hawaiian holdings, inc. (ha) - amazon web...

SEPTEMBER 2016

HAWAIIAN HOLDINGS, INC. (HA)

1

This presentation contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

of 1995 that reflect the Company’s current views with respect to certain current and future events and financial

performance. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” variations of

such words, and similar expressions are also intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking

statements are and will be, as the case may be, subject to many risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to the

Company’s operations and business environment, all of which may cause the Company’s actual results to be materially

different from any future results, expressed or implied, in these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties

include, without limitation, the Company’s ability to accurately forecast quarter and year-end results; economic volatility;

the price and availability of aircraft fuel; fluctuations in demand for transportation in the markets in which the Company

operates; the Company’s dependence on tourist travel; foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; and the Company’s

ability to implement its growth strategy.

The risks, uncertainties and assumptions referred to above that could cause the Company’s results to differ materially from

the results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements also include the risks, uncertainties and assumptions

discussed from time to time in the Company’s public filings and public announcements, including the Company’s Annual

Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as well

as other documents that may be filed by the Company from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All

forward-looking statements included in this presentation are based on information available to the Company on the date

hereof. The Company does not undertake to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or

circumstances that may arise after the date hereof even if experience or future changes make it clear that any projected

results expressed or implied herein will not be realized.

Forward-looking statements

2

Where we fly – Hawai‘i’s destination carrier

3

Strong domestic year-over-year unit revenue trend

Note 1: Domestic PRASM includes North America and Neighbor Islands routes.Note 2: Capacity is based on data from Diio Mi as of 7/28/2016 and defined as the industry seats from North America to Hawai‘i in HA’s markets.

9.6% 4.0%

-4.7%

-2.9%

-8.6% -8.1%

-1.5%2.0%

1.3% 2.6%

0%

4%

9%10% 10%

13%

6%5% 4%

0%2%

0%

1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16E 4Q16E

Domestic PRASM YoY Industry Seat Growth YoY

4

Outperforming competitors on the West Coast

Growing Hawaiian Airlines West Coast PRASM Premium

HNL OGGLAX l l

SFO l l

OAK l l

SJC l l

SEA l l

LAS l Key

PDX l l Over 5%

SAN l l 2% to 5%

PHX l l -2% to 2%

Note: Estimates based on USDOT DB1B and T100 for trailing twelve month ending March 31, 2016.

5

International – improvements in underlying market performance and the lapping of FX headwinds

JPY / USD

2015

AUD / USD

¥100

¥105

¥110

¥115

¥120

¥125

Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov

JPY / USD

2016

AUD / USD

1.00

1.10

1.20

1.30

1.40

1.50

Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov

6

TTM 2Q15 MarketPerformanceand Network

Changes

FX FuelSurcharge

TTM 2Q16

International PRASM

Growing our presence in Japan

Japan is the largest source of

international visitors to Hawai‘i

40% of outbound U.S. traffic

from Japan is to Hawai‘i

Increasing flights to Tokyo

Launched daily Narita-Honolulu

service in July 2016

Launching a second daily Haneda

service in December split between

Honolulu and Kona

2nd largest seat share (24%) of

flights from Japan to Hawai‘i1

Note : Based on data available through January 1, 2017 on Diio Mi as of 7/28/2016.

7

Growing sales of value-added products

• Averaging over $4M/month2

• Growth will come from additional inventory, pricing optimization, and new distribution channels

• >10% credit card portfolio growth

• >20% growth in credit card spend

$14.69

$19.72

$22.01 $23.25

2013 2014 2015 2Q2016Other

Baggage

Sales of HawaiianMiles

Extra Comfort / Preferred Seat Sales

Value-added revenue per passenger

Note 1: “Other” includes ticket fees, first class upgrades, vacation commissions and on-board sales.Note 2: Includes Extra Comfort and Preferred Seat revenue.

8

1

1.5%

0.5%

0.5%

0.5%

Targeting low single digit CASM ex-Fuel growth

Note 1: 2011 CASM ex-fuel excludes lease termination expense of $70.0M.

Note 2: 2016 CASM ex-fuel guidance excludes any assumptions for the amendable contract with our

pilots’ union.

Wages, Benefits, & Profit Sharing

Aircraft Rent8.70

8.18 7.88 8.15 8.31

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016E

CASM ex-Fuel (in cents)2016 CASM ex-Fuel Y/Y

Headwinds

Up 2.5% to up 4.5%

Maintenance

Purchased Services

9

1

2

2

Record financial performance in 2015 with further improvements in 2016

$0.85 $1.06

$0.88

$1.55

$3.09

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Adjusted Earnings Per Share Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin

4.6% 4.6%3.6%

6.9%

13.2%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

10

Free cash flow strengthens our balance sheet

Note: 18-mo FCF consists of periods FY2015 and 1H2016.

Uses of 18-mo FCF = $645M

$(118)M$761M

$133M $159M

$735M

Cash fromOperations

Aircraft SLB Property,Equipment, &

PDP

Free Cash Flow

Sources of 18-mo FCF

$266M

$131M

$50M

$186M

$11M

Prepay Aircraft DebtScheduled Principal Debt RepaymentShare Buy BackConvertible Notes Buy BackPension Contribution

11

Lowering our leverage and interest expense

Note 1: Leverage is defined as adjusted debt to EBITDAR.Note 2: Aircraft Rent is capitalized at 7x.

$1,050M

$772M

$586M

2014 2015 2Q2016

4.2x

2.7x2.2x

2014 2015 2Q2016

Decreasing Debt Obligation Decreasing Leverage

Expected interest expense savings of ~$19M in 2016

12

Pilots IAM/Salaried

Funding our pension plans in excess of minimum requirements

Reducing our pension liability leads to:

- Decreases in future contributions

- Decreases in future pension expense

- Decreases in PBGC premiums

- Tax savings 2Q2016

Pension liability OPEB

Detail of pension liability

$197M

$177M

Pension and other postretirement liability Benefits

$148M

$29M

$11M of pension contributions through 2Q16 doubling minimum requirements

13

30%32%

34%

2014 2015 2Q2016

Maintaining a strong liquidity ratio

• Strong cash position with

the current favorable

operating environment

• Strong liquidity while

investing in our business

Note 1: Cash = cash, cash equivalents, short term investments and $175M availability under the

revolving credit facility.

Cash1 / TTM revenue

14

• Hawai‘i’s leading airline

• Profitable with strong financial metrics

• Generating free cash flow and strengthening our

balance sheet

• Creating long-term value for our shareholders

Conclusion

15

Mahalo.16

Third Quarter and Full Year 2016 Outlook

Note: CASM ex-fuel guidance excludes any assumptions for the amendable contract with our pilots’

union.

FY16 Guidance

Item Full Year 2015 Full Year 2016 Guidance

Cost per ASM Excluding Fuel (cents)....... 8.31 Up 2.5% to up 4.5%

ASMs (millions)........................................ 17,726.3 Up 3% to up 5%

Gallons of jet fuel consumed (millions)... 234.2 Up 2.5% to up 4.5%

Economic fuel price per gallon................ $2.04 $1.50 to $1.60

The table below summarizes the Company’s expectations for the third quarter ending September 30, 2016 and full year ending December 31, 2016, expressed as an expected percentage change compared to the results for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 and year ended December 31, 2015 (the historical results for which are presented for reference).

3Q16 Guidance

ItemThird Quarter 2015

Third Quarter 2016 Guidance

Cost per ASM Excluding Fuel (cents)......... 7.97 Up 2% to up 5%

Operating Revenue Per ASM (cents)......... 13.55 Down 1% to up 2%

ASMs (millions)......................................... 4,663.2 Up 4.5% to up 6.5%

Gallons of jet fuel consumed (millions).... 61.2 Up 4% to 6%

Economic fuel price per gallon.................. $1.95 $1.50 to $1.60

17

Non-GAAP Reconciliations: Adjusted Net Income and CASM ex-Fuel

NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS

($ in thousands, except CASM data) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 2Q2016

GAAP Operating Expenses $1,630,176 $1,832,955 $2,022,118 $2,069,747 $1,891,364 $475,720

Less: aircraft fuel, including taxes and delivery (513,284) (631,741) (698,802) (678,253) (417,728) (83,798)

Less: lease termination expense (70,014) - - - - -

Adjusted operating expenses - excluding aircraft fuel and lease termination

$1,046,878 $1,201,214 $1,323,316 $1,391,494 $1,473,636 $391,922

Available Seat Miles 12,039,933 14,687,472 16,785,827 17,073,630 17,726,322 4,551,094

CASM - GAAP (in cents) 13.54 12.48 12.05 12.12 10.67 10.45

Less: aircraft fuel and lease termination expense (in cents) (4.84) (4.30) (4.16) (3.97) (2.36) (1.84)

CASM Excluding Fuel and lease termination expense (in cents) 8.70 8.18 7.88 8.15 8.31 8.61


($ in thousands) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 2Q2016

Net Income (Loss), GAAP $(2,649) $53,237 $51,854 $68,926 $182,646 $79,570

Lease termination expense 70,014 - - - - -

Loss on extinguishment of debt - - - (3,885) 12,058 6,643

Changes in fair value of fuel derivatives 6,432 3,958 (8,684) 43,106 (1,015) (29,886)

Tax effect of adjustments (25,432) (1,583) 3,474 (18,796) (4,417) 8,832

Adjusted Net Income, Non-GAAP $43,218 $55,612 $46,644 $97,121 $189,272 $65,159

The Company evaluates its financial performance utilizing various GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures, including operating income and CASM. Pursuant to Regulation G, the Company has included the following reconciliation of reported non-GAAP financial measures to comparable financial measures reported on a GAAP basis. The Company believes that excluding fuel costs from certain measures is useful to investors because it provides an additional measure of management’s performance excluding the effects of a significant cost item over which management has limited influence.

18

Non-GAAP Reconciliations: Adjusted Pre-tax Income and Pre-Tax Margin



Income Before Income Taxes, as reported $(1,082) $85,786 $86,410 $113,447 $295,688 $128,640

Add back:

Changes in fair value of fuel derivatives 6,432 3,958 (8,684) 43,107 (1,015) (29,866)

Loss on extinguishment of debt - - - 3,885 12,058 6,643

Lease termination expense 70,014 - - - - -

Adjusted Income Before Income Taxes, Non-GAAP $75,364 $89,744 $77,726 $160,438 $306,731 $105,417

Revenue $1,650,459 $1,962,353 $2,155,865 $2,314,879 $2,317,467 $594,590



Pre-Tax Margin, as reported (0.1)% 4.4% 4.0% 4.9% 12.7% 21.6%

Add back:

Changes in fair value of fuel derivatives, net of tax 0.4% 0.2% (0.4)% 1.8% - (5.0%)

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net of tax - - - 0.1% 0.5% 1.1%

Lease termination expense, net of tax 4.3% - - - - -

Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin 4.6% 4.6% 3.6% 6.9% 13.2% 17.7%

19

LeverageNON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS

($ in thousands) FY 2014 FY 2015 2Q2016 TTM

Debt and capital lease obligations $1,049,637 $772,144 585,977

Add back:

Aircraft leases capitalized at 7x last 12 months’ aircraft rent

744,954 809,571 825,433

Adjusted debt and capital lease obligations $1,794,691 $1,581,715 $1,411,410

Income Before Income Taxes $112,634 $295,688 $386,172

Add back:

Interest and amortization of debt expense 64,420 55,678 46,245

Depreciation and amortization 96,374 105,581 106,999

Aircraft Rent 106,422 115,653 117,918

EBITDAR $379,850 $572,600 $657,334

Adjustments

Add back: 43,108 (1,015) (20,378)

Changes in fair value of derivative contracts

Loss on extinguishment of debt 3,885 12,058 14,809

Adjusted EBITDAR $426,843 $583,643 $651,765

Leverage Ratio 4.2x 2.7x 2.2x

The Company evaluates its financial performance utilizing various GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures, including operating income and CASM. Pursuant to Regulation G, the Company has included the following reconciliation of reported non-GAAP financial measures to comparable financial measures reported on a GAAP basis. The Company believes that excluding fuel costs from certain measures is useful to investors because it provides an additional measure of management’s performance excluding the effects of a significant cost item over which management has limited influence.

20

hawaiian holdings, inc. (ha) - amazon web...

Documents