estimating the caspian sea level and volga river runoff from
TRANSCRIPT
AndreyAndrey G. G. KostianoyKostianoyP.P. P.P. ShirshovShirshov Institute of Institute of OceanologyOceanology, , Russian Academy of Sciences Russian Academy of Sciences
Sergey A. LebedevSergey A. LebedevGeophysical Center, Russian Academy of SciencesGeophysical Center, Russian Academy of SciencesState Oceanographic InstituteState Oceanographic Institute
JeanJean--FranFranççois Crois Créétaux & Stephane Calmanttaux & Stephane CalmantLegos, Toulouse, FranceLegos, Toulouse, France
Stephano VignudelliStephano VignudelliCNR, Pisa, ItalyCNR, Pisa, Italy
Estimating the Caspian Estimating the Caspian Sea level and Volga river Sea level and Volga river runoff from satellite runoff from satellite altimetryaltimetry
Second Space for Hydrology Workshop, Nov 12-14, 2007, Geneva
The Caspian Sea presents the world’s largest isolated water reservoir, with features including its size, depth, chemical properties, thermohaline structure and water circulation enable to classify it as a deep inland sea. Currently its level is at –27 meters, it occupies an area of 392000 km2, with maximum depth of 1025 m.The isolation of the Caspian Sea from the ocean and its inland position are responsible for a great importance of the outer thermohydrodynamic factors, in particular, the heat and water fluxes through the sea surface, and river runoff for the sea level variability, formation of its 3D thermohaline structure and water circulation.
The CaspianThe Caspian SeaSea
Caspian Sea level variationsand water balance from satellite altimetry
Seasonnal and interannuel dynamic topography of the Caspian Sea from altimetry
and hydrodynamical model
Caspian Sea data base and Cal/Val activities
Over the past half-century, there was a
regression of the Caspian Sea until 1977
when the sea level lowered to −29 m. This
drop is considered to be the deepest for the last 400 years. In 1978 the water level started to
rise rapidly, and now it has stabilized near
the −27 m level. 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000Time (year)
-29
-28
-27
-26
-25
Sea
Leve
l (m
)
The change in the tendancy of the mean sea level variations that occured In the mid 70s, followed by abrupt rise, represents an important indicator of
The changes in the natural regime of the Caspian Sea
The The CaspianCaspian SeaSea LevelLevel VariationVariation
1
2
3
4
56
7 8
209-092
133-092
133-244
057-092
209-016 031-092
031-016 107-092
47 ° 49 ° 51 ° 53 ° 55 °
47 ° 49 ° 51 ° 53 ° 55 °
36 °
38 °
40 °
42 °
44 °
46 °
36 °
38 °
40 °
42 °
44 °
46 °
244
235
209
194
168
133
107
092
066
057
031
016
Southern Part
Middle Part
Northern Part
Temporal Variability of Sea Surface andTemporal Variability of Sea Surface andVolga river water height, from satellite altimetry: Volga river water height, from satellite altimetry:
T/P, Jason, GFO, and T/P, Jason, GFO, and EnvisatEnvisat
235
168
057092
47 ° 49 °
47 ° 49 °
45 °
46 °
47 °
45 °
46 °
47 °
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004Time (year)
-30
-29
-28
-27
-26
Volg
a R
iver
wat
er h
eigh
t (m
)
010
2030
40M
ean
mon
thly
wat
er d
isch
arge
of
Volg
ogra
dska
ya h
ydro
-pow
er s
tatio
n (m
3 ·103 /s
)
123
-27
-26,8
-26,6
-26,4
-26,2
-26
-25,8
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008Date (yr)
Leve
l (m
)
-28-27,8-27,6-27,4-27,2
-27-26,8-26,6-26,4-26,2
-26
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Date (yr)
Leve
l (m
)Caspian Sea level above Baltic Sea
Topex/Poseidon, Jason, GFO, Envisat
+ Hypsometry curve
Water Balance of Caspian SeaTotal Runoff river to Caspian Sea
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
date (year)
Run
off (
km3 )
Runoff to Kara Bogaz Gol
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1870 1890 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990 2010
Date (year)
Run
off (
km3 )
(E-P) deduced from altimetry and in situ data over Caspian Sea (positiv underground water of 4 km3
was taken)
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Date (year)
E-P
(mm
)
Variation of volume of Caspian Sea
73950
74000
74050
74100
74150
74200
74250
74300
74350
74400
74450
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Date (year)
Volu
me
(km
3 )
The Caspian Sea The Caspian Sea Level Rate Level Rate
Mean SSH difference between: 1995 and 1993; 1997 and 1995, revealed from the GCRAS05 MSS Model
The rate of the Caspian Sea SSH change revealed from the T/P and J1 satellite altimetry data
(October 1992 - December 2005
1993 –1995 18.2 ± 3.8 22.8 ± 2.5 20.9 ± 4.9 21.1 ± 4.11995 –1997 -18 ± 1.4 -13.9 ± 1.8 -18 ± 5.6 -24 ± 5.01997 –1999 -3.6 ± 1.5 -6.2 ± 1.7 -5.4 ± 4.3 -5.3 ± 3.21999 –2001 -8.7 ± 2.7 -8.4 ± 1.7 -12 ± 2.4 -9.3 ± 2.92001 –2003 8.9 ± 4.6 7.0 ± 5.3 10.6 ± 6.3 9.1 ± 4.4
Time periodRate of Change, (cm/yr)
Whole Sea
Northern Part
Middle Part
Southern Part
47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
в.д.с.ш. 47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
в.д.с.ш.
1995–19971993–1995
Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Variability Analysis of Spatial and Temporal Variability of Dynamic Topographyof Dynamic Topography
Dynamic topography maps were used to analyze the spatial and temporal variability of the general dynamics in the Caspian Sea. They were constructed on the basis of the superposition of the sea level anomalies distribution over the climatic dynamic topography.The sea level anomalies were calculated from altimetry data.The climatic dynamic topography (or hydrodynamic level) was calculated from three dimensional baroclinic model with free surface. Average monthly fields of temperature and salinity, climatic Volga River run-off and irregular evaporation from sea surface were taken in consideration. Also atmospheric pressure and wind fields from the regional model over the period from 1948 to 2005 were used. This model was developed in Laboratory of Sea Applied Research of Hydrometeorological Research Center of Russian Federation.
47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
Averaged dynamic topography (cm) from numerical
hydrodynamic model (Popov, 2004)
47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
October
47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
July
47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
April
47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
47° 49° 51° 53° 55°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
36°
38°
40°
42°
44°
46°
January
DynamicDynamic TopographyTopography SeasonalSeasonal VariabilityVariability
Average annual variation of CSL
-0.25
-0.15
-0.05
0.05
0.15
0.25
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Date (month)
rela
tive
CSL
/ann
ual
aver
age
(m)
Geographycal distribution of annualCSL variation deduced from 10 years(1993-2002) Of Topex / Poseidon dataand average seasonal variations
Annual Amplitude (m)
Monthly CS volume / annual average (Red) and monthly average Volga river Discharge (Black)
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13Date (month)
Volu
me
(km3 )
CASPIAN SEA DATA BASE
Comparison of Satellite Data Comparison of Satellite Data and Level Gauges Dataand Level Gauges Data
Correlation coefficients and RMS between average monthly data of sea level gauge measurements and SSH derived from satellite altimetry data. Red markers show correlation between data in the Middle Caspian Sea and blue markers – in the Southern Caspian Sea
Correlation coefficients between average monthly data of sea
level gauge measurements and sea level derived from satellite
altimetry data since October 1992 till December 2005
0.18
0.17
0.16
0.15
0.14
RMS (m)
0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1Coefficient of Correlation
057-092 133-244 133-092 209-092 209-016 031-092 031-016
(1) Makhachkala 0,876 0,859 0,923 0,931 0,918 0,931 0,892 0,938(2) Fort Shevchenko 0,899 0,739 0,862 0,853 0,901 0,883 0,874 0,906(3) Zhiloy Island 0,876 0,863 0,948 0,942 0,932 0,931 0,901 0,950(4) Kara-Bogaz-Gol 0,876 0,876 0,943 0,942 0,941 0,948 0,901 0,953(5) Turkmenbashi 0,841 0,889 0,951 0,960 0,913 0,919 0,892 0,941(6) Baku 0,859 0,874 0,952 0,953 0,925 0,954 0,937 0,958(7) Neftyanyye Kamni 0,861 0,850 0,918 0,933 0,914 0,948 0,908 0,940(8) Kuuli Mayak 0,880 0,831 0,925 0,932 0,922 0,942 0,912 0,946
0,909 0,876 0,963 0,964 0,956 0,966 0,936 0,978
Mid
dle
Part
Sout
hern
Pa
rt
Whole Sea (level gauges)
Crossover Points
Level gaugesWhole
Sea(altimetry)
Northern Part Middle Part Southern Part
Makhashkala - Krasnovodsk
-0,1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994
Date (year)
diffe
renc
e (m
)
Makhashkala - Ogurshink
-0,2
-0,1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994
date (year)
Diff
eren
ce (m
)
Makhashkala-Kulaly
-0,2-0,1
00,10,20,30,40,50,60,7
1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994
Date (year)
diffe
renc
e (m
)
Jilov - Baku
-0,6
-0,5
-0,4
-0,3
-0,2
-0,1
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
Day / January 1, 1999
Sea
leve
l diff
eren
ce (m
)
Average: 13 cm
CASPIALT & ALTICORE Project
Installation of few new gauges along the Caspian Sea shorelines
Temporal and permanent GPS levelling
Mean altimetry profile calibratedby GPS campaign
Integrated Caspian Sea database
Sponsored by INTAS, UNESCO, GLOSS,Azerbaidjan and russian Academy of Sciences
Visit of a potential new Bottom Pressure Tide Gauge site
First results of Caspian Sea 2005 GPS Campaign
PerspectivesImprovement and interpretation
of CS water balance
Study impact of:changes in river runoff
global warming Irrigation in the Volga basin
Assimilation of altimetryIn models for study of Dynamic topography of the CS
Geographycall changes in temperature, precipitations and levelIncreasing the spatial distribution (Envisat, Altika)
Creation and maintaince of in situ and remote sensingData base
Caspialt projectCal/val of current and future altimetry
Enhance the international cooperation in the area of CS