di herculis apsidal motion

8/9/2019 DI Herculis Apsidal motion

1/6

Harvard Smithsonian Center for recycled astrophysics fraud and stupidity

The Case for DI Herculis Binary Stars System

Introduction: The stupidity and fraud of Harvard physics and Astrophysics

department is legendary. Binary stars motion that ended Einsteins relativityas garbage and reduced Harvard physics department and astrophysicsdepartment to micro size had been solved in 1969 by a 5 th grader in BeirutLebanon. For 40 years and 100 articles about DI Herculis binary starssystem all publically funded Harvard still loot money for a problem that hadbeen solved exposing the nature of University and # 1 in academia fraudby top ten American and western Universities and Harvard Smithsonian isthe spear of fraud because it is a shameless 40 years of active recycledfraud. Now in 2010 and 40 years after a 5th grader beats Harvard Professorsthe 5th grader solution is presented again as a reply to Harvard

Smithsonian 2010 article by Torres of Harvard Smithsonian for recyclesastrophysics fraud and other DI Herculis Fraud that came out from MITVillanova and others. I am not saying Harvard academia is fraud but I amhanding the proof that they are # 1 in fraud.

Einsteins stupidity exposed by a 5th grader with unprecedentedaccuracy.With = 2 f = 2 /T angular frequency in event timeAnd (real time) = (event time) + = (real time) - (event time)

= 2 f [v* (e) +/- v (e)] / [v* (m) +/- v (m)]= 2 f Z; Z = [v* (e) +/- v (e)] / [v* (m) +/- v (m)] = red shift

And = 2 f (1 + Z)The Advance of Perihelion of Planet Mercury is 2 f Z = 2 Z/ T = (2 /T) [v* (e) +/- v (e)] / [v* (m) +/- v (m)]In arc seconds per century: Multiply by: (180/) [36526/T (days)] (3600)And = [2 / T (seconds)] [v*(e) +/- v (e)] / [v* (m) +/- v(m)] x (180/) [36526/T (days)] (3600);T (seconds) = T days x 24x 3600 = [2 / T days x 24x 3600] [v*(e) +/- v (e)] / [v* (m) +/- v (m)] x(180/) [36526/T (days)] (3600) = [15 x 36526 / T (days)] [v*(e) +/- v (e)] / [v* (m) +/- v (m)]With Z = (29.8 0.465)/ (48.2) =29.335/48.2; T = 88 days = 15 (36526/ 88) (29.335/48.2) = [547890/88] (29.335/48.2)= 43

MIT and Villanova University recycled fraud exposed withunprecedented accuracy


2/6

Abstract: Time bullying equation = t fits all Nobel Prize winnersexperimental data of relativity theory and quantum mechanics

We can not measure something that did not happen. We can onlymeasure something that had happened. We can measure something inpresent time that had happened in past time.Present time = present timePresent time = past time + [present time - past time]Present time = past time + time delaysReal time = event time + time delays

What we measure = what happened + what changed till things aremeasured.Real time physics = event time physics + time delays physicsWhat we see or measure is relativistic = Absolute event + relativistic

time delaysWhat happened is absolute = real time relativistic event - real timerelativistic effectsTheory = experiment - difference between theory and experiment

The Mistake isReal time = event timeExperiment = theory [this is the wrong idea that started space - timestupidity]

What are missing are time delays or corrections of data acquisitions orvisual effects

Real time = event time + time delays

This formula is my 1973 discovery that not only Nobel Prize winnersare wrong but all of physics and physicists are wrong because physicssolution is based on the idea that:Real time = event time is correct when it is wrong and the

correct idea isReal time = event time + time delays

= t + [ - t]

This addition operation can be a multiplicationOr, = t [/t]The definition of a visual Illusion time delay is

/t = cosine + sine = ; = arc tan (v/c)With v = relative velocity and c = velocity of light.

= t this formula is the magic sock of Physics or the Bullyequation


3/6

Real time = event time x Visual effects

= (x) + (y) = t = t [cosine + sine ] (x) = t cosine = t [1 - 2 sine (/2)] (x) - t = - 2 t sin {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}

= - 2 t sin {[arc tan (v/c)]/2}

= - 2 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine {[arc tan [(v +/-

v*)/c]/2} sec/ century = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine {[arc tan [(v +/-

v*)/c] /2} arc sec/century

Since idiots are idiots and some times 1/2 period scientists use insteadof a full period you would find many cases that two Astrophysicistsgive an answer and one double the other's answer like in the most

famous case in astronomy and that would be Dr Guinan of VillanovaUniversity with DI Herculis apsidal motion of 0.65 1985 and DRMartynov of 1.3 in 2008.

Earth velocity is 29.8 km/secVenus velocity is 35.1km/secMars velocity is 47.9 km/secDI Herculis is 103.5 km/sec

In case of mercury they use 1/2 cycle or use Venus orbit to calculateMercury because Mercury is closer to the sun and disappears morethan Venus and Venus is a bright planet that looks like a star.

Planet Distance r

X 106

km

Planet

Orbit T

Orbit

speed vinkm/sec

Less

Earthspeed

Spin

speedkm/sec

Angular

velocity;v/rarc sec/century

Mercury 58.2 88 47.9 18.1 .002 70.29Venus 108.2 224.7 35.05 5.7 6.52 10.86Earth 149.6 365.26 29.8 .46511 4.1Mars 227.936 687 24.14 0.2411Jupiter 778.412 4333 13.06 12.6Saturn 1,426.725 10760 9.65 9.87

Uranus 2,870.97 30690 6.80 2.59Neptune 4,498 60180 5.43 2.68Pluto 5906.4 90730 4.74


4/6

In the original calculation of 1859 the used 1/2 cycle because of theproximity of Mercury to the SUN

And = - 15x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine {[arc tan [(v - v*)/c]/2}arc sec/century

With v = 47.9 km/sec and v* = 29.8

= - 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine {arc tan [(47.9 -29.8)/c]/2} arc sec/century = 43.0 arc second per century

Then they later came and used Venus as reference for measuring andused full cycle because Venus look like a morning star and can be seenbetter

If t = 100 years and v = Orbital velocity of Mercury - Orbital velocityof Venus = - 2 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine [arc tan (47.9 -35.1/300,000)/2] sec

= - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine {[arc tan (47.9 -35.1/300,000)]/2}

= 43.0 arc per century for mercury.Venus is bright like a star and it is used to calculate Mercury's orbit.

If t = 100 years and v = Orbital velocity of Venus - Orbital velocity of

Earth

= - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine {[arc tan (35.1 - 29.8/300,000)]= 8.3 arc sec per century for Venus

Earth motion is used to calculate Venus' orbit.This same formula applies to stars = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine {arc tan [(v - v*)/c]/2}arc sec/century

DI HerculisIt all came from this equation and sometimes 1/2 the period = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine {{arc tan [(v - v*)/c]}/2} arsec/century

V* (p) = [GM/ (m + M) a] = 96.84 km/secV* (s) = [Gm/ (m + M) a] = 110.34km/sec


5/6

With v = [V* (p) + V* (s)]/2 = [96.84 + 110.34]/2=103.5887398km/secAnd v + v* = 103.5887398 + 29.8 = 133.3887398 = - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine {arc tan [(v - v*)/c]/2} arcsec/century

= - 2 x 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine {arc tan[(133.39)/300,000]/2} = - 2x15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 sine {arc tan [(133.39)/300,000]/2}arc sec/century

= 1.3 arc sec/centuryIn the 1/2 period method = - 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 x 3600 sine {arc tan [(v - v*)/c]/2} arcsec/century (degrees) = - 15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 sine {arc tan [(v - v*)/c]/2}arc sec/century

= 1.3 /2 = 0.65In the new Harvard fraud they changed the spin of the stars valuesfrom [45, 45] to [108, 116] a change of 8 km/sec

Since idiots are idiots looking at a star spin for 110 years history and40 years of research articles and have 250 % wrong measurementsand cat not tell the difference between a moving star motion and aspinning star motion there would be an 8 km/sec differences that is133.39 + 8 = 141.39 km/sec = - 2x15 x 365 26 x 23.933333 sine {arc tan [(141.39)/300,000]/2}arc sec/century

= 1.459 arc sec/centuryThe new numbers from 1985 to 2010 are 0.65 degrees / century to 1.454degrees /centuryGo to SAO/NASA: Type apsidal motion of DI Herculis

And see for yourself how a Lebanese 5th grader knocked Ein (one) steins(stone) and # 1 stupidity of Harvard

This is the mailing address of Harvard astrophysics department stupidityAnd the phone numbers to call and inform The Nobel physicists of Harvardabout their stupidity and fraud

CFA: Mailing Address

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics60 Garden StreetCambridge, MA 02138


6/6

Useful Phone Numbers

Public/Media Inquiries617-495-

7463

Administrative Office (Harvard College

Observatory)

617-495-

9059

Astronomy Department (Harvard University)617-495-

3752

Director's Office617-495-7100

Advancement and External Affairs Office617-495-

7321

Directory Assistance (Harvard)617-495-

1000

Directory Assistance (SAO)617-495-7000

Fellowship Program Office617-495-

7103

Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory520-670-

5701

Human Resources (HCO)617-495-1592

Human Resources (SAO)617-495-

7371

Library John G. Wolbach Library and InformationResource Center

617-496-5769

Minor Planet Center617-495-

7244

Photographic Plate Collection617-495-

3362

Public Affairs Office617-495-

7461

[email protected] all rights reserved
http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/adm/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/adm/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/ast/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/do/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/support/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/opportunities/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/facilities/flwo/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/hr/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/lib/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/mpc.htmlhttp://www.cfa.harvard.edu/hco/plates.htmlhttp://www.cfa.harvard.edu/press/mailto:[email protected]://www.cfa.harvard.edu/adm/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/adm/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/ast/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/do/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/support/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/opportunities/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/facilities/flwo/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/hr/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/lib/http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/mpc.htmlhttp://www.cfa.harvard.edu/hco/plates.htmlhttp://www.cfa.harvard.edu/press/mailto:[email protected]

di herculis apsidal motion

Documents