7/29/2019 Ltr PAO Cochin 29.8.2013

1/3

/

7/29/2019 Ltr PAO Cochin 29.8.2013

2/3

2. "3) The MACP Scheme known as "FloDtFtED ASSURED cAhEER pnoenssstoN

S}HEME (MAcPs) F?R,THE 1ENTRAL coVRENItENt ctwLtAN pilptovres,,has been norifedvlde the DOP&T O.M. No;35034/3/2008-EStt.(D) dated 19.d5.2009. Para g of the jaid OM hasinskucted that the scheme is operatioriai ry.e:f 01.09,id08. ;The ielevant benterice in ftrels{fu para $isreproduced herein for easy reference; t,The bchemd wotrld nr 6peratiortal Urc , ln otherwords, financial upgradations as per the pi;lprovisions oi t{re earlier AcP scheme (of {uf ust, 1999)'|i - -, -l-- -l-'--'-'-t -:"-"''.j.would be granted tlll 31.08.2008." As pef fara 3 of the lodpaf OM, th6 details of the ilnbp s.t "r"nd conditions for grant 9f financlal rrpgHoa'tiJni unoer tn{ s{nerni are otve irr nHr're*un{-ri ,t--,' ' i"',

{rf-

Ir 'itllt,,lrlrr,.ii

4', As per the ANNEXI,|I{H*il ioi tti" setd i CP erne para 28 b trnOel' lltustrationsr::lbeloW for easy rdferencb

clarifies the possition that there would be no effect on grant on 'N6n-functi$hal Scate- in pB-2 with grade ipay of Rs' 5400/- during the period between otiot.rooO to 31.8.2b08, as tire same is not countea Jnoe, iACP Scheme of 1999. ln the light of these facts, to come to a negative conclusion based on certainsentences occurening in the clarlflcations lss.lrsd on the subject would be unfair to ,,slmllarly placedofficers' mentioned in para 2 above.who had got their 2nd finartcial upgradation under the erstwhile ACpScheme on or before 31.08.2008.

t plhced officei"" {*imentioned i::ll-lo.A:23011t29t2010$d.il A dated :subjlct. Since'the dr$.., MAcp ,abovg, the objectionlr{iseo by the Io ietrospective:rppfibnltion prior to i' ' ined urL hrpartrnent Ihohadfo! tt , $994, in ,KeralaiZoni trnr coutd ill0g, and hence not leligibte for ilvin such ,cfls$ piovisibns of para i.tI Pay P,,8'2 5400 andi PB-3 5400 i',ine and iit would offset financial iir predent context could not b* j

,iabove, However in respect of Iry's clarifications dated 20,0b.2011 i

tsPAO Calicut would not be tenable as the seid01.09.2008. There are lnstances whereirr cbras Direct Recruit lnspector of Central ExCiscomplete thelr 24 years of regular servibefinancial upgradation under the erstwhile A(

I8.1 of the DOPT OM ls attracted. ln their crwould be .counted separate upgradation unupgradation under the MACP seheme andcategorized as'similarly placed Officers, I

i"similarly situtated Superintendents" mentioned

iilirtain Sunerlr{tenddnts rse an or aftdr 01rbg,lge: on oi attef ol,ilg,eorGP Scheme.' Henie, in:ases the NFSG Giradender the MACP SitremI j such officers irJ il,,rnentioned in pafa zin para 2 above, Ministrr

i8) The objection to 3'd financial upgradation under MACP Scheme to sipitarty ptaceOofficers in the Grade Pay Rs. 6600/- was first raked up by the PAO, Calicut. ffris Oftde as Cadre:Controlling Cbmmissionerate for Kerala Zone does not sublcribe to the pAO Calicut's oUj{olions tor ttre

reasons mentioned in the letters deted 01/04/20ta, eolozlzof a &zzto}tzolSwith the er "f"[t controilerof Accounts/Chief Controller of Accounts office. This omc{ nas taken up the mattdr wit{ {fre principalChief Controller of Accounts/ Chief Controllbi Accounts , r.r"l* o"tt'i, fpr necessary "o"o"lnf,o finatity in, ".

"2[i. llluptiatie-ns i i i i. lllustrations ; i I ;l--c. lf a Goveinment Servdnt has been igr[ntedi either two regular prom$ti$nsor second financiai ;upgradation iurlrOer tt"r" ACP 'schtme 'ol A,lg{r;i1 secold financia! ;upgradation i urlrOer tt"'" ACP 'Schlme 'of Atlg{st,1999 after cornpletion of 24 yebrf of fegular service then onli lg'ifinancial upgradation; would be admlssible to him under the MACI{-Sioncompletion of 30 yebrb of servicb [rovided that he has not edrr{eOthird prornotion ih, thd hlerarc'hy,'l

7/29/2019 Ltr PAO Cochin 29.8.2013

3/3

{, J-._the matter. Frequent withholding, cutting and releaslh! of the officers arreari in inelevant objectionshave caused untold hardships to such officers, besides the deljyed payments have' unsettled their

1;l

i!l

i

iI

ef&utr

itgr

o,tord

rcipal Chie'07/20T3 {tter withotsanctionin

:r letter Nc:r rbgard t

IGA Dateprecipitat

J 'officers

i;Priitdhi

4',i{.c1n,rle

Gt.pk

up with the01t04t2013,

dction ln thisrne thet ' th:

hrsielarlftce'rliii ict po$ition,rit22li20i2 cre ,2 aboVe.'t:isintilarlf pl,

takertdatd{.nitale

'Sefrer,l:

i;lli6r Irillc'odre:lo.ll/bgi.rrn pa

:is of r'

personal tax planning indefinitely. SirController of Accounts, New Delhi ir2UAB2013, the PAO may be reque3ttfirst .substantiating the. .authority (authority/competent authority had )ri6l?

I

i7.) lt ls also relevahtGoordlExpdUMAGPiz0 12-13/328 ilatthe speclfic clarlfication raised b01.02.2013 ln respect of the "simitaaction at this stage by the PAO, p

Since the matter has already U{en fin this office letters bf ievert tp iOsted to delist from takin{ dny p'ie.!porl pror{rsitilrs of ,h4 t\ oCn 1'

'latdd; Il,,oi,*rl ir,rn",o,, J,j,i #,[,d,iatr& o#,ohlrorl has JtJrine[' iJi"i ,uv ltHJ f c chenna'i iltt'ii dir.,'oitarlir ptU4"d offleers"' nfrntipndd iparticqlatl[1' in reiation itd tnei .rf",

mentioned in para 2 ol this letter would u, uhwarranted qn{ tnconfine to the Prechecks and Post Check$ ploiedures as: sfipuManual vol I and to bring to light any impioirilgty committe! u

Encl: Copy of letters of even no dated 11412013iawith enclosures( letter dated 22.8.2O1b alfd I 81 ;7.2013endorsed)!!r

:it!,iIt!r!iiI ::irli:,; : t.l;;.I'l!'. I;t

l

Encll as Above,Copy submltted to:-

Copy to : L The Addltlonal Commlssloner of Central Eialse ahi, Cristoms, GCO Gochlri(for lnforffiatlon)2. The Addltlondl Commlssioner of Customs Preventlve bomnils3lunerate, Cochin{for ftrformatlonf3. The Addltlonal Commlssloner of central Exclse dnd CustomS, Korhlkocle Commissloherate whomay tak6 up thls ftaltdr wlth the PAO Calicut.4.Admlnlstfatlveofflcer|DDolCochlnfoilnformatlon u,K

H SINGHSSIONEReopsh-rhy*f,%;(;##;m,L:/

II

faithfullyii

NGHrssloNER

coMI