: *7)

(Jiho Jang)

jhufs@hufs.ac.kr

. , ,

, , ,

,

.

,

. () .

. , ,

.

.

, , ,

* 2013

2013; 39(2)Journal of Social Science

Vol.39, No.2, 2013; 43-65

3

44 39 2

I.

70, 80

, .

.

.

. 90

. , ,

, 119 2 .

80 12

, 1986 12 .

, , , , ,

.

, ,

.

, , ,

,

.

.

. 5

? ,

. 1995 2006 30

. 20

. GDP ,

.

: 45

30

(: , , %)

/

/

1979 20.7 23.77 417 13.9 39.1 52.9 60.6

1986 56.6 84.9 509 16.4 100.2 56.5 84.7

1990 125.3 231.3 570 19.0 191.3 65.5 120.9

1994 233.4 345.0 623 20.8 349.9 66.7 98.6

1998 463.5 479.3 686 22.9 501.1 92.5 95.7

2 0 00

564.5 510.1 624 20.8 603.2 93.6 84.6

2005 770.0 629.4 645 21.5 865.2 89.0 72.7

2010 1460.5 1134.0 1019 34.0 1172.8 124.5 96.7

1: 2005 2: 30 4 ( ): ( 2012: 7 )

2005 5

,

( 2005 5 16).

. , ,

Mehta(2011)

5 ,

, , .

,

.

. Hall(1989)

. ,

.

.

()

46 39 2

.

.

.

.

. :

.

(Blyth, 2002; Hall and Soskice,

2001; Hay, 2001; Smith, 2006).

(Mahoney and Thelen, 2010).

Krasner(1988) (punctuated equilibrium) Lieberman(2002)

.

, .

(animating idea) (Offe,

2006). .

, ,

.

.

. .

.

.

(Beland and Cox, 2011),

Braun Busch(1999), Fischer(2003)

(Albrekt Larsen and Goul

Andersen, 2009; Seeleib-Kaiser and Fleckenstein, 2007; Stone, 2008; Stone, 2008; Weyland, 2005).

: 47

Rothstein(2005)

.

, , ,

. Berman(1998)

. Peters Pierre, King(2005)

80

.

. Mehta(2011)

.

.

.

,

.

.

.

. (assumption)

.

.

, , 3

(Hall, 1989).

.

.

.

.

.

Genieys Smyrl(2008)

. 80

48 39 2

.

, .

,

,

.

?

. (2008) (2009)

. (2008)

, (2009)

,

.

.

. (

, 2008).

( 2010).

(

2011).

.

.

1.

7%,

, , ,

6 .

: 49

, ,

. 2002 10 8

.

: (2003)

, ,

,

.

( 2003).

2

.

.

2003 2

.

50 39 2

. .

.

(

, 2009: 182-183).

()

(231)

1(64)

2(43)

3(37)

4(49)

5(38)

() 143 39 21 24 35 24

FTA( )

153 47 25 19 37 25

() 22 2 6 6 5 3

3 - 2 - 1

45 6 11 8 13 7

27 6 2 6 8 5

30 2 10 8 4 6

43 18 11 6 4 4

.

.

, ,

, 4 .

. 6 2003 8 2

.

(, 2010).

: 51

. . 5

.

, , . 5 231

22 . , ,

FTA, 153, , ,

143 . , ,

45, , , 43

.

1

,

. , , ,

.

.

. 5

. SK 03 4

238

.8)

2.

2 .

. (2007)

8) (2011), (2007), (2010) .

FTA, 2 , , . (2008: 65) . (2009) , .

52 39 2

( )03.2-03.12

,

( )04.1-04.6

( )04.6-06.5

( )06.6-06.6

( )06.7-07.8

.

, . (2009)

. , ,

, ,

.

(2008) , , ,

.

, ,

, , , ,

5

. .

: 53

( )07.9-08.2

( )03.2-05.1

( )05.1-06.11

( )06.11-07.7

( )07.8-07.12

&

( )03.2-04.1

( )04.1-05.2

( )

( )05.3-06.7

( ) 06.7-08.2

( )03.2-03.12

( )03.12-06.1

( )06.3-06.12

()

( )07.1-08.2

( )03.2-06.2

, LG, SK, , , 6

54 39 2

(04.11)

( )06.3-08.2

( )

( )03.3-04.7

( )04.8-07.7

()07.8-08.2

: , .

( 2003 2 28).

. 2003

, , 3

. 1

.

.

.

,

.

: 55

.

( 2005 713). 2006 10

. 10 6

4 ,

,

.

(

, 2009: 190-192).

,

, .

.

.

. 03 4 , ,

5

, ,

( , 2009: 181). (2004:

46-47) 1980

. 80

, 90 , ,

- .

1 . 1995 1 1 8

.

, 2004

56 39 2

(, 2011: 294).

( , 2009: 193).

. 1997

( , 2005). , ,

SK

(, 2005). (2003, 2004a,

2004b), (2004, 2005a, 2005b) (2004, 2005a, 2005b)

.

(

, 2004). ,

(

, 2009: 184-185).

.

.

. , ,

. (2008)

1993 0.3% , 1

23.9% , 1998 38.7%

36.3% .

. 2003 SK LG

.

(, 2011: 294). 3 (

2003.12.30) (

2004.1.2.) ( 2003.4.2., 2003.8.29)

1 , ,

: 57

04 07

. 6 10

2 ,

25% 40% , 100% 200%

(, 2011: 295).

.

(

, 2009: 192-193). 06

(2008) (2006)

.

V.

. 70 80

, 90

(Jang, 2003). 2000

.

.

.

.

.

, ,

. 1 (2004)

.

10 ? 2012

.

58 39 2

(

), (

)

.

.

.

,

, ,

13 ( 2012

10 14). (2012)

,

, ,

.

. .

SK

.

.

.

,

,

. 10

. 5

.

: 59

&

04.1-05.2

(2004). -, . 4.22.-

180 .

(2004). 2 . 3.24.- 2

2 , .

(2004). / 10.19.

- . . .

05.3-06.7

(2005). . 8.29.- 1980 2

, . 1998 336% 2004 114% .

06.3-06.12

(2006). , . 8.10.- () ,

, , .

03.2-06.2

(2003). . 12.18.-

(2004). , . 2.3.

- 1998 6 .

(2004). , . 2.24.-

. .

- 2 48 , .

60 39 2

(2004). - , - . 4.26.

- : 5 (18 378) 25% .

- 30% 0% .

- . , 3 , , . . 50% 30% .

(2004). . 5.23.

- (CEO) . CEO .

.(2005). , 33 . 7.24.

- 2 55 105

(2006). . 3.2.-

() .

- , , .

06.3-08.2

(2006). , ... . 12.17.

- () .

- 17 , 2 .

: 61

(2004 2 3), , .

(2012), , .

(2005 7 24), , 33 .

(2006 8 10), , .

(2003 4 2), .

(2003 8 29), , 11 .

(2004 4 22). -, .

(2005 5 16). , .

(2011), , , 14, 1, , pp.275-300.

(2004), 1 : , , 6, , pp.38-63.

(2010), , : .

(2009), : , : .

(2010), , : .

(2003), , 11

(2004a), , 1.

(2004b), M&A , 7.

(2003 12 18), .

(2004 5 23), .

(2012 9 17), .

(2008), , ().

(2003), M&A , 5.

(2005a), , 4.

(2005b), , 11.

(2003), , 16 .

(2007), , , 41, 1, , pp.57-79.

(2008), , , , .

62 39 2

(2004 11 25), ?.

(2007), , : , .

(2009), , , 8, 1, , pp.93-119.

(2006), , , .

(2008), : , , , pp.241-259.

(2010), : , .

(2005), , .

(2004), , 12.

(2005a), M&A , 3.

(2005b), M&A : M&A , 11.

(2008), : , , 16, 2, , pp.9-42.

(2009), , , 43, 3, , pp.127-150.

(2003 12 30), 3 .

(2004 1 2), .

(2012 10 14), - .

(2011), , .

(2005), .

(2009), 5: , .

(2003 2 28), / / .

(2005 7 13), No .

(2006 3 2), .

(2006 12 17), , ... .

(2004 2 24), , .

(2004 4 26), - , - .

: 63

(2005), .

(2004 3 24), 2 .

(2005 8 29), .

(2008), : , .

(2004 10 19), .

Albrekt Larsen, Christian, and Jorgen Goul Andersen.(2009), How New Economic Ideas Changed the Danish Welfare State: The Case of Neoliberal Ideas and Highly Organied Social Democratic Interests, Governance, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp.239-261.

Beland, Daniel and Robert H. Cox.(2011), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Berman. Sheri.(1998), The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making on Interwar Europe, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Braun, Dietmar and Andreas Busch.(1999), Public Policy and Political Ideas, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Fischer, Frank.(2003), Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Genieys, William and Mars Smyrl.(2008), Elites, Ideas, and the Evolution of Public Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hall.(1989), The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice, eds.(2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundation of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hay, Colin.(2001), The Crisis of Keynesianism and the Rise of Neoliberalism in Britain: An Ideational Institutionalist Approach, in John C. Campbell and Ove K. Pedersen(ed.), The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp.193-218.

Jang, Jiho(2003), Persistence of Interlocking Institutions: Big Business Policy under the Kim Dae Jung Government, Asia Pacific, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.10-16.

Krasner, Stephen D.(1988), Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective, Comparative Political Science, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp.66-94.

Lieberman, Evan. S.(2002), Ideas, Institutions and Political Order: Explaining Political Change, American Political Science Review, Vol. 96, No. 4, pp.697-712.

Mahoney, James, and Kathleen Thelen.(2010), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, New York: Cambridge University Press.

64 39 2

Mehta, Jal.(2011), The Varied Roles of Ideas in Politics: From Whether to How, in Daniel Beland and Robert H. Cox.(ed.), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.23-46.

Offe, Claus.(2006), Political Institutions and Social Power: Conceptual Explorations, in Ian Sapiro, Stephen Skowronek, and Daniel Galvin.(ed.), Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State, New York: New York University Press, pp.91-113.

Peters, Guy, Jon Pierre, and Desmond King.(2005), The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism, Journal of Politics, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp.1275-1300.

Rothstein.(2005), Social Traps and the Problem of Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin, and Timo Fleckenstein.(2007), Discourse, Learning and Welfare State Change: The Case of German Labour Market Reforms, Social Policy and Administration, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp.427-448.

Smith, Rogers. M.(2006), Which Comes First, the Ideas or the Institutions? in Ian Sapiro, Stephen Skowronek, and Daniel Galvin,(ed.), Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State, New York: New York University Press, pp.91-113.

Stone, Diane.(2008), Global Public Policy, Transnational Policy Communities, and Their Networks, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 36, No.1, pp.19-38.

Weyland, Kurt.(2005), Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons form Latin American Pension Reform, World Politics, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp.262-295.

: 65

Failure of Roh Governments Chaebol Reform Policy Ideas

Jiho JangHankuk University of Foreign Studies Department of Public Administration

Associate Professor

ABSTRACT

This article examines policy idea of chaebol reform under the Roh government.

Classified as a public discourse, policy problems, and the solution to the problem,

Cheabol reforming ideas are examined based on presidential speech, press

releases, interviews, message. Also policy feasibility, administrative feasibility, and

political feasibility are explored by press releases of senior officials of the relevant

ministries. Finally chaebols anti-reforms ideas are investigated. The study finds

failure of Roh governments chaebol reform. The government did not suggest any

specific ideas public discourse and policy issues, let alone the solution to the

problem. Without reform ideas and feasible programs the Roh government was

captured by interests of chaebols and bureaucrats.

Key WordsChaebol reform, Roh government, policy idea, policy

feasibility

Received May 16 , 2013Revised August 06, 2013Accepted August 19 , 2013