Quantitative wave function analysis for excited states of transition metalcomplexes

Sebastian Maia Felix Plassera Johann Dorna Maria Fumanalb Chantal Danielb Leticia Gonzaacutelezalowast

aInstitute of Theoretical Chemistry Faculty of Chemistry University of Vienna Waumlhringer Str 17 1090 Vienna Austria

bLaboratoire de Chimie Quantique Institut de Chimie Strasbourg UMR-7177 CNRSUniversiteacute de Strasbourg 1 Rue Blaise Pascal BP 296R8 Strasbourg67008 France

Abstract

The character of an electronically excited state is one of the most important descriptors employed to discussthe photophysics and photochemistry of transition metal complexes In transition metal complexes the interactionbetween the metal and the dierent ligands gives rise to a rich variety of excited states including metal-centeredintra-ligand metal-to-ligand charge transfer ligand-to-metal charge transfer and ligand-to-ligand charge transferstates Most often these excited states are identied by considering the most important wave function excitationcoecients and inspecting visually the involved orbitals This procedure is tedious subjective and imprecise Insteadautomatic and quantitative techniques for excited-state characterization are desirable In this contribution we reviewthe concept of charge transfer numbersmdashas implemented in the TheoDORE packagemdashand show its wide applicabilityto characterize the excited states of transition metal complexes Charge transfer numbers are a formal way toanalyze an excited state in terms of electron transitions between groups of atoms based only on the well-denedtransition density matrix Its advantages are many it can be fully automatized for many excited states is objectiveand reproducible and provides quantitative data useful for the discussion of trends or patterns We also introduce aformalism for spin-orbit-mixed states and a method for statistical analysis of charge transfer numbers The potentialof this technique is demonstrated for a number of prototypical transition metal complexes containing Ir Ru andRe Topics discussed include orbital delocalization between metal and carbonyl ligands nonradiative decay throughmetal-centered states eect of spin-orbit couplings on state character and comparison among results obtained fromdierent electronic structure methods

Keywords Excited states Wave function analysis Transition metal complexes Luminescent iridium complexesRuthenium tris-diimine complexes Rhenium carbonyl diimine complexes

lowastCorresponding authorEmail addresses sebastianmaiunivieacat (Sebastian Mai) felixplasserunivieacat (Felix Plasser) fumanalunistrafr (Maria

Fumanal) cdanielunistrafr (Chantal Daniel) leticiagonzalezunivieacat (Leticia Gonzaacutelez)

Acceptedmanuscript to httpsdoiorg101016 jccr201801019 copy2018 Thismanuscript version ismade available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 40 license

arX

iv1

711

1070

7v2

[ph

ysic

sch

em-p

h] 1

3 Fe

b 20

18

Contents

1 Introduction 2

2 Visual inspection of orbitals 4

3 Quantication of excited state localization and charge transfer 9

31 Charge transfer numbers 9

32 Charge transfer numbers for spin-mixed states 12

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers 15

4 Case studies 20

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3] 20

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] 22

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) 24

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) 27

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] 29

5 Concluding remarks 30

1 Introduction

Transition metal complexes (TMCs) are a very rich class of molecules with a vast array of possible applicationsOne very interesting aspect of TMCs is their collection of exceptional excited-state propertiesmdashie their spectroscopicphotophysical and photochemical properties Due to these properties various classes of TMCs are actively employedor show high potential for a large number of innovative technological applications [1] They are used in deviceswhich convert solar energy either directly to electrical current in dye-sensitized solar cells [2ndash5] to chemical energyof fuels in articial photosynthesis [6 7] or to complex chemicals in TMC-based photocatalysis [8ndash10] FurthermoreTMCs are useful in photodynamic therapy [11ndash13] where light activates therapeutically benecial chemical reactionsthat initiate apoptosis TMCs can also be used to produce light either for illumination or display purposes in organiclight-emitting diodes (OLEDs) [4 14ndash16] or for various kinds of luminescent probes in biochemical research [9 17ndash19] biological imaging [13 20] or sensoring [13] Moreover TMCs can also be used to modify light by means oftheir non-linear optical properties [4 21] or photoswitching abilities [22 23]

From a chemical point of view TMCs provide a highly exible toolbox by varying the central metal atom or theligand sphere the complexes can be functionalized in order to ne-tune properties and integrate them into dierentchemical or biological environments The specic interaction between the metal and the dierent ligands leads toseveral distinct ldquotextbookrdquo classes of excited states in TMCsmdashmetal-centered states (MC) intra-ligand states (IL)metal-to-ligand charge transfer states (MLCT) ligand-to-metal charge transfer states (LMCT) and ligand-to-ligandcharge transfer states (LLCT)mdashwhose properties and interplay are of central importance [24ndash28] Actually mostof the above-mentioned applications are based on achieving some favorable properties of particular excited states[16 29 30] For example redox photocatalysis exploits the fact that MLCT states can be both better electron acceptorsand electron donors than the ground state [9] TMC-based OLEDs rely on MLCT states which provide ultrafast

2

excited-state dynamicsmdashinternal conversion (IC) and intersystem crossing (ISC)mdashand a long life time of the lowestexcited state [15 16] On the other hand the population of MC states often leads to highly ecient nonradiativedecay to the ground state or to the dissociation of metal-ligand bonds [15 31 32] Which type of electronic statesare involved upon excitation is also relevant for sensoringimagingphotolabeling applications because states ofMLCT and LLCT character often show a high sensitivity to the environment leading eg to solvato- [33] orrigidochromism [34] Moreover in certain TMCs such as metal carbonyls the population of MLCT or MC statesaects the vibrational spectra such that these states can be conveniently probed with IR spectroscopy [35]

Due to the very large interest in the excited states of TMCs there is an eort to describe these states accuratelymostly in terms of their transition energies optical intensity and state character Theoretically two generalapproaches can be distinguished to this aim [16] Phenomenological or semi-empirical methodsmdashlike the ligand-eldtheory [36ndash38]mdashexcel at providing simple unied and qualitative models with signicant predictive power [16] Incontrast quantum chemistry based either on wave function approaches or density functional theory (DFT) allowsfor quantitative predictions related to individual compounds Nowadays quantum chemical computations can beconsidered the main work horse for the theoretical prediction of excited-state properties of TMCs However to boildown the large amount of computed data into simple and general statements is challenging because comprehensiveanalysis tools are not as developed as the quantum chemical methods themselves

That the accurate computational description of excited states of TMCs is a formidable challenge is evidenced bythe large amount of literature devoted to this topic see eg Refs [1 25ndash27 39ndash47] The dierent classes of excitedstates depend to a dierent extent on the description of electronic correlation and exchange eects necessitatinga well-balanced method Among the many electronic structure methods available two approaches are most oftenapplied to TMCs One are multi-congurationalmulti-reference methods [41 44 46] including complete activespace self-consistent eld (CASSCF) [48] CAS second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2) [49] as well as the relatedNEVPT2 [50] or MRPT2 [51] and multi-reference conguration interaction (MRCI) [52] The other avenue is toemploy DFT with its excited-state extension TD-DFT (time-dependent DFT) [53ndash56] which is the standard practicedue to its favorable balance between accuracy computational cost and usability [25 41 46] A detailed descriptionof these methods is beyond the scope of this work However regardless of the method chosen several computationalaspects are important to describe accurately TMCs [26] Foremost metal atoms induce strong relativistic eects dueto their large nuclear charge especially scalar relativistic eects and spin-orbit coupling (SOC) and those shouldbe included in the calculations [57 58] Additionally environment eects can be critical in obtaining results withpredictive power regarding experimental observables [59]

Once an accurate calculation of the excited states has been performed detailed insight into the excited-statecharacters is indispensable in order to tune TMCs for technological applications In TMCs such an analysis of theexcited-state wave functions is very demanding as often the excited states are represented as linear combinationsof dierent congurations composed of delocalized orbitals whose character is not well dened In this context itshould be remembered that these orbitals are simply a way to represent the many-electron wave function whereas itis ldquofallacious to conate the molecular orbitals with anything in the real worldrdquo [16] Moreover a given computedstate might be a non-trivial linear combination of the ldquotextbookrdquo classes of excited states [29] making assignmentdicult Also the comparison between excited-state properties computed using wave function methods and DFT isnot an easy task and encounters limitations as eg illustrated for third-row TMCs [58 60]

The factors above challenge the analysis of excited-state computations so that in many cases quantitative oreven qualitative insight from the computational results is dicult to obtain In this direction recent developmentshave been proposedmdashmostly focused on the DFT frameworkmdashfor rationalizing and interpreting charge transferexcited-states properties [61ndash69] These methods are very suitable for analyzing the strength of charge transfer oflow lying states in molecular systems with a clear donor-acceptor structure However in TMCs dierent parts of thesystem could act as donors or acceptors and thus it not enough to quantify the charge transfer character but also tospecify its direction ie to clearly discriminate between MLCT LMCT and LLCT states

With the goal to ameliorate this situation an automatic procedure to analyze wave functions as well as electrondensities has been recently designed providing a variety of visual and quantitative exploration methods for excited-state computations [70ndash74] This comprehensive toolbox has shown to be useful whenever a large number of excited

3

states is to be analyzed eg ensemble calculations of spectra trajectory simulations or higher excited states [75ndash78]Therefore it is expected to be particularly helpful in the case of TMCs where a high density of electronic excitedstates of various characters is present One additional advantage of these quantitative tools is that they eliminate therole of subjective reasoning in the discussions State characters are dened based on well-dened equations ratherthan on the individual subjective interpretation of a molecular orbital (MO) Quantitative tools can also reveal subtletrends such as ldquosubstitution at some position by a uorine atom increases the MLCT character of a state by 5rdquo Lastbut not least the application of sophisticated analysis tools has allowed identifying physical phenomena such asexcitonic correlation [79 80] and secondary orbital relaxation [81] which could otherwise not be understood evenqualitatively in the canonical MO picture

These wave function analysis tools are implemented in the TheoDORE package [82] which provides interfacesto a wide range of quantum chemistry programs and electronic structure methods As part of this work we report anew interface between the TheoDORE and ADF [83] program packages that allows for a quantitative analysis oflarge-scale TD-DFT computations and also provides the possibility of analyzing spin-orbit coupled states In additionwe use integrated analysis utilities in the Q-Chem [71 84] and Molcas [85 86] program packages in connection withwave function-based single- and multi-reference methods where appropriate

The goal of this review is to present a variety of powerful ways in which wave function analysis can be appliedto TMC excited-state computations First we shall introduce several orbital transformation techniques which can beused to represent excitations (Section 2) By means of descriptors like single-excitation contribution charge transfernumbers or entanglement measures we move away from orbital visualization to a purely numeric representation ofthe excitations and we show how these descriptors can be used to compactly depict large number of excited states(Section 31 and 32) We also show that a statistical analysis of the numeric descriptors can lead to further insightwhich is otherwise not attainable by simple inspection of the wave functions (Section 33)

The applicability of these tools will be demonstrated in a series of calculations on prototypical TMCs containingIr(III) Ru(II) and Re(I) centers (Section 4) Five case studies will illustrate the potential of quantitative analysistechniques at deciphering the excited state characters in dierent situations such as (i) How are the excited-statecharacters aected by nuclear relaxation (ii) How does SOC change the mixing ratios between the dierent classesof excited states (iii) How are the excited-state characters inuence by the ligand substitution (iv) How can theinteraction of the metal center and the ligands be quantied (v) And nally how does the electronic structuremethod aect the electronic excited states and how can one easily compare a multitude of electronic states computedat diering levels of theory

2 Visual inspection of orbitals

For pedagogical purposes we begin reviewing qualitative procedures to analyze electronic wave functionsWithout any doubt the most common way to do so is by inspecting visually the involved orbitals Despite this beingan intuitive procedure it should be remembered that the orbitals are only mathematical objects without a directphysical meaning [16] As a consequence there is not one ldquotruerdquo set of orbitals but a number of dierent visualizationtechniques that can be applied leading to dierent sets of orbitals Depending on the visualization technique chosenthe orbital shapes and thus the apparent state characters can be quite dierent Hence we commence this section byintroducing the dierent techniques available to carry out a qualitative wave function analysis based on the visualinspection of MOs The goal could be formulated as identifying the ldquotextbookrdquo state character of a given electronicexcited state For this purpose we shall focus on linear-response (LR) TD-DFT but most of the techniques describedin this and the following sections can be applied to states computed with other electronic structure methods as well

In TD-DFT one considers the response of the electronic density of some molecule to a small time-dependentperturbation [53ndash55] The excitation energies EI ie the energy of the excited state relative to the ground state canthen be obtained by nding frequencies of the time-dependent perturbation where the density response functionhas a pole By considering only the linear density response it is then possible to nd a non-Hermitian eigenvalue

4

problem whose solutions are the poles of the response function This eigenvalue problem can be written as(A BB A

) (XI

YI

)= EI

(1 00 minus1

) (XI

YI

) (1)

Here the matrices A and B are called orbital rotation Hessians [87] and depend on orbital energy dierences andintegrals over the two-electron Coulomb and exchange operators Once a solution to (1) has been found in additionto the excitation energy EI one also obtains the response vector (XI YI ) This vector is similar to the CI vectorfrom a conguration interaction or multi-reference calculation The vector XI corresponds to excitations fromoccupied to virtual orbitals eg vector element X I

ia is the coecient corresponding to an excitation from an occupiedorbital i to a virtual orbital a The vector YI corresponds to ldquode-excitationsrdquo from virtual into occupied orbitalsThese de-excitations which follow from the derivation of LR TD-DFT equations do not possess a clear physicalmeaning [40] and are usually dismissed in the discussions Ignoring the de-excitations in equation (1) is known asthe Tamm-Damco approximation (TDA) [88]

AXI = EIXI (2)

The TDA is often applied in TD-DFT for computational eciency reasons as it replaces a non-Hermitian eigenvalueproblem by a Hermitian eigenvalue problem of half the size Even more it has been pointed out that the TDAsometimes leads to improved results by avoiding triplet instabilities for range-separated hybrid functionals [89] Forthese reasons we will restrict ourselves to the TDA in the following More information regarding wave functionanalysis for full TD-DFT can be found in Ref [90] and regarding mathematical considerations relevant to de-excitationsin Ref [91]

One of the complexes considered in this tutorial is [Ir(ppy)3] (ppy=2-phenylpyridyl) which is a strongly phospho-rescent compound used in OLED design [92] (for a more comprehensive introduction of this complex see Section 41)Its frontier orbitals ie the ones mainly involved in the low-lying excitations are depicted in Figure 1 The threehighest occupied orbitals (Ha He1 He2) are combinations of metal 5d orbitals and ligand π orbitals whereas the threelowest unoccupied orbitals (La Le1 Le2) are linear combinations of ligand π lowast orbitals with little metal contributionsThese frontier orbitals are characteristic for many pseudo-octahedral complexes with D3 or C3 symmetry [16] Notehowever that although our calculations used a symmetric geometry the calculations were performed withoutsymmetrymdashas is practiced often

In order to perform an analysis of the computed excited state the excitation vector XI is needed Most commonlythe excited states are analyzed by identifying the largest contributions X I

ia to the excitation vector By manualinspection the orbitals i and a are then assigned to some orbital classmdasheg metal-centered or ligand centered Thenif i is a metal-centered orbital and a is a ligand-centered orbital the electronic state is characterized as an MLCTstate In Table 1 we compile the excitation energies symmetries and leading excitations for the rst six triplet statesof [Ir(ppy)3] As can be seen the lowest six triplet states are very close in energy (within 03 eV) and due to thesymmetry of the molecule are grouped into (near-)degenerate sets of states The states T4 to T6 are actually so closein energy that it is not possible to identify which is the A state and which are the E states and are thus labeled as alinear combination of both Table 1 lists all the contributions with a weight |X I

ia |2 of at least 015 These contributionsrepresent at least 58 of each of the shown states and it is thus possible to provide a qualitative state assignmentbased on this table Because the occupied orbitals are mixed metal-ligand-centered and the virtual orbitals are mostlyligand-centered it can be said that the six triplet states all have mixed MLCT IL and LLCT character

Beyond this basic qualitative nding it is hard to gain further knowledge from the coecients in Table 1 It isdicult to discern any dierences between these six states as they are complicated linear combinations of dierentexcitations Moreover it is very hard to answer questions like ldquoAre the ligand-centered contributions combinationsof local excitations (IL) or charge transfer (LLCT) excitationsrdquo It is also not clear from Table 1 whether the statesshown are actually multi-congurational states or whether an orbital representation could be found where a singleconguration is sucient to describe one of the states

One of the basic problems of the above analysis is that when expressed in the basis of the canonical Kohn-Shamorbitals the excited states are often linear combinations of many dierent excitations with similar weightsmdashas

5

E

Ha

He1 He2

La

Le1 Le2

EA

AE

ndash575 eVndash560 eV

ndash175 eVndash162 eV

Figure 1 Depiction of the frontier canonical orbitals for [Ir(ppy)3] The gure also denes the orbital labels Ha He1 He2 for the highest occupiedorbitals and La Le1 Le2 for the lowest unoccupied orbitals (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water) see Appendix A for full computationaldetails)

Table 1 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and leading excitations with coecients Xia for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym Leading excitationsT1 289 A +085HaLa +032He1Le2 +032He2Le1T2 293 E +058HaLe1 +049HaLe2T3 293 E +058HaLe2 minus049HaLe1T4 317 A+E +048He1Le1 +044He2Le1 +041He1LaT5 317 A+E +056He2La +046He2Le2 minus042He2Le1T6 317 A+E minus056He1La +053He1Le2 +045HaLe2

exemplied in Table 1 In such a case the actual state character is determined by the (non-trivial) interferencepatterns between the excitations as visible by the dierent signs of the coecients in the table In order to simplifythe interpretation it is advantageous to seek an orbital representation which is more suitable to express the excitedstates in a simple and compact form Ideally this representation should also be method independent because thereare subtle dierences in the interpretation of eg canonical Kohn-Sham orbitals versus Hartree-Fock or CASSCForbitals and between the response vector from TD-DFT versus the conguration interaction vectors from wavefunction-based methods [40 93]

To this end in the following we will heavily use the one-electron transition density matrix (1TDM) TI J whoseelements in general can be dened as [71]

T I Jr s =

langΨI

adaggerr as ΨJ rang (3)

Here adaggerr is the creation operator for orbital ϕr as the annihilation operator for orbital ϕs and I and J are twoexcited state indices We will mostly consider transition density matrices between the ground state and an excited

6

state I which we write as TI Such a 1TDM is closely related to physical observables like the transition dipolemoment [71] showing that the 1TDM is a suitable basis for a more physically meaningful analysis of excited-statecharacter For methods which allow describing higher excitations (multi-reference quadratic response etc) therewill also be two-electron and higher transition density matrices but these contribute only little for states which arepredominantly described as single-excitations

In TD-DFT which employs a single-determinant ground state the 1TDM TI is directly related to the responsevector Within the TDA the following assignment is made

T Iia = X I

ia (4)

where i runs over the occupied orbitals and a over the virtual ones

With the 1TDM dened we can now introduce the concept of natural transition orbitals (NTOs) [70 94 95]These are obtained by a singular value decomposition of the 1TDM

TI = VIcopyshyshylaquoλI1

λI2

ordfregregnotWIdagger (5)

Analogously it can be stated that the unitary matrices VI and WI contain the eigenvectors of the hole and particledensity matrices (TITIdagger and TIdaggerTI respectively) [71] From the matrix VI one can construct the NTOs of the excitationhole by summing over the appropriate occupied orbitals

ψ h Ip (r) =

sumi isinocc

V Iipϕi (r) (6)

and from the matrix WI the NTOs of the excited electron by summing over the virtual orbitals

ψ e Ip (r) =

sumaisinvirt

W Iapϕa(r) (7)

The value (λIp )2 then gives the weight of the excitationψ h Ip rarr ψ e I

p in the excited state I The strength of the NTOtransformation is that usually only a few (λIp )2 are signicantly larger than zero and by considering only those fewexcitations a very compact representation for the excited state can be obtained The number of signicant NTOscontributing to a given state can be quantied by the NTO participation ratio (PR) [70]

PRINTO =

(sump (λIp )2

)2sump (λIp )4

(8)

which is a measure of how many single-particle excitations are necessary to describe a state and thus its multi-congurational character This value is always greater or equal to one PRNTO has an important practical implicationie it shows how many orbitals should be visualized More importantly the number of non-vanishing NTOamplitudes have a clear physical meaning that can be interpreted in the context of static electron correlation [96]exciton formation [70 97] and entanglement between the electron and hole quasiparticles [98] The PRNTO value hasbeen applied practically to quantify charge resonance interactions during excimer formation of organic molecules[70 99] and to understand the intermediate states involved in two-photon absorption [100]

In Figure 2 we plot the most important NTOs for the six triplet states discussed above The NTOs represent theexcitations more compactly than the canonical orbitals did as can be seen from the sums of weights Indeed for allstates the shown NTOs represent at least 90 which is much better than the 58 represented in Table 1 Whereaseach individual state can be represented with few NTO pairs it is now necessary to plot (generally dierent) NTOsfor each state so that a large number of NTOs will be needed to represent a large set of excited states

7

074 012 012

T1 289 eV (173)

067 031

T2 293 eV (182)

070 020

T3 293 eV (181)

094

T4 317 eV (111)

091

T5 317 eV (117)

093

T6 317 eV (113)

Figure 2 Depiction of the leading NTO pairs for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] with the weights of the NTO pairs given above the arrowsThe labels under each set of NTOs indicates the shown state the excitation energy and the PRNTO in parenthesis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

The analysis of the NTOs in Figure 2 allows obtaining qualitative insight into the state characters beyond theinsight gained from Table 1 First PRNTO allows judging the multi-congurational character of the states showingthat the rst three triplets are indeed multi-congurationalmdashas could be anticipated above On the contrary T4T5 and T6 are identied as virtually single-congurational statesmdasha fact that could hardly be expected from thecanonical orbital representation Moreover in the NTO basis we can qualitatively distinguish between IL and LLCTtransitions T1T2 andT3 seem to mostly involve local IL excitations besides the MLCT character This is unexpectedsince in the canonical representation T2 and T3 were mixtures of excitations from the Ha orbital which is fullydelocalized The higher triplets constitute a set of LLCT statesmdashagain with some MLCT admixturemdashwhere theelectron is excited counterclockwise (in the used orientation and for the employed enantiomer of [Ir(ppy)3]) fromone ligand to another one Hence the six triplet states can be described as a set of three MLCTIL states and threehigher-energy LLCTMLCT states

On a side note T4 T5 and T6 do not reect the proper symmetry of the molecule because our calculation did notconsider explicit symmetry This symmetry breaking can be explained by the fact that the three states are nearlydegenerate and therefore can mix Now apparently the computation converged to three states where the excitationsare clearly localized Oppositely one can expect that the properly symmetrized states would be more delocalizedforming one A state which is a positive linear combination of the three states and a pair of E states Neverthelessthese symmetrized states would still retain their counterclockwise CT characters even though this might not beimmediately visible in the NTO representation of the symmetrized states This discussion shows that in this complexthe states have a tendency to easily break symmetry

Whereas the NTOs contain the full information of the initial TDA computation there are also ways to reducethis information and represent the excitation in an even more compact way A weighted sum of the electron and holeNTOs leads to the electron and hole densities [71]

ρIh(r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ h Ip (r)

)2(9)

ρIe (r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ e Ip (r)

)2(10)

also termed (unrelaxed) attachment and detachment densities [101] The dierence between these two leads to the

8

unrelaxed dierence densityρIdi (r) = ρIh(r) minus ρIe (r) (11)

while the sumρIspin(r) = ρIh(r) + ρIe (r) (12)

corresponds to the spin-density in a high-spin triplet computation

If one goes beyond the TDA eg with full TD-DFT wave function based methods or by including orbitalrelaxations as present in the theory of analytical energy gradients [102] these simple rules connecting the NTOswith the dierence and spin densities no longer apply and a wealth of new information can be extracted from thedeviations of these quantities provided suitable analysis methods are chosen [71] In particular a comparison of theNTOs with the eigenvectors of the relaxed dierence density matrixmdashtermed natural dierence orbitalsmdashproved to bevery useful for analyzing secondary orbital relaxation eects accompanying the main excitation process [103] It wasshown that these eects were particularly pronounced for the MLCT states of a small model iridium complex wherethe occupied d-orbitals contracted after one electron was removed [81]

3 Quantication of excited state localization and charge transfer

In the following section we show how it is possible to identify state characters based on the computation ofdescriptors while avoiding entirely the visual inspection of orbitals As alluded to in the introduction a numericalcharacterization of excited states promises several advantages it allows avoiding laborious manual work and can beautomatized for a large number of excited states it is objective reproducible and more precise it allows spottingsmall dierences trends or continuous changes and nally can reveal physics which cannot be represented throughorbital pictures

One such descriptor the PRNTO value of equation (8) was already introduced above In the following we willintroduce another kind of descriptor the charge transfer number [70 104] which will be our main tool for theremainder of the text The following subsections will rst generally outline the underlying theory and show examplesfor the most common case of non-relativistic (or scalar relativistic) wave functions Subsequently we will presentthe rst application of the same methodology to spin-orbit coupled relativistic states Finally motivated by the factthat in certain situations the dierent computed charge transfer numbers are strongly correlated we present a novelclustering ansatz which allows automatically dividing a molecule into chromophoric subunits

31 Charge transfer numbers

Excited states are usually discussed in terms of where the excitation originatesmdashie where the excitation hole islocalizedmdashand where it goes tomdashie where the excited electron is localized For example the excitation in an MLCTstate originates at a metal orbital and goes to one or more ligands an IL state originates at a ligand and goes to adierent orbital at the same ligand The purpose of the charge transfer numbers is to formalize this concept Againthe 1TDM TI is considered as the central object but instead of visualizing it we partition it among dierent fragmentsof the molecular system under study Mathematically speaking the fragments are mutually disjoint subsets of theatoms of the molecule Usually the fragments are dened by chemical intuition eg each ligand of a complex istreated as a separate fragment but later on we will also discuss strategies for automatic fragmentation

The rst step is a transformation of the 1TDM from the MO basis to the atomic orbital (AO) basis

TI = CTICT (13)

where C is the MO-coecient matrix The square of an element of this matrix (T Imicroν )2 measures the contribution

of an excitation originating on the atomic orbital (AO) χmicro and going to the AO χν The charge transfer numberΩIAB is now intended to measure the total contributions of excitations that originate at any AO centered on an atom

of fragment A and go to any AO on fragment B In a naive implementation one could simply sum over all (T Imicroν )2

9

elements where micro lies on A and ν lies on B However for a rigorous computation it is necessary to apply a populationanalysis scheme that takes into account the non-orthogonality of the AOs There is no unique way of dividing thedensity among atoms and a number of dierent population analysis schemes have been devised [105] Two suchanalysis schemes were adapted for analyzing the 1TDM [71 106] and implemented in TheoDORE First it is possible[71] to partition the 1TDM in the spirit of a Mulliken analysis

ΩIAB =

12

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

[(TI S)microν (STI )microν + T I

microν (STI S)microν] (14)

where S is the AO overlap matrix yielding an equation that is related to Mayerrsquos bond order [107] Alternatively aLoumlwdin orthogonalization can be applied to TI [106] leading to the orthogonal matrix

TI = S12TI S12 (15)

which can be directly used for summation

ΩIAB =

summicro isinA

sumν isinB(T Imicroν )2 (16)

In the implementation used here the Loumlwdin orthogonalization proceeds by using the following identity

TI = S12TI S12 = (PQT)TI (PQT)T (17)

where P and Q are the matrices containing the left and right singular vectors of the MO-coecient matrix C It isthus possible to evaluate Equation (16) without knowledge of the AO overlap matrix S and a similar consideration[70] also applies for Equation (14) Whereas Equation (14) was initially implemented in TheoDORE it is advisable torather apply the Loumlwdin style partitioning of Equation (16) since it is computationally more ecient and in mostcases numerically more stable (ie the ΩI

AB values are strictly positive which is not necessarily the case for theMulliken partitioning) It is in principle possible to extend this formalism to other more involved population analysisschemes but this has not been attempted yet

Finally the quantityΩI =

sumAB

ΩIAB =

sumr s

(T Ir s )2 =

sump

(λIp )2 (18)

which is equivalent to the Frobenius norm of T (or T) can be dened [71 108] In the case of a normalized CISor TDA wave function this value is always equal to 1 whereas it is generally less than 1 for correlated ab initiomethods [103 109] In the latter case the ΩI value can be applied as a method-independent measure for the single-excitation character where ΩI = 1 corresponds to a pure singly excited state and smaller values indicate contributionsfrom double or higher excitations The physical meaning of ΩI is that it allows making some statements abouttransition properties of one-electron operators [108] Specically from ΩI = 0 it follows that 〈Ψ0 |O (1) |ΨI 〉 = 0 forany possible one-electron operator O (1) for example the dipole moment operator or a spin-orbit operator in a meaneld approximation

For a system of nfrag fragments the charge transfer number analysis produces an nfrag times nfrag matrix with allthe possible contributions Here the diagonal elements ΩI

AA correspond to local excitations on fragment A whileΩIAB A B are charge transfer contributions The matrix elements ΩI

AB can be directly plotted in the form of atwo-dimensional matrix plot (sometimes called electron-hole pair correlation plot) as has been discussed for examplein Refs [79 110ndash112]

Such matrix plots are shown in Figure 3 for the T1 minusT6 states of [Ir(ppy)3] denoting the three ppy ligands asL1 L2 and L3 Starting with the T1 state (Figure 3a) it is observed that the three strongest contributions (16 each)are situated on the diagonal corresponding to local excitations on each of the three ligands In addition threecontributions (13 each) are seen corresponding to IrrarrL excitations The same types of transitions are also presentfor theT2 andT3 (Figure 3b-c) states with the exception that the symmetry is broken and the ligands do not contribute

10

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

1 13 13 13

0 16 2 2

0 2 16 2

0 2 2 16

(a) T1 (289 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 19 1 16

1 29 0 2

0 2 0 2

1 2 0 24

(b) T2 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 5 23 8

0 7 2 1

1 1 35 1

1 1 3 11

(c) T3 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3Ir

L1L2

L32 1 2 46

1 0 1 22

0 0 1 7

1 0 0 15

(d) T4 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 3 45 2

0 1 6 0

1 1 14 1

1 1 22 0

(e) T5 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 46 3 1

0 14 1 1

1 22 1 1

0 7 1 0

(f) T6 (317 eV)

Figure 3 Matrix plots of the charge transfer numbers for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] In the plots the magnitude of the elements of the4 times 4 matrices are given by the color the numbers give the numerical value (in ) The labels L1 L2 and L3 denote the three ppy ligands Theexcitation hole is plotted on the vertical axis the excited electron on the horizontal axis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

equally to these states The states T4 to T6 (Figures 3d-f) show distinctly dierent plots as opposed to the rst threestates In these cases only one column of the matrix shows signicant contributions meaning that the excited electronis localized on one of the ligands The excitation hole always has its strongest contribution on Ir (46) the secondcontribution (22) is of LLCT type (Li rarrLj i j) and only the third contribution (14ndash15) is of IL type (Li rarrLi )

While the plots shown in Figure 3 provide a compact and rigorous representation of the excitations it is oftenconvenient to further compress the information For this purpose for each state partial sums are computed over allthe contributions that correspond to one of the ve classes of TMC excited states MC MLCT LMCT IL and LLCTHere the IrrarrIr matrix element gives the MC contribution to the state the sum of the IrrarrLi elements gives theMLCT contribution and so on This generic partitioning of the charge transfer number matrix is shown in Figure 4It can be applied to homoleptic complexes or more generally to TMCs where all ligands are treated as equivalentInstead of plotting the whole matrix of ΩI

AB it is now possible to identify one or two dominant contributions andrepresent them in tabular form Naturally the downside of this compression is that some information is lostmdashin thiscase the information about excitation localization on the individual ligands Hence one should carefully decide onthe degree of data compression depending on the application

For the six triplets of [Ir(ppy)3] the results of this analysis are shown in Table 2 It can be readily seen that thesix states form two strongly related sets of states T1 T2 and T3 have almost identical state character contributionsand the three other states likewise Furthermore it can be argued that the obtained numeric values provide moreinsight than that gained above from the NTOs Accordingly it can be seen that the three lowest-lying triplet statesare predominantly ligand-centered with around 50 IL character and only around 35 MLCT In contrast the higherstates are of predominant MLCT (50) character and possess LLCT character as a secondary contribution (31)

The information contained in the table can also be depicted in compact form as shown in Figure 5 where theenergy is depicted with horizontal bars the main state character is indicated by the color of these horizontal barsand the contributions to the state character are shown in stacked bar plots The advantage of this gure is that it canbe easily scaled to a relatively large number of states by simply making the bars narrower For instance 30ndash50 statescan be depicted in a gure of similar size (as will be shown below) while a table conveying the same information for50 states would probably take more than half a page Moreover spotting trends or patterns within the table would bemuch more cumbersome than glancing at the colors of the gure

11

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

HolePo

sition

Electron Position

MC MLCT

LMCT(Ph)3

rarr(Ph)3

IL

IL

IL

LLCT

LLCT

Figure 4 Division of the charge transfer matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states

Table 2 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and most important state character contributions for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym State characterT1 289 A 49 IL 38 MLCTT2 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT3 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT4 317 A+E 49 MLCT 31 LLCTT5 317 A+E 50 MLCT 31 LLCTT6 317 A+E 50 MLCT 32 LLCT

In summary the presented protocol enables a completely automatized quantitative and reproducible assignmentof state characters in TMCs In Sections 41 to 45 we will show that the methodology can be applied benecially incases where a larger number of states are to be analyzed where detailed understanding of ligand eects is needed orto rationalize the eects of geometric modications

32 Charge transfer numbers for spin-mixed states

In TMCs SOC is very relevant due to the large nuclear charge of the metal atom SOC is often included in theelectronic Hamiltonian as a perturbation [41 113ndash116]

H el = HMCH + H SOC (19)

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6020406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

) LLCTILLMCTMLCTMC

29303132

E(e

V)

Figure 5 Decomposition of the charge transfer number matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

12

where HMCH is the molecular Coulomb Hamiltonian (MCH) [117] which contains the (scalar relativistic) kinetic energyand Coulomb potential energies of the electrons In practice one usually rst computes a number of eigenstatesof the MCH (ΨMCH also called spin-free states) eg singlets and triplets and subsequently evaluates the SOCmatrix elements within this set of states The spin-orbit-coupled states (or diagonal states) can then be obtained ina perturbative fashion by a diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix where the diagonal elements contain theenergies of the MCH states and the o-diagonal elements are the SOCs The approximation of this step is neglectingthe SOC matrix elements with all higher states not computed in the rst step The diagonalization of HMCHmdashwithelements HMCH

I J = 〈ΨMCHI |H el |ΨMCH

J 〉mdashcan be written as

Hdiag = UdaggerHMCHU (20)

where U is the eigenvector matrix of HMCH The matrix U allows reconstructing the wave function of the diagonalstate in terms of the MCH states

|Ψdiagα 〉 =

sumI

|ΨMCHI 〉UIα (21)

Assuming that the ground state Ψ0 is not aected by this transformation which is often a good approximation the1TDM between the ground state and an excited diagonal state is given by

T αr s =langΨ0

adaggerr as Ψdiagα

rang (22)

which after insertion of Equation (21) reads

T αr s =sumI

langΨ0

adaggerr as ΨMCHI

rangUIα =

sumI

T Ir sUIα (23)

Insertion into Equation (17) shows that the same relations also holds for the orthogonalized matrices ie

T αr s =sumI

T Ir sUIα (24)

and Equation (16) nally leads to

ΩαAB =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ α

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

T ImicroνT

Jmicroν =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ αΩIminusJAB (25)

Here the diagonal elements ΩIminusIAB are equivalent to the charge transfer numbers ΩI

AB of the MCH states as denedabove and the o-diagonal ΩIminusJ

AB terms are computed in an analogous fashion using the 1TDMs of two dierentstates Importantly the evaluation of Equation (25) does not require any signicant additional computational eortwhen compared to the MCH case since all required TI matrices are already available This transformation has beennewly implemented into TheoDORE in the course of this work and we will illustrate its potential below

In order to visualize the resulting data we rst consider a plot of the energies versus oscillator strengths Figure 6shows these two quantities for the lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] The spin-pure (singlet and triplet) states in theMCH representation are denoted by open rings and the spin-mixed states in the diagonal representation by lledcircles As the diagonal states do not have a well-dened total spin value we indicate the total spin expectation valueof these states by color Additionally we draw arrows between the MCH and diagonal states in such a way that it canbe discerned which MCH states contribute to which diagonal states In that way the plot can be used to analyze theelectronic structure of the diagonal states in a visual way At rst glance the complexity of the diagonal states can beappreciated ie in most cases the diagonal states are a linear combination of a large number of dierent MCH states

The reason to show energies versus oscillator strengths is that for [Ir(ppy)3] and related complexes the characterof the lowest diagonal triplet states (the sublevels of theT1) is decisive for its phosphorescence properties Ideally thelowest triplet sublevel should have signicant oscillator strength in order to facilitate fast and ecient phosphorescentdecay It has been shown by theoretical arguments [16 118] that for pseudo-octahedral complexes of trigonal

13

T1T23 T4minus6

S1

S23

X1

28 30 32 34 36

000

001

002

Energy (eV)

Osc

illat

orst

reng

th

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3

〈S2〉

Figure 6 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and oscillator strengths of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] in theMCH representation (open rings) and in the diagonal representation (lled circles) For each state the color indicates the spin multiplicitymdashredor blue for the spin-pure MCH states or any intermediate color for the spin-mixed diagonal states The arrows indicate which MCH statescontribute to which diagonal states with the arrow thickness indicating the weight of the contributions X1 denotes the lowest diagonal state(TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

T1

T23

T4minus6

S1 S2

X1

28 30 32 34 3610

20

30

40

50

60

Energy (eV)

MLC

Tch

arac

ter

()

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3〈S

2〉

Figure 7 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and MLCT character of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] Themeaning of the colors and arrows is the same as in Figure 6 (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

symmetry the lowest triplet sublevel is forbidden from decaying radiatively while the higher sublevels are allowedto phosphoresce This result is recovered in our calculations as can be seen in Figure 6 where the lowest diagonalstate (labeled ldquoX1rdquo) has an oscillator strength of zero The plot also shows that some of the other sublevels of T1T2 and T3 indeed acquire small oscillator strengths Figure 6 also reveals that the intensity of these states does notoriginate from the lowest singlet states S1 minus S3 as one might have assumed initially but it actually derives from therelatively bright S4 and S5 state pair (not shown due to scale) A possible explanation for this nding is given bythe general properties of the spin-orbit operator which govern the magnitude of the SOCs [114] Accordingly ina TMC one can expect very large SOCs between a singlet I and a triplet J if the transition I rarr J is a one-electron

14

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

excited-state dynamicsmdashinternal conversion (IC) and intersystem crossing (ISC)mdashand a long life time of the lowestexcited state [15 16] On the other hand the population of MC states often leads to highly ecient nonradiativedecay to the ground state or to the dissociation of metal-ligand bonds [15 31 32] Which type of electronic statesare involved upon excitation is also relevant for sensoringimagingphotolabeling applications because states ofMLCT and LLCT character often show a high sensitivity to the environment leading eg to solvato- [33] orrigidochromism [34] Moreover in certain TMCs such as metal carbonyls the population of MLCT or MC statesaects the vibrational spectra such that these states can be conveniently probed with IR spectroscopy [35]

Due to the very large interest in the excited states of TMCs there is an eort to describe these states accuratelymostly in terms of their transition energies optical intensity and state character Theoretically two generalapproaches can be distinguished to this aim [16] Phenomenological or semi-empirical methodsmdashlike the ligand-eldtheory [36ndash38]mdashexcel at providing simple unied and qualitative models with signicant predictive power [16] Incontrast quantum chemistry based either on wave function approaches or density functional theory (DFT) allowsfor quantitative predictions related to individual compounds Nowadays quantum chemical computations can beconsidered the main work horse for the theoretical prediction of excited-state properties of TMCs However to boildown the large amount of computed data into simple and general statements is challenging because comprehensiveanalysis tools are not as developed as the quantum chemical methods themselves

That the accurate computational description of excited states of TMCs is a formidable challenge is evidenced bythe large amount of literature devoted to this topic see eg Refs [1 25ndash27 39ndash47] The dierent classes of excitedstates depend to a dierent extent on the description of electronic correlation and exchange eects necessitatinga well-balanced method Among the many electronic structure methods available two approaches are most oftenapplied to TMCs One are multi-congurationalmulti-reference methods [41 44 46] including complete activespace self-consistent eld (CASSCF) [48] CAS second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2) [49] as well as the relatedNEVPT2 [50] or MRPT2 [51] and multi-reference conguration interaction (MRCI) [52] The other avenue is toemploy DFT with its excited-state extension TD-DFT (time-dependent DFT) [53ndash56] which is the standard practicedue to its favorable balance between accuracy computational cost and usability [25 41 46] A detailed descriptionof these methods is beyond the scope of this work However regardless of the method chosen several computationalaspects are important to describe accurately TMCs [26] Foremost metal atoms induce strong relativistic eects dueto their large nuclear charge especially scalar relativistic eects and spin-orbit coupling (SOC) and those shouldbe included in the calculations [57 58] Additionally environment eects can be critical in obtaining results withpredictive power regarding experimental observables [59]

Once an accurate calculation of the excited states has been performed detailed insight into the excited-statecharacters is indispensable in order to tune TMCs for technological applications In TMCs such an analysis of theexcited-state wave functions is very demanding as often the excited states are represented as linear combinationsof dierent congurations composed of delocalized orbitals whose character is not well dened In this context itshould be remembered that these orbitals are simply a way to represent the many-electron wave function whereas itis ldquofallacious to conate the molecular orbitals with anything in the real worldrdquo [16] Moreover a given computedstate might be a non-trivial linear combination of the ldquotextbookrdquo classes of excited states [29] making assignmentdicult Also the comparison between excited-state properties computed using wave function methods and DFT isnot an easy task and encounters limitations as eg illustrated for third-row TMCs [58 60]

The factors above challenge the analysis of excited-state computations so that in many cases quantitative oreven qualitative insight from the computational results is dicult to obtain In this direction recent developmentshave been proposedmdashmostly focused on the DFT frameworkmdashfor rationalizing and interpreting charge transferexcited-states properties [61ndash69] These methods are very suitable for analyzing the strength of charge transfer oflow lying states in molecular systems with a clear donor-acceptor structure However in TMCs dierent parts of thesystem could act as donors or acceptors and thus it not enough to quantify the charge transfer character but also tospecify its direction ie to clearly discriminate between MLCT LMCT and LLCT states

With the goal to ameliorate this situation an automatic procedure to analyze wave functions as well as electrondensities has been recently designed providing a variety of visual and quantitative exploration methods for excited-state computations [70ndash74] This comprehensive toolbox has shown to be useful whenever a large number of excited

3

states is to be analyzed eg ensemble calculations of spectra trajectory simulations or higher excited states [75ndash78]Therefore it is expected to be particularly helpful in the case of TMCs where a high density of electronic excitedstates of various characters is present One additional advantage of these quantitative tools is that they eliminate therole of subjective reasoning in the discussions State characters are dened based on well-dened equations ratherthan on the individual subjective interpretation of a molecular orbital (MO) Quantitative tools can also reveal subtletrends such as ldquosubstitution at some position by a uorine atom increases the MLCT character of a state by 5rdquo Lastbut not least the application of sophisticated analysis tools has allowed identifying physical phenomena such asexcitonic correlation [79 80] and secondary orbital relaxation [81] which could otherwise not be understood evenqualitatively in the canonical MO picture

These wave function analysis tools are implemented in the TheoDORE package [82] which provides interfacesto a wide range of quantum chemistry programs and electronic structure methods As part of this work we report anew interface between the TheoDORE and ADF [83] program packages that allows for a quantitative analysis oflarge-scale TD-DFT computations and also provides the possibility of analyzing spin-orbit coupled states In additionwe use integrated analysis utilities in the Q-Chem [71 84] and Molcas [85 86] program packages in connection withwave function-based single- and multi-reference methods where appropriate

The goal of this review is to present a variety of powerful ways in which wave function analysis can be appliedto TMC excited-state computations First we shall introduce several orbital transformation techniques which can beused to represent excitations (Section 2) By means of descriptors like single-excitation contribution charge transfernumbers or entanglement measures we move away from orbital visualization to a purely numeric representation ofthe excitations and we show how these descriptors can be used to compactly depict large number of excited states(Section 31 and 32) We also show that a statistical analysis of the numeric descriptors can lead to further insightwhich is otherwise not attainable by simple inspection of the wave functions (Section 33)

The applicability of these tools will be demonstrated in a series of calculations on prototypical TMCs containingIr(III) Ru(II) and Re(I) centers (Section 4) Five case studies will illustrate the potential of quantitative analysistechniques at deciphering the excited state characters in dierent situations such as (i) How are the excited-statecharacters aected by nuclear relaxation (ii) How does SOC change the mixing ratios between the dierent classesof excited states (iii) How are the excited-state characters inuence by the ligand substitution (iv) How can theinteraction of the metal center and the ligands be quantied (v) And nally how does the electronic structuremethod aect the electronic excited states and how can one easily compare a multitude of electronic states computedat diering levels of theory

2 Visual inspection of orbitals

For pedagogical purposes we begin reviewing qualitative procedures to analyze electronic wave functionsWithout any doubt the most common way to do so is by inspecting visually the involved orbitals Despite this beingan intuitive procedure it should be remembered that the orbitals are only mathematical objects without a directphysical meaning [16] As a consequence there is not one ldquotruerdquo set of orbitals but a number of dierent visualizationtechniques that can be applied leading to dierent sets of orbitals Depending on the visualization technique chosenthe orbital shapes and thus the apparent state characters can be quite dierent Hence we commence this section byintroducing the dierent techniques available to carry out a qualitative wave function analysis based on the visualinspection of MOs The goal could be formulated as identifying the ldquotextbookrdquo state character of a given electronicexcited state For this purpose we shall focus on linear-response (LR) TD-DFT but most of the techniques describedin this and the following sections can be applied to states computed with other electronic structure methods as well

In TD-DFT one considers the response of the electronic density of some molecule to a small time-dependentperturbation [53ndash55] The excitation energies EI ie the energy of the excited state relative to the ground state canthen be obtained by nding frequencies of the time-dependent perturbation where the density response functionhas a pole By considering only the linear density response it is then possible to nd a non-Hermitian eigenvalue

4

problem whose solutions are the poles of the response function This eigenvalue problem can be written as(A BB A

) (XI

YI

)= EI

(1 00 minus1

) (XI

YI

) (1)

Here the matrices A and B are called orbital rotation Hessians [87] and depend on orbital energy dierences andintegrals over the two-electron Coulomb and exchange operators Once a solution to (1) has been found in additionto the excitation energy EI one also obtains the response vector (XI YI ) This vector is similar to the CI vectorfrom a conguration interaction or multi-reference calculation The vector XI corresponds to excitations fromoccupied to virtual orbitals eg vector element X I

ia is the coecient corresponding to an excitation from an occupiedorbital i to a virtual orbital a The vector YI corresponds to ldquode-excitationsrdquo from virtual into occupied orbitalsThese de-excitations which follow from the derivation of LR TD-DFT equations do not possess a clear physicalmeaning [40] and are usually dismissed in the discussions Ignoring the de-excitations in equation (1) is known asthe Tamm-Damco approximation (TDA) [88]

AXI = EIXI (2)

The TDA is often applied in TD-DFT for computational eciency reasons as it replaces a non-Hermitian eigenvalueproblem by a Hermitian eigenvalue problem of half the size Even more it has been pointed out that the TDAsometimes leads to improved results by avoiding triplet instabilities for range-separated hybrid functionals [89] Forthese reasons we will restrict ourselves to the TDA in the following More information regarding wave functionanalysis for full TD-DFT can be found in Ref [90] and regarding mathematical considerations relevant to de-excitationsin Ref [91]

One of the complexes considered in this tutorial is [Ir(ppy)3] (ppy=2-phenylpyridyl) which is a strongly phospho-rescent compound used in OLED design [92] (for a more comprehensive introduction of this complex see Section 41)Its frontier orbitals ie the ones mainly involved in the low-lying excitations are depicted in Figure 1 The threehighest occupied orbitals (Ha He1 He2) are combinations of metal 5d orbitals and ligand π orbitals whereas the threelowest unoccupied orbitals (La Le1 Le2) are linear combinations of ligand π lowast orbitals with little metal contributionsThese frontier orbitals are characteristic for many pseudo-octahedral complexes with D3 or C3 symmetry [16] Notehowever that although our calculations used a symmetric geometry the calculations were performed withoutsymmetrymdashas is practiced often

In order to perform an analysis of the computed excited state the excitation vector XI is needed Most commonlythe excited states are analyzed by identifying the largest contributions X I

ia to the excitation vector By manualinspection the orbitals i and a are then assigned to some orbital classmdasheg metal-centered or ligand centered Thenif i is a metal-centered orbital and a is a ligand-centered orbital the electronic state is characterized as an MLCTstate In Table 1 we compile the excitation energies symmetries and leading excitations for the rst six triplet statesof [Ir(ppy)3] As can be seen the lowest six triplet states are very close in energy (within 03 eV) and due to thesymmetry of the molecule are grouped into (near-)degenerate sets of states The states T4 to T6 are actually so closein energy that it is not possible to identify which is the A state and which are the E states and are thus labeled as alinear combination of both Table 1 lists all the contributions with a weight |X I

ia |2 of at least 015 These contributionsrepresent at least 58 of each of the shown states and it is thus possible to provide a qualitative state assignmentbased on this table Because the occupied orbitals are mixed metal-ligand-centered and the virtual orbitals are mostlyligand-centered it can be said that the six triplet states all have mixed MLCT IL and LLCT character

Beyond this basic qualitative nding it is hard to gain further knowledge from the coecients in Table 1 It isdicult to discern any dierences between these six states as they are complicated linear combinations of dierentexcitations Moreover it is very hard to answer questions like ldquoAre the ligand-centered contributions combinationsof local excitations (IL) or charge transfer (LLCT) excitationsrdquo It is also not clear from Table 1 whether the statesshown are actually multi-congurational states or whether an orbital representation could be found where a singleconguration is sucient to describe one of the states

One of the basic problems of the above analysis is that when expressed in the basis of the canonical Kohn-Shamorbitals the excited states are often linear combinations of many dierent excitations with similar weightsmdashas

5

E

Ha

He1 He2

La

Le1 Le2

EA

AE

ndash575 eVndash560 eV

ndash175 eVndash162 eV

Figure 1 Depiction of the frontier canonical orbitals for [Ir(ppy)3] The gure also denes the orbital labels Ha He1 He2 for the highest occupiedorbitals and La Le1 Le2 for the lowest unoccupied orbitals (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water) see Appendix A for full computationaldetails)

Table 1 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and leading excitations with coecients Xia for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym Leading excitationsT1 289 A +085HaLa +032He1Le2 +032He2Le1T2 293 E +058HaLe1 +049HaLe2T3 293 E +058HaLe2 minus049HaLe1T4 317 A+E +048He1Le1 +044He2Le1 +041He1LaT5 317 A+E +056He2La +046He2Le2 minus042He2Le1T6 317 A+E minus056He1La +053He1Le2 +045HaLe2

exemplied in Table 1 In such a case the actual state character is determined by the (non-trivial) interferencepatterns between the excitations as visible by the dierent signs of the coecients in the table In order to simplifythe interpretation it is advantageous to seek an orbital representation which is more suitable to express the excitedstates in a simple and compact form Ideally this representation should also be method independent because thereare subtle dierences in the interpretation of eg canonical Kohn-Sham orbitals versus Hartree-Fock or CASSCForbitals and between the response vector from TD-DFT versus the conguration interaction vectors from wavefunction-based methods [40 93]

To this end in the following we will heavily use the one-electron transition density matrix (1TDM) TI J whoseelements in general can be dened as [71]

T I Jr s =

langΨI

adaggerr as ΨJ rang (3)

Here adaggerr is the creation operator for orbital ϕr as the annihilation operator for orbital ϕs and I and J are twoexcited state indices We will mostly consider transition density matrices between the ground state and an excited

6

state I which we write as TI Such a 1TDM is closely related to physical observables like the transition dipolemoment [71] showing that the 1TDM is a suitable basis for a more physically meaningful analysis of excited-statecharacter For methods which allow describing higher excitations (multi-reference quadratic response etc) therewill also be two-electron and higher transition density matrices but these contribute only little for states which arepredominantly described as single-excitations

In TD-DFT which employs a single-determinant ground state the 1TDM TI is directly related to the responsevector Within the TDA the following assignment is made

T Iia = X I

ia (4)

where i runs over the occupied orbitals and a over the virtual ones

With the 1TDM dened we can now introduce the concept of natural transition orbitals (NTOs) [70 94 95]These are obtained by a singular value decomposition of the 1TDM

TI = VIcopyshyshylaquoλI1

λI2

ordfregregnotWIdagger (5)

Analogously it can be stated that the unitary matrices VI and WI contain the eigenvectors of the hole and particledensity matrices (TITIdagger and TIdaggerTI respectively) [71] From the matrix VI one can construct the NTOs of the excitationhole by summing over the appropriate occupied orbitals

ψ h Ip (r) =

sumi isinocc

V Iipϕi (r) (6)

and from the matrix WI the NTOs of the excited electron by summing over the virtual orbitals

ψ e Ip (r) =

sumaisinvirt

W Iapϕa(r) (7)

The value (λIp )2 then gives the weight of the excitationψ h Ip rarr ψ e I

p in the excited state I The strength of the NTOtransformation is that usually only a few (λIp )2 are signicantly larger than zero and by considering only those fewexcitations a very compact representation for the excited state can be obtained The number of signicant NTOscontributing to a given state can be quantied by the NTO participation ratio (PR) [70]

PRINTO =

(sump (λIp )2

)2sump (λIp )4

(8)

which is a measure of how many single-particle excitations are necessary to describe a state and thus its multi-congurational character This value is always greater or equal to one PRNTO has an important practical implicationie it shows how many orbitals should be visualized More importantly the number of non-vanishing NTOamplitudes have a clear physical meaning that can be interpreted in the context of static electron correlation [96]exciton formation [70 97] and entanglement between the electron and hole quasiparticles [98] The PRNTO value hasbeen applied practically to quantify charge resonance interactions during excimer formation of organic molecules[70 99] and to understand the intermediate states involved in two-photon absorption [100]

In Figure 2 we plot the most important NTOs for the six triplet states discussed above The NTOs represent theexcitations more compactly than the canonical orbitals did as can be seen from the sums of weights Indeed for allstates the shown NTOs represent at least 90 which is much better than the 58 represented in Table 1 Whereaseach individual state can be represented with few NTO pairs it is now necessary to plot (generally dierent) NTOsfor each state so that a large number of NTOs will be needed to represent a large set of excited states

7

074 012 012

T1 289 eV (173)

067 031

T2 293 eV (182)

070 020

T3 293 eV (181)

094

T4 317 eV (111)

091

T5 317 eV (117)

093

T6 317 eV (113)

Figure 2 Depiction of the leading NTO pairs for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] with the weights of the NTO pairs given above the arrowsThe labels under each set of NTOs indicates the shown state the excitation energy and the PRNTO in parenthesis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

The analysis of the NTOs in Figure 2 allows obtaining qualitative insight into the state characters beyond theinsight gained from Table 1 First PRNTO allows judging the multi-congurational character of the states showingthat the rst three triplets are indeed multi-congurationalmdashas could be anticipated above On the contrary T4T5 and T6 are identied as virtually single-congurational statesmdasha fact that could hardly be expected from thecanonical orbital representation Moreover in the NTO basis we can qualitatively distinguish between IL and LLCTtransitions T1T2 andT3 seem to mostly involve local IL excitations besides the MLCT character This is unexpectedsince in the canonical representation T2 and T3 were mixtures of excitations from the Ha orbital which is fullydelocalized The higher triplets constitute a set of LLCT statesmdashagain with some MLCT admixturemdashwhere theelectron is excited counterclockwise (in the used orientation and for the employed enantiomer of [Ir(ppy)3]) fromone ligand to another one Hence the six triplet states can be described as a set of three MLCTIL states and threehigher-energy LLCTMLCT states

On a side note T4 T5 and T6 do not reect the proper symmetry of the molecule because our calculation did notconsider explicit symmetry This symmetry breaking can be explained by the fact that the three states are nearlydegenerate and therefore can mix Now apparently the computation converged to three states where the excitationsare clearly localized Oppositely one can expect that the properly symmetrized states would be more delocalizedforming one A state which is a positive linear combination of the three states and a pair of E states Neverthelessthese symmetrized states would still retain their counterclockwise CT characters even though this might not beimmediately visible in the NTO representation of the symmetrized states This discussion shows that in this complexthe states have a tendency to easily break symmetry

Whereas the NTOs contain the full information of the initial TDA computation there are also ways to reducethis information and represent the excitation in an even more compact way A weighted sum of the electron and holeNTOs leads to the electron and hole densities [71]

ρIh(r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ h Ip (r)

)2(9)

ρIe (r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ e Ip (r)

)2(10)

also termed (unrelaxed) attachment and detachment densities [101] The dierence between these two leads to the

8

unrelaxed dierence densityρIdi (r) = ρIh(r) minus ρIe (r) (11)

while the sumρIspin(r) = ρIh(r) + ρIe (r) (12)

corresponds to the spin-density in a high-spin triplet computation

If one goes beyond the TDA eg with full TD-DFT wave function based methods or by including orbitalrelaxations as present in the theory of analytical energy gradients [102] these simple rules connecting the NTOswith the dierence and spin densities no longer apply and a wealth of new information can be extracted from thedeviations of these quantities provided suitable analysis methods are chosen [71] In particular a comparison of theNTOs with the eigenvectors of the relaxed dierence density matrixmdashtermed natural dierence orbitalsmdashproved to bevery useful for analyzing secondary orbital relaxation eects accompanying the main excitation process [103] It wasshown that these eects were particularly pronounced for the MLCT states of a small model iridium complex wherethe occupied d-orbitals contracted after one electron was removed [81]

3 Quantication of excited state localization and charge transfer

In the following section we show how it is possible to identify state characters based on the computation ofdescriptors while avoiding entirely the visual inspection of orbitals As alluded to in the introduction a numericalcharacterization of excited states promises several advantages it allows avoiding laborious manual work and can beautomatized for a large number of excited states it is objective reproducible and more precise it allows spottingsmall dierences trends or continuous changes and nally can reveal physics which cannot be represented throughorbital pictures

One such descriptor the PRNTO value of equation (8) was already introduced above In the following we willintroduce another kind of descriptor the charge transfer number [70 104] which will be our main tool for theremainder of the text The following subsections will rst generally outline the underlying theory and show examplesfor the most common case of non-relativistic (or scalar relativistic) wave functions Subsequently we will presentthe rst application of the same methodology to spin-orbit coupled relativistic states Finally motivated by the factthat in certain situations the dierent computed charge transfer numbers are strongly correlated we present a novelclustering ansatz which allows automatically dividing a molecule into chromophoric subunits

31 Charge transfer numbers

Excited states are usually discussed in terms of where the excitation originatesmdashie where the excitation hole islocalizedmdashand where it goes tomdashie where the excited electron is localized For example the excitation in an MLCTstate originates at a metal orbital and goes to one or more ligands an IL state originates at a ligand and goes to adierent orbital at the same ligand The purpose of the charge transfer numbers is to formalize this concept Againthe 1TDM TI is considered as the central object but instead of visualizing it we partition it among dierent fragmentsof the molecular system under study Mathematically speaking the fragments are mutually disjoint subsets of theatoms of the molecule Usually the fragments are dened by chemical intuition eg each ligand of a complex istreated as a separate fragment but later on we will also discuss strategies for automatic fragmentation

The rst step is a transformation of the 1TDM from the MO basis to the atomic orbital (AO) basis

TI = CTICT (13)

where C is the MO-coecient matrix The square of an element of this matrix (T Imicroν )2 measures the contribution

of an excitation originating on the atomic orbital (AO) χmicro and going to the AO χν The charge transfer numberΩIAB is now intended to measure the total contributions of excitations that originate at any AO centered on an atom

of fragment A and go to any AO on fragment B In a naive implementation one could simply sum over all (T Imicroν )2

9

elements where micro lies on A and ν lies on B However for a rigorous computation it is necessary to apply a populationanalysis scheme that takes into account the non-orthogonality of the AOs There is no unique way of dividing thedensity among atoms and a number of dierent population analysis schemes have been devised [105] Two suchanalysis schemes were adapted for analyzing the 1TDM [71 106] and implemented in TheoDORE First it is possible[71] to partition the 1TDM in the spirit of a Mulliken analysis

ΩIAB =

12

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

[(TI S)microν (STI )microν + T I

microν (STI S)microν] (14)

where S is the AO overlap matrix yielding an equation that is related to Mayerrsquos bond order [107] Alternatively aLoumlwdin orthogonalization can be applied to TI [106] leading to the orthogonal matrix

TI = S12TI S12 (15)

which can be directly used for summation

ΩIAB =

summicro isinA

sumν isinB(T Imicroν )2 (16)

In the implementation used here the Loumlwdin orthogonalization proceeds by using the following identity

TI = S12TI S12 = (PQT)TI (PQT)T (17)

where P and Q are the matrices containing the left and right singular vectors of the MO-coecient matrix C It isthus possible to evaluate Equation (16) without knowledge of the AO overlap matrix S and a similar consideration[70] also applies for Equation (14) Whereas Equation (14) was initially implemented in TheoDORE it is advisable torather apply the Loumlwdin style partitioning of Equation (16) since it is computationally more ecient and in mostcases numerically more stable (ie the ΩI

AB values are strictly positive which is not necessarily the case for theMulliken partitioning) It is in principle possible to extend this formalism to other more involved population analysisschemes but this has not been attempted yet

Finally the quantityΩI =

sumAB

ΩIAB =

sumr s

(T Ir s )2 =

sump

(λIp )2 (18)

which is equivalent to the Frobenius norm of T (or T) can be dened [71 108] In the case of a normalized CISor TDA wave function this value is always equal to 1 whereas it is generally less than 1 for correlated ab initiomethods [103 109] In the latter case the ΩI value can be applied as a method-independent measure for the single-excitation character where ΩI = 1 corresponds to a pure singly excited state and smaller values indicate contributionsfrom double or higher excitations The physical meaning of ΩI is that it allows making some statements abouttransition properties of one-electron operators [108] Specically from ΩI = 0 it follows that 〈Ψ0 |O (1) |ΨI 〉 = 0 forany possible one-electron operator O (1) for example the dipole moment operator or a spin-orbit operator in a meaneld approximation

For a system of nfrag fragments the charge transfer number analysis produces an nfrag times nfrag matrix with allthe possible contributions Here the diagonal elements ΩI

AA correspond to local excitations on fragment A whileΩIAB A B are charge transfer contributions The matrix elements ΩI

AB can be directly plotted in the form of atwo-dimensional matrix plot (sometimes called electron-hole pair correlation plot) as has been discussed for examplein Refs [79 110ndash112]

Such matrix plots are shown in Figure 3 for the T1 minusT6 states of [Ir(ppy)3] denoting the three ppy ligands asL1 L2 and L3 Starting with the T1 state (Figure 3a) it is observed that the three strongest contributions (16 each)are situated on the diagonal corresponding to local excitations on each of the three ligands In addition threecontributions (13 each) are seen corresponding to IrrarrL excitations The same types of transitions are also presentfor theT2 andT3 (Figure 3b-c) states with the exception that the symmetry is broken and the ligands do not contribute

10

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

1 13 13 13

0 16 2 2

0 2 16 2

0 2 2 16

(a) T1 (289 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 19 1 16

1 29 0 2

0 2 0 2

1 2 0 24

(b) T2 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 5 23 8

0 7 2 1

1 1 35 1

1 1 3 11

(c) T3 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3Ir

L1L2

L32 1 2 46

1 0 1 22

0 0 1 7

1 0 0 15

(d) T4 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 3 45 2

0 1 6 0

1 1 14 1

1 1 22 0

(e) T5 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 46 3 1

0 14 1 1

1 22 1 1

0 7 1 0

(f) T6 (317 eV)

Figure 3 Matrix plots of the charge transfer numbers for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] In the plots the magnitude of the elements of the4 times 4 matrices are given by the color the numbers give the numerical value (in ) The labels L1 L2 and L3 denote the three ppy ligands Theexcitation hole is plotted on the vertical axis the excited electron on the horizontal axis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

equally to these states The states T4 to T6 (Figures 3d-f) show distinctly dierent plots as opposed to the rst threestates In these cases only one column of the matrix shows signicant contributions meaning that the excited electronis localized on one of the ligands The excitation hole always has its strongest contribution on Ir (46) the secondcontribution (22) is of LLCT type (Li rarrLj i j) and only the third contribution (14ndash15) is of IL type (Li rarrLi )

While the plots shown in Figure 3 provide a compact and rigorous representation of the excitations it is oftenconvenient to further compress the information For this purpose for each state partial sums are computed over allthe contributions that correspond to one of the ve classes of TMC excited states MC MLCT LMCT IL and LLCTHere the IrrarrIr matrix element gives the MC contribution to the state the sum of the IrrarrLi elements gives theMLCT contribution and so on This generic partitioning of the charge transfer number matrix is shown in Figure 4It can be applied to homoleptic complexes or more generally to TMCs where all ligands are treated as equivalentInstead of plotting the whole matrix of ΩI

AB it is now possible to identify one or two dominant contributions andrepresent them in tabular form Naturally the downside of this compression is that some information is lostmdashin thiscase the information about excitation localization on the individual ligands Hence one should carefully decide onthe degree of data compression depending on the application

For the six triplets of [Ir(ppy)3] the results of this analysis are shown in Table 2 It can be readily seen that thesix states form two strongly related sets of states T1 T2 and T3 have almost identical state character contributionsand the three other states likewise Furthermore it can be argued that the obtained numeric values provide moreinsight than that gained above from the NTOs Accordingly it can be seen that the three lowest-lying triplet statesare predominantly ligand-centered with around 50 IL character and only around 35 MLCT In contrast the higherstates are of predominant MLCT (50) character and possess LLCT character as a secondary contribution (31)

The information contained in the table can also be depicted in compact form as shown in Figure 5 where theenergy is depicted with horizontal bars the main state character is indicated by the color of these horizontal barsand the contributions to the state character are shown in stacked bar plots The advantage of this gure is that it canbe easily scaled to a relatively large number of states by simply making the bars narrower For instance 30ndash50 statescan be depicted in a gure of similar size (as will be shown below) while a table conveying the same information for50 states would probably take more than half a page Moreover spotting trends or patterns within the table would bemuch more cumbersome than glancing at the colors of the gure

11

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

HolePo

sition

Electron Position

MC MLCT

LMCT(Ph)3

rarr(Ph)3

IL

IL

IL

LLCT

LLCT

Figure 4 Division of the charge transfer matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states

Table 2 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and most important state character contributions for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym State characterT1 289 A 49 IL 38 MLCTT2 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT3 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT4 317 A+E 49 MLCT 31 LLCTT5 317 A+E 50 MLCT 31 LLCTT6 317 A+E 50 MLCT 32 LLCT

In summary the presented protocol enables a completely automatized quantitative and reproducible assignmentof state characters in TMCs In Sections 41 to 45 we will show that the methodology can be applied benecially incases where a larger number of states are to be analyzed where detailed understanding of ligand eects is needed orto rationalize the eects of geometric modications

32 Charge transfer numbers for spin-mixed states

In TMCs SOC is very relevant due to the large nuclear charge of the metal atom SOC is often included in theelectronic Hamiltonian as a perturbation [41 113ndash116]

H el = HMCH + H SOC (19)

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6020406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

) LLCTILLMCTMLCTMC

29303132

E(e

V)

Figure 5 Decomposition of the charge transfer number matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

12

where HMCH is the molecular Coulomb Hamiltonian (MCH) [117] which contains the (scalar relativistic) kinetic energyand Coulomb potential energies of the electrons In practice one usually rst computes a number of eigenstatesof the MCH (ΨMCH also called spin-free states) eg singlets and triplets and subsequently evaluates the SOCmatrix elements within this set of states The spin-orbit-coupled states (or diagonal states) can then be obtained ina perturbative fashion by a diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix where the diagonal elements contain theenergies of the MCH states and the o-diagonal elements are the SOCs The approximation of this step is neglectingthe SOC matrix elements with all higher states not computed in the rst step The diagonalization of HMCHmdashwithelements HMCH

I J = 〈ΨMCHI |H el |ΨMCH

J 〉mdashcan be written as

Hdiag = UdaggerHMCHU (20)

where U is the eigenvector matrix of HMCH The matrix U allows reconstructing the wave function of the diagonalstate in terms of the MCH states

|Ψdiagα 〉 =

sumI

|ΨMCHI 〉UIα (21)

Assuming that the ground state Ψ0 is not aected by this transformation which is often a good approximation the1TDM between the ground state and an excited diagonal state is given by

T αr s =langΨ0

adaggerr as Ψdiagα

rang (22)

which after insertion of Equation (21) reads

T αr s =sumI

langΨ0

adaggerr as ΨMCHI

rangUIα =

sumI

T Ir sUIα (23)

Insertion into Equation (17) shows that the same relations also holds for the orthogonalized matrices ie

T αr s =sumI

T Ir sUIα (24)

and Equation (16) nally leads to

ΩαAB =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ α

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

T ImicroνT

Jmicroν =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ αΩIminusJAB (25)

Here the diagonal elements ΩIminusIAB are equivalent to the charge transfer numbers ΩI

AB of the MCH states as denedabove and the o-diagonal ΩIminusJ

AB terms are computed in an analogous fashion using the 1TDMs of two dierentstates Importantly the evaluation of Equation (25) does not require any signicant additional computational eortwhen compared to the MCH case since all required TI matrices are already available This transformation has beennewly implemented into TheoDORE in the course of this work and we will illustrate its potential below

In order to visualize the resulting data we rst consider a plot of the energies versus oscillator strengths Figure 6shows these two quantities for the lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] The spin-pure (singlet and triplet) states in theMCH representation are denoted by open rings and the spin-mixed states in the diagonal representation by lledcircles As the diagonal states do not have a well-dened total spin value we indicate the total spin expectation valueof these states by color Additionally we draw arrows between the MCH and diagonal states in such a way that it canbe discerned which MCH states contribute to which diagonal states In that way the plot can be used to analyze theelectronic structure of the diagonal states in a visual way At rst glance the complexity of the diagonal states can beappreciated ie in most cases the diagonal states are a linear combination of a large number of dierent MCH states

The reason to show energies versus oscillator strengths is that for [Ir(ppy)3] and related complexes the characterof the lowest diagonal triplet states (the sublevels of theT1) is decisive for its phosphorescence properties Ideally thelowest triplet sublevel should have signicant oscillator strength in order to facilitate fast and ecient phosphorescentdecay It has been shown by theoretical arguments [16 118] that for pseudo-octahedral complexes of trigonal

13

T1T23 T4minus6

S1

S23

X1

28 30 32 34 36

000

001

002

Energy (eV)

Osc

illat

orst

reng

th

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3

〈S2〉

Figure 6 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and oscillator strengths of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] in theMCH representation (open rings) and in the diagonal representation (lled circles) For each state the color indicates the spin multiplicitymdashredor blue for the spin-pure MCH states or any intermediate color for the spin-mixed diagonal states The arrows indicate which MCH statescontribute to which diagonal states with the arrow thickness indicating the weight of the contributions X1 denotes the lowest diagonal state(TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

T1

T23

T4minus6

S1 S2

X1

28 30 32 34 3610

20

30

40

50

60

Energy (eV)

MLC

Tch

arac

ter

()

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3〈S

2〉

Figure 7 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and MLCT character of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] Themeaning of the colors and arrows is the same as in Figure 6 (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

symmetry the lowest triplet sublevel is forbidden from decaying radiatively while the higher sublevels are allowedto phosphoresce This result is recovered in our calculations as can be seen in Figure 6 where the lowest diagonalstate (labeled ldquoX1rdquo) has an oscillator strength of zero The plot also shows that some of the other sublevels of T1T2 and T3 indeed acquire small oscillator strengths Figure 6 also reveals that the intensity of these states does notoriginate from the lowest singlet states S1 minus S3 as one might have assumed initially but it actually derives from therelatively bright S4 and S5 state pair (not shown due to scale) A possible explanation for this nding is given bythe general properties of the spin-orbit operator which govern the magnitude of the SOCs [114] Accordingly ina TMC one can expect very large SOCs between a singlet I and a triplet J if the transition I rarr J is a one-electron

14

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

states is to be analyzed eg ensemble calculations of spectra trajectory simulations or higher excited states [75ndash78]Therefore it is expected to be particularly helpful in the case of TMCs where a high density of electronic excitedstates of various characters is present One additional advantage of these quantitative tools is that they eliminate therole of subjective reasoning in the discussions State characters are dened based on well-dened equations ratherthan on the individual subjective interpretation of a molecular orbital (MO) Quantitative tools can also reveal subtletrends such as ldquosubstitution at some position by a uorine atom increases the MLCT character of a state by 5rdquo Lastbut not least the application of sophisticated analysis tools has allowed identifying physical phenomena such asexcitonic correlation [79 80] and secondary orbital relaxation [81] which could otherwise not be understood evenqualitatively in the canonical MO picture

These wave function analysis tools are implemented in the TheoDORE package [82] which provides interfacesto a wide range of quantum chemistry programs and electronic structure methods As part of this work we report anew interface between the TheoDORE and ADF [83] program packages that allows for a quantitative analysis oflarge-scale TD-DFT computations and also provides the possibility of analyzing spin-orbit coupled states In additionwe use integrated analysis utilities in the Q-Chem [71 84] and Molcas [85 86] program packages in connection withwave function-based single- and multi-reference methods where appropriate

The goal of this review is to present a variety of powerful ways in which wave function analysis can be appliedto TMC excited-state computations First we shall introduce several orbital transformation techniques which can beused to represent excitations (Section 2) By means of descriptors like single-excitation contribution charge transfernumbers or entanglement measures we move away from orbital visualization to a purely numeric representation ofthe excitations and we show how these descriptors can be used to compactly depict large number of excited states(Section 31 and 32) We also show that a statistical analysis of the numeric descriptors can lead to further insightwhich is otherwise not attainable by simple inspection of the wave functions (Section 33)

The applicability of these tools will be demonstrated in a series of calculations on prototypical TMCs containingIr(III) Ru(II) and Re(I) centers (Section 4) Five case studies will illustrate the potential of quantitative analysistechniques at deciphering the excited state characters in dierent situations such as (i) How are the excited-statecharacters aected by nuclear relaxation (ii) How does SOC change the mixing ratios between the dierent classesof excited states (iii) How are the excited-state characters inuence by the ligand substitution (iv) How can theinteraction of the metal center and the ligands be quantied (v) And nally how does the electronic structuremethod aect the electronic excited states and how can one easily compare a multitude of electronic states computedat diering levels of theory

2 Visual inspection of orbitals

For pedagogical purposes we begin reviewing qualitative procedures to analyze electronic wave functionsWithout any doubt the most common way to do so is by inspecting visually the involved orbitals Despite this beingan intuitive procedure it should be remembered that the orbitals are only mathematical objects without a directphysical meaning [16] As a consequence there is not one ldquotruerdquo set of orbitals but a number of dierent visualizationtechniques that can be applied leading to dierent sets of orbitals Depending on the visualization technique chosenthe orbital shapes and thus the apparent state characters can be quite dierent Hence we commence this section byintroducing the dierent techniques available to carry out a qualitative wave function analysis based on the visualinspection of MOs The goal could be formulated as identifying the ldquotextbookrdquo state character of a given electronicexcited state For this purpose we shall focus on linear-response (LR) TD-DFT but most of the techniques describedin this and the following sections can be applied to states computed with other electronic structure methods as well

In TD-DFT one considers the response of the electronic density of some molecule to a small time-dependentperturbation [53ndash55] The excitation energies EI ie the energy of the excited state relative to the ground state canthen be obtained by nding frequencies of the time-dependent perturbation where the density response functionhas a pole By considering only the linear density response it is then possible to nd a non-Hermitian eigenvalue

4

problem whose solutions are the poles of the response function This eigenvalue problem can be written as(A BB A

) (XI

YI

)= EI

(1 00 minus1

) (XI

YI

) (1)

Here the matrices A and B are called orbital rotation Hessians [87] and depend on orbital energy dierences andintegrals over the two-electron Coulomb and exchange operators Once a solution to (1) has been found in additionto the excitation energy EI one also obtains the response vector (XI YI ) This vector is similar to the CI vectorfrom a conguration interaction or multi-reference calculation The vector XI corresponds to excitations fromoccupied to virtual orbitals eg vector element X I

ia is the coecient corresponding to an excitation from an occupiedorbital i to a virtual orbital a The vector YI corresponds to ldquode-excitationsrdquo from virtual into occupied orbitalsThese de-excitations which follow from the derivation of LR TD-DFT equations do not possess a clear physicalmeaning [40] and are usually dismissed in the discussions Ignoring the de-excitations in equation (1) is known asthe Tamm-Damco approximation (TDA) [88]

AXI = EIXI (2)

The TDA is often applied in TD-DFT for computational eciency reasons as it replaces a non-Hermitian eigenvalueproblem by a Hermitian eigenvalue problem of half the size Even more it has been pointed out that the TDAsometimes leads to improved results by avoiding triplet instabilities for range-separated hybrid functionals [89] Forthese reasons we will restrict ourselves to the TDA in the following More information regarding wave functionanalysis for full TD-DFT can be found in Ref [90] and regarding mathematical considerations relevant to de-excitationsin Ref [91]

One of the complexes considered in this tutorial is [Ir(ppy)3] (ppy=2-phenylpyridyl) which is a strongly phospho-rescent compound used in OLED design [92] (for a more comprehensive introduction of this complex see Section 41)Its frontier orbitals ie the ones mainly involved in the low-lying excitations are depicted in Figure 1 The threehighest occupied orbitals (Ha He1 He2) are combinations of metal 5d orbitals and ligand π orbitals whereas the threelowest unoccupied orbitals (La Le1 Le2) are linear combinations of ligand π lowast orbitals with little metal contributionsThese frontier orbitals are characteristic for many pseudo-octahedral complexes with D3 or C3 symmetry [16] Notehowever that although our calculations used a symmetric geometry the calculations were performed withoutsymmetrymdashas is practiced often

In order to perform an analysis of the computed excited state the excitation vector XI is needed Most commonlythe excited states are analyzed by identifying the largest contributions X I

ia to the excitation vector By manualinspection the orbitals i and a are then assigned to some orbital classmdasheg metal-centered or ligand centered Thenif i is a metal-centered orbital and a is a ligand-centered orbital the electronic state is characterized as an MLCTstate In Table 1 we compile the excitation energies symmetries and leading excitations for the rst six triplet statesof [Ir(ppy)3] As can be seen the lowest six triplet states are very close in energy (within 03 eV) and due to thesymmetry of the molecule are grouped into (near-)degenerate sets of states The states T4 to T6 are actually so closein energy that it is not possible to identify which is the A state and which are the E states and are thus labeled as alinear combination of both Table 1 lists all the contributions with a weight |X I

ia |2 of at least 015 These contributionsrepresent at least 58 of each of the shown states and it is thus possible to provide a qualitative state assignmentbased on this table Because the occupied orbitals are mixed metal-ligand-centered and the virtual orbitals are mostlyligand-centered it can be said that the six triplet states all have mixed MLCT IL and LLCT character

Beyond this basic qualitative nding it is hard to gain further knowledge from the coecients in Table 1 It isdicult to discern any dierences between these six states as they are complicated linear combinations of dierentexcitations Moreover it is very hard to answer questions like ldquoAre the ligand-centered contributions combinationsof local excitations (IL) or charge transfer (LLCT) excitationsrdquo It is also not clear from Table 1 whether the statesshown are actually multi-congurational states or whether an orbital representation could be found where a singleconguration is sucient to describe one of the states

One of the basic problems of the above analysis is that when expressed in the basis of the canonical Kohn-Shamorbitals the excited states are often linear combinations of many dierent excitations with similar weightsmdashas

5

E

Ha

He1 He2

La

Le1 Le2

EA

AE

ndash575 eVndash560 eV

ndash175 eVndash162 eV

Figure 1 Depiction of the frontier canonical orbitals for [Ir(ppy)3] The gure also denes the orbital labels Ha He1 He2 for the highest occupiedorbitals and La Le1 Le2 for the lowest unoccupied orbitals (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water) see Appendix A for full computationaldetails)

Table 1 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and leading excitations with coecients Xia for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym Leading excitationsT1 289 A +085HaLa +032He1Le2 +032He2Le1T2 293 E +058HaLe1 +049HaLe2T3 293 E +058HaLe2 minus049HaLe1T4 317 A+E +048He1Le1 +044He2Le1 +041He1LaT5 317 A+E +056He2La +046He2Le2 minus042He2Le1T6 317 A+E minus056He1La +053He1Le2 +045HaLe2

exemplied in Table 1 In such a case the actual state character is determined by the (non-trivial) interferencepatterns between the excitations as visible by the dierent signs of the coecients in the table In order to simplifythe interpretation it is advantageous to seek an orbital representation which is more suitable to express the excitedstates in a simple and compact form Ideally this representation should also be method independent because thereare subtle dierences in the interpretation of eg canonical Kohn-Sham orbitals versus Hartree-Fock or CASSCForbitals and between the response vector from TD-DFT versus the conguration interaction vectors from wavefunction-based methods [40 93]

To this end in the following we will heavily use the one-electron transition density matrix (1TDM) TI J whoseelements in general can be dened as [71]

T I Jr s =

langΨI

adaggerr as ΨJ rang (3)

Here adaggerr is the creation operator for orbital ϕr as the annihilation operator for orbital ϕs and I and J are twoexcited state indices We will mostly consider transition density matrices between the ground state and an excited

6

state I which we write as TI Such a 1TDM is closely related to physical observables like the transition dipolemoment [71] showing that the 1TDM is a suitable basis for a more physically meaningful analysis of excited-statecharacter For methods which allow describing higher excitations (multi-reference quadratic response etc) therewill also be two-electron and higher transition density matrices but these contribute only little for states which arepredominantly described as single-excitations

In TD-DFT which employs a single-determinant ground state the 1TDM TI is directly related to the responsevector Within the TDA the following assignment is made

T Iia = X I

ia (4)

where i runs over the occupied orbitals and a over the virtual ones

With the 1TDM dened we can now introduce the concept of natural transition orbitals (NTOs) [70 94 95]These are obtained by a singular value decomposition of the 1TDM

TI = VIcopyshyshylaquoλI1

λI2

ordfregregnotWIdagger (5)

Analogously it can be stated that the unitary matrices VI and WI contain the eigenvectors of the hole and particledensity matrices (TITIdagger and TIdaggerTI respectively) [71] From the matrix VI one can construct the NTOs of the excitationhole by summing over the appropriate occupied orbitals

ψ h Ip (r) =

sumi isinocc

V Iipϕi (r) (6)

and from the matrix WI the NTOs of the excited electron by summing over the virtual orbitals

ψ e Ip (r) =

sumaisinvirt

W Iapϕa(r) (7)

The value (λIp )2 then gives the weight of the excitationψ h Ip rarr ψ e I

p in the excited state I The strength of the NTOtransformation is that usually only a few (λIp )2 are signicantly larger than zero and by considering only those fewexcitations a very compact representation for the excited state can be obtained The number of signicant NTOscontributing to a given state can be quantied by the NTO participation ratio (PR) [70]

PRINTO =

(sump (λIp )2

)2sump (λIp )4

(8)

which is a measure of how many single-particle excitations are necessary to describe a state and thus its multi-congurational character This value is always greater or equal to one PRNTO has an important practical implicationie it shows how many orbitals should be visualized More importantly the number of non-vanishing NTOamplitudes have a clear physical meaning that can be interpreted in the context of static electron correlation [96]exciton formation [70 97] and entanglement between the electron and hole quasiparticles [98] The PRNTO value hasbeen applied practically to quantify charge resonance interactions during excimer formation of organic molecules[70 99] and to understand the intermediate states involved in two-photon absorption [100]

In Figure 2 we plot the most important NTOs for the six triplet states discussed above The NTOs represent theexcitations more compactly than the canonical orbitals did as can be seen from the sums of weights Indeed for allstates the shown NTOs represent at least 90 which is much better than the 58 represented in Table 1 Whereaseach individual state can be represented with few NTO pairs it is now necessary to plot (generally dierent) NTOsfor each state so that a large number of NTOs will be needed to represent a large set of excited states

7

074 012 012

T1 289 eV (173)

067 031

T2 293 eV (182)

070 020

T3 293 eV (181)

094

T4 317 eV (111)

091

T5 317 eV (117)

093

T6 317 eV (113)

Figure 2 Depiction of the leading NTO pairs for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] with the weights of the NTO pairs given above the arrowsThe labels under each set of NTOs indicates the shown state the excitation energy and the PRNTO in parenthesis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

The analysis of the NTOs in Figure 2 allows obtaining qualitative insight into the state characters beyond theinsight gained from Table 1 First PRNTO allows judging the multi-congurational character of the states showingthat the rst three triplets are indeed multi-congurationalmdashas could be anticipated above On the contrary T4T5 and T6 are identied as virtually single-congurational statesmdasha fact that could hardly be expected from thecanonical orbital representation Moreover in the NTO basis we can qualitatively distinguish between IL and LLCTtransitions T1T2 andT3 seem to mostly involve local IL excitations besides the MLCT character This is unexpectedsince in the canonical representation T2 and T3 were mixtures of excitations from the Ha orbital which is fullydelocalized The higher triplets constitute a set of LLCT statesmdashagain with some MLCT admixturemdashwhere theelectron is excited counterclockwise (in the used orientation and for the employed enantiomer of [Ir(ppy)3]) fromone ligand to another one Hence the six triplet states can be described as a set of three MLCTIL states and threehigher-energy LLCTMLCT states

On a side note T4 T5 and T6 do not reect the proper symmetry of the molecule because our calculation did notconsider explicit symmetry This symmetry breaking can be explained by the fact that the three states are nearlydegenerate and therefore can mix Now apparently the computation converged to three states where the excitationsare clearly localized Oppositely one can expect that the properly symmetrized states would be more delocalizedforming one A state which is a positive linear combination of the three states and a pair of E states Neverthelessthese symmetrized states would still retain their counterclockwise CT characters even though this might not beimmediately visible in the NTO representation of the symmetrized states This discussion shows that in this complexthe states have a tendency to easily break symmetry

Whereas the NTOs contain the full information of the initial TDA computation there are also ways to reducethis information and represent the excitation in an even more compact way A weighted sum of the electron and holeNTOs leads to the electron and hole densities [71]

ρIh(r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ h Ip (r)

)2(9)

ρIe (r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ e Ip (r)

)2(10)

also termed (unrelaxed) attachment and detachment densities [101] The dierence between these two leads to the

8

unrelaxed dierence densityρIdi (r) = ρIh(r) minus ρIe (r) (11)

while the sumρIspin(r) = ρIh(r) + ρIe (r) (12)

corresponds to the spin-density in a high-spin triplet computation

If one goes beyond the TDA eg with full TD-DFT wave function based methods or by including orbitalrelaxations as present in the theory of analytical energy gradients [102] these simple rules connecting the NTOswith the dierence and spin densities no longer apply and a wealth of new information can be extracted from thedeviations of these quantities provided suitable analysis methods are chosen [71] In particular a comparison of theNTOs with the eigenvectors of the relaxed dierence density matrixmdashtermed natural dierence orbitalsmdashproved to bevery useful for analyzing secondary orbital relaxation eects accompanying the main excitation process [103] It wasshown that these eects were particularly pronounced for the MLCT states of a small model iridium complex wherethe occupied d-orbitals contracted after one electron was removed [81]

3 Quantication of excited state localization and charge transfer

In the following section we show how it is possible to identify state characters based on the computation ofdescriptors while avoiding entirely the visual inspection of orbitals As alluded to in the introduction a numericalcharacterization of excited states promises several advantages it allows avoiding laborious manual work and can beautomatized for a large number of excited states it is objective reproducible and more precise it allows spottingsmall dierences trends or continuous changes and nally can reveal physics which cannot be represented throughorbital pictures

One such descriptor the PRNTO value of equation (8) was already introduced above In the following we willintroduce another kind of descriptor the charge transfer number [70 104] which will be our main tool for theremainder of the text The following subsections will rst generally outline the underlying theory and show examplesfor the most common case of non-relativistic (or scalar relativistic) wave functions Subsequently we will presentthe rst application of the same methodology to spin-orbit coupled relativistic states Finally motivated by the factthat in certain situations the dierent computed charge transfer numbers are strongly correlated we present a novelclustering ansatz which allows automatically dividing a molecule into chromophoric subunits

31 Charge transfer numbers

Excited states are usually discussed in terms of where the excitation originatesmdashie where the excitation hole islocalizedmdashand where it goes tomdashie where the excited electron is localized For example the excitation in an MLCTstate originates at a metal orbital and goes to one or more ligands an IL state originates at a ligand and goes to adierent orbital at the same ligand The purpose of the charge transfer numbers is to formalize this concept Againthe 1TDM TI is considered as the central object but instead of visualizing it we partition it among dierent fragmentsof the molecular system under study Mathematically speaking the fragments are mutually disjoint subsets of theatoms of the molecule Usually the fragments are dened by chemical intuition eg each ligand of a complex istreated as a separate fragment but later on we will also discuss strategies for automatic fragmentation

The rst step is a transformation of the 1TDM from the MO basis to the atomic orbital (AO) basis

TI = CTICT (13)

where C is the MO-coecient matrix The square of an element of this matrix (T Imicroν )2 measures the contribution

of an excitation originating on the atomic orbital (AO) χmicro and going to the AO χν The charge transfer numberΩIAB is now intended to measure the total contributions of excitations that originate at any AO centered on an atom

of fragment A and go to any AO on fragment B In a naive implementation one could simply sum over all (T Imicroν )2

9

elements where micro lies on A and ν lies on B However for a rigorous computation it is necessary to apply a populationanalysis scheme that takes into account the non-orthogonality of the AOs There is no unique way of dividing thedensity among atoms and a number of dierent population analysis schemes have been devised [105] Two suchanalysis schemes were adapted for analyzing the 1TDM [71 106] and implemented in TheoDORE First it is possible[71] to partition the 1TDM in the spirit of a Mulliken analysis

ΩIAB =

12

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

[(TI S)microν (STI )microν + T I

microν (STI S)microν] (14)

where S is the AO overlap matrix yielding an equation that is related to Mayerrsquos bond order [107] Alternatively aLoumlwdin orthogonalization can be applied to TI [106] leading to the orthogonal matrix

TI = S12TI S12 (15)

which can be directly used for summation

ΩIAB =

summicro isinA

sumν isinB(T Imicroν )2 (16)

In the implementation used here the Loumlwdin orthogonalization proceeds by using the following identity

TI = S12TI S12 = (PQT)TI (PQT)T (17)

where P and Q are the matrices containing the left and right singular vectors of the MO-coecient matrix C It isthus possible to evaluate Equation (16) without knowledge of the AO overlap matrix S and a similar consideration[70] also applies for Equation (14) Whereas Equation (14) was initially implemented in TheoDORE it is advisable torather apply the Loumlwdin style partitioning of Equation (16) since it is computationally more ecient and in mostcases numerically more stable (ie the ΩI

AB values are strictly positive which is not necessarily the case for theMulliken partitioning) It is in principle possible to extend this formalism to other more involved population analysisschemes but this has not been attempted yet

Finally the quantityΩI =

sumAB

ΩIAB =

sumr s

(T Ir s )2 =

sump

(λIp )2 (18)

which is equivalent to the Frobenius norm of T (or T) can be dened [71 108] In the case of a normalized CISor TDA wave function this value is always equal to 1 whereas it is generally less than 1 for correlated ab initiomethods [103 109] In the latter case the ΩI value can be applied as a method-independent measure for the single-excitation character where ΩI = 1 corresponds to a pure singly excited state and smaller values indicate contributionsfrom double or higher excitations The physical meaning of ΩI is that it allows making some statements abouttransition properties of one-electron operators [108] Specically from ΩI = 0 it follows that 〈Ψ0 |O (1) |ΨI 〉 = 0 forany possible one-electron operator O (1) for example the dipole moment operator or a spin-orbit operator in a meaneld approximation

For a system of nfrag fragments the charge transfer number analysis produces an nfrag times nfrag matrix with allthe possible contributions Here the diagonal elements ΩI

AA correspond to local excitations on fragment A whileΩIAB A B are charge transfer contributions The matrix elements ΩI

AB can be directly plotted in the form of atwo-dimensional matrix plot (sometimes called electron-hole pair correlation plot) as has been discussed for examplein Refs [79 110ndash112]

Such matrix plots are shown in Figure 3 for the T1 minusT6 states of [Ir(ppy)3] denoting the three ppy ligands asL1 L2 and L3 Starting with the T1 state (Figure 3a) it is observed that the three strongest contributions (16 each)are situated on the diagonal corresponding to local excitations on each of the three ligands In addition threecontributions (13 each) are seen corresponding to IrrarrL excitations The same types of transitions are also presentfor theT2 andT3 (Figure 3b-c) states with the exception that the symmetry is broken and the ligands do not contribute

10

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

1 13 13 13

0 16 2 2

0 2 16 2

0 2 2 16

(a) T1 (289 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 19 1 16

1 29 0 2

0 2 0 2

1 2 0 24

(b) T2 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 5 23 8

0 7 2 1

1 1 35 1

1 1 3 11

(c) T3 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3Ir

L1L2

L32 1 2 46

1 0 1 22

0 0 1 7

1 0 0 15

(d) T4 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 3 45 2

0 1 6 0

1 1 14 1

1 1 22 0

(e) T5 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 46 3 1

0 14 1 1

1 22 1 1

0 7 1 0

(f) T6 (317 eV)

Figure 3 Matrix plots of the charge transfer numbers for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] In the plots the magnitude of the elements of the4 times 4 matrices are given by the color the numbers give the numerical value (in ) The labels L1 L2 and L3 denote the three ppy ligands Theexcitation hole is plotted on the vertical axis the excited electron on the horizontal axis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

equally to these states The states T4 to T6 (Figures 3d-f) show distinctly dierent plots as opposed to the rst threestates In these cases only one column of the matrix shows signicant contributions meaning that the excited electronis localized on one of the ligands The excitation hole always has its strongest contribution on Ir (46) the secondcontribution (22) is of LLCT type (Li rarrLj i j) and only the third contribution (14ndash15) is of IL type (Li rarrLi )

While the plots shown in Figure 3 provide a compact and rigorous representation of the excitations it is oftenconvenient to further compress the information For this purpose for each state partial sums are computed over allthe contributions that correspond to one of the ve classes of TMC excited states MC MLCT LMCT IL and LLCTHere the IrrarrIr matrix element gives the MC contribution to the state the sum of the IrrarrLi elements gives theMLCT contribution and so on This generic partitioning of the charge transfer number matrix is shown in Figure 4It can be applied to homoleptic complexes or more generally to TMCs where all ligands are treated as equivalentInstead of plotting the whole matrix of ΩI

AB it is now possible to identify one or two dominant contributions andrepresent them in tabular form Naturally the downside of this compression is that some information is lostmdashin thiscase the information about excitation localization on the individual ligands Hence one should carefully decide onthe degree of data compression depending on the application

For the six triplets of [Ir(ppy)3] the results of this analysis are shown in Table 2 It can be readily seen that thesix states form two strongly related sets of states T1 T2 and T3 have almost identical state character contributionsand the three other states likewise Furthermore it can be argued that the obtained numeric values provide moreinsight than that gained above from the NTOs Accordingly it can be seen that the three lowest-lying triplet statesare predominantly ligand-centered with around 50 IL character and only around 35 MLCT In contrast the higherstates are of predominant MLCT (50) character and possess LLCT character as a secondary contribution (31)

The information contained in the table can also be depicted in compact form as shown in Figure 5 where theenergy is depicted with horizontal bars the main state character is indicated by the color of these horizontal barsand the contributions to the state character are shown in stacked bar plots The advantage of this gure is that it canbe easily scaled to a relatively large number of states by simply making the bars narrower For instance 30ndash50 statescan be depicted in a gure of similar size (as will be shown below) while a table conveying the same information for50 states would probably take more than half a page Moreover spotting trends or patterns within the table would bemuch more cumbersome than glancing at the colors of the gure

11

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

HolePo

sition

Electron Position

MC MLCT

LMCT(Ph)3

rarr(Ph)3

IL

IL

IL

LLCT

LLCT

Figure 4 Division of the charge transfer matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states

Table 2 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and most important state character contributions for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym State characterT1 289 A 49 IL 38 MLCTT2 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT3 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT4 317 A+E 49 MLCT 31 LLCTT5 317 A+E 50 MLCT 31 LLCTT6 317 A+E 50 MLCT 32 LLCT

In summary the presented protocol enables a completely automatized quantitative and reproducible assignmentof state characters in TMCs In Sections 41 to 45 we will show that the methodology can be applied benecially incases where a larger number of states are to be analyzed where detailed understanding of ligand eects is needed orto rationalize the eects of geometric modications

32 Charge transfer numbers for spin-mixed states

In TMCs SOC is very relevant due to the large nuclear charge of the metal atom SOC is often included in theelectronic Hamiltonian as a perturbation [41 113ndash116]

H el = HMCH + H SOC (19)

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6020406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

) LLCTILLMCTMLCTMC

29303132

E(e

V)

Figure 5 Decomposition of the charge transfer number matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

12

where HMCH is the molecular Coulomb Hamiltonian (MCH) [117] which contains the (scalar relativistic) kinetic energyand Coulomb potential energies of the electrons In practice one usually rst computes a number of eigenstatesof the MCH (ΨMCH also called spin-free states) eg singlets and triplets and subsequently evaluates the SOCmatrix elements within this set of states The spin-orbit-coupled states (or diagonal states) can then be obtained ina perturbative fashion by a diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix where the diagonal elements contain theenergies of the MCH states and the o-diagonal elements are the SOCs The approximation of this step is neglectingthe SOC matrix elements with all higher states not computed in the rst step The diagonalization of HMCHmdashwithelements HMCH

I J = 〈ΨMCHI |H el |ΨMCH

J 〉mdashcan be written as

Hdiag = UdaggerHMCHU (20)

where U is the eigenvector matrix of HMCH The matrix U allows reconstructing the wave function of the diagonalstate in terms of the MCH states

|Ψdiagα 〉 =

sumI

|ΨMCHI 〉UIα (21)

Assuming that the ground state Ψ0 is not aected by this transformation which is often a good approximation the1TDM between the ground state and an excited diagonal state is given by

T αr s =langΨ0

adaggerr as Ψdiagα

rang (22)

which after insertion of Equation (21) reads

T αr s =sumI

langΨ0

adaggerr as ΨMCHI

rangUIα =

sumI

T Ir sUIα (23)

Insertion into Equation (17) shows that the same relations also holds for the orthogonalized matrices ie

T αr s =sumI

T Ir sUIα (24)

and Equation (16) nally leads to

ΩαAB =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ α

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

T ImicroνT

Jmicroν =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ αΩIminusJAB (25)

Here the diagonal elements ΩIminusIAB are equivalent to the charge transfer numbers ΩI

AB of the MCH states as denedabove and the o-diagonal ΩIminusJ

AB terms are computed in an analogous fashion using the 1TDMs of two dierentstates Importantly the evaluation of Equation (25) does not require any signicant additional computational eortwhen compared to the MCH case since all required TI matrices are already available This transformation has beennewly implemented into TheoDORE in the course of this work and we will illustrate its potential below

In order to visualize the resulting data we rst consider a plot of the energies versus oscillator strengths Figure 6shows these two quantities for the lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] The spin-pure (singlet and triplet) states in theMCH representation are denoted by open rings and the spin-mixed states in the diagonal representation by lledcircles As the diagonal states do not have a well-dened total spin value we indicate the total spin expectation valueof these states by color Additionally we draw arrows between the MCH and diagonal states in such a way that it canbe discerned which MCH states contribute to which diagonal states In that way the plot can be used to analyze theelectronic structure of the diagonal states in a visual way At rst glance the complexity of the diagonal states can beappreciated ie in most cases the diagonal states are a linear combination of a large number of dierent MCH states

The reason to show energies versus oscillator strengths is that for [Ir(ppy)3] and related complexes the characterof the lowest diagonal triplet states (the sublevels of theT1) is decisive for its phosphorescence properties Ideally thelowest triplet sublevel should have signicant oscillator strength in order to facilitate fast and ecient phosphorescentdecay It has been shown by theoretical arguments [16 118] that for pseudo-octahedral complexes of trigonal

13

T1T23 T4minus6

S1

S23

X1

28 30 32 34 36

000

001

002

Energy (eV)

Osc

illat

orst

reng

th

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3

〈S2〉

Figure 6 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and oscillator strengths of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] in theMCH representation (open rings) and in the diagonal representation (lled circles) For each state the color indicates the spin multiplicitymdashredor blue for the spin-pure MCH states or any intermediate color for the spin-mixed diagonal states The arrows indicate which MCH statescontribute to which diagonal states with the arrow thickness indicating the weight of the contributions X1 denotes the lowest diagonal state(TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

T1

T23

T4minus6

S1 S2

X1

28 30 32 34 3610

20

30

40

50

60

Energy (eV)

MLC

Tch

arac

ter

()

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3〈S

2〉

Figure 7 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and MLCT character of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] Themeaning of the colors and arrows is the same as in Figure 6 (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

symmetry the lowest triplet sublevel is forbidden from decaying radiatively while the higher sublevels are allowedto phosphoresce This result is recovered in our calculations as can be seen in Figure 6 where the lowest diagonalstate (labeled ldquoX1rdquo) has an oscillator strength of zero The plot also shows that some of the other sublevels of T1T2 and T3 indeed acquire small oscillator strengths Figure 6 also reveals that the intensity of these states does notoriginate from the lowest singlet states S1 minus S3 as one might have assumed initially but it actually derives from therelatively bright S4 and S5 state pair (not shown due to scale) A possible explanation for this nding is given bythe general properties of the spin-orbit operator which govern the magnitude of the SOCs [114] Accordingly ina TMC one can expect very large SOCs between a singlet I and a triplet J if the transition I rarr J is a one-electron

14

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

problem whose solutions are the poles of the response function This eigenvalue problem can be written as(A BB A

) (XI

YI

)= EI

(1 00 minus1

) (XI

YI

) (1)

Here the matrices A and B are called orbital rotation Hessians [87] and depend on orbital energy dierences andintegrals over the two-electron Coulomb and exchange operators Once a solution to (1) has been found in additionto the excitation energy EI one also obtains the response vector (XI YI ) This vector is similar to the CI vectorfrom a conguration interaction or multi-reference calculation The vector XI corresponds to excitations fromoccupied to virtual orbitals eg vector element X I

ia is the coecient corresponding to an excitation from an occupiedorbital i to a virtual orbital a The vector YI corresponds to ldquode-excitationsrdquo from virtual into occupied orbitalsThese de-excitations which follow from the derivation of LR TD-DFT equations do not possess a clear physicalmeaning [40] and are usually dismissed in the discussions Ignoring the de-excitations in equation (1) is known asthe Tamm-Damco approximation (TDA) [88]

AXI = EIXI (2)

The TDA is often applied in TD-DFT for computational eciency reasons as it replaces a non-Hermitian eigenvalueproblem by a Hermitian eigenvalue problem of half the size Even more it has been pointed out that the TDAsometimes leads to improved results by avoiding triplet instabilities for range-separated hybrid functionals [89] Forthese reasons we will restrict ourselves to the TDA in the following More information regarding wave functionanalysis for full TD-DFT can be found in Ref [90] and regarding mathematical considerations relevant to de-excitationsin Ref [91]

One of the complexes considered in this tutorial is [Ir(ppy)3] (ppy=2-phenylpyridyl) which is a strongly phospho-rescent compound used in OLED design [92] (for a more comprehensive introduction of this complex see Section 41)Its frontier orbitals ie the ones mainly involved in the low-lying excitations are depicted in Figure 1 The threehighest occupied orbitals (Ha He1 He2) are combinations of metal 5d orbitals and ligand π orbitals whereas the threelowest unoccupied orbitals (La Le1 Le2) are linear combinations of ligand π lowast orbitals with little metal contributionsThese frontier orbitals are characteristic for many pseudo-octahedral complexes with D3 or C3 symmetry [16] Notehowever that although our calculations used a symmetric geometry the calculations were performed withoutsymmetrymdashas is practiced often

In order to perform an analysis of the computed excited state the excitation vector XI is needed Most commonlythe excited states are analyzed by identifying the largest contributions X I

ia to the excitation vector By manualinspection the orbitals i and a are then assigned to some orbital classmdasheg metal-centered or ligand centered Thenif i is a metal-centered orbital and a is a ligand-centered orbital the electronic state is characterized as an MLCTstate In Table 1 we compile the excitation energies symmetries and leading excitations for the rst six triplet statesof [Ir(ppy)3] As can be seen the lowest six triplet states are very close in energy (within 03 eV) and due to thesymmetry of the molecule are grouped into (near-)degenerate sets of states The states T4 to T6 are actually so closein energy that it is not possible to identify which is the A state and which are the E states and are thus labeled as alinear combination of both Table 1 lists all the contributions with a weight |X I

ia |2 of at least 015 These contributionsrepresent at least 58 of each of the shown states and it is thus possible to provide a qualitative state assignmentbased on this table Because the occupied orbitals are mixed metal-ligand-centered and the virtual orbitals are mostlyligand-centered it can be said that the six triplet states all have mixed MLCT IL and LLCT character

Beyond this basic qualitative nding it is hard to gain further knowledge from the coecients in Table 1 It isdicult to discern any dierences between these six states as they are complicated linear combinations of dierentexcitations Moreover it is very hard to answer questions like ldquoAre the ligand-centered contributions combinationsof local excitations (IL) or charge transfer (LLCT) excitationsrdquo It is also not clear from Table 1 whether the statesshown are actually multi-congurational states or whether an orbital representation could be found where a singleconguration is sucient to describe one of the states

One of the basic problems of the above analysis is that when expressed in the basis of the canonical Kohn-Shamorbitals the excited states are often linear combinations of many dierent excitations with similar weightsmdashas

5

E

Ha

He1 He2

La

Le1 Le2

EA

AE

ndash575 eVndash560 eV

ndash175 eVndash162 eV

Figure 1 Depiction of the frontier canonical orbitals for [Ir(ppy)3] The gure also denes the orbital labels Ha He1 He2 for the highest occupiedorbitals and La Le1 Le2 for the lowest unoccupied orbitals (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water) see Appendix A for full computationaldetails)

Table 1 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and leading excitations with coecients Xia for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym Leading excitationsT1 289 A +085HaLa +032He1Le2 +032He2Le1T2 293 E +058HaLe1 +049HaLe2T3 293 E +058HaLe2 minus049HaLe1T4 317 A+E +048He1Le1 +044He2Le1 +041He1LaT5 317 A+E +056He2La +046He2Le2 minus042He2Le1T6 317 A+E minus056He1La +053He1Le2 +045HaLe2

exemplied in Table 1 In such a case the actual state character is determined by the (non-trivial) interferencepatterns between the excitations as visible by the dierent signs of the coecients in the table In order to simplifythe interpretation it is advantageous to seek an orbital representation which is more suitable to express the excitedstates in a simple and compact form Ideally this representation should also be method independent because thereare subtle dierences in the interpretation of eg canonical Kohn-Sham orbitals versus Hartree-Fock or CASSCForbitals and between the response vector from TD-DFT versus the conguration interaction vectors from wavefunction-based methods [40 93]

To this end in the following we will heavily use the one-electron transition density matrix (1TDM) TI J whoseelements in general can be dened as [71]

T I Jr s =

langΨI

adaggerr as ΨJ rang (3)

Here adaggerr is the creation operator for orbital ϕr as the annihilation operator for orbital ϕs and I and J are twoexcited state indices We will mostly consider transition density matrices between the ground state and an excited

6

state I which we write as TI Such a 1TDM is closely related to physical observables like the transition dipolemoment [71] showing that the 1TDM is a suitable basis for a more physically meaningful analysis of excited-statecharacter For methods which allow describing higher excitations (multi-reference quadratic response etc) therewill also be two-electron and higher transition density matrices but these contribute only little for states which arepredominantly described as single-excitations

In TD-DFT which employs a single-determinant ground state the 1TDM TI is directly related to the responsevector Within the TDA the following assignment is made

T Iia = X I

ia (4)

where i runs over the occupied orbitals and a over the virtual ones

With the 1TDM dened we can now introduce the concept of natural transition orbitals (NTOs) [70 94 95]These are obtained by a singular value decomposition of the 1TDM

TI = VIcopyshyshylaquoλI1

λI2

ordfregregnotWIdagger (5)

Analogously it can be stated that the unitary matrices VI and WI contain the eigenvectors of the hole and particledensity matrices (TITIdagger and TIdaggerTI respectively) [71] From the matrix VI one can construct the NTOs of the excitationhole by summing over the appropriate occupied orbitals

ψ h Ip (r) =

sumi isinocc

V Iipϕi (r) (6)

and from the matrix WI the NTOs of the excited electron by summing over the virtual orbitals

ψ e Ip (r) =

sumaisinvirt

W Iapϕa(r) (7)

The value (λIp )2 then gives the weight of the excitationψ h Ip rarr ψ e I

p in the excited state I The strength of the NTOtransformation is that usually only a few (λIp )2 are signicantly larger than zero and by considering only those fewexcitations a very compact representation for the excited state can be obtained The number of signicant NTOscontributing to a given state can be quantied by the NTO participation ratio (PR) [70]

PRINTO =

(sump (λIp )2

)2sump (λIp )4

(8)

which is a measure of how many single-particle excitations are necessary to describe a state and thus its multi-congurational character This value is always greater or equal to one PRNTO has an important practical implicationie it shows how many orbitals should be visualized More importantly the number of non-vanishing NTOamplitudes have a clear physical meaning that can be interpreted in the context of static electron correlation [96]exciton formation [70 97] and entanglement between the electron and hole quasiparticles [98] The PRNTO value hasbeen applied practically to quantify charge resonance interactions during excimer formation of organic molecules[70 99] and to understand the intermediate states involved in two-photon absorption [100]

In Figure 2 we plot the most important NTOs for the six triplet states discussed above The NTOs represent theexcitations more compactly than the canonical orbitals did as can be seen from the sums of weights Indeed for allstates the shown NTOs represent at least 90 which is much better than the 58 represented in Table 1 Whereaseach individual state can be represented with few NTO pairs it is now necessary to plot (generally dierent) NTOsfor each state so that a large number of NTOs will be needed to represent a large set of excited states

7

074 012 012

T1 289 eV (173)

067 031

T2 293 eV (182)

070 020

T3 293 eV (181)

094

T4 317 eV (111)

091

T5 317 eV (117)

093

T6 317 eV (113)

Figure 2 Depiction of the leading NTO pairs for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] with the weights of the NTO pairs given above the arrowsThe labels under each set of NTOs indicates the shown state the excitation energy and the PRNTO in parenthesis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

The analysis of the NTOs in Figure 2 allows obtaining qualitative insight into the state characters beyond theinsight gained from Table 1 First PRNTO allows judging the multi-congurational character of the states showingthat the rst three triplets are indeed multi-congurationalmdashas could be anticipated above On the contrary T4T5 and T6 are identied as virtually single-congurational statesmdasha fact that could hardly be expected from thecanonical orbital representation Moreover in the NTO basis we can qualitatively distinguish between IL and LLCTtransitions T1T2 andT3 seem to mostly involve local IL excitations besides the MLCT character This is unexpectedsince in the canonical representation T2 and T3 were mixtures of excitations from the Ha orbital which is fullydelocalized The higher triplets constitute a set of LLCT statesmdashagain with some MLCT admixturemdashwhere theelectron is excited counterclockwise (in the used orientation and for the employed enantiomer of [Ir(ppy)3]) fromone ligand to another one Hence the six triplet states can be described as a set of three MLCTIL states and threehigher-energy LLCTMLCT states

On a side note T4 T5 and T6 do not reect the proper symmetry of the molecule because our calculation did notconsider explicit symmetry This symmetry breaking can be explained by the fact that the three states are nearlydegenerate and therefore can mix Now apparently the computation converged to three states where the excitationsare clearly localized Oppositely one can expect that the properly symmetrized states would be more delocalizedforming one A state which is a positive linear combination of the three states and a pair of E states Neverthelessthese symmetrized states would still retain their counterclockwise CT characters even though this might not beimmediately visible in the NTO representation of the symmetrized states This discussion shows that in this complexthe states have a tendency to easily break symmetry

Whereas the NTOs contain the full information of the initial TDA computation there are also ways to reducethis information and represent the excitation in an even more compact way A weighted sum of the electron and holeNTOs leads to the electron and hole densities [71]

ρIh(r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ h Ip (r)

)2(9)

ρIe (r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ e Ip (r)

)2(10)

also termed (unrelaxed) attachment and detachment densities [101] The dierence between these two leads to the

8

unrelaxed dierence densityρIdi (r) = ρIh(r) minus ρIe (r) (11)

while the sumρIspin(r) = ρIh(r) + ρIe (r) (12)

corresponds to the spin-density in a high-spin triplet computation

If one goes beyond the TDA eg with full TD-DFT wave function based methods or by including orbitalrelaxations as present in the theory of analytical energy gradients [102] these simple rules connecting the NTOswith the dierence and spin densities no longer apply and a wealth of new information can be extracted from thedeviations of these quantities provided suitable analysis methods are chosen [71] In particular a comparison of theNTOs with the eigenvectors of the relaxed dierence density matrixmdashtermed natural dierence orbitalsmdashproved to bevery useful for analyzing secondary orbital relaxation eects accompanying the main excitation process [103] It wasshown that these eects were particularly pronounced for the MLCT states of a small model iridium complex wherethe occupied d-orbitals contracted after one electron was removed [81]

3 Quantication of excited state localization and charge transfer

In the following section we show how it is possible to identify state characters based on the computation ofdescriptors while avoiding entirely the visual inspection of orbitals As alluded to in the introduction a numericalcharacterization of excited states promises several advantages it allows avoiding laborious manual work and can beautomatized for a large number of excited states it is objective reproducible and more precise it allows spottingsmall dierences trends or continuous changes and nally can reveal physics which cannot be represented throughorbital pictures

One such descriptor the PRNTO value of equation (8) was already introduced above In the following we willintroduce another kind of descriptor the charge transfer number [70 104] which will be our main tool for theremainder of the text The following subsections will rst generally outline the underlying theory and show examplesfor the most common case of non-relativistic (or scalar relativistic) wave functions Subsequently we will presentthe rst application of the same methodology to spin-orbit coupled relativistic states Finally motivated by the factthat in certain situations the dierent computed charge transfer numbers are strongly correlated we present a novelclustering ansatz which allows automatically dividing a molecule into chromophoric subunits

31 Charge transfer numbers

Excited states are usually discussed in terms of where the excitation originatesmdashie where the excitation hole islocalizedmdashand where it goes tomdashie where the excited electron is localized For example the excitation in an MLCTstate originates at a metal orbital and goes to one or more ligands an IL state originates at a ligand and goes to adierent orbital at the same ligand The purpose of the charge transfer numbers is to formalize this concept Againthe 1TDM TI is considered as the central object but instead of visualizing it we partition it among dierent fragmentsof the molecular system under study Mathematically speaking the fragments are mutually disjoint subsets of theatoms of the molecule Usually the fragments are dened by chemical intuition eg each ligand of a complex istreated as a separate fragment but later on we will also discuss strategies for automatic fragmentation

The rst step is a transformation of the 1TDM from the MO basis to the atomic orbital (AO) basis

TI = CTICT (13)

where C is the MO-coecient matrix The square of an element of this matrix (T Imicroν )2 measures the contribution

of an excitation originating on the atomic orbital (AO) χmicro and going to the AO χν The charge transfer numberΩIAB is now intended to measure the total contributions of excitations that originate at any AO centered on an atom

of fragment A and go to any AO on fragment B In a naive implementation one could simply sum over all (T Imicroν )2

9

elements where micro lies on A and ν lies on B However for a rigorous computation it is necessary to apply a populationanalysis scheme that takes into account the non-orthogonality of the AOs There is no unique way of dividing thedensity among atoms and a number of dierent population analysis schemes have been devised [105] Two suchanalysis schemes were adapted for analyzing the 1TDM [71 106] and implemented in TheoDORE First it is possible[71] to partition the 1TDM in the spirit of a Mulliken analysis

ΩIAB =

12

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

[(TI S)microν (STI )microν + T I

microν (STI S)microν] (14)

where S is the AO overlap matrix yielding an equation that is related to Mayerrsquos bond order [107] Alternatively aLoumlwdin orthogonalization can be applied to TI [106] leading to the orthogonal matrix

TI = S12TI S12 (15)

which can be directly used for summation

ΩIAB =

summicro isinA

sumν isinB(T Imicroν )2 (16)

In the implementation used here the Loumlwdin orthogonalization proceeds by using the following identity

TI = S12TI S12 = (PQT)TI (PQT)T (17)

where P and Q are the matrices containing the left and right singular vectors of the MO-coecient matrix C It isthus possible to evaluate Equation (16) without knowledge of the AO overlap matrix S and a similar consideration[70] also applies for Equation (14) Whereas Equation (14) was initially implemented in TheoDORE it is advisable torather apply the Loumlwdin style partitioning of Equation (16) since it is computationally more ecient and in mostcases numerically more stable (ie the ΩI

AB values are strictly positive which is not necessarily the case for theMulliken partitioning) It is in principle possible to extend this formalism to other more involved population analysisschemes but this has not been attempted yet

Finally the quantityΩI =

sumAB

ΩIAB =

sumr s

(T Ir s )2 =

sump

(λIp )2 (18)

which is equivalent to the Frobenius norm of T (or T) can be dened [71 108] In the case of a normalized CISor TDA wave function this value is always equal to 1 whereas it is generally less than 1 for correlated ab initiomethods [103 109] In the latter case the ΩI value can be applied as a method-independent measure for the single-excitation character where ΩI = 1 corresponds to a pure singly excited state and smaller values indicate contributionsfrom double or higher excitations The physical meaning of ΩI is that it allows making some statements abouttransition properties of one-electron operators [108] Specically from ΩI = 0 it follows that 〈Ψ0 |O (1) |ΨI 〉 = 0 forany possible one-electron operator O (1) for example the dipole moment operator or a spin-orbit operator in a meaneld approximation

For a system of nfrag fragments the charge transfer number analysis produces an nfrag times nfrag matrix with allthe possible contributions Here the diagonal elements ΩI

AA correspond to local excitations on fragment A whileΩIAB A B are charge transfer contributions The matrix elements ΩI

AB can be directly plotted in the form of atwo-dimensional matrix plot (sometimes called electron-hole pair correlation plot) as has been discussed for examplein Refs [79 110ndash112]

Such matrix plots are shown in Figure 3 for the T1 minusT6 states of [Ir(ppy)3] denoting the three ppy ligands asL1 L2 and L3 Starting with the T1 state (Figure 3a) it is observed that the three strongest contributions (16 each)are situated on the diagonal corresponding to local excitations on each of the three ligands In addition threecontributions (13 each) are seen corresponding to IrrarrL excitations The same types of transitions are also presentfor theT2 andT3 (Figure 3b-c) states with the exception that the symmetry is broken and the ligands do not contribute

10

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

1 13 13 13

0 16 2 2

0 2 16 2

0 2 2 16

(a) T1 (289 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 19 1 16

1 29 0 2

0 2 0 2

1 2 0 24

(b) T2 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 5 23 8

0 7 2 1

1 1 35 1

1 1 3 11

(c) T3 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3Ir

L1L2

L32 1 2 46

1 0 1 22

0 0 1 7

1 0 0 15

(d) T4 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 3 45 2

0 1 6 0

1 1 14 1

1 1 22 0

(e) T5 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 46 3 1

0 14 1 1

1 22 1 1

0 7 1 0

(f) T6 (317 eV)

Figure 3 Matrix plots of the charge transfer numbers for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] In the plots the magnitude of the elements of the4 times 4 matrices are given by the color the numbers give the numerical value (in ) The labels L1 L2 and L3 denote the three ppy ligands Theexcitation hole is plotted on the vertical axis the excited electron on the horizontal axis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

equally to these states The states T4 to T6 (Figures 3d-f) show distinctly dierent plots as opposed to the rst threestates In these cases only one column of the matrix shows signicant contributions meaning that the excited electronis localized on one of the ligands The excitation hole always has its strongest contribution on Ir (46) the secondcontribution (22) is of LLCT type (Li rarrLj i j) and only the third contribution (14ndash15) is of IL type (Li rarrLi )

While the plots shown in Figure 3 provide a compact and rigorous representation of the excitations it is oftenconvenient to further compress the information For this purpose for each state partial sums are computed over allthe contributions that correspond to one of the ve classes of TMC excited states MC MLCT LMCT IL and LLCTHere the IrrarrIr matrix element gives the MC contribution to the state the sum of the IrrarrLi elements gives theMLCT contribution and so on This generic partitioning of the charge transfer number matrix is shown in Figure 4It can be applied to homoleptic complexes or more generally to TMCs where all ligands are treated as equivalentInstead of plotting the whole matrix of ΩI

AB it is now possible to identify one or two dominant contributions andrepresent them in tabular form Naturally the downside of this compression is that some information is lostmdashin thiscase the information about excitation localization on the individual ligands Hence one should carefully decide onthe degree of data compression depending on the application

For the six triplets of [Ir(ppy)3] the results of this analysis are shown in Table 2 It can be readily seen that thesix states form two strongly related sets of states T1 T2 and T3 have almost identical state character contributionsand the three other states likewise Furthermore it can be argued that the obtained numeric values provide moreinsight than that gained above from the NTOs Accordingly it can be seen that the three lowest-lying triplet statesare predominantly ligand-centered with around 50 IL character and only around 35 MLCT In contrast the higherstates are of predominant MLCT (50) character and possess LLCT character as a secondary contribution (31)

The information contained in the table can also be depicted in compact form as shown in Figure 5 where theenergy is depicted with horizontal bars the main state character is indicated by the color of these horizontal barsand the contributions to the state character are shown in stacked bar plots The advantage of this gure is that it canbe easily scaled to a relatively large number of states by simply making the bars narrower For instance 30ndash50 statescan be depicted in a gure of similar size (as will be shown below) while a table conveying the same information for50 states would probably take more than half a page Moreover spotting trends or patterns within the table would bemuch more cumbersome than glancing at the colors of the gure

11

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

HolePo

sition

Electron Position

MC MLCT

LMCT(Ph)3

rarr(Ph)3

IL

IL

IL

LLCT

LLCT

Figure 4 Division of the charge transfer matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states

Table 2 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and most important state character contributions for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym State characterT1 289 A 49 IL 38 MLCTT2 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT3 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT4 317 A+E 49 MLCT 31 LLCTT5 317 A+E 50 MLCT 31 LLCTT6 317 A+E 50 MLCT 32 LLCT

In summary the presented protocol enables a completely automatized quantitative and reproducible assignmentof state characters in TMCs In Sections 41 to 45 we will show that the methodology can be applied benecially incases where a larger number of states are to be analyzed where detailed understanding of ligand eects is needed orto rationalize the eects of geometric modications

32 Charge transfer numbers for spin-mixed states

In TMCs SOC is very relevant due to the large nuclear charge of the metal atom SOC is often included in theelectronic Hamiltonian as a perturbation [41 113ndash116]

H el = HMCH + H SOC (19)

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6020406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

) LLCTILLMCTMLCTMC

29303132

E(e

V)

Figure 5 Decomposition of the charge transfer number matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

12

where HMCH is the molecular Coulomb Hamiltonian (MCH) [117] which contains the (scalar relativistic) kinetic energyand Coulomb potential energies of the electrons In practice one usually rst computes a number of eigenstatesof the MCH (ΨMCH also called spin-free states) eg singlets and triplets and subsequently evaluates the SOCmatrix elements within this set of states The spin-orbit-coupled states (or diagonal states) can then be obtained ina perturbative fashion by a diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix where the diagonal elements contain theenergies of the MCH states and the o-diagonal elements are the SOCs The approximation of this step is neglectingthe SOC matrix elements with all higher states not computed in the rst step The diagonalization of HMCHmdashwithelements HMCH

I J = 〈ΨMCHI |H el |ΨMCH

J 〉mdashcan be written as

Hdiag = UdaggerHMCHU (20)

where U is the eigenvector matrix of HMCH The matrix U allows reconstructing the wave function of the diagonalstate in terms of the MCH states

|Ψdiagα 〉 =

sumI

|ΨMCHI 〉UIα (21)

Assuming that the ground state Ψ0 is not aected by this transformation which is often a good approximation the1TDM between the ground state and an excited diagonal state is given by

T αr s =langΨ0

adaggerr as Ψdiagα

rang (22)

which after insertion of Equation (21) reads

T αr s =sumI

langΨ0

adaggerr as ΨMCHI

rangUIα =

sumI

T Ir sUIα (23)

Insertion into Equation (17) shows that the same relations also holds for the orthogonalized matrices ie

T αr s =sumI

T Ir sUIα (24)

and Equation (16) nally leads to

ΩαAB =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ α

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

T ImicroνT

Jmicroν =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ αΩIminusJAB (25)

Here the diagonal elements ΩIminusIAB are equivalent to the charge transfer numbers ΩI

AB of the MCH states as denedabove and the o-diagonal ΩIminusJ

AB terms are computed in an analogous fashion using the 1TDMs of two dierentstates Importantly the evaluation of Equation (25) does not require any signicant additional computational eortwhen compared to the MCH case since all required TI matrices are already available This transformation has beennewly implemented into TheoDORE in the course of this work and we will illustrate its potential below

In order to visualize the resulting data we rst consider a plot of the energies versus oscillator strengths Figure 6shows these two quantities for the lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] The spin-pure (singlet and triplet) states in theMCH representation are denoted by open rings and the spin-mixed states in the diagonal representation by lledcircles As the diagonal states do not have a well-dened total spin value we indicate the total spin expectation valueof these states by color Additionally we draw arrows between the MCH and diagonal states in such a way that it canbe discerned which MCH states contribute to which diagonal states In that way the plot can be used to analyze theelectronic structure of the diagonal states in a visual way At rst glance the complexity of the diagonal states can beappreciated ie in most cases the diagonal states are a linear combination of a large number of dierent MCH states

The reason to show energies versus oscillator strengths is that for [Ir(ppy)3] and related complexes the characterof the lowest diagonal triplet states (the sublevels of theT1) is decisive for its phosphorescence properties Ideally thelowest triplet sublevel should have signicant oscillator strength in order to facilitate fast and ecient phosphorescentdecay It has been shown by theoretical arguments [16 118] that for pseudo-octahedral complexes of trigonal

13

T1T23 T4minus6

S1

S23

X1

28 30 32 34 36

000

001

002

Energy (eV)

Osc

illat

orst

reng

th

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3

〈S2〉

Figure 6 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and oscillator strengths of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] in theMCH representation (open rings) and in the diagonal representation (lled circles) For each state the color indicates the spin multiplicitymdashredor blue for the spin-pure MCH states or any intermediate color for the spin-mixed diagonal states The arrows indicate which MCH statescontribute to which diagonal states with the arrow thickness indicating the weight of the contributions X1 denotes the lowest diagonal state(TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

T1

T23

T4minus6

S1 S2

X1

28 30 32 34 3610

20

30

40

50

60

Energy (eV)

MLC

Tch

arac

ter

()

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3〈S

2〉

Figure 7 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and MLCT character of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] Themeaning of the colors and arrows is the same as in Figure 6 (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

symmetry the lowest triplet sublevel is forbidden from decaying radiatively while the higher sublevels are allowedto phosphoresce This result is recovered in our calculations as can be seen in Figure 6 where the lowest diagonalstate (labeled ldquoX1rdquo) has an oscillator strength of zero The plot also shows that some of the other sublevels of T1T2 and T3 indeed acquire small oscillator strengths Figure 6 also reveals that the intensity of these states does notoriginate from the lowest singlet states S1 minus S3 as one might have assumed initially but it actually derives from therelatively bright S4 and S5 state pair (not shown due to scale) A possible explanation for this nding is given bythe general properties of the spin-orbit operator which govern the magnitude of the SOCs [114] Accordingly ina TMC one can expect very large SOCs between a singlet I and a triplet J if the transition I rarr J is a one-electron

14

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

E

Ha

He1 He2

La

Le1 Le2

EA

AE

ndash575 eVndash560 eV

ndash175 eVndash162 eV

Figure 1 Depiction of the frontier canonical orbitals for [Ir(ppy)3] The gure also denes the orbital labels Ha He1 He2 for the highest occupiedorbitals and La Le1 Le2 for the lowest unoccupied orbitals (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water) see Appendix A for full computationaldetails)

Table 1 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and leading excitations with coecients Xia for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym Leading excitationsT1 289 A +085HaLa +032He1Le2 +032He2Le1T2 293 E +058HaLe1 +049HaLe2T3 293 E +058HaLe2 minus049HaLe1T4 317 A+E +048He1Le1 +044He2Le1 +041He1LaT5 317 A+E +056He2La +046He2Le2 minus042He2Le1T6 317 A+E minus056He1La +053He1Le2 +045HaLe2

exemplied in Table 1 In such a case the actual state character is determined by the (non-trivial) interferencepatterns between the excitations as visible by the dierent signs of the coecients in the table In order to simplifythe interpretation it is advantageous to seek an orbital representation which is more suitable to express the excitedstates in a simple and compact form Ideally this representation should also be method independent because thereare subtle dierences in the interpretation of eg canonical Kohn-Sham orbitals versus Hartree-Fock or CASSCForbitals and between the response vector from TD-DFT versus the conguration interaction vectors from wavefunction-based methods [40 93]

To this end in the following we will heavily use the one-electron transition density matrix (1TDM) TI J whoseelements in general can be dened as [71]

T I Jr s =

langΨI

adaggerr as ΨJ rang (3)

Here adaggerr is the creation operator for orbital ϕr as the annihilation operator for orbital ϕs and I and J are twoexcited state indices We will mostly consider transition density matrices between the ground state and an excited

6

state I which we write as TI Such a 1TDM is closely related to physical observables like the transition dipolemoment [71] showing that the 1TDM is a suitable basis for a more physically meaningful analysis of excited-statecharacter For methods which allow describing higher excitations (multi-reference quadratic response etc) therewill also be two-electron and higher transition density matrices but these contribute only little for states which arepredominantly described as single-excitations

In TD-DFT which employs a single-determinant ground state the 1TDM TI is directly related to the responsevector Within the TDA the following assignment is made

T Iia = X I

ia (4)

where i runs over the occupied orbitals and a over the virtual ones

With the 1TDM dened we can now introduce the concept of natural transition orbitals (NTOs) [70 94 95]These are obtained by a singular value decomposition of the 1TDM

TI = VIcopyshyshylaquoλI1

λI2

ordfregregnotWIdagger (5)

Analogously it can be stated that the unitary matrices VI and WI contain the eigenvectors of the hole and particledensity matrices (TITIdagger and TIdaggerTI respectively) [71] From the matrix VI one can construct the NTOs of the excitationhole by summing over the appropriate occupied orbitals

ψ h Ip (r) =

sumi isinocc

V Iipϕi (r) (6)

and from the matrix WI the NTOs of the excited electron by summing over the virtual orbitals

ψ e Ip (r) =

sumaisinvirt

W Iapϕa(r) (7)

The value (λIp )2 then gives the weight of the excitationψ h Ip rarr ψ e I

p in the excited state I The strength of the NTOtransformation is that usually only a few (λIp )2 are signicantly larger than zero and by considering only those fewexcitations a very compact representation for the excited state can be obtained The number of signicant NTOscontributing to a given state can be quantied by the NTO participation ratio (PR) [70]

PRINTO =

(sump (λIp )2

)2sump (λIp )4

(8)

which is a measure of how many single-particle excitations are necessary to describe a state and thus its multi-congurational character This value is always greater or equal to one PRNTO has an important practical implicationie it shows how many orbitals should be visualized More importantly the number of non-vanishing NTOamplitudes have a clear physical meaning that can be interpreted in the context of static electron correlation [96]exciton formation [70 97] and entanglement between the electron and hole quasiparticles [98] The PRNTO value hasbeen applied practically to quantify charge resonance interactions during excimer formation of organic molecules[70 99] and to understand the intermediate states involved in two-photon absorption [100]

In Figure 2 we plot the most important NTOs for the six triplet states discussed above The NTOs represent theexcitations more compactly than the canonical orbitals did as can be seen from the sums of weights Indeed for allstates the shown NTOs represent at least 90 which is much better than the 58 represented in Table 1 Whereaseach individual state can be represented with few NTO pairs it is now necessary to plot (generally dierent) NTOsfor each state so that a large number of NTOs will be needed to represent a large set of excited states

7

074 012 012

T1 289 eV (173)

067 031

T2 293 eV (182)

070 020

T3 293 eV (181)

094

T4 317 eV (111)

091

T5 317 eV (117)

093

T6 317 eV (113)

Figure 2 Depiction of the leading NTO pairs for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] with the weights of the NTO pairs given above the arrowsThe labels under each set of NTOs indicates the shown state the excitation energy and the PRNTO in parenthesis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

The analysis of the NTOs in Figure 2 allows obtaining qualitative insight into the state characters beyond theinsight gained from Table 1 First PRNTO allows judging the multi-congurational character of the states showingthat the rst three triplets are indeed multi-congurationalmdashas could be anticipated above On the contrary T4T5 and T6 are identied as virtually single-congurational statesmdasha fact that could hardly be expected from thecanonical orbital representation Moreover in the NTO basis we can qualitatively distinguish between IL and LLCTtransitions T1T2 andT3 seem to mostly involve local IL excitations besides the MLCT character This is unexpectedsince in the canonical representation T2 and T3 were mixtures of excitations from the Ha orbital which is fullydelocalized The higher triplets constitute a set of LLCT statesmdashagain with some MLCT admixturemdashwhere theelectron is excited counterclockwise (in the used orientation and for the employed enantiomer of [Ir(ppy)3]) fromone ligand to another one Hence the six triplet states can be described as a set of three MLCTIL states and threehigher-energy LLCTMLCT states

On a side note T4 T5 and T6 do not reect the proper symmetry of the molecule because our calculation did notconsider explicit symmetry This symmetry breaking can be explained by the fact that the three states are nearlydegenerate and therefore can mix Now apparently the computation converged to three states where the excitationsare clearly localized Oppositely one can expect that the properly symmetrized states would be more delocalizedforming one A state which is a positive linear combination of the three states and a pair of E states Neverthelessthese symmetrized states would still retain their counterclockwise CT characters even though this might not beimmediately visible in the NTO representation of the symmetrized states This discussion shows that in this complexthe states have a tendency to easily break symmetry

Whereas the NTOs contain the full information of the initial TDA computation there are also ways to reducethis information and represent the excitation in an even more compact way A weighted sum of the electron and holeNTOs leads to the electron and hole densities [71]

ρIh(r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ h Ip (r)

)2(9)

ρIe (r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ e Ip (r)

)2(10)

also termed (unrelaxed) attachment and detachment densities [101] The dierence between these two leads to the

8

unrelaxed dierence densityρIdi (r) = ρIh(r) minus ρIe (r) (11)

while the sumρIspin(r) = ρIh(r) + ρIe (r) (12)

corresponds to the spin-density in a high-spin triplet computation

If one goes beyond the TDA eg with full TD-DFT wave function based methods or by including orbitalrelaxations as present in the theory of analytical energy gradients [102] these simple rules connecting the NTOswith the dierence and spin densities no longer apply and a wealth of new information can be extracted from thedeviations of these quantities provided suitable analysis methods are chosen [71] In particular a comparison of theNTOs with the eigenvectors of the relaxed dierence density matrixmdashtermed natural dierence orbitalsmdashproved to bevery useful for analyzing secondary orbital relaxation eects accompanying the main excitation process [103] It wasshown that these eects were particularly pronounced for the MLCT states of a small model iridium complex wherethe occupied d-orbitals contracted after one electron was removed [81]

3 Quantication of excited state localization and charge transfer

In the following section we show how it is possible to identify state characters based on the computation ofdescriptors while avoiding entirely the visual inspection of orbitals As alluded to in the introduction a numericalcharacterization of excited states promises several advantages it allows avoiding laborious manual work and can beautomatized for a large number of excited states it is objective reproducible and more precise it allows spottingsmall dierences trends or continuous changes and nally can reveal physics which cannot be represented throughorbital pictures

One such descriptor the PRNTO value of equation (8) was already introduced above In the following we willintroduce another kind of descriptor the charge transfer number [70 104] which will be our main tool for theremainder of the text The following subsections will rst generally outline the underlying theory and show examplesfor the most common case of non-relativistic (or scalar relativistic) wave functions Subsequently we will presentthe rst application of the same methodology to spin-orbit coupled relativistic states Finally motivated by the factthat in certain situations the dierent computed charge transfer numbers are strongly correlated we present a novelclustering ansatz which allows automatically dividing a molecule into chromophoric subunits

31 Charge transfer numbers

Excited states are usually discussed in terms of where the excitation originatesmdashie where the excitation hole islocalizedmdashand where it goes tomdashie where the excited electron is localized For example the excitation in an MLCTstate originates at a metal orbital and goes to one or more ligands an IL state originates at a ligand and goes to adierent orbital at the same ligand The purpose of the charge transfer numbers is to formalize this concept Againthe 1TDM TI is considered as the central object but instead of visualizing it we partition it among dierent fragmentsof the molecular system under study Mathematically speaking the fragments are mutually disjoint subsets of theatoms of the molecule Usually the fragments are dened by chemical intuition eg each ligand of a complex istreated as a separate fragment but later on we will also discuss strategies for automatic fragmentation

The rst step is a transformation of the 1TDM from the MO basis to the atomic orbital (AO) basis

TI = CTICT (13)

where C is the MO-coecient matrix The square of an element of this matrix (T Imicroν )2 measures the contribution

of an excitation originating on the atomic orbital (AO) χmicro and going to the AO χν The charge transfer numberΩIAB is now intended to measure the total contributions of excitations that originate at any AO centered on an atom

of fragment A and go to any AO on fragment B In a naive implementation one could simply sum over all (T Imicroν )2

9

elements where micro lies on A and ν lies on B However for a rigorous computation it is necessary to apply a populationanalysis scheme that takes into account the non-orthogonality of the AOs There is no unique way of dividing thedensity among atoms and a number of dierent population analysis schemes have been devised [105] Two suchanalysis schemes were adapted for analyzing the 1TDM [71 106] and implemented in TheoDORE First it is possible[71] to partition the 1TDM in the spirit of a Mulliken analysis

ΩIAB =

12

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

[(TI S)microν (STI )microν + T I

microν (STI S)microν] (14)

where S is the AO overlap matrix yielding an equation that is related to Mayerrsquos bond order [107] Alternatively aLoumlwdin orthogonalization can be applied to TI [106] leading to the orthogonal matrix

TI = S12TI S12 (15)

which can be directly used for summation

ΩIAB =

summicro isinA

sumν isinB(T Imicroν )2 (16)

In the implementation used here the Loumlwdin orthogonalization proceeds by using the following identity

TI = S12TI S12 = (PQT)TI (PQT)T (17)

where P and Q are the matrices containing the left and right singular vectors of the MO-coecient matrix C It isthus possible to evaluate Equation (16) without knowledge of the AO overlap matrix S and a similar consideration[70] also applies for Equation (14) Whereas Equation (14) was initially implemented in TheoDORE it is advisable torather apply the Loumlwdin style partitioning of Equation (16) since it is computationally more ecient and in mostcases numerically more stable (ie the ΩI

AB values are strictly positive which is not necessarily the case for theMulliken partitioning) It is in principle possible to extend this formalism to other more involved population analysisschemes but this has not been attempted yet

Finally the quantityΩI =

sumAB

ΩIAB =

sumr s

(T Ir s )2 =

sump

(λIp )2 (18)

which is equivalent to the Frobenius norm of T (or T) can be dened [71 108] In the case of a normalized CISor TDA wave function this value is always equal to 1 whereas it is generally less than 1 for correlated ab initiomethods [103 109] In the latter case the ΩI value can be applied as a method-independent measure for the single-excitation character where ΩI = 1 corresponds to a pure singly excited state and smaller values indicate contributionsfrom double or higher excitations The physical meaning of ΩI is that it allows making some statements abouttransition properties of one-electron operators [108] Specically from ΩI = 0 it follows that 〈Ψ0 |O (1) |ΨI 〉 = 0 forany possible one-electron operator O (1) for example the dipole moment operator or a spin-orbit operator in a meaneld approximation

For a system of nfrag fragments the charge transfer number analysis produces an nfrag times nfrag matrix with allthe possible contributions Here the diagonal elements ΩI

AA correspond to local excitations on fragment A whileΩIAB A B are charge transfer contributions The matrix elements ΩI

AB can be directly plotted in the form of atwo-dimensional matrix plot (sometimes called electron-hole pair correlation plot) as has been discussed for examplein Refs [79 110ndash112]

Such matrix plots are shown in Figure 3 for the T1 minusT6 states of [Ir(ppy)3] denoting the three ppy ligands asL1 L2 and L3 Starting with the T1 state (Figure 3a) it is observed that the three strongest contributions (16 each)are situated on the diagonal corresponding to local excitations on each of the three ligands In addition threecontributions (13 each) are seen corresponding to IrrarrL excitations The same types of transitions are also presentfor theT2 andT3 (Figure 3b-c) states with the exception that the symmetry is broken and the ligands do not contribute

10

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

1 13 13 13

0 16 2 2

0 2 16 2

0 2 2 16

(a) T1 (289 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 19 1 16

1 29 0 2

0 2 0 2

1 2 0 24

(b) T2 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 5 23 8

0 7 2 1

1 1 35 1

1 1 3 11

(c) T3 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3Ir

L1L2

L32 1 2 46

1 0 1 22

0 0 1 7

1 0 0 15

(d) T4 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 3 45 2

0 1 6 0

1 1 14 1

1 1 22 0

(e) T5 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 46 3 1

0 14 1 1

1 22 1 1

0 7 1 0

(f) T6 (317 eV)

Figure 3 Matrix plots of the charge transfer numbers for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] In the plots the magnitude of the elements of the4 times 4 matrices are given by the color the numbers give the numerical value (in ) The labels L1 L2 and L3 denote the three ppy ligands Theexcitation hole is plotted on the vertical axis the excited electron on the horizontal axis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

equally to these states The states T4 to T6 (Figures 3d-f) show distinctly dierent plots as opposed to the rst threestates In these cases only one column of the matrix shows signicant contributions meaning that the excited electronis localized on one of the ligands The excitation hole always has its strongest contribution on Ir (46) the secondcontribution (22) is of LLCT type (Li rarrLj i j) and only the third contribution (14ndash15) is of IL type (Li rarrLi )

While the plots shown in Figure 3 provide a compact and rigorous representation of the excitations it is oftenconvenient to further compress the information For this purpose for each state partial sums are computed over allthe contributions that correspond to one of the ve classes of TMC excited states MC MLCT LMCT IL and LLCTHere the IrrarrIr matrix element gives the MC contribution to the state the sum of the IrrarrLi elements gives theMLCT contribution and so on This generic partitioning of the charge transfer number matrix is shown in Figure 4It can be applied to homoleptic complexes or more generally to TMCs where all ligands are treated as equivalentInstead of plotting the whole matrix of ΩI

AB it is now possible to identify one or two dominant contributions andrepresent them in tabular form Naturally the downside of this compression is that some information is lostmdashin thiscase the information about excitation localization on the individual ligands Hence one should carefully decide onthe degree of data compression depending on the application

For the six triplets of [Ir(ppy)3] the results of this analysis are shown in Table 2 It can be readily seen that thesix states form two strongly related sets of states T1 T2 and T3 have almost identical state character contributionsand the three other states likewise Furthermore it can be argued that the obtained numeric values provide moreinsight than that gained above from the NTOs Accordingly it can be seen that the three lowest-lying triplet statesare predominantly ligand-centered with around 50 IL character and only around 35 MLCT In contrast the higherstates are of predominant MLCT (50) character and possess LLCT character as a secondary contribution (31)

The information contained in the table can also be depicted in compact form as shown in Figure 5 where theenergy is depicted with horizontal bars the main state character is indicated by the color of these horizontal barsand the contributions to the state character are shown in stacked bar plots The advantage of this gure is that it canbe easily scaled to a relatively large number of states by simply making the bars narrower For instance 30ndash50 statescan be depicted in a gure of similar size (as will be shown below) while a table conveying the same information for50 states would probably take more than half a page Moreover spotting trends or patterns within the table would bemuch more cumbersome than glancing at the colors of the gure

11

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

HolePo

sition

Electron Position

MC MLCT

LMCT(Ph)3

rarr(Ph)3

IL

IL

IL

LLCT

LLCT

Figure 4 Division of the charge transfer matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states

Table 2 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and most important state character contributions for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym State characterT1 289 A 49 IL 38 MLCTT2 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT3 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT4 317 A+E 49 MLCT 31 LLCTT5 317 A+E 50 MLCT 31 LLCTT6 317 A+E 50 MLCT 32 LLCT

In summary the presented protocol enables a completely automatized quantitative and reproducible assignmentof state characters in TMCs In Sections 41 to 45 we will show that the methodology can be applied benecially incases where a larger number of states are to be analyzed where detailed understanding of ligand eects is needed orto rationalize the eects of geometric modications

32 Charge transfer numbers for spin-mixed states

In TMCs SOC is very relevant due to the large nuclear charge of the metal atom SOC is often included in theelectronic Hamiltonian as a perturbation [41 113ndash116]

H el = HMCH + H SOC (19)

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6020406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

) LLCTILLMCTMLCTMC

29303132

E(e

V)

Figure 5 Decomposition of the charge transfer number matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

12

where HMCH is the molecular Coulomb Hamiltonian (MCH) [117] which contains the (scalar relativistic) kinetic energyand Coulomb potential energies of the electrons In practice one usually rst computes a number of eigenstatesof the MCH (ΨMCH also called spin-free states) eg singlets and triplets and subsequently evaluates the SOCmatrix elements within this set of states The spin-orbit-coupled states (or diagonal states) can then be obtained ina perturbative fashion by a diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix where the diagonal elements contain theenergies of the MCH states and the o-diagonal elements are the SOCs The approximation of this step is neglectingthe SOC matrix elements with all higher states not computed in the rst step The diagonalization of HMCHmdashwithelements HMCH

I J = 〈ΨMCHI |H el |ΨMCH

J 〉mdashcan be written as

Hdiag = UdaggerHMCHU (20)

where U is the eigenvector matrix of HMCH The matrix U allows reconstructing the wave function of the diagonalstate in terms of the MCH states

|Ψdiagα 〉 =

sumI

|ΨMCHI 〉UIα (21)

Assuming that the ground state Ψ0 is not aected by this transformation which is often a good approximation the1TDM between the ground state and an excited diagonal state is given by

T αr s =langΨ0

adaggerr as Ψdiagα

rang (22)

which after insertion of Equation (21) reads

T αr s =sumI

langΨ0

adaggerr as ΨMCHI

rangUIα =

sumI

T Ir sUIα (23)

Insertion into Equation (17) shows that the same relations also holds for the orthogonalized matrices ie

T αr s =sumI

T Ir sUIα (24)

and Equation (16) nally leads to

ΩαAB =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ α

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

T ImicroνT

Jmicroν =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ αΩIminusJAB (25)

Here the diagonal elements ΩIminusIAB are equivalent to the charge transfer numbers ΩI

AB of the MCH states as denedabove and the o-diagonal ΩIminusJ

AB terms are computed in an analogous fashion using the 1TDMs of two dierentstates Importantly the evaluation of Equation (25) does not require any signicant additional computational eortwhen compared to the MCH case since all required TI matrices are already available This transformation has beennewly implemented into TheoDORE in the course of this work and we will illustrate its potential below

In order to visualize the resulting data we rst consider a plot of the energies versus oscillator strengths Figure 6shows these two quantities for the lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] The spin-pure (singlet and triplet) states in theMCH representation are denoted by open rings and the spin-mixed states in the diagonal representation by lledcircles As the diagonal states do not have a well-dened total spin value we indicate the total spin expectation valueof these states by color Additionally we draw arrows between the MCH and diagonal states in such a way that it canbe discerned which MCH states contribute to which diagonal states In that way the plot can be used to analyze theelectronic structure of the diagonal states in a visual way At rst glance the complexity of the diagonal states can beappreciated ie in most cases the diagonal states are a linear combination of a large number of dierent MCH states

The reason to show energies versus oscillator strengths is that for [Ir(ppy)3] and related complexes the characterof the lowest diagonal triplet states (the sublevels of theT1) is decisive for its phosphorescence properties Ideally thelowest triplet sublevel should have signicant oscillator strength in order to facilitate fast and ecient phosphorescentdecay It has been shown by theoretical arguments [16 118] that for pseudo-octahedral complexes of trigonal

13

T1T23 T4minus6

S1

S23

X1

28 30 32 34 36

000

001

002

Energy (eV)

Osc

illat

orst

reng

th

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3

〈S2〉

Figure 6 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and oscillator strengths of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] in theMCH representation (open rings) and in the diagonal representation (lled circles) For each state the color indicates the spin multiplicitymdashredor blue for the spin-pure MCH states or any intermediate color for the spin-mixed diagonal states The arrows indicate which MCH statescontribute to which diagonal states with the arrow thickness indicating the weight of the contributions X1 denotes the lowest diagonal state(TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

T1

T23

T4minus6

S1 S2

X1

28 30 32 34 3610

20

30

40

50

60

Energy (eV)

MLC

Tch

arac

ter

()

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3〈S

2〉

Figure 7 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and MLCT character of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] Themeaning of the colors and arrows is the same as in Figure 6 (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

symmetry the lowest triplet sublevel is forbidden from decaying radiatively while the higher sublevels are allowedto phosphoresce This result is recovered in our calculations as can be seen in Figure 6 where the lowest diagonalstate (labeled ldquoX1rdquo) has an oscillator strength of zero The plot also shows that some of the other sublevels of T1T2 and T3 indeed acquire small oscillator strengths Figure 6 also reveals that the intensity of these states does notoriginate from the lowest singlet states S1 minus S3 as one might have assumed initially but it actually derives from therelatively bright S4 and S5 state pair (not shown due to scale) A possible explanation for this nding is given bythe general properties of the spin-orbit operator which govern the magnitude of the SOCs [114] Accordingly ina TMC one can expect very large SOCs between a singlet I and a triplet J if the transition I rarr J is a one-electron

14

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

state I which we write as TI Such a 1TDM is closely related to physical observables like the transition dipolemoment [71] showing that the 1TDM is a suitable basis for a more physically meaningful analysis of excited-statecharacter For methods which allow describing higher excitations (multi-reference quadratic response etc) therewill also be two-electron and higher transition density matrices but these contribute only little for states which arepredominantly described as single-excitations

In TD-DFT which employs a single-determinant ground state the 1TDM TI is directly related to the responsevector Within the TDA the following assignment is made

T Iia = X I

ia (4)

where i runs over the occupied orbitals and a over the virtual ones

With the 1TDM dened we can now introduce the concept of natural transition orbitals (NTOs) [70 94 95]These are obtained by a singular value decomposition of the 1TDM

TI = VIcopyshyshylaquoλI1

λI2

ordfregregnotWIdagger (5)

Analogously it can be stated that the unitary matrices VI and WI contain the eigenvectors of the hole and particledensity matrices (TITIdagger and TIdaggerTI respectively) [71] From the matrix VI one can construct the NTOs of the excitationhole by summing over the appropriate occupied orbitals

ψ h Ip (r) =

sumi isinocc

V Iipϕi (r) (6)

and from the matrix WI the NTOs of the excited electron by summing over the virtual orbitals

ψ e Ip (r) =

sumaisinvirt

W Iapϕa(r) (7)

The value (λIp )2 then gives the weight of the excitationψ h Ip rarr ψ e I

p in the excited state I The strength of the NTOtransformation is that usually only a few (λIp )2 are signicantly larger than zero and by considering only those fewexcitations a very compact representation for the excited state can be obtained The number of signicant NTOscontributing to a given state can be quantied by the NTO participation ratio (PR) [70]

PRINTO =

(sump (λIp )2

)2sump (λIp )4

(8)

which is a measure of how many single-particle excitations are necessary to describe a state and thus its multi-congurational character This value is always greater or equal to one PRNTO has an important practical implicationie it shows how many orbitals should be visualized More importantly the number of non-vanishing NTOamplitudes have a clear physical meaning that can be interpreted in the context of static electron correlation [96]exciton formation [70 97] and entanglement between the electron and hole quasiparticles [98] The PRNTO value hasbeen applied practically to quantify charge resonance interactions during excimer formation of organic molecules[70 99] and to understand the intermediate states involved in two-photon absorption [100]

In Figure 2 we plot the most important NTOs for the six triplet states discussed above The NTOs represent theexcitations more compactly than the canonical orbitals did as can be seen from the sums of weights Indeed for allstates the shown NTOs represent at least 90 which is much better than the 58 represented in Table 1 Whereaseach individual state can be represented with few NTO pairs it is now necessary to plot (generally dierent) NTOsfor each state so that a large number of NTOs will be needed to represent a large set of excited states

7

074 012 012

T1 289 eV (173)

067 031

T2 293 eV (182)

070 020

T3 293 eV (181)

094

T4 317 eV (111)

091

T5 317 eV (117)

093

T6 317 eV (113)

Figure 2 Depiction of the leading NTO pairs for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] with the weights of the NTO pairs given above the arrowsThe labels under each set of NTOs indicates the shown state the excitation energy and the PRNTO in parenthesis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

The analysis of the NTOs in Figure 2 allows obtaining qualitative insight into the state characters beyond theinsight gained from Table 1 First PRNTO allows judging the multi-congurational character of the states showingthat the rst three triplets are indeed multi-congurationalmdashas could be anticipated above On the contrary T4T5 and T6 are identied as virtually single-congurational statesmdasha fact that could hardly be expected from thecanonical orbital representation Moreover in the NTO basis we can qualitatively distinguish between IL and LLCTtransitions T1T2 andT3 seem to mostly involve local IL excitations besides the MLCT character This is unexpectedsince in the canonical representation T2 and T3 were mixtures of excitations from the Ha orbital which is fullydelocalized The higher triplets constitute a set of LLCT statesmdashagain with some MLCT admixturemdashwhere theelectron is excited counterclockwise (in the used orientation and for the employed enantiomer of [Ir(ppy)3]) fromone ligand to another one Hence the six triplet states can be described as a set of three MLCTIL states and threehigher-energy LLCTMLCT states

On a side note T4 T5 and T6 do not reect the proper symmetry of the molecule because our calculation did notconsider explicit symmetry This symmetry breaking can be explained by the fact that the three states are nearlydegenerate and therefore can mix Now apparently the computation converged to three states where the excitationsare clearly localized Oppositely one can expect that the properly symmetrized states would be more delocalizedforming one A state which is a positive linear combination of the three states and a pair of E states Neverthelessthese symmetrized states would still retain their counterclockwise CT characters even though this might not beimmediately visible in the NTO representation of the symmetrized states This discussion shows that in this complexthe states have a tendency to easily break symmetry

Whereas the NTOs contain the full information of the initial TDA computation there are also ways to reducethis information and represent the excitation in an even more compact way A weighted sum of the electron and holeNTOs leads to the electron and hole densities [71]

ρIh(r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ h Ip (r)

)2(9)

ρIe (r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ e Ip (r)

)2(10)

also termed (unrelaxed) attachment and detachment densities [101] The dierence between these two leads to the

8

unrelaxed dierence densityρIdi (r) = ρIh(r) minus ρIe (r) (11)

while the sumρIspin(r) = ρIh(r) + ρIe (r) (12)

corresponds to the spin-density in a high-spin triplet computation

If one goes beyond the TDA eg with full TD-DFT wave function based methods or by including orbitalrelaxations as present in the theory of analytical energy gradients [102] these simple rules connecting the NTOswith the dierence and spin densities no longer apply and a wealth of new information can be extracted from thedeviations of these quantities provided suitable analysis methods are chosen [71] In particular a comparison of theNTOs with the eigenvectors of the relaxed dierence density matrixmdashtermed natural dierence orbitalsmdashproved to bevery useful for analyzing secondary orbital relaxation eects accompanying the main excitation process [103] It wasshown that these eects were particularly pronounced for the MLCT states of a small model iridium complex wherethe occupied d-orbitals contracted after one electron was removed [81]

3 Quantication of excited state localization and charge transfer

In the following section we show how it is possible to identify state characters based on the computation ofdescriptors while avoiding entirely the visual inspection of orbitals As alluded to in the introduction a numericalcharacterization of excited states promises several advantages it allows avoiding laborious manual work and can beautomatized for a large number of excited states it is objective reproducible and more precise it allows spottingsmall dierences trends or continuous changes and nally can reveal physics which cannot be represented throughorbital pictures

One such descriptor the PRNTO value of equation (8) was already introduced above In the following we willintroduce another kind of descriptor the charge transfer number [70 104] which will be our main tool for theremainder of the text The following subsections will rst generally outline the underlying theory and show examplesfor the most common case of non-relativistic (or scalar relativistic) wave functions Subsequently we will presentthe rst application of the same methodology to spin-orbit coupled relativistic states Finally motivated by the factthat in certain situations the dierent computed charge transfer numbers are strongly correlated we present a novelclustering ansatz which allows automatically dividing a molecule into chromophoric subunits

31 Charge transfer numbers

Excited states are usually discussed in terms of where the excitation originatesmdashie where the excitation hole islocalizedmdashand where it goes tomdashie where the excited electron is localized For example the excitation in an MLCTstate originates at a metal orbital and goes to one or more ligands an IL state originates at a ligand and goes to adierent orbital at the same ligand The purpose of the charge transfer numbers is to formalize this concept Againthe 1TDM TI is considered as the central object but instead of visualizing it we partition it among dierent fragmentsof the molecular system under study Mathematically speaking the fragments are mutually disjoint subsets of theatoms of the molecule Usually the fragments are dened by chemical intuition eg each ligand of a complex istreated as a separate fragment but later on we will also discuss strategies for automatic fragmentation

The rst step is a transformation of the 1TDM from the MO basis to the atomic orbital (AO) basis

TI = CTICT (13)

where C is the MO-coecient matrix The square of an element of this matrix (T Imicroν )2 measures the contribution

of an excitation originating on the atomic orbital (AO) χmicro and going to the AO χν The charge transfer numberΩIAB is now intended to measure the total contributions of excitations that originate at any AO centered on an atom

of fragment A and go to any AO on fragment B In a naive implementation one could simply sum over all (T Imicroν )2

9

elements where micro lies on A and ν lies on B However for a rigorous computation it is necessary to apply a populationanalysis scheme that takes into account the non-orthogonality of the AOs There is no unique way of dividing thedensity among atoms and a number of dierent population analysis schemes have been devised [105] Two suchanalysis schemes were adapted for analyzing the 1TDM [71 106] and implemented in TheoDORE First it is possible[71] to partition the 1TDM in the spirit of a Mulliken analysis

ΩIAB =

12

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

[(TI S)microν (STI )microν + T I

microν (STI S)microν] (14)

where S is the AO overlap matrix yielding an equation that is related to Mayerrsquos bond order [107] Alternatively aLoumlwdin orthogonalization can be applied to TI [106] leading to the orthogonal matrix

TI = S12TI S12 (15)

which can be directly used for summation

ΩIAB =

summicro isinA

sumν isinB(T Imicroν )2 (16)

In the implementation used here the Loumlwdin orthogonalization proceeds by using the following identity

TI = S12TI S12 = (PQT)TI (PQT)T (17)

where P and Q are the matrices containing the left and right singular vectors of the MO-coecient matrix C It isthus possible to evaluate Equation (16) without knowledge of the AO overlap matrix S and a similar consideration[70] also applies for Equation (14) Whereas Equation (14) was initially implemented in TheoDORE it is advisable torather apply the Loumlwdin style partitioning of Equation (16) since it is computationally more ecient and in mostcases numerically more stable (ie the ΩI

AB values are strictly positive which is not necessarily the case for theMulliken partitioning) It is in principle possible to extend this formalism to other more involved population analysisschemes but this has not been attempted yet

Finally the quantityΩI =

sumAB

ΩIAB =

sumr s

(T Ir s )2 =

sump

(λIp )2 (18)

which is equivalent to the Frobenius norm of T (or T) can be dened [71 108] In the case of a normalized CISor TDA wave function this value is always equal to 1 whereas it is generally less than 1 for correlated ab initiomethods [103 109] In the latter case the ΩI value can be applied as a method-independent measure for the single-excitation character where ΩI = 1 corresponds to a pure singly excited state and smaller values indicate contributionsfrom double or higher excitations The physical meaning of ΩI is that it allows making some statements abouttransition properties of one-electron operators [108] Specically from ΩI = 0 it follows that 〈Ψ0 |O (1) |ΨI 〉 = 0 forany possible one-electron operator O (1) for example the dipole moment operator or a spin-orbit operator in a meaneld approximation

For a system of nfrag fragments the charge transfer number analysis produces an nfrag times nfrag matrix with allthe possible contributions Here the diagonal elements ΩI

AA correspond to local excitations on fragment A whileΩIAB A B are charge transfer contributions The matrix elements ΩI

AB can be directly plotted in the form of atwo-dimensional matrix plot (sometimes called electron-hole pair correlation plot) as has been discussed for examplein Refs [79 110ndash112]

Such matrix plots are shown in Figure 3 for the T1 minusT6 states of [Ir(ppy)3] denoting the three ppy ligands asL1 L2 and L3 Starting with the T1 state (Figure 3a) it is observed that the three strongest contributions (16 each)are situated on the diagonal corresponding to local excitations on each of the three ligands In addition threecontributions (13 each) are seen corresponding to IrrarrL excitations The same types of transitions are also presentfor theT2 andT3 (Figure 3b-c) states with the exception that the symmetry is broken and the ligands do not contribute

10

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

1 13 13 13

0 16 2 2

0 2 16 2

0 2 2 16

(a) T1 (289 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 19 1 16

1 29 0 2

0 2 0 2

1 2 0 24

(b) T2 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 5 23 8

0 7 2 1

1 1 35 1

1 1 3 11

(c) T3 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3Ir

L1L2

L32 1 2 46

1 0 1 22

0 0 1 7

1 0 0 15

(d) T4 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 3 45 2

0 1 6 0

1 1 14 1

1 1 22 0

(e) T5 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 46 3 1

0 14 1 1

1 22 1 1

0 7 1 0

(f) T6 (317 eV)

Figure 3 Matrix plots of the charge transfer numbers for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] In the plots the magnitude of the elements of the4 times 4 matrices are given by the color the numbers give the numerical value (in ) The labels L1 L2 and L3 denote the three ppy ligands Theexcitation hole is plotted on the vertical axis the excited electron on the horizontal axis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

equally to these states The states T4 to T6 (Figures 3d-f) show distinctly dierent plots as opposed to the rst threestates In these cases only one column of the matrix shows signicant contributions meaning that the excited electronis localized on one of the ligands The excitation hole always has its strongest contribution on Ir (46) the secondcontribution (22) is of LLCT type (Li rarrLj i j) and only the third contribution (14ndash15) is of IL type (Li rarrLi )

While the plots shown in Figure 3 provide a compact and rigorous representation of the excitations it is oftenconvenient to further compress the information For this purpose for each state partial sums are computed over allthe contributions that correspond to one of the ve classes of TMC excited states MC MLCT LMCT IL and LLCTHere the IrrarrIr matrix element gives the MC contribution to the state the sum of the IrrarrLi elements gives theMLCT contribution and so on This generic partitioning of the charge transfer number matrix is shown in Figure 4It can be applied to homoleptic complexes or more generally to TMCs where all ligands are treated as equivalentInstead of plotting the whole matrix of ΩI

AB it is now possible to identify one or two dominant contributions andrepresent them in tabular form Naturally the downside of this compression is that some information is lostmdashin thiscase the information about excitation localization on the individual ligands Hence one should carefully decide onthe degree of data compression depending on the application

For the six triplets of [Ir(ppy)3] the results of this analysis are shown in Table 2 It can be readily seen that thesix states form two strongly related sets of states T1 T2 and T3 have almost identical state character contributionsand the three other states likewise Furthermore it can be argued that the obtained numeric values provide moreinsight than that gained above from the NTOs Accordingly it can be seen that the three lowest-lying triplet statesare predominantly ligand-centered with around 50 IL character and only around 35 MLCT In contrast the higherstates are of predominant MLCT (50) character and possess LLCT character as a secondary contribution (31)

The information contained in the table can also be depicted in compact form as shown in Figure 5 where theenergy is depicted with horizontal bars the main state character is indicated by the color of these horizontal barsand the contributions to the state character are shown in stacked bar plots The advantage of this gure is that it canbe easily scaled to a relatively large number of states by simply making the bars narrower For instance 30ndash50 statescan be depicted in a gure of similar size (as will be shown below) while a table conveying the same information for50 states would probably take more than half a page Moreover spotting trends or patterns within the table would bemuch more cumbersome than glancing at the colors of the gure

11

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

HolePo

sition

Electron Position

MC MLCT

LMCT(Ph)3

rarr(Ph)3

IL

IL

IL

LLCT

LLCT

Figure 4 Division of the charge transfer matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states

Table 2 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and most important state character contributions for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym State characterT1 289 A 49 IL 38 MLCTT2 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT3 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT4 317 A+E 49 MLCT 31 LLCTT5 317 A+E 50 MLCT 31 LLCTT6 317 A+E 50 MLCT 32 LLCT

In summary the presented protocol enables a completely automatized quantitative and reproducible assignmentof state characters in TMCs In Sections 41 to 45 we will show that the methodology can be applied benecially incases where a larger number of states are to be analyzed where detailed understanding of ligand eects is needed orto rationalize the eects of geometric modications

32 Charge transfer numbers for spin-mixed states

In TMCs SOC is very relevant due to the large nuclear charge of the metal atom SOC is often included in theelectronic Hamiltonian as a perturbation [41 113ndash116]

H el = HMCH + H SOC (19)

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6020406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

) LLCTILLMCTMLCTMC

29303132

E(e

V)

Figure 5 Decomposition of the charge transfer number matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

12

where HMCH is the molecular Coulomb Hamiltonian (MCH) [117] which contains the (scalar relativistic) kinetic energyand Coulomb potential energies of the electrons In practice one usually rst computes a number of eigenstatesof the MCH (ΨMCH also called spin-free states) eg singlets and triplets and subsequently evaluates the SOCmatrix elements within this set of states The spin-orbit-coupled states (or diagonal states) can then be obtained ina perturbative fashion by a diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix where the diagonal elements contain theenergies of the MCH states and the o-diagonal elements are the SOCs The approximation of this step is neglectingthe SOC matrix elements with all higher states not computed in the rst step The diagonalization of HMCHmdashwithelements HMCH

I J = 〈ΨMCHI |H el |ΨMCH

J 〉mdashcan be written as

Hdiag = UdaggerHMCHU (20)

where U is the eigenvector matrix of HMCH The matrix U allows reconstructing the wave function of the diagonalstate in terms of the MCH states

|Ψdiagα 〉 =

sumI

|ΨMCHI 〉UIα (21)

Assuming that the ground state Ψ0 is not aected by this transformation which is often a good approximation the1TDM between the ground state and an excited diagonal state is given by

T αr s =langΨ0

adaggerr as Ψdiagα

rang (22)

which after insertion of Equation (21) reads

T αr s =sumI

langΨ0

adaggerr as ΨMCHI

rangUIα =

sumI

T Ir sUIα (23)

Insertion into Equation (17) shows that the same relations also holds for the orthogonalized matrices ie

T αr s =sumI

T Ir sUIα (24)

and Equation (16) nally leads to

ΩαAB =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ α

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

T ImicroνT

Jmicroν =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ αΩIminusJAB (25)

Here the diagonal elements ΩIminusIAB are equivalent to the charge transfer numbers ΩI

AB of the MCH states as denedabove and the o-diagonal ΩIminusJ

AB terms are computed in an analogous fashion using the 1TDMs of two dierentstates Importantly the evaluation of Equation (25) does not require any signicant additional computational eortwhen compared to the MCH case since all required TI matrices are already available This transformation has beennewly implemented into TheoDORE in the course of this work and we will illustrate its potential below

In order to visualize the resulting data we rst consider a plot of the energies versus oscillator strengths Figure 6shows these two quantities for the lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] The spin-pure (singlet and triplet) states in theMCH representation are denoted by open rings and the spin-mixed states in the diagonal representation by lledcircles As the diagonal states do not have a well-dened total spin value we indicate the total spin expectation valueof these states by color Additionally we draw arrows between the MCH and diagonal states in such a way that it canbe discerned which MCH states contribute to which diagonal states In that way the plot can be used to analyze theelectronic structure of the diagonal states in a visual way At rst glance the complexity of the diagonal states can beappreciated ie in most cases the diagonal states are a linear combination of a large number of dierent MCH states

The reason to show energies versus oscillator strengths is that for [Ir(ppy)3] and related complexes the characterof the lowest diagonal triplet states (the sublevels of theT1) is decisive for its phosphorescence properties Ideally thelowest triplet sublevel should have signicant oscillator strength in order to facilitate fast and ecient phosphorescentdecay It has been shown by theoretical arguments [16 118] that for pseudo-octahedral complexes of trigonal

13

T1T23 T4minus6

S1

S23

X1

28 30 32 34 36

000

001

002

Energy (eV)

Osc

illat

orst

reng

th

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3

〈S2〉

Figure 6 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and oscillator strengths of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] in theMCH representation (open rings) and in the diagonal representation (lled circles) For each state the color indicates the spin multiplicitymdashredor blue for the spin-pure MCH states or any intermediate color for the spin-mixed diagonal states The arrows indicate which MCH statescontribute to which diagonal states with the arrow thickness indicating the weight of the contributions X1 denotes the lowest diagonal state(TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

T1

T23

T4minus6

S1 S2

X1

28 30 32 34 3610

20

30

40

50

60

Energy (eV)

MLC

Tch

arac

ter

()

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3〈S

2〉

Figure 7 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and MLCT character of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] Themeaning of the colors and arrows is the same as in Figure 6 (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

symmetry the lowest triplet sublevel is forbidden from decaying radiatively while the higher sublevels are allowedto phosphoresce This result is recovered in our calculations as can be seen in Figure 6 where the lowest diagonalstate (labeled ldquoX1rdquo) has an oscillator strength of zero The plot also shows that some of the other sublevels of T1T2 and T3 indeed acquire small oscillator strengths Figure 6 also reveals that the intensity of these states does notoriginate from the lowest singlet states S1 minus S3 as one might have assumed initially but it actually derives from therelatively bright S4 and S5 state pair (not shown due to scale) A possible explanation for this nding is given bythe general properties of the spin-orbit operator which govern the magnitude of the SOCs [114] Accordingly ina TMC one can expect very large SOCs between a singlet I and a triplet J if the transition I rarr J is a one-electron

14

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

074 012 012

T1 289 eV (173)

067 031

T2 293 eV (182)

070 020

T3 293 eV (181)

094

T4 317 eV (111)

091

T5 317 eV (117)

093

T6 317 eV (113)

Figure 2 Depiction of the leading NTO pairs for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] with the weights of the NTO pairs given above the arrowsThe labels under each set of NTOs indicates the shown state the excitation energy and the PRNTO in parenthesis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

The analysis of the NTOs in Figure 2 allows obtaining qualitative insight into the state characters beyond theinsight gained from Table 1 First PRNTO allows judging the multi-congurational character of the states showingthat the rst three triplets are indeed multi-congurationalmdashas could be anticipated above On the contrary T4T5 and T6 are identied as virtually single-congurational statesmdasha fact that could hardly be expected from thecanonical orbital representation Moreover in the NTO basis we can qualitatively distinguish between IL and LLCTtransitions T1T2 andT3 seem to mostly involve local IL excitations besides the MLCT character This is unexpectedsince in the canonical representation T2 and T3 were mixtures of excitations from the Ha orbital which is fullydelocalized The higher triplets constitute a set of LLCT statesmdashagain with some MLCT admixturemdashwhere theelectron is excited counterclockwise (in the used orientation and for the employed enantiomer of [Ir(ppy)3]) fromone ligand to another one Hence the six triplet states can be described as a set of three MLCTIL states and threehigher-energy LLCTMLCT states

On a side note T4 T5 and T6 do not reect the proper symmetry of the molecule because our calculation did notconsider explicit symmetry This symmetry breaking can be explained by the fact that the three states are nearlydegenerate and therefore can mix Now apparently the computation converged to three states where the excitationsare clearly localized Oppositely one can expect that the properly symmetrized states would be more delocalizedforming one A state which is a positive linear combination of the three states and a pair of E states Neverthelessthese symmetrized states would still retain their counterclockwise CT characters even though this might not beimmediately visible in the NTO representation of the symmetrized states This discussion shows that in this complexthe states have a tendency to easily break symmetry

Whereas the NTOs contain the full information of the initial TDA computation there are also ways to reducethis information and represent the excitation in an even more compact way A weighted sum of the electron and holeNTOs leads to the electron and hole densities [71]

ρIh(r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ h Ip (r)

)2(9)

ρIe (r) =sump

(λIp )2(ψ e Ip (r)

)2(10)

also termed (unrelaxed) attachment and detachment densities [101] The dierence between these two leads to the

8

unrelaxed dierence densityρIdi (r) = ρIh(r) minus ρIe (r) (11)

while the sumρIspin(r) = ρIh(r) + ρIe (r) (12)

corresponds to the spin-density in a high-spin triplet computation

If one goes beyond the TDA eg with full TD-DFT wave function based methods or by including orbitalrelaxations as present in the theory of analytical energy gradients [102] these simple rules connecting the NTOswith the dierence and spin densities no longer apply and a wealth of new information can be extracted from thedeviations of these quantities provided suitable analysis methods are chosen [71] In particular a comparison of theNTOs with the eigenvectors of the relaxed dierence density matrixmdashtermed natural dierence orbitalsmdashproved to bevery useful for analyzing secondary orbital relaxation eects accompanying the main excitation process [103] It wasshown that these eects were particularly pronounced for the MLCT states of a small model iridium complex wherethe occupied d-orbitals contracted after one electron was removed [81]

3 Quantication of excited state localization and charge transfer

In the following section we show how it is possible to identify state characters based on the computation ofdescriptors while avoiding entirely the visual inspection of orbitals As alluded to in the introduction a numericalcharacterization of excited states promises several advantages it allows avoiding laborious manual work and can beautomatized for a large number of excited states it is objective reproducible and more precise it allows spottingsmall dierences trends or continuous changes and nally can reveal physics which cannot be represented throughorbital pictures

One such descriptor the PRNTO value of equation (8) was already introduced above In the following we willintroduce another kind of descriptor the charge transfer number [70 104] which will be our main tool for theremainder of the text The following subsections will rst generally outline the underlying theory and show examplesfor the most common case of non-relativistic (or scalar relativistic) wave functions Subsequently we will presentthe rst application of the same methodology to spin-orbit coupled relativistic states Finally motivated by the factthat in certain situations the dierent computed charge transfer numbers are strongly correlated we present a novelclustering ansatz which allows automatically dividing a molecule into chromophoric subunits

31 Charge transfer numbers

Excited states are usually discussed in terms of where the excitation originatesmdashie where the excitation hole islocalizedmdashand where it goes tomdashie where the excited electron is localized For example the excitation in an MLCTstate originates at a metal orbital and goes to one or more ligands an IL state originates at a ligand and goes to adierent orbital at the same ligand The purpose of the charge transfer numbers is to formalize this concept Againthe 1TDM TI is considered as the central object but instead of visualizing it we partition it among dierent fragmentsof the molecular system under study Mathematically speaking the fragments are mutually disjoint subsets of theatoms of the molecule Usually the fragments are dened by chemical intuition eg each ligand of a complex istreated as a separate fragment but later on we will also discuss strategies for automatic fragmentation

The rst step is a transformation of the 1TDM from the MO basis to the atomic orbital (AO) basis

TI = CTICT (13)

where C is the MO-coecient matrix The square of an element of this matrix (T Imicroν )2 measures the contribution

of an excitation originating on the atomic orbital (AO) χmicro and going to the AO χν The charge transfer numberΩIAB is now intended to measure the total contributions of excitations that originate at any AO centered on an atom

of fragment A and go to any AO on fragment B In a naive implementation one could simply sum over all (T Imicroν )2

9

elements where micro lies on A and ν lies on B However for a rigorous computation it is necessary to apply a populationanalysis scheme that takes into account the non-orthogonality of the AOs There is no unique way of dividing thedensity among atoms and a number of dierent population analysis schemes have been devised [105] Two suchanalysis schemes were adapted for analyzing the 1TDM [71 106] and implemented in TheoDORE First it is possible[71] to partition the 1TDM in the spirit of a Mulliken analysis

ΩIAB =

12

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

[(TI S)microν (STI )microν + T I

microν (STI S)microν] (14)

where S is the AO overlap matrix yielding an equation that is related to Mayerrsquos bond order [107] Alternatively aLoumlwdin orthogonalization can be applied to TI [106] leading to the orthogonal matrix

TI = S12TI S12 (15)

which can be directly used for summation

ΩIAB =

summicro isinA

sumν isinB(T Imicroν )2 (16)

In the implementation used here the Loumlwdin orthogonalization proceeds by using the following identity

TI = S12TI S12 = (PQT)TI (PQT)T (17)

where P and Q are the matrices containing the left and right singular vectors of the MO-coecient matrix C It isthus possible to evaluate Equation (16) without knowledge of the AO overlap matrix S and a similar consideration[70] also applies for Equation (14) Whereas Equation (14) was initially implemented in TheoDORE it is advisable torather apply the Loumlwdin style partitioning of Equation (16) since it is computationally more ecient and in mostcases numerically more stable (ie the ΩI

AB values are strictly positive which is not necessarily the case for theMulliken partitioning) It is in principle possible to extend this formalism to other more involved population analysisschemes but this has not been attempted yet

Finally the quantityΩI =

sumAB

ΩIAB =

sumr s

(T Ir s )2 =

sump

(λIp )2 (18)

which is equivalent to the Frobenius norm of T (or T) can be dened [71 108] In the case of a normalized CISor TDA wave function this value is always equal to 1 whereas it is generally less than 1 for correlated ab initiomethods [103 109] In the latter case the ΩI value can be applied as a method-independent measure for the single-excitation character where ΩI = 1 corresponds to a pure singly excited state and smaller values indicate contributionsfrom double or higher excitations The physical meaning of ΩI is that it allows making some statements abouttransition properties of one-electron operators [108] Specically from ΩI = 0 it follows that 〈Ψ0 |O (1) |ΨI 〉 = 0 forany possible one-electron operator O (1) for example the dipole moment operator or a spin-orbit operator in a meaneld approximation

For a system of nfrag fragments the charge transfer number analysis produces an nfrag times nfrag matrix with allthe possible contributions Here the diagonal elements ΩI

AA correspond to local excitations on fragment A whileΩIAB A B are charge transfer contributions The matrix elements ΩI

AB can be directly plotted in the form of atwo-dimensional matrix plot (sometimes called electron-hole pair correlation plot) as has been discussed for examplein Refs [79 110ndash112]

Such matrix plots are shown in Figure 3 for the T1 minusT6 states of [Ir(ppy)3] denoting the three ppy ligands asL1 L2 and L3 Starting with the T1 state (Figure 3a) it is observed that the three strongest contributions (16 each)are situated on the diagonal corresponding to local excitations on each of the three ligands In addition threecontributions (13 each) are seen corresponding to IrrarrL excitations The same types of transitions are also presentfor theT2 andT3 (Figure 3b-c) states with the exception that the symmetry is broken and the ligands do not contribute

10

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

1 13 13 13

0 16 2 2

0 2 16 2

0 2 2 16

(a) T1 (289 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 19 1 16

1 29 0 2

0 2 0 2

1 2 0 24

(b) T2 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 5 23 8

0 7 2 1

1 1 35 1

1 1 3 11

(c) T3 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3Ir

L1L2

L32 1 2 46

1 0 1 22

0 0 1 7

1 0 0 15

(d) T4 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 3 45 2

0 1 6 0

1 1 14 1

1 1 22 0

(e) T5 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 46 3 1

0 14 1 1

1 22 1 1

0 7 1 0

(f) T6 (317 eV)

Figure 3 Matrix plots of the charge transfer numbers for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] In the plots the magnitude of the elements of the4 times 4 matrices are given by the color the numbers give the numerical value (in ) The labels L1 L2 and L3 denote the three ppy ligands Theexcitation hole is plotted on the vertical axis the excited electron on the horizontal axis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

equally to these states The states T4 to T6 (Figures 3d-f) show distinctly dierent plots as opposed to the rst threestates In these cases only one column of the matrix shows signicant contributions meaning that the excited electronis localized on one of the ligands The excitation hole always has its strongest contribution on Ir (46) the secondcontribution (22) is of LLCT type (Li rarrLj i j) and only the third contribution (14ndash15) is of IL type (Li rarrLi )

While the plots shown in Figure 3 provide a compact and rigorous representation of the excitations it is oftenconvenient to further compress the information For this purpose for each state partial sums are computed over allthe contributions that correspond to one of the ve classes of TMC excited states MC MLCT LMCT IL and LLCTHere the IrrarrIr matrix element gives the MC contribution to the state the sum of the IrrarrLi elements gives theMLCT contribution and so on This generic partitioning of the charge transfer number matrix is shown in Figure 4It can be applied to homoleptic complexes or more generally to TMCs where all ligands are treated as equivalentInstead of plotting the whole matrix of ΩI

AB it is now possible to identify one or two dominant contributions andrepresent them in tabular form Naturally the downside of this compression is that some information is lostmdashin thiscase the information about excitation localization on the individual ligands Hence one should carefully decide onthe degree of data compression depending on the application

For the six triplets of [Ir(ppy)3] the results of this analysis are shown in Table 2 It can be readily seen that thesix states form two strongly related sets of states T1 T2 and T3 have almost identical state character contributionsand the three other states likewise Furthermore it can be argued that the obtained numeric values provide moreinsight than that gained above from the NTOs Accordingly it can be seen that the three lowest-lying triplet statesare predominantly ligand-centered with around 50 IL character and only around 35 MLCT In contrast the higherstates are of predominant MLCT (50) character and possess LLCT character as a secondary contribution (31)

The information contained in the table can also be depicted in compact form as shown in Figure 5 where theenergy is depicted with horizontal bars the main state character is indicated by the color of these horizontal barsand the contributions to the state character are shown in stacked bar plots The advantage of this gure is that it canbe easily scaled to a relatively large number of states by simply making the bars narrower For instance 30ndash50 statescan be depicted in a gure of similar size (as will be shown below) while a table conveying the same information for50 states would probably take more than half a page Moreover spotting trends or patterns within the table would bemuch more cumbersome than glancing at the colors of the gure

11

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

HolePo

sition

Electron Position

MC MLCT

LMCT(Ph)3

rarr(Ph)3

IL

IL

IL

LLCT

LLCT

Figure 4 Division of the charge transfer matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states

Table 2 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and most important state character contributions for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym State characterT1 289 A 49 IL 38 MLCTT2 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT3 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT4 317 A+E 49 MLCT 31 LLCTT5 317 A+E 50 MLCT 31 LLCTT6 317 A+E 50 MLCT 32 LLCT

In summary the presented protocol enables a completely automatized quantitative and reproducible assignmentof state characters in TMCs In Sections 41 to 45 we will show that the methodology can be applied benecially incases where a larger number of states are to be analyzed where detailed understanding of ligand eects is needed orto rationalize the eects of geometric modications

32 Charge transfer numbers for spin-mixed states

In TMCs SOC is very relevant due to the large nuclear charge of the metal atom SOC is often included in theelectronic Hamiltonian as a perturbation [41 113ndash116]

H el = HMCH + H SOC (19)

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6020406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

) LLCTILLMCTMLCTMC

29303132

E(e

V)

Figure 5 Decomposition of the charge transfer number matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

12

where HMCH is the molecular Coulomb Hamiltonian (MCH) [117] which contains the (scalar relativistic) kinetic energyand Coulomb potential energies of the electrons In practice one usually rst computes a number of eigenstatesof the MCH (ΨMCH also called spin-free states) eg singlets and triplets and subsequently evaluates the SOCmatrix elements within this set of states The spin-orbit-coupled states (or diagonal states) can then be obtained ina perturbative fashion by a diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix where the diagonal elements contain theenergies of the MCH states and the o-diagonal elements are the SOCs The approximation of this step is neglectingthe SOC matrix elements with all higher states not computed in the rst step The diagonalization of HMCHmdashwithelements HMCH

I J = 〈ΨMCHI |H el |ΨMCH

J 〉mdashcan be written as

Hdiag = UdaggerHMCHU (20)

where U is the eigenvector matrix of HMCH The matrix U allows reconstructing the wave function of the diagonalstate in terms of the MCH states

|Ψdiagα 〉 =

sumI

|ΨMCHI 〉UIα (21)

Assuming that the ground state Ψ0 is not aected by this transformation which is often a good approximation the1TDM between the ground state and an excited diagonal state is given by

T αr s =langΨ0

adaggerr as Ψdiagα

rang (22)

which after insertion of Equation (21) reads

T αr s =sumI

langΨ0

adaggerr as ΨMCHI

rangUIα =

sumI

T Ir sUIα (23)

Insertion into Equation (17) shows that the same relations also holds for the orthogonalized matrices ie

T αr s =sumI

T Ir sUIα (24)

and Equation (16) nally leads to

ΩαAB =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ α

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

T ImicroνT

Jmicroν =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ αΩIminusJAB (25)

Here the diagonal elements ΩIminusIAB are equivalent to the charge transfer numbers ΩI

AB of the MCH states as denedabove and the o-diagonal ΩIminusJ

AB terms are computed in an analogous fashion using the 1TDMs of two dierentstates Importantly the evaluation of Equation (25) does not require any signicant additional computational eortwhen compared to the MCH case since all required TI matrices are already available This transformation has beennewly implemented into TheoDORE in the course of this work and we will illustrate its potential below

In order to visualize the resulting data we rst consider a plot of the energies versus oscillator strengths Figure 6shows these two quantities for the lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] The spin-pure (singlet and triplet) states in theMCH representation are denoted by open rings and the spin-mixed states in the diagonal representation by lledcircles As the diagonal states do not have a well-dened total spin value we indicate the total spin expectation valueof these states by color Additionally we draw arrows between the MCH and diagonal states in such a way that it canbe discerned which MCH states contribute to which diagonal states In that way the plot can be used to analyze theelectronic structure of the diagonal states in a visual way At rst glance the complexity of the diagonal states can beappreciated ie in most cases the diagonal states are a linear combination of a large number of dierent MCH states

The reason to show energies versus oscillator strengths is that for [Ir(ppy)3] and related complexes the characterof the lowest diagonal triplet states (the sublevels of theT1) is decisive for its phosphorescence properties Ideally thelowest triplet sublevel should have signicant oscillator strength in order to facilitate fast and ecient phosphorescentdecay It has been shown by theoretical arguments [16 118] that for pseudo-octahedral complexes of trigonal

13

T1T23 T4minus6

S1

S23

X1

28 30 32 34 36

000

001

002

Energy (eV)

Osc

illat

orst

reng

th

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3

〈S2〉

Figure 6 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and oscillator strengths of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] in theMCH representation (open rings) and in the diagonal representation (lled circles) For each state the color indicates the spin multiplicitymdashredor blue for the spin-pure MCH states or any intermediate color for the spin-mixed diagonal states The arrows indicate which MCH statescontribute to which diagonal states with the arrow thickness indicating the weight of the contributions X1 denotes the lowest diagonal state(TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

T1

T23

T4minus6

S1 S2

X1

28 30 32 34 3610

20

30

40

50

60

Energy (eV)

MLC

Tch

arac

ter

()

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3〈S

2〉

Figure 7 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and MLCT character of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] Themeaning of the colors and arrows is the same as in Figure 6 (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

symmetry the lowest triplet sublevel is forbidden from decaying radiatively while the higher sublevels are allowedto phosphoresce This result is recovered in our calculations as can be seen in Figure 6 where the lowest diagonalstate (labeled ldquoX1rdquo) has an oscillator strength of zero The plot also shows that some of the other sublevels of T1T2 and T3 indeed acquire small oscillator strengths Figure 6 also reveals that the intensity of these states does notoriginate from the lowest singlet states S1 minus S3 as one might have assumed initially but it actually derives from therelatively bright S4 and S5 state pair (not shown due to scale) A possible explanation for this nding is given bythe general properties of the spin-orbit operator which govern the magnitude of the SOCs [114] Accordingly ina TMC one can expect very large SOCs between a singlet I and a triplet J if the transition I rarr J is a one-electron

14

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

unrelaxed dierence densityρIdi (r) = ρIh(r) minus ρIe (r) (11)

while the sumρIspin(r) = ρIh(r) + ρIe (r) (12)

corresponds to the spin-density in a high-spin triplet computation

If one goes beyond the TDA eg with full TD-DFT wave function based methods or by including orbitalrelaxations as present in the theory of analytical energy gradients [102] these simple rules connecting the NTOswith the dierence and spin densities no longer apply and a wealth of new information can be extracted from thedeviations of these quantities provided suitable analysis methods are chosen [71] In particular a comparison of theNTOs with the eigenvectors of the relaxed dierence density matrixmdashtermed natural dierence orbitalsmdashproved to bevery useful for analyzing secondary orbital relaxation eects accompanying the main excitation process [103] It wasshown that these eects were particularly pronounced for the MLCT states of a small model iridium complex wherethe occupied d-orbitals contracted after one electron was removed [81]

3 Quantication of excited state localization and charge transfer

In the following section we show how it is possible to identify state characters based on the computation ofdescriptors while avoiding entirely the visual inspection of orbitals As alluded to in the introduction a numericalcharacterization of excited states promises several advantages it allows avoiding laborious manual work and can beautomatized for a large number of excited states it is objective reproducible and more precise it allows spottingsmall dierences trends or continuous changes and nally can reveal physics which cannot be represented throughorbital pictures

One such descriptor the PRNTO value of equation (8) was already introduced above In the following we willintroduce another kind of descriptor the charge transfer number [70 104] which will be our main tool for theremainder of the text The following subsections will rst generally outline the underlying theory and show examplesfor the most common case of non-relativistic (or scalar relativistic) wave functions Subsequently we will presentthe rst application of the same methodology to spin-orbit coupled relativistic states Finally motivated by the factthat in certain situations the dierent computed charge transfer numbers are strongly correlated we present a novelclustering ansatz which allows automatically dividing a molecule into chromophoric subunits

31 Charge transfer numbers

Excited states are usually discussed in terms of where the excitation originatesmdashie where the excitation hole islocalizedmdashand where it goes tomdashie where the excited electron is localized For example the excitation in an MLCTstate originates at a metal orbital and goes to one or more ligands an IL state originates at a ligand and goes to adierent orbital at the same ligand The purpose of the charge transfer numbers is to formalize this concept Againthe 1TDM TI is considered as the central object but instead of visualizing it we partition it among dierent fragmentsof the molecular system under study Mathematically speaking the fragments are mutually disjoint subsets of theatoms of the molecule Usually the fragments are dened by chemical intuition eg each ligand of a complex istreated as a separate fragment but later on we will also discuss strategies for automatic fragmentation

The rst step is a transformation of the 1TDM from the MO basis to the atomic orbital (AO) basis

TI = CTICT (13)

where C is the MO-coecient matrix The square of an element of this matrix (T Imicroν )2 measures the contribution

of an excitation originating on the atomic orbital (AO) χmicro and going to the AO χν The charge transfer numberΩIAB is now intended to measure the total contributions of excitations that originate at any AO centered on an atom

of fragment A and go to any AO on fragment B In a naive implementation one could simply sum over all (T Imicroν )2

9

elements where micro lies on A and ν lies on B However for a rigorous computation it is necessary to apply a populationanalysis scheme that takes into account the non-orthogonality of the AOs There is no unique way of dividing thedensity among atoms and a number of dierent population analysis schemes have been devised [105] Two suchanalysis schemes were adapted for analyzing the 1TDM [71 106] and implemented in TheoDORE First it is possible[71] to partition the 1TDM in the spirit of a Mulliken analysis

ΩIAB =

12

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

[(TI S)microν (STI )microν + T I

microν (STI S)microν] (14)

where S is the AO overlap matrix yielding an equation that is related to Mayerrsquos bond order [107] Alternatively aLoumlwdin orthogonalization can be applied to TI [106] leading to the orthogonal matrix

TI = S12TI S12 (15)

which can be directly used for summation

ΩIAB =

summicro isinA

sumν isinB(T Imicroν )2 (16)

In the implementation used here the Loumlwdin orthogonalization proceeds by using the following identity

TI = S12TI S12 = (PQT)TI (PQT)T (17)

where P and Q are the matrices containing the left and right singular vectors of the MO-coecient matrix C It isthus possible to evaluate Equation (16) without knowledge of the AO overlap matrix S and a similar consideration[70] also applies for Equation (14) Whereas Equation (14) was initially implemented in TheoDORE it is advisable torather apply the Loumlwdin style partitioning of Equation (16) since it is computationally more ecient and in mostcases numerically more stable (ie the ΩI

AB values are strictly positive which is not necessarily the case for theMulliken partitioning) It is in principle possible to extend this formalism to other more involved population analysisschemes but this has not been attempted yet

Finally the quantityΩI =

sumAB

ΩIAB =

sumr s

(T Ir s )2 =

sump

(λIp )2 (18)

which is equivalent to the Frobenius norm of T (or T) can be dened [71 108] In the case of a normalized CISor TDA wave function this value is always equal to 1 whereas it is generally less than 1 for correlated ab initiomethods [103 109] In the latter case the ΩI value can be applied as a method-independent measure for the single-excitation character where ΩI = 1 corresponds to a pure singly excited state and smaller values indicate contributionsfrom double or higher excitations The physical meaning of ΩI is that it allows making some statements abouttransition properties of one-electron operators [108] Specically from ΩI = 0 it follows that 〈Ψ0 |O (1) |ΨI 〉 = 0 forany possible one-electron operator O (1) for example the dipole moment operator or a spin-orbit operator in a meaneld approximation

For a system of nfrag fragments the charge transfer number analysis produces an nfrag times nfrag matrix with allthe possible contributions Here the diagonal elements ΩI

AA correspond to local excitations on fragment A whileΩIAB A B are charge transfer contributions The matrix elements ΩI

AB can be directly plotted in the form of atwo-dimensional matrix plot (sometimes called electron-hole pair correlation plot) as has been discussed for examplein Refs [79 110ndash112]

Such matrix plots are shown in Figure 3 for the T1 minusT6 states of [Ir(ppy)3] denoting the three ppy ligands asL1 L2 and L3 Starting with the T1 state (Figure 3a) it is observed that the three strongest contributions (16 each)are situated on the diagonal corresponding to local excitations on each of the three ligands In addition threecontributions (13 each) are seen corresponding to IrrarrL excitations The same types of transitions are also presentfor theT2 andT3 (Figure 3b-c) states with the exception that the symmetry is broken and the ligands do not contribute

10

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

1 13 13 13

0 16 2 2

0 2 16 2

0 2 2 16

(a) T1 (289 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 19 1 16

1 29 0 2

0 2 0 2

1 2 0 24

(b) T2 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 5 23 8

0 7 2 1

1 1 35 1

1 1 3 11

(c) T3 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3Ir

L1L2

L32 1 2 46

1 0 1 22

0 0 1 7

1 0 0 15

(d) T4 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 3 45 2

0 1 6 0

1 1 14 1

1 1 22 0

(e) T5 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 46 3 1

0 14 1 1

1 22 1 1

0 7 1 0

(f) T6 (317 eV)

Figure 3 Matrix plots of the charge transfer numbers for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] In the plots the magnitude of the elements of the4 times 4 matrices are given by the color the numbers give the numerical value (in ) The labels L1 L2 and L3 denote the three ppy ligands Theexcitation hole is plotted on the vertical axis the excited electron on the horizontal axis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

equally to these states The states T4 to T6 (Figures 3d-f) show distinctly dierent plots as opposed to the rst threestates In these cases only one column of the matrix shows signicant contributions meaning that the excited electronis localized on one of the ligands The excitation hole always has its strongest contribution on Ir (46) the secondcontribution (22) is of LLCT type (Li rarrLj i j) and only the third contribution (14ndash15) is of IL type (Li rarrLi )

While the plots shown in Figure 3 provide a compact and rigorous representation of the excitations it is oftenconvenient to further compress the information For this purpose for each state partial sums are computed over allthe contributions that correspond to one of the ve classes of TMC excited states MC MLCT LMCT IL and LLCTHere the IrrarrIr matrix element gives the MC contribution to the state the sum of the IrrarrLi elements gives theMLCT contribution and so on This generic partitioning of the charge transfer number matrix is shown in Figure 4It can be applied to homoleptic complexes or more generally to TMCs where all ligands are treated as equivalentInstead of plotting the whole matrix of ΩI

AB it is now possible to identify one or two dominant contributions andrepresent them in tabular form Naturally the downside of this compression is that some information is lostmdashin thiscase the information about excitation localization on the individual ligands Hence one should carefully decide onthe degree of data compression depending on the application

For the six triplets of [Ir(ppy)3] the results of this analysis are shown in Table 2 It can be readily seen that thesix states form two strongly related sets of states T1 T2 and T3 have almost identical state character contributionsand the three other states likewise Furthermore it can be argued that the obtained numeric values provide moreinsight than that gained above from the NTOs Accordingly it can be seen that the three lowest-lying triplet statesare predominantly ligand-centered with around 50 IL character and only around 35 MLCT In contrast the higherstates are of predominant MLCT (50) character and possess LLCT character as a secondary contribution (31)

The information contained in the table can also be depicted in compact form as shown in Figure 5 where theenergy is depicted with horizontal bars the main state character is indicated by the color of these horizontal barsand the contributions to the state character are shown in stacked bar plots The advantage of this gure is that it canbe easily scaled to a relatively large number of states by simply making the bars narrower For instance 30ndash50 statescan be depicted in a gure of similar size (as will be shown below) while a table conveying the same information for50 states would probably take more than half a page Moreover spotting trends or patterns within the table would bemuch more cumbersome than glancing at the colors of the gure

11

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

HolePo

sition

Electron Position

MC MLCT

LMCT(Ph)3

rarr(Ph)3

IL

IL

IL

LLCT

LLCT

Figure 4 Division of the charge transfer matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states

Table 2 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and most important state character contributions for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym State characterT1 289 A 49 IL 38 MLCTT2 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT3 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT4 317 A+E 49 MLCT 31 LLCTT5 317 A+E 50 MLCT 31 LLCTT6 317 A+E 50 MLCT 32 LLCT

In summary the presented protocol enables a completely automatized quantitative and reproducible assignmentof state characters in TMCs In Sections 41 to 45 we will show that the methodology can be applied benecially incases where a larger number of states are to be analyzed where detailed understanding of ligand eects is needed orto rationalize the eects of geometric modications

32 Charge transfer numbers for spin-mixed states

In TMCs SOC is very relevant due to the large nuclear charge of the metal atom SOC is often included in theelectronic Hamiltonian as a perturbation [41 113ndash116]

H el = HMCH + H SOC (19)

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6020406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

) LLCTILLMCTMLCTMC

29303132

E(e

V)

Figure 5 Decomposition of the charge transfer number matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

12

where HMCH is the molecular Coulomb Hamiltonian (MCH) [117] which contains the (scalar relativistic) kinetic energyand Coulomb potential energies of the electrons In practice one usually rst computes a number of eigenstatesof the MCH (ΨMCH also called spin-free states) eg singlets and triplets and subsequently evaluates the SOCmatrix elements within this set of states The spin-orbit-coupled states (or diagonal states) can then be obtained ina perturbative fashion by a diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix where the diagonal elements contain theenergies of the MCH states and the o-diagonal elements are the SOCs The approximation of this step is neglectingthe SOC matrix elements with all higher states not computed in the rst step The diagonalization of HMCHmdashwithelements HMCH

I J = 〈ΨMCHI |H el |ΨMCH

J 〉mdashcan be written as

Hdiag = UdaggerHMCHU (20)

where U is the eigenvector matrix of HMCH The matrix U allows reconstructing the wave function of the diagonalstate in terms of the MCH states

|Ψdiagα 〉 =

sumI

|ΨMCHI 〉UIα (21)

Assuming that the ground state Ψ0 is not aected by this transformation which is often a good approximation the1TDM between the ground state and an excited diagonal state is given by

T αr s =langΨ0

adaggerr as Ψdiagα

rang (22)

which after insertion of Equation (21) reads

T αr s =sumI

langΨ0

adaggerr as ΨMCHI

rangUIα =

sumI

T Ir sUIα (23)

Insertion into Equation (17) shows that the same relations also holds for the orthogonalized matrices ie

T αr s =sumI

T Ir sUIα (24)

and Equation (16) nally leads to

ΩαAB =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ α

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

T ImicroνT

Jmicroν =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ αΩIminusJAB (25)

Here the diagonal elements ΩIminusIAB are equivalent to the charge transfer numbers ΩI

AB of the MCH states as denedabove and the o-diagonal ΩIminusJ

AB terms are computed in an analogous fashion using the 1TDMs of two dierentstates Importantly the evaluation of Equation (25) does not require any signicant additional computational eortwhen compared to the MCH case since all required TI matrices are already available This transformation has beennewly implemented into TheoDORE in the course of this work and we will illustrate its potential below

In order to visualize the resulting data we rst consider a plot of the energies versus oscillator strengths Figure 6shows these two quantities for the lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] The spin-pure (singlet and triplet) states in theMCH representation are denoted by open rings and the spin-mixed states in the diagonal representation by lledcircles As the diagonal states do not have a well-dened total spin value we indicate the total spin expectation valueof these states by color Additionally we draw arrows between the MCH and diagonal states in such a way that it canbe discerned which MCH states contribute to which diagonal states In that way the plot can be used to analyze theelectronic structure of the diagonal states in a visual way At rst glance the complexity of the diagonal states can beappreciated ie in most cases the diagonal states are a linear combination of a large number of dierent MCH states

The reason to show energies versus oscillator strengths is that for [Ir(ppy)3] and related complexes the characterof the lowest diagonal triplet states (the sublevels of theT1) is decisive for its phosphorescence properties Ideally thelowest triplet sublevel should have signicant oscillator strength in order to facilitate fast and ecient phosphorescentdecay It has been shown by theoretical arguments [16 118] that for pseudo-octahedral complexes of trigonal

13

T1T23 T4minus6

S1

S23

X1

28 30 32 34 36

000

001

002

Energy (eV)

Osc

illat

orst

reng

th

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3

〈S2〉

Figure 6 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and oscillator strengths of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] in theMCH representation (open rings) and in the diagonal representation (lled circles) For each state the color indicates the spin multiplicitymdashredor blue for the spin-pure MCH states or any intermediate color for the spin-mixed diagonal states The arrows indicate which MCH statescontribute to which diagonal states with the arrow thickness indicating the weight of the contributions X1 denotes the lowest diagonal state(TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

T1

T23

T4minus6

S1 S2

X1

28 30 32 34 3610

20

30

40

50

60

Energy (eV)

MLC

Tch

arac

ter

()

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3〈S

2〉

Figure 7 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and MLCT character of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] Themeaning of the colors and arrows is the same as in Figure 6 (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

symmetry the lowest triplet sublevel is forbidden from decaying radiatively while the higher sublevels are allowedto phosphoresce This result is recovered in our calculations as can be seen in Figure 6 where the lowest diagonalstate (labeled ldquoX1rdquo) has an oscillator strength of zero The plot also shows that some of the other sublevels of T1T2 and T3 indeed acquire small oscillator strengths Figure 6 also reveals that the intensity of these states does notoriginate from the lowest singlet states S1 minus S3 as one might have assumed initially but it actually derives from therelatively bright S4 and S5 state pair (not shown due to scale) A possible explanation for this nding is given bythe general properties of the spin-orbit operator which govern the magnitude of the SOCs [114] Accordingly ina TMC one can expect very large SOCs between a singlet I and a triplet J if the transition I rarr J is a one-electron

14

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

elements where micro lies on A and ν lies on B However for a rigorous computation it is necessary to apply a populationanalysis scheme that takes into account the non-orthogonality of the AOs There is no unique way of dividing thedensity among atoms and a number of dierent population analysis schemes have been devised [105] Two suchanalysis schemes were adapted for analyzing the 1TDM [71 106] and implemented in TheoDORE First it is possible[71] to partition the 1TDM in the spirit of a Mulliken analysis

ΩIAB =

12

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

[(TI S)microν (STI )microν + T I

microν (STI S)microν] (14)

where S is the AO overlap matrix yielding an equation that is related to Mayerrsquos bond order [107] Alternatively aLoumlwdin orthogonalization can be applied to TI [106] leading to the orthogonal matrix

TI = S12TI S12 (15)

which can be directly used for summation

ΩIAB =

summicro isinA

sumν isinB(T Imicroν )2 (16)

In the implementation used here the Loumlwdin orthogonalization proceeds by using the following identity

TI = S12TI S12 = (PQT)TI (PQT)T (17)

where P and Q are the matrices containing the left and right singular vectors of the MO-coecient matrix C It isthus possible to evaluate Equation (16) without knowledge of the AO overlap matrix S and a similar consideration[70] also applies for Equation (14) Whereas Equation (14) was initially implemented in TheoDORE it is advisable torather apply the Loumlwdin style partitioning of Equation (16) since it is computationally more ecient and in mostcases numerically more stable (ie the ΩI

AB values are strictly positive which is not necessarily the case for theMulliken partitioning) It is in principle possible to extend this formalism to other more involved population analysisschemes but this has not been attempted yet

Finally the quantityΩI =

sumAB

ΩIAB =

sumr s

(T Ir s )2 =

sump

(λIp )2 (18)

which is equivalent to the Frobenius norm of T (or T) can be dened [71 108] In the case of a normalized CISor TDA wave function this value is always equal to 1 whereas it is generally less than 1 for correlated ab initiomethods [103 109] In the latter case the ΩI value can be applied as a method-independent measure for the single-excitation character where ΩI = 1 corresponds to a pure singly excited state and smaller values indicate contributionsfrom double or higher excitations The physical meaning of ΩI is that it allows making some statements abouttransition properties of one-electron operators [108] Specically from ΩI = 0 it follows that 〈Ψ0 |O (1) |ΨI 〉 = 0 forany possible one-electron operator O (1) for example the dipole moment operator or a spin-orbit operator in a meaneld approximation

For a system of nfrag fragments the charge transfer number analysis produces an nfrag times nfrag matrix with allthe possible contributions Here the diagonal elements ΩI

AA correspond to local excitations on fragment A whileΩIAB A B are charge transfer contributions The matrix elements ΩI

AB can be directly plotted in the form of atwo-dimensional matrix plot (sometimes called electron-hole pair correlation plot) as has been discussed for examplein Refs [79 110ndash112]

Such matrix plots are shown in Figure 3 for the T1 minusT6 states of [Ir(ppy)3] denoting the three ppy ligands asL1 L2 and L3 Starting with the T1 state (Figure 3a) it is observed that the three strongest contributions (16 each)are situated on the diagonal corresponding to local excitations on each of the three ligands In addition threecontributions (13 each) are seen corresponding to IrrarrL excitations The same types of transitions are also presentfor theT2 andT3 (Figure 3b-c) states with the exception that the symmetry is broken and the ligands do not contribute

10

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

1 13 13 13

0 16 2 2

0 2 16 2

0 2 2 16

(a) T1 (289 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 19 1 16

1 29 0 2

0 2 0 2

1 2 0 24

(b) T2 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 5 23 8

0 7 2 1

1 1 35 1

1 1 3 11

(c) T3 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3Ir

L1L2

L32 1 2 46

1 0 1 22

0 0 1 7

1 0 0 15

(d) T4 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 3 45 2

0 1 6 0

1 1 14 1

1 1 22 0

(e) T5 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 46 3 1

0 14 1 1

1 22 1 1

0 7 1 0

(f) T6 (317 eV)

Figure 3 Matrix plots of the charge transfer numbers for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] In the plots the magnitude of the elements of the4 times 4 matrices are given by the color the numbers give the numerical value (in ) The labels L1 L2 and L3 denote the three ppy ligands Theexcitation hole is plotted on the vertical axis the excited electron on the horizontal axis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

equally to these states The states T4 to T6 (Figures 3d-f) show distinctly dierent plots as opposed to the rst threestates In these cases only one column of the matrix shows signicant contributions meaning that the excited electronis localized on one of the ligands The excitation hole always has its strongest contribution on Ir (46) the secondcontribution (22) is of LLCT type (Li rarrLj i j) and only the third contribution (14ndash15) is of IL type (Li rarrLi )

While the plots shown in Figure 3 provide a compact and rigorous representation of the excitations it is oftenconvenient to further compress the information For this purpose for each state partial sums are computed over allthe contributions that correspond to one of the ve classes of TMC excited states MC MLCT LMCT IL and LLCTHere the IrrarrIr matrix element gives the MC contribution to the state the sum of the IrrarrLi elements gives theMLCT contribution and so on This generic partitioning of the charge transfer number matrix is shown in Figure 4It can be applied to homoleptic complexes or more generally to TMCs where all ligands are treated as equivalentInstead of plotting the whole matrix of ΩI

AB it is now possible to identify one or two dominant contributions andrepresent them in tabular form Naturally the downside of this compression is that some information is lostmdashin thiscase the information about excitation localization on the individual ligands Hence one should carefully decide onthe degree of data compression depending on the application

For the six triplets of [Ir(ppy)3] the results of this analysis are shown in Table 2 It can be readily seen that thesix states form two strongly related sets of states T1 T2 and T3 have almost identical state character contributionsand the three other states likewise Furthermore it can be argued that the obtained numeric values provide moreinsight than that gained above from the NTOs Accordingly it can be seen that the three lowest-lying triplet statesare predominantly ligand-centered with around 50 IL character and only around 35 MLCT In contrast the higherstates are of predominant MLCT (50) character and possess LLCT character as a secondary contribution (31)

The information contained in the table can also be depicted in compact form as shown in Figure 5 where theenergy is depicted with horizontal bars the main state character is indicated by the color of these horizontal barsand the contributions to the state character are shown in stacked bar plots The advantage of this gure is that it canbe easily scaled to a relatively large number of states by simply making the bars narrower For instance 30ndash50 statescan be depicted in a gure of similar size (as will be shown below) while a table conveying the same information for50 states would probably take more than half a page Moreover spotting trends or patterns within the table would bemuch more cumbersome than glancing at the colors of the gure

11

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

HolePo

sition

Electron Position

MC MLCT

LMCT(Ph)3

rarr(Ph)3

IL

IL

IL

LLCT

LLCT

Figure 4 Division of the charge transfer matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states

Table 2 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and most important state character contributions for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym State characterT1 289 A 49 IL 38 MLCTT2 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT3 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT4 317 A+E 49 MLCT 31 LLCTT5 317 A+E 50 MLCT 31 LLCTT6 317 A+E 50 MLCT 32 LLCT

In summary the presented protocol enables a completely automatized quantitative and reproducible assignmentof state characters in TMCs In Sections 41 to 45 we will show that the methodology can be applied benecially incases where a larger number of states are to be analyzed where detailed understanding of ligand eects is needed orto rationalize the eects of geometric modications

32 Charge transfer numbers for spin-mixed states

In TMCs SOC is very relevant due to the large nuclear charge of the metal atom SOC is often included in theelectronic Hamiltonian as a perturbation [41 113ndash116]

H el = HMCH + H SOC (19)

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6020406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

) LLCTILLMCTMLCTMC

29303132

E(e

V)

Figure 5 Decomposition of the charge transfer number matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

12

where HMCH is the molecular Coulomb Hamiltonian (MCH) [117] which contains the (scalar relativistic) kinetic energyand Coulomb potential energies of the electrons In practice one usually rst computes a number of eigenstatesof the MCH (ΨMCH also called spin-free states) eg singlets and triplets and subsequently evaluates the SOCmatrix elements within this set of states The spin-orbit-coupled states (or diagonal states) can then be obtained ina perturbative fashion by a diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix where the diagonal elements contain theenergies of the MCH states and the o-diagonal elements are the SOCs The approximation of this step is neglectingthe SOC matrix elements with all higher states not computed in the rst step The diagonalization of HMCHmdashwithelements HMCH

I J = 〈ΨMCHI |H el |ΨMCH

J 〉mdashcan be written as

Hdiag = UdaggerHMCHU (20)

where U is the eigenvector matrix of HMCH The matrix U allows reconstructing the wave function of the diagonalstate in terms of the MCH states

|Ψdiagα 〉 =

sumI

|ΨMCHI 〉UIα (21)

Assuming that the ground state Ψ0 is not aected by this transformation which is often a good approximation the1TDM between the ground state and an excited diagonal state is given by

T αr s =langΨ0

adaggerr as Ψdiagα

rang (22)

which after insertion of Equation (21) reads

T αr s =sumI

langΨ0

adaggerr as ΨMCHI

rangUIα =

sumI

T Ir sUIα (23)

Insertion into Equation (17) shows that the same relations also holds for the orthogonalized matrices ie

T αr s =sumI

T Ir sUIα (24)

and Equation (16) nally leads to

ΩαAB =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ α

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

T ImicroνT

Jmicroν =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ αΩIminusJAB (25)

Here the diagonal elements ΩIminusIAB are equivalent to the charge transfer numbers ΩI

AB of the MCH states as denedabove and the o-diagonal ΩIminusJ

AB terms are computed in an analogous fashion using the 1TDMs of two dierentstates Importantly the evaluation of Equation (25) does not require any signicant additional computational eortwhen compared to the MCH case since all required TI matrices are already available This transformation has beennewly implemented into TheoDORE in the course of this work and we will illustrate its potential below

In order to visualize the resulting data we rst consider a plot of the energies versus oscillator strengths Figure 6shows these two quantities for the lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] The spin-pure (singlet and triplet) states in theMCH representation are denoted by open rings and the spin-mixed states in the diagonal representation by lledcircles As the diagonal states do not have a well-dened total spin value we indicate the total spin expectation valueof these states by color Additionally we draw arrows between the MCH and diagonal states in such a way that it canbe discerned which MCH states contribute to which diagonal states In that way the plot can be used to analyze theelectronic structure of the diagonal states in a visual way At rst glance the complexity of the diagonal states can beappreciated ie in most cases the diagonal states are a linear combination of a large number of dierent MCH states

The reason to show energies versus oscillator strengths is that for [Ir(ppy)3] and related complexes the characterof the lowest diagonal triplet states (the sublevels of theT1) is decisive for its phosphorescence properties Ideally thelowest triplet sublevel should have signicant oscillator strength in order to facilitate fast and ecient phosphorescentdecay It has been shown by theoretical arguments [16 118] that for pseudo-octahedral complexes of trigonal

13

T1T23 T4minus6

S1

S23

X1

28 30 32 34 36

000

001

002

Energy (eV)

Osc

illat

orst

reng

th

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3

〈S2〉

Figure 6 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and oscillator strengths of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] in theMCH representation (open rings) and in the diagonal representation (lled circles) For each state the color indicates the spin multiplicitymdashredor blue for the spin-pure MCH states or any intermediate color for the spin-mixed diagonal states The arrows indicate which MCH statescontribute to which diagonal states with the arrow thickness indicating the weight of the contributions X1 denotes the lowest diagonal state(TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

T1

T23

T4minus6

S1 S2

X1

28 30 32 34 3610

20

30

40

50

60

Energy (eV)

MLC

Tch

arac

ter

()

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3〈S

2〉

Figure 7 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and MLCT character of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] Themeaning of the colors and arrows is the same as in Figure 6 (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

symmetry the lowest triplet sublevel is forbidden from decaying radiatively while the higher sublevels are allowedto phosphoresce This result is recovered in our calculations as can be seen in Figure 6 where the lowest diagonalstate (labeled ldquoX1rdquo) has an oscillator strength of zero The plot also shows that some of the other sublevels of T1T2 and T3 indeed acquire small oscillator strengths Figure 6 also reveals that the intensity of these states does notoriginate from the lowest singlet states S1 minus S3 as one might have assumed initially but it actually derives from therelatively bright S4 and S5 state pair (not shown due to scale) A possible explanation for this nding is given bythe general properties of the spin-orbit operator which govern the magnitude of the SOCs [114] Accordingly ina TMC one can expect very large SOCs between a singlet I and a triplet J if the transition I rarr J is a one-electron

14

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

1 13 13 13

0 16 2 2

0 2 16 2

0 2 2 16

(a) T1 (289 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 19 1 16

1 29 0 2

0 2 0 2

1 2 0 24

(b) T2 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 5 23 8

0 7 2 1

1 1 35 1

1 1 3 11

(c) T3 (293 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3Ir

L1L2

L32 1 2 46

1 0 1 22

0 0 1 7

1 0 0 15

(d) T4 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 3 45 2

0 1 6 0

1 1 14 1

1 1 22 0

(e) T5 (317 eV)

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

2 46 3 1

0 14 1 1

1 22 1 1

0 7 1 0

(f) T6 (317 eV)

Figure 3 Matrix plots of the charge transfer numbers for the rst six triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3] In the plots the magnitude of the elements of the4 times 4 matrices are given by the color the numbers give the numerical value (in ) The labels L1 L2 and L3 denote the three ppy ligands Theexcitation hole is plotted on the vertical axis the excited electron on the horizontal axis (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

equally to these states The states T4 to T6 (Figures 3d-f) show distinctly dierent plots as opposed to the rst threestates In these cases only one column of the matrix shows signicant contributions meaning that the excited electronis localized on one of the ligands The excitation hole always has its strongest contribution on Ir (46) the secondcontribution (22) is of LLCT type (Li rarrLj i j) and only the third contribution (14ndash15) is of IL type (Li rarrLi )

While the plots shown in Figure 3 provide a compact and rigorous representation of the excitations it is oftenconvenient to further compress the information For this purpose for each state partial sums are computed over allthe contributions that correspond to one of the ve classes of TMC excited states MC MLCT LMCT IL and LLCTHere the IrrarrIr matrix element gives the MC contribution to the state the sum of the IrrarrLi elements gives theMLCT contribution and so on This generic partitioning of the charge transfer number matrix is shown in Figure 4It can be applied to homoleptic complexes or more generally to TMCs where all ligands are treated as equivalentInstead of plotting the whole matrix of ΩI

AB it is now possible to identify one or two dominant contributions andrepresent them in tabular form Naturally the downside of this compression is that some information is lostmdashin thiscase the information about excitation localization on the individual ligands Hence one should carefully decide onthe degree of data compression depending on the application

For the six triplets of [Ir(ppy)3] the results of this analysis are shown in Table 2 It can be readily seen that thesix states form two strongly related sets of states T1 T2 and T3 have almost identical state character contributionsand the three other states likewise Furthermore it can be argued that the obtained numeric values provide moreinsight than that gained above from the NTOs Accordingly it can be seen that the three lowest-lying triplet statesare predominantly ligand-centered with around 50 IL character and only around 35 MLCT In contrast the higherstates are of predominant MLCT (50) character and possess LLCT character as a secondary contribution (31)

The information contained in the table can also be depicted in compact form as shown in Figure 5 where theenergy is depicted with horizontal bars the main state character is indicated by the color of these horizontal barsand the contributions to the state character are shown in stacked bar plots The advantage of this gure is that it canbe easily scaled to a relatively large number of states by simply making the bars narrower For instance 30ndash50 statescan be depicted in a gure of similar size (as will be shown below) while a table conveying the same information for50 states would probably take more than half a page Moreover spotting trends or patterns within the table would bemuch more cumbersome than glancing at the colors of the gure

11

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

HolePo

sition

Electron Position

MC MLCT

LMCT(Ph)3

rarr(Ph)3

IL

IL

IL

LLCT

LLCT

Figure 4 Division of the charge transfer matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states

Table 2 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and most important state character contributions for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym State characterT1 289 A 49 IL 38 MLCTT2 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT3 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT4 317 A+E 49 MLCT 31 LLCTT5 317 A+E 50 MLCT 31 LLCTT6 317 A+E 50 MLCT 32 LLCT

In summary the presented protocol enables a completely automatized quantitative and reproducible assignmentof state characters in TMCs In Sections 41 to 45 we will show that the methodology can be applied benecially incases where a larger number of states are to be analyzed where detailed understanding of ligand eects is needed orto rationalize the eects of geometric modications

32 Charge transfer numbers for spin-mixed states

In TMCs SOC is very relevant due to the large nuclear charge of the metal atom SOC is often included in theelectronic Hamiltonian as a perturbation [41 113ndash116]

H el = HMCH + H SOC (19)

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6020406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

) LLCTILLMCTMLCTMC

29303132

E(e

V)

Figure 5 Decomposition of the charge transfer number matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

12

where HMCH is the molecular Coulomb Hamiltonian (MCH) [117] which contains the (scalar relativistic) kinetic energyand Coulomb potential energies of the electrons In practice one usually rst computes a number of eigenstatesof the MCH (ΨMCH also called spin-free states) eg singlets and triplets and subsequently evaluates the SOCmatrix elements within this set of states The spin-orbit-coupled states (or diagonal states) can then be obtained ina perturbative fashion by a diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix where the diagonal elements contain theenergies of the MCH states and the o-diagonal elements are the SOCs The approximation of this step is neglectingthe SOC matrix elements with all higher states not computed in the rst step The diagonalization of HMCHmdashwithelements HMCH

I J = 〈ΨMCHI |H el |ΨMCH

J 〉mdashcan be written as

Hdiag = UdaggerHMCHU (20)

where U is the eigenvector matrix of HMCH The matrix U allows reconstructing the wave function of the diagonalstate in terms of the MCH states

|Ψdiagα 〉 =

sumI

|ΨMCHI 〉UIα (21)

Assuming that the ground state Ψ0 is not aected by this transformation which is often a good approximation the1TDM between the ground state and an excited diagonal state is given by

T αr s =langΨ0

adaggerr as Ψdiagα

rang (22)

which after insertion of Equation (21) reads

T αr s =sumI

langΨ0

adaggerr as ΨMCHI

rangUIα =

sumI

T Ir sUIα (23)

Insertion into Equation (17) shows that the same relations also holds for the orthogonalized matrices ie

T αr s =sumI

T Ir sUIα (24)

and Equation (16) nally leads to

ΩαAB =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ α

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

T ImicroνT

Jmicroν =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ αΩIminusJAB (25)

Here the diagonal elements ΩIminusIAB are equivalent to the charge transfer numbers ΩI

AB of the MCH states as denedabove and the o-diagonal ΩIminusJ

AB terms are computed in an analogous fashion using the 1TDMs of two dierentstates Importantly the evaluation of Equation (25) does not require any signicant additional computational eortwhen compared to the MCH case since all required TI matrices are already available This transformation has beennewly implemented into TheoDORE in the course of this work and we will illustrate its potential below

In order to visualize the resulting data we rst consider a plot of the energies versus oscillator strengths Figure 6shows these two quantities for the lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] The spin-pure (singlet and triplet) states in theMCH representation are denoted by open rings and the spin-mixed states in the diagonal representation by lledcircles As the diagonal states do not have a well-dened total spin value we indicate the total spin expectation valueof these states by color Additionally we draw arrows between the MCH and diagonal states in such a way that it canbe discerned which MCH states contribute to which diagonal states In that way the plot can be used to analyze theelectronic structure of the diagonal states in a visual way At rst glance the complexity of the diagonal states can beappreciated ie in most cases the diagonal states are a linear combination of a large number of dierent MCH states

The reason to show energies versus oscillator strengths is that for [Ir(ppy)3] and related complexes the characterof the lowest diagonal triplet states (the sublevels of theT1) is decisive for its phosphorescence properties Ideally thelowest triplet sublevel should have signicant oscillator strength in order to facilitate fast and ecient phosphorescentdecay It has been shown by theoretical arguments [16 118] that for pseudo-octahedral complexes of trigonal

13

T1T23 T4minus6

S1

S23

X1

28 30 32 34 36

000

001

002

Energy (eV)

Osc

illat

orst

reng

th

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3

〈S2〉

Figure 6 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and oscillator strengths of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] in theMCH representation (open rings) and in the diagonal representation (lled circles) For each state the color indicates the spin multiplicitymdashredor blue for the spin-pure MCH states or any intermediate color for the spin-mixed diagonal states The arrows indicate which MCH statescontribute to which diagonal states with the arrow thickness indicating the weight of the contributions X1 denotes the lowest diagonal state(TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

T1

T23

T4minus6

S1 S2

X1

28 30 32 34 3610

20

30

40

50

60

Energy (eV)

MLC

Tch

arac

ter

()

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3〈S

2〉

Figure 7 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and MLCT character of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] Themeaning of the colors and arrows is the same as in Figure 6 (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

symmetry the lowest triplet sublevel is forbidden from decaying radiatively while the higher sublevels are allowedto phosphoresce This result is recovered in our calculations as can be seen in Figure 6 where the lowest diagonalstate (labeled ldquoX1rdquo) has an oscillator strength of zero The plot also shows that some of the other sublevels of T1T2 and T3 indeed acquire small oscillator strengths Figure 6 also reveals that the intensity of these states does notoriginate from the lowest singlet states S1 minus S3 as one might have assumed initially but it actually derives from therelatively bright S4 and S5 state pair (not shown due to scale) A possible explanation for this nding is given bythe general properties of the spin-orbit operator which govern the magnitude of the SOCs [114] Accordingly ina TMC one can expect very large SOCs between a singlet I and a triplet J if the transition I rarr J is a one-electron

14

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

Ir L1 L2 L3

IrL1

L2L3

HolePo

sition

Electron Position

MC MLCT

LMCT(Ph)3

rarr(Ph)3

IL

IL

IL

LLCT

LLCT

Figure 4 Division of the charge transfer matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states

Table 2 Excitation energies (E) symmetry (Sym) and most important state character contributions for the six lowest triplet states of [Ir(ppy)3](TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

E (eV) Sym State characterT1 289 A 49 IL 38 MLCTT2 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT3 293 E 53 IL 35 MLCTT4 317 A+E 49 MLCT 31 LLCTT5 317 A+E 50 MLCT 31 LLCTT6 317 A+E 50 MLCT 32 LLCT

In summary the presented protocol enables a completely automatized quantitative and reproducible assignmentof state characters in TMCs In Sections 41 to 45 we will show that the methodology can be applied benecially incases where a larger number of states are to be analyzed where detailed understanding of ligand eects is needed orto rationalize the eects of geometric modications

32 Charge transfer numbers for spin-mixed states

In TMCs SOC is very relevant due to the large nuclear charge of the metal atom SOC is often included in theelectronic Hamiltonian as a perturbation [41 113ndash116]

H el = HMCH + H SOC (19)

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6020406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

) LLCTILLMCTMLCTMC

29303132

E(e

V)

Figure 5 Decomposition of the charge transfer number matrix of [Ir(ppy)3] into the ve text-book classes of TMC excited states (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

12

where HMCH is the molecular Coulomb Hamiltonian (MCH) [117] which contains the (scalar relativistic) kinetic energyand Coulomb potential energies of the electrons In practice one usually rst computes a number of eigenstatesof the MCH (ΨMCH also called spin-free states) eg singlets and triplets and subsequently evaluates the SOCmatrix elements within this set of states The spin-orbit-coupled states (or diagonal states) can then be obtained ina perturbative fashion by a diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix where the diagonal elements contain theenergies of the MCH states and the o-diagonal elements are the SOCs The approximation of this step is neglectingthe SOC matrix elements with all higher states not computed in the rst step The diagonalization of HMCHmdashwithelements HMCH

I J = 〈ΨMCHI |H el |ΨMCH

J 〉mdashcan be written as

Hdiag = UdaggerHMCHU (20)

where U is the eigenvector matrix of HMCH The matrix U allows reconstructing the wave function of the diagonalstate in terms of the MCH states

|Ψdiagα 〉 =

sumI

|ΨMCHI 〉UIα (21)

Assuming that the ground state Ψ0 is not aected by this transformation which is often a good approximation the1TDM between the ground state and an excited diagonal state is given by

T αr s =langΨ0

adaggerr as Ψdiagα

rang (22)

which after insertion of Equation (21) reads

T αr s =sumI

langΨ0

adaggerr as ΨMCHI

rangUIα =

sumI

T Ir sUIα (23)

Insertion into Equation (17) shows that the same relations also holds for the orthogonalized matrices ie

T αr s =sumI

T Ir sUIα (24)

and Equation (16) nally leads to

ΩαAB =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ α

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

T ImicroνT

Jmicroν =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ αΩIminusJAB (25)

Here the diagonal elements ΩIminusIAB are equivalent to the charge transfer numbers ΩI

AB of the MCH states as denedabove and the o-diagonal ΩIminusJ

AB terms are computed in an analogous fashion using the 1TDMs of two dierentstates Importantly the evaluation of Equation (25) does not require any signicant additional computational eortwhen compared to the MCH case since all required TI matrices are already available This transformation has beennewly implemented into TheoDORE in the course of this work and we will illustrate its potential below

In order to visualize the resulting data we rst consider a plot of the energies versus oscillator strengths Figure 6shows these two quantities for the lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] The spin-pure (singlet and triplet) states in theMCH representation are denoted by open rings and the spin-mixed states in the diagonal representation by lledcircles As the diagonal states do not have a well-dened total spin value we indicate the total spin expectation valueof these states by color Additionally we draw arrows between the MCH and diagonal states in such a way that it canbe discerned which MCH states contribute to which diagonal states In that way the plot can be used to analyze theelectronic structure of the diagonal states in a visual way At rst glance the complexity of the diagonal states can beappreciated ie in most cases the diagonal states are a linear combination of a large number of dierent MCH states

The reason to show energies versus oscillator strengths is that for [Ir(ppy)3] and related complexes the characterof the lowest diagonal triplet states (the sublevels of theT1) is decisive for its phosphorescence properties Ideally thelowest triplet sublevel should have signicant oscillator strength in order to facilitate fast and ecient phosphorescentdecay It has been shown by theoretical arguments [16 118] that for pseudo-octahedral complexes of trigonal

13

T1T23 T4minus6

S1

S23

X1

28 30 32 34 36

000

001

002

Energy (eV)

Osc

illat

orst

reng

th

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3

〈S2〉

Figure 6 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and oscillator strengths of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] in theMCH representation (open rings) and in the diagonal representation (lled circles) For each state the color indicates the spin multiplicitymdashredor blue for the spin-pure MCH states or any intermediate color for the spin-mixed diagonal states The arrows indicate which MCH statescontribute to which diagonal states with the arrow thickness indicating the weight of the contributions X1 denotes the lowest diagonal state(TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

T1

T23

T4minus6

S1 S2

X1

28 30 32 34 3610

20

30

40

50

60

Energy (eV)

MLC

Tch

arac

ter

()

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3〈S

2〉

Figure 7 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and MLCT character of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] Themeaning of the colors and arrows is the same as in Figure 6 (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

symmetry the lowest triplet sublevel is forbidden from decaying radiatively while the higher sublevels are allowedto phosphoresce This result is recovered in our calculations as can be seen in Figure 6 where the lowest diagonalstate (labeled ldquoX1rdquo) has an oscillator strength of zero The plot also shows that some of the other sublevels of T1T2 and T3 indeed acquire small oscillator strengths Figure 6 also reveals that the intensity of these states does notoriginate from the lowest singlet states S1 minus S3 as one might have assumed initially but it actually derives from therelatively bright S4 and S5 state pair (not shown due to scale) A possible explanation for this nding is given bythe general properties of the spin-orbit operator which govern the magnitude of the SOCs [114] Accordingly ina TMC one can expect very large SOCs between a singlet I and a triplet J if the transition I rarr J is a one-electron

14

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

where HMCH is the molecular Coulomb Hamiltonian (MCH) [117] which contains the (scalar relativistic) kinetic energyand Coulomb potential energies of the electrons In practice one usually rst computes a number of eigenstatesof the MCH (ΨMCH also called spin-free states) eg singlets and triplets and subsequently evaluates the SOCmatrix elements within this set of states The spin-orbit-coupled states (or diagonal states) can then be obtained ina perturbative fashion by a diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matrix where the diagonal elements contain theenergies of the MCH states and the o-diagonal elements are the SOCs The approximation of this step is neglectingthe SOC matrix elements with all higher states not computed in the rst step The diagonalization of HMCHmdashwithelements HMCH

I J = 〈ΨMCHI |H el |ΨMCH

J 〉mdashcan be written as

Hdiag = UdaggerHMCHU (20)

where U is the eigenvector matrix of HMCH The matrix U allows reconstructing the wave function of the diagonalstate in terms of the MCH states

|Ψdiagα 〉 =

sumI

|ΨMCHI 〉UIα (21)

Assuming that the ground state Ψ0 is not aected by this transformation which is often a good approximation the1TDM between the ground state and an excited diagonal state is given by

T αr s =langΨ0

adaggerr as Ψdiagα

rang (22)

which after insertion of Equation (21) reads

T αr s =sumI

langΨ0

adaggerr as ΨMCHI

rangUIα =

sumI

T Ir sUIα (23)

Insertion into Equation (17) shows that the same relations also holds for the orthogonalized matrices ie

T αr s =sumI

T Ir sUIα (24)

and Equation (16) nally leads to

ΩαAB =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ α

summicro isinA

sumν isinB

T ImicroνT

Jmicroν =

sumI

sumJ

UIαUJ αΩIminusJAB (25)

Here the diagonal elements ΩIminusIAB are equivalent to the charge transfer numbers ΩI

AB of the MCH states as denedabove and the o-diagonal ΩIminusJ

AB terms are computed in an analogous fashion using the 1TDMs of two dierentstates Importantly the evaluation of Equation (25) does not require any signicant additional computational eortwhen compared to the MCH case since all required TI matrices are already available This transformation has beennewly implemented into TheoDORE in the course of this work and we will illustrate its potential below

In order to visualize the resulting data we rst consider a plot of the energies versus oscillator strengths Figure 6shows these two quantities for the lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] The spin-pure (singlet and triplet) states in theMCH representation are denoted by open rings and the spin-mixed states in the diagonal representation by lledcircles As the diagonal states do not have a well-dened total spin value we indicate the total spin expectation valueof these states by color Additionally we draw arrows between the MCH and diagonal states in such a way that it canbe discerned which MCH states contribute to which diagonal states In that way the plot can be used to analyze theelectronic structure of the diagonal states in a visual way At rst glance the complexity of the diagonal states can beappreciated ie in most cases the diagonal states are a linear combination of a large number of dierent MCH states

The reason to show energies versus oscillator strengths is that for [Ir(ppy)3] and related complexes the characterof the lowest diagonal triplet states (the sublevels of theT1) is decisive for its phosphorescence properties Ideally thelowest triplet sublevel should have signicant oscillator strength in order to facilitate fast and ecient phosphorescentdecay It has been shown by theoretical arguments [16 118] that for pseudo-octahedral complexes of trigonal

13

T1T23 T4minus6

S1

S23

X1

28 30 32 34 36

000

001

002

Energy (eV)

Osc

illat

orst

reng

th

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3

〈S2〉

Figure 6 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and oscillator strengths of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] in theMCH representation (open rings) and in the diagonal representation (lled circles) For each state the color indicates the spin multiplicitymdashredor blue for the spin-pure MCH states or any intermediate color for the spin-mixed diagonal states The arrows indicate which MCH statescontribute to which diagonal states with the arrow thickness indicating the weight of the contributions X1 denotes the lowest diagonal state(TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

T1

T23

T4minus6

S1 S2

X1

28 30 32 34 3610

20

30

40

50

60

Energy (eV)

MLC

Tch

arac

ter

()

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3〈S

2〉

Figure 7 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and MLCT character of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] Themeaning of the colors and arrows is the same as in Figure 6 (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

symmetry the lowest triplet sublevel is forbidden from decaying radiatively while the higher sublevels are allowedto phosphoresce This result is recovered in our calculations as can be seen in Figure 6 where the lowest diagonalstate (labeled ldquoX1rdquo) has an oscillator strength of zero The plot also shows that some of the other sublevels of T1T2 and T3 indeed acquire small oscillator strengths Figure 6 also reveals that the intensity of these states does notoriginate from the lowest singlet states S1 minus S3 as one might have assumed initially but it actually derives from therelatively bright S4 and S5 state pair (not shown due to scale) A possible explanation for this nding is given bythe general properties of the spin-orbit operator which govern the magnitude of the SOCs [114] Accordingly ina TMC one can expect very large SOCs between a singlet I and a triplet J if the transition I rarr J is a one-electron

14

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

T1T23 T4minus6

S1

S23

X1

28 30 32 34 36

000

001

002

Energy (eV)

Osc

illat

orst

reng

th

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3

〈S2〉

Figure 6 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and oscillator strengths of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] in theMCH representation (open rings) and in the diagonal representation (lled circles) For each state the color indicates the spin multiplicitymdashredor blue for the spin-pure MCH states or any intermediate color for the spin-mixed diagonal states The arrows indicate which MCH statescontribute to which diagonal states with the arrow thickness indicating the weight of the contributions X1 denotes the lowest diagonal state(TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

T1

T23

T4minus6

S1 S2

X1

28 30 32 34 3610

20

30

40

50

60

Energy (eV)

MLC

Tch

arac

ter

()

MCH statesDiagonal states

1

3〈S

2〉

Figure 7 Spin-orbit coupling decomposition plot showing energies and MLCT character of the few lowest excited states of [Ir(ppy)3] Themeaning of the colors and arrows is the same as in Figure 6 (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) COSMO(water))

symmetry the lowest triplet sublevel is forbidden from decaying radiatively while the higher sublevels are allowedto phosphoresce This result is recovered in our calculations as can be seen in Figure 6 where the lowest diagonalstate (labeled ldquoX1rdquo) has an oscillator strength of zero The plot also shows that some of the other sublevels of T1T2 and T3 indeed acquire small oscillator strengths Figure 6 also reveals that the intensity of these states does notoriginate from the lowest singlet states S1 minus S3 as one might have assumed initially but it actually derives from therelatively bright S4 and S5 state pair (not shown due to scale) A possible explanation for this nding is given bythe general properties of the spin-orbit operator which govern the magnitude of the SOCs [114] Accordingly ina TMC one can expect very large SOCs between a singlet I and a triplet J if the transition I rarr J is a one-electron

14

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

excitation localized on the metal atom For example SOCs will be large if I and J are two MLCT states involvingdierent d orbitals and the same π lowast orbital Now S1 minus S3 and T1 minusT3 all constitute excitations out of the Ha orbital(see Figure 1) leading to rather small SOCs between these states and therefore to only minor intensity borrowing

In Figure 7 we show the results of a charge transfer number analysis including SOC The gure is analogous tothe previous one but it plots the MLCT contribution against the energy of the states The most interesting aspect ofFigure 7 is to see which states exchange MLCT character and how the energy is aected by that For the low-energygroup of triplet states (T1T2 andT3) it can be seen that when they spin-orbit couple to the higher states they acquireadditional MLCT contributions whereas the higher states (specically T4minus6) lose MLCT contributions Anotherobservation is that states with less MLCT character (on the bottom) do not get shifted in energy as much as thestates with larger MLCT contributions (on the top) This is a well-known eect [15 16] but here it is plotted in acomprehensive way Finally it can be seen that in general the MCH states show more extreme positions on theMLCT scale ie the MCH states can be found at very low and very high MLCT percentages whereas the diagonalstates are generally more ldquoaveragerdquo

33 Correlations between charge transfer numbers

In the case of multiple excited states the charge transfer numbers constitute a three-dimensionalnstatestimesnfragtimesnfragarray With such a data set it is possible that some of the charge transfer numbers are linearly correlated witheach other ie if one charge transfer number is large for any state another number will also be large for that stateand vice versa Such correlations might be due to dierent reasons for example due to the fact that excitationsbetween MOs are delocalized over multiple fragments or due to simultaneous coupled excitations involving multiplefragments

In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (bipy=22rsquo-bipyridine) this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examinedlater in section 45 For now it is sucient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexesare discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between RerarrL and (CO)3rarrL excitations [29 57] and in thecase of halogeno-complexes also XrarrL with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (eg bipy) [119 120]

This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8 which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] For the charge transfer analysis we have divided the moleculeinto four fragments (i) Re (ii) Cl (iii) (CO)3 and (iv) bipy The resulting types of excitations are represented indierent colors As can be seen 31 out of the 40 shown states are a mixture of three excitation types Rerarrbipy (inlight gray) Clrarrbipy (in light red) and (CO)3rarrbipy (in light blue) Moreover it can also be seen that the three typesare correlated in the sense that if one is small the others tend to be small too This is particularly notable for theRerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions

These correlations are best identied in a scatter plot like shown in Figure 9 which plots pairs of charge transfernumbers (ie contributions to the state characters) for all states In (a) it can be seen that the Rerarrbipy and (CO)3rarrbipy contributions are very well linearly correlated with a (Pearson) correlation coecient of r = 098 As acontrasting example in (b) one can see that Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy are not correlated at all the correlation coecienthere is r = minus014 Other pairs of charge transfer numbers are also correlated in a similar manner (not shown) egRerarrCl with (CO)3rarrCl or RerarrRe with (CO)3rarrRe which suggests that the fragments Re and (CO)3 are themselvescorrelated

The correlation between the dierent charge transfer numbers shows that the choice of the fragments is notnecessary straightforward Because the fragments Re and (CO)3 are almost perfectly correlated no signicantinformation is gained by computing their charge transfer numbers separately Instead one could merge the twofragments into a Re(CO)3 unit keeping all essential information while removing redundant information by reducingthe total number of fragments for this molecule from four to three (ie Re(CO)3 Cl and bipy) Besides achievinga reduction of data the example above shows that splitting Re(CO)3 into two fragments is not adequate from achemical viewpoint It is well known that metal carbonyls have strongly covalent metal-carbon bonds and signicantbackbonding from metal d orbitals to CO π lowast orbitals This bonding situation leads to orbitals which are delocalized

15

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

S1 S10 S20T1 T10 T200

20

40

60

80

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

RerarrRe ClrarrRe (CO)3rarrReRerarr(CO)3 Clrarr(CO)3 (CO)3rarr(CO)3Rerarrbipy Clrarrbipy (CO)3rarrbipy bipyrarrbipy

2025303540

E(e

V)

Figure 8 Excitation energies (horizontal bars) oscillator strength (shading behind horizontal bars) and charge transfer numbers (stacked barplots) for the rst 20 singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] Note that some charge transfer contributions (eg RerarrCl ClrarrCl (CO)3rarrCl) are omitted for clarity therefore the stacked bars do not add up to exactly one (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(a) Correlation Re ndash (CO)3

ΩRerarrbipy ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

bipy

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100

(b) Correlation Re ndash Cl

ΩRerarrbipy ()

ΩClrarr

bipy

()

Figure 9 Correlations between the (a) Rerarrbipy and (CO)3 rarrbipy contributions and (b) the Rerarrbipy and Clrarrbipy contributions for the rst 20singlet and 20 triplet states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

over the metal and the carbonyls such that excitations always involve both parts of the molecule What is exceptionalin the previous correlation analysis is that it reveals these delocalized excitations from the physically well dened1TDM alone without inspecting any single orbital

Based on the above reasoning the correlation between dierent fragments can be used as a measure to decidehow to choose the fragments in a charge transfer analysis In general one would like to form fragments whosecharge transfer numbers do not signicantly correlate in order to maximize the amount of information containedThis is especially interesting for situations where the choice of fragments is not immediately obvious or where thechemically motivated intuitive fragmentation might not be optimal

Here we propose a new scheme which nds correlations between charge transfer numbers from any givenfragmentation and suggests how these fragments could be combined to form a smaller set of fragments for furtherconsideration This new scheme consists of three steps (i) compute the full correlation matrix between all fragments(ii) perform a hierarchical clustering [121 122] based on the correlation matrix and (iii) cut the cluster hierarchy at adesired level to learn which fragments could be merged

For this scheme we rst need a way to quantify the correlation between fragments This has to be distinguished

16

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

from the correlations above which were between pairs of charge transfer numbers The dierence is in the fact thateach fragment is involved in multiple charge transfer numbers To nd correlations between fragments we proposethe following To compute the correlation between fragments A and B we need to consider all excitations Ararr Xand B rarr X for all fragments X in this way we can nd whether the holes on A and B are correlated This leads tothe following equation for the hole covariance matrix Vh

V hAB =

1Nstates

sumX

sumI

ΩIAXΩI

BX minus1

N 2states

sumX

(sumI

ΩIAX

) (sumI

ΩIBX

) (26)

which is more precisely the covariance matrix of the hole summed over all possible electron positions X Here indexI runs over the excited states included in the statistical analysis and A B and X run over the atomic fragments Thematrix elementV h

AB describes whether fragments A and B tend to simultaneously release electron density to the sameacceptor fragment during excitation

Likewise for the electron correlation between A and B we need to look at all excitations X rarr A and X rarr B forall fragments X This gives rise to a similar equation for Ve just with the following index replacements AX rArr XAand BX rArr XB The matrix element V e

AB then describes whether A and B tend to simultaneously receive part of theexcited electron from the same donor fragment

By normalization one can obtain the hole correlation matrix

ChAB =

V hABradic

V hAAV

hBB

(27)

which contains the Pearson correlation coecients (called r above) which measure the linear correlations betweenall pairs of fragments A and B The electron correlation matrix Ce can be computed analogously

Based on these two matrices in principle one could nd if any of the fragments behave identically in all excitedstates (Ch

AB = 1 or CeAB = 1) and one could redene these two fragments as a single one However in general it is

not trivial to nd such pairs and a manual inspection of the correlation matrices might be subjective and inecientInstead we propose to employ hierarchical clustering analysis to nd the groups of correlated fragments In order todo this we need to dene a metric which allows converting the correlation matrices into distance matrices

RhAB =

radic12

(1 minusCh

AB

) (28)

and analogously for the electron distance matrix Re If the correlation coecient CAB is 1 then the distance RABwill be zero and for smaller correlation coecients the distance will increase The usage of the square root inthe denition ensures that the computed distances follow the triangular inequality [123] which is helpful for theclustering step Basically it ensures that if (i) A and B have a small distance and (ii) B and C have a small distancethen (iii) A and C also have a suciently small distance

With the distance matrix at hand we can now carry out the hierarchical clustering algorithm We employ thecommon agglomerative algorithm where initially all fragments are separate clusters and are merged sequentiallyuntil only one cluster remains A description of the algorithm and further details are given in the ComputationalDetails section in appendix A

Figure 10 shows an example of such a hierarchical clustering analysis based on the data presented for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Figure 8 The gure contains three parts (i) a depiction of the molecular geometry with the fragmentationindicated by the numbering of the atoms (ii) a matrix plot of the correlation matrix of the excitation hole Ch and(iii) the dendrogram which presents the result of the hierarchical clustering step In the dendrogram it is shown howthe six fragments are subsequently merged to yield intermediate clusters which eventually are all merged to a singlesystem Importantly the horizontal (to the left) axis depicts the r value between the merged clusters For examplefragments 4 and 5 (the COeq fragments) have a correlation coecient of about 099 (most likely due to symmetry)whereas the value for fragments 2 and 3 is about 075 Moreover the correlation coecient between fragment 1 (Re)

17

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

r10080500

Holeanalysis

100500-05-10

1

1

4

4

5

5

6

6

2

2

3

3

Definition of fragments6

6 66

2

6 64

46 66 6

166

566

5

3

66 66 6

3

6

Figure 10 Example of the hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the correlations between the excitation hole of all fragments Thedenition of the six fragments is shown on the top where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 345 are the three CO molecules and 6 is bipy The bottompart shows the correlation matrix Ch as a color-coded matrix plot Next to the matrix is the dendrogram showing the clustering of the matrix Theblack vertical line divides this dendrogram thus forming the three clusters (blue green and gray) which are also indicated in the moleculargeometry plot (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

and cluster 4+5 (COeq)2 is approximately 085 The larger clusters 1+4+5 (Re(CO)2) 2+3 (COCl) and 6 (bipy) are notcorrelated at all with values which are slightly negative This indicates a negative correlation between the largeclusters which is due to the fact that the sum of all charge transfer numbers is equal to 1 (at least in the present TDAcalculations) so that as one number grows larger all other values tend to decrease

Based on the dendrogram the nal step of the analysis is to extract a sensible clustering of the fragments In orderto do so one denes a threshold value at which the dendrogram is cut In the given example this threshold is indicatedby the black vertical line within the dendrogram at a value of about r = 045 For this particular dendrogram ofcourse choosing a value anywhere between 00 and 075 would have accomplished the same partitioning so theactual problem is to choose above which merger the cut should be performed Here we employ a heuristic whichlooks for the largest gap between two subsequent mergers and denes the threshold accordingly In this way onecan separate highly correlated clusters from uncorrelated clusters

The clustering analysis performed in Figure 10 is quite interesting as it proposes yet another fragmentationscheme dierent from the one chosen in Figure 9 In the automatic clustering approach it appears that the Cl atomis mostly correlated with the trans-standing carbonyl whereas the equatorial carbonyls are correlated with the metalThe reason for this dierent nding is that Figure 9 initially considers all CO molecules as a single fragment whereasFigure 10 considers them separately

Both Figures 9 and Figure 10 only consider correlation matrix for the excitation hole but a similar analysis should

18

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

r10080500

Hol

ean

alys

is

100500-05-10

9

9

12

12

17

17

20

20

10

10

13

13

11

11

14

14

16

16

19

19

15

15

18

18

1

1

5

5

8

8

4

4

7

7

2

2

3

3

6

6

r

10

08

05

00

Electron analysis

2

2

3

3

6

6

1

1

4

4

7

7

5

5

8

8

9

9

20

20

14

14

15

15

11

11

18

18

12

12

17

17

13

13

16

16

10

10

19

19

r

-04-0200020406

08

10

Combined (H+E) analysis

Automatic fragmentation

2 3 6 1 4 7 5 8 12 17 13 16 10 19 9 20 14 15 11 18

18

17 1819

2

17 197

416 2016 15

11413

5913

8

3

1012 1012 11

6

11

Figure 11 Example of the full-atomic hierarchical clustering of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] using the combined correlations of excitation hole and excitedelectron The denition of the 20 fragments is shown on the right where fragment 1 is Re 2 is Cl 3+64+75+8 are the three CO molecules andfragments 9 to 20 make up bipy The left part shows the correlation matrices Ch (lower left triangular matrix) and Ce (upper right) as color-codedmatrix plots Next to the matrices are the dendrograms showing the clustering of the matrices yielding dierent results for the two analyzes Onthe top right the dendrogram of the combined analysis is presented where the black vertical line forms two clusters (blue and green) which arealso indicated in the molecular geometry plot The orange lines in the molecular geometry plot indicate which atoms correlate well with eachother (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

be done for the excited electron so that in the end one obtains two independent clusterings Since this might beinconvenient we suggest to combine the hole and electron distance matrices in

RcombinedMN = min

(ReMN R

hMN

) (29)

and perform the clustering with this combined distance measure In this way one obtains only a single clusteringwhich considers both hole and electron correlation Here the use of the minimum function ensures that two fragmentsare already considered as correlated if only hole or electron are correlated

In order to obtain an unbiased clustering of the molecule it is best to provide as little as possible prior knowledgeabout the fragmentation to the clustering procedure This can be achieved by calculating the charge transfernumbers for an atomic fragmentation scheme and let the clustering procedure gure out all correlations betweenthe atoms this could be called an ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation scheme An example is presented in Figure 11 There the[Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] molecule is initially divided into 20 fragmentsmdasheach non-hydrogen atom is treated as a separatefragment The hydrogens are included in the fragments of the atom to which they are bonded because hydrogensare not signicantly participating in the excitations hence do not correlate with any other atom and consequentlywould be clustered incorrectly

Admiringly the automatic ldquoab initiordquo fragmentation procedure fully recovered the results of the above manualfragmentation It detected the bipy molecule as one independent subunit of the complex The Re(Cl)(CO)3 moietywas identied as a second subunit where Re and (CO)3 show tighter correlation than Cl with either of the two

19

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

The fact that Re(Cl)(CO)3 is a strongly correlating subunit is consistent with previous experimental ndings in theRef [120] There the authors used the vibrationally active pseudohalide NCS showing that in [Re(NCS)(CO)3(NN)](NN=diimine) there is mixing between RerarrNN and NCSrarrNN excitations

The combined analysis also shows that the correlation level of Cl with Re(CO)3 is similar to some of the correlationsinside the bipy ligand This could indicate that by subdividing the bipy into smaller fragments one could get additionalinformation from the charge transfer number analysis which might allow distinguishing excited states by the locationof the excited electron on the bipy This can be understood in the sense that there are multiple π lowast orbitals on bipywhich can participate in the excitation process and these orbitals show slightly dierent localization on the dierentatoms

We should note that the statistical analysis of the fragment correlations depends on the input data and inparticular on the number and energy range of the states considered in the analysis This is especially relevant forsystems where one state character appears only at low energies and another character only at high energies In sucha case including only the low-energy states in the correlation analysis is likely to lead to dierent results than wouldbe obtained with the full set of states However when the correlation analysis is done in order to nd a fragmentationscheme to be used subsequently it is best to perform the analysis with the same set of states as will be analyzed later(eg in molecular dynamics) Furthermore it might be advantageous to include computations at multiple geometriesin the correlation analysis to remove any possible bias coming from the choice of the geometry

4 Case studies

The quantication of excited state-localization and charge transfer by means of TheoDORE analysis was alreadyexemplied in Sections 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] In the following the usefulness of this analysis is showcased forve dierent aspects of excited-state quantum chemistry which aects the state characters (i) inuence of nuclearrelaxation (ii) inuence of SOCs (iii) inuence of the ligand sphere (iv) inuence of the metal center and (v) inuenceof the electronic structure method

41 Inuence of nuclear relaxation nonradiative decay of [Ir(ppy)3]

Among phosphorescent emitters organometallic Ir(III) complexes have been demonstrated to be exceptionallyuseful [15 16] due to their relatively short radiative triplet lifetime (about 16 micros in the high-temperature limit[15]) and high phosphorescence quantum yields (about 90 [15]) The emission wavelength of Ir(III) complexessignicantly depends on the ligands and their substituents which can be used to control their properties [124ndash129]Luminescent Ir(III) complexes can be used as well in light-emitting electrochemical cells [130] or as biological probesimaging reagents and photocytotoxic agents [131]

In the past decades a number of theoretical studies mainly based on TD-DFT with or without inclusion ofSOCs have been devoted to this class of complexes [81 128 129 132ndash144] This huge research activity has providedimportant insight into the character and emissive properties of the low-lying triplet states which are responsible forthe usefulness of the complexes

A critical property of [Ir(ppy)3] is its very long nonradiative decay time (about 15ndash30 micros in the high-temperaturelimit [15]) which is a prerequisite for a useful phosphorescence yield [15 16 118] In this and related TMCs one ofthe most important nonradiative decay pathway leads from the T1 minimum of MLCT or ILLLCT character to statesof MC character Computational studies [15 145ndash147] showed that these MC states involve strong elongation orbreaking of metal-ligand bonds accompanied by the formation of a trigonal-bipyramidal metal coordination andhence lead to easily accessible T1S0 crossings These nonradiative decay routes are one of the main limitationsof blue emitters because there the emissive states are shifted to higher energies such that they come closer to theMC states Hence in this section we investigate the contamination of the lowest triplet state by MC states along apossible nonradiative decay route

20

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

020406080

Character

ofT1(

)

IrrarrIr IrrarrL1 IrrarrL2 IrrarrL3 L1rarrL1

L2rarrL2 L3rarrL3 L1rarrL2 L3rarrL2 LrarrIr

S0

T1

T23

S1

S23

00051015202530354045

Energy

(eV)

to 33Aring

192021222324

Reaction Coordinate

Bon

dleng

th(Aring

) IrndashC IrndashN

S0 min T1 min S0T1 XP S0T1 MXP

Figure 12 Analysis of the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] On the top the four optimized geometries of [Ir(ppy)3] (S0 minimum T1minimum S0T1 crossing point and S0T1 minimum energy crossing point see the supporting information for coordinates) are shown Redshade marks the regions where the most signicant geometric changes (eg bond elongation) occur The upper plot shows the energy proles ofthe few lowest states of [Ir(ppy)3] along a linear interpolation in internal coordinates with the black dots indicating where the minima or crossingpoints are located The middle bar plot shows the composition of the T1 state along the scan according to a TheoDORE analysis The bottom plotshows the RendashC and RendashN bond lengths along the interpolation scan where the bond length of the dissociating bond is truncated for the sake ofvisibility (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P) gas phase)

Figure 12 shows a potential energy prole for the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir(ppy)3] from the S0 minimumto the T1 minimum and further on to two T1S0 crossing points These four critical points are indicated in Figure 12by four black dots The S0 minimum has C3 symmetry (left-most black dot) whereas the T1 minimum is slightlynon-symmetric due to a localization of the excitation on one of the ligands denoted here as L2 While locating theT1S0 crossing points the optimization yielded two qualitatively dierent crossing geometries The rst geometry(denoted as S0T1 XP XP=crossing point) is not a true minimum on the crossing seam but is signicant because itis a (relatively low-energy) crossing point where the octahedral coordination of Ir is retained Nevertheless thisXP shows a strong elongation of the Ir-N bond to L1 and additionally an out-of-plane puckering of the N atom ofL2 The second crossing geometry corresponds to a minimum on the crossing seam (hence denoted as S0T1 MXPMXP=minimum energy crossing point) and shows a trigonal bipyramidal geometry where one of the pyridinegroups is detached from the Ir rotated and stacked on top of one of the other ligands

The SOCs betweenT1 and S0 are approximately 400 cmminus1 at the XP and 1100 cmminus1 at the MXP showing that both

21

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

points might enable ISC if accessed The energy prole shows that the rst XP is approximately 1 eV above the T1minimum The MXP is only 025 eV above the T1 minimum however there might be a large barrier (07 eV accordingto the linear interpolation scan which gives a upper bound) between the XP and MXP Hence both crossing pointsare too high in energy to be relevant even at room temperature The barriers are also signicantly larger than theones previously reported in the literature Treboux et al[145] reported a barrier of 028 eV to reach an MC state fromthe T1 minimum based on a relaxed scan and Sajoto et al[146] reported a value of 5000 cmminus1 (06 eV) estimatedfrom computed and experimental data of related complexes However it should be noted that here we actuallyoptimized a T1S0 crossing point (for the rst time for this complex to the best of our knowledge) and that thevalues are therefore not necessarily comparable Another possible reason for this discrepancy might be that ourlinear-interpolation-in-internal coordinate scan leads to a too large barrier and there is actually a lower-energypathway from the T1 minimum to the MXP

In their report on the nonradiative decay pathway of [Ir (ppy)3] Treboux et al[145] remarked ldquoThe preciseassignation of the respective characters of MLCT and LC is complicated by the presence of a strong metal-ligandmixing in the orbitals rdquo Consequently the charge transfer analysis of TheoDORE is ideally suited to disentanglethis complicated electronic structure situation In the bottom panel of Figure 12 we decompose the transition density(from S0 to T1) into the ten most important contributions using four fragments (Ir and each ppy separately) whichwere found to be weakly correlated by a correlation analysis like in Section 33 As already seen in Section 31 at theS0 minimum geometry theT1 state is a mixture of 40 MLCT character and 50 IL character both equally distributedamong the three ligands (L1 L2 L3) It is very interesting to note that as soon as the trigonal symmetry is broken(moving from the left-most data point to the right) the excitation very quickly localizes on L2 as those ligandrsquos bondlengths are changed Hence the T1 character becomes a mixture of 30 IrrarrL2 and 60 L2 rarrL2

When approaching the T1S0 XP the wave function composition changes again with a shift towards a largerIrrarrL2 contribution (40) The previously large L2 rarrL2 contribution of the T1 minimum is changed to an equalmixture of L1 rarrL2 L2 rarrL2 and L3 rarrL2 Interestingly at this T1S0 geometry there is almost no contribution(3) of MC states to the T1 Instead the excitation can be regarded as an excitation from a partially metal-localizedorbital to an orbital on the strongly puckered pyridine unit of L2 This kind of puckering of aromatic systems ismore commonly known from smaller organic molecules for example nucleobases [148] An interesting ansatz forcontrolling nonradiative decay in TMCs might thus be to modify the ligands such that puckering is suppressed

The situation is notably dierent at the MXP geometry Here the T1 wave function acquires a 20 contributionof MC excitations as well as 17 of LMCT excitations Furthermore the MLCT and ILLLCT excitations become lesslocalized on the L2 ligand as can be seen by the reappearance of contributions like IrrarrL1 and IrrarrL3 Qualitativelythis excitation could be regarded as an MC excitation with signicant mixing of the d orbitals with ligand orbitals

42 Inuence of spin-orbit coupling state character mixing in [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]

Relativistic eects play an important role in the photophysics of Ir(III) complexes [15 16 118 137 140 149]because only through these eects can the lowest-energy triplet states acquire any radiative decay rate It was shownthat the mixing of close-lying low-energy MLCT and IL states is critical for the radiative decay properties [15 16 118]because the MLCT states lead to enhanced SOCs and the IL states provide a large transition dipole moment Hencethe degree of state character mixing is very relevant for this kind of TMCs and besides the mixed state characterobserved without SOC additional mixing is expected when spin-orbit eects are taken into account The analysis ofthe spin-orbit excited-state character becomes particularly challenging due to this additional mixing as illustrated bythe TD-DFT results reported for [Ir(ppy)3] and [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Ref [140] Here we report a detailed analysis ofthe SOC eects on the excited state character of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] The case of this molecule is particularly instructivebecause this complex is characterized by a high density of low-lying singlet and triplet states of mixed XLCTMLCTcharacter [140] and it is interesting to follow the evolution of the XLCTMLCT (XLCT = halogen-to-ligand chargetransfer) ratio as well as the MLCTIL mixing when applying SOC eects

In Figure 13 we present the state characters for the rst 60 singlet and 60 triplet states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2]on the left and the characters of the resulting 240 spin-mixed states on the right Due to the properties of thespin-freendashspin-mixed transformation (Equation (21)) the total contribution of each state character to all states (ie

22

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

S11

S4

S1

T50

T18

T15

T10

T6

T2T1

(a) spin-free

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

Stat

e

(b) spin-mixed

0 20 40 60 80Character ()

IrrarrIr ClrarrIr ppy2rarrIr ppy2 ILIrrarrCO ClrarrCO ppy2rarrCO ppy2 LLCTIrrarrppy2 Clrarrppy2

Figure 13 Characters of the states of [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] without (a) and with (b) SOC included In (a) all triplet components are present (note thetriply identical entries) so that both gures have the same number of states States are ordered according to energy but for reasons of clarity thebars are equally spaced hence the energies cannot be read from the plot For a discussion of the labeled states see the text (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZ(P)COSMO(water))

23

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

the total area lled by each color) is the same in both panels However the inclusion of SOC leads to a redistributionof the contributions among the electronic states

The characters of the lowest statesmdashfrom S1 to S4 and fromT1 toT6 which are all below 35 eV (above 354 nm)mdasharenot drastically aected when SOC is included The well-separated T1 and T2 are relatively pure IL states althoughthe minor MLCT and XLCT contributions are slightly enhanced when activating SOC eect The subsequent states(S1 to S4 and T3 to T6) are predominantly mixed MLCTXLCT states with some signicant IL contributions whereMLCT character tends to be more predominant for lower states When SOC is taken into account the state charactersbecome slightly mixed but the general picture is unaected

At higher energiesmdashtill states T18 and S11 at about 40 eV (311 nm)mdashSOC perturbation of the spectrum is moreimportant For instance there are two triplets (T10 andT15) with dominant MCXMCT (halogen-to-metal CT) characterUpon SOC mixing the lower one of these two triplets changes order with several IL states and the upper one showsvery strong zero eld splitting such that the three components become interspersed by other states Furthermore forT18 signicant de-mixing can be seen as this state has notable MLCT and XLCT contributions (30 in total) butafter including SOC becomes a very pure LLCT (gt88) state Among the remaining states a clear redistribution ofthe XLCT and IL contributions and a decrease of the LLCT character can be discerned

Above S11 the analysis of the characters shows the occurrence of ppy2 rarrCO and ppy2 rarrIr contributions aswell as excitations towards carbonyl orbitals (IrrarrCO ClrarrCO) Additionally a large number of the states showsmajor LLCT and IL contributions whereas XLCT contributions are relatively rare in this range of states and onlyreappear around T50 The eect of SOC at the top range of the calculated states (ie above T50) is mostly to make allstates more similarmdashas can be seen these states are all a mixture of MLCT XLCT LLCT and IL

It goes without saying that the presented results and discussion are valid only at the Franck-Condon geometryused for the presented excited-state calculation and for the B3LYP functional employed within the limitations ofTD-DFT Multi-reference electronic structure methodsmdashwhich provide more exibility treat charge transfer characterdierently and go beyond single excitationsmdashcould exhibit a dierent picture Some aspects of the inuence of theelectronic structure method on the excited-state character will be discussed in Section 45

Also worth noting is that a correlation analysis (analogous to the one in Figure 10) for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] showsthat the metal atom and the carbonyl group are relatively independent units (r asymp 05) Actually the complex showsalmost no charge transfer contributions originating at the carbonyl group Furthermore contributions like ClrarrCO orppy2 rarrCO only appear in certain regions of the spectrum These ndings are in contrast to the strong metal-carbonylcorrelation of the Re(CO)3 unit discussed above for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

43 Inuence of the ligands charge transfer analysis of [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap)

A very interesting class of TMCs is based on the complex [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ (bipy = 22rsquo-bipyridine dppz =dipyrido-[32-a2rsquo3rsquo-c]-phenazine) which has been reported as a molecular light switch for DNA in 1990 [150] Sincethen a huge research activity has developed in this eld both experimentally [151ndash160] and theoretically [59 160ndash167]The main goal of these studies was to understand the impact of the ligand sphere on the photophysics of [Ru(L)2(dppz-like)]2+ molecules and to assess the character of the low-lying excited states responsible for the luminescenceproperties [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ does not luminesce in water however it is slightly luminescent in acetonitrileand highly luminescent in the presence of DNA Similarly [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ (phen = 110-phenanthroline) ischaracterized by a rapid nearly nonradiative decay (time constant of 250 ps) in water [151] and by a moderateluminescence in acetonitrile that increases drastically in DNA [151 153 168 169] In contrast to the bipy- andphen-substituted complexes [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ (tap=1458-tetraazaphenanthrene) [170 171] is luminescent in waterand in organic solvents but interestingly has its luminescence quenched in DNA by electron transfer

It has been shown both experimentally [156 172] and theoretically [59 167] that the relative energies of thelow-lying triplet states of dierent naturemdashILdppz MLCTanc (anc ancillary ligands) MLCTprox and MLCTdis (localizedon the dppz ligand see Figure 14a)mdashgovern the luminescence properties of this class of complexes This eect can betraced to the dierent sensitivity of the dierent states to the environment and to substituents eects

24

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

(a) CT states in [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+

Ru

ancillar

y 1

ancillary 2

prox

imal

dist

al

Rurarr(L)2

Rurarrproxdistrarrprox

Rurarrdist

(b) Correlation between dppzprox and dppzdist

N N

NN

A

B

C

DEF

r = 074

r = 077

r = 070

r = 057r = 059r = 067

Figure 14 In (a) a general scheme of [Re(L)2(dppz)]2+ and its most relevant charge transfer states In (b) dierent fragmentation schemes for thedppz ligand where the red lines depict where proximal (top part of molecule) and distal (bottom) parts are separated The labels next to the linesgive the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal parts (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

In order to quantify the dierent types of transitions underlying the photophysics of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+[Ru(phen)2 (dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ we have performed a charge transfer analysis of the 50 lowest singletand triplet states of each molecule Figure 15 shows the excitation energies oscillator strengths and charge transfercharacter for the three complexes where they have been divided into three fragments (i) Ru (ii) L2 and (iii) dppz assuggested by automatic fragmentation and consistency with previous theoretical studies [59 167]

For all three complexes it can be seen that the low-energy states are dominated by MLCT states involving eitherthe ancillary ligands L2 (orange) or the dppz ligand (yellow) Which ligands are involved in the lowest singlet (S1) andlowest triplet (T1) states depends on the kind of ancillary ligands present as bipy phen and tap dier considerably intheir electron acceptor strength Hence for L=bipy or phen the S1 and T1 are MLCT states towards the dppz ligandwhereas for L=tap these states involve the ancillary ligands More generally for L=bipy the MLCT states involvingbipy tend to be higher in energy than the MLCT states involving dppz For L=phen both types of MLCT states areat similar energies (nicely visible on the left of panel (b)) whereas for L=tap the MLCT states involving dppz areshifted upwards relative to the MLCT states involving tap

The lowest non-MLCT singlet is only located at around 34 eV making it the S15 to S20 depending on L ForL=bipyphen this lowest non-MLCT state has ILdppz character whereas for L=tap it has dppzrarrL2 character For thetriplet states the situation is dierent as the lowest non-MLCT state has an energy of only 26 eV which is onlyslightly higher than the lowest triplet state (at 25 eV) For all three molecules this low-lying non-MLCT state is of

25

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(a) [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(b) [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

dppzrarrdppzdppzrarrL2dppzrarrRuL2rarrdppzL2rarrL2L2rarrRuRurarrdppzRurarrL2RurarrRu

(c) [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 15 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy phen tap) each with 50 singlets and50 triplets For each molecule the top portion of the respective panel shows the energies (horizontal bars energy range equivalent to 275ndash500 nm)oscillator strength (gray shading behind bars) and state character (color of the bars) The bottom part of each panel shows the contributions toeach state as computed with TheoDORE (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

ILdppz character The low energy of this triplet is due to the fact that such ππ lowast transitions typically have a very largesinglet-triplet splitting due to large exchange interactions

At higher energies a large number of IL and LLCT states appear in all three molecules However there areimportant dierences which can be conveniently extracted from the gure For example states of L2rarrL2 character(medium green) are very rare for L=bipy and gain importance when going to L=phen or L=tap For L=tap there isactually a set of 8 nearly degenerate L2rarrL2 (6 IL and 2 LLCT states) states at 40ndash41 eV Similarly for L=bipyphenthere are some L2rarrdppz states (light green) whereas L=tap does not exhibit such states only a large number ofdppzrarrL2 states Of course this dierent behavior of the L=tap complex is related to the well-established strong π lowastacceptor character of tap as compared to bipy or phen

26

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

S1 S10 S20 S30 S40 S50 T1 T10 T20 T30 T40 T500

20406080

State

Cha

ract

er(

)

distrarrdistdistrarrproxproxrarrdistproxrarrproxRurarrdistRurarrproxRurarrL2

2530354045

E(e

V)

Figure 16 Compact depiction of the results of vertical excitation calculations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ (L=bipy) each with 50 singlets and 50 tripletsIn this plot we only show the MLCT contributionsmdashdistinguishing between the proximal and distal parts of dppzmdashand the dierent ILdppzcontributions In Figure 14a the dierent charge transfer types are depicted in a similar color code (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

One very important aspect of the MLCT and IL states of the [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ complexes is their localization onthe dppz ligand In particular it was found that these complexes exhibit states which mostly involve the part ofdppz close to the metal atom (called ldquoproximalrdquo subunit [156]) and states which involve the other part (ldquodistalrdquo [156])Using the charge transfer numbers one can also investigate with more detail the relationship between these twosubunits of dppz We rst employed the correlation analysis to quantify how much the two subunits are actuallydecoupled In order to do so in Figure 14b we show the correlation coecients between the proximal and distal partsof dppz depending on where the two units are divided A low correlation coecient indicates that the two unitsare more independent ie that they participate in dierent electronic states In that sense the optimal division ofdppz results in a bipyridine unit (proximal) and a phenazine unit (distal) which is consistent with chemical intuitionThis nding is the same irrespective of L (bipy phen or tap) and solvent (acetonitrile or water) and the same resultwas also obtained for a completely dierent dppz-containing complex namely [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ (py=pyridine)Furthermore ab initio fragmentation analyzes (ie starting from atomic fragments) of the dppz in the Ru and Recomplexes also suggest a division in bipyridine and phenazine units

With the optimal division of dppz established it is possible to analyze the excited-state characters of the complexesshown in Figure 16 for the lowest 50 singlet and 50 triplet states of [Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ Most importantly the gureshows how the MLCTdppz contributions are split into Rurarrprox (yellow) and Rurarrdist (black) contributions andhow the ILdppz contribution is composed It can be seen that for MLCT states the proximal part of dppz is the betterelectron acceptor For ILdppz states it is found that the lower-energy states are mostly local distrarrdist excitationswhereas the higher states involve distrarrprox contributions

The presented data can also be used to generally quantify the electron donor and acceptor properties of theproximal and distal parts by calculating the average contribution of eg the sum over all proxrarrany excitationsIt is found that the proximal unit participates more as acceptor with an average contribution of 28 to all statescompared to 17 for the distal unit On the contrary the distal part is a better donor (18) than the proximal part(12) Using either the detailed analysis of the states or these donoracceptor descriptors it should be possibleto design substituted dppz ligands where the proximaldistal contributions can be controlled to tailor the chargetransfer character of the low-lying excited states for dierent applications as mentioned above

44 Inuence of the metal center metal-carbonyl interaction in [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re)

Metal carbonyl diimine complexes [M(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ (NN=diimine L=axial ligand) of group 7 (M=Mn Tc Re)have received increased attention due to their electronic exibility and the possibility to be incorporated in dierentenvironmentsmdashlike polymers proteins or DNA They are employed in solar cells photocatalysis luminescentmaterials conformational probes radiopharmacy or diagnostic and therapeutic tools at the interfaces betweenchemistry physics and biology [30 173 174]

27

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (a) M=Mn (hole)

r = 098a = 028

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

Y=Phen Y=Im Y=(CO)3 Y=M

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (b) M=Mn (el)

r = 034a = 118

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (c) M=Tc (hole)

r = 099a = 038

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (d) M=Tc (el)

r = 073a = 194

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (e) M=Re (hole)

r = 099a = 047

ΩMrarrY ()

Ω(C

O) 3rarr

Y(

)

0 20 40 60 80 1000

20

40

60

80

100 (f) M=Re (el)

r = 079a = 280

ΩYrarrM ()

ΩYrarr

(CO) 3

()

Figure 17 Charge transfer numbers for the rst 50 singlets and 50 triplets of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) based on 20 geometriessampled from the ground state nuclear vibrational density distribution In the left column (panels (a) (c) (e)) the correlation between thecharge transfer numbers ΩMrarrY and Ω(CO)3rarrY is shown thus presenting a correlation analysis for the hole In the right panels ((b) (d) (f))the correlations are shown for the electron The r and a values in the panels are the Pearson correlation coecient and slope from a t withf (x ) = ax (TDA-B3LYPTZP-DZP COSMO(water))

For rhenium derivatives [Re(CO)3(L)(NN)]n+ recent ultrafast spectroscopic experiments [175ndash178] and theoreticalinvestigations [57 58 60 179ndash181] have provided a comprehensive picture of their optical and photophysicalproperties The imidazole (im) derivative [Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ is employed in the study of electron transfer inproteins [18 173 182 183] In this particular complex it has been often noted that the optical orbitals are delocalizedover the metal and the carbonyls thus giving rise to mixed MLCTLLCT states [29 57] As this situation is verysimilar to that encountered in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in section 33 this molecule seems very suitable to challenge wavefunction analysis In particular we would like to investigate whether this is an eect specic to the rhenium orwhether it can be encountered in other metals of the same group Accordingly we shall investigate the correlationbetween the metal center and the carbonyl ligands in the series [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ (M=Mn Tc Re) To this aim wedivided the molecule into four fragments M (CO)3 im and phen and in each case we computed the rst 50 singletand 50 triplet states for a set of 20 randomly generated geometries (sampled from the ground state nuclear vibrationaldensity distribution see Computational Details) ie forming a set of 2000 excited states for each molecule

The correlation analyses are shown in Figure 17 The left panels show the correlation between the excitations

28

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

out of the orbitals of M or (CO)3 Very strong correlations are observed in all three cases with Pearson correlationcoecients of 098 or above This strong correlation is certainly not accidental as it is found for all 2000 states at 20dierent geometries with energies ranging from below 3 eV up to 6 eV and with widely diering state charactersBasically the correlation tells that independent of the state character the charge transfer contribution of (CO)3 isalways a xed portion of the charge transfer contribution of the metal

The gure correlates four principally independent pairs of charge transfer numbers ΩMrarrM with Ω(CO)3rarrM(orange) ΩMrarr(CO)3 with Ω(CO)3rarr(CO)3 (red) ΩMrarrIm with Ω(CO)3rarrIm (light blue) and ΩMrarrPhen with Ω(CO)3rarrPhen (darkblue) Accordingly we see that not only is MLCT correlated with LLCT but likewise is MC correlated with LMCTMoreover it is interesting to see that the strong correlation is found regardless of the metal atom although the slopesof the correlations are dierent For Mn the shown slope is very shallow (028) which indicates that the chargetransfer states originate mostly from the metal center and the participation of the carbonyls is relatively weak Forthe intermediate metal Tc the slope is already 038 whereas for Re it is 047 Hence with increasing size of themetal center the participation of the carbonyls in the electronic excitations increase In the Re complex in all chargetransfer states two thirds of the excited electron density comes from the metal and one third comes from the threecarbonyls

The situation is dierent if the correlations of excitations into the orbitals of M and (CO)3 are investigated (rightpanels) In this case the correlations are much weaker in particular for M=Mn This nding indicates that the virtualorbitals are more localized on either M or (CO)3 unlike the delocalized occupied orbitals and that for M=Re thevirtual orbitals are mostly localized on (CO)3

45 Inuence of the method exchange- and correlation eects in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

As a nal application of the wavefunction analysis we investigate here the inuence of the exchange- andcorrelation functionals on the energies and state characters of the example [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] More than often it isnecessary to assess the quality of the results of some excited-state calculation against another excited-state calculationusing a dierentmdashpossibly more reliablemdashelectronic structure method A simple comparison of the excitation energiesis in most cases not sucient because the order of the states (in terms of state character) might change [184] Hencewave function analysis techniques can be very useful especially in TMCs with their very high density of states

Excited-state calculations for [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] have been performed with TD-DFT using the functionalsPBE [185] B3LYP [186] PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190]) The results of thesefunctionals will be compared to the ones from the ab initio ADC(3) [191ndash193] and CASPT2(1212) [48 49] methodsDetails on these calculations can be found in the Computational Details section Figure 18 compactly shows theresulting energies of the excited states on the vertical axis with colored horizontal bars indicating the state characterThe dierent TD-DFT results are correlated (gray lines) using overlap calculations [74 194]

Generally speaking there are three classes of excited states visible in the plot mixed MLCTXLCT states (indicatedin shades of blue) MC states (orange might contain admixtures of XMCT states in red) and IL states (green) Herewe consider Re and (CO)3 as one fragment because they are correlated (see Section 33) The lowest excited stateswith all methods are several MLCTXLCT states even though the energy of this class of states depends heavilyon the employed method and generally increases when more Hartree-Fock exchange is considered in the TD-DFTcalculations (from left to right) Moreover the ratio between MLCT and XLCT depends signicantly on the methodwhere more Hartree-Fock exchange tends to decrease the XLCT contribution for the two ab initio methods theXLCT contribution is also relatively small The MC states only appear at higher energiesmdasharound 4 eVmdashbut theirenergies are far less sensitive to the method Only few IL states were computed although among the triplets thisclass of states is more common due to the strong triplet stabilization of the IL states

For this particular complex it can also be followed from Figure 18 that for TD-DFT calculations a relatively largeamount of Hartree-Fock exchange is necessary in order to obtain results consistent with the correlated ab initiomethods Compared to the ADC(3) results the TD-DFT computations using CAMY-B3LYP and M06-2X providedthe best results On the contrary the CASPT2 results are qualitatively reproduced by ωB97 although the CASPT2calculations did not provide any MC states due to active space restrictions

29

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Energy (eV)

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

Method(a) PBE(b) B3LYP(c) PBE0(d) CAMY-B3LYP(e) M06-2X(f) ωB97(g) ADC(3)(h) CASPT2(1212)

Overlaps1007550255

CharacterRe(CO)3 rarr Re(CO)3Cl rarr Re(CO)3Re(CO)3 rarr bipyCl rarr bipybipy rarr bipyRemainder (1-el)Remainder (ge 2-el)

Singlets

Triplet

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g)

Figure 18 Comparison of energies (y axis) and state character (color code of bars) of the low-lying states of [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] for dierentelectronic structure methods The diagonal black lines correlate states of the same charactermdashobtained through overlap calculationsmdashwhere thethickness of the line is proportional to the overlap The dotted lines serve the same purpose but were added manually based on an inspection ofthe state characters because overlaps of the TD-DFT results with ADC(3) or CASPT2 cannot be calculated currently (TDA-DFTTZP-DZ(P)ADC(3)def2-TZVP CASPT2ANO-RCC all gas phase see appendix A for full computational details)

Without attempting to discuss which result is better (that goes beyond the intention and scope of this review) theprevious example shows the easiness in comparing results obtained from dierent methods when using quantitativewave function analysis

5 Concluding remarks

We have reviewed a quantitative wave function analysis technique based on the concept of charge transfernumbers Charge transfer numbers are a mathematical tool based on the transition density matrix for the analysisof excited states in terms of electronic transitions between groups of atoms This toolmdashwhich is implemented inthe TheoDORE software package and interfaced to several quantum chemistry programsmdashallows quantifying thelocalization and charge transfer character in an automatized way without looking at any orbital Charge transfernumbers provide signicant advantages compared to traditional state characterization based on orbital visualizationThese advantages include ecient analysis of large numbers of states reproducibility objectivity and quanticationwhich allows spotting chemical trends In the case of transition metal photochemistry where a high density of states

30

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

and the many dierent state characters are encountered such a quantitative excited-state analysis is particularlyhelpful

In this contribution we also report the extension of charge transfer numbers to the case of spin-orbit-coupledstates and introduce a novel clustering approach which allows automatically partitioning the molecule into sensiblechromophoric units This machinery was subsequently applied to various prototypical transition metal complexesin a number of case studies devoted to Ir(III) phosphorescent emitters Ru(II) dipyrido-phenazine photo-switchesand Re(I) α-diimine carbonyl complexes The case studies demonstrated the potential of the charge transfer numberconcept for investigating dierent aspects of transition metal quantum chemistry (i) the eect of modication ofthe nuclear geometry along a reaction coordinate (ii) the eect of spin-orbit-induced mixing (iii) the eect of theligand sphere (iv) the eect of the metal center and (v) the eect of the electronic structure method The presentedcase studies are primarily intended as exploratory and tutorial-like as the results depend on the chosen underlyingelectronic structure method and on the considered nuclear geometry Nevertheless the case studies show beautifullythe complexity of the photophysics and photochemistry of the investigated transition metal complexes

More elaborate applications of the presented analysis tools can be envisaged In a very general sense automaticwave function analysis can aid in the design of metal complexes for specic photonic applications for example byserving as an optimization target Regarding excited-state dynamics simulations automatic analysis can tremendouslyhelp in tracking the electronic states of interest along the nuclear trajectory Moreover it might even be possibleto employ the charge transfer numbers in automatized diabatization schemes by transforming the states suchthat the descriptors change as little as possible Applications are also imaginable in theoretical chemistry methoddevelopment Charge transfer numbers could be used to aid in the design of sensible active spaces for multi-congurational calculations based on results from less costly TD-DFT computations They also might help tounderstand the failure of some electronic structure methods at describing charge transfer states Finally chargetransfer numbers could be employed to parametrize point charges for excited-state force elds for molecular dynamicsor hybrid quantum mechanicsmolecular mechanics calculations Hence we expect that the presented analysistechniques will be very useful for future theoretical investigations of transition metal complexes

Acknowledgments

SM FP and LG gratefully acknowledge funding from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) within project I2883and the University of Vienna The Vienna Scientic Cluster (VSC3) is acknowledged for computational time MFand CD acknowledge funding from the Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) within project ANR-15-CE29-0027and the FRC and Labex CSC (ANR-10-LABX-0026_CSC) The authors also want to thank A Vlček and S Zaacuteliš forfruitful discussions and the inspiring COST action CM1305 (ECOSTBio)

Appendix A Computational details

Electronic structure packages

The quantum chemical calculations were performed with ADF 2017 [83] for DFT and TD-DFT with QChem50 [84] for ADC(3) [193] and with a development version of MOLCAS 81 [85] for CASSCFCASPT2 [48 49] Thecharge transfer number analyzes were done using a development version of TheoDORE 15 [82] For ADF a newlydeveloped interface between TheoDORE and ADF was used (see below) Integrated analysis utilities in Q-Chem [71]and Molcas [86] were used to preprocess the output from these programs

Interface between TheoDORE and ADF

For the purpose of this work a new interface between the TheoDORE program package and ADF was implementedThis interface proceeds by reading all required information (geometries response vectors MO-coecients locations

31

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

of the basis functions) from the binary ldquoTAPE21rdquo les produced by ADF In the case of full TD-DFT computations(rather than TDA) generally the right eigenvectors ie X + Y (Equation (1)) are analyzed For the purpose ofanalyzing spin-orbit coupled charge transfer numbers the spin-orbit Hamiltonian was extracted from the TAPE21 leand subsequently diagonalized to yield the coecients UIα which were inserted into Equation (25) The describedTheoDOREndashADF interface will be made available within the next TheoDORE release along with utility scripts thathelp in generating the plots shown in this work

Hierarchical clustering

The agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm [121 122] is employed to automatically analyze the correla-tions between the fragments which are quantied with Equations (26) (27) and (28) The clustering algorithm takesthe distance matrix R as main input In each iteration of the algorithm the smallest value RAB (A B) in the distancematrix is looked up and the two clusters A and B are subsequently merged To do this the columns and rows A andB are deleted from the distance matrix and instead a new columnC is added holding the eective distances from thejust-formed cluster C = A cup B to all other clusters in the matrix The eective distances are computed as a functionof the original distances so in order to compute the distance RCD one computes RCD = f (Rxy x isin Cy isin D)Here dierent choices for f are possible for example using the minimum of the distances (the algorithm is thencalled single-linkage clustering) the maximum of the distances (complete-linkage clustering) or the average of thedistances (average-linkage clustering) Among these choices complete-linkage clustering is generally reported to bevery sensitive to outliers whereas single-linkage clustering has a tendency to yield chain-like clusters Hence weemploy average-linkage clustering for our purposes

Level of theory

The single point calculation for the analysis presented in Sections 2 31 and 32 for [Ir(ppy)3] was performedusing the geometry reported in Ref [81] which has C3 symmetry For the TD-DFT calculation the following basissets were used TZP for Ir DZP for C and N and DZ for H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZ(P)rdquo in the main text) We used theB3LYP functional and COSMO (for water with non-equilibrium solvation with εinfin = 177) to compute 30 excitedsinglet states and 30 triplet states although in Sections 2 and 31 only the lowest six triplets are discussed

The calculation for the correlation analysis of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] in Section 33 was carried outwith the geometry reported in [180] which is of Cs symmetry TZP for Re DZP for C N and Cl and DZ for H wereused together with the B3LYP functional The computation was done in the gas phase and 20 singlets plus 20 tripletswere computed

The potential energy scan of [Ir(ppy)3] in Section 41 was carried out using the geometry reported in Ref [81]as the S0 minimum The T1 minimum was optimized with UKS whereas the T1S0 minimum energy path (MXP)was optimized with TD-DFT both optimizations started from the S0 geometry The crossing points were locatedwith the algorithm described in Ref [195] employing the gradients provided by ADF and the ORCA [196] optimizeras ADF does not allow optimizing crossing points The non-minimum crossing point (XP) in Figure 12 was takenfrom the optimization iterations such that the T1 minus S0 gap was lt002 eV the octahedral coordination was retainedand the energy was as low as possible Subsequently a linear interpolation in internal coordinates was carried outbetween S0 minimum T1 minimum the XP and the MXP Both optimizations and the single point calculations forthe interpolated geometries were done in the gas phase with TZP for Re DZP for CN DZ for H and the B3LYPfunctional

The single point calculation for [Ir(Cl)(CO)(ppy)2] in Section 42 employed the geometry reported by Brahim et al[140] using the geometry data denoted as ldquocis-[Ir(ppy)2(CO)(Cl)] 2ardquo in the supporting information (note that in themain text of [140] structure 2a is erroneously labeled as the trans conformer) The calculation was performed withB3LYP TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cl and DZ for H in the gas phase and requesting 60 singlets and 60 triplets

The three computations for [Ru(L)2(dppz)]2+ L=bipy phen or tap in Section 43 are based on geometriesoptimized in C2 symmetry with B3LYPTZP and COSMO (water) the one for [Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ on a geometry in

32

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

Cs symmetry For the vertical excitation calculations we employed the B3LYP functional TZP for Ru and DZP for CN and H (denoted as ldquoTZP-DZPrdquo in the main text) again using COSMO (water εinfin = 177) 50 singlets and 50 tripletswere computed for each of the complexes

The ground state geometries of [M(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ M = Mn Tc or Re in Section 44 were optimized withB3LYPTZP with COSMO (water) Out of the possible conformers of these molecules only one conformermdashwherethe imidazole plane is oriented parallel to the NphenndashNphen connection line [179]mdashwas considered as this is the moststable conformer (by 1ndash4 kJmol) For each optimized geometry we performed a frequency calculation to obtain thevibrational frequencies and normal modes which together fully specify the harmonic ground state potential energysurface around the minimum From that we computed the density distribution of the nuclear vibrational groundstate wave function [197 198] from which for each complex 20 geometries were randomly sampled For each ofthese 60 geometries we then computed 50 singlet and 50 triplet states using B3LYP TZP for Re and DZP for C N Oand H

Finally the computations in Section 45 contrasting quantum chemical methods in [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)] alsoemployed the Cs symmetric geometry of Ref [180] For the TD-DFT calculations TZP for Re DZP for C N O Cland DZ for H were used Excited states were computed with the following functionals PBE [185] B3LYP [186]PBE0 [187] CAMY-B3LYP [188] M06-2X [189] and ωB97 [190] using 30 singlets and 30 triplets The ADC(3)computations used Ahlrichsrsquo def2-TZVP basis set with the corresponding ECP for Re and def2-SV(P) for theremaining atoms [199 200] In this case 40 states were computed in total each 10 for 1Aprime 1Aprimeprime 3Aprime and 3Aprimeprime TheCASSCFCASPT2 computations [48 49] used the ANO-RCC basis set [201] with a [24s21p15d11f4g|8s7p5d2f1g]contraction scheme for Re [17s12p5d|4s3p1d] for Cl [14s9p4d|3s2p1d] for C N O and [8s|2s] for H In the CAS(1212)calculation the active space contains 2timespCl 1timesπbipy 3timesdRe 3timesπ lowastbipyabd3timesπ lowastCO orbitals The CASPT2 uses the defaultIPEA shift [202] of 025 au an imaginary level shift of 02 au and 54 frozen occupied orbitals State-averaging in theCASSCF computations was performed over 19 singlet states and state-specic CASPT2 corrections were computedfor each state

All the geometries employed in this contribution both taken from the literature or optimized within the presentwork are reported in the supporting information This also contains the active space orbitals of the CASPT2calculation on [Re(Cl)(CO)3(bipy)]

References

[1] C Garino L Salassa The photochemistry of transition metal complexes using density functional theory Phil Trans R Soc A 371 (1995)(2013) 20120134 doi101098rsta20120134

[2] M Graumltzel Dye-sensitized solar cells J Photoch Photobio C 4 (2) (2003) 145 ndash 153 doi101016S1389-5567(03)00026-1[3] A S Polo M K Itokazu N Y M Iha Metal complex sensitizers in dye-sensitized solar cells Coord Chem Rev 248 (13) (2004) 1343 ndash 1361

doi101016jccr200404013[4] S Fantacci F D Angelis A computational approach to the electronic and optical properties of Ru(II) and Ir(III) polypyridyl complexes

Applications to DSC OLED and NLO Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2704 ndash 2726 doi101016jccr201103008[5] M Jaumlger L Freitag L Gonzaacutelez Using computational chemistry to design ru photosensitizers with directional charge transfer Coord

Chem Rev 304-305 (Supplement C) (2015) 146 ndash 165 doihttpsdoiorg101016jccr201503019[6] D Gust T A Moore A L Moore Solar fuels via articial photosynthesis Acc Chem Res 42 (12) (2009) 1890ndash1898 doi101021ar900209b[7] T S Teets D G Nocera Photocatalytic hydrogen production Chem Commun 47 (2011) 9268ndash9274 doi101039C1CC12390D[8] H Hennig M Beller C Bolm Transition Metals in Photocatalysis Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH 2008 pp 412ndash419 doi101002

9783527619399ch6c[9] T Bitterwolf Photochemistry of Transition Metal Complexes John Wiley amp Sons Ltd 2011 doi1010029781119951438eibc0174

URL httpdxdoiorg1010029781119951438eibc0174[10] J Twilton C C Le P Zhang M H Shaw R W Evans D W C MacMillan The merger of transition metal and photocatalysis Nat Rev

Chem 1 (2017) 0052 doi101038s41570-017-0052[11] N J Farrer L Salassa P J Sadler Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) the potential of excited-state d-block metals in medicine Dalton

Trans (2009) 10690ndash10701doi101039B917753A[12] D E J G J Dolmans D Fukumura R K Jain Photodynamic therapy for cancer Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 380 doi101038nrc1071[13] A Ruggi F W van Leeuwen A H Velders Interaction of dioxygen with the electronic excited state of ir(III) and ru(II) complexes Principles

and biomedical applications Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2542 ndash 2554 doi101016jccr201105012[14] W C H Choy W K Chan Y Yuan Recent advances in transition metal complexes and light-management engineering in organic

optoelectronic devices Adv Mater 26 (31) (2014) 5368ndash5399 doi101002adma201306133

33

[15] H Yersin A F Rausch R Czerwieniec T Hofbeck T Fischer The triplet state of organo-transition metal compounds triplet harvestingand singlet harvesting for ecient OLEDs Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2622 ndash 2652 doi101016jccr201101042

[16] B Powell Theories of phosphorescence in organo-transition metal complexes ndash from relativistic eects to simple models and designprinciples for organic light-emitting diodes Coord Chem Rev 295 (Supplement C) (2015) 46 ndash 79 doi101016jccr201502008

[17] J R Lakowicz (Ed) Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy Springer US 2006 doi101007978-0-387-46312-4[18] H B Gray J R Winkler Electron tunneling through proteins Q Rev Biophys 36 (3) (2003) 341ndash372 doi101017S0033583503003913[19] A Vlček H Kvapilovaacute M Towrie S Zaacuteliš Electron-transfer acceleration investigated by time resolved infrared spectroscopy Acc Chem

Res 48 (3) (2015) 868ndash876 doi101021ar5004048[20] V Fernandez-Moreira F L Thorp-Greenwood M P Coogan Application of d6 transition metal complexes in uorescence cell imaging

Chem Commun 46 (2010) 186ndash202 doi101039B917757D[21] J Zhang B W-K Chu N Zhu V W-W Yam Synthesis characterization langmuir-blodgett lm-forming property and second-order

nonlinear optical study of rhenium(I) and ruthenium(II) diimine complexes Organometallics 26 (22) (2007) 5423ndash5429 doi101021om070030b

[22] P Coppens I Novozhilova A Kovalevsky Photoinduced linkage isomers of transition-metal nitrosyl compounds and related complexesChem Rev 102 (4) (2002) 861ndash884 doi101021cr000031c

[23] A S Polo M K Itokazu K M Frin A O de Toledo Patrociacutenio N Y M Iha Light driven trans-to-cis isomerization of stilbene-likeligands in fac-[Re(CO)3(NN)(trans-L)]+ and luminescence of their photoproducts Coord Chem Rev 250 (13) (2006) 1669 ndash 1680 doi101016jccr200512015

[24] M Turki C Daniel S Zaacuteliš A Vlček J van Slageren D J Stufkens UV-visible absorption spectra of [Ru(E)(Ersquo)(CO)2(iPr-DAB)] (E = Ersquo =SnPh3 or Cl E = SnPh3 or Cl Ersquo = CH3 iPr-DAB = NNrsquo-Di-isopropyl-14-diaza-13-butadiene) Combination of CASSCFCASPT2 andTD-DFT calculations J Am Chem Soc 123 (46) (2001) 11431ndash11440 pMID 11707120 doi101021ja010782b

[25] C Daniel Electronic spectroscopy and photoreactivity in transition metal complexes Coord Chem Rev 238-239 (Supplement C) (2003) 143ndash 166 doi101016S0010-8545(02)00295-3

[26] C Daniel Photochemistry and photophysics of transition metal complexes Quantum chemistry Coord Chem Rev 282ndash283 (2015) 19 ndash 32doi101016jccr201405023

[27] C Daniel Absorption Spectroscopy Emissive Properties and Ultrafast Intersystem Crossing Processes in Transition Metal ComplexesTD-DFT and Spin-Orbit Coupling Springer International Publishing Cham 2016 pp 377ndash413 doi101007128_2015_635

[28] C Daniel C Gourlaouen Chemical bonding alteration upon electronic excitation in transition metal complexes Coord Chem Rev344 (Supplement C) (2017) 131 ndash 149 doi101016jccr201610010

[29] A Vlček Ultrafast excited-state processes in Re(I) carbonyl-diimine complexes From excitation to photochemistry in Topics in Organometal-lic Chemistry Vol 29 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2009

[30] A Kumar S-S Sun A J Lees Photophysics and Photochemistry of Organometallic Rhenium Diimine Complexes Vol 29 Springer BerlinHeidelberg Berlin Heidelberg 2010 pp 37ndash71 doi1010073418_2009_2

[31] P S Wagenknecht P C Ford Metal centered ligand eld excited states Their roles in the design and performance of transition metalbased photochemical molecular devices Coord Chem Rev 255 (5) (2011) 591 ndash 616 doi101016jccr201011016

[32] G Baryshnikov B Minaev H Aringgren Theory and calculation of the phosphorescence phenomenon Chem Rev 117 (9) (2017) 6500ndash6537doi101021acschemrev7b00060

[33] K Sone Y Fukuda Solvatochromism of transition metal complexes with organic ligands in donor and acceptor solvents Rev Inorg Chem11 (1990) 123ndash153 doi101515REVIC1990112-4123

[34] A J Lees The luminescence rigidochromic eect exhibited by organometallic complexes Rationale and applications Comments InorgChem 17 (6) (1995) 319ndash346 doi10108002603599508032711

[35] J M Butler M W George J R Schoonover D M Dattelbaum T J Meyer Application of transient infrared and near infrared spectroscopyto transition metal complex excited states and intermediates Coord Chem Rev 251 (3) (2007) 492 ndash 514 doi101016jccr200612002

[36] J S Grith L E Orgel Ligand-eld theory Q Rev Chem Soc 11 (1957) 381ndash393 doi101039QR9571100381[37] C Ballhausen Introduction to Ligand Field Theory McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc 1962[38] B N Figgis M A Hitchman Ligand Field Theory and Its Applications John Wiley amp Sons Inc 2000[39] S J A van Gisbergen J A Groeneveld A Rosa J G Snijders E J Baerends Excitation energies for transition metal compounds from

time-dependent density functional theory applications to MnOminus4 Ni(CO)4 and Mn2(CO)10 J Phys Chem A 103 (34) (1999) 6835ndash6844doi101021jp991060y

[40] A Dreuw M Head-Gordon Single-reference ab initio methods for the calculation of excited states of large molecules Chem Rev 105 (11)(2005) 4009ndash4037 doi101021cr0505627

[41] F Neese T Petrenko D Ganyushin G Olbrich Advanced aspects of ab initio theoretical optical spectroscopy of transition metal complexesMultiplets spin-orbit coupling and resonance raman intensities Coord Chem Rev 251 (3ndash4) (2007) 288ndash327 doi101016jccr200605019

[42] A Vlček S Zaacuteliš Modeling of charge-transfer transitions and excited states in d6 transition metal complexes by DFT techniques CoordChem Rev 251 (3) (2007) 258 ndash 287 doi101016jccr200605021

[43] C J Cramer D G Truhlar Density functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry Phys Chem Chem Phys 11(2009) 10757ndash10816 doi101039B907148B

[44] S Vancoillie H Zhao V Tran M Hendrickx K Pierloot Multicongurational second-order perturbation theory restricted activespace (RASPT2) studies on mononuclear rst-row transition-metal systems J Chem Theory Comput 7 (12) (2011) 3961ndash3977 doi101021ct200597h

[45] F Labat T Le Bahers I Cioni C Adamo First-principles modeling of dye-sensitized solar cells Challenges and perspectives Acc ChemRes 45 (8) (2012) 1268ndash1277 doi101021ar200327w

[46] L Gonzaacutelez D Escudero L Serrano-Andreacutes Progress and challenges in the calculation of electronic excited states ChemPhysChem 13 (1)(2012) 28ndash51 doi101002cphc201100200

34

[47] N Almeida R McKinlay M Paterson Computation of Excited States of Transition Metal Complexes Vol 167 of Structure and BondingSpringer Cham 2014 pp 107ndash138 doi101007430_2014_151

[48] B O Roos The complete active space self-consistent eld method and its applications in electronic structure calculations Adv Chem Phys69 (1987) 399ndash445 doi1010029780470142943ch7

[49] P Pulay A perspective on the CASPT2 method Int J Quant Chem 111 (13) (2011) 3273ndash3279 doi101002qua23052[50] C Angeli M Pastore R Cimiraglia New perspectives in multireference perturbation theory the n-electron valence state approach Theor

Chem Acc 117 (5) (2007) 743ndash754 doi101007s00214-006-0207-0[51] S Chattopadhyay R K Chaudhuri U S Mahapatra A Ghosh S S Ray State-specic multireference perturbation theory development

and present status WIREs Comput Mol Sci 6 (3) (2016) 266ndash291 doi101002wcms1248[52] P G Szalay T Muumlller G Gidofalvi H Lischka R Shepard Multiconguration self-consistent eld and multireference conguration

interaction methods and applications Chem Rev 112 (1) (2012) 108ndash181 doi101021cr200137a[53] M E Casida Recent Advances in Density Functional Methods Part I World Scientic Singapore 1995[54] M Marques E Gross Time-dependent density functional theory Annu Rev Phys Chem 55 (1) (2004) 427ndash455 doi101146annurev

physchem55091602094449[55] M Casida M Huix-Rotllant Progress in time-dependent density-functional theory Annu Rev Phys Chem 63 (1) (2012) 287ndash323

doi101146annurev-physchem-032511-143803[56] N Ferreacute M Filatov M Huix-Rotllant (Eds) Density-Functional Methods for Excited States Vol 368 of Top Curr Chem Springer 2016[57] R Bakovaacute M Chergui C Daniel A V Jr S Zaacuteliš Relativistic eects in spectroscopy and photophysics of heavy-metal complexes illustrated

by spinndashorbit calculations of [Re(imidazole)(CO)3(phen)]+ Coord Chem Rev 255 (7-8) (2011) 975 ndash 989 doi101016jccr201012027[58] R Heydovaacute E Gindensperger R Romano J Syacutekora A Vlček S Zaacuteliš C Daniel Spinndashorbit treatment of UVndashvis absorption spectra

and photophysics of rhenium(I) carbonylndashbipyridine complexes MS-CASPT2 and TD-DFT analysis J Phys Chem A 116 (46) (2012)11319ndash11329 doi101021jp305461z

[59] T Veacutery D Ambrosek M Otsuka C Gourlaouen X Assfeld A Monari C Daniel Photophysical properties of ruthenium(II) polypyridylDNA intercalators Eects of the molecular surroundings investigated by theory Chem Eur J 20 (40) (2014) 12901ndash12909 doi101002chem201402963

[60] M Fumanal C Daniel Description of excited states in [Re(Imidazole)(CO)3(Phen)]+ including solvent and spin-orbit coupling eects Densityfunctional theory versus multicongurational wavefunction approach J Comput Chem 37 (27) (2016) 2454ndash2466 doi101002jcc24469

[61] T Le Bahers C Adamo I Cioni A qualitative index of spatial extent in charge-transfer excitations J Chem Theory Comput 7 (8) (2011)2498ndash2506 doi101021ct200308m

[62] M Ehara R Fukuda C Adamo I Cioni Chemically intuitive indices for charge-transfer excitation based on SAC-CI and TD-DFTcalculations J Comput Chem 34 (29) (2013) 2498ndash2501 doi101002jcc23423

[63] M Savarese P A Netti C Adamo N Rega I Cioni Exploring the metric of excited state proton transfer reactions J Phys Chem B117 (50) (2013) 16165ndash16173 doi101021jp406301p

[64] T Le Bahers E Bremond I Cioni C Adamo The nature of vertical excited states of dyes containing metals for DSSC applicationsinsights from TD-DFT and density based indexes Phys Chem Chem Phys 16 (2014) 14435ndash14444 doi101039C3CP55032J

[65] M Savarese C A Guido E Breacutemond I Cioni C Adamo Metrics for molecular electronic excitations A comparison between orbital- anddensity-based descriptors J Phys Chem A 121 (40) (2017) 7543ndash7549 doi101021acsjpca7b07080

[66] T Etienne X Assfeld A Monari New insight into the topology of excited states through detachmentattachment density matrices-basedcentroids of charge J Chem Theory Comput 10 (9) (2014) 3906ndash3914 doi101021ct500400s

[67] T Etienne X Assfeld A Monari Toward a quantitative assessment of electronic transitionsrsquo charge-transfer character J Chem TheoryComput 10 (9) (2014) 3896ndash3905 doi101021ct5003994

[68] M J G Peach P Beneld T Helgaker D J Tozer Excitation energies in density functional theory An evaluation and a diagnostic test JChem Phys 128 (4) (2008) 44118 doi10106312831900

[69] E Ronca M Pastore L Belpassi F De Angelis C Angeli R Cimiraglia F Tarantelli Charge-displacement analysis for excited states JChem Phys 140 (5) (2014) 054110 doi10106314863411

[70] F Plasser H Lischka Analysis of excitonic and charge transfer interactions from quantum chemical calculations J Chem Theory Comput8 (8) (2012) 2777ndash2789 doi101021ct300307c

[71] F Plasser M Wormit A Dreuw New tools for the systematic analysis and visualization of electronic excitations I formalism J ChemPhys 141 (2) (2014) 024106 doi10106314885819

[72] S A Baumlppler F Plasser M Wormit A Dreuw Exciton analysis of many-body wave functions Bridging the gap between the quasiparticleand molecular orbital pictures Phys Rev A 90 (2014) 052521 doi101103PhysRevA90052521

[73] F Plasser B Thomitzni S A Baeppler J Wenzel D R Rehn M Wormit A Dreuw Statistical analysis of electronic excitation processesSpatial location compactness charge transfer and electron-hole correlation J Comput Chemdoi101002jcc23975

[74] F Plasser L Gonzaacutelez Communication Unambiguous comparison of many-electron wavefunctions through their overlaps J Chem Phys145 (2) (2016) 021103 doi10106314958462

[75] F Plasser G Granucci J Pittner M Barbatti M Persico H Lischka Surface hopping dynamics using a locally diabatic formalismCharge transfer in the ethylene dimer cation and excited state dynamics in the 2-pyridone dimer J Chem Phys 137 (22) (2012) 22A514doidoi10106314738960

[76] F Plasser A J A Aquino W L Hase H Lischka UV absorption spectrum of alternating DNA duplexes Analysis of excitonic and chargetransfer interactions J Phys Chem A 116 (46) (2012) 11151ndash11160 doi101021jp304725r

[77] F Plasser A J A Aquino H Lischka D Nachtigallovaacute Electronic excitation processes in single-strand and double-strand DNA Acomputational approach in M Barbatti A C Borin S Ullrich (Eds) Photoinduced Phenomena in Nucleic Acids II Vol 356 of Topics inCurrent Chemistry Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015 pp 1ndash37 doi101007128_2013_517URL httpdxdoiorg101007128_2013_517

[78] J J Nogueira F Plasser L Gonzaacutelez Electronic delocalization charge transfer and hypochromism in the UV absorption spectrum

35

of polyadenine unravelled by multiscale computations and quantitative wavefunction analysis Chem Sci 8 (2017) 5682ndash5691 doi101039C7SC01600J

[79] S A Mewes J-M Mewes A Dreuw F Plasser Excitons in poly(para phenylene vinylene) a quantum-chemical perspective based onhigh-level ab initio calculations Phys Chem Chem Phys 18 (2016) 2548ndash2563 doi101039C5CP07077E

[80] S A Mewes F Plasser A Dreuw Universal Exciton Size in Organic Polymers is Determined by Non-Local Orbital Exchange in TDDFT JPhys Chem Lett 8 (6) (2017) 1205ndash1210 doi101021acsjpclett7b00157

[81] F Plasser A Dreuw High-level ab initio computations of the absorption spectra of organic iridium complexes J Phys Chem A 119 (6)(2015) 1023ndash1036 doi101021jp5122917

[82] F Plasser TheoDORE A package for theoretical density orbital relaxation and exciton analysis httptheodore-qcsourceforgenet (2017)[83] E J Baerends T Ziegler A J Atkins J Autschbach D Bashford O Baseggio A Beacuterces F M Bickelhaupt C Bo P M Boerritger L Cavallo

C Daul D P Chong D V Chulhai L Deng R M Dickson J M Dieterich D E Ellis M van Faassen A Ghysels A Giammona S J A vanGisbergen A Goez A W Goumltz S Gusarov F E Harris P van den Hoek Z Hu C R Jacob H Jacobsen L Jensen L Joubert J W KaminskiG van Kessel C Koumlnig F Kootstra A Kovalenko M Krykunov E van Lenthe D A McCormack A Michalak M Mitoraj S M MortonJ Neugebauer V P Nicu L Noodleman V P Osinga S Patchkovskii M Pavanello C A Peeples P H T Philipsen D Post C C PyeH Ramanantoanina P Ramos W Ravenek J I Rodriacuteguez P Ros R Ruumlger P R T Schipper D Schluumlns H van Schoot G SchreckenbachJ S Seldenthuis M Seth J G Snijders M Solagrave S M M Swart D Swerhone G te Velde V Tognetti P Vernooijs L Versluis L VisscherO Visser F Wang T A Wesolowski E M van Wezenbeek G Wiesenekker S K Wol T K Woo A L Yakovlev Amsterdam densityfunctional modeling suite 2017 SCM Theoretical Chemistry Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Netherlands httpswwwscmcom

[84] Y Shao et al Advances in molecular quantum chemistry contained in the Q-Chem 4 program package Mol Phys 113 (2) (2015) 184ndash215[85] F Aquilante J Autschbach R K Carlson L F Chibotaru M G Delcey L De Vico I Fdez Galvaacuten N Ferreacute L M Frutos L Gagliardi

M Garavelli A Giussani C E Hoyer G Li Manni H Lischka D Ma P-Aring Malmqvist T Muumlller A Nenov M Olivucci T B PedersenD Peng F Plasser B Pritchard M Reiher I Rivalta I Schapiro J Segarra-Martiacute M Stenrup D G Truhlar L Ungur A ValentiniS Vancoillie V Veryazov V P Vysotskiy O Weingart F Zapata R Lindh Molcas 8 New capabilities for multicongurational quantumchemical calculations across the periodic table J Comput Chem 37 (2015) 506ndash541 doi101002jcc24221

[86] F Plasser S A Mewes A Dreuw L Gonzaacutelez Detailed Wave Function Analysis for Multireference Methods Implementation in the MolcasProgram Package and Applications to Tetracene J Chem Theory Comput 13 (11) (2017) 5343ndash5353 doi101021acsjctc7b00718

[87] F Furche R Ahlrichs Adiabatic time-dependent density functional methods for excited state properties J Chem Phys 117 (16) (2002)7433ndash7447 doi10106311508368

[88] S Hirata M Head-Gordon Time-dependent density functional theory within the TammacircĂŞDanco approximation Chem Phys Lett314 (3-4) (1999) 291ndash299 doi101016S0009-2614(99)01149-5

[89] M J G Peach D J Tozer Overcoming low orbital overlap and triplet instability problems in TDDFT J Phys Chem A 116 (2012) 9783ndash9789doi101021jp308662x

[90] S A Mewes F Plasser A Dreuw Communication Exciton analysis in time-dependent density functional theory How functionals shapeexcited-state characters J Chem Phys 143 (2015) 171101 doi10106314935178

[91] T Etienne Transition matrices and orbitals from reduced density matrix theory J Chem Phys 142 (2015) 244103 doi10106314922780[92] K Dedeian P I Djurovich F O Garces G Carlson R J Watts A new synthetic route to the preparation of a series of strong photoreducing

agents fac-tris-ortho-metalated complexes of iridium(III) with substituted 2-phenylpyridines Inorg Chem 30 (8) (1991) 1685ndash1687doi101021ic00008a003

[93] R van Meer O V Gritsenko E J Baerends Physical meaning of virtual Kohn-Sham orbitals and orbital energies An ideal basis for thedescription of molecular excitations J Chem Theory Comput 10 (10) (2014) 4432ndash4441 doi101021ct500727c

[94] A V Luzanov A A Sukhorukov V E Umanskii Application of transition density matrix for analysis of excited states Theor Exp Chem10 (4) (1976) 354ndash361 doi101007BF00526670

[95] R L Martin Natural transition orbitals J Chem Phys 118 (11) (2003) 4775ndash4777 doi10106311558471[96] P R Surjaacuten Natural orbitals in CIS and singular-value decomposition Chem Phys Lett 439 (4-6) (2007) 393ndash394 doi101016jcplett

200703094[97] I Mayer Identifying a pair of interacting chromophores by using SVD transformed CIS wave functions Chem Phys Lett 443 (4-6) (2007)

420ndash425 doiDOI101016jcplett200706074[98] F Plasser Entanglement entropy of electronic excitations J Chem Phys 144 (19) (2016) 194107 doi10106314949535[99] E S S Iyer A Sadybekov O Lioubashevski A I Krylov S Ruhman Rewriting the Story of Excimer Formation in Liquid Benzene J Phys

Chem A 121 (9) (2017) 1962ndash1975 doi101021acsjpca7b01070[100] K D Nanda A I Krylov Visualizing the Contributions of Virtual States to Two-Photon Absorption Cross Sections by Natural Transition

Orbitals of Response Transition Density Matrices J Phys Chem Lett 8 (14) (2017) 3256ndash3265 doi101021acsjpclett7b01422[101] M Head-Gordon A M Grana D Maurice C A White Analysis of Electronic Transitions as the Dierence of Electron Attachment and

Detachment Densities J Chem Phys 99 (39) (1995) 14261ndash14270 doi101021j100039a012[102] N C Handy H F Schaefer On the evaluation of analytic energy derivatives for correlated wave functions J Chem Phys 81 (11) (1984)

5031ndash5033 doidoi1010631447489[103] F Plasser S A Baumlppler M Wormit A Dreuw New tools for the systematic analysis and visualization of electronic excitations II

applications J Chem Phys 141 (2) (2014) 024107 doi10106314885820[104] A V Luzanov O A Zhikol Electron Invariants and Excited State Structural Analysis for Electronic Transitions Within CIS RPA and

TDDFT Models Int J Quant Chem 110 (4) (2010) 902ndash924 doiDoi101002Qua22041[105] S M Bachrach Population analysis and electron densities from quantum mechanics in Rev Comput Chem Vol 5 2007 pp 171ndash228

doi1010029780470125823ch3URL httpdxdoiorg1010029780470125823ch3

[106] A A Voityuk Fragment transition density method to calculate electronic coupling for excitation energy transfer J Chem Phys 140 (24)(2014) 244117 doi10106314884944

36

[107] I Mayer Bond orders and valences from ab initio wave functions Int J Quantum Chem 29 (3) (1986) 477ndash483 doi101002qua560290320[108] S Matsika X Feng A V Luzanov A I Krylov What we can learn from the norms of one-particle density matrices and what we canrsquot

Some results for interstate properties in model singlet ssion systems J Phys Chem A 118 (2014) 11943ndash55 doi101021jp506090g[109] S A Mewes F Plasser A I Krylov A Dreuw Benchmarking excited-state calculations using exciton properties submitted[110] E Zojer P Buchacher F Wudl J Cornil J P Calbert J L Breeacutedas G Leising Excited state localization in organic molecules consisting of

conjugated and nonconjugated segments J Chem Phys 113 (22) (2000) 10002 doi10106311323263[111] J Rissler H Baumlssler F Gebhard P Schwerdtfeger Excited states of ladder-type poly-p-phenylene oligomers Phys Rev B 64 (2001) 045122

doi101103PhysRevB64045122[112] S Tretiak S Mukamel Density matrix analysis and simulation of electronic excitations in conjugated and aggregated molecules Chem

Rev 102 (9) (2002) 3171ndash3212 doiDoi101021Cr0101252[113] V Vallet L Maron C Teichteil J-P Flament A two-step uncontracted determinantal eective Hamiltonian-based SO-CI method J Chem

Phys 113 (4) (2000) 1391ndash1402 doi1010631481929[114] C M Marian Spin-orbit coupling and intersystem crossing in molecules WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2 (2) (2012) 187ndash203 doi101002

wcms83[115] S Mai T Muumlller P Marquetand F Plasser H Lischka L Gonzaacutelez Perturbational treatment of spin-orbit coupling for generally applicable

high-level multi-reference methods J Chem Phys 141 (2014) 074105 doi10106314892060[116] F Wang T Ziegler A simplied relativistic time-dependent density-functional theory formalism for the calculations of excitation energies

including spin-orbit coupling eect J Chem Phys 123 (15) (2005) 154102 doi10106312061187[117] S Mai P Marquetand L Gonzaacutelez A general method to describe intersystem crossing dynamics in trajectory surface hopping Int J

Quantum Chem 115 (18) (2015) 1215ndash1231 doi101002qua24891[118] B J Powell Conservation laws radiative decay rates and excited state localization in organometallic complexes with strong spin-orbit

coupling Sci Rep 5 (2015) 10815 doi101038srep10815[119] G J Stor D J Stufkens A Oskam Electronic absorption and resonance raman spectra of tricarbonyl(p-tolyl-14-diaza-13-

butadiene)halorhenium evidence for a lowest ligand to ligand charge-transfer (LLCT) transition Inorg Chem 31 (8) (1992) 1318ndash1319doi101021ic00034a005

[120] A M Blanco-Rodriacuteguez A Gabrielsson M Motevalli P Matousek M Towrie J Šebera S Zaacuteliš A Vlček Ligand-to-diiminemetal-to-diimine charge-transfer excited states of [Re(NCS)(CO)3(Icircś-diimine)] (α -diimine = 22acircĂŸ-bipyridine di-ipr-nn-14-diazabutadiene) aspectroscopic and computational study J Phys Chem A 109 (23) (2005) 5016ndash5025 doi101021jp044114z

[121] F Murtagh P Contreras Algorithms for hierarchical clustering an overview WIREs Data Min Knowl Discov 2 (1) (2012) 86ndash97doi101002widm53

[122] F Murtagh P Contreras Algorithms for hierarchical clustering an overview II WIREs Data Min Knowl Discov 7 (6) (2017) e1219ndashnae1219 doi101002widm1219

[123] S van Dongen A J Enright Metric distances derived from cosine similarity and pearson and spearman correlations ArXiv (2012) 12083145[124] A R Bin Mohd Yuso A J Huckaba M K Nazeeruddin Phosphorescent neutral iridium (III) complexes for organic light-emitting diodes

Top Curr Chem 375 (2) (2017) 39 doi101007s41061-017-0126-7[125] C-L Ho H Li W-Y Wong Red to near-infrared organometallic phosphorescent dyes for OLED applications J Organomet Chem

751 (Supplement C) (2014) 261 ndash 285 doi101016jjorganchem201309035[126] Y You W Nam Photofunctional triplet excited states of cyclometalated ir(III) complexes beyond electroluminescence Chem Soc Rev 41

(2012) 7061ndash7084 doi101039C2CS35171D[127] Y Chi P-T Chou Transition-metal phosphors with cyclometalating ligands fundamentals and applications Chem Soc Rev 39 (2010)

638ndash655 doi101039B916237B[128] F De Angelis S Fantacci N Evans C Klein S M Zakeeruddin J-E Moser K Kalyanasundaram H J Bolink M Graumltzel M K Nazeeruddin

Controlling phosphorescence color and quantum yields in cationic iridium complexes A combined experimental and theoretical studyInorg Chem 46 (15) (2007) 5989ndash6001 doi101021ic700435c

[129] B Minaev H Aringgren F D Angelis Theoretical design of phosphorescence parameters for organic electro-luminescence devices based oniridium complexes Chem Phys 358 (3) (2009) 245 ndash 257 doihttpsdoiorg101016jchemphys200902014

[130] A F Henwood E Zysman-Colman Luminescent iridium complexes used in light-emitting electrochemical cells (LEECs) Top Curr Chem374 (4) (2016) 36 doi101007s41061-016-0036-0

[131] K K-W Lo Luminescent rhenium(I) and iridium(III) polypyridine complexes as biological probes imaging reagents and photocytotoxicagents Acc Chem Res 48 (12) (2015) 2985ndash2995 doi101021acsaccounts5b00211

[132] P J Hay Theoretical studies of the ground and excited electronic states in cyclometalated phenylpyridine Ir(III) complexes using densityfunctional theory J Phys Chem A 106 (8) (2002) 1634ndash1641 doi101021jp013949w

[133] K Nozaki Theoretical studies on photophysical properties and mechanism of phosphorescence in [fac-Ir(2-phenylpyridine)3] J ChinChem Soc 53 (1) (2006) 101ndash112 doi101002jccs200600013

[134] N Zhao Y-H Wu H-M Wen X Zhang Z-N Chen Conversion from ILCT to LLCTMLCT excited state by heavy metal ion binding iniridium(III) complexes with functionalized 22rsquo-bipyridyl ligands Organometallics 28 (19) (2009) 5603ndash5611 doi101021om900334f

[135] T Liu B-H Xia Q-C Zheng X Zhou Q-J Pan H-X Zhang DFTTD-DFT investigation on ir(III) complexes with n-heterocycliccarbene ligands Geometries electronic structures absorption and phosphorescence properties J Comput Chem 31 (3) (2010) 628ndash638doi101002jcc21360

[136] N Tian D Lenkeit S Pelz L H Fischer D Escudero R Schiewek D Klink O J Schmitz L GonzAtildeąlez M SchAtildeďferling E HolderStructurendashproperty relationship of red- and green-emitting iridium(III) complexes with respect to their temperature and oxygen sensitivityEur J Inorg Chem 2010 (30) (2010) 4875ndash4885 doi101002ejic201000610

[137] X Li B Minaev H Aringgren H Tian Theoretical study of phosphorescence of iridium complexes with uorine-substituted phenylpyridineligands Eur J Inorg Chem 2011 (16) (2011) 2517ndash2524 doi101002ejic201100084

[138] A R G Smith P L Burn B J Powell Spin-orbit coupling in phosphorescent iridium(III) complexes ChemPhysChem 12 (13) (2011)

37

2429ndash2438 doi101002cphc201100397[139] Y Su L-H Kang Theoretical studies of ground and excited electronic states in a series of heteroleptic iridium complexes using density

functional theory Int J Quantum Chem 112 (11) (2012) 2422ndash2428 doi101002qua23262[140] H Brahim C Daniel Structural and spectroscopic properties of ir(III) complexes with phenylpyridine ligands Absorption spectra without

and with spin-orbit-coupling Comp Theor Chem 1040-1041 (2014) 219ndash229 doi101016jcomptc201401030[141] K P S Zanoni B K Kariyazaki A Ito M K Brennaman T J Meyer N Y Murakami Iha Blue-green iridium(III) emitter and comprehensive

photophysical elucidation of heteroleptic cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes Inorg Chem 53 (8) (2014) 4089ndash4099 doi101021ic500070s

[142] M Kleinschmidt C van Wuumlllen C M Marian Intersystem-crossing and phosphorescence rates in fac-IrIII(ppy)3 A theoretical studyinvolving multi-reference conguration interaction wavefunctions J Chem Phys 142 (9) (2015) 094301 doi10106314913513

[143] A R Smith P L Burn B J Powell Exact exchange and the density functional theory of metal-to-ligand charge-transfer in fac-Ir(ppy)3Org Electron 33 (Supplement C) (2016) 110 ndash 115 doihttpsdoiorg101016jorgel201602039

[144] A Heil K Gollnisch M Kleinschmidt C M Marian On the photophysics of four heteroleptic iridium(III) phenylpyridyl complexesinvestigated by relativistic multi-conguration methods Mol Phys 114 (3-4) (2016) 407ndash422 doi1010800026897620151076902

[145] G Treboux J Mizukami M Yabe S Nakamura Blue phosphorescent iridium(III) complex a reaction path on the triplet potential energysurface Chem Lett 36 (11) (2007) 1344ndash1345 doi101246cl20071344

[146] T Sajoto P I Djurovich A B Tamayo J Oxgaard W A Goddard M E Thompson Temperature dependence of blue phosphorescentcyclometalated Ir(III) complexes J Am Chem Soc 131 (28) (2009) 9813ndash9822 pMID 19537720 doi101021ja903317w

[147] L Yang F Okuda K Kobayashi K Nozaki Y Tanabe Y Ishii M-a Haga Syntheses and phosphorescent properties of blue emissiveiridium complexes with tridentate pyrazolyl ligands Inorg Chem 47 (16) (2008) 7154ndash7165 doi101021ic800196s

[148] A Giussani J Segarra-Martiacute D Roca-Sanjuaacuten M Merchaacuten Excitation of nucleobases from a computational perspective I Reaction pathsin M Barbatti A C Borin S Ullrich (Eds) Photoinduced Phenomena in Nucleic Acids I Vol 355 of Topics in Current Chemistry SpringerBerlin Heidelberg 2015 pp 57ndash97 doi101007128_2013_501URL httpdxdoiorg101007128_2013_501

[149] A R G Smith M J Riley S-C Lo P L Burn I R Gentle B J Powell Relativistic eects in a phosphorescent ir(III) complex Phys Rev B83 (2011) 041105 doi101103PhysRevB83041105

[150] A E Friedman J C Chambron J P Sauvage N J Turro J K Barton A molecular light switch for DNA Ru(bpy)2(dppz)2+ J Am ChemSoc 112 (12) (1990) 4960ndash4962 doi101021ja00168a052

[151] E J C Olson D Hu A Houmlrmann A M Jonkman M R Arkin E D A Stemp J K Barton P F Barbara First observation of the keyintermediate in the ldquolight-switchrdquo mechanism of [Ru(phen)2dppz]2+ J Am Chem Soc 119 (47) (1997) 11458ndash11467 doi101021ja971151d

[152] W Chen C Turro L A Friedman J K Barton N J Turro Resonance raman investigation of Ru(phen)2(dppz)2+ and related complexes inwater and in the presence of DNA J Phys Chem B 101 (35) (1997) 6995ndash7000 doi101021jp970423w

[153] C G Coates J Olofsson M Coletti J J McGarvey B Oumlnfelt P Lincoln B Norden E Tuite P Matousek A W Parker Picosecondtime-resolved resonance raman probing of the light-switch states of [Ru(Phen)2dppz]2+ J Phys Chem B 105 (50) (2001) 12653ndash12664doi101021jp0127115

[154] M K Brennaman J H Alstrum-Acevedo C N Fleming P Jang T J Meyer J M Papanikolas Turning the [Ru(bpy)2dppz]2+ light-switchon and o with temperature J Am Chem Soc 124 (50) (2002) 15094ndash15098 doi101021ja0279139

[155] M K Brennaman T J Meyer J M Papanikolas [Ru(bpy)2dppz]2+ light-switch mechanism in protic solvents as studied through temperature-dependent lifetime measurements J Phys Chem A 108 (45) (2004) 9938ndash9944 doi101021jp0479670

[156] Y Sun C Turro Highly solvent dependent luminescence from [Ru(bpy)n (dppp2)3minusn ]2+ (n = 0ndash2) Inorganic Chemistry 49 (11) (2010)5025ndash5032 doi101021ic100106b

[157] Y Sun S N Collins L E Joyce C Turro Unusual photophysical properties of a ruthenium(II) complex related to [Ru(bpy)2(dppz)]2+Inorg Chem 49 (9) (2010) 4257ndash4262 doi101021ic9025365

[158] Y Sun Y Liu C Turro Ultrafast dynamics of the low-lying 3MLCT states of [Ru(bpy)2(dppp2)]2+ J Am Chem Soc 132 (16) (2010)5594ndash5595 pMID 20364825 doi101021ja101703w

[159] Y Sun M El Ojaimi R Hammitt R P Thummel C Turro Eect of ligands with extended π -system on the photophysical properties ofru(II) complexes J Phys Chem B 114 (45) (2010) 14664ndash14670 doi101021jp102613n

[160] E Jakubikova W Chen D M Dattelbaum F N Rein R C Rocha R L Martin E R Batista Electronic structure and spectroscopy of[Ru(tpy)2]2+ [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(H2O)]2+ and [Ru(tpy)(bpy)(Cl)]+ Inorg Chem 48 (22) (2009) 10720ndash10725 pMID 19842666 doi101021ic901477m

[161] G Pourtois D Beljonne C Moucheron S Schumm A Kirsch-De Mesmaeker R Lazzaroni J-L Breacutedas Photophysical properties ofruthenium(II) polyazaaromatic compounds A theoretical insight J Am Chem Soc 126 (2) (2004) 683ndash692 doi101021ja034444h

[162] S Fantacci F D Angelis A Sgamellotti N Re A TDDFT study of the ruthenium(II) polyazaaromatic complex [Ru(dppz)(phen)2]2+ insolution Chemical Physics Letters 396 (1) (2004) 43 ndash 48 doi101016jcplett200407101

[163] S Fantacci F De Angelis A Sgamellotti A Marrone N Re Photophysical properties of [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ intercalated into DNA Anintegrated Car-Parrinello and TDDFT study J Am Chem Soc 127 (41) (2005) 14144ndash14145 doi101021ja054368d

[164] E R Batista R L Martin On the excited states involved in the luminescent probe [Ru(bpy)2dppz]2+ J Phys Chem A 109 (14) (2005)3128ndash3133 pMID 16833639 doi101021jp050673+

[165] M Atsumi L Gonzaacutelez C Daniel Spectroscopy of Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes used as intercalators in DNA Towards a theoretical studyof the light switch eect J Photoch Photobiol A Chem 190 (2007) 310ndash320 doi101016jjphotochem200701015

[166] A Chantzis T Very C Daniel A Monari X Assfeld Theoretical evidence of photo-induced charge transfer from DNA to intercalatedruthenium (II) organometallic complexes Chem Phys Lett 578 (Supplement C) (2013) 133 ndash 137 doi101016jcplett201305068

[167] D Ambrosek P-F Loos X Assfeld C Daniel A theoretical study of Ru(II) polypyridyl DNA intercalators Structure and electronicabsorption spectroscopy of [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ and [Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ complexes intercalated in guanine-cytosine base pairs J InorgBiochem 104 (9) (2010) 893 ndash 901 doi101016jjinorgbio201004002

38

[168] C G Coates J J McGarvey P L Callaghan M Coletti J G Hamilton Probing the interaction of [Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ with single-stranded DNAmdashwhat degree of protection is required for operation of the ldquolight-switch eectrdquo J Phys Chem B 105 (3) (2001) 730ndash735doi101021jp002856w

[169] A W McKinley P Lincoln E M Tuite Environmental eects on the photophysics of transition metal complexes with dipyrido[23-a3rsquo2rsquo-c]phenazine (dppz) and related ligands Coord Chem Rev 255 (21) (2011) 2676 ndash 2692 doi101016jccr201106012

[170] I Ortmans B Elias J M Kelly C Moucheron A Kirsch-DeMesmaeker [Ru(TAP)2(dppz)]2+ a DNA intercalating complex whichluminesces strongly in water and undergoes photo-induced proton-coupled electron transfer with guanosine-5rsquo-monophosphate DaltonTrans (2004) 668ndash676doi101039B313213G

[171] B Elias C Creely G Doorley M Feeney C Moucheron A Kirsch-DeMesmaeker J Dyer D Grills M George P Matousek A ParkerM Towrie J Kelly Photooxidation of guanine by a ruthenium dipyridophenazine complex intercalated in a double-stranded polynucleotidemonitored directly by picosecond visible and infrared transient absorption spectroscopy Chem Eur J 14 (1) (2008) 369ndash375 doi101002chem200700564

[172] J Olofsson B Oumlnfelt P Lincoln Three-state light switch of [Ru(phen)2dppz]2+ Distinct excited-state species with two one or no hydrogenbonds from solvent J Phys Chem A 108 (20) (2004) 4391ndash4398 doi101021jp037967k

[173] J J Warren M E Ener A Vlček J R Winkler H B Gray Electron hopping through proteins Coord Chem Rev 256 (21) (2012) 2478 ndash2487 doi101016jccr201203032

[174] T N Twala M Schutte-Smith A Roodt H G Visser Activation of the manganese(I) tricarbonyl core by selective variation of bidentateligands (LLprime-bid = NNprime and NO donor atom sets) in fac-[Mn(CO)3(LLprime-Bid)(CH3OH)]n complexes Dalton Trans 44 (2015) 3278ndash3288doi101039C4DT03524K

[175] A El Nahhas R M van der Veen T J Penfold V T Pham F A Lima R Abela A M Blanco-Rodriguez S Zaacuteliš A Vlček I TavernelliU Rothlisberger C J Milne M Chergui X-ray absorption spectroscopy of ground and excited rhenium-carbonyl-diimine complexesEvidence for a two-center electron transfer J Phys Chem A 117 (2) (2013) 361ndash369 doi101021jp3106502

[176] S Zaacuteliš C Consani A E Nahhas A Cannizzo M Chergui F Hartl A Vlček Origin of electronic absorption spectra of MLCT-excitedand one-electron reduced 22rsquo-bipyridine and 110-phenanthroline complexes Inorg Chim Acta 374 (1) (2011) 578 ndash 585 doihttpsdoiorg101016jica201102084

[177] A El Nahhas C Consani A M Blanco-Rodriacuteguez K M Lancaster O Braem A Cannizzo M Towrie I P Clark S Zaacuteliš M CherguiA Vlček Ultrafast excited-state dynamics of rhenium(I) photosensitizers [Re(Cl)(CO)3(NN)] and [Re(imidazole)(CO)3(NN)]+ Diimineeects Inorg Chem 50 (7) (2011) 2932ndash2943 doi101021ic102324p

[178] A Cannizzo A M Blanco-Rodriacuteguez A El Nahhas J Šebera S Zaacuteliš A Vlček Jr M Chergui Femtosecond uorescence and intersystemcrossing in rhenium(I) carbonyl-bipyridine complexes J Am Chem Soc 130 (28) (2008) 8967ndash8974 doi101021ja710763w

[179] S Mai H Gattuso M Fumanal A Muntildeoz Losa A Monari C Daniel L Gonzaacutelez Excited-states of a rhenium carbonyl diiminecomplex Solvation models spin-orbit coupling and vibrational sampling eects Phys Chem Chem Phys 19 (2017) 27240ndash27250doi101039C7CP05126C

[180] Y Harabuchi J Eng E Gindensperger T Taketsugu S Maeda C Daniel Exploring the mechanism of ultrafast intersystem crossing inrhenium(I) carbonyl bipyridine halide complexes Key vibrational modes and spinndashvibronic quantum dynamics J Chem Theory Comput12 (5) (2016) 2335ndash2345 doi101021acsjctc6b00080

[181] J Eng C Gourlaouen E Gindensperger C Daniel Spin-vibronic quantum dynamics for ultrafast excited-state processes Acc Chem Res48 (3) (2015) 809ndash817 doi101021ar500369r

[182] J R Winkler H B Gray Electron transfer in ruthenium-modied proteins Chem Rev 92 (3) (1992) 369ndash379 doi101021cr00011a001[183] C Shih A K Museth M Abrahamsson A M Blanco-Rodriacuteguez A J Di Bilio J Sudhamsu B R Crane K L Ronayne M Towrie A Vlček

J H Richards J R Winkler H B Gray Tryptophan-accelerated electron ow through proteins Science 320 (5884) (2008) 1760ndash1762doi101126science1158241

[184] A J Atkins F Talotta L Freitag M Boggio-Pasqua L Gonzaacutelez Assessing excited state energy gaps with time-dependent densityfunctional theory on Ru(II) complexes J Chem Theory Comput 13 (9) (2017) 4123ndash4145 doi101021acsjctc7b00379

[185] J P Perdew K Burke M Ernzerhof Generalized gradient approximation made simple Phys Rev Lett 77 (1996) 3865ndash3868 doi101103PhysRevLett773865

[186] A D Becke Density-functional thermochemistry III the role of exact exchange J Chem Phys 98 (1993) 5648ndash5652 doi1010631464913[187] C Adamo V Barone Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters The PBE0 model J Chem Phys 110 (13)

(1999) 6158ndash6170 doi1010631478522[188] M Seth T Ziegler Range-separated exchange functionals with slater-type functions J Chem Theory Comput 8 (3) (2012) 901ndash907

doi101021ct300006h[189] Y Zhao D G Truhlar The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry thermochemical kinetics noncovalent

interactions excited states and transition elements two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 otherfunctionals Theor Chem Acc 120 (1) (2008) 215ndash241 doi101007s00214-007-0310-x

[190] J-D Chai M Head-Gordon Systematic optimization of long-range corrected hybrid density functionals J Chem Phys 128 (8) (2008)084106 doi10106312834918

[191] J Schirmer Beyond the random-phase approximation A new approximation scheme for the polarization propagator Phys Rev A 26 (1982)2395ndash2416 doi101103PhysRevA262395

[192] J Schirmer A B Tromov Intermediate state representation approach to physical properties of electronically excited molecules J ChemPhys 120 (24) (2004) 11449ndash11464 doi10106311752875

[193] P H P Harbach M Wormit A Dreuw The third-order algebraic diagrammatic construction method (ADC(3)) for the polarization propagatorfor closed-shell molecules Ecient implementation and benchmarking J Chem Phys 141 (6) (2014) 064113 doi10106314892418

[194] F Plasser M Ruckenbauer S Mai M Oppel P Marquetand L Gonzaacutelez Ecient and exible computation of many-electron wave functionoverlaps J Chem Theory Comput 12 (2016) 1207 doi101021acsjctc5b01148

[195] M J Bearpark M A Robb H B Schlegel A direct method for the location of the lowest energy point on a potential surface crossing

39

Chem Phys Lett 223 (1994) 269 doi1010160009-2614(94)00433-1[196] F Neese The ORCA program system WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2 (1) (2012) 73ndash78 doi101002wcms81[197] R Schinke Photodissociation Dynamics Spectroscopy and Fragmentation of Small Polyatomic Molecules Cambridge University Press

1995[198] J P Dahl M Springborg The morse oscillator in position space momentum space and phase space J Chem Phys 88 (7) (1988) 4535ndash4547

doidoi1010631453761[199] D Andrae U Haumluszligermann M Dolg H Stoll H Preuszlig Energy-adjusted ab initio pseudopotentials for the second and third row transition

elements Theoretica chimica acta 77 (2) (1990) 123ndash141 doi101007BF01114537[200] F Weigend R Ahlrichs Balanced basis sets of split valence triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn Design and

assessment of accuracy Phys Chem Chem Phys 7 (18) (2005) 3297ndash3305 doi101039B508541A[201] B O Roos R Lindh P-Aring Malmqvist V Veryazov P-O Widmark Main group atoms and dimers studied with a new relativistic ANO basis

set J Phys Chem A 108 (15) (2004) 2851ndash2858 doi101021jp031064+[202] G Ghigo B O Roos P-Aring Malmqvist A modied denition of the zeroth-order hamiltonian in multicongurational perturbation theory

(CASPT2) Chem Phys Lett 396 (13) (2004) 142ndash149 doi101016jcplett200408032

40

Supporting Information

CASSCF active space orbitals

Figure 19 shows the active space orbitals employed for the CASPT2(1212) calculations on Re(CO)3(Cl)(bipy) inSections 33 and 45

pCl pCl πbipy dRe

dRe dRe πlowastbipy πlowast

bipy

πlowastbipy πlowast

CO πlowastCO πlowast

CO

Figure 19 Active space orbitals employed for the CASPT2(1212) calculations on Re(CO)3(Cl)(bipy)

Molecular geometries

On the following pages all geometries used for calculations in this work are given in XYZ le format

41

61Ir(ppy)3 S0 min (Plasser2015JPCA)Ir +0000000 +0000000 -0004130N +0872090 -1626490 -1091240N -1844620 +0057990 -1091240C -0595800 +1616650 +1037790C +1697960 -0292350 +1037790C +2058050 -2056070 -0602390C +2539790 -1326530 +0561610N +0972530 +1568500 -1091240C -1102160 -1324300 +1037790C +0751580 +2810360 -0602390C -0121090 +2862790 +0561610C -2809630 -0754290 -0602390C -2418710 -1536260 +0561610C +2146600 +0405050 +2166320C +3346570 +0098370 +2786510C +4158150 -0923160 +2301150C +3750830 -1632120 +1189840C +2713190 -3127730 -1213780C +2153700 -3748950 -2309560C +0932340 -3297200 -2792440C +0331210 -2237130 -2147150C +1771800 +1405400 -2147150C +2389290 +2456030 -2792440C +2169830 +3739640 -2309560C +1352100 +3913560 -1213780C -0461960 +4064380 +1189840C -1279590 +4062650 +2301150C -1758480 +2849030 +2786510C -1424090 +1656490 +2166320C -3288880 -2432250 +1189840C -2878560 -3139490 +2301150C -1588090 -2947400 +2786510C -0722520 -2061540 +2166320C -2103010 +0831730 -2147150C -4065290 -0785830 -1213780C -4323540 +0009310 -2309560C -3321630 +0841170 -2792440H +1534880 +1202570 +2572330H +3656510 +0660800 +3661810H +5096180 -1161210 +2788940H +4382550 -2429350 +0812910H +3659240 -3471620 -0818000H +2660480 -4582420 -2782450H +0449130 -3757680 -3644210H -0626110 -1850990 -2476620H +1916060 +0383270 -2476620H +3029680 +2267800 -3644210H +2638260 +4595250 -2782450H +1176890 +4904810 -0818000H -0087390 +5010080 +0812910H -1542450 +4994020 +2788940H -2400520 +2836230 +3661810H -1808890 +0727960 +2572330H -4295160 -2580720 +0812910H -3553720 -3832810 +2788940H -1255990 -3497030 +3661810H +0274020 -1930530 +2572330H -1289950 +1467720 -2476620H -4836130 -1433190 -0818000H -5298730 -0012830 -2782450H -3478810 +1489880 -3644210

61Ir(ppy)3 T1 min (U-B3LYPRe-TZPCN-DZPH-DZ)Ir -0001360 -0002890 +0016651N +0864530 -1621537 -1116951N -1788054 +0063817 -1115843C -0604282 +1628727 +1028030C +1722602 -0301155 +1041560C +2053296 -2059729 -0628370C +2540486 -1349606 +0552649N +1001527 +1563058 -1094178C -1058610 -1303569 +1065250C +0770279 +2810317 -0613998C -0115685 +2867829 +0544268C -2786454 -0797736 -0607181C -2428702 -1506881 +0545899C +2180215 +0413185 +2152090C +3380598 +0092059 +2770284C +4167664 -0955174 +2290481C +3749540 -1670477 +1182289C +2707307 -3111466 -1277981C +2139546 -3696411 -2393704C +0911229 -3236000 -2862690C +0306496 -2194426 -2187444C +1824195 +1372887 -2129337C +2450659 +2418708 -2777455C +2214890 +3711528 -2316879C +1378613 +3905768 -1234366C -0472851 +4069790 +1166855C -1310829 +4063452 +2267073C -1803751 +2850110 +2748547C -1457765 +1654933 +2136044C -3285956 -2414430 +1234828C -2828995 -3094713 +2331601C -1505589 -2923609 +2820027C -0650743 -2040859 +2179207C -2068859 +0861572 -2141517C -4040328 -0853404 -1283169C -4290309 -0055066 -2358932C -3283636 +0851846 -2802383H +1577268 +1225071 +2545431H +3709675 +0656950 +3638097H +5102354 -1207908 +2780032H +4370203 -2481610 +0816493H +3657459 -3470244 -0904562H +2646995 -4514070 -2895635H +0428813 -3680309 -3725364H -0653838 -1792135 -2488922H +1972502 +0344116 -2435775H +3110105 +2224830 -3615283H +2688338 +4561082 -2798111H +1199796 +4905837 -0862062H -0099436 +5018424 +0796468H -1583963 +4996278 +2748917H -2464190 +2841866 +3611120H -1844221 +0720552 +2528293H -4303434 -2571460 +0895999H -3494721 -3783946 +2843450H -1178132 -3479155 +3692057H +0355743 -1901962 +2558538H -1274098 +1534463 -2447892H -4799806 -1539416 -0927834H -5246378 -0099232 -2869057H -3455339 +1526279 -3632144

42

61Ir(ppy)3 XP S0T1 (TD-B3LYPRe-TZPCN-DZPH-DZ)Ir -0055534 +0191782 +0116633N +0757587 -1850103 -1074310N -1331813 -0121677 -1373523C -0680124 +1761613 +1158030C +1868610 -0242906 +0638232C +1850271 -2383882 -0521883C +2490286 -1483497 +0442675N +0924180 +1838634 -0964279C -1078281 -1257257 +1081808C +0660889 +3053130 -0448961C -0212558 +3030587 +0731805C -2499214 -0869105 -0864995C -2223105 -1630843 +0362633C +2477685 +0716065 +1448379C +3645685 +0401144 +2135883C +4233541 -0846405 +1984215C +3661638 -1779208 +1129972C +2297515 -3649618 -0890029C +1572716 -4360790 -1836101C +0434810 -3791854 -2391673C +0057874 -2520951 -1978999C +1734963 +1696203 -2010662C +2321739 +2785381 -2628285C +2046609 +4052320 -2131241C +1213168 +4190202 -1032826C -0573172 +4169825 +1437806C -1399713 +4067009 +2553790C -1874214 +2829042 +2966213C -1518487 +1678403 +2271791C -2975984 -2700064 +0838914C -2618552 -3349899 +2020017C -1494714 -2957657 +2734551C -0718635 -1902122 +2250936C -1686554 +0962814 -2254509C -3672204 -0822385 -1532790C -3878069 -0001995 -2679801C -2868473 +0987275 -2899244H +2048486 +1700781 +1578946H +4101702 +1147610 +2777926H +5146178 -1088832 +2515163H +4135302 -2745494 +1004356H +3190012 -4076425 -0450254H +1896132 -5353066 -2135524H -0159960 -4320710 -3127912H -0813593 -2003569 -2363151H +1891689 +0680844 -2353260H +2972608 +2642326 -3483177H +2479550 +4930790 -2597969H +0993312 +5173291 -0638575H -0223294 +5149283 +1133063H -1679373 +4964219 +3095887H -2528780 +2758304 +3828897H -1900767 +0715702 +2583563H -3840919 -3050386 +0284322H -3222006 -4181470 +2372377H -1213690 -3474098 +3646728H +0177858 -1604821 +2786918H -0936426 +1707703 -2415169H -4492743 -1419508 -1140604H -4863302 +0111122 -3108628H -3045736 +1791947 -3600586

61Ir(ppy)3 MXP S0T1 (TD-B3LYPRe-TZPCN-DZPH-DZ)Ir -0145947 +0564575 +0165466N +0928223 -1840875 -1821194N -1379993 -0054515 -1363300C -0703964 +2033977 +1429061C +1775002 -0104439 +0479767C +1357097 -2303459 -0637632C +2216679 -1397153 +0156122N +0758100 +2281079 -0761781C -0958832 -1053760 +1020019C +0584478 +3450487 -0098610C -0242497 +3338122 +1099763C -2189938 -1131937 -1061889C -1924712 -1727309 +0231418C +2648999 +0744692 +1168211C +3906609 +0308157 +1569764C +4323747 -0983869 +1273856C +3478731 -1827510 +0565295C +0986315 -3552453 -0142460C +0127943 -4342345 -0888515C -0324830 -3865330 -2111112C +0107356 -2615429 -2530859C +1573466 +2211135 -1819179C +2228002 +3322587 -2313692C +2038077 +4542809 -1670801C +1219808 +4605862 -0557134C -0554920 +4421447 +1923132C -1330098 +4235709 +3057051C -1796539 +2961454 +3383933C -1487250 +1874535 +2580847C -2504756 -2919165 +0679016C -2131648 -3458127 +1896548C -1173980 -2807693 +2679905C -0598580 -1623622 +2245993C -1498001 +0547419 -2569832C -3134796 -1558749 -1988994C -3250790 -0940548 -3219790C -2402824 +0134867 -3514567H +2340341 +1753850 +1421571H +4561763 +0983233 +2112732H +5307214 -1327963 +1577883H +3808898 -2827474 +0297933H +1323599 -3864617 +0838491H -0201676 -5304160 -0509956H -1008943 -4442307 -2724203H -0236166 -2202634 -3476319H +1703021 +1222293 -2246304H +2884976 +3229584 -3170623H +2540339 +5435972 -2027730H +1085503 +5544685 -0035041H -0199424 +5418738 +1686248H -1574939 +5083377 +3688714H -2408310 +2822756 +4270731H -1858962 +0889700 +2839514H -3235434 -3441733 +0070518H -2579276 -4385069 +2240170H -0877233 -3237556 +3632479H +0161027 -1140609 +2853195H -0835291 +1382830 -2747956H -3780420 -2390490 -1736408H -3987579 -1278432 -3939285H -2454155 +0650149 -4466669

43

28Re(CO)3(Cl)(bipy) S0 min (Harabuchi2016JCTC)C -3275103 -0044247 +1502075C -3196555 -0052099 +2892632C -2100549 -0066125 +0740179H -4106718 -0034369 +3493527C -1939620 -0083561 +3496676N -0878233 -0094186 +1337309H -1823889 -0091815 +4580356C -0810560 -0103192 +2683419H +0188925 -0125931 +3115734H -4248407 -0020601 +1016325C -2100549 -0066125 -0740179N -0878233 -0094186 -1337309C -3275103 -0044247 -1502075C -0810560 -0103192 -2683419C -3196555 -0052099 -2892632C -1939620 -0083561 -3496676H -4248407 -0020601 -1016325H +0188925 -0125931 -3115734H -4106718 -0034369 -3493527H -1823889 -0091815 -4580356Re +0894823 -0052419 +0000000C +2265517 +0103478 +1361644C +1070050 -1967897 +0000000C +2265517 +0103478 -1361644Cl +0509433 +2478712 +0000000O +1176732 -3127265 +0000000O +3066717 +0208112 +2195548O +3066717 +0208112 -2195548

44Ir(CO)(Cl)(ppy)2 S0 min (Brahim2014CTC)C +0263266 -1632625 +2665885C +0723630 -2043724 +3917764C +1779326 -1374338 +4550821C +2374717 -0288470 +3922698C +1913866 +0131515 +2660906C +0844071 -0537695 +2013079C +2477168 +1266785 +1937072N +1897397 +1520647 +0725439C +2326835 +2544498 -0034846C +3364088 +3376550 +0356442C +3976629 +3137455 +1590675C +3531594 +2084759 +2375781Ir +0320355 +0259705 +0206373C +1421556 -1058029 -0708865O +2032462 -1852827 -1274433C -0975454 +1651673 +1045719C -1597864 +2532878 +0123098C -2480957 +3535637 +0563179C -2767834 +3674956 +1915756C -2174117 +2805477 +2834992C -1292794 +1812508 +2401452C -1293905 +2332234 -1299595C -1882354 +3043758 -2359608C -1537281 +2756067 -3672401C -0604082 +1748249 -3928887C -0056978 +1075581 -2845330N -0377571 +1361933 -1571410Cl -1593377 -1196652 -0190960H +1808999 +2679522 -0976566H +3677314 +4189216 -0289639H +3992756 +1885902 +3336007H +4791542 +3768090 +1934161H +3193454 +0228844 +4416327H +0255975 -2894572 +4407875H +2132433 -1701353 +5524807H -0856061 +1143678 +3136255H -2951059 +4211943 -0145515H -2401900 +2899950 +3894334H -3451157 +4450630 +2250512H +0658281 +0273137 -2987369H -0313243 +1479897 -4938652H -2618753 +3809839 -2148707H -1997318 +3304541 -4489593H -0558505 -2157732 +2190307

73[Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 +1449479N -0992742 -1055937 +2959913C -0445075 -2255534 +3287288C +0727450 -2656787 +2490587C +1386578 -3871365 +2649228C +2481127 -4167513 +1852931C +2897074 -3239347 +0908338C +2203650 -2046997 +0797049N +1145261 -1751497 +1567751C -0980351 -3029886 +4311202C -2085802 -2573366 +5010534C -2637782 -1346085 +4670335C -2062678 -0619292 +3642772N +1006891 +0871571 -0174848C +1994402 +1768860 -0129160C +2566095 +2304708 -1279235C +2106682 +1903083 -2516324C +1069124 +0967669 -2588381C +0527817 +0483309 -3853931N +1033088 +0948199 -4981383C +0526491 +0484537 -6138533C -0526491 -0484537 -6138533N -1033088 -0948199 -4981383C -0527817 -0483309 -3853931C -1069124 -0967669 -2588381C -2106682 -1903083 -2516324C -2566095 -2304708 -1279235C -1994402 -1768860 -0129160N -1006891 -0871571 -0174848C -0539800 -0480275 -1390374C +0539800 +0480275 -1390374C -1036969 -0955264 -7374197C -0521594 -0481145 -8549357C +0521594 +0481145 -8549357C +1036969 +0955264 -7374197N +0992742 +1055937 +2959913C +2062678 +0619292 +3642772C +2637782 +1346085 +4670335C +2085802 +2573366 +5010534H +2506211 +3167587 +5808383C +0980351 +3029886 +4311202C +0445075 +2255534 +3287288C -0727450 +2656787 +2490587N -1145261 +1751497 +1567751C -2203650 +2046997 +0797049C -2897074 +3239347 +0908338C -2481127 +4167513 +1852931H -2998103 +5108434 +1969656C -1386578 +3871365 +2649228H +2998103 -5108434 +1969656H -2506211 -3167587 +5808383H -2461633 +0339491 +3347998H -3497574 -0949065 +5186817H +3742212 -3425827 +0264261H +2497190 -1298289 +0076926H +2461633 -0339491 +3347998H +3497574 +0949065 +5186817H -3742212 +3425827 +0264261H -2497190 +1298289 +0076926H +2337257 +2061239 +0852028H +3362890 +3025461 -1184942H +2533060 +2296448 -3425459H +1831717 +1687397 -7357098H +0908961 +0839228 -9492212H -0908961 -0839228 -9492212H -1831717 -1687397 -7357098H -2533060 -2296448 -3425459H -3362890 -3025461 -1184942H -2337257 -2061239 +0852028H +1048298 -4581822 +3384287H -0537432 -3978234 +4564316H -1048298 +4581822 +3384287H +0537432 +3978234 +4564316

44

77[Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 +1153207N -1031338 -1047808 +2649192C -0459450 -2248875 +2956082C +0707296 -2620931 +2224543C +1341410 -3850821 +2484940C +2485701 -4165133 +1727986C +2929791 -3273130 +0778125C +2244192 -2068550 +0582564N +1162331 -1740342 +1285729C +0796574 -4708061 +3495243C -0313184 -4352633 +4193480C -0978265 -3108682 +3942920C -2133506 -2688488 +4628767C -2699923 -1474391 +4312043C -2121881 -0677318 +3316952N +1041191 +0825410 -0462362C +2083002 +1661157 -0412379C +2699562 +2148879 -1561623C +2227863 +1766695 -2801952C +1133060 +0897451 -2877589C +0563217 +0444794 -4145018N +1104715 +0869872 -5273634C +0563594 +0442520 -6432045C -0563594 -0442520 -6432045N -1104715 -0869872 -5273634C -0563217 -0444794 -4145018C -1133060 -0897451 -2877589C -2227863 -1766695 -2801952C -2699562 -2148879 -1561623C -2083002 -1661157 -0412379N -1041191 -0825410 -0462362C -0565478 -0449272 -1680022C +0565478 +0449272 -1680022C -1111763 -0869723 -7668505C -0559539 -0437208 -8844227C +0559539 +0437208 -8844227C +1111763 +0869723 -7668505N +1031338 +1047808 +2649192C +2121881 +0677318 +3316952C +2699923 +1474391 +4312043C +2133506 +2688488 +4628767H +2563877 +3320886 +5394200C +0978265 +3108682 +3942920C +0459450 +2248875 +2956082C -0707296 +2620931 +2224543N -1162331 +1740342 +1285729C -2244192 +2068550 +0582564C -2929791 +3273130 +0778125C -2485701 +4165133 +1727986H -3001873 +5100898 +1898163C -1341410 +3850821 +2484940C -0796574 +4708061 +3495243C +0313184 +4352633 +4193480H +3001873 -5100898 +1898163H -2563877 -3320886 +5394200H -2550518 +0278490 +3052723H -3587197 -1119833 +4816894H -0717956 -5007062 +4954685H +1290989 -5650894 +3690280H +3803419 -3481883 +0177221H +2578921 -1353473 -0154691H +2550518 -0278490 +3052723H +3587197 +1119833 +4816894H +0717956 +5007062 +4954685H -1290989 +5650894 +3690280H -3803419 +3481883 +0177221H -2578921 +1353473 -0154691H +2430679 +1941183 +0570879H +3540925 +2819938 -1465123H +2686992 +2126740 -3710875H +1964057 +1536925 -7651679H +0975769 +0762037 -9789185H -0975769 -0762037 -9789185H -1964057 -1536925 -7651679H -2686992 -2126740 -3710875H -3540925 -2819938 -1465123H -2430679 -1941183 +0570879

73[Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 -1158577N +1162983 -1734480 -1265064C +0689890 -2629635 -2176146C -0465272 -2269047 -2912355N -1031573 -1058556 -2647624C -2109435 -0737499 -3350222C -2630726 -1622276 -4315096N -2100512 -2801593 -4579794C -0997323 -3145608 -3873239C -0351786 -4407422 -4081553C +0753130 -4756144 -3369636C +1310594 -3871908 -2390238N +2412045 -4219967 -1683019C +2853229 -3341100 -0802498C +2239581 -2092991 -0578877H -2576239 +0216879 -3158425H -3512946 -1329181 -4869450H -0772548 -5073014 -4823123H +1240821 -5708943 -3525241H +3732157 -3601276 -0226859H +2631836 -1400843 +0150716N -1162983 +1734480 -1265064C -0689890 +2629635 -2176146C +0465272 +2269047 -2912355N +1031573 +1058556 -2647624C +2109435 +0737499 -3350222C +2630726 +1622276 -4315096N +2100512 +2801593 -4579794C +0997323 +3145608 -3873239C +0351786 +4407422 -4081553C -0753130 +4756144 -3369636C -1310594 +3871908 -2390238N -2412045 +4219967 -1683019C -2853229 +3341100 -0802498C -2239581 +2092991 -0578877H +2576239 -0216879 -3158425H +3512946 +1329181 -4869450H +0772548 +5073014 -4823123H -1240821 +5708943 -3525241H -3732157 +3601276 -0226859H -2631836 +1400843 +0150716N -1055470 -0810407 +0459583C -0572365 -0440016 +1675577C +0572365 +0440016 +1675577N +1055470 +0810407 +0459583C +2112156 +1625885 +0407501C +2737420 +2101291 +1557305C +2257332 +1727751 +2796205C +1147258 +0877836 +2872673C +0570228 +0435012 +4140040C -0570228 -0435012 +4140040C -1147258 -0877836 +2872673C -2257332 -1727751 +2796205C -2737420 -2101291 +1557305C -2112156 -1625885 +0407501N +1118484 +0852421 +5268068C +0570894 +0433580 +6426040C +1124571 +0853645 +7662534C +0565830 +0429186 +8837852C -0565830 -0429186 +8837852C -1124571 -0853645 +7662534C -0570894 -0433580 +6426040N -1118484 -0852421 +5268068H +2467692 +1899436 -0574400H +3592219 +2754809 +1460913H +2722567 +2079141 +3705410H +1986375 +1508481 +7645916H +0986545 +0747821 +9782939H -0986545 -0747821 +9782939H -1986375 -1508481 +7645916H -2722567 -2079141 +3705410H -3592219 -2754809 +1460913H -2467692 -1899436 -0574400

45

49[Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Re -0037760 -0172581 +0000000N -0314508 +1557127 +1333112N -0314508 +1557127 -1333112C -1907856 -0659416 +0000000C +0341701 -1495220 -1352453C +0341701 -1495220 +1352453C -0396602 +1517080 +2663900C -0358827 +2666020 +3446023C -0220325 +3894692 +2835086C -0155383 +3960603 +1438957C -0224326 +2763420 +0722029C -0224326 +2763420 -0722029C -0155383 +3960603 -1438957C -0220325 +3894692 -2835086C -0358827 +2666020 -3446023C -0396602 +1517080 -2663900C -0010350 +5218975 +0714943C -0010350 +5218975 -0714943O -3029255 -0935997 +0000000O +0578972 -2265930 -2181036O +0578972 -2265930 +2181036H -0479351 +0539285 +3109806H -0424617 +2577492 +4518405H -0424617 +2577492 -4518405H -0479351 +0539285 -3109806H -0166316 +4803703 +3412838H -0166316 +4803703 -3412838N +0128994 +6337138 +1403250N +0128994 +6337138 -1403250C +0278319 +7483599 -0716852C +0278319 +7483599 +0716852C +0445140 +8707766 -1411275H +0444805 +8690836 -2491751C +0445140 +8707766 +1411275H +0444805 +8690836 +2491751C +0604950 +9871211 -0709972H +0734907 +10805655 -1236594C +0604950 +9871211 +0709972H +0734907 +10805655 +1236594C +2696074 +0904680 +1152995C +3935047 +1518525 +1193811C +4567569 +1841454 +0000000H +5531840 +2328977 +0000000C +3935047 +1518525 -1193811H +4386297 +1738648 -2149061N +2067935 +0608063 +0000000C +2696074 +0904680 -1152995H +2180709 +0646260 -2064653H +4386297 +1738648 +2149061H +2180709 +0646260 +2064653

38[Mn(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Mn -0462641 +0871149 +0224406N +1032095 +0168187 +1521057N +0802574 +0210318 -1296362N -1002827 -1137193 +0115222N +2993137 -0287769 +2384035C +2337150 +0366533 +1408314C -1738897 +1346945 -0984395C -1561503 +1266749 +1620727C +0215787 +2559161 +0274183C +1672748 +0912303 -2015349C +2532013 +0321489 -2951058C +2484719 -1038934 -3151352C +1564967 -1809811 -2416050C +0739136 -1132201 -1498199C -0226393 -1855415 -0738085C -0349226 -3249123 -0898282C -1327260 -3905777 -0127931C -2116028 -3168942 +0725202C -1926241 -1784057 +0818234C +1428653 -3229054 -2554389C +0512925 -3918908 -1826026C +2070487 -0940823 +3166428C +0853881 -0649365 +2623097O -2542254 +1637373 -1754394O -2256798 +1518994 +2502283O +0652345 +3623094 +0311633H +1701827 +1978439 -1842996H +3222327 +0947471 -3498149H -2879838 -3635584 +1330589H -2536316 -1192121 +1484891H +2073350 -3741322 -3256858H +0414471 -4990953 -1937411H +3141268 -1520786 -3864136H -1450487 -4977328 -0215314H +3994011 -0296089 +2509353H -0120792 -0973916 +2939776H +2825164 +0954526 +0652517H +2353195 -1539690 +4013220

46

38[Tc(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Tc -0504419 +0943061 +0234166N +1083560 +0154720 +1579801N +0826069 +0173721 -1353140N -1015243 -1200783 +0087748N +3049417 -0390967 +2375187C +2391837 +0322219 +1443840C -1873475 +1480409 -1035591C -1680503 +1363905 +1720420C +0214436 +2745530 +0280723C +1706272 +0862469 -2074220C +2574361 +0255279 -2988929C +2526356 -1108291 -3160208C +1599940 -1865849 -2419421C +0758442 -1176405 -1522106C -0210013 -1902512 -0757518C -0306620 -3301951 -0900819C -1274801 -3972735 -0130341C -2085723 -3250323 +0713069C -1927354 -1862165 +0793779C +1482435 -3287446 -2540211C +0569818 -3976667 -1809860C +2127013 -1052594 +3150384C +0906737 -0706002 +2650246O -2683800 +1787640 -1795683O -2385084 +1588355 +2605706O +0670184 +3805015 +0297671H +1731334 +1931761 -1922021H +3269949 +0869587 -3542277H -2841430 -3730098 +1318181H -2553912 -1276930 +1451152H +2140017 -3800678 -3229811H +0484408 -5051428 -1903805H +3188740 -1606081 -3856424H -1371662 -5047534 -0211074H +4052106 -0430539 +2478352H -0069062 -1016679 +2977964H +2880599 +0929112 +0703190H +2412735 -1692893 +3965231

38[Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Re -0506387 +0945561 +0234076N +1079472 +0145452 +1563853N +0827178 +0166913 -1343083N -1004040 -1199665 +0089193N +3043709 -0394781 +2360887C +2389012 +0316952 +1429217C -1870502 +1487578 -1021487C -1673956 +1368340 +1711148C +0202020 +2739241 +0279311C +1705973 +0861594 -2063586C +2573862 +0257139 -2978911C +2531259 -1106830 -3153076C +1607459 -1869331 -2414337C +0765507 -1183923 -1516787C -0201687 -1908345 -0754692C -0302877 -3305933 -0897471C -1275852 -3970960 -0128166C -2085771 -3243021 +0712346C -1922137 -1856466 +0795163C +1489077 -3291074 -2535055C +0574681 -3980251 -1806031C +2121667 -1057774 +3135889C +0901452 -0716211 +2634818O -2687028 +1801263 -1780745O -2380684 +1594721 +2601541O +0657251 +3805167 +0293658H +1724983 +1929791 -1906323H +3267444 +0874551 -3531043H -2845025 -3718920 +1315836H -2544361 -1265087 +1450382H +2147055 -3804762 -3223814H +0488990 -5054833 -1900913H +3196140 -1600125 -3849971H -1377901 -5045326 -0207013H +4046379 -0432359 +2465782H -0075648 -1025659 +2958531H +2873471 +0926337 +0688377H +2407868 -1696657 +3951475

47

61Ir(ppy)3 S0 min (Plasser2015JPCA)Ir +0000000 +0000000 -0004130N +0872090 -1626490 -1091240N -1844620 +0057990 -1091240C -0595800 +1616650 +1037790C +1697960 -0292350 +1037790C +2058050 -2056070 -0602390C +2539790 -1326530 +0561610N +0972530 +1568500 -1091240C -1102160 -1324300 +1037790C +0751580 +2810360 -0602390C -0121090 +2862790 +0561610C -2809630 -0754290 -0602390C -2418710 -1536260 +0561610C +2146600 +0405050 +2166320C +3346570 +0098370 +2786510C +4158150 -0923160 +2301150C +3750830 -1632120 +1189840C +2713190 -3127730 -1213780C +2153700 -3748950 -2309560C +0932340 -3297200 -2792440C +0331210 -2237130 -2147150C +1771800 +1405400 -2147150C +2389290 +2456030 -2792440C +2169830 +3739640 -2309560C +1352100 +3913560 -1213780C -0461960 +4064380 +1189840C -1279590 +4062650 +2301150C -1758480 +2849030 +2786510C -1424090 +1656490 +2166320C -3288880 -2432250 +1189840C -2878560 -3139490 +2301150C -1588090 -2947400 +2786510C -0722520 -2061540 +2166320C -2103010 +0831730 -2147150C -4065290 -0785830 -1213780C -4323540 +0009310 -2309560C -3321630 +0841170 -2792440H +1534880 +1202570 +2572330H +3656510 +0660800 +3661810H +5096180 -1161210 +2788940H +4382550 -2429350 +0812910H +3659240 -3471620 -0818000H +2660480 -4582420 -2782450H +0449130 -3757680 -3644210H -0626110 -1850990 -2476620H +1916060 +0383270 -2476620H +3029680 +2267800 -3644210H +2638260 +4595250 -2782450H +1176890 +4904810 -0818000H -0087390 +5010080 +0812910H -1542450 +4994020 +2788940H -2400520 +2836230 +3661810H -1808890 +0727960 +2572330H -4295160 -2580720 +0812910H -3553720 -3832810 +2788940H -1255990 -3497030 +3661810H +0274020 -1930530 +2572330H -1289950 +1467720 -2476620H -4836130 -1433190 -0818000H -5298730 -0012830 -2782450H -3478810 +1489880 -3644210

61Ir(ppy)3 T1 min (U-B3LYPRe-TZPCN-DZPH-DZ)Ir -0001360 -0002890 +0016651N +0864530 -1621537 -1116951N -1788054 +0063817 -1115843C -0604282 +1628727 +1028030C +1722602 -0301155 +1041560C +2053296 -2059729 -0628370C +2540486 -1349606 +0552649N +1001527 +1563058 -1094178C -1058610 -1303569 +1065250C +0770279 +2810317 -0613998C -0115685 +2867829 +0544268C -2786454 -0797736 -0607181C -2428702 -1506881 +0545899C +2180215 +0413185 +2152090C +3380598 +0092059 +2770284C +4167664 -0955174 +2290481C +3749540 -1670477 +1182289C +2707307 -3111466 -1277981C +2139546 -3696411 -2393704C +0911229 -3236000 -2862690C +0306496 -2194426 -2187444C +1824195 +1372887 -2129337C +2450659 +2418708 -2777455C +2214890 +3711528 -2316879C +1378613 +3905768 -1234366C -0472851 +4069790 +1166855C -1310829 +4063452 +2267073C -1803751 +2850110 +2748547C -1457765 +1654933 +2136044C -3285956 -2414430 +1234828C -2828995 -3094713 +2331601C -1505589 -2923609 +2820027C -0650743 -2040859 +2179207C -2068859 +0861572 -2141517C -4040328 -0853404 -1283169C -4290309 -0055066 -2358932C -3283636 +0851846 -2802383H +1577268 +1225071 +2545431H +3709675 +0656950 +3638097H +5102354 -1207908 +2780032H +4370203 -2481610 +0816493H +3657459 -3470244 -0904562H +2646995 -4514070 -2895635H +0428813 -3680309 -3725364H -0653838 -1792135 -2488922H +1972502 +0344116 -2435775H +3110105 +2224830 -3615283H +2688338 +4561082 -2798111H +1199796 +4905837 -0862062H -0099436 +5018424 +0796468H -1583963 +4996278 +2748917H -2464190 +2841866 +3611120H -1844221 +0720552 +2528293H -4303434 -2571460 +0895999H -3494721 -3783946 +2843450H -1178132 -3479155 +3692057H +0355743 -1901962 +2558538H -1274098 +1534463 -2447892H -4799806 -1539416 -0927834H -5246378 -0099232 -2869057H -3455339 +1526279 -3632144

42

61Ir(ppy)3 XP S0T1 (TD-B3LYPRe-TZPCN-DZPH-DZ)Ir -0055534 +0191782 +0116633N +0757587 -1850103 -1074310N -1331813 -0121677 -1373523C -0680124 +1761613 +1158030C +1868610 -0242906 +0638232C +1850271 -2383882 -0521883C +2490286 -1483497 +0442675N +0924180 +1838634 -0964279C -1078281 -1257257 +1081808C +0660889 +3053130 -0448961C -0212558 +3030587 +0731805C -2499214 -0869105 -0864995C -2223105 -1630843 +0362633C +2477685 +0716065 +1448379C +3645685 +0401144 +2135883C +4233541 -0846405 +1984215C +3661638 -1779208 +1129972C +2297515 -3649618 -0890029C +1572716 -4360790 -1836101C +0434810 -3791854 -2391673C +0057874 -2520951 -1978999C +1734963 +1696203 -2010662C +2321739 +2785381 -2628285C +2046609 +4052320 -2131241C +1213168 +4190202 -1032826C -0573172 +4169825 +1437806C -1399713 +4067009 +2553790C -1874214 +2829042 +2966213C -1518487 +1678403 +2271791C -2975984 -2700064 +0838914C -2618552 -3349899 +2020017C -1494714 -2957657 +2734551C -0718635 -1902122 +2250936C -1686554 +0962814 -2254509C -3672204 -0822385 -1532790C -3878069 -0001995 -2679801C -2868473 +0987275 -2899244H +2048486 +1700781 +1578946H +4101702 +1147610 +2777926H +5146178 -1088832 +2515163H +4135302 -2745494 +1004356H +3190012 -4076425 -0450254H +1896132 -5353066 -2135524H -0159960 -4320710 -3127912H -0813593 -2003569 -2363151H +1891689 +0680844 -2353260H +2972608 +2642326 -3483177H +2479550 +4930790 -2597969H +0993312 +5173291 -0638575H -0223294 +5149283 +1133063H -1679373 +4964219 +3095887H -2528780 +2758304 +3828897H -1900767 +0715702 +2583563H -3840919 -3050386 +0284322H -3222006 -4181470 +2372377H -1213690 -3474098 +3646728H +0177858 -1604821 +2786918H -0936426 +1707703 -2415169H -4492743 -1419508 -1140604H -4863302 +0111122 -3108628H -3045736 +1791947 -3600586

61Ir(ppy)3 MXP S0T1 (TD-B3LYPRe-TZPCN-DZPH-DZ)Ir -0145947 +0564575 +0165466N +0928223 -1840875 -1821194N -1379993 -0054515 -1363300C -0703964 +2033977 +1429061C +1775002 -0104439 +0479767C +1357097 -2303459 -0637632C +2216679 -1397153 +0156122N +0758100 +2281079 -0761781C -0958832 -1053760 +1020019C +0584478 +3450487 -0098610C -0242497 +3338122 +1099763C -2189938 -1131937 -1061889C -1924712 -1727309 +0231418C +2648999 +0744692 +1168211C +3906609 +0308157 +1569764C +4323747 -0983869 +1273856C +3478731 -1827510 +0565295C +0986315 -3552453 -0142460C +0127943 -4342345 -0888515C -0324830 -3865330 -2111112C +0107356 -2615429 -2530859C +1573466 +2211135 -1819179C +2228002 +3322587 -2313692C +2038077 +4542809 -1670801C +1219808 +4605862 -0557134C -0554920 +4421447 +1923132C -1330098 +4235709 +3057051C -1796539 +2961454 +3383933C -1487250 +1874535 +2580847C -2504756 -2919165 +0679016C -2131648 -3458127 +1896548C -1173980 -2807693 +2679905C -0598580 -1623622 +2245993C -1498001 +0547419 -2569832C -3134796 -1558749 -1988994C -3250790 -0940548 -3219790C -2402824 +0134867 -3514567H +2340341 +1753850 +1421571H +4561763 +0983233 +2112732H +5307214 -1327963 +1577883H +3808898 -2827474 +0297933H +1323599 -3864617 +0838491H -0201676 -5304160 -0509956H -1008943 -4442307 -2724203H -0236166 -2202634 -3476319H +1703021 +1222293 -2246304H +2884976 +3229584 -3170623H +2540339 +5435972 -2027730H +1085503 +5544685 -0035041H -0199424 +5418738 +1686248H -1574939 +5083377 +3688714H -2408310 +2822756 +4270731H -1858962 +0889700 +2839514H -3235434 -3441733 +0070518H -2579276 -4385069 +2240170H -0877233 -3237556 +3632479H +0161027 -1140609 +2853195H -0835291 +1382830 -2747956H -3780420 -2390490 -1736408H -3987579 -1278432 -3939285H -2454155 +0650149 -4466669

43

28Re(CO)3(Cl)(bipy) S0 min (Harabuchi2016JCTC)C -3275103 -0044247 +1502075C -3196555 -0052099 +2892632C -2100549 -0066125 +0740179H -4106718 -0034369 +3493527C -1939620 -0083561 +3496676N -0878233 -0094186 +1337309H -1823889 -0091815 +4580356C -0810560 -0103192 +2683419H +0188925 -0125931 +3115734H -4248407 -0020601 +1016325C -2100549 -0066125 -0740179N -0878233 -0094186 -1337309C -3275103 -0044247 -1502075C -0810560 -0103192 -2683419C -3196555 -0052099 -2892632C -1939620 -0083561 -3496676H -4248407 -0020601 -1016325H +0188925 -0125931 -3115734H -4106718 -0034369 -3493527H -1823889 -0091815 -4580356Re +0894823 -0052419 +0000000C +2265517 +0103478 +1361644C +1070050 -1967897 +0000000C +2265517 +0103478 -1361644Cl +0509433 +2478712 +0000000O +1176732 -3127265 +0000000O +3066717 +0208112 +2195548O +3066717 +0208112 -2195548

44Ir(CO)(Cl)(ppy)2 S0 min (Brahim2014CTC)C +0263266 -1632625 +2665885C +0723630 -2043724 +3917764C +1779326 -1374338 +4550821C +2374717 -0288470 +3922698C +1913866 +0131515 +2660906C +0844071 -0537695 +2013079C +2477168 +1266785 +1937072N +1897397 +1520647 +0725439C +2326835 +2544498 -0034846C +3364088 +3376550 +0356442C +3976629 +3137455 +1590675C +3531594 +2084759 +2375781Ir +0320355 +0259705 +0206373C +1421556 -1058029 -0708865O +2032462 -1852827 -1274433C -0975454 +1651673 +1045719C -1597864 +2532878 +0123098C -2480957 +3535637 +0563179C -2767834 +3674956 +1915756C -2174117 +2805477 +2834992C -1292794 +1812508 +2401452C -1293905 +2332234 -1299595C -1882354 +3043758 -2359608C -1537281 +2756067 -3672401C -0604082 +1748249 -3928887C -0056978 +1075581 -2845330N -0377571 +1361933 -1571410Cl -1593377 -1196652 -0190960H +1808999 +2679522 -0976566H +3677314 +4189216 -0289639H +3992756 +1885902 +3336007H +4791542 +3768090 +1934161H +3193454 +0228844 +4416327H +0255975 -2894572 +4407875H +2132433 -1701353 +5524807H -0856061 +1143678 +3136255H -2951059 +4211943 -0145515H -2401900 +2899950 +3894334H -3451157 +4450630 +2250512H +0658281 +0273137 -2987369H -0313243 +1479897 -4938652H -2618753 +3809839 -2148707H -1997318 +3304541 -4489593H -0558505 -2157732 +2190307

73[Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 +1449479N -0992742 -1055937 +2959913C -0445075 -2255534 +3287288C +0727450 -2656787 +2490587C +1386578 -3871365 +2649228C +2481127 -4167513 +1852931C +2897074 -3239347 +0908338C +2203650 -2046997 +0797049N +1145261 -1751497 +1567751C -0980351 -3029886 +4311202C -2085802 -2573366 +5010534C -2637782 -1346085 +4670335C -2062678 -0619292 +3642772N +1006891 +0871571 -0174848C +1994402 +1768860 -0129160C +2566095 +2304708 -1279235C +2106682 +1903083 -2516324C +1069124 +0967669 -2588381C +0527817 +0483309 -3853931N +1033088 +0948199 -4981383C +0526491 +0484537 -6138533C -0526491 -0484537 -6138533N -1033088 -0948199 -4981383C -0527817 -0483309 -3853931C -1069124 -0967669 -2588381C -2106682 -1903083 -2516324C -2566095 -2304708 -1279235C -1994402 -1768860 -0129160N -1006891 -0871571 -0174848C -0539800 -0480275 -1390374C +0539800 +0480275 -1390374C -1036969 -0955264 -7374197C -0521594 -0481145 -8549357C +0521594 +0481145 -8549357C +1036969 +0955264 -7374197N +0992742 +1055937 +2959913C +2062678 +0619292 +3642772C +2637782 +1346085 +4670335C +2085802 +2573366 +5010534H +2506211 +3167587 +5808383C +0980351 +3029886 +4311202C +0445075 +2255534 +3287288C -0727450 +2656787 +2490587N -1145261 +1751497 +1567751C -2203650 +2046997 +0797049C -2897074 +3239347 +0908338C -2481127 +4167513 +1852931H -2998103 +5108434 +1969656C -1386578 +3871365 +2649228H +2998103 -5108434 +1969656H -2506211 -3167587 +5808383H -2461633 +0339491 +3347998H -3497574 -0949065 +5186817H +3742212 -3425827 +0264261H +2497190 -1298289 +0076926H +2461633 -0339491 +3347998H +3497574 +0949065 +5186817H -3742212 +3425827 +0264261H -2497190 +1298289 +0076926H +2337257 +2061239 +0852028H +3362890 +3025461 -1184942H +2533060 +2296448 -3425459H +1831717 +1687397 -7357098H +0908961 +0839228 -9492212H -0908961 -0839228 -9492212H -1831717 -1687397 -7357098H -2533060 -2296448 -3425459H -3362890 -3025461 -1184942H -2337257 -2061239 +0852028H +1048298 -4581822 +3384287H -0537432 -3978234 +4564316H -1048298 +4581822 +3384287H +0537432 +3978234 +4564316

44

77[Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 +1153207N -1031338 -1047808 +2649192C -0459450 -2248875 +2956082C +0707296 -2620931 +2224543C +1341410 -3850821 +2484940C +2485701 -4165133 +1727986C +2929791 -3273130 +0778125C +2244192 -2068550 +0582564N +1162331 -1740342 +1285729C +0796574 -4708061 +3495243C -0313184 -4352633 +4193480C -0978265 -3108682 +3942920C -2133506 -2688488 +4628767C -2699923 -1474391 +4312043C -2121881 -0677318 +3316952N +1041191 +0825410 -0462362C +2083002 +1661157 -0412379C +2699562 +2148879 -1561623C +2227863 +1766695 -2801952C +1133060 +0897451 -2877589C +0563217 +0444794 -4145018N +1104715 +0869872 -5273634C +0563594 +0442520 -6432045C -0563594 -0442520 -6432045N -1104715 -0869872 -5273634C -0563217 -0444794 -4145018C -1133060 -0897451 -2877589C -2227863 -1766695 -2801952C -2699562 -2148879 -1561623C -2083002 -1661157 -0412379N -1041191 -0825410 -0462362C -0565478 -0449272 -1680022C +0565478 +0449272 -1680022C -1111763 -0869723 -7668505C -0559539 -0437208 -8844227C +0559539 +0437208 -8844227C +1111763 +0869723 -7668505N +1031338 +1047808 +2649192C +2121881 +0677318 +3316952C +2699923 +1474391 +4312043C +2133506 +2688488 +4628767H +2563877 +3320886 +5394200C +0978265 +3108682 +3942920C +0459450 +2248875 +2956082C -0707296 +2620931 +2224543N -1162331 +1740342 +1285729C -2244192 +2068550 +0582564C -2929791 +3273130 +0778125C -2485701 +4165133 +1727986H -3001873 +5100898 +1898163C -1341410 +3850821 +2484940C -0796574 +4708061 +3495243C +0313184 +4352633 +4193480H +3001873 -5100898 +1898163H -2563877 -3320886 +5394200H -2550518 +0278490 +3052723H -3587197 -1119833 +4816894H -0717956 -5007062 +4954685H +1290989 -5650894 +3690280H +3803419 -3481883 +0177221H +2578921 -1353473 -0154691H +2550518 -0278490 +3052723H +3587197 +1119833 +4816894H +0717956 +5007062 +4954685H -1290989 +5650894 +3690280H -3803419 +3481883 +0177221H -2578921 +1353473 -0154691H +2430679 +1941183 +0570879H +3540925 +2819938 -1465123H +2686992 +2126740 -3710875H +1964057 +1536925 -7651679H +0975769 +0762037 -9789185H -0975769 -0762037 -9789185H -1964057 -1536925 -7651679H -2686992 -2126740 -3710875H -3540925 -2819938 -1465123H -2430679 -1941183 +0570879

73[Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 -1158577N +1162983 -1734480 -1265064C +0689890 -2629635 -2176146C -0465272 -2269047 -2912355N -1031573 -1058556 -2647624C -2109435 -0737499 -3350222C -2630726 -1622276 -4315096N -2100512 -2801593 -4579794C -0997323 -3145608 -3873239C -0351786 -4407422 -4081553C +0753130 -4756144 -3369636C +1310594 -3871908 -2390238N +2412045 -4219967 -1683019C +2853229 -3341100 -0802498C +2239581 -2092991 -0578877H -2576239 +0216879 -3158425H -3512946 -1329181 -4869450H -0772548 -5073014 -4823123H +1240821 -5708943 -3525241H +3732157 -3601276 -0226859H +2631836 -1400843 +0150716N -1162983 +1734480 -1265064C -0689890 +2629635 -2176146C +0465272 +2269047 -2912355N +1031573 +1058556 -2647624C +2109435 +0737499 -3350222C +2630726 +1622276 -4315096N +2100512 +2801593 -4579794C +0997323 +3145608 -3873239C +0351786 +4407422 -4081553C -0753130 +4756144 -3369636C -1310594 +3871908 -2390238N -2412045 +4219967 -1683019C -2853229 +3341100 -0802498C -2239581 +2092991 -0578877H +2576239 -0216879 -3158425H +3512946 +1329181 -4869450H +0772548 +5073014 -4823123H -1240821 +5708943 -3525241H -3732157 +3601276 -0226859H -2631836 +1400843 +0150716N -1055470 -0810407 +0459583C -0572365 -0440016 +1675577C +0572365 +0440016 +1675577N +1055470 +0810407 +0459583C +2112156 +1625885 +0407501C +2737420 +2101291 +1557305C +2257332 +1727751 +2796205C +1147258 +0877836 +2872673C +0570228 +0435012 +4140040C -0570228 -0435012 +4140040C -1147258 -0877836 +2872673C -2257332 -1727751 +2796205C -2737420 -2101291 +1557305C -2112156 -1625885 +0407501N +1118484 +0852421 +5268068C +0570894 +0433580 +6426040C +1124571 +0853645 +7662534C +0565830 +0429186 +8837852C -0565830 -0429186 +8837852C -1124571 -0853645 +7662534C -0570894 -0433580 +6426040N -1118484 -0852421 +5268068H +2467692 +1899436 -0574400H +3592219 +2754809 +1460913H +2722567 +2079141 +3705410H +1986375 +1508481 +7645916H +0986545 +0747821 +9782939H -0986545 -0747821 +9782939H -1986375 -1508481 +7645916H -2722567 -2079141 +3705410H -3592219 -2754809 +1460913H -2467692 -1899436 -0574400

45

49[Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Re -0037760 -0172581 +0000000N -0314508 +1557127 +1333112N -0314508 +1557127 -1333112C -1907856 -0659416 +0000000C +0341701 -1495220 -1352453C +0341701 -1495220 +1352453C -0396602 +1517080 +2663900C -0358827 +2666020 +3446023C -0220325 +3894692 +2835086C -0155383 +3960603 +1438957C -0224326 +2763420 +0722029C -0224326 +2763420 -0722029C -0155383 +3960603 -1438957C -0220325 +3894692 -2835086C -0358827 +2666020 -3446023C -0396602 +1517080 -2663900C -0010350 +5218975 +0714943C -0010350 +5218975 -0714943O -3029255 -0935997 +0000000O +0578972 -2265930 -2181036O +0578972 -2265930 +2181036H -0479351 +0539285 +3109806H -0424617 +2577492 +4518405H -0424617 +2577492 -4518405H -0479351 +0539285 -3109806H -0166316 +4803703 +3412838H -0166316 +4803703 -3412838N +0128994 +6337138 +1403250N +0128994 +6337138 -1403250C +0278319 +7483599 -0716852C +0278319 +7483599 +0716852C +0445140 +8707766 -1411275H +0444805 +8690836 -2491751C +0445140 +8707766 +1411275H +0444805 +8690836 +2491751C +0604950 +9871211 -0709972H +0734907 +10805655 -1236594C +0604950 +9871211 +0709972H +0734907 +10805655 +1236594C +2696074 +0904680 +1152995C +3935047 +1518525 +1193811C +4567569 +1841454 +0000000H +5531840 +2328977 +0000000C +3935047 +1518525 -1193811H +4386297 +1738648 -2149061N +2067935 +0608063 +0000000C +2696074 +0904680 -1152995H +2180709 +0646260 -2064653H +4386297 +1738648 +2149061H +2180709 +0646260 +2064653

38[Mn(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Mn -0462641 +0871149 +0224406N +1032095 +0168187 +1521057N +0802574 +0210318 -1296362N -1002827 -1137193 +0115222N +2993137 -0287769 +2384035C +2337150 +0366533 +1408314C -1738897 +1346945 -0984395C -1561503 +1266749 +1620727C +0215787 +2559161 +0274183C +1672748 +0912303 -2015349C +2532013 +0321489 -2951058C +2484719 -1038934 -3151352C +1564967 -1809811 -2416050C +0739136 -1132201 -1498199C -0226393 -1855415 -0738085C -0349226 -3249123 -0898282C -1327260 -3905777 -0127931C -2116028 -3168942 +0725202C -1926241 -1784057 +0818234C +1428653 -3229054 -2554389C +0512925 -3918908 -1826026C +2070487 -0940823 +3166428C +0853881 -0649365 +2623097O -2542254 +1637373 -1754394O -2256798 +1518994 +2502283O +0652345 +3623094 +0311633H +1701827 +1978439 -1842996H +3222327 +0947471 -3498149H -2879838 -3635584 +1330589H -2536316 -1192121 +1484891H +2073350 -3741322 -3256858H +0414471 -4990953 -1937411H +3141268 -1520786 -3864136H -1450487 -4977328 -0215314H +3994011 -0296089 +2509353H -0120792 -0973916 +2939776H +2825164 +0954526 +0652517H +2353195 -1539690 +4013220

46

38[Tc(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Tc -0504419 +0943061 +0234166N +1083560 +0154720 +1579801N +0826069 +0173721 -1353140N -1015243 -1200783 +0087748N +3049417 -0390967 +2375187C +2391837 +0322219 +1443840C -1873475 +1480409 -1035591C -1680503 +1363905 +1720420C +0214436 +2745530 +0280723C +1706272 +0862469 -2074220C +2574361 +0255279 -2988929C +2526356 -1108291 -3160208C +1599940 -1865849 -2419421C +0758442 -1176405 -1522106C -0210013 -1902512 -0757518C -0306620 -3301951 -0900819C -1274801 -3972735 -0130341C -2085723 -3250323 +0713069C -1927354 -1862165 +0793779C +1482435 -3287446 -2540211C +0569818 -3976667 -1809860C +2127013 -1052594 +3150384C +0906737 -0706002 +2650246O -2683800 +1787640 -1795683O -2385084 +1588355 +2605706O +0670184 +3805015 +0297671H +1731334 +1931761 -1922021H +3269949 +0869587 -3542277H -2841430 -3730098 +1318181H -2553912 -1276930 +1451152H +2140017 -3800678 -3229811H +0484408 -5051428 -1903805H +3188740 -1606081 -3856424H -1371662 -5047534 -0211074H +4052106 -0430539 +2478352H -0069062 -1016679 +2977964H +2880599 +0929112 +0703190H +2412735 -1692893 +3965231

38[Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Re -0506387 +0945561 +0234076N +1079472 +0145452 +1563853N +0827178 +0166913 -1343083N -1004040 -1199665 +0089193N +3043709 -0394781 +2360887C +2389012 +0316952 +1429217C -1870502 +1487578 -1021487C -1673956 +1368340 +1711148C +0202020 +2739241 +0279311C +1705973 +0861594 -2063586C +2573862 +0257139 -2978911C +2531259 -1106830 -3153076C +1607459 -1869331 -2414337C +0765507 -1183923 -1516787C -0201687 -1908345 -0754692C -0302877 -3305933 -0897471C -1275852 -3970960 -0128166C -2085771 -3243021 +0712346C -1922137 -1856466 +0795163C +1489077 -3291074 -2535055C +0574681 -3980251 -1806031C +2121667 -1057774 +3135889C +0901452 -0716211 +2634818O -2687028 +1801263 -1780745O -2380684 +1594721 +2601541O +0657251 +3805167 +0293658H +1724983 +1929791 -1906323H +3267444 +0874551 -3531043H -2845025 -3718920 +1315836H -2544361 -1265087 +1450382H +2147055 -3804762 -3223814H +0488990 -5054833 -1900913H +3196140 -1600125 -3849971H -1377901 -5045326 -0207013H +4046379 -0432359 +2465782H -0075648 -1025659 +2958531H +2873471 +0926337 +0688377H +2407868 -1696657 +3951475

47

61Ir(ppy)3 XP S0T1 (TD-B3LYPRe-TZPCN-DZPH-DZ)Ir -0055534 +0191782 +0116633N +0757587 -1850103 -1074310N -1331813 -0121677 -1373523C -0680124 +1761613 +1158030C +1868610 -0242906 +0638232C +1850271 -2383882 -0521883C +2490286 -1483497 +0442675N +0924180 +1838634 -0964279C -1078281 -1257257 +1081808C +0660889 +3053130 -0448961C -0212558 +3030587 +0731805C -2499214 -0869105 -0864995C -2223105 -1630843 +0362633C +2477685 +0716065 +1448379C +3645685 +0401144 +2135883C +4233541 -0846405 +1984215C +3661638 -1779208 +1129972C +2297515 -3649618 -0890029C +1572716 -4360790 -1836101C +0434810 -3791854 -2391673C +0057874 -2520951 -1978999C +1734963 +1696203 -2010662C +2321739 +2785381 -2628285C +2046609 +4052320 -2131241C +1213168 +4190202 -1032826C -0573172 +4169825 +1437806C -1399713 +4067009 +2553790C -1874214 +2829042 +2966213C -1518487 +1678403 +2271791C -2975984 -2700064 +0838914C -2618552 -3349899 +2020017C -1494714 -2957657 +2734551C -0718635 -1902122 +2250936C -1686554 +0962814 -2254509C -3672204 -0822385 -1532790C -3878069 -0001995 -2679801C -2868473 +0987275 -2899244H +2048486 +1700781 +1578946H +4101702 +1147610 +2777926H +5146178 -1088832 +2515163H +4135302 -2745494 +1004356H +3190012 -4076425 -0450254H +1896132 -5353066 -2135524H -0159960 -4320710 -3127912H -0813593 -2003569 -2363151H +1891689 +0680844 -2353260H +2972608 +2642326 -3483177H +2479550 +4930790 -2597969H +0993312 +5173291 -0638575H -0223294 +5149283 +1133063H -1679373 +4964219 +3095887H -2528780 +2758304 +3828897H -1900767 +0715702 +2583563H -3840919 -3050386 +0284322H -3222006 -4181470 +2372377H -1213690 -3474098 +3646728H +0177858 -1604821 +2786918H -0936426 +1707703 -2415169H -4492743 -1419508 -1140604H -4863302 +0111122 -3108628H -3045736 +1791947 -3600586

61Ir(ppy)3 MXP S0T1 (TD-B3LYPRe-TZPCN-DZPH-DZ)Ir -0145947 +0564575 +0165466N +0928223 -1840875 -1821194N -1379993 -0054515 -1363300C -0703964 +2033977 +1429061C +1775002 -0104439 +0479767C +1357097 -2303459 -0637632C +2216679 -1397153 +0156122N +0758100 +2281079 -0761781C -0958832 -1053760 +1020019C +0584478 +3450487 -0098610C -0242497 +3338122 +1099763C -2189938 -1131937 -1061889C -1924712 -1727309 +0231418C +2648999 +0744692 +1168211C +3906609 +0308157 +1569764C +4323747 -0983869 +1273856C +3478731 -1827510 +0565295C +0986315 -3552453 -0142460C +0127943 -4342345 -0888515C -0324830 -3865330 -2111112C +0107356 -2615429 -2530859C +1573466 +2211135 -1819179C +2228002 +3322587 -2313692C +2038077 +4542809 -1670801C +1219808 +4605862 -0557134C -0554920 +4421447 +1923132C -1330098 +4235709 +3057051C -1796539 +2961454 +3383933C -1487250 +1874535 +2580847C -2504756 -2919165 +0679016C -2131648 -3458127 +1896548C -1173980 -2807693 +2679905C -0598580 -1623622 +2245993C -1498001 +0547419 -2569832C -3134796 -1558749 -1988994C -3250790 -0940548 -3219790C -2402824 +0134867 -3514567H +2340341 +1753850 +1421571H +4561763 +0983233 +2112732H +5307214 -1327963 +1577883H +3808898 -2827474 +0297933H +1323599 -3864617 +0838491H -0201676 -5304160 -0509956H -1008943 -4442307 -2724203H -0236166 -2202634 -3476319H +1703021 +1222293 -2246304H +2884976 +3229584 -3170623H +2540339 +5435972 -2027730H +1085503 +5544685 -0035041H -0199424 +5418738 +1686248H -1574939 +5083377 +3688714H -2408310 +2822756 +4270731H -1858962 +0889700 +2839514H -3235434 -3441733 +0070518H -2579276 -4385069 +2240170H -0877233 -3237556 +3632479H +0161027 -1140609 +2853195H -0835291 +1382830 -2747956H -3780420 -2390490 -1736408H -3987579 -1278432 -3939285H -2454155 +0650149 -4466669

43

28Re(CO)3(Cl)(bipy) S0 min (Harabuchi2016JCTC)C -3275103 -0044247 +1502075C -3196555 -0052099 +2892632C -2100549 -0066125 +0740179H -4106718 -0034369 +3493527C -1939620 -0083561 +3496676N -0878233 -0094186 +1337309H -1823889 -0091815 +4580356C -0810560 -0103192 +2683419H +0188925 -0125931 +3115734H -4248407 -0020601 +1016325C -2100549 -0066125 -0740179N -0878233 -0094186 -1337309C -3275103 -0044247 -1502075C -0810560 -0103192 -2683419C -3196555 -0052099 -2892632C -1939620 -0083561 -3496676H -4248407 -0020601 -1016325H +0188925 -0125931 -3115734H -4106718 -0034369 -3493527H -1823889 -0091815 -4580356Re +0894823 -0052419 +0000000C +2265517 +0103478 +1361644C +1070050 -1967897 +0000000C +2265517 +0103478 -1361644Cl +0509433 +2478712 +0000000O +1176732 -3127265 +0000000O +3066717 +0208112 +2195548O +3066717 +0208112 -2195548

44Ir(CO)(Cl)(ppy)2 S0 min (Brahim2014CTC)C +0263266 -1632625 +2665885C +0723630 -2043724 +3917764C +1779326 -1374338 +4550821C +2374717 -0288470 +3922698C +1913866 +0131515 +2660906C +0844071 -0537695 +2013079C +2477168 +1266785 +1937072N +1897397 +1520647 +0725439C +2326835 +2544498 -0034846C +3364088 +3376550 +0356442C +3976629 +3137455 +1590675C +3531594 +2084759 +2375781Ir +0320355 +0259705 +0206373C +1421556 -1058029 -0708865O +2032462 -1852827 -1274433C -0975454 +1651673 +1045719C -1597864 +2532878 +0123098C -2480957 +3535637 +0563179C -2767834 +3674956 +1915756C -2174117 +2805477 +2834992C -1292794 +1812508 +2401452C -1293905 +2332234 -1299595C -1882354 +3043758 -2359608C -1537281 +2756067 -3672401C -0604082 +1748249 -3928887C -0056978 +1075581 -2845330N -0377571 +1361933 -1571410Cl -1593377 -1196652 -0190960H +1808999 +2679522 -0976566H +3677314 +4189216 -0289639H +3992756 +1885902 +3336007H +4791542 +3768090 +1934161H +3193454 +0228844 +4416327H +0255975 -2894572 +4407875H +2132433 -1701353 +5524807H -0856061 +1143678 +3136255H -2951059 +4211943 -0145515H -2401900 +2899950 +3894334H -3451157 +4450630 +2250512H +0658281 +0273137 -2987369H -0313243 +1479897 -4938652H -2618753 +3809839 -2148707H -1997318 +3304541 -4489593H -0558505 -2157732 +2190307

73[Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 +1449479N -0992742 -1055937 +2959913C -0445075 -2255534 +3287288C +0727450 -2656787 +2490587C +1386578 -3871365 +2649228C +2481127 -4167513 +1852931C +2897074 -3239347 +0908338C +2203650 -2046997 +0797049N +1145261 -1751497 +1567751C -0980351 -3029886 +4311202C -2085802 -2573366 +5010534C -2637782 -1346085 +4670335C -2062678 -0619292 +3642772N +1006891 +0871571 -0174848C +1994402 +1768860 -0129160C +2566095 +2304708 -1279235C +2106682 +1903083 -2516324C +1069124 +0967669 -2588381C +0527817 +0483309 -3853931N +1033088 +0948199 -4981383C +0526491 +0484537 -6138533C -0526491 -0484537 -6138533N -1033088 -0948199 -4981383C -0527817 -0483309 -3853931C -1069124 -0967669 -2588381C -2106682 -1903083 -2516324C -2566095 -2304708 -1279235C -1994402 -1768860 -0129160N -1006891 -0871571 -0174848C -0539800 -0480275 -1390374C +0539800 +0480275 -1390374C -1036969 -0955264 -7374197C -0521594 -0481145 -8549357C +0521594 +0481145 -8549357C +1036969 +0955264 -7374197N +0992742 +1055937 +2959913C +2062678 +0619292 +3642772C +2637782 +1346085 +4670335C +2085802 +2573366 +5010534H +2506211 +3167587 +5808383C +0980351 +3029886 +4311202C +0445075 +2255534 +3287288C -0727450 +2656787 +2490587N -1145261 +1751497 +1567751C -2203650 +2046997 +0797049C -2897074 +3239347 +0908338C -2481127 +4167513 +1852931H -2998103 +5108434 +1969656C -1386578 +3871365 +2649228H +2998103 -5108434 +1969656H -2506211 -3167587 +5808383H -2461633 +0339491 +3347998H -3497574 -0949065 +5186817H +3742212 -3425827 +0264261H +2497190 -1298289 +0076926H +2461633 -0339491 +3347998H +3497574 +0949065 +5186817H -3742212 +3425827 +0264261H -2497190 +1298289 +0076926H +2337257 +2061239 +0852028H +3362890 +3025461 -1184942H +2533060 +2296448 -3425459H +1831717 +1687397 -7357098H +0908961 +0839228 -9492212H -0908961 -0839228 -9492212H -1831717 -1687397 -7357098H -2533060 -2296448 -3425459H -3362890 -3025461 -1184942H -2337257 -2061239 +0852028H +1048298 -4581822 +3384287H -0537432 -3978234 +4564316H -1048298 +4581822 +3384287H +0537432 +3978234 +4564316

44

77[Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 +1153207N -1031338 -1047808 +2649192C -0459450 -2248875 +2956082C +0707296 -2620931 +2224543C +1341410 -3850821 +2484940C +2485701 -4165133 +1727986C +2929791 -3273130 +0778125C +2244192 -2068550 +0582564N +1162331 -1740342 +1285729C +0796574 -4708061 +3495243C -0313184 -4352633 +4193480C -0978265 -3108682 +3942920C -2133506 -2688488 +4628767C -2699923 -1474391 +4312043C -2121881 -0677318 +3316952N +1041191 +0825410 -0462362C +2083002 +1661157 -0412379C +2699562 +2148879 -1561623C +2227863 +1766695 -2801952C +1133060 +0897451 -2877589C +0563217 +0444794 -4145018N +1104715 +0869872 -5273634C +0563594 +0442520 -6432045C -0563594 -0442520 -6432045N -1104715 -0869872 -5273634C -0563217 -0444794 -4145018C -1133060 -0897451 -2877589C -2227863 -1766695 -2801952C -2699562 -2148879 -1561623C -2083002 -1661157 -0412379N -1041191 -0825410 -0462362C -0565478 -0449272 -1680022C +0565478 +0449272 -1680022C -1111763 -0869723 -7668505C -0559539 -0437208 -8844227C +0559539 +0437208 -8844227C +1111763 +0869723 -7668505N +1031338 +1047808 +2649192C +2121881 +0677318 +3316952C +2699923 +1474391 +4312043C +2133506 +2688488 +4628767H +2563877 +3320886 +5394200C +0978265 +3108682 +3942920C +0459450 +2248875 +2956082C -0707296 +2620931 +2224543N -1162331 +1740342 +1285729C -2244192 +2068550 +0582564C -2929791 +3273130 +0778125C -2485701 +4165133 +1727986H -3001873 +5100898 +1898163C -1341410 +3850821 +2484940C -0796574 +4708061 +3495243C +0313184 +4352633 +4193480H +3001873 -5100898 +1898163H -2563877 -3320886 +5394200H -2550518 +0278490 +3052723H -3587197 -1119833 +4816894H -0717956 -5007062 +4954685H +1290989 -5650894 +3690280H +3803419 -3481883 +0177221H +2578921 -1353473 -0154691H +2550518 -0278490 +3052723H +3587197 +1119833 +4816894H +0717956 +5007062 +4954685H -1290989 +5650894 +3690280H -3803419 +3481883 +0177221H -2578921 +1353473 -0154691H +2430679 +1941183 +0570879H +3540925 +2819938 -1465123H +2686992 +2126740 -3710875H +1964057 +1536925 -7651679H +0975769 +0762037 -9789185H -0975769 -0762037 -9789185H -1964057 -1536925 -7651679H -2686992 -2126740 -3710875H -3540925 -2819938 -1465123H -2430679 -1941183 +0570879

73[Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 -1158577N +1162983 -1734480 -1265064C +0689890 -2629635 -2176146C -0465272 -2269047 -2912355N -1031573 -1058556 -2647624C -2109435 -0737499 -3350222C -2630726 -1622276 -4315096N -2100512 -2801593 -4579794C -0997323 -3145608 -3873239C -0351786 -4407422 -4081553C +0753130 -4756144 -3369636C +1310594 -3871908 -2390238N +2412045 -4219967 -1683019C +2853229 -3341100 -0802498C +2239581 -2092991 -0578877H -2576239 +0216879 -3158425H -3512946 -1329181 -4869450H -0772548 -5073014 -4823123H +1240821 -5708943 -3525241H +3732157 -3601276 -0226859H +2631836 -1400843 +0150716N -1162983 +1734480 -1265064C -0689890 +2629635 -2176146C +0465272 +2269047 -2912355N +1031573 +1058556 -2647624C +2109435 +0737499 -3350222C +2630726 +1622276 -4315096N +2100512 +2801593 -4579794C +0997323 +3145608 -3873239C +0351786 +4407422 -4081553C -0753130 +4756144 -3369636C -1310594 +3871908 -2390238N -2412045 +4219967 -1683019C -2853229 +3341100 -0802498C -2239581 +2092991 -0578877H +2576239 -0216879 -3158425H +3512946 +1329181 -4869450H +0772548 +5073014 -4823123H -1240821 +5708943 -3525241H -3732157 +3601276 -0226859H -2631836 +1400843 +0150716N -1055470 -0810407 +0459583C -0572365 -0440016 +1675577C +0572365 +0440016 +1675577N +1055470 +0810407 +0459583C +2112156 +1625885 +0407501C +2737420 +2101291 +1557305C +2257332 +1727751 +2796205C +1147258 +0877836 +2872673C +0570228 +0435012 +4140040C -0570228 -0435012 +4140040C -1147258 -0877836 +2872673C -2257332 -1727751 +2796205C -2737420 -2101291 +1557305C -2112156 -1625885 +0407501N +1118484 +0852421 +5268068C +0570894 +0433580 +6426040C +1124571 +0853645 +7662534C +0565830 +0429186 +8837852C -0565830 -0429186 +8837852C -1124571 -0853645 +7662534C -0570894 -0433580 +6426040N -1118484 -0852421 +5268068H +2467692 +1899436 -0574400H +3592219 +2754809 +1460913H +2722567 +2079141 +3705410H +1986375 +1508481 +7645916H +0986545 +0747821 +9782939H -0986545 -0747821 +9782939H -1986375 -1508481 +7645916H -2722567 -2079141 +3705410H -3592219 -2754809 +1460913H -2467692 -1899436 -0574400

45

49[Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Re -0037760 -0172581 +0000000N -0314508 +1557127 +1333112N -0314508 +1557127 -1333112C -1907856 -0659416 +0000000C +0341701 -1495220 -1352453C +0341701 -1495220 +1352453C -0396602 +1517080 +2663900C -0358827 +2666020 +3446023C -0220325 +3894692 +2835086C -0155383 +3960603 +1438957C -0224326 +2763420 +0722029C -0224326 +2763420 -0722029C -0155383 +3960603 -1438957C -0220325 +3894692 -2835086C -0358827 +2666020 -3446023C -0396602 +1517080 -2663900C -0010350 +5218975 +0714943C -0010350 +5218975 -0714943O -3029255 -0935997 +0000000O +0578972 -2265930 -2181036O +0578972 -2265930 +2181036H -0479351 +0539285 +3109806H -0424617 +2577492 +4518405H -0424617 +2577492 -4518405H -0479351 +0539285 -3109806H -0166316 +4803703 +3412838H -0166316 +4803703 -3412838N +0128994 +6337138 +1403250N +0128994 +6337138 -1403250C +0278319 +7483599 -0716852C +0278319 +7483599 +0716852C +0445140 +8707766 -1411275H +0444805 +8690836 -2491751C +0445140 +8707766 +1411275H +0444805 +8690836 +2491751C +0604950 +9871211 -0709972H +0734907 +10805655 -1236594C +0604950 +9871211 +0709972H +0734907 +10805655 +1236594C +2696074 +0904680 +1152995C +3935047 +1518525 +1193811C +4567569 +1841454 +0000000H +5531840 +2328977 +0000000C +3935047 +1518525 -1193811H +4386297 +1738648 -2149061N +2067935 +0608063 +0000000C +2696074 +0904680 -1152995H +2180709 +0646260 -2064653H +4386297 +1738648 +2149061H +2180709 +0646260 +2064653

38[Mn(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Mn -0462641 +0871149 +0224406N +1032095 +0168187 +1521057N +0802574 +0210318 -1296362N -1002827 -1137193 +0115222N +2993137 -0287769 +2384035C +2337150 +0366533 +1408314C -1738897 +1346945 -0984395C -1561503 +1266749 +1620727C +0215787 +2559161 +0274183C +1672748 +0912303 -2015349C +2532013 +0321489 -2951058C +2484719 -1038934 -3151352C +1564967 -1809811 -2416050C +0739136 -1132201 -1498199C -0226393 -1855415 -0738085C -0349226 -3249123 -0898282C -1327260 -3905777 -0127931C -2116028 -3168942 +0725202C -1926241 -1784057 +0818234C +1428653 -3229054 -2554389C +0512925 -3918908 -1826026C +2070487 -0940823 +3166428C +0853881 -0649365 +2623097O -2542254 +1637373 -1754394O -2256798 +1518994 +2502283O +0652345 +3623094 +0311633H +1701827 +1978439 -1842996H +3222327 +0947471 -3498149H -2879838 -3635584 +1330589H -2536316 -1192121 +1484891H +2073350 -3741322 -3256858H +0414471 -4990953 -1937411H +3141268 -1520786 -3864136H -1450487 -4977328 -0215314H +3994011 -0296089 +2509353H -0120792 -0973916 +2939776H +2825164 +0954526 +0652517H +2353195 -1539690 +4013220

46

38[Tc(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Tc -0504419 +0943061 +0234166N +1083560 +0154720 +1579801N +0826069 +0173721 -1353140N -1015243 -1200783 +0087748N +3049417 -0390967 +2375187C +2391837 +0322219 +1443840C -1873475 +1480409 -1035591C -1680503 +1363905 +1720420C +0214436 +2745530 +0280723C +1706272 +0862469 -2074220C +2574361 +0255279 -2988929C +2526356 -1108291 -3160208C +1599940 -1865849 -2419421C +0758442 -1176405 -1522106C -0210013 -1902512 -0757518C -0306620 -3301951 -0900819C -1274801 -3972735 -0130341C -2085723 -3250323 +0713069C -1927354 -1862165 +0793779C +1482435 -3287446 -2540211C +0569818 -3976667 -1809860C +2127013 -1052594 +3150384C +0906737 -0706002 +2650246O -2683800 +1787640 -1795683O -2385084 +1588355 +2605706O +0670184 +3805015 +0297671H +1731334 +1931761 -1922021H +3269949 +0869587 -3542277H -2841430 -3730098 +1318181H -2553912 -1276930 +1451152H +2140017 -3800678 -3229811H +0484408 -5051428 -1903805H +3188740 -1606081 -3856424H -1371662 -5047534 -0211074H +4052106 -0430539 +2478352H -0069062 -1016679 +2977964H +2880599 +0929112 +0703190H +2412735 -1692893 +3965231

38[Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Re -0506387 +0945561 +0234076N +1079472 +0145452 +1563853N +0827178 +0166913 -1343083N -1004040 -1199665 +0089193N +3043709 -0394781 +2360887C +2389012 +0316952 +1429217C -1870502 +1487578 -1021487C -1673956 +1368340 +1711148C +0202020 +2739241 +0279311C +1705973 +0861594 -2063586C +2573862 +0257139 -2978911C +2531259 -1106830 -3153076C +1607459 -1869331 -2414337C +0765507 -1183923 -1516787C -0201687 -1908345 -0754692C -0302877 -3305933 -0897471C -1275852 -3970960 -0128166C -2085771 -3243021 +0712346C -1922137 -1856466 +0795163C +1489077 -3291074 -2535055C +0574681 -3980251 -1806031C +2121667 -1057774 +3135889C +0901452 -0716211 +2634818O -2687028 +1801263 -1780745O -2380684 +1594721 +2601541O +0657251 +3805167 +0293658H +1724983 +1929791 -1906323H +3267444 +0874551 -3531043H -2845025 -3718920 +1315836H -2544361 -1265087 +1450382H +2147055 -3804762 -3223814H +0488990 -5054833 -1900913H +3196140 -1600125 -3849971H -1377901 -5045326 -0207013H +4046379 -0432359 +2465782H -0075648 -1025659 +2958531H +2873471 +0926337 +0688377H +2407868 -1696657 +3951475

47

28Re(CO)3(Cl)(bipy) S0 min (Harabuchi2016JCTC)C -3275103 -0044247 +1502075C -3196555 -0052099 +2892632C -2100549 -0066125 +0740179H -4106718 -0034369 +3493527C -1939620 -0083561 +3496676N -0878233 -0094186 +1337309H -1823889 -0091815 +4580356C -0810560 -0103192 +2683419H +0188925 -0125931 +3115734H -4248407 -0020601 +1016325C -2100549 -0066125 -0740179N -0878233 -0094186 -1337309C -3275103 -0044247 -1502075C -0810560 -0103192 -2683419C -3196555 -0052099 -2892632C -1939620 -0083561 -3496676H -4248407 -0020601 -1016325H +0188925 -0125931 -3115734H -4106718 -0034369 -3493527H -1823889 -0091815 -4580356Re +0894823 -0052419 +0000000C +2265517 +0103478 +1361644C +1070050 -1967897 +0000000C +2265517 +0103478 -1361644Cl +0509433 +2478712 +0000000O +1176732 -3127265 +0000000O +3066717 +0208112 +2195548O +3066717 +0208112 -2195548

44Ir(CO)(Cl)(ppy)2 S0 min (Brahim2014CTC)C +0263266 -1632625 +2665885C +0723630 -2043724 +3917764C +1779326 -1374338 +4550821C +2374717 -0288470 +3922698C +1913866 +0131515 +2660906C +0844071 -0537695 +2013079C +2477168 +1266785 +1937072N +1897397 +1520647 +0725439C +2326835 +2544498 -0034846C +3364088 +3376550 +0356442C +3976629 +3137455 +1590675C +3531594 +2084759 +2375781Ir +0320355 +0259705 +0206373C +1421556 -1058029 -0708865O +2032462 -1852827 -1274433C -0975454 +1651673 +1045719C -1597864 +2532878 +0123098C -2480957 +3535637 +0563179C -2767834 +3674956 +1915756C -2174117 +2805477 +2834992C -1292794 +1812508 +2401452C -1293905 +2332234 -1299595C -1882354 +3043758 -2359608C -1537281 +2756067 -3672401C -0604082 +1748249 -3928887C -0056978 +1075581 -2845330N -0377571 +1361933 -1571410Cl -1593377 -1196652 -0190960H +1808999 +2679522 -0976566H +3677314 +4189216 -0289639H +3992756 +1885902 +3336007H +4791542 +3768090 +1934161H +3193454 +0228844 +4416327H +0255975 -2894572 +4407875H +2132433 -1701353 +5524807H -0856061 +1143678 +3136255H -2951059 +4211943 -0145515H -2401900 +2899950 +3894334H -3451157 +4450630 +2250512H +0658281 +0273137 -2987369H -0313243 +1479897 -4938652H -2618753 +3809839 -2148707H -1997318 +3304541 -4489593H -0558505 -2157732 +2190307

73[Ru(bipy)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 +1449479N -0992742 -1055937 +2959913C -0445075 -2255534 +3287288C +0727450 -2656787 +2490587C +1386578 -3871365 +2649228C +2481127 -4167513 +1852931C +2897074 -3239347 +0908338C +2203650 -2046997 +0797049N +1145261 -1751497 +1567751C -0980351 -3029886 +4311202C -2085802 -2573366 +5010534C -2637782 -1346085 +4670335C -2062678 -0619292 +3642772N +1006891 +0871571 -0174848C +1994402 +1768860 -0129160C +2566095 +2304708 -1279235C +2106682 +1903083 -2516324C +1069124 +0967669 -2588381C +0527817 +0483309 -3853931N +1033088 +0948199 -4981383C +0526491 +0484537 -6138533C -0526491 -0484537 -6138533N -1033088 -0948199 -4981383C -0527817 -0483309 -3853931C -1069124 -0967669 -2588381C -2106682 -1903083 -2516324C -2566095 -2304708 -1279235C -1994402 -1768860 -0129160N -1006891 -0871571 -0174848C -0539800 -0480275 -1390374C +0539800 +0480275 -1390374C -1036969 -0955264 -7374197C -0521594 -0481145 -8549357C +0521594 +0481145 -8549357C +1036969 +0955264 -7374197N +0992742 +1055937 +2959913C +2062678 +0619292 +3642772C +2637782 +1346085 +4670335C +2085802 +2573366 +5010534H +2506211 +3167587 +5808383C +0980351 +3029886 +4311202C +0445075 +2255534 +3287288C -0727450 +2656787 +2490587N -1145261 +1751497 +1567751C -2203650 +2046997 +0797049C -2897074 +3239347 +0908338C -2481127 +4167513 +1852931H -2998103 +5108434 +1969656C -1386578 +3871365 +2649228H +2998103 -5108434 +1969656H -2506211 -3167587 +5808383H -2461633 +0339491 +3347998H -3497574 -0949065 +5186817H +3742212 -3425827 +0264261H +2497190 -1298289 +0076926H +2461633 -0339491 +3347998H +3497574 +0949065 +5186817H -3742212 +3425827 +0264261H -2497190 +1298289 +0076926H +2337257 +2061239 +0852028H +3362890 +3025461 -1184942H +2533060 +2296448 -3425459H +1831717 +1687397 -7357098H +0908961 +0839228 -9492212H -0908961 -0839228 -9492212H -1831717 -1687397 -7357098H -2533060 -2296448 -3425459H -3362890 -3025461 -1184942H -2337257 -2061239 +0852028H +1048298 -4581822 +3384287H -0537432 -3978234 +4564316H -1048298 +4581822 +3384287H +0537432 +3978234 +4564316

44

77[Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 +1153207N -1031338 -1047808 +2649192C -0459450 -2248875 +2956082C +0707296 -2620931 +2224543C +1341410 -3850821 +2484940C +2485701 -4165133 +1727986C +2929791 -3273130 +0778125C +2244192 -2068550 +0582564N +1162331 -1740342 +1285729C +0796574 -4708061 +3495243C -0313184 -4352633 +4193480C -0978265 -3108682 +3942920C -2133506 -2688488 +4628767C -2699923 -1474391 +4312043C -2121881 -0677318 +3316952N +1041191 +0825410 -0462362C +2083002 +1661157 -0412379C +2699562 +2148879 -1561623C +2227863 +1766695 -2801952C +1133060 +0897451 -2877589C +0563217 +0444794 -4145018N +1104715 +0869872 -5273634C +0563594 +0442520 -6432045C -0563594 -0442520 -6432045N -1104715 -0869872 -5273634C -0563217 -0444794 -4145018C -1133060 -0897451 -2877589C -2227863 -1766695 -2801952C -2699562 -2148879 -1561623C -2083002 -1661157 -0412379N -1041191 -0825410 -0462362C -0565478 -0449272 -1680022C +0565478 +0449272 -1680022C -1111763 -0869723 -7668505C -0559539 -0437208 -8844227C +0559539 +0437208 -8844227C +1111763 +0869723 -7668505N +1031338 +1047808 +2649192C +2121881 +0677318 +3316952C +2699923 +1474391 +4312043C +2133506 +2688488 +4628767H +2563877 +3320886 +5394200C +0978265 +3108682 +3942920C +0459450 +2248875 +2956082C -0707296 +2620931 +2224543N -1162331 +1740342 +1285729C -2244192 +2068550 +0582564C -2929791 +3273130 +0778125C -2485701 +4165133 +1727986H -3001873 +5100898 +1898163C -1341410 +3850821 +2484940C -0796574 +4708061 +3495243C +0313184 +4352633 +4193480H +3001873 -5100898 +1898163H -2563877 -3320886 +5394200H -2550518 +0278490 +3052723H -3587197 -1119833 +4816894H -0717956 -5007062 +4954685H +1290989 -5650894 +3690280H +3803419 -3481883 +0177221H +2578921 -1353473 -0154691H +2550518 -0278490 +3052723H +3587197 +1119833 +4816894H +0717956 +5007062 +4954685H -1290989 +5650894 +3690280H -3803419 +3481883 +0177221H -2578921 +1353473 -0154691H +2430679 +1941183 +0570879H +3540925 +2819938 -1465123H +2686992 +2126740 -3710875H +1964057 +1536925 -7651679H +0975769 +0762037 -9789185H -0975769 -0762037 -9789185H -1964057 -1536925 -7651679H -2686992 -2126740 -3710875H -3540925 -2819938 -1465123H -2430679 -1941183 +0570879

73[Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 -1158577N +1162983 -1734480 -1265064C +0689890 -2629635 -2176146C -0465272 -2269047 -2912355N -1031573 -1058556 -2647624C -2109435 -0737499 -3350222C -2630726 -1622276 -4315096N -2100512 -2801593 -4579794C -0997323 -3145608 -3873239C -0351786 -4407422 -4081553C +0753130 -4756144 -3369636C +1310594 -3871908 -2390238N +2412045 -4219967 -1683019C +2853229 -3341100 -0802498C +2239581 -2092991 -0578877H -2576239 +0216879 -3158425H -3512946 -1329181 -4869450H -0772548 -5073014 -4823123H +1240821 -5708943 -3525241H +3732157 -3601276 -0226859H +2631836 -1400843 +0150716N -1162983 +1734480 -1265064C -0689890 +2629635 -2176146C +0465272 +2269047 -2912355N +1031573 +1058556 -2647624C +2109435 +0737499 -3350222C +2630726 +1622276 -4315096N +2100512 +2801593 -4579794C +0997323 +3145608 -3873239C +0351786 +4407422 -4081553C -0753130 +4756144 -3369636C -1310594 +3871908 -2390238N -2412045 +4219967 -1683019C -2853229 +3341100 -0802498C -2239581 +2092991 -0578877H +2576239 -0216879 -3158425H +3512946 +1329181 -4869450H +0772548 +5073014 -4823123H -1240821 +5708943 -3525241H -3732157 +3601276 -0226859H -2631836 +1400843 +0150716N -1055470 -0810407 +0459583C -0572365 -0440016 +1675577C +0572365 +0440016 +1675577N +1055470 +0810407 +0459583C +2112156 +1625885 +0407501C +2737420 +2101291 +1557305C +2257332 +1727751 +2796205C +1147258 +0877836 +2872673C +0570228 +0435012 +4140040C -0570228 -0435012 +4140040C -1147258 -0877836 +2872673C -2257332 -1727751 +2796205C -2737420 -2101291 +1557305C -2112156 -1625885 +0407501N +1118484 +0852421 +5268068C +0570894 +0433580 +6426040C +1124571 +0853645 +7662534C +0565830 +0429186 +8837852C -0565830 -0429186 +8837852C -1124571 -0853645 +7662534C -0570894 -0433580 +6426040N -1118484 -0852421 +5268068H +2467692 +1899436 -0574400H +3592219 +2754809 +1460913H +2722567 +2079141 +3705410H +1986375 +1508481 +7645916H +0986545 +0747821 +9782939H -0986545 -0747821 +9782939H -1986375 -1508481 +7645916H -2722567 -2079141 +3705410H -3592219 -2754809 +1460913H -2467692 -1899436 -0574400

45

49[Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Re -0037760 -0172581 +0000000N -0314508 +1557127 +1333112N -0314508 +1557127 -1333112C -1907856 -0659416 +0000000C +0341701 -1495220 -1352453C +0341701 -1495220 +1352453C -0396602 +1517080 +2663900C -0358827 +2666020 +3446023C -0220325 +3894692 +2835086C -0155383 +3960603 +1438957C -0224326 +2763420 +0722029C -0224326 +2763420 -0722029C -0155383 +3960603 -1438957C -0220325 +3894692 -2835086C -0358827 +2666020 -3446023C -0396602 +1517080 -2663900C -0010350 +5218975 +0714943C -0010350 +5218975 -0714943O -3029255 -0935997 +0000000O +0578972 -2265930 -2181036O +0578972 -2265930 +2181036H -0479351 +0539285 +3109806H -0424617 +2577492 +4518405H -0424617 +2577492 -4518405H -0479351 +0539285 -3109806H -0166316 +4803703 +3412838H -0166316 +4803703 -3412838N +0128994 +6337138 +1403250N +0128994 +6337138 -1403250C +0278319 +7483599 -0716852C +0278319 +7483599 +0716852C +0445140 +8707766 -1411275H +0444805 +8690836 -2491751C +0445140 +8707766 +1411275H +0444805 +8690836 +2491751C +0604950 +9871211 -0709972H +0734907 +10805655 -1236594C +0604950 +9871211 +0709972H +0734907 +10805655 +1236594C +2696074 +0904680 +1152995C +3935047 +1518525 +1193811C +4567569 +1841454 +0000000H +5531840 +2328977 +0000000C +3935047 +1518525 -1193811H +4386297 +1738648 -2149061N +2067935 +0608063 +0000000C +2696074 +0904680 -1152995H +2180709 +0646260 -2064653H +4386297 +1738648 +2149061H +2180709 +0646260 +2064653

38[Mn(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Mn -0462641 +0871149 +0224406N +1032095 +0168187 +1521057N +0802574 +0210318 -1296362N -1002827 -1137193 +0115222N +2993137 -0287769 +2384035C +2337150 +0366533 +1408314C -1738897 +1346945 -0984395C -1561503 +1266749 +1620727C +0215787 +2559161 +0274183C +1672748 +0912303 -2015349C +2532013 +0321489 -2951058C +2484719 -1038934 -3151352C +1564967 -1809811 -2416050C +0739136 -1132201 -1498199C -0226393 -1855415 -0738085C -0349226 -3249123 -0898282C -1327260 -3905777 -0127931C -2116028 -3168942 +0725202C -1926241 -1784057 +0818234C +1428653 -3229054 -2554389C +0512925 -3918908 -1826026C +2070487 -0940823 +3166428C +0853881 -0649365 +2623097O -2542254 +1637373 -1754394O -2256798 +1518994 +2502283O +0652345 +3623094 +0311633H +1701827 +1978439 -1842996H +3222327 +0947471 -3498149H -2879838 -3635584 +1330589H -2536316 -1192121 +1484891H +2073350 -3741322 -3256858H +0414471 -4990953 -1937411H +3141268 -1520786 -3864136H -1450487 -4977328 -0215314H +3994011 -0296089 +2509353H -0120792 -0973916 +2939776H +2825164 +0954526 +0652517H +2353195 -1539690 +4013220

46

38[Tc(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Tc -0504419 +0943061 +0234166N +1083560 +0154720 +1579801N +0826069 +0173721 -1353140N -1015243 -1200783 +0087748N +3049417 -0390967 +2375187C +2391837 +0322219 +1443840C -1873475 +1480409 -1035591C -1680503 +1363905 +1720420C +0214436 +2745530 +0280723C +1706272 +0862469 -2074220C +2574361 +0255279 -2988929C +2526356 -1108291 -3160208C +1599940 -1865849 -2419421C +0758442 -1176405 -1522106C -0210013 -1902512 -0757518C -0306620 -3301951 -0900819C -1274801 -3972735 -0130341C -2085723 -3250323 +0713069C -1927354 -1862165 +0793779C +1482435 -3287446 -2540211C +0569818 -3976667 -1809860C +2127013 -1052594 +3150384C +0906737 -0706002 +2650246O -2683800 +1787640 -1795683O -2385084 +1588355 +2605706O +0670184 +3805015 +0297671H +1731334 +1931761 -1922021H +3269949 +0869587 -3542277H -2841430 -3730098 +1318181H -2553912 -1276930 +1451152H +2140017 -3800678 -3229811H +0484408 -5051428 -1903805H +3188740 -1606081 -3856424H -1371662 -5047534 -0211074H +4052106 -0430539 +2478352H -0069062 -1016679 +2977964H +2880599 +0929112 +0703190H +2412735 -1692893 +3965231

38[Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Re -0506387 +0945561 +0234076N +1079472 +0145452 +1563853N +0827178 +0166913 -1343083N -1004040 -1199665 +0089193N +3043709 -0394781 +2360887C +2389012 +0316952 +1429217C -1870502 +1487578 -1021487C -1673956 +1368340 +1711148C +0202020 +2739241 +0279311C +1705973 +0861594 -2063586C +2573862 +0257139 -2978911C +2531259 -1106830 -3153076C +1607459 -1869331 -2414337C +0765507 -1183923 -1516787C -0201687 -1908345 -0754692C -0302877 -3305933 -0897471C -1275852 -3970960 -0128166C -2085771 -3243021 +0712346C -1922137 -1856466 +0795163C +1489077 -3291074 -2535055C +0574681 -3980251 -1806031C +2121667 -1057774 +3135889C +0901452 -0716211 +2634818O -2687028 +1801263 -1780745O -2380684 +1594721 +2601541O +0657251 +3805167 +0293658H +1724983 +1929791 -1906323H +3267444 +0874551 -3531043H -2845025 -3718920 +1315836H -2544361 -1265087 +1450382H +2147055 -3804762 -3223814H +0488990 -5054833 -1900913H +3196140 -1600125 -3849971H -1377901 -5045326 -0207013H +4046379 -0432359 +2465782H -0075648 -1025659 +2958531H +2873471 +0926337 +0688377H +2407868 -1696657 +3951475

47

77[Ru(phen)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 +1153207N -1031338 -1047808 +2649192C -0459450 -2248875 +2956082C +0707296 -2620931 +2224543C +1341410 -3850821 +2484940C +2485701 -4165133 +1727986C +2929791 -3273130 +0778125C +2244192 -2068550 +0582564N +1162331 -1740342 +1285729C +0796574 -4708061 +3495243C -0313184 -4352633 +4193480C -0978265 -3108682 +3942920C -2133506 -2688488 +4628767C -2699923 -1474391 +4312043C -2121881 -0677318 +3316952N +1041191 +0825410 -0462362C +2083002 +1661157 -0412379C +2699562 +2148879 -1561623C +2227863 +1766695 -2801952C +1133060 +0897451 -2877589C +0563217 +0444794 -4145018N +1104715 +0869872 -5273634C +0563594 +0442520 -6432045C -0563594 -0442520 -6432045N -1104715 -0869872 -5273634C -0563217 -0444794 -4145018C -1133060 -0897451 -2877589C -2227863 -1766695 -2801952C -2699562 -2148879 -1561623C -2083002 -1661157 -0412379N -1041191 -0825410 -0462362C -0565478 -0449272 -1680022C +0565478 +0449272 -1680022C -1111763 -0869723 -7668505C -0559539 -0437208 -8844227C +0559539 +0437208 -8844227C +1111763 +0869723 -7668505N +1031338 +1047808 +2649192C +2121881 +0677318 +3316952C +2699923 +1474391 +4312043C +2133506 +2688488 +4628767H +2563877 +3320886 +5394200C +0978265 +3108682 +3942920C +0459450 +2248875 +2956082C -0707296 +2620931 +2224543N -1162331 +1740342 +1285729C -2244192 +2068550 +0582564C -2929791 +3273130 +0778125C -2485701 +4165133 +1727986H -3001873 +5100898 +1898163C -1341410 +3850821 +2484940C -0796574 +4708061 +3495243C +0313184 +4352633 +4193480H +3001873 -5100898 +1898163H -2563877 -3320886 +5394200H -2550518 +0278490 +3052723H -3587197 -1119833 +4816894H -0717956 -5007062 +4954685H +1290989 -5650894 +3690280H +3803419 -3481883 +0177221H +2578921 -1353473 -0154691H +2550518 -0278490 +3052723H +3587197 +1119833 +4816894H +0717956 +5007062 +4954685H -1290989 +5650894 +3690280H -3803419 +3481883 +0177221H -2578921 +1353473 -0154691H +2430679 +1941183 +0570879H +3540925 +2819938 -1465123H +2686992 +2126740 -3710875H +1964057 +1536925 -7651679H +0975769 +0762037 -9789185H -0975769 -0762037 -9789185H -1964057 -1536925 -7651679H -2686992 -2126740 -3710875H -3540925 -2819938 -1465123H -2430679 -1941183 +0570879

73[Ru(tap)2(dppz)]2+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Ru +0000000 +0000000 -1158577N +1162983 -1734480 -1265064C +0689890 -2629635 -2176146C -0465272 -2269047 -2912355N -1031573 -1058556 -2647624C -2109435 -0737499 -3350222C -2630726 -1622276 -4315096N -2100512 -2801593 -4579794C -0997323 -3145608 -3873239C -0351786 -4407422 -4081553C +0753130 -4756144 -3369636C +1310594 -3871908 -2390238N +2412045 -4219967 -1683019C +2853229 -3341100 -0802498C +2239581 -2092991 -0578877H -2576239 +0216879 -3158425H -3512946 -1329181 -4869450H -0772548 -5073014 -4823123H +1240821 -5708943 -3525241H +3732157 -3601276 -0226859H +2631836 -1400843 +0150716N -1162983 +1734480 -1265064C -0689890 +2629635 -2176146C +0465272 +2269047 -2912355N +1031573 +1058556 -2647624C +2109435 +0737499 -3350222C +2630726 +1622276 -4315096N +2100512 +2801593 -4579794C +0997323 +3145608 -3873239C +0351786 +4407422 -4081553C -0753130 +4756144 -3369636C -1310594 +3871908 -2390238N -2412045 +4219967 -1683019C -2853229 +3341100 -0802498C -2239581 +2092991 -0578877H +2576239 -0216879 -3158425H +3512946 +1329181 -4869450H +0772548 +5073014 -4823123H -1240821 +5708943 -3525241H -3732157 +3601276 -0226859H -2631836 +1400843 +0150716N -1055470 -0810407 +0459583C -0572365 -0440016 +1675577C +0572365 +0440016 +1675577N +1055470 +0810407 +0459583C +2112156 +1625885 +0407501C +2737420 +2101291 +1557305C +2257332 +1727751 +2796205C +1147258 +0877836 +2872673C +0570228 +0435012 +4140040C -0570228 -0435012 +4140040C -1147258 -0877836 +2872673C -2257332 -1727751 +2796205C -2737420 -2101291 +1557305C -2112156 -1625885 +0407501N +1118484 +0852421 +5268068C +0570894 +0433580 +6426040C +1124571 +0853645 +7662534C +0565830 +0429186 +8837852C -0565830 -0429186 +8837852C -1124571 -0853645 +7662534C -0570894 -0433580 +6426040N -1118484 -0852421 +5268068H +2467692 +1899436 -0574400H +3592219 +2754809 +1460913H +2722567 +2079141 +3705410H +1986375 +1508481 +7645916H +0986545 +0747821 +9782939H -0986545 -0747821 +9782939H -1986375 -1508481 +7645916H -2722567 -2079141 +3705410H -3592219 -2754809 +1460913H -2467692 -1899436 -0574400

45

49[Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Re -0037760 -0172581 +0000000N -0314508 +1557127 +1333112N -0314508 +1557127 -1333112C -1907856 -0659416 +0000000C +0341701 -1495220 -1352453C +0341701 -1495220 +1352453C -0396602 +1517080 +2663900C -0358827 +2666020 +3446023C -0220325 +3894692 +2835086C -0155383 +3960603 +1438957C -0224326 +2763420 +0722029C -0224326 +2763420 -0722029C -0155383 +3960603 -1438957C -0220325 +3894692 -2835086C -0358827 +2666020 -3446023C -0396602 +1517080 -2663900C -0010350 +5218975 +0714943C -0010350 +5218975 -0714943O -3029255 -0935997 +0000000O +0578972 -2265930 -2181036O +0578972 -2265930 +2181036H -0479351 +0539285 +3109806H -0424617 +2577492 +4518405H -0424617 +2577492 -4518405H -0479351 +0539285 -3109806H -0166316 +4803703 +3412838H -0166316 +4803703 -3412838N +0128994 +6337138 +1403250N +0128994 +6337138 -1403250C +0278319 +7483599 -0716852C +0278319 +7483599 +0716852C +0445140 +8707766 -1411275H +0444805 +8690836 -2491751C +0445140 +8707766 +1411275H +0444805 +8690836 +2491751C +0604950 +9871211 -0709972H +0734907 +10805655 -1236594C +0604950 +9871211 +0709972H +0734907 +10805655 +1236594C +2696074 +0904680 +1152995C +3935047 +1518525 +1193811C +4567569 +1841454 +0000000H +5531840 +2328977 +0000000C +3935047 +1518525 -1193811H +4386297 +1738648 -2149061N +2067935 +0608063 +0000000C +2696074 +0904680 -1152995H +2180709 +0646260 -2064653H +4386297 +1738648 +2149061H +2180709 +0646260 +2064653

38[Mn(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Mn -0462641 +0871149 +0224406N +1032095 +0168187 +1521057N +0802574 +0210318 -1296362N -1002827 -1137193 +0115222N +2993137 -0287769 +2384035C +2337150 +0366533 +1408314C -1738897 +1346945 -0984395C -1561503 +1266749 +1620727C +0215787 +2559161 +0274183C +1672748 +0912303 -2015349C +2532013 +0321489 -2951058C +2484719 -1038934 -3151352C +1564967 -1809811 -2416050C +0739136 -1132201 -1498199C -0226393 -1855415 -0738085C -0349226 -3249123 -0898282C -1327260 -3905777 -0127931C -2116028 -3168942 +0725202C -1926241 -1784057 +0818234C +1428653 -3229054 -2554389C +0512925 -3918908 -1826026C +2070487 -0940823 +3166428C +0853881 -0649365 +2623097O -2542254 +1637373 -1754394O -2256798 +1518994 +2502283O +0652345 +3623094 +0311633H +1701827 +1978439 -1842996H +3222327 +0947471 -3498149H -2879838 -3635584 +1330589H -2536316 -1192121 +1484891H +2073350 -3741322 -3256858H +0414471 -4990953 -1937411H +3141268 -1520786 -3864136H -1450487 -4977328 -0215314H +3994011 -0296089 +2509353H -0120792 -0973916 +2939776H +2825164 +0954526 +0652517H +2353195 -1539690 +4013220

46

38[Tc(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Tc -0504419 +0943061 +0234166N +1083560 +0154720 +1579801N +0826069 +0173721 -1353140N -1015243 -1200783 +0087748N +3049417 -0390967 +2375187C +2391837 +0322219 +1443840C -1873475 +1480409 -1035591C -1680503 +1363905 +1720420C +0214436 +2745530 +0280723C +1706272 +0862469 -2074220C +2574361 +0255279 -2988929C +2526356 -1108291 -3160208C +1599940 -1865849 -2419421C +0758442 -1176405 -1522106C -0210013 -1902512 -0757518C -0306620 -3301951 -0900819C -1274801 -3972735 -0130341C -2085723 -3250323 +0713069C -1927354 -1862165 +0793779C +1482435 -3287446 -2540211C +0569818 -3976667 -1809860C +2127013 -1052594 +3150384C +0906737 -0706002 +2650246O -2683800 +1787640 -1795683O -2385084 +1588355 +2605706O +0670184 +3805015 +0297671H +1731334 +1931761 -1922021H +3269949 +0869587 -3542277H -2841430 -3730098 +1318181H -2553912 -1276930 +1451152H +2140017 -3800678 -3229811H +0484408 -5051428 -1903805H +3188740 -1606081 -3856424H -1371662 -5047534 -0211074H +4052106 -0430539 +2478352H -0069062 -1016679 +2977964H +2880599 +0929112 +0703190H +2412735 -1692893 +3965231

38[Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Re -0506387 +0945561 +0234076N +1079472 +0145452 +1563853N +0827178 +0166913 -1343083N -1004040 -1199665 +0089193N +3043709 -0394781 +2360887C +2389012 +0316952 +1429217C -1870502 +1487578 -1021487C -1673956 +1368340 +1711148C +0202020 +2739241 +0279311C +1705973 +0861594 -2063586C +2573862 +0257139 -2978911C +2531259 -1106830 -3153076C +1607459 -1869331 -2414337C +0765507 -1183923 -1516787C -0201687 -1908345 -0754692C -0302877 -3305933 -0897471C -1275852 -3970960 -0128166C -2085771 -3243021 +0712346C -1922137 -1856466 +0795163C +1489077 -3291074 -2535055C +0574681 -3980251 -1806031C +2121667 -1057774 +3135889C +0901452 -0716211 +2634818O -2687028 +1801263 -1780745O -2380684 +1594721 +2601541O +0657251 +3805167 +0293658H +1724983 +1929791 -1906323H +3267444 +0874551 -3531043H -2845025 -3718920 +1315836H -2544361 -1265087 +1450382H +2147055 -3804762 -3223814H +0488990 -5054833 -1900913H +3196140 -1600125 -3849971H -1377901 -5045326 -0207013H +4046379 -0432359 +2465782H -0075648 -1025659 +2958531H +2873471 +0926337 +0688377H +2407868 -1696657 +3951475

47

49[Re(CO)3(py)(dppz)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Re -0037760 -0172581 +0000000N -0314508 +1557127 +1333112N -0314508 +1557127 -1333112C -1907856 -0659416 +0000000C +0341701 -1495220 -1352453C +0341701 -1495220 +1352453C -0396602 +1517080 +2663900C -0358827 +2666020 +3446023C -0220325 +3894692 +2835086C -0155383 +3960603 +1438957C -0224326 +2763420 +0722029C -0224326 +2763420 -0722029C -0155383 +3960603 -1438957C -0220325 +3894692 -2835086C -0358827 +2666020 -3446023C -0396602 +1517080 -2663900C -0010350 +5218975 +0714943C -0010350 +5218975 -0714943O -3029255 -0935997 +0000000O +0578972 -2265930 -2181036O +0578972 -2265930 +2181036H -0479351 +0539285 +3109806H -0424617 +2577492 +4518405H -0424617 +2577492 -4518405H -0479351 +0539285 -3109806H -0166316 +4803703 +3412838H -0166316 +4803703 -3412838N +0128994 +6337138 +1403250N +0128994 +6337138 -1403250C +0278319 +7483599 -0716852C +0278319 +7483599 +0716852C +0445140 +8707766 -1411275H +0444805 +8690836 -2491751C +0445140 +8707766 +1411275H +0444805 +8690836 +2491751C +0604950 +9871211 -0709972H +0734907 +10805655 -1236594C +0604950 +9871211 +0709972H +0734907 +10805655 +1236594C +2696074 +0904680 +1152995C +3935047 +1518525 +1193811C +4567569 +1841454 +0000000H +5531840 +2328977 +0000000C +3935047 +1518525 -1193811H +4386297 +1738648 -2149061N +2067935 +0608063 +0000000C +2696074 +0904680 -1152995H +2180709 +0646260 -2064653H +4386297 +1738648 +2149061H +2180709 +0646260 +2064653

38[Mn(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Mn -0462641 +0871149 +0224406N +1032095 +0168187 +1521057N +0802574 +0210318 -1296362N -1002827 -1137193 +0115222N +2993137 -0287769 +2384035C +2337150 +0366533 +1408314C -1738897 +1346945 -0984395C -1561503 +1266749 +1620727C +0215787 +2559161 +0274183C +1672748 +0912303 -2015349C +2532013 +0321489 -2951058C +2484719 -1038934 -3151352C +1564967 -1809811 -2416050C +0739136 -1132201 -1498199C -0226393 -1855415 -0738085C -0349226 -3249123 -0898282C -1327260 -3905777 -0127931C -2116028 -3168942 +0725202C -1926241 -1784057 +0818234C +1428653 -3229054 -2554389C +0512925 -3918908 -1826026C +2070487 -0940823 +3166428C +0853881 -0649365 +2623097O -2542254 +1637373 -1754394O -2256798 +1518994 +2502283O +0652345 +3623094 +0311633H +1701827 +1978439 -1842996H +3222327 +0947471 -3498149H -2879838 -3635584 +1330589H -2536316 -1192121 +1484891H +2073350 -3741322 -3256858H +0414471 -4990953 -1937411H +3141268 -1520786 -3864136H -1450487 -4977328 -0215314H +3994011 -0296089 +2509353H -0120792 -0973916 +2939776H +2825164 +0954526 +0652517H +2353195 -1539690 +4013220

46

38[Tc(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Tc -0504419 +0943061 +0234166N +1083560 +0154720 +1579801N +0826069 +0173721 -1353140N -1015243 -1200783 +0087748N +3049417 -0390967 +2375187C +2391837 +0322219 +1443840C -1873475 +1480409 -1035591C -1680503 +1363905 +1720420C +0214436 +2745530 +0280723C +1706272 +0862469 -2074220C +2574361 +0255279 -2988929C +2526356 -1108291 -3160208C +1599940 -1865849 -2419421C +0758442 -1176405 -1522106C -0210013 -1902512 -0757518C -0306620 -3301951 -0900819C -1274801 -3972735 -0130341C -2085723 -3250323 +0713069C -1927354 -1862165 +0793779C +1482435 -3287446 -2540211C +0569818 -3976667 -1809860C +2127013 -1052594 +3150384C +0906737 -0706002 +2650246O -2683800 +1787640 -1795683O -2385084 +1588355 +2605706O +0670184 +3805015 +0297671H +1731334 +1931761 -1922021H +3269949 +0869587 -3542277H -2841430 -3730098 +1318181H -2553912 -1276930 +1451152H +2140017 -3800678 -3229811H +0484408 -5051428 -1903805H +3188740 -1606081 -3856424H -1371662 -5047534 -0211074H +4052106 -0430539 +2478352H -0069062 -1016679 +2977964H +2880599 +0929112 +0703190H +2412735 -1692893 +3965231

38[Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Re -0506387 +0945561 +0234076N +1079472 +0145452 +1563853N +0827178 +0166913 -1343083N -1004040 -1199665 +0089193N +3043709 -0394781 +2360887C +2389012 +0316952 +1429217C -1870502 +1487578 -1021487C -1673956 +1368340 +1711148C +0202020 +2739241 +0279311C +1705973 +0861594 -2063586C +2573862 +0257139 -2978911C +2531259 -1106830 -3153076C +1607459 -1869331 -2414337C +0765507 -1183923 -1516787C -0201687 -1908345 -0754692C -0302877 -3305933 -0897471C -1275852 -3970960 -0128166C -2085771 -3243021 +0712346C -1922137 -1856466 +0795163C +1489077 -3291074 -2535055C +0574681 -3980251 -1806031C +2121667 -1057774 +3135889C +0901452 -0716211 +2634818O -2687028 +1801263 -1780745O -2380684 +1594721 +2601541O +0657251 +3805167 +0293658H +1724983 +1929791 -1906323H +3267444 +0874551 -3531043H -2845025 -3718920 +1315836H -2544361 -1265087 +1450382H +2147055 -3804762 -3223814H +0488990 -5054833 -1900913H +3196140 -1600125 -3849971H -1377901 -5045326 -0207013H +4046379 -0432359 +2465782H -0075648 -1025659 +2958531H +2873471 +0926337 +0688377H +2407868 -1696657 +3951475

47

38[Tc(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Tc -0504419 +0943061 +0234166N +1083560 +0154720 +1579801N +0826069 +0173721 -1353140N -1015243 -1200783 +0087748N +3049417 -0390967 +2375187C +2391837 +0322219 +1443840C -1873475 +1480409 -1035591C -1680503 +1363905 +1720420C +0214436 +2745530 +0280723C +1706272 +0862469 -2074220C +2574361 +0255279 -2988929C +2526356 -1108291 -3160208C +1599940 -1865849 -2419421C +0758442 -1176405 -1522106C -0210013 -1902512 -0757518C -0306620 -3301951 -0900819C -1274801 -3972735 -0130341C -2085723 -3250323 +0713069C -1927354 -1862165 +0793779C +1482435 -3287446 -2540211C +0569818 -3976667 -1809860C +2127013 -1052594 +3150384C +0906737 -0706002 +2650246O -2683800 +1787640 -1795683O -2385084 +1588355 +2605706O +0670184 +3805015 +0297671H +1731334 +1931761 -1922021H +3269949 +0869587 -3542277H -2841430 -3730098 +1318181H -2553912 -1276930 +1451152H +2140017 -3800678 -3229811H +0484408 -5051428 -1903805H +3188740 -1606081 -3856424H -1371662 -5047534 -0211074H +4052106 -0430539 +2478352H -0069062 -1016679 +2977964H +2880599 +0929112 +0703190H +2412735 -1692893 +3965231

38[Re(CO)3(im)(phen)]+ S0 min (B3LYPTZP)Re -0506387 +0945561 +0234076N +1079472 +0145452 +1563853N +0827178 +0166913 -1343083N -1004040 -1199665 +0089193N +3043709 -0394781 +2360887C +2389012 +0316952 +1429217C -1870502 +1487578 -1021487C -1673956 +1368340 +1711148C +0202020 +2739241 +0279311C +1705973 +0861594 -2063586C +2573862 +0257139 -2978911C +2531259 -1106830 -3153076C +1607459 -1869331 -2414337C +0765507 -1183923 -1516787C -0201687 -1908345 -0754692C -0302877 -3305933 -0897471C -1275852 -3970960 -0128166C -2085771 -3243021 +0712346C -1922137 -1856466 +0795163C +1489077 -3291074 -2535055C +0574681 -3980251 -1806031C +2121667 -1057774 +3135889C +0901452 -0716211 +2634818O -2687028 +1801263 -1780745O -2380684 +1594721 +2601541O +0657251 +3805167 +0293658H +1724983 +1929791 -1906323H +3267444 +0874551 -3531043H -2845025 -3718920 +1315836H -2544361 -1265087 +1450382H +2147055 -3804762 -3223814H +0488990 -5054833 -1900913H +3196140 -1600125 -3849971H -1377901 -5045326 -0207013H +4046379 -0432359 +2465782H -0075648 -1025659 +2958531H +2873471 +0926337 +0688377H +2407868 -1696657 +3951475

47