optymalizacja smrd paweł przewłocki warszawska grupa neutrinowa
Post on 21-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
Optymalizacja SMRDOptymalizacja SMRD
Paweł Przewłocki Paweł Przewłocki Warszawska Grupa NeutrinowaWarszawska Grupa Neutrinowa
Eksperyment T2K (Tokai2Kamioka)Eksperyment T2K (Tokai2Kamioka)
Akcelerator, tarcza grafitowa
tunel rozpadowy
Monitor mionów
Stacja ND280
Stacja 2kmSuperKamiokande
ND280 off-axis
N-GRID on-axis
p
140m0m 280m 2 km 295 km
Start: 2009Start: 2009
The problemThe problem
Side Muon Range Detector – measures muon Side Muon Range Detector – measures muon direction and momentum direction and momentum
Important for neutrino interactions and cosmic-Important for neutrino interactions and cosmic-ray muons (for calibration)ray muons (for calibration)
We have 15 layers of gaps suitable for We have 15 layers of gaps suitable for scintillator slabsscintillator slabs
But the number of slabs is limited. Therefore we But the number of slabs is limited. Therefore we have to optimize their configuration in order to have to optimize their configuration in order to maximize our measurement capabilities.maximize our measurement capabilities.
Nd280 off-axis detector – side viewNd280 off-axis detector – side view
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Rings:
15 layersPOD TPC TPC TPC
Front viewFront view
Left lateral part Right lateral part
Upper part
Bottom part
Our ends…Our ends…
Cosmic-ray muon considerations – Piotrek’s Cosmic-ray muon considerations – Piotrek’s presentationpresentation
My area of interest –measurement of muons My area of interest –measurement of muons from neutrino interactionsfrom neutrino interactions
Muons are mainly measured by TPC – SMRD is Muons are mainly measured by TPC – SMRD is important for events that cannot be handled by important for events that cannot be handled by TPCTPC
Question: what is the optimal SMRD layout to Question: what is the optimal SMRD layout to measure muons that cannot be seen in TPC?measure muons that cannot be seen in TPC?
……And meansAnd means
Let’s look at the numbers of the outermost Let’s look at the numbers of the outermost layer reached by muons that are of our layer reached by muons that are of our interestinterest
The tools:The tools: Geant4 ND280MC simulationGeant4 ND280MC simulation Input: NEUT files on water (for the time being)Input: NEUT files on water (for the time being)
Outermost layer in SMRDOutermost layer in SMRD
60.000 events from FGD60.000 events from FGDEnergy deposition cut – must have at least 0.5MeV to be a Energy deposition cut – must have at least 0.5MeV to be a valid hit valid hit TPC distance cut – muon has to travel maximum 60cm in TPC distance cut – muon has to travel maximum 60cm in TPC (longer tracks are reconstructed in TPC and don’t TPC (longer tracks are reconstructed in TPC and don’t need any additional info from SMRD)need any additional info from SMRD)„„QE” events definition:QE” events definition:
One muonOne muon No pizerosNo pizeros No pipluses over 200MeV in energyNo pipluses over 200MeV in energy
In some cases I split the SMRD intoIn some cases I split the SMRD into lateral and upper/bottom parts to lateral and upper/bottom parts to show the influence of the coil show the influence of the coil (present only on top and bottom (present only on top and bottom of the basket) of the basket)
Outermost layer distributionOutermost layer distribution60cm TPC distance cut applied
Red – lateral smrdBlack – lateral + upper/bottom
Lateral parts are more populated
All
QE
Lateral
Lateral + upper/bottom
Lateral
Lateral + upper/bottom
Outermost layer - upper vs bottom Outermost layer - upper vs bottom
60cm TPC distance cut appliedOnly bottom/upper part of smrd
Red – bottom smrdBlack – upper+bottom
Much more tracks go to the bottom part
Some statisticsSome statistics
All: Percentages with respect to All: Percentages with respect to allall mu CCmu CC events events
QE: percentages with respect to QE: percentages with respect to all mu CC qeall mu CC qe evts evts
Outermost Outermost over 4over 4
Outermost Outermost over 5over 5
Outermost Outermost over 6over 6
allall 2.94%2.94% 2.11%2.11% 1.53%1.53%
With 60cm TPC distance cut appliedWith 60cm TPC distance cut applied 1.97%1.97% 1.43%1.43% 1.02%1.02%
With distance cut applied, only rings #7 With distance cut applied, only rings #7 and 8and 8
1.6%1.6% 1.19%1.19% 0.87%0.87%
Outermost Outermost over 4over 4
Outermost Outermost over 5over 5
Outermost Outermost over 6over 6
allall 2.16%2.16% 1.44%1.44% 0.94%0.94%
With 60cm TPC distance cut appliedWith 60cm TPC distance cut applied 1.48%1.48% 1.02%1.02% 0.67%0.67%
With distance cut applied, only rings #7 With distance cut applied, only rings #7 and 8and 8
1.15%1.15% 0.83%0.83% 0.55%0.55%
Conclusions – proposed module Conclusions – proposed module distributiondistribution
Table prepared by Thomas Kutter based on results presented here and some other studies
BackupBackup
Incoming nu energy distributionsIncoming nu energy distributions
Black – all eventsRed – with 60cm TPC dist cut appliedBlue – as above + reaching smrd
All
QE
Incoming nu energy distributionsIncoming nu energy distributions
Black – TPC dist cut + reaching smrdRed – at least 4 layersBlue – at least 5 layersGreen – at least 6 layers
All
QE