fp7 – energy - demonstration work programme 2008
DESCRIPTION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. FP7 – Energy - Demonstration Work programme 2008. Alexandros Kotronaros Unit: Innovation and technological development in energy Athens 4 July 2008. Ενεργειακή πολιτική για την Ευρώπη Στρατηγικοί στόχοι. Ανταγωνιστικότητα. Ασφάλεια Ενεργειακού Εφοδιασμού. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
-
FP7 Energy - DemonstrationWork programme 2008
Alexandros Kotronaros Unit: Innovation and technological development in energyAthens 4 July 2008
| *
| *
2007 2020- 20% (ref = 1990) 20% 10% ( ) 202020% E
1%/: + 13% CO2 2007 2020* * 1% EU 27 Business as Usual Scenario : European Energy Outlook until 2030; European Commission, 2006
| *
? ( , , ) (, 7, )
(CIP, ETS, , )
| *
( )
:
(i) , (ii) ,(iii) , (iv) 7
| *
7 (M)
(Fusion, fission & JRC nuclear activities covered in separate Euratom treaty 2.7bn)(2007 2013)TOTAL 50.5 Billion
Chart1
32413
7510
4750
4097
1751
FP7 budget
YearBudget (M)
20074,857
20085,346
20095,878
20106,683
20117,710
20128,659
20139,637
total48,770
FP7 budget
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Budget (M)
FP7 Annual Budget (Billion )
Specific Programmes
Cooperation32,413
Ideas7,510
People4,750
Capacities4,097
JRC (non-nuclear)1,751
Total50,521
ramping
Specific Programmes
0
0
0
0
0
Cooperation
1. Health6,100
2. Food, Agriculture, Fisheries, Biotechnology1,935
3. Information & Communication Technologies9,050
4. Nano-sciences, Nano-technologies, Materials & New Production Technologies3,475
5. Energy2,350
6. Environment1,890
7. Transport4,160
8. Socio-economic Sciences & Humanities623
9. Space1,430
10. Security1,400
Total32,413
Cooperation
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
| *
COOPERATION (32,4 Billion)
Chart3
6100
1935
9050
3475
2350
1890
4160
623
1430
1400
2.350
6.100
1.935
9.050
3.475
1.890
4.160
0.623
1.430
1.400
FP7 budget
YearBudget (M)
20074,857
20085,346
20095,878
20106,683
20117,710
20128,659
20139,637
total48,770
FP7 budget
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Budget (M)
FP7 Annual Budget (Billion )
Specific Programmes
Cooperation32,413
Ideas7,510
People4,750
Capacities4,097
JRC1,751
Total50,521
ramping
Specific Programmes
0
0
0
0
0
Cooperation
1. Health6,100
2. Food, Agriculture, Fisheries, Biotechnology1,935
3. Information & Communication Technologies9,050
4. Nano-sciences, Nano-technologies, Materials & New Production Technologies3,475
5. Energy2,350
6. Environment1,890
7. Transport4,160
8. Socio-economic Sciences & Humanities623
9. Space1,430
10. Security1,400
Total32,413
Cooperation
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
| *
topics topics 2 3 RTD (predominant research) and TREN (predominant demonstration)
| *
RTD TREN ?Open in call : FP7-ENERGY-2008-TREN-1
Open in call: FP7-ENERGY-2008-1DG TREN ( )DG RTD ( ) 2008
| *
?
2020
( 20%)
| *
Predominant demonstration:
70% / / 25% 7%
| *
2 DG TREN - 8 2008, 17:00
10 28 2008 2008 2009 2009 / 2009 2009 2008
| *
2008 (DG TREN)
42 M* 35 M* 20 M* 5 M 5 M*CONCERTO40 M* 20-30 147 M
* ;
| *
- (42 M*)PV multiple benefitsBiomass medium-large power plantsWaste-to-electricity installationsWind: large on-shore and off-shore: cost reductionGeothermal for low/medium temperature sitesConcentrated solar power: cost reductionOcean: from prototype to grid connectionStorage of electricity
* ;
| *
CONCERTO 2008
| *
(35 M*)
( ) lignocellulosics ( )
* ;
| *
CCS / (20 M*)Fluidized bed combustion (with a view to CCS)Oxygen based combustion (with a view to CCS)Advanced gas turbines for IGCC (with a view to CCS)Study for a large scale zero emission power plant using fossil fuels CCS: only research (DG RTD)
* ;
| *
(5 M*),
.* ;
| *
(5 M*) * ;
| *
SolarWave/Tidal PV
| *
,
| *
Ecobuildings Wave/Tidal
| *
Tool: Collaborative projectsDemonstration 70%Research + Monitoring + Dissemination 21%Training 2%Management 7%Specific Programme COOPERATIONCONCERTO activity Energy 2.8, 4.4, 8.4Indicative %INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIONIs compulsory
| *
CONCERTO
| *
| *
3
| *
| *
2 CONCERTO 1. 2.
:
| *
/
/
, .Focus on Research Excellence and Innovation
| *
5 (max)10
| *
(BEST and CDS)
| *
/
normal homework (.. ) :
| *
[EUR/m built or refurbished]100 systems ( ) [EUR/kW ] 1200 [EUR/kW ]5500 [EUR/m ]500
| *
/ 3-4 M
: 10
| *
Today, 46 CONCERTO communities in 18 projects
| *
CONCERTO Plus adds value to the CONCERTO projects
-
Those who are familiar with the proposal and negotiation submission forms know that in the past, participants had to provide to the Commission their legal and financial information every time they submit a proposal or negotiate a contract. To eliminate these redundant requests for information, we invite you to register your organisations data only once in the Unique Registration Facility or URF. You will receive after registration a Participant Identification Code (or PIC) which you will be able to use in all proposals submissions and negotiations.New
| *
( Parts A & B )
In/Out of scope of Topic & Funding Scheme
( DG RTD )e.g.. Funding threshold of 4 M between small-med & large Collaborative Projects in DG RTD Energy CallNew for FP7
| *
DG TREN DG TREN 4 ( )DG TREN - DG TREN
| *
S&T Quality (in relation to the call topic)Concept, objectives, work-planImplementationIndividual participants and consortium as a wholeAllocation of resourcesImpactContribution to expected impact as given in work programmePlans for dissemination/exploitation Criteria adapted to each funding scheme
Three evaluation criteriaNew for FP7New for FP7
| *
Evaluation Criteria for ALL proposals3/53/53/510/15Scoring:Each criterion marked out of 5Threshold for each criterion = 3 Overall threshold for three criteria = 10 out of 15New for FP7
| *
FP7 Statistics of 1st call evaluationNumber of proposals
| *
Frequent weaknesses of proposals
S/T qualityLimited innovation / Not beyond commercial practices Not entirely addressing the topic priorities Insufficient demonstration part Insufficient quality of the concept and work plan
ImplementationUnclear complementarity/ experience of consortium partnersInappropriate management structureInappropriate resources allocation /justificationImpactLimited monitoring and dissemination foreseenNo significant impact / replication potential /European added valueLack of involvement of industrial partners
Unstructured text, difficult to readUnclear /incomplet information
| *
7 Read Guidance note for CONCERTO proposersFind partners Complete draft CDS and BEST tablesDiscuss principle with NCPs or EC officers
?
| *
Officers responsible for the different topics
| *
Contacts of technical officers
| *
More information
Homepage DG Energy and Transporthttp://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy_transport/index_en.html
FP7 Cordis homepage: www.cordis.europa.eu
Guidance note for CONCERTO proposers The CONCERTO guidelines are located on CORDIS: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/dc/index.cfm?fuseaction=usersite.FP7DetailsCallPage&CALL_ID=127
Concerto Plus : http://concertoplus.eu
The energy policy for Europe is based on three pillars:The need to enhance the business competitivenessThe need to improve the security of energy supplyThe need to improve sustainable development