nisqually thin project
DESCRIPTION
Presentation Given By: Kevin Senderak and Ken Wieman, US Forest Service at Gifford Pinchot National ParkTRANSCRIPT
Nisqually Thin Project
Public Comment Period:
• Informa;on Exchange
• Documenta;on of concerns and opportuni;es from the public
Management Direc;on:
• Gifford Pinchot Na;onal Forest Land and Resource Management Plan
• Northwest Forest Plan
Other Documents:
• Nisqually Watershed Analysis
• Late-‐Successional Reserve Assessment
Consul;ng Par;es
• Collaborators—Pinchot Partners
• Federal Agencies • US Fish and Wildlife Service
• Na;onal Marine Fisheries Service
• Tribes • Cowlitz • Nisqually • Puyallup • Squaxin Island • Yakama
Nisqually River
Mesatchee Ckk
Restora;on Opportuni;es
1. Dispersed Recrea;on
2. Road Management
3. Stream and Riparian Reserve Restora;on
4. Wildlife Habitat Enhancement
1. Dispersed Recrea;on
Restora;on Goals and Priori;es
• Reduce illegal ac;vi;es (dumping)
• Reduce ground disturbing ac;vi;es around
sensi;ve areas
• Reduce site expansion
Illegal dumping and site expansion
Ground Disturbance and Erosion
Dispersed Recrea;on: Treatment
• Motorized Vehicle Control
• Foot Traffic Management
• Sanita;on Management
• Law Enforcement
• Environmental Educa;on
• Respect the River -‐ Stream Guardians
Restora;on Goals
• Provide passage for aqua;c organisms (fish, amphib)
• Maintain natural stream transport func;on (sed., wood)
• Pass peak flows (Q100)
• Reduce road related sediment delivery
• Maintain hydrologic process (base flows, peak flows)
• Reduce fragmenta;on of interior wildlife habitat
• Increase big game habitat security
2. Road Management
Current Road Condi;on – Rd. Density (mi/mi sq)
4.5
3.6 3.8
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Berry Big Cah
Average Road Density by Subwatershed
Total
Big Berry Cah
Rd Den
sity (m
i/mi sq)
Nisqually Watershed Analysis 1999 GPNF Cumula;ve Effects Assessment 1988
Current Road Condi;on – Road Miles
45
61 59
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Berry Big Cah
Road Distance (m
i)
Subwatershed
Nisqually Road Miles by Subwatershed
Total
Current Road Condi;on – Stream Crossings
73
150
230
0 50
100 150 200 250
Berry Big Cah Stream
Crossings (cou
nt)
Subwatershed
Nisqually Stream Crossings by Subwatershed
Total
Road Management Opportuni;es Road Analysis Recommenda;ons
Poten;al Condi;on Recommended Road Treatment (mi)
Aqua Risk CS DE OH RT Grand Total
High 0.5 3.2 1.9 1.3 6.9
Medium 8.7 6.6 3.1 18.4
Low 0.3 0.3
Grand Total 9.5 9.8 5.0 1.3 25.6 CS – Close Stabilize DE – Decommission OH – High Clearance vehicle RT – Roads to Trails
GPNF Roads Analysis 2002
Culvert upgrade
Berry Creek -‐FR 5200
Big Unnamed Trib -‐FR 8500
Culvert Upgrade
Big Creek -‐ FR 8420
Nisqually Fish Passage Objec;ves
Well-graded native streambed sediment mix, channel forms natural substrate and habitat
Culvert bed width bankfull width or wider
Road surface
Stream bed
Substrate covers the channel bottom
May have distinct banks
Culvert gradient aligned to simulate natural channel slope
Cross section view Profile view
Flow Flow
No scale
USDA Forest Service Cowlitz Valley Ranger District Project: Nisqually Stewardship Subject: Typical embedded culvert Date: October 9, 2012 Design: Ken Wieman
Road fill
Fish Passage Example Poten;al outcome
Road Management Opportuni;es
FR 5222016
FR 8400059
3. Stream and Riparian Reserves
Riparian Reserve = 180-360 ft
1- 2 Site Potential Tree Ht.
Cross Section Not to Scale
360 k
• Stream corridor, wetlands, unstable areas, • Site Poten;al Tree Height
• Stream Class I-‐II = 1 SPTH • Stream Class III-‐IV = 2 SPTH
• Not scheduled for ;mber harvest , LSR objec;ves
Plan View Not to Scale
I-‐II III-‐IV
180 k
Riparian Reserve Management
Riparian Reserve = 180-360 ft
1-2 Site Potential Tree Ht.
Cross Section Not to Scale
Goal:
• Decrease water temp
• Increase diversity
• Increase wildlife habitat
• Increase fish habitat
• ̀ `
Riparian Reserve – Current Condi;on
Riparian Reserve = 180-360 ft
1- 2 Site Potential Tree Ht.
Cross Section Not to Scale
• Overstock managed stand (300-‐400 TBP) • Homogeneous
Plan View Not to Scale
I-‐II III-‐IV
Riparian Reserve Management
Riparian Reserve = 180-360 ft
1- 2 Site Potential Tree Ht.
Cross Section Not to Scale
• Release select trees (5-‐10 TBP) • Manage for species diversity and structural diversity
Plan View Not to Scale
Riparian Reserve Management
```
Riparian Reserve = 180-360 ft
1-2 Site Potential Tree Ht.
• Harvest (20-‐25 TPA)
Plan View Not to Scale
Cross Section Not to Scale
Riparian Reserve Management
Riparian Reserve = 180-360 ft
1-2 Site Potential Tree Ht.
Cross Section Not to Scale
Riparian Reserve = 180-360 ft
1-2 Site Potential Tree Ht.
Cross Section Not to Scale
Objec;ves:
• Increase shade trees
• Develop minor species
• Increase down wood, snags
• Increase instream large wood
• ̀ `
Riparian Reserve Treatment Objectives
Instream Restora;on
Instream Restora;on – Goals & Objec;ves
Cah Creek (2011)
Goal
• Restore and fish habitat • Restore water quality • Monitor ecological effec;veness
Objec;ves
• Restore LW (>100 pc/RM, >24” dbh.)
• Restore bank stability (>80% ,4 mi)
• Accelerate veg. dvlpmt (140 ac)
• Increase stream shade (80%)
Instream and Riparian Restora;on
Mesatchee Creek
Berry Creek
Instream and Riparian Restora;on
Big Creek
4. Wildlife Habitat Restora;on
Wildlife Listed Species– Management Opportuni;es
Marbled Murrelet Nest Tree
Spohed Owl Nes;ng Foraging Habitat
Wildlife Habitat
Habitat Security
Interior Habitat Fragmenta;on
Elk Calving Area Management