COP Training

COP Training Part 1-1Cop history UNFCCC(UNFCCC, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) , 1992 6 , 178 154 1994 3 21 , 156

( / ) ,

, , (COP) 2. , Annex I, Annex II, Non-Annex I , .Annex I 1990 ( )Annex II

UNFCCC

Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI) - to give advice to the COP on all matters concerning the implementation of the Convention- to examine the information in the national communications and emission inventories submitted by Parties in order to assess the Conventions overall effectiveness.Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) - to provide the COP with advice on scientific, technological and methodological matters- link between the scientific information provided by expert sources and the policy-oriented needs of the COP

Cop 1,2,31995 COP 1The Berlin mandate2000Developed vs. developingBody for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA)Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI).

COP3 2000 91996 COP 2Swiss, GenevaIntergovenmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Flexibility = rejection of uniform harmonized policies

101997 COP 3The Kyoto Protocol on Climate ChangeAnnex 1 Parties : 2008 12 1990 5%( 6%, 7%, (EU) 8%) , , ( )

- The United States would be required to reduce its total emissions an average of 7% below 1990 levels; however Congress did not ratify the treaty after Clinton signed it. The Bush administration explicitly rejected the protocol in 2001.

11Cop4,5Cop 6,7COP 6 2000.10 , - .-, , , EU .- , - .- 2002 COP6-bis () - 2001.07 (Bonn Agreement )- , - COP 7 2001.11 Bonn (Marrakech Accords): - -

Cop 8,9COP82002New Delhi, India

1. Adopt Delhi Ministerial DeclarationEmphasis on Sustainable Development- parties should promote sustainable development-in water, energy, health, agriculture and biodiversity area- Build on the outcomes to World Summit on Sustainable DevelopmentThe Delhi Ministerial Declaration On Climate Change and Sustainable Development, Unfccc.intAdaptation begins to be considered as important as Mitigation-developing countries, small island countries become more vulnerable to the impact of c.c-effective and result-based should be supported under Marrachesh AccordsEmphasis on Technology-develop clean and energy efficient technology2. Russias hesitation Russia's agreement (17% of global emissions in 1990) was required to meet the ratification criteria. But Russia hesitated saying that they need a time to think it over.

http://www.nature.com/climate/timeline/icp/index.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_ProtocolCOP92003Millan, Italy

Decided on definitions and modalities for including afforestation and reforestation activities under the CDM- New emission reporting guidelines based on the good-practice guidance provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change were adopted to provide a sound and reliable foundation for reporting on changes in carbon concentrations resulting from land-use changes and forestry.

-the agreement on the modalities and scope for carbon absorbing forest-management projects in the clean development mechanism (CDM). This agreement completes the package adopted in Marrakesh two years ago and expands the CDM to an additional area of activity

2. SCCF(the Special Climate Change Fund) and LDC(The Least Develpoed Countries) fund

- Two funds were further developed, the Special Climate Change Fund and the Least Developed Countries Fund, which will support technology transfer, adaptation projects and other activities.

http://www.thegef.org/gef/SCCFAdaptation and TechnologyCop 18,19Cop 18 , 19 Cop 18 , ( ) 2012. 11. 26. ~ 12. 8, * 12.7() 18:00 12.8() 21:50 () 195 , NGO 1 *

Cop 18 (20 ) 2015 2012

2012

,

Cop 18 2 ,

Cop 18 1 2013.1.1~2020.12.31 2020 1990 25~40% , 2014 Cf) I : 1

2 5(2008~2012)

8(2013~2020) 37 - (1) : 37 - (4) : , , ,

1990 5.2%( 8% ~ +10% )

1990 20% (2014 )

() 3(2010~2012) 300 () 2020 1000() 3(2013~2015) () 2020 1000

Cop 18 2 2020 2020 2013~2015 2 2015.5 - 2013.3.1 2020 , , - () , ( ) (SBSTA) () 2013 - () 2 (narrow scope) - () , , (wide scope) Cop 18 3 2020 1,000 (pathways) 19 (welcomes and endorses), GCF Cop 18 4 2013 COP19 .- , " " , 2020 100 "(encourage)"

Cop 18 5 : 13.11.11()23()(: 11.19-22), 11.22() , 1 11.23() (194 47), (100), NGO (35), (1000) 1 - , , 4 (, , , )

- : , , , , , , , , , , , - : ( ), ( ),

Cop 19 , Pre-2020 Post-2020 (LDM)

Cop 19 2020 2015 2020 1 COP20 GCF

Cop 19 1 ( 08 -12) 2 ( 13 - 20) COP18 ( ) ,

3/4 144 , , , ,

90 25% 05 3.8% , ,

Cop 19 12020 (contribution) 2020 ( )2014 (2015 agreement) * COP20(14) ADP ADP(Ad-hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action, ) : 2020 2020

Cop 19 2 : * * : - R&D - ,

Cop 19 3 () , , COP , - 1 () CAF , 22 (COP22, 16) (review)

Cop 19 4 REDD+* 05 (REDD+) REDD+(Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation plus conservation) : (ICA*) (TTE**) * ICA(International Consultation and Analysis) : ** TTE(Team of Technical Experts) : ICA Cop 19 5 1 (CGE*) CGE ICA , ICA , CGE 5 18 * CGE(Consultative Group of Experts):

Cop 19 5 GCF (guidance*) * COP-GCF (arrangement) COP GCF (under the guidance of the COP), GCF COP ( ) COP20 GCF GCF COP20 , GCF

Cop 19 6~