intensive thermal upwelling at a seamount in the …...mariana trough is a good example of spreading...
TRANSCRIPT
IAMSTEC掫尚研寛 第1(盻
「し ん か い6500 」 と海底 地 震計 に よる
南 部 マ リ アナ トラ フ 海 山 に お け る
強 い熱 的 湧昇 流 の 証 拠
笠原 順三*l 佐藤 利典*l 藤岡換太郎12
北枇18 度に位 置する爾 留マリフ ナトラフ軸東齠 の海山 の頂上に 光磁気 デスク型 海底地 震叶
(MooBs)を 設置 し た。 海暖地 震ltは207℃ の灌ぽを示す 熱水 ベンドの 1m脇に落 下した。海
山 直下 の鰉露 活助は 大変低 かうたが。 多数 の圧力・りレスが海底地 露itの/ヽイドロフ ォyに よ9
て 観測さ れた。 圧力 パル スは圧 力の急 激な低下を示 し,ま たその圃有周期 は3a秒 から 1分 で
あ りた。観測の途中 で「しんかい6500 」によ ってベン ドの南 部30m に海 底 地震叶を移動 した。
移 ●售 兩カパ ル スの 数と振 帽は急 激な減少を示 した。 この観 測陪果 ぽ圧力 パルスが為 的ぺy F
からの爨昇洫 によ うてできたことを示 している のだろ う。熱 的ベンドには フルピニ コンカ の群
落が見つか・ク た。精 宙海廖洫形には 2本の リ5 アメ ントが認められる。1本は南郎 マリアナト
ラ フの軸上に ,他は トラフ岫の東側にあ る。後 者はヱシ・ 口y状配列を示 し,熟的 ベンド群が
見 つかっ だりs アj ントのある海山を 縦断しを いる。 熱的活 動の存 在は過 去のト ラフ軸と考え
ら れる地形上 の海嶺 の18km 東 に, リ フティ ング過程 かあ る同席 進行して いることを意味 する
の だろう。
キ ーワー ド: 熟水べ y卜,圧カ パ4,ス.海底地震叶, マ9 アナトラ フ, 推水躙
Intensive Thermal Upwelling at a Seamount
in the South Mariana Trough Observed by
Ocean Bottom Seismic Instruments Using
"Shink&i 6500" Submersible
Junzo KASAHARA*3 Toshinori SATO*3 Kanttro FUJIOKA'4
An MOOBS (Magneto Optical Ocean Bottom Seismometer) wag deployed at just 1 m
beside of * hoc thermal vent whose temperature was 207*0 on the summit region of the
seamount located in 18km east ol the south Marians Trough axis. Although ihe seismi
city just eatfc the sesmcunt wg$ very w≫sk. oumcrous pressure events were observed
by hydrophone channel showing sudden pressure decrease. The characteristic period of
the pressure pulses is from 30 seconds to Imin. Submersible "Sinhai
6500* relocated
MOOBS at 30m south of the vent and the sei&mie records show a
drastic change of
j醇
* 1 東 京 大 学地 震 研究 所
* 2 海 路 科 学技 術 セ ン タ ー深 海 研 究 部
* S Elrthquake R恚SSarch lnstitu14 University 01Toky o
* 4 Deep Sajl Re se●rCh Departxnとnt.Japan Mlrine Science aod Tech' てKgOgy Cenlar
JA MSTEC J.D●●p S●I R軸。10 (1994)
number and amplitude of pressure events. This suggests that pressure events might be
generated by the hot water up writing from the thermal vent, where an almiccncha
colony was found. Tftere are two set of topographic lineaments, the one for axis region
of the south Mariana Trough, arid the other located eastward of the axis. The eastward
lineament, which forms echelon arrangements, cuts the summit of seaxnouni where
thermal vent chain were found along the Hnesmept The existence of thermal activity
implies some extent of rifting process occurring in the 18km east of the topographic ridge
which Is supposed to be the previous Trough axis.
Hey words: Hot thermal vent. Pressure pulse, Ocean bottom seismometer, the Mariana
Trough, Submersible
1, Introduction
Oceanic spreading and rifting are thought to be
major sources of global climate changes because heat
flux generated by submarine volcanic activities
seems one hundred times of land volcanoes. Ocean*
ic ridges and troughs are major constituents for such
submarine volcanoes. Although there are extensive
researches on volcanic activity of oceanic ridges and
troughs done by portable instruments, none of
surveys have been done continuously and in real
time,
Mariana Trough is a good example of spreading
center or rifting center of backarc regions (Pig, 1),
In the north of Mariana Trough, several researches
were made using deep-tow camera and rock dregs
(Hawkins, et al, 1990), submersible dives (Craig
et aL 1987) and multi-narrow-beam teg , Kasahara
etal, 1993). Thermal vents were found on the
summit of ridge located at axis region of the Mariana
Trough at 18"N by submersible Alvin dive (Craig
et al, 1987). Temperature was measured as 28?*C at
one of these vents. Similar hydrothertnal chimneys
and biological colonies were confirmed by submersi*
ble "Shinkai 6500" dives at the same location, where
the temperature was 2801D (Gamo et al, 1993). The
topographic survey of Mariana Trough shows close
resemblance to the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, which is a
typical slow spreading center (Hawkins et aL, 1990;
Kong etaU 1993), Magnetic survey also supports
that the Mariana Trough is a type of very slow
spreading (Seama and Fujiwara, 1993). Intense
seismicity was found at the Mariana Trough around
164
18* N (Hussong and Sinton, 1982; Kasahara et aJ,
199$). Crustal structure near the Pagan fracture
sone at the 1763<W shows a typical oceanic crust,
suggesting young oceanic crust formation at this
location (Blbee et si., 1980)- Although there are ex*
tensive researches on volcanic activity of oceanic
ridges and troughs done by portable instruments,
none of surveys have been done continuously and in
real-tine. To monitor submarine volcanic activity
in the Marina Trough region, the authors are propos-
ing to install an integrated geophysical station at one
of the most active thermal vent as a part of G≪0-TOC
(Geophysical and Oceanographical Trans Ocean
Cable) project (Kasahara etaL, 1994).
In the southern part of the Mariana Trough, active
thermal-vents, active chimneys and vent biological
colonies were also found on a summit of seamount
Cl43°65' E. 18*24' N, 1.470m) located at the eastern
side of the trough axis by a "Shinkai 6500" #161 dive
(Garro et al, 1993). The temper was tou:vi as
202 °C at one of the most active thermal vent Al-
though a number of researches revealed strong evi-
dences of backarc spreading or rifting in the north-
ern part of Mariana Trough, southern half of the
trough remains as unsolved problem in stage of
backarc tectonics. Finding of hydrothermal vents
in the 18km east of the southern Mariana Trough
axis might be an evidence of active spreading and
detailed survey of these thermal vents will give solu-
tion for this question. It has been proposed that
spreading of Mariana Trough occurred at the south
and has migrated toward north (Karig, 1971). Ac-
JAMSTEC J Deec SeaRes , 10 {1994)
Fig. 1 (a) Mariana backarc region and hydrothecmal vent area. Number* show previous "Shinkai 6500" dives at
Mariana Trough (after Game et al, 1993). (b) Detail map of south Mariana Trough and location ol dive (9S.
Dive 185 ia almost the same location as this scale. Dotted line shows Mariana Trough axis.
cording Co this hypothesis, the southern part of Mari-
ana Trough already stopped the spreading. It is
interesting to examine whether this is correct or not
In August 8, 1993, a large earthquake, whose mag-
nitude is reported as M 8.2, occurred at forearc side of
Mariana Islands and made some damages on build*
ings, During aftershocks sequence, some events
occurred in the south Mariana Trough area (Fig. 2),
Focal plane solutions of main shock and two large
aftershocks were estimated as thrust having vertical
and horizontal fault plane (PDE) aJthough princi*
pal axes show different directions in the horizontal
plane among them. Sugi (1993) concluded that the
horizontal plane was rupture plane because after*
shocks formed nearly horizontal distribution.
Ad this experiment was carried out in two months
after the main shock (October 17 and 2$), it was
expected to detect some aftershock activities of the
M 8.2 main shock occurring in the south Mariana
Trough ares. In this experiment, one digital OBS
with a hydrophone was deployed on the summit of
seamount, where active thermal vents were previ*
JAM ST EC J. Deep Sea Res.. 10 (1994)
ously found by "Shinkai" dive, located eastern side of
Che southern Mariana Trough (Photo 1). It was
planned to observe OBS and to replace it near an
active thermal vent by submersible "Shinkai 6505".
The purpose of this experiment is to monitor nature
of thermal vent activity just at neighbor of vent by
seismic tools and measure the potential of backarc
rifting process of the south Mariana Trough.
Identifying earthquakes beneath the seamount could
be a good measure for tectonic activity if it exists.
By use of submersible, it is realized to set OBS at a
previously known thermal vent. Hydrophone is ex≫
pected to detect any volcanic T-phase signals if vol-
canic activity can generate. Although a hydro-
phone detects earthquakes, it can also sense pressure
variation because a hydrophone responds to water
pressure change. It is also expected to detect vol-
canic tremors if the seamount is close to the stage of
volcanic eruption.
2. Field Experiments
A digital ocean bottom seismometer called MOOBS
165
Pig, t Main (Solid diamond) and its aftershocks (solid circles) in August 6, 1993 obtained by PDE (USGS). al
Mariana for≪arc and Mariana baclurc. Bathymetry obtained by "Yokwuka* multi-narrow- teams during th≪
present study. Contours are each 200m.
(Magneto Optical Ocean Bottom Seismometer)
(Kasahara etal., 1992) was used. MOOBS has
three-component 2H2 seismometer (L-22E) and
one hydrophone as seismic sensors, and an MO disk
drive for data storage device. After digitising: seis-
mic signals by 16-tut A/D converter, seismic data are
stored in 256Kbyte temporary memory. MOOBS
has two recording modes, event picking and continu-
ous modes. In this experiment the continuous re-
cording mode was selected (or data-save except of
noisy period due to shaking by MO disk drive. The
sensitivities are 1.67 V/(cm/sec) and-8?dB/(V/
/rbar) (or-18? dB/(V/*iPa)) for seismometer and
hydrophone, respectively. Amplification factor for
all channels is 40dB and sampling rate is selected as
50H&. Response of amplifier is flat from DC to 30Hs.
Instead of using glass sphere for pressure housing of
OBS, an aluminum one was used in the viewpoint of
safety in order to avoid a sudden implosive collapse
of sphere, when "Shinkai 6600" carries an OBS,
Approximate deployment site was chosen by
referencing the previous dive ("Shinkai 6500" Dive
#161), where is the former active chimney location
on the seamount at 143°55'E. 13*23'N and depth of
1,500m. Before the deployment, the exact observa*
IS$
tion site was carefully selected using multi-narrow-
beam bathymetric map. Summit area (named
"SNAIL Haven") was chosen as the target site rather
than slope side because seamount slope is very steep
for OBS deployment. Altho ugh t he summit appears
as flat on multi-narrow-beam map within measure*
ment resolution, which is approximately 20m in
depth, the horizontal size is extremely small, nearly
80m square at depth of l,S00m. Later, a number of
"Sinkai 6500" dives reveaJed that the summit area is
very rough in the viewpoint of OBS deployment,
although we expect the fiat top with a sediment
cover. The deployment of OBS was performed by
R/V "Yokosuka", which is a support vessel of
"Shinkai 6500".
After the deployment of OBS, Kasahara, one of
authors, dove on the "SNAIL Haven" in order to
move the OBS ("Shinkai 6500" Dive, #1*3), but the
OBS was not found during his dive. It happened
that the OBS was found by a later dive (#185, by R.
Vrijenhoeh), just lm beside of an active thermal
vent. Temperature of the thermal vent was meas-
ured as 20?°C. An Alviniatncfia colony was found at
this vent (seen as white in Photo 1). Alvinkoncha
is a kind of snail family and first found in the north
JAMSTEC J. D≪ep Sea Fte., 10 ()9M)
Mariana thermal vent by Alvin. Because sitting
pose of 08$ seemed too unstable to fulfill function as
seismometer, it was decided better to move OBS to
more stable place. Although a location, where
should be wide and stable enough to reset the 08$,
was sought around the vent by "Shinkai". there were
so few. Finally. OBS was fixed at one tee&tiori at the
30m south of the previous site by dive # 185. Seel n g
the video tapes taken by #189 dive, the sitting shape
st the first site is better than the second one, OBS
records, however, showed that two horizontal seis-
mometers ace almost dead at the first site, and one
horizontal seismometer is extremely unstable at the
second sitfc showing low-frequency (ca. 0.3Hz) os≪
cilia lion with large amplitude.
The 7 daj's record was obtained from J?; & (local
=GMT+ 8 hours) of October 17 to 11:05 (local) of
October 25, 1993. The OBS was located at
143*55.241' E. IS0 23.615' K and depth ol 1.4?0m.
During the diving study, the multi-narrow- beam
bathymetric survey was carried out by R/V
"Yokosuaka".
3. Results
Data, however, have some losses at savins due to
malfunction of MO disk drive. Amount of data ob-
tained is nea≫y one third c4 the total periods during
one week. By visual examination of video tapes
obtained by "Shinkai 6500", basement of the summit
region is extremely rough in the viewpoint of OBS
landing point The bottom surface of seamount is
covered by mass of pillow lava, specially at the
summit region and along seamount slope. There
were only a few locations covered with thin sedi≫
mente near the summit. There no tfiermat vente
at this flat region. OBS was found at the location
fust 1m beside of an active thermal vent (called
'Geo-phonic vent" site, Photo 1) by "Shinkai 6500"
Dive (#185, by R. Vrijenhoeh) in the narrow
summit region with 30m square. Pillows are ap-
proximately 80cm to 1 m In diameter and form 1- 2
m up and down topographic change. A biological
colony oi Ah/iniconcha was seen at the "Geo-phonic"
thermal vent. Smearing of water was also observed
JAMSTEC J, De@D Sea Res., 10 {1934)
at the vent during dive #185. By several dives, it
was observed that the vents are forming a lineament
and distributed along nearly N-5 strike near the
western wall side of summit.
One hundred and thirty seismic events were ob-
served during 8 days period. Fig. $ shows S-P time
distribution of events. Most of S-P times are dis-
tributed between 10 and 50 seconds. None of events,
which occurred inside of this seamount were found.
The S-P time for the nearest event is ca. 3-4 seconds.
The P and S readings of events were compared to the
fist prepared by USGS Guam station CP.Hactori. per*
sonal communication), where is located at approxi*
mateJy 90km east of the CBS, and the results indicate
very few events having earlier arrivals than in
Guam. Examples of earthquake records are shown
in Fig. 4.
During the current observation, numerous pulse
shape events are recorded only on hydrophone trace,
hereafter, these are called "pressure event(s)", be*
cause these are picked by pressure censor (hydro*
phone), and none of pressure pulses were identified
on seismometer traces even for the largest pulses.
Pig. 6 shows three examples of pressure events.
The characteristic period of pressure pulses is 90
seconds to 1 minute. The MEM spectrum also
shows the same characteristics as visual inspection
(Pig. 6). It is also confirmed that hydrophone
worked correctly seeing natural earthquake records.
167
Sequential nunBw of ≪vert≫
S-P tirne distribution of earthquakes observed.
$-P seconds in vertical and sequential number of
events in horizontal.
Fig 4 Example oi natural earthquakes. Channel I <top trace): vertical; channel 2: homontal #1, channel &
horizontal #2 aod channel 4 (bottom trace) : hydrophone. Vertical relative scales are shown far below after
channel number. Tick on vertical scale corresponds to 5.3roV voltage scale. Two honaontels are near)y dead
due lo Inclined OBS settlement at ale I. (a) Nearest earthquake with 6S5 seconds for (oil length and Cb)
with 40 seconds for full length at site I, (c) further distant earthquake with 655 seconds at site 2 and (d)
low frequency noise observed at site 2 with 40 seconds (or full length. Vertical scalcs axe 4, 1024, 4 and 16
from top to bottom. Extremely large noise on horizontal #1 is due to unstable OBS settlement.
At the second site, mimDer of pressure pulses and
specially amplitude of them quickly decreased.
Pressure pulses tend to stiow negative first breaks.
The above results strongly suggest that pressure
pulses were generated by episodic and rapid up well-
ing of hot water generated by the "Geo-phonic vent",
168
not by smooth and continuos smearing. Negative
first break might indicate local pressure decrease by
Ihis upwelling. Pig. 7 shows the time sequence of
pressure pulses. Although the record is not com-
pletely continuos, only we can say it docs not show
an clear periodic nature except there is a possibility
JAMSTec J. De≫p See Res.. 10 41994}
Fig. 5 Examples c/ pressure events. Note on vertical scale difference between channels 1 and 4:6 and 128.
respectively. Polarity for hydrophone is negative for up.
of 1 day or 12 hours period icily.
4. Discussions
It, however, is necessary to examine whether pres-
sure pulses can be observed by seismometer or not.
Typical amplitude ratio between vertical seismome-
ter and hydrophone at 2-8 Hz is approximately 2.5 :
1 as seen in Fig. 4. During low frequency oscillation
period seen in Fig. 4 (d>, the ratio of vertical seis-
mometer and hydrophone decreased to I :4 at 3.5
seconds. This amplitude decrease can be explained
by low frequency response of 2 Hi seismometer be-
cause sensitivity of 2 Hi seismometer at 4 seconds is
1/8 of that at 2 Hz. The observed ratio is nearly this
level Considering this effect, the sensitivity at 32
seconds is approximately 1/64 of 2Hs. The observed
amplitude of pressure pulse is 1.2V seen in Pig. S.
This corresponds to 0.02V at vertical seismometer
channel. Because this is five times greater than
noise level (4mV) on vertical channel, pressure
U9
Fig. 6 An example of MEM spectrum oi pressure events.
Peak fit 30 second*! mln corresponds to pressure
pulses.
pulse should be seen if these are seismic nature.
Pressure pulses with much larger amplitude are also
net identified on vertical channel. Horizontal #2
channel has much larger amplitude than of vertical
channel when it is active as seen in Fig. 4. This also
supports no evidence of pressure events on horizon-
tal #2 channel. If pressure pulses are generated by
pressure change of surrounding water due to local
up welling of hot (or warm) water from the vent,
the above observation can be explained. It is also
supported by the evidence that change of OBS's loca-
tion shows drastic decrease of number and amplitude
of events The nature that most of pressure pulses
have negative first breaks seems difficult to happen
for acoustic signals. If pressure pulses are shaking
noise caused by unstable sitting pose, these should
be observed simultaneously by seismometers- All
of observations suggest that pressure pulses are not
acoustic signals, but are generated by upwelling of
hot water from the thermal vent intermittently and
the circulation of water generates negative pressure
change at the location of OBS, It is not likely that
seismic oscillation such as in Fig. 4 (d) is volcanic
170
Fl?, 7 Time sequence o( pressure evenu. In the middle
of observation. DBS w≪ moved ty 'SKinhai 6S00*.
Negative procure means decrease of pressure.
Note mo&t 0/ pulses with negative fkrsi break.
tremors generated by volcanism. The most possible
cause for such oscillation is bottom water currents.
Using multi-narrow-beam bathymetry data (un-
published data) taken by the current "Yokosuka"
cruise combined with the results of cruise in 1993
(Camo ctal., 1993), the detailed topographic maps
(Figs. 8 and 9) were generated for south of Mariana
Trough and Mariana forearc region, respectively.
In Fig. 8 (a), there are two different kinds of topo-
graphic lineaments, the on* with NNE-SSW strike
located in the westward and the other with echelon
like lineaments crossing: seamounts with N-S strike
located in the eastward. Westward lineamen t corre-
sponds to the axis of Mariana Trough. The other
group of lineaments exactly corresponds to the ther-
mal vent chain found by a series of the current dives
(e,g. #18S) just on the summit of 'SNAIL Haven*
seamount. The eastside lineament is a little wider
width between 13*25' and 13*40'. N-S trend is also
noticed just on the seamount at 13 ° 10' (
"Usagiyama* seamount). At this seamount one of
"Shinkai 6500* dive (#191. Ms. Masuda) found
hydrothermal yellowish deposits along one of very
steep walls, which cut the seamount by N-S strike.
The yellowish deposits are clear evidence of
hydrothermal activity (Masuda, personal communi-
cation). The Usagiyama seamount is cut by an an*
JAMSTEC J. Deep Sea Res.. 10 (19M)
Pjg. 6 Bathymetry map of Marina Trough, 'a) 50m contours And (b) color map with 200>n contours, N-S faults cutsubmarine volcanos in ihc middle of mapping soon In (a). Mariana Trough a*is runs with NNE-SSW siriko
in ihc tcft side of tho map. B-W linentions across a scamounl (U$a≪iyame) in 13s 10'
JAMSTEC J. DHp Sm fits。1011994} /77
Fig. 9 Batymetric map or Mariana lore arc region with 100m contoure. The area corresponds to main and
aftershocks of August 8.1993 event.
other lineament with the strike of E-W around
13*10'. This seems a conjugate fault set of N-$
lineaments In the south of 13° 10', the Mariana
trough aits changes the strike westward. The N-S
strike of eastward lineament is slightly different
from the one of westward lineament which has been
thought as spreading axis. The N-$ strike linea-
ment is similar to the main strike of the middle and
north Mariana Trough.
OBS at so called "SNAIL Haven" seamount
recorded numerous pressure pulses, which are es-
timated as evidence of pressure decrease due to
hydcathermal upweUiag. The seamount is located
13km eastward of the south Mariana Trough arid it is
cut by N-S trend fault found in the bathymetric map.
The observation of pressure pulses matches with the
observation of high temperature <207"C> at "Geo-
phonic venl". at 1 m distance from OBS. Any earth-
quakes beneath the seamount, however, were not
observed during 7 days period, suggesting rather
low intensity volcanism occurring on this seamount
caused by the faulting activtt?* This might suggest
that the eastward lineament is a kind of presently
active rifting zone. The rifting stage of the east
lineament seems very Juvenile or extinction stage.
172
Acknowledgments
This project was carried out by a pari of
JAMSTEC "Shinkai 6500' dive operations. The pre-
sent authors give their great thanks for nice supports
by people of JAMSTEC, crews and operational stuffs
gt submersible "Shiokai 6500". awl captala and his
crews of R/V "Yokosuka". Multi-narrow-beam
maps were obtained by R/V ■Yofcosuka" of
JAMSTEC during the leg. Bathymeteric maps
were generated by GMT mapping software de-
veloped by University of Hawaii.
References
Bibee, LD., C.G. Shor, Jr. and R.S. Lu (1980) : inter-
arc spreading in the Marina Trough. Maine Geol-
ogy, 35,133-197.
Craig, Y,, K, Horibe, A. Farfey, J.A. Welhan. K-R. Kim
and R N, Hey (1987) : Hydrothermal vents in the
Marina Trough; results of the first ALVIN dives.
Eos Trans., AGU, 68, p< 1531.
OawiO.T. and Shipboard Scientific party ot the Y9204
cruise (1993) : InterRidge News, 2 <1). 11-14
Hawkins, J.W., P.P. Lonsdale, J.D. Macdougall and A
M. Volpe (1990) : Petrology of the axial ridge of
the Mariana Trough ftackarc spreading center.
Earth Planet. Sci Letter. 100,226-250.
Hussoftg, DM. and J.B, Sinton (1982) : 'Seismicity
JAMSTEC J. Ow $4i R*$., 10 (1994)
associated with back arc cruatal spreading in the
central Mariana Trough." p 217-295. In: Tectonic
and geological evolution of southeast Asia seas
and islands, Part 2. Edited by D.E, Hays.
Karig, D.E. <1971) i Structural history of the Man*
ana island arc system. Geol. Sot Am. Bull., 83,
323-344.
Kasahara, J., K. Mochifuki, T. Sato, S. Koresawa and
T, Matsubara (1992): A new digital OBS
(MOOBS) using MO disk and the depth depend*
ence of noise spectrum on deep sea floor ob-
tained by this. AGU Fall Meeting.
Kasahara. J, L. Kong, S. Koresawa. C. Igarashi T.
Yamaguchi, M Suzuki and R. F≪ng-Lu (1998):
Seismic observation at the Mariana Trough 18R N
and its relation to the detailed bathymetry. Pre*
liminary Report of the Hakuho-Maru Cruise KK
92-1, Ocean Research Institute, University of
Tokyo, 77-98.
JAMSTEC J. D* ≫p S●● R●S・, 10(1994 )
Kasahara, 0 . H. Utada aud H. Kmoshila (1994):
Reuse of submarine cable for seismic and
geoelectrical measurements Oceans 94 Proceed*
in* I-T08-m
Kong, L, N. Seama, R Fujimoto, J. Kasahara and KH
92-1 shipboard scientific party (1992): Segmen-
tation of the Mariana Trough back-arc spread-
ing center at 18N. interRidge News, 1,2-5.
Searoa, N. and T. Fujiwara (1993) ? Geomagnetic
anomalies in the Mariana Trough. 18N. Pre)imi>
nary Report of the Hafcuho-Maru Cruise KH92-1.
Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo.
70-73.
Sugi, Y. (199$) : Abstract of Japanese seismological
Society Fall Meeting.
(Manuscript received 30 June 1994)
(Nottce) Photos are given on the following page.
173
174
(a)
(b)
Pholol OBS b ≪・sidc or lk・rmal VC'lll r Gt刃|)h りnic sitc“}surroundcd by
pillow 1av;i. Alviniconcha co1 り111い 肬・t'11 as whiu*. QI)ドnr vil・w ilnd
山I near view.
JAMSTEC J. Dnp Sea Res.. 10 1199ね