discussion of randal verbrugge’s: the puzzling divergence of aggregate rents and user costs,...
TRANSCRIPT
Discussion of Randal Verbrugge’s:
The Puzzling Divergence of Aggregate Rents and User Costs,
1978-2001
Leonard NakamuraFederal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia*
*My views, not the Fed’s
Back to basics
• Paper points out that because interest rates and asset prices are volatile, short-term real rates of return can vary substantially from real rental rates– This is certainly true– Applies to all long term assets, not just residences
• This paper is a useful reminder of what economists don’t understand– And a valuable challenge to economists
• I am not so sure that it puts statistical agencies in a quandary: Empirically, they should use rental equivalence– Rents are understood at least somewhat– User costs are (empirically) not
Owner occupied homes:costs and equivalent rents
• Stock of housing is large, and adjusts slowly• Households adjust their use of housing slowly
– Implied real stream of housing services must change only slowly
• User costs are too volatile compared to this shadow price– Not just true for housing – user costs of capital are too
volatile (Shiller)
Implication: real quantity of housing services changes slowly
• At the margin in equilibrium, the rent summarizes the information in the user cost.– Empirical question: are rents or user costs closer to the
truth?• Good evidence that rents are reasonable:
– Hedonic estimates (Crone et al, Kurz and Hoffman)– Rents and housing prices are cointegrated: J. Gallin,
BoG, Long horizon of house prices and rents• Real rents move with real net stock of residential fixed
assets– Ratio is relatively constant over past 60 years – Particularly if we adjust BLS residential rents for
response bias (Crone et al, CPI for rents, a case of understated inflation)
Minor problems in Verbrugge measure of user costs
• To get user cost right, very hard work• Risk premiums? Shouldn’t use deterministic model• Hard to measure:
– Expected appreciation :4 quarter horizon or 40 quarter horizon? – Relevant interest rate: Mortgage rate includes refinance option
• The exercise cost has changed over time• Type of mortgage used varies over time (ARMs when rates are
high)– Cost of maintenance and repairs
• These are minor problems in the sense they are very unlikely to influence the result
• User costs too volatile to know whether trend is right
Explaining rents
• Are rents related to theoretical variables?– Another valuable question
• Rents = β(user cost)– User costs are measured with error– β likely biased downwards
• Detached units rental rates not very reliable– Too many special cases– Possibly better to use regular rental units
• Also, adjust rent inflation rates for 1978-1985 a la Crone et al
Bottom line: a valuable and difficult line of research
• This is an important issue for economics: Residential assets very large share of total wealth
• How useful are rents to measure the shadow price of owner occupied housing services?
• Why are user costs so volatile?– Why don’t house prices appear to be martingales?
• What are the returns to owner-occupied housing and are they reasonable?– Is there a equity premium puzzle for housing
• Need stochastic GE model (Luengo-Prado, Nakajima)