espen opedal

16
EA 2015 - Business and IT Alignment. Onsdag den 4. november 2015 Alignment af Business and IT Espen Opedal, CIO, TRYG

Upload: dansk-it

Post on 09-Feb-2017

497 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

EA 2015 - Business and IT Alignment.Onsdag den 4. november 2015

Alignment af Business and ITEspen Opedal, CIO, TRYG

2

Alignment of Business & IT

4th of November 2015Espen Opedal, CIO Tryg

Agenda

May 1, 20233

1. Tryg og Tryg IT

2. EA og kontaktflade til Forretning

3. Ny model for mere rettidig brug af ny teknologi

4. Enkel checkliste for styring af IT Arkitekturen

5. Øget involvering af partnere

May 1, 20234

1.1 Aiming for world class

1.2 Tryg Strategy 2015 - 2017

1 maj 20235

1.3 Tryg IT Main Focus Areas

6 November 2014

7

1.4 One Key-challenge : Complexity

November 2014

Business complexity

IT-complexity

Geographical setup

Consequences• Operational instability• Reduced time to market• Increased development

and test costs• Complex competence

mapping• High software costs

Actions• Decrease business

complexity• Reduce IT complexity• Long term IT-strategy• Sourcing• Select domain specific

vendors

1.5 Working with Architecture Domains

Used for• Classification of

solutions• Selection of focus areas• Selection of vendors

and partners• TCO, and much more

2.1 Ny Enterprise Architecture placering

• Fra stabsfunktion til linje organisation, og nu i frontlinjen. • Enterprise arkitekter er aktive deltagere i initiering af projektet.• CIO og EA Direktør holder BRM–møder og Road shows, sammen • Tryg IT har Enterprise Architects – vores partnere har Solution Architects

som inddrages tidligt i forløbet.

Plan Build Run

CIOGov

EA

Plan Build Run

CIO

EA

OLD NEW

2.2 Tryg IT organisation pr. May 2015

May 1, 202310

BUILD

CORE

RUNPLAN

CIO

SLM & T2PBus. support mgmt. (incl. support)

InitiationPeter Appelros

Development Team 1 DK (incl. ODC)

Global delivery

System Mgmt. NO End User Services

IT OperationsJeroen Bik

Web & Bibeln

Architecture

Test Mgmt. + Method

BFOJens Bjørnebo

Core SystemsAsim Hameed

System Mgmt. DK

Development Management

Project DeliveryNiels Vorum-Petersen

Development Team 2 DK (incl. ODC)

Development Team 1 NO (incl. ODC)

Development Team 2 NO (incl. ODC)

Winsure

Business Development and Projects

Core Systems NOMorten Storetvedt

Core Systems SEEmma Kindblom

IT Vendor relations

Project Mgmt. + Business Analysis

Level 2 director

Level 3 manager Group

11

2.3 Executive Meetings koordinerer retning og compliance

1. maj 202311. december 2012

November 201412

A more agile approach to quickly maximize business opportunities

•Let the business try, let them be the driver (pull)•‘Fail faster’•Beta approach/Quick wins/Agile•Solve problems as they come•Changing plans, no fixed end date

3. Men, vi afviger også fra vores modeller

Some projects require a development ‘modus 2’

Building Foundation (Structure):• License set-up• Network capacity• Infrastructure• Cloud set-up etc

4. EA Check-List for Project Managers and Architects

• Have we evaluated to reuse what we already have; solutions, vendors and platforms (80% is good enough)? One solution per business capability, reducing overlapping solutions

• Have we chosen a market standard solution and will we keep it standard? We want proven solutions, not to be "first mover” in new technologies

• ”One solution in, One or more out” – Will any new solution decommission old ones? We want to continuously reduce complexity to promote IT stability, reduce cost and build a stable architecture

• Do we understand Business & IT impact clearly before we start?

• Does the solution promote STP, Digitalisation and Self-Service etc?

• Have we evaluated architecture guidelines, technical capacity, integration needs etc?

• Will the solution promote customer/user experience, one source for key data

• Have any deviations to the above been correctly approved?

IT Architectural Check-List (high level)

5.1 Utilize partnerships and competition

Projects

AD

AM

Operations

Coreapplications

Sharedapplications

5.2 Sourcing Partnerships - does the happy marriage exist ?

•Monogami or polygami

•Partner or Supplier

•Balancing trust and strict follow up

•Dependencies and committment

•We’re in it together, it’s a win-win or lose-lose game

•Open organisational relationship or exclusive club

•The importance of documenting benefit realisation

•Keep up the internal change management

SPØRGSMÅL ?