parity-transfer reaction for study of spin-dipole 0 modecomex5.ifj.edu.pl/slides/dozono.pdf · •...
TRANSCRIPT
Parity-transfer reaction for study of spin-dipole 0- mode
Masanori Dozono Center for Nuclear Study, the University of Tokyo
The 5th International Conference on “Collective Motion in Nuclei under Extreme Conditions” (COMEX5) 14-18 September 2015, Krakow
Scientific motivation
!
!
!
Spin-Dipole (SD) mode • (Isovector) SD operator !!• ΔL=1, ΔS=1, ΔT=1 • ΔJπ=0-, 1-, 2-
SD 0- mode (particular interest) • Carries quantum numbers of pion (Jπ=0-, T=1) • Reflects pion-like (tensor) correlations in nuclei
Protons Neutrons
・Anti-phase vibration between protons and neutrons (ΔL=1, ΔT=1) ・Spin-flip mode (ΔS=1)
Spin-isospin modes (ΔS=1,ΔT=1) in nuclei play an essential role in understanding of nuclear structure
M. N. Harakeh et al., “Giant Resonances”, Oxford, 2001 M. Ichimura et al., PPNP 56, 446 (2006).
Tensor effects on 0- strengths
Results of HF+RPA calc. • Tensor effects • 0- peak shifts by several MeV • Skyrme-type tensor int.
• Triplet-Even : Constrained by GT data • Triplet-Odd : NOT well constrained
C. L. Bai, H. Sagawa et al., PRC 83, 054316 (2011); Private communication
Triplet-Even (T)
Triplet-Odd (U)
0 10 20 30 40Excitation energy of 12B (MeV)
SD stren
gth (fm
2 /MeV
) (T,U) : (500,-350) : (600,0) : (650,200)
12C → 12B
SD 0-
SD 1-
SD 2-
0- distribution is sensitive to tensor ⇒ Exp. data of 0- are important to pin down tensor force effects
Experimental studies of 0- states
Exp. data of 0- are highly desired ⇒ Selective tool for 0- !
Red points are the nuclei in which some 0- states are identified.
Exp. information on 0- states is very limited
Figure by H. Okamura
Parity-transfer (16O,16F(0-)) reaction
!
Parity-trans. (16O,16F(0-)) • 16O (g.s., 0+) → 16F (g.s.,0‒)
Advantages • Selectively excite unnatural-parity states • No 1- contribution • Single Jπ for each ΔLR • Jπ (0-, 1+, 2-,...) can be assigned
only by the angular distribution (⇔ ΔLR)
Clean probe for SD 0- search
Parity-transfer reaction is selective tool for 0- !
16O, 0+ 16F, 0̶
0+ 0̶
(ΔLR=0)
Projectile
ΔJ = 0 Δπ = ̶ ΔLR
Target
Parity-trans. reaction
Parity-transfer (16O,16F(0-)) reaction
!
Parity-trans. (16O,16F(0-)) • 16O (g.s., 0+) → 16F (g.s.,0‒)
Advantages • Selectively excite unnatural-parity states • No 1- contribution • Single Jπ for each ΔLR • Jπ (0-, 1+, 2-,...) can be assigned
only by the angular distribution (⇔ ΔLR)
Clean probe for SD 0- search
Parity-transfer reaction is selective tool for 0- !
DWBA calculations with FOLD/DWHI
12B(0-), ΔLR=0 12B(1+), ΔLR=1 12B(2-), ΔLR=2
First parity-transfer measurement : 12C(16O,16F(0-))12B at 250 MeV/u
!
!
Why 12C ? • Known 0- at Ex=9.3 MeV in 12B⇒ Confirm effectiveness of parity-trans. reaction
• Experimentally more feasible • High luminosity, • Low B.G. compared with heavier nuclei
We apply parity-trans. reaction to 12C target
GOAL Establish parity-trans. reaction as a new tool for the 0- study
H. Okamura et al. PRC 66 (2002) 054602
12C(16O,16F(0-)) experiment @ RIBF & SHARAQ
Beam : Primary 16O • 250MeV/u, 107 pps (radiation limit) • Dispersive matched beam • (ΔP/P)beam ~ 0.1% • (x|δ)beamline = -10 m
Target : 12C • Segmented plastic scinti.
(active C target, 103.2 mg/cm2) • Determine beam x-position @ S0
(NOT used in present analysis)
Coincidence measurement of 16F -> 15O + p • 15O : 2 LP-MWDCs @ S2 • p : 2 MWDCs @ S1
80 mm
30 m
m
5 mm
Thickness 1mm (12C=103.2 mg/cm2)
SDQ D1
Q3
GEM D2
CRDC
S0S1
S2
12C
15O
p
SHARAQSpectrometer
16O
SHARAQ spectrometer
Segment scinti.
・Invariant-mass of 15O+p ⇒ Identify 16F(0-) ・Missing-mass ⇒ Deduce Ex in 12B and θ
16F -> 15O+p decay
16F
p
15OP16F
P15O
Ppθopen
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
660 680 700 720 740 760 780 800
10740
10760
10780
10800
10820
10840
10860
660 680 700 720 740 760 780 800 0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10740 10760 10780 10800 10820 10840 10860
15O momentum P15O (MeV/c)
15O momentum P
15O (MeV/c)
p momentum Pp (MeV/c)
p momentum Pp (MeV/c)
opening angle θopen (mrad)
opening angle θopen (mrad)
0-
p(16O,16F) at θreac < 6 mrad
Decay kinematics curves are clearly observed
proton angular acceptance
1-2-
Relative energy Erel vs Excitation energy Ex
• δErel = 80 keV (FWHM)⇒ Successfully identify 16F(0-) ! !
• δEx @ p(16O,16F) = 3 MeV (FWHM)(Include effect of kinematics curve)⇒ δEx ~ 2 MeV (FWHM)
15O+p
16F0-,g.s.
1-, 0.19 MeV
2-, 0.42 MeV
3-, 0.72 MeV
Excitation energy of 12B (MeV)-20 0 20 40
Relative energy (MeV)
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
Yield (a.u.)
Yield (a.u.)
θreac < 0.25o
p(16O,16F)
80 keV
3 MeV
Different structurecompared with (d,2He) • GT(1+) at 0 MeV
• Hindered
12C(16O,16F(0-))12B spectrum
Counts/1 MeV
dσ/dΩdE (mb/sr MeV)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
0 5 10 15 20 25Excitation energy of 12B (MeV)
02.557.51012.51517.52022.5
0 5 10 15 20 25
02.557.51012.51517.520
0 5 10 15 20 250
10
20
0 5 10 15 20 25
12C(16O,16F(0-)) θreac=0ο - 0.25o
GT, 1+
SDR(2-)
SDR(2-)SDR (2-&1-)
12C(d,2He) 270 MeV
θcm = 0ο - 1o
Preliminary
GT, 1+
H. Okamura et al. PLB 345 (1995) 1.
Different structurecompared with (d,2He) • GT(1+) at 0 MeV
• Hindered
• SDR(2-) at 4.5 MeV
• SDR(2- & 1-) at 7.5 MeV
• SD 0- at 9.3 MeV ?
• Enhancement
12C(16O,16F(0-))12B spectrum
Counts/1 MeV
dσ/dΩdE (mb/sr MeV)
0.0
1.0
0 5 10 15 20 25Excitation energy of 12B (MeV)
02.557.51012.51517.52022.5
0 5 10 15 20 25
02.557.51012.51517.520
0 5 10 15 20 250
10
20
0 5 10 15 20 25
12C(16O,16F(0-)) θreac=0ο - 0.25o
12C(d,2He) 270 MeV
θcm = 0ο - 1o
GT, 1+
SDR(2-)
SD, 0- ?Preliminary
SDR(2-)SDR (2-&1-)
GT, 1+
H. Okamura et al. PLB 345 (1995) 1.
More analysis (ang. dist. etc.) required, but (16O,16F(0-)) seems promising for 0- study
Summary
We propose parity-transfer reaction (16O,16F(0-)) for 0- study To confirm its effectiveness, we applied this reaction to 12C. ⇒ 12C(16O,16F(0-)) at 250A MeV @ RIBF & SHARAQ Preliminary results
• Successful identification of 16F(0-)
• Enhancement at ~9 MeV in 12B ⇒ Known 0- at 9.3 MeV ?⇒ (16O,16F(0-)) seems promising for 0- study
This is FIRST-STEP study to apply parity-trans. reaction to Collective 0- strengths in heavier nuclei (40Ca, 90Zr,…)
⇒ Systematic 0- study
Collaborators
RIKEN Nishina Center • T. Uesaka, M. Sasano, J. Zenihiro, H. Sakai, T. Kubo, K. Yoshida, Y. Yanagisawa, N. Fukuda, H. Takeda, D. Kameda, N. Inabe
CNS, University of Tokyo • S. Shimoura, K. Yako, S. Michimasa, S. Ota, M. Matsushida, H. Tokieda, H. Miya, S. Kawase, K. Kisamori, M. Takaki, Y. Kubota, C. S. Lee, R. Yokoyama, M. Kobayashi, K. Kobayashi
Kyushu University • T. Wakasa, K. Fujita, S. Sakaguchi, A. Okura, S. Shindo, K. Tabata
Aizu University • H. Sagawa, M. Yamagami
Backup
0- Search via Polarization Measurements
Azz in 12C(d,2He)H. Okamura et al., PRC 66, 054602 (2002).
Dij in 12C(p,n)
Clear observation of 0- at Ex~9MeV in A=12 system
M. Dozono et al., JPSJ 77, 014201 (2008).
SDR D
0 ∞1 0
2 ~1
SDR A
0 -2
1 +1
2 ~0
Need to separate SD 0-,1-,2- ⇒ Polarization observables
Azz measurement for (d,2He) at KVI
SDR at 7.5 MeV • Low-energy part : 2- • High-energy part : 1-
2- 1-
M.A. de Huu et al., PLB 649, 35 (2007).
Coincidence measurement of p + HI @ SHARAQ
Use SHARAQ as TWO spectrometers • Proton : Q-Q-D (S0→S1) • HI (A/Z~2) : Q-Q-D-Q-D (S0→S2)
Proton (S0→S1) Momentum resolution : dp/p = 1/4330 Angular resolution : ~ 2 mrad Momentum acceptance : ±12% Angular acceptance : ~2.2 msr !HI (S0→S2) Momentum resolution : dp/p = 1/15300 Angular resolution : ~ 1 mrad Momentum acceptance : ±1% Angular acceptance : ~3 msr
Invariant mass resolution : ~100 keV Missing mass resolution : ~1 MeV
Ion-optics study of S0 → S1
Trajectories measured with secondary proton beam
Measured matrix elements (units: m,rad)
Angle at S0 aS0 [mrad]
Ang
le a
t S1 a S
1 [m
rad]
Angle at S0 aS0 (mrad)
Angle at S1 a S1 (mrad)
magnet field settings
S0
S1
LP-MWDCsMWDCs
SDQ D1
Proton beam
Comparison with (d,2He) • GT(1+) at 0 MeV
• Hindered
• SDR(2-) at 4.5 MeV
• SDR(2-&1-) at 7.5 MeV
• SD 0- at 9.3 MeV
• Enhancement ?
12C(16O,16F(0-))12B Spectrum
Counts/1 MeV
dσ/dΩdE (mb/sr MeV)
0.00 5 10 15 20 25Excitation energy of 12B (MeV)
02.557.51012.51517.52022.5
0 5 10 15 20 25
02.557.51012.51517.520
0 5 10 15 20 250
10
20
0 5 10 15 20 25
12C(16O,16F(0-)) θreac=0ο - 0.25o
GT, 1+
SDR(2-)
SD, 0- ?Preliminary
More analysis (ang. dist. etc.) required, but (16O,16F(0-)) seems promising for 0- study
0-遷移とパイ中間子(テンソル)相関• なぜ0-はパイ中間子(テンソル)相関に敏感か? • 純粋なπ交換(σ・q)による遷移⇔ 他のスピン•アイソスピン遷移 (1+,2-,…)にはρ交換(σxq)も混じる
!
• 高運動量(q~2 fm-1)で大きな遷移密度⇒ π交換力に敏感 (π交換力は高運動量領域で大)⇔ 例えば、 GT 1+はq~0 fm-1で大きな密度
有効(残留)相互作用
運動量
運動量
π交換力
π交換力+短距離斥力(g’)