(ground-based) gravitational wave astronomy · ott dec 2010. title:...
TRANSCRIPT
(Ground-based) Gravitational wave astronomy
2
Gravitational waves exist!
• Binary pulsars:
PSR B1913+16
Weisberg &!Taylor 03!
What are GW? Really: • Required by Einstein’s gravity • “Ripples” on spacetime • Often highly nonlinear
This talk: • Linear, spin-2 transverse wave • Cause “length changes”: • Like EM:
L
LLh Δ~
Example: Two black holes (no spin) Amplitude:
Two black holes Newtonian circular orbit
• Characteristic relative length changes ~ (kinetic energy)/(distance)
€
h ~ 10−21 M /8M0( )5 / 3 d /30Mpc( )−1 f /100Hz( )2 / 3
r
d
3/~ rMΩ
( )π/22 Ω== orbff
( ) 3/22
2
2
~~1~ ΩMdM
dMv
dtId
dh
( ) ( ) 2/313 6/8/10 −−= MrMMHzf o
Sensitivity needed? (LIGO) ΔL ~ h L ~ 10-21 4km ~ 4 x 10-16 cm laser light ~ 10-4cm atom ~ 10-8cm
What makes GW?
Source: ~ any accelerating matter no screening Weak coupling: Imaging impractical:
(strong sources) <~ wavelength
• Hard to make & detect • Hard to obscure
Source: ~any accelerating charge screening limits size… s Strong coupling: Imaging often practical:
(common sources) >> wavelength
• Easy to make & detect • Easy to obscure
Gravitational Waves EM Waves
What makes GW?
Sources
f(Hz) λ(m)
10-8 1016
10-4 1012
10-2 1010
108
106
104
1
102
Detectors
Ground-based interferometers (LIGO/VIRGO/GEO/TAMA)
Big bang 10-6
Merging Black Holes: Big (center of galaxy) Small (post-supernova)
104
…and more!
Spinning neutron stars
Space-based interferometers (LISA)
Pulsar timing CMB fluctuations
LISA (planned) Detection I: Scale important
Detection II: How sensitive? Range: Depends (a) source (how much energy vs frequency) : dE/df (b) detector (preferred frequencies): Sh(f)
�4 �2 0 2
�22
�20
�18
�16
log f�Hz�
0.5logSh�1�Hz
�
100 200 300 400 500 600
1.0
10.0
5.0
2.0
20.0
3.0
30.0
1.5
15.0
7.0
f
d�Mpc
�
Dburst � c−1 1ρ
�2
5π2
∆Egw(G/c5)(f2Sh(f))
LISA (space) LIGO
(ground)
compare to flux threshold
D ��
L/4πFcrit
1052erg (=SN, all in GW)
What makes GW? Example: Two black holes (no spin) Waveform: 3 epochs
Inspiral: • ~ Quasicircular orbits in potential V(r | L(t)) • Amplitude by changing binding energy
Merger - Hard
Ringdown: - One perturbed hole “ringing”
Movie: black-holes.org
Binaries: Chirp • Frequecy = 2*orbit…
• Chirp: Frequency, amplitude increase – Set by energy, energy loss rate
• Identifying source: Where on the track are we? Chirp rate, not frequency at any time
Out[135]=
0 2 4 6 8 10
�3.�10�20
�2.�10�20
�1.�10�20
0
1.�10�20
2.�10�20
3.�10�20
Out[133]=
0 2 4 6 8 100
50
100
150
200
250
300
t
f�gw�
• Sky location:
Wavelength set by detector: 100 Hz Detector d : 10 ms apart
Easier for bright sources (as 1/amplitude) Easier with complex sources (spin & polarization):
degeneracies
• Mass Via chirp rate
df/dt -> mass [mass ratio : fine structure]
• Distance
Absolute distance scale
€
SNR∝ M 5 / 6
d
Measurables: Inspiral
δθ � λ/d
Bonus material: Binary “track” h(f) “Amplitude” vs f: h(f): • Key concept: “Track” h(f (t) ) for binaries • Compare to detector sensitivities
D. Shoemaker, NSF review 2004
h(f)“ ∝ ”�
dE/df/f2
Bonus material: Supernova to BH Complex signal, several epochs [bounce; unstable NS; collapse; ringdown] Mostly high frequency (collapse time ~ R/c~ms), messy
Ott Dec 2010