high-temperature optical constants, band-gap energies and
TRANSCRIPT
HighHigh--temperature optical constants, bandtemperature optical constants, band--gap gap energies and inenergies and in--situ growth monitoring of ZnOsitu growth monitoring of ZnOthin filmsthin films
N. AshkenovN. Ashkenov##,, M. SchubertM. Schubert, M. Lorenz, H. , M. Lorenz, H. HochmuthHochmuth,,M. M. GrundmannGrundmannInstitute for Experimental Physics II, Faculty of Physics and Geosciences, University of Leipzig, Germany
#E-mail: [email protected] D01
Printed by Universitätsrechenzentrum Leipzig
Our messages
InputUnit
OutputUnit
PLD chamber setup
Pulsed-Laser-Deposition
� Growth of wurtzite-type ZnO and Zn1-x(Cd,Mg)xO compound films on a-, c-, and r- plane Al2O3 � KrF excimer laser ablation� Optical ports at AOI of 70°
� polarizer-sample-rotating-compensator-analyzer� spectral range: 0.75-3.345 eV� diode-array detector� ex-situ mode possible� typical measurement time: 0.5 … 2s
In-situ Ellipsometer setups
PLD: temperature calibration
PLD growth of (0001) ZnO thin film on (0001) Al2O3
High-temperature ZnO band gap
Roll-coater setup, Solarion GmbH, Leipzig
InputUnit
OutputUnit
Ion-Beam-Deposition
� Growth of Cu1-x(In,Ga)xSe2-based solar-cells on flexible polymer sheets� Optical access ports at AOI of 43° and 67°
3rd International Conference on Spectroscopic Ellipsometry, July 7-11, Vienna, Austria
Goals: in-situ Ellipsometry control of novel flexible solar cells
2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.3
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1123 K
973 K
773 K
523 K
300 K
Photon Energy [eV]
ε 1
Sik et al.1
present work
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.03
4
5
6
7
300 K
1154 K
962 K
681 K
<e1>
Photon Energy [eV]
Experiment Model Fit
� SE-spectra of Si-wafer at different sample-heater power values � Use of known temperature-dependent
Si-optical constants1
� Calibration of the heater power to adjust the actual sample temperature
1 J. Šik et al., J. Appl. Phys.84, 6291 (1998).
� Temperature-dependent ex-situ SE spectra of a bulk (0001) ZnO from 300 K to 1154 K
� Strong red-shift and splitting of the E0
A,B,C band-gap energies with temperature:dE0
A/dT= – (7±1)×10-4 eV/K dE0
B/dT = – (6±1)×10-4 eV/KdE0
C/dT = – (5±1)×10-4 eV/K � Linear increase of the optical constants
In-situ monitoring and feed-back control of CuInSe2 (Cu(In,Ga)Se2) and ZnO (Zn(Cd,Mg)O ) thin film growth
Funded by the BMBF within the Wachstumskern INNOCIS
In Summary
In-situ: Virtual-Interface-ApproachStep 1. Nucleation-zone thickness: 15 nm
Growth-rate increases Step 2. Growth-rate decreases
Optical constants changeTotal film thickness: 630 nm
Linear-growth-rate analysis fails because the growth rates changes with time
Ex-situ-analysisNucleation zone is not detectableTotal film thickness: 634 nmSurface roughness: 4.7 nmFilm-thickness-non-uniformity: 7.3%
ConclusionsEx-situ effective thickness in good agreement with actual thickness, but gradient due to growth-rate-change and nucleation zone cannot be resolved
In-situ ellipsometry is a versatile technique for optical monitoring of PLD-grown ZnO thin films.
Sample temperature calibration versus heater power can be easily done.
We report the high-temperature band-gap energies and optical constants of ZnO.
The ZnO growth rate depends on deposition time, causing vertical gradients of optical constants and likely changes in the thin film microstructure. This gradient cannot be resolved anymore from a post-growth ex-situ ellipsometry experiment.
Here: ZnO thin films� Attractive for developing short-wavelength optical devices:
wide band gap (~3.37 eV) and high exciton binding energiesband gap engineering: Zn1-x(Cd,Mg)xO compound thin films
� Applications as transparent conducting oxide:front contacts for flexible solar cells
(0001) Sapphire
(0001) ZnO
M-2000VI in-situ Ellipsometer (J.A.Woollam Co.)
Si ε1 at elevated temperatures
Sample temperature vs. heater power ZnO band-gap energies
ZnO <ε1> at elevated temperatures
0 10 20 30 40
-20
-10
0
10
20
30 EndStart Step 2Step1
Del
ta [d
eg.]
Time [min.]
2.355 eV
Two-step-growth-process2
In-situ data analysis: Virtual-Interface-Approach3
In-situ data analysis results
8 10 120.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4 Step 1
Rat
e [a
ngst
./sec
.]
Time [min.]20 30 40
3.0
3.3
3.6
3.9
4.2 Step 2
Step 1 Step 2
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.01.9
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
n
Photon Energy [eV]
16 min. 29 min. 39 min.
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Step 2
k
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.01.9
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
Step 1
13 min.
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Step 1
Step 2
6 8 10 12 14-15
-12
-9
-6
-3
0
Del
ta [d
eg.]
Time [min.]
Model Fit 3.317 eV 2.355 eV 1.817 eV 1.252 eV
Step 1
15 20 25 30 35 40
-15
0
15
30
45
60
75
Del
ta [d
eg.]
Time [min.]
Model Fit 3.317 eV 2.355 eV 1.817 eV 1.252 eV
Step 2
Ex-situ data analysis
Growth Conditions
2 E. M. Kaidashev et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 3901 (2003).
O2-Pressure = 3*10-4 mbar400 Laser pulses /1 Hz/600 mJ
Step 1
O2- Pressure = 1*10-2 mbar16000 Laser pulses /10 Hz/600 mJ
Step 2
3 D. E. Aspnes et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 2707 (1990).
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
<ε1>
Photon Energy [eV]
Experiment Model Fit
0 150 300 450 600 750300
450
600
750
900
1050
1200
T = A*Pn/(kn+Pn)+B
T - Temperature [K]P - Heater-Power [W]A-,B-,n - Calibration Coefficients
Tem
pera
ture
[K]
Power [W]
Si Wafer Model Fit
400 600 800 1000 1200
2.8
3.0
3.2
3.4 Eg
BE(T)=Eg(0)-β*θ/[exp(θ/T)-1]
Ene
rgy
[eV
]
T [K]
E0
A
E0
B
E0
C
Bose-Einstein Model Fit
T=1053 K
www.solarion.de
Future task: CuInSe2/ZnO heterostructures � CIGS absorber layers for high-efficient solar cells:
New generation of thin film solar cell structureson flexible polymer sheetsBand gap engineering: Cu1-x(In,Ga)xSe2 compound thin films