outlook for the u.s. lodging industry - hospitality net · pdf fileoutlook for the u.s....
TRANSCRIPT
ESTO
Outlook for the U.S. Lodging IndustryDuane VinsonVice President
Smith Travel Research
MOF
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009
Supply % Change
Demand % Change
Total United StatesRoom Supply & Demand Percent ChangeTwelve Month Moving Average – 1989 to September 2009
3.1%
- 6.6%
-1.1%
- 4.8%
▼▼
▼▼
▼▼ ▼
▼▼▼
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Occupancy (%)ADR ($)
Peak $107.21Sept 2008
$99.30Sept 2009
Peak 64.7%Jan 1997 55.7%
Sept 2009
Total United StatesOccupancy and ADRTwelve Month Moving Average – September 2009
8.7
4.9
9.2
-1.5
7.2
1.3
-4.0 -4.7
-1.6
-12.5
-4.4
-8.4
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
Luxury UpperUpscale
Upscale Mid w F&B Mid wo F&B Economy
SupplyDemand
Chain ScalesSupply/Demand Percent ChangeSeptember 2009 YTD
-11.8
-6.1
-10.9
-9.1
-11.1-9.8 -9.6
-11.7
-5.8
-17.1
-10.2
-5.2
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Luxury UpperUpscale
Upscale Mid w F&B Mid wo F&B Economy
OccupancyADR
Chain ScalesOccupancy/ADR Percent ChangeSeptember 2009 YTD
3.7
1.6
-8.0
3.1 3.03.0 3.8
-7.5-5.9 -6.0
-7.8
-5.6
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
Urban Suburban Airport Interstate Resort Small Metro
SupplyDemand
Location SegmentsSupply/Demand Percent ChangeSeptember 2009 YTD
-8.7
-1.4
-8.7
-10.5
-8.9
-11.5
-9.0-8.5
-10.5
-13.0
-2.5
-12.2
-15
-10
-5
0
5
Urban Suburban Airport Interstate Resort Small Metro
OccupancyADR
Location SegmentsOccupancy/ADR Percent ChangeSeptember 2009 YTD
US Regions – Occupancy, ADR, & RevPAR Percent ChangeSeptember 2009 YTD
Occupancy: ▼ -10.1%ADR: ▼ -10.9%
RevPAR: ▼ -20.0%
Occupancy: ▼ -12.4%ADR: ▼ -13.1%
RevPAR: ▼ -23.9%
Occupancy: ▼ -7.8%ADR: ▼ -3.3%
RevPAR: ▼ -11.0%
Occupancy: ▼ -13.0%ADR: ▼ -4.6%
RevPAR: ▼ -16.8%
Occupancy: ▼ -9.9%ADR: ▼ -7.9%
RevPAR: ▼ -17.1%
Occupancy: ▼ -8.5%ADR: ▼ -4.0%
RevPAR: ▼ -12.2%
Occupancy: ▼ -8.2%ADR: ▼ -7.3%
RevPAR: ▼ -14.8%
Occupancy: ▼ -9.1%ADR: ▼ -14.4%
RevPAR: ▼ -22.3%
Occupancy: ▼ -8.7%ADR: ▼ -7.4%
RevPAR: ▼ -15.3%
TOTAL USOccupancy: ▼ -9.9%
ADR: ▼ -9.1%RevPAR: ▼ -18.1%
-15
-10
-5
0
5
Detroit,
MI
Dallas
, TX
Atlanta,
GA
Los Angele
s-Long B
each
, CA
New O
rlean
s, LA
Minneapolis
-St P
aul, M
N-WI
Chicago, IL
Denver,
CO
Orlando, F
L
Houston, TX
Phoenix, A
Z
Seattle
, WA
Anaheim
-Santa
Ana, CA
Nashvil
le, TN
San D
iego, C
A
Boston, M
A
Total Unite
d States
San Fran
cisco/San
Mate
o, CA
Tampa-St P
etersb
urg, F
L
Philadelp
hia, PA-N
J
St Louis,
MO-IL
Oahu Is
land, HI
New York,
NY
Miami-H
ialea
h, FL
Norfolk-V
irginia B
each, V
A
Washington, D
C-MD-V
A
Top 25 MarketsRoom Demand Percent ChangeSeptember 2009 YTD
-20
-14
-8
-2
4
Detroit,
MIPhoenix,
AZ
Dallas
, TX
Houston, TX
Chicago, IL
Minneapolis
-St P
aul, M
N-WI
Atlanta,
GA
Los Angele
s-Long B
each
, CA
New O
rlean
s, LA
Denver,
CO
Miami-H
ialea
h, FL
San D
iego, C
A
Nashvil
le, TN
Seattle
, WA
Total Unite
d States
Orlando, F
L
Tampa-St P
etersb
urg, F
L
Anaheim
-Santa
Ana, CA
Boston, M
A
New York,
NY
St Louis,
MO-IL
Philadelp
hia, PA-N
J
San Fran
cisco/San
Mate
o, CA
Oahu Is
land, HI
Norfolk-V
irginia B
each, V
A
Washington, D
C-MD-V
ATop 25 MarketsOccupancy Percent ChangeSeptember 2009 YTD
-30
-20
-10
0
New Yor
k, NY
San Fr
ancis
co/San
Mate
o, CA
Phoen
ix, A
ZChic
ago,
IL
San D
iego,
CA
Miami-H
ialea
h, FL
Denve
r, CO
Oahu I
sland
, HI
Orland
o, FL
Los A
ngele
s-Long
Bea
ch, C
A
Minnea
polis
-St P
aul, M
N-WI
Bosto
n, MA
Anaheim
-San
ta Ana
, CA
Seattle
, WA
Philad
elphia
, PA-N
JDetr
oit, M
I
Total
Unit
ed Stat
esDall
as, T
XAtla
nta, G
A
Tampa
-St P
etersb
urg, F
L
Housto
n, TX
St Louis
, MO-IL
Nashvil
le, TN
New O
rlean
s, LA
Norfol
k-Virg
inia B
each
, VA
Washin
gton, D
C-MD-V
ATop 25 MarketsADR Percent ChangeSeptember 2009 YTD
-35
-20
-5
New York,
NY
Phoenix,
AZ
Chicago, IL
Detroit,
MI
San D
iego, C
ADen
ver, C
O
Miami-H
ialea
h, FL
Los A
ngeles-L
ong B
each
, CA
Minnea
polis-S
t Pau
l, MN-W
I
San Fran
cisco/San
Mate
o, CA
Dallas
, TX
Orland
o, FL
Seattle
, WA
Atlanta,
GA
Anaheim
-Santa
Ana, CA
Houston, T
XBosto
n, MA
Total Unit
ed Stat
es
Oahu Is
land, HI
New O
rlean
s, LA
Philad
elphia,
PA-NJ
Tampa-S
t Pete
rsburg
, FL
Nashvil
le, TN
St Louis,
MO-IL
Norfolk-V
irgini
a Bea
ch, V
A
Washing
ton, DC-M
D-VA
Top 25 MarketsRevPAR Percent ChangeSeptember 2009 YTD
Transient Business AnalysisLuxury/Upper Upscale ChainsPercent Change Sept YTD 2006 - 2009
2.3
-0.5
2.0
-4.0
-16.0
0.3
8.15.2
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
Demand ADR
2006 2007 2008 2009
Group Business AnalysisLuxury/Upper Upscale ChainsPercent Change Sept YTD 2006 - 2009
-4.8
0.0
4.4
-5.2
4.9
0.8
5.3
-15.0
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
Demand ADR
2006 2007 2008 2009
Group vs. Transient ADR % ChangeLuxury/Upper Upscale ChainsPercent Change Sept YTD 2006 - 2009
5.3 5.24.42
-5.2
-16
4.98.1
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
Group Transient
2006 2007 2008 2009
Group vs. Transient ADR Luxury/Upper Upscale ChainsSept YTD 2006 – 2009
$148.92
$156.16
$176.92
$143.84
$163.30
$172.30
$148.56 $148.82
$130
$150
$170
$190
Group Transient
2006 2007 2008 2009
$19.46
$23.38
$20.76
.26
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
Minneapolis-St P
aul, MN-W
I
Atlanta, G
A
Dallas, T
X
Orlando, F
L
New Orle
ans, LA
Phoenix, AZ
Chicago, IL
Philadelphia, P
A-NJ
San Francisco/San M
ateo, CA
Top 25 Markets
San Diego, CA
Los Angeles-Long Beach, C
A
Boston, MA
Washington, DC-M
D-VA
Oahu Island, H
I
New York, N
Y
Transient Group
Group vs. Transient ADR15 Select Markets September 2009 YTD
Total United StatesActive Development Pipeline - RoomsChange From Last Year
Source: STR / TWR / Dodge Construction Pipeline
-29.5%-236,989802,444 565,455Total
-22.5%-33,298147,854114,556Pre-Planning
-31.1%-203,691654,590450,899Active Pipeline
-26.9%-94,762351,652 256,890Planning
-32.6%-34,944107,23972,295 Final Planning
-37.8%-73,985195,699 121,714 In Construction
% ChangeDifferenceSeptember
2008September
2009Phase
22.3
28.2
33.0
36.9
54.2
62.8
0 12 24 36 48 60 72
Economy
Midscale w/out F&B
Midscale w/F&B
Upscale
Upper Upscale
Luxury
Months
Pipeline Projects by ScaleAverage Duration From Pre-Planning to Open
Source: STR / TWR / Dodge Construction Pipeline
0
50
100
150
200
250
2003/01 2004/01 2005/01 2006/01 2007/01 2008/01 2009/01-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
UC Rooms % Change
Total United StatesHotel Rooms Under Construction and Percent ChangeJanuary 2003 – September 2009
Under Construction room percentage change measured against same month, prior year.
Source: STR / TWR / Dodge Construction Pipeline
Total United StatesRooms In Construction by Scale – In Thousands September 2009
4.812.6
31.1
40.2
7.9 5.2
19.9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Luxury Upper Upscale Upscale Mid w F&B Mid w/o F&B Economy Unaffiliated
Source: STR / TWR / Dodge Construction Pipeline
Markets with Most Rooms In-ConstructionSeptember 2009
Market # Rooms % Existing Supply
New York 11,254 12.3
Las Vegas 7,011 4.4
Houston 4,561 6.7
Washington, DC 3,597 3.6
Dallas 3,272 4.3
Atlanta 3,195 3.4
LA-Long Beach 2,392 2.5
Source: STR / TWR / Dodge Construction Pipeline
Total United StatesNewly Abandoned Rooms by MonthSeptember 2008 – September 2009
468
214
451
579
280
1,473
1,169
1,775
422
2,768
1,162
417
854
933
989
1,389
1,631
320
2,926
2,853
4,977
1,613
4,393
6,295
4,523
1,987
2,193
2,931
2,162
1,819
2,139
1,748
512
406
5,711
1,713
2,867
1,372
1,141
7,481
1,383
1,375
426
144
967
498
482
161
450
413
496
161
Sep-08
Oct-08
Nov-08
Dec-08
Jan-09
Feb-09
Mar-09
Apr-09
May-09
Jun-09
Jul-09
Aug-09
Sep-09
In Construction Final Planning Planning Pre-Planning
3,383
7,838
5,087
5,754
10,8214,450
6,808
10,737
9,035
8,196
7,640
5,032
7,114
Source: STR / TWR / Dodge Construction Pipeline
Ten Largest Projects in the pipeline
Name Market Open Rooms Phase
• Aria Resort & Casino Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 12/16/09 4004 In Construction• Marriott Marquis Hotel Washington, DC 10/1/13 1167 Final Planning• JW Marriott Conv Ctr Hotel Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 3/10/11 1083 In Construction• Omni Dallas Dallas-Fort Worth, TX 3/1/12 1016 Final Planning• JW Marriott San Antonio San Antonio, TX 1/22/10 1002 In Construction• Myriad Botanical Resort Memphis, TN-MS-AR 9/1/11 1000 Planning• Marriott Marquis @ Music Cty Nashville, TN 6/30/13 1000 Planning• JW Marriott @ LA Live Los Angeles, CA 2/15/10 871 In Construction• Peabody Orlando Addition Orlando, FL 11/1/10 750 In Construction• Cosmopolitan Resort Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 7/1/10 708 In Construction
Source: STR / TWR / Dodge Construction Pipeline
352
507
729
506
843
683
350280
359
669
542
309
215217135
125
0100200300400500600700800900
1000
Number of Hotels Rooms (hundreds)
2002 2003 2004 20052006 2007 2008 2009Est
Total US - Closed HotelsAnnual 2002 through 2009 estimated
66,946 rooms in 2005 to 13,500 rooms in 2009
JQH: “not over developed, just under demolished”
-1.0-0.50.00.51.0
1.52.02.53.03.5
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 OND
Total United StatesRoom Supply Percent ChangeJan 2003 – Sep 2009 / Oct – Dec Forecast
Stuck at 3.2
-10
-5
0
5
10
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 OND
Total United StatesRoom Demand Percent ChangeJan 2003 – Sep 2009 / Oct – Dec Forecast
1.01.8 1.9
1.0
-1.8
1.3 1.32.6 3.0
0.21.3
0.4-0.1
2.80.5
-5.5
1.3
4.0
-8
-4
0
4
8
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009P 2010P 20 YrAverage
Supply % ChgDemand % Chg
Total United StatesSupply/Demand Percent Change2003 – 2010P
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 OND
Total United StatesOccupancy Percent ChangeJan 2003 – Sep 2009 / Oct – Dec Forecast
0.4
-0.6
0.3
-4.2
-0.2
3.62.9
-8.4-10
-5
0
5
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009P 2010P
Total United StatesOccupancy Percent Change2003 – 2010P
20 Year Average: -0.6%
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 OND
Total United StatesRoom Rate Percent ChangeJan 2003 – Sep 2009 / Oct – Dec Forecast
5.5
-9.7
-3.4
7.5
0.2
2.5
6.14.2
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009P 2010P
Total United StatesADR Percent Change2003 – 2010P
20 Year Average: 3.5%
86.41 91.17 104.09 106.84 96.43 93.1684.0785.30 98.0182.9682.82
$87.73$89.11
$91.15$93.57
$96.74
$99.86
$105.90$107.81$106.65
$85.30
$102.71
80
90
100
110
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
E20
10E
Nominal ADRYr 2000, Grown by CPI
If year 2000 ADR had increased by CPI each year…
Total US Room RatesActual vs. Inflation Adjusted2000 – 2010E
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
1988q1 1991q1 1994q1 1997q1 2000q1 2003q1 2006q1 2009q1
Demand % Chg
ADR % CHG
Total United StatesHotel Rooms Sold vs. ADR ChangeQuarterly Change – 1988 to Q4 2009E
-25-20-15-10-5
05
101520
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 OND
Total United StatesRevPAR Percent ChangeJan 2003 – Sep 2009 / Oct – Dec Forecast
7.8
-4.0
-17.1
5.7
-1.8
8.57.9
0.5
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009P 2010P
Total United StatesRevPAR Percent Change2003 – 2010P
20 Year Average: 2.9%
Takeaways
• Supply growth still an issue• Demand declines may be at or near bottom• ADR weakness continues • “Less Worse” 2H 2009• Moderate improvement 2010• Meaningful growth anticipated 2011