merchandise,   stock,   and   goods   –   not   the   sale   of   the  whole  shop  with  the  equipment,  credits,  etc.    As  such,  a  foundry   shop   which   does   not   sell   merchandise   is   not  included.  

• Meaning  of  merchandise  and  Stock  

o Merchandise  !   something  sold  everyday,  going   in  and  out   of   the   store,   replaced   by   other   goods   –   things  usually  bought  and  sold  in  trade  by  merchants  

o Stock  !  those  goods  kept  for  sale.  • Development  Bank  of  the  Philippines  v.  RTC  of  Manila,  86  O.G.,  

No.   6,   1137   (05   February   1990)   reiterated   the   Wong   ruling  regarding   applicability   to   bulk   sales   not   involving  merchandise  and  stock.  

• Thus  –   enumeration   in   the   first   type  of  bulk   sales:   only   covers  those  sold  in  the  normal  course  of  business.  

o Wong:   “sale   of   fixtures   and   equipment”   excludes  materials  used  in  the  process  of  production.  

• However,  Wong  and  DPB  rulings  seem  only  to  interpret  the  first  type  

o When   it   comes   to   the   other   two   types,   law   does   not  limit  the  coverage  to  a  particular  type  of  business.  

o We  do  not  consider  the  Wong  and  DBP  rulings  when   it  comes  to  the  other  two  types  of  Bulk  sales  

   III.  Obligations  of  Seller/Encumbrancer  When  Transaction  is  a  Bulk  Sale    

1. To  Deliver  a  Sworn  Statement  of  Listing  of  Creditors  (Section  3)  –   Before   receiving   from   the   vendee,   mortgagee,   or   his,   or   its  agent  or  representative  any  part  of  the  purchase  price  thereof,  or   any   promissory   note,   memorandum,   or   other   evidence  therefor,   to  deliver   to   such   vendee,  mortgagee,   or   agent,   or   if  the  vendee,  mortgagee,  or  agent  be  a  corporation,  then  to  the  president,   vice-­‐president,   treasurer,   secretary   or   manager   of  

Page 4: Chapter 15. Bulk Sales Law

SALES  REVIEWER  (2013-­‐2014)                            ATTY.  RAY  PAOLO  SANTIAGO    

 NOTES  BY  RACHELLE  ANNE  GUTIERREZ  (UPDATED:  MAY  21,  2014)  

said   corporation,   or,   if   such   vendee   or   mortgagee   be   a  partnership   firm,   then   to   a   member   thereof,   a   written  statement,  sworn  to  substantially  as  hereinafter  provided,  of:  

a. The  names  and  addresses  of  all  creditors  to  whom  said  vendor  or  mortgagor  may  be  indebted,  together  with    

b. The   amount   of   indebtedness   due   or   owing,   or   to  become   due   or   owing   by   said   vendor   or  mortgagor   to  each  of  said  creditors  

2. Pro-­‐Rata   Application   of   Proceeds   (Section   4)   –   Applying   the  purchase   or   mortgage  money   of   the   said   property   to   the   pro  rata  payment  of  the  bona  fide  claim  or  claims  of  the  creditors  of  the  vendor  or  mortgagor,  as  shown  upon  such  sworn  statement.  

3. Written  Advance  Disclosure   to  Creditors   (Section  5)  —  It  shall  be  the  duty  of  every  vendor,  transferor,  mortgagor,  or  assignor:  

a. At   least   ten  days  before   the  sale,   transfer  or  execution  of   a   mortgage   upon   any   stock   of   goods,   wares,  merchandise,  provisions  or  materials,  in  bulk,  to  make  a  full  detailed  inventory  thereof  and  to  preserve  the  same  showing  the  quantity  and,  so  far  as  is  possible  with  the  exercise   of   reasonable   diligence,   the   cost   price   to   the  vendor,  transferor,  mortgagor  or  assignor  of  each  article  to  be  included  in  the  sale,  transfer  or  mortgage,  and    

b. Notify   every   creditor   whose   name   and   address   is   set  forth  in  the  verified  statement  of  the  vendor,  transferor,  mortgagor,   or   assignor,   at   least   ten   days   before  transferring   possession   thereof,   personally   or   by  registered   mail,   of   the   price,   terms   conditions   of   the  sale,  transfer,  mortgage,  or  assignment.  

4. Bulk   Transfers   for   Nominal   Value   (Section   7)   –   It   shall   be  unlawful   for   any   person,   firm   or   corporation,   as   owner   of   any  stock  of  goods,  wares,  merchandise,  provisions  or  materials,   in  bulk,  to  transfer  title  to  the  same  without  consideration  or  for  a  nominal  consideration  only.  

 IV.  Consequences  of  Violation  of  the  Law  

• A   sale   in   bulk   done   without   complying   with   the   terms   of   the  Law,  makes   the   transaction   fraudulent   and   void,   but   does   not  change   the   basic   relationship   between   the   seller,  assignor/encumbrancer   and   his   creditor.   The   portion   of   a  judgment   providing   for   subsidiary   liability   is   invalid,   since   the  proper  remedy  of  the  creditor  is  to  collect  on  the  credit  against  the  defendant,  and  if  they  cannot  pay  to  attach  on  the  property  fraudulently   mortgage   since   the   same   still   pertain   to   the  debtors-­‐defendants.    xPeople  v.  Mapoy,  73  Phil.  678  (1942).  

• Section   11:   Imprisonment  of  not   less   that  6  months,  not  more  than  5  years,  w/  fine  not  exceeding  P5,000.  

• We   evaluate   the   effects   of   breaking   the   law   from   3   different  standpoints:    

o On  the  transaction  itself  o On  the  seller  o On  the  buyer  

 A.  On  the  Transaction  itself  

1. If  sworn  listing  of  creditors  is  not  prepared,  or  if  the  proceeds  are  not  applied  to  them,  the  sale  shall  be  fraudulent  and  void.  

o This  is  not  merely  a  presumption:  it  is  in  fact  treated  as  void.    

Page 5: Chapter 15. Bulk Sales Law

SALES  REVIEWER  (2013-­‐2014)                            ATTY.  RAY  PAOLO  SANTIAGO    

 NOTES  BY  RACHELLE  ANNE  GUTIERREZ  (UPDATED:  MAY  21,  2014)  

" No  legal  effects  arise  from  the  transaction  " No  right  of  action  accrues  

• Thus,  the  subject  matter  is  still  owned  by  the  assignor,  and  still  subject  to  the  satisfaction  of  his  liabilities    

• People  v.  Mapoy,  73  Phil.  678  (1942)  o Sale   is   void,   but   the   relationship   between   seller   and  

creditor  is  unchanged.  o Proper   remedy   of   creditor   is   to   collect   on   the   credit  

against   the   defendant,   and   if   he   cannot   pay,   to   attach  on  the  property  fraudulently  sold/mortgaged.    

2. Failure   to   make   an   advanced   written   disclosure   to   creditors  does  not  render  the  sale  fraudulent  and  void.  

• Legal  consequences  of  a  sale  in  Bulk  for  Nominal  Value  o Law  declares  it  unlawful,  but  not  fraudulent  and  void  o However,   if   there  was  no  other  valuable  consideration,  

we   have   to   declare   it   void   for   lack   of   cause   or  consideration.  

 B.  On  Seller/Mortgagor/Assignor  

1. Criminal  Liability  • Violation   of   his   obligations   to   prepare   a   list   of   creditors   and  

apply  the  proceeds  of  the  sale  to  these  creditors  subjects  him  to  criminal  liability.    

• If  the  list  does  not  include  all  names  of  creditors,  or  with  wrong  amounts,  it  subjects  him  to  criminal  liability.  

• To   sell   the   stocks/goods/merchandise   for   no   consideration,   or  for   nominal   consideration   only,   subject   seller   to   criminal  liability.    

 2. No  Criminal  Liability  • Sworn   statement   should   be   registered   with   Department   of  

Trade  and  Industry.  o Noncompliance   with   this   does   not   affect   validity   nor  

does  it  subject  him  to  criminal  penalty.  • Failure   to   deliver   advance   notice   does   not   subject   him   to  

criminal  liability.      C.  On  Buyer/Mortgagee/Transferee  

• No  direct  obligation.  • It  can  be  said  that  no  criminal  liability  attaches  to  the  buyers  

o Some   argue   that   they   are   principals   by   indispensable  cooperation,  if  they  were  aware  of  the  intent/conspired  with  the  seller.  

• There   are   still   effects   though   since   sale   may   be   rendered  fraudulent  and  void.  Thus,  he  would  find  himself  not  entitled  to  the  things  he  paid  for.  

o He   may   also   be   sued   for   recovery   of   what   he   has  obtained.  

o He   may   also   be   liable   for   damages   for   having   helped  defraud  �creditors.